From the passage above, what seems to be the most common factor in the spread of industrialization

The consequences of modern warfare are manifold, and it affects every single stratum of mankind, whether it be social, cultural, political or economic.

The consequences of war can be either long- or short-lasting and are widely dispersed. Soldiers' perspectives on war differ from those of civilians. Even though both sides suffer during a war, atrocities are particularly committed against women and children. Up to two million people killed in armed conflicts in the last ten years were children. Another legacy of these conflicts is the widespread trauma brought on by these atrocities and the suffering of the civilian population, which leads to significant emotional and psychological stress. Nowadays, internal conflicts often cause more harm to civilians than external conflicts. This is a result of the growing trend among combatants to strategically target civilians. Mass city destruction and long-lasting effects on a nation's economy are also consequences of war.

Social Effect of War - Forced migration or displacement occurs most frequently during times of war and can be harmful to both the community and an individual. When a war breaks out, a lot of people flee their homes out of fear for their lives and the lives of their families, which causes them to lose their way either internally or externally.

Cultural assets are at risk of being destroyed, taken away, looted, and robbed during a war. Archaeological artefacts, excavation sites, archives, and museums are examples of cultural heritage that are damaged by combatants to fund the conflict.

Health Effect of War- Women and men are negatively impacted by conflict, which frequently leads to gender-specific challenges that are not acknowledged or addressed by the majority population around the world. Because they are more probable to die from indirect causes than direct causes, women are affected differently by war.

Economic Effect of War -The effects of war on the economy could be devastating both during and after the conflict.  A community's or nation's regular activities are interfered with, and possible property damage results.

The labour force is impacted in many different ways, but it is most frequently impacted by the severe loss of life, changes in population, the shrinking labour force due to the influx of refugees and displacement, and the destruction of infrastructure, which in turn leads to a decline in productivity.

Read more about the consequences of war on

https://brainly.com/question/794997

Answer:

Because they were the more racist states.

Explanation:

Some states, such as the southern states, were more racist that others (civil war), so they tried to find ways to get unwanted voters to not vote.

Answer:

To blunt that response, Japan decided to attack the U.S Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor, hoping that the U.S would negotiate peace. The attack at Pearl Harbor was a huge gamble, but one which did not pay off. Though Japan took its objectives in the Pacific and Southeast Asia, the U.S did not respond as expected. Instead of reverting to isolationism, the U.S geared up for total war and Japan's fate was sealed. Japan attacked the U.S Pacific Fleet at its base at Pearl Harbor on the 7th of December 1941, but what led to that decision? Why did the Japanese attack the USA? - The answer is oil.

Explanation:

Hope it helps ;)

The overall purposes of the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Clayton Act, and the Robinson-Patman Act are to promote fair competition and prevent anti-competitive practices in the marketplace.

The Sherman Antitrust Act, enacted in 1890, is aimed at prohibiting agreements and practices that restrain trade or monopolize markets. It seeks to prevent businesses from engaging in activities that stifle competition, such as price-fixing, monopolistic mergers, and unfair business practices.The Clayton Act, passed in 1914, is designed to strengthen the Sherman Antitrust Act by further defining and prohibiting specific anti-competitive practices. It addresses issues like price discrimination, exclusive dealing agreements, and tying contracts, which can harm competition and consumers.
The Robinson-Patman Act, enacted in 1936, specifically focuses on preventing price discrimination that can disadvantage smaller businesses.

It prohibits sellers from offering different prices to different buyers for the same product, unless justified by cost differences or other legitimate factors.
These acts are related in that they all aim to promote fair competition and prevent anti-competitive behavior. The Sherman Antitrust Act lays the foundation for addressing monopolistic practices, while the Clayton Act and the Robinson-Patman Act provide additional regulations and prohibitions to strengthen competition and protect smaller businesses from unfair practices.

To know more about marketplace visit
https://brainly.com/question/12424281
#SPJ11

Answer:

i think woman being as equal as man  

Explanation:

th most positive impact of ( NOW )and other women's organization is providing women an opportunity to change how society works allowing women to fully participate in society, so that they close the gender gap in terms of education, politics, employment, and are considered equal of men.

. NOW’s actions have helped put women in political posts; increased educational, employment, and business opportunities for women.

The most positive impact of NOW and other's woman organization is;

Woman organization are woman groups that supports and enhance woman inclusivity in various spheres of life.

They give support by lending woman a voice, they give inputs or materials for business and scholarships.

no

Therefore, the most positive impact of NOW and other's woman organization is to helps to build confidence in woman.

Learn more organization here,

https://brainly.com/question/19334871

John Locke, a political theorist who is also known as the father of the modern Republican government.

He was of the believe that a state can only be legitimate if it receives the agreement of the government through a social contract.

He always promoted the system of democratic government,  that has a system of checks and balance. In his views, all the men and only men has the political right to life,  property, and liberty. He believed that human beings are inherently good and they can make their own reasonable decisions even without a government.

Learn more about government powers here.

https://brainly.com/question/2945266

#SPJ4

Answer:

the answer is c

Explanation:

I just dug in the question

Answer:

The social gospel's origins are often traced to the rise of late 19th-century urban industrialization, immediately following the Civil War. Largely, but not exclusively, rooted in Protestant churches, the social gospel emphasized how Jesus' ethical teachings could remedy the problems caused by “Gilded Age” capitalism.

Explanation:

Why did some ministers and lay believers embrace the Social Gospel?

Because became a central theme of the social gospel movement which also became tied to a belief in what Ohio minister Washington Gladden called “social salvation.” This concept emphasized that religion's fundamental purpose was to create systemic changes in American political.

The Social Gospel was a social movement within Protestantism that applied Christian ethics to social problems, especially issues of social justice such as economic inequality, poverty, alcoholism, crime, racial tensions, slums, unclean environment, child labor, lack of unionization, poor schools, and the dangers of war. It was most prominent in the early-20th-century United States and Canada. Theologically, the Social Gospelers sought to put into practice the Lord's Prayer (Matthew 6:10): "Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven". They typically were postmillennialist; that is, they believed the Second Coming could not happen until humankind rid itself of social evils by human effort.[a] The Social Gospel was more popular among clergy than laity. Its leaders were predominantly associated with the liberal wing of the progressive movement, and most were theologically liberal, although a few were also conservative when it came to their views on social issues. Important leaders included Richard T. Ely, Josiah Strong, Washington Gladden, and Walter Rauschenbusch.

Answer:

Explanation:

As a Supreme Court justice, my initial reactions to the situation would depend on the specific details and context of the case at hand. However, when considering the War Powers Act, it is important to evaluate the roles and powers of each branch of government involved in order to determine which branch may be in the right.

The War Powers Act is designed to address the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches regarding the use of military force. It sets guidelines for the president's authority to deploy troops without a declaration of war and imposes certain reporting requirements to Congress.

In this case, I would assess whether the president's actions in deploying troops align with the provisions and limitations outlined in the War Powers Act. I would carefully consider the extent of the president's powers as commander-in-chief and whether they have been exceeded, leading to a potential infringement on Congress's authority to declare war or provide authorization for military actions.

During oral arguments, I would ask both sides to explain their respective points of view. To the executive branch, I would inquire about the legal justification and rationale for the deployment of troops, seeking clarification on the specific provisions of the War Powers Act that were considered in making the decision. I would also ask whether the president followed the required reporting procedures to Congress.

To the legislative branch, I would inquire about their interpretation of the War Powers Act and whether they believe the president's actions exceeded his authority. I would seek explanations regarding their understanding of Congress's role in declaring war or authorizing military actions and how they believe the president's actions align or deviate from these constitutional provisions.

Additional questions could include seeking clarification on the immediacy and necessity of the deployment, the potential national security implications, the presence of any ongoing threat, and the extent of consultation and communication between the executive and legislative branches.

Through these questions, I would aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of the legal arguments, constitutional implications, and factual circumstances surrounding the case to make an informed decision in accordance with the War Powers Act and the principles of checks and balances outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

Like all Americans during the colonial era, most northern slaves were subject to legal and economic systems of slavery.

During the colonial era in America, including the northern colonies, slavery was a widespread institution. Most northern slaves, like their counterparts in the southern colonies, were subjected to the legal and economic systems of slavery.

While the majority of slaves were concentrated in the southern colonies due to the plantation-based agricultural economy, northern colonies also practiced slavery to varying degrees. Slavery existed in sectors such as agriculture, domestic service, and skilled labor in the North.

Though the number of slaves in the North was relatively smaller compared to the South, slavery was still a significant part of the colonial economy and played a role in shaping society and labor systems in northern colonies.

Learn more about Slavery here: brainly.com/question/866336

#SPJ11

Answer:

A father might be sold away by his owner while the mother and children remained behind, or the mother and children might be sold. Enslaved families were also divided for inheritance when an owner died, or because the owners' adult children moved away to create new lives, taking some of the enslaved people with them.

Explanation:

One of the weaknesses of the procedural model of democracy is that it can prioritize formal processes and procedures over substantive outcomes and the actual will of the people. Here are some key points to consider:

Emphasis on procedures: The procedural model focuses on the formal mechanisms of democracy, such as elections, rule of law, and institutions. While these processes are essential for a functioning democracy, they can sometimes overshadow the substantive goals and values that democracy should aim to achieve, such as social justice, equality, and the protection of human rights.

Potential for exclusion: Procedural democracy may not guarantee equal participation and representation for all members of society. Certain groups, such as marginalized communities or disadvantaged individuals, may face barriers to meaningful engagement in the democratic process. This can result in the exclusion of voices and perspectives, leading to unequal power dynamics and limited representation.

Vulnerability to manipulation: Procedural democracy can be susceptible to manipulation and manipulation tactics. Political actors and powerful interest groups may exploit legal and procedural loopholes to influence outcomes in their favor, undermining the democratic principles of fairness and equality.

Lack of responsiveness: The procedural model may prioritize stability and institutional procedures over responsiveness to changing social, economic, and environmental realities. This can lead to a slow response to pressing issues and challenges, hindering the ability to address the evolving needs and concerns of the population effectively.

Disconnect with citizen engagement: A purely procedural approach to democracy can create a sense of detachment between citizens and the decision-making process. It may limit opportunities for meaningful citizen engagement, deliberation, and active participation, resulting in reduced trust and alienation from the political system.

It is important to note that the weaknesses mentioned above are not inherent to the procedural model of democracy itself but rather highlight the potential shortcomings when the focus solely remains on procedural aspects without sufficient attention to substantive outcomes and citizen participation.

To know more about democracy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33633662
#SPJ11

A. anti-semitic attitudes and D. attitude of denial about Jewish persecution prevented the united states from relaxing its immigration standards

In the late 1930s and early 1940s, a number of issues made it impossible for the United States to loosen its immigration restrictions and accept more Jewish refugees as refugees. Jewish refugees found it challenging to garner support for their cause at this time because of strong anti-Semitism that existed in the United States.

Many Americans were worried about how an inflow of migrants would affect the overall economy at this time because the country was still struggling to recover from the Great Depression. There were denial-based attitudes, and many Americans did not understand the severity of the persecution of Jews in Europe or the immediacy of the situation.

Read more about Jewish refugees on:

https://brainly.com/question/28181537

#SPJ4

Answer:

Sonny lose touch with all his friends from Coalwood because of his dream of working on a space craft. This tells us life is unpredictable and you will never know where you end up.

Explanation:

Sonny's best friend Roy Lee becomes a banker, while O'Dell works in insurance and farming for the rest of his life. The remaining members (Quentin, Billy, and Sherman) all became engineers, much like Sonny.

*I've never read this book but based on information I searched up this is what I think :)

Answer: No, the "n" word should never be used.

Answer: I think African Americans Should be the only people saying the "N" word

Explanation:

In my opinion, only black people "African Americans" should only say the "N' word. It's disrespectful when someone says the N-word when they are white (Caucasian.) Though I wouldn't be mass talking about it, for example: Screaming the n-word, wearing shirts, (With the n-word on it), etc.

* (This is again, MY OPINION if you disagree it's YOUR OWN OPINION, you have your rights, and if you disagree it's not my problem.)

(If you mean something else I apologize, this is what I think you meant and if this isn't correct I apology)

Answer:

Convoy: A group of unarmed ships guarded  by destroyers and battleships

Protracted: Drawn out or extended for a long

Reconnaissance: The act of securing information

Answer: False

Explanation:

the allied forces defeated hitler in the ending of ww2

Answer:

Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by the Federalist Congress in 1798 and signed into law by President Adams.

Explanation:

These laws included new powers to deport foreigners as well as making it harder for new immigrants to vote. Prior a new immigrant would have to reside in the United States for five years before becoming eligible to vote, but a new law raised this to 14 years.

Answer:

Deprived of the right to vote

Let me know if I'm right!

Answer:

el derecho de opinar

Explanation:

To travel the vast, uncharted region and to begin a new life filled with possibilities.

In accordance with the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, service members have the right to follow their religion however they choose or to have no religion at all, as stated in this directive.

Religious belief and practice have a big impact on how one develops their own moral standards and moral sense. People who regularly practice their religion are often shielded from a variety of societal problems.

Thus, To travel the vast, uncharted region and to begin a new life filled.

For more information about religious reasons, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3619244

#SPJ1

The term used when an artist tries to fool the viewer into thinking what they are seeing is real and not merely a representational illusion is "trompe l'oeil".

The term is from French meaning "deceive the eye."Trompe l'oeil is a visual technique used in painting in which the artist uses photorealistic details to create a realistic image. This can include 3D objects, shadows, and other techniques to make the painting appear as if it is three-dimensional or real. The technique is often used to create optical illusions or to fool the viewer into thinking they are seeing something that is not there in reality.

In summary, "trompe l'oeil" is the term used when an artist tries to fool the viewer into thinking what they are seeing is real and not merely a representational illusion.

To know more about visual technique visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24264452

#SPJ11

Answer: William the Conqueror

Explanation:

Answer:

opinion

Explanation:

D. Britain is the Western nation that colonized Sri Lanka.

The Western nation that had colonized Sri Lanka is Britain. The colonization is a process by which a country control over a foreign country. Thus option (D) is correct.

Colonization refers to the process by which a country or group of people establish control over a foreign territory, with the intent of exploiting its resources, establishing political and economic dominance, and sometimes even settling people from the colonizing country in the new territory.

Colonization has historically been driven by various motivations, including economic gain, religious and ideological expansion, and geopolitical influence.

The colonizers often use military force to subjugate the local population, and may impose their own language, culture, and political system on the territory.

The Britain had colonized Sri Lanka. Therefore, option (D) is correct.

Learn more about colonization here:

https://brainly.com/question/12880222

#SPJ7

Answer: she has always been and she slays it.

Explanation: she is a thick baddie and has great music thats why she has always been the queen of rap she is so slay.