Which of the following words best describes the early beginnings of
Answers
can you elaborate more abt the q
Answer:
Early beginnings of what?
Related Questions
what asian country was closed to the u.s. for more than 200 years A. China b. Hawaii c. Japan
Answers
Answer: C. Japan
Explanation:
what was the purpose of the all-white primary, which was used in texas until the 1944 decision in smith v. allwright?
Answers
The purpose of the all-white primary, which was used in Texas until the 1944 decision in Smith v. Allwright, was to exclude African Americans from participating in primary elections and thus restrict their political power and influence.
The all-white primary was a discriminatory practice that originated in the southern United States, including Texas, during the Jim Crow era. It was a system in which political parties, particularly the Democratic Party, conducted primary elections open only to white voters, effectively barring African Americans from participating in the crucial first stage of the electoral process.
The purpose of the all-white primary was to maintain white supremacy and solidify white control over the political system. By limiting participation to white voters, political parties aimed to prevent African Americans from influencing candidate selection and shaping policy decisions.
This discriminatory practice was part of a broader set of laws and practices implemented to enforce racial segregation and deny African Americans their civil rights.
In 1944, the Supreme Court case Smith v. Allwright challenged the constitutionality of the all-white primary in Texas. The Court ruled that the exclusion of African Americans from primary elections violated the Fifteenth Amendment, which granted African American men the right to vote.
This landmark decision struck down the all-white primary system, marking a significant step towards dismantling racial discrimination in the electoral process.
Smith v. Allwright played a crucial role in the broader civil rights movement, as it challenged the legal framework of racial segregation and laid the groundwork for subsequent legal battles against discriminatory voting practices. It highlighted the importance of protecting voting rights and combating systemic racial discrimination in the United States.
To know more about all-white primary refer here
https://brainly.com/question/5556144#
#SPJ11
I live in a big city neighborhood _________ without a single bathroom.
What is supposed to be in the blank?
Answers
How did Louis XVIII's form of government differ from the previous monarchy?
Answers
Answer:
Louis XVIII ruled as king for slightly less than a decade. The government of the Bourbon Restoration was a constitutional monarchy, unlike the Ancien Régime, which was absolutist. As a constitutional monarch, Louis XVIII's royal prerogative was reduced substantially by the Charter of 1814, France's new constitution.
Explanation:
At the end of the Civil War, Lincoln faced tremendous challenges, as did newly freed Black people seeking a way to fend for themselves in their new situation: trying to earn a living, buy or lease property on which to do it, and protect themselves and their families from the brutalities of vengeful former slave owners. Read the brief correspondences identifying these needs and challenges, and write a brief personal response.
Letter from a northern teacher to the Freedmen's Bureau
Correspondence from southern blacks who had been working land seized by the Union now intended for return to its previous owners
Letter from southern blacks requesting assistance and protection from the federal government
What were the challenges facing Black people after the war? How did things change for the better, and how did they change in some cases for the worse? Was it the federal government's responsibility to provide land and other assistance? Physical protection? Reflect briefly on the situation.
Answers
Answer:
hope this helps mark me brainless if u want
Explanation:
After the end of the war, instead of legislating to protect the rights of the newly freed slaves, the southern legislature made a set of laws called the Black Codes that undermined the rights of blacks and kept them under the authority of whites.
14
Case Study: The Kennewick Man
The most contentious case in the history of NAGPRA, and one of the stimuli in moving this legislation forward was the case of the Kennewick Man. In 1996, human skeletal remains were found by canoers along the bank of the Columbia River in Kennewick, WA. Upon further inspection this skeleton, dubbed Kennewick Man, turned out to be 8,400 years old and at the time was one of the most complete skeletons ever found in North America. The primary basis of these results were radiometric tests to determine the age and the inspection of the skeleton by several trained osteologists. Once Kennewick’s age and origins were discovered, scientists immediately recognized the significance of these remains to understanding the peopling of the Americas by over the last 13,000 years.
Almost as soon as Kennewick Man was discovered to be an early American, the Columbia River Basin Indian tribes also recognized that this individual was likely a distant relative and, therefore, could be repatriated (returned) under NAGPRA. The primary basis of their case was oral history of the peopling of this area and long-term residence of contemporary tribes which indicated he was a direct tribal ancestor. The problem? Under NAGPRA "cultural affiliation" is usually determined using burial goods, burial style, and other "archaeological" (read "scientific") markers of culture. Oral history is not considered evidence of cultural affiliation.
Thus was born the ethical and legal dilemma:
Under NAGPRA the remains did not have to be legally returned.
Scientists working on the remains argued the following:
To repatriate unaffiliated remains would be unethical as Native Americans are not monolithic and contemporary groups’ burial practices aren’t identical to their early ancestors; in other words, Columbia River Basin tribal burial practices are different today than they were 8,000 or more years ago.
From the standpoint of beneficence, these remains belonged to all of humanity not just these descendants. To rebury these remains without studying them could set research on early diseases, ways of life, etc. back centuries.
Tribal leaders working on getting the remains repatriated argued the following:
It would be unethical to keep remains unburied and in a museum given long-term cultural norms about the dead.
From the standpoint of nonmaleficence and autonomy, the tribal leaders noted that this ancestor had not consented to being studied (much like Henrietta Lacks in the 1950s) and this individual and the community would be harmed by not being able to decide the fate of Kennewick Man’s remains.
Over the decades Kennewick Man went from storage to research lab to storage and finally was placed in permanent storage in 2002. On February 17, 2017, more than twenty years after his remains were found, Kennewick Man’s skeleton was returned to the earth in a private, unmarked location. While the issue has technically been resolved, the ethical dilemmas from this scenario continue to inform the way researchers think about further research.
Answers
Answer:
The case of the Kennewick Man highlights an ethical and legal dilemma that arose under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The Columbia River Basin Indian tribes recognized Kennewick Man as a distant relative and wanted to repatriate the remains under NAGPRA, based on oral history and the belief that he was a direct tribal ancestor. However, under NAGPRA, "cultural affiliation" is usually determined using archaeological markers of culture, such as burial goods and burial style, rather than oral history.
Scientists working on the remains argued that to repatriate unaffiliated remains would be unethical, as it could set research on early diseases and ways of life back centuries. They also argued that the remains belonged to all of humanity and not just the descendants of the Columbia River Basin Indian tribes. On the other hand, tribal leaders argued that it would be unethical to keep the remains unburied and in a museum, given cultural norms about the dead. They also noted that this ancestor had not consented to being studied and that the community would be harmed by not being able to decide the fate of Kennewick Man's remains.
Ultimately, after more than 20 years of legal and ethical debates, Kennewick Man's skeleton was returned to the earth in a private, unmarked location in 2017. This case continues to inform the way researchers think about further research and the ethical implications of studying human remains.
What was another name for the French and Indian war
Answers
Answer:
It was the seven years war.
Explanation:
That is what they called it in England.
Answer:
King William's War
Explanation:
Imaginary wall separating Soviet satellite countries from the west
answer choices
Iron Curtain
Red Scare
Berlin Wall
Communist Stonewall
Answers
The Iron Curtain is the imaginary wall that separates the Soviet satellite countries from the West.
The iron curtain between the USSR and Western countriesDuring the Cold War an ideological and political border was created that divided Europe in two; A capitalist part and a communist part under the control of the USSR
Following the end of the Cold War and the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Iron Curtain or imaginary wall became less opaque; However, as a result of the war, Russia, Ukraine, the curtain returned to acquire greater thickness.
The imaginary wall between capitalists and communistsAlthough the term iron curtain was adopted in 1945 by Joseph Goebbels during Nazi propaganda, this expression actually became famous when the North Atlantic Treaty Organization came into being in 1949 and later the Warsaw Pact in 1955)
On one side of the curtain were the Soviet satellite countries, which were considered part of Eastern Europe, while on the other side were the Western countries, or Eastern Europe along with the United States.
With the advance of globalization, it was thought that the iron curtain would gradually cease to exist until it disappeared completely, but the Russia-Ukraine war brought the term back into fashion.
Learn more about the imaginary wall that separates the Soviet satellite countries from the west at https://brainly.com/question/11755699
#SPJ4
This Fourteenth Amendment clause means that
Answers
Answer:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
write yes if you think that the event in the evidence box was a return to to normalcy for the United States in the 1920’s and write no if you think the event was not a return to a normalcy for the United States in the 1920’s
Answers
Connections between the declaration of independence and the first prinple popular sovereignty be sure to include a quote from the declaration of independance
Answers
Answer:
We can find the principle of popular sovereignty in this direct quote from the declaration of independence:
"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"
In the quote, we can see that the founding fathers believed that government authority stemmed from the consent of the governed. In other words, that the legitimacy of government comes from the people, and nothing else.
how did akhenaten’s practices differ from practices of other pharaohs of the eighteenth dynasty?
Answers
Akhenaten's practices differ from practices of other pharaohs as a) -he had himself depicted as a family man, not a living god and b) he developed new religious ideas that leaned toward monotheism.
Few figures in Egyptian history have polarized the public as much as Akhenaten. The time surrounding this Egyptian king's reign was marked by social, political, and religious turmoil on a scale that few cultures have ever seen.
In just under two decades on the throne, Akhenaten imposed new aspects of Egyptian religion, overhauled its royal artistic style, moved Egypt's capital to a previously unoccupied site, implemented a new form of architecture and attempted to obliterate the names and images of some of Egypt's traditional gods.
Because of the turbulent nature of Akhenaten's reign, this period in Egyptian history, known as the Amarna period, has attracted a great deal of attention from researchers and the general public.
To know more about Akhenaten:
https://brainly.com/question/21244749
#SPJ4
Correct question:
How did Akhenaten's practices differ from practices of other pharaohs of the Eighteenth Dynasty?
a) -He had himself depicted as a family man, not a living god.
b) He developed new religious ideas that leaned toward monotheism.
c) -He was unusually aggressive in his military conquests.
d) -He closely aligned himself with powerful priests.
Which country began setting up missions in the American Southwest in the late 1500s? France Italy England Spain
Answers
Answer: Spain
Explanation:
The history of Spain's missions in the American South and Southwest reveals much about Spain's strategy, contributions, and failures in these regions. The expeditions of Francisco Vázquez de Coronado (1540 –42) and Juan de Oñate (1598) convinced Spanish authorities that no wealthy Indian empires like that of the Aztecs were to be found north of Mexico. Consequently the Spanish came to view the northern frontier of their empire as a defensive barrier and as a place where pagan souls might be saved. In what are now the states of Florida, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, missions were founded to propagate the doctrines of the Roman Catholic church. To protect these missions as well as the mines and ranches of Mexico from attack from the north, the Spanish established presidios — fortified garrisons of troops. Sorry for all the info. :)
Answer:
D. spain
Explanation:
What was the name of the Union plan to surrOund and divide the Confederacy?
O Anaconda Plan
O Beauregard Plan
O Conscription Plan
O Crossroad Plan
Answers
Scott’s plan called for a strong blockade of the southern Ports and a major offensive down the Mississippi River to divide the confederacy and cut off supplies and assistance to its heartland.
Answer:
It is Anaconda Plan.
Explanation:
Which of the following accurately describes the period known as the Middle Ages or Medieval period?
Europe between the rise of the Roman Empire and its fall
World history between the fall of Constantinople and the Renaissance
Western Europe between the rise of Christianity and the rise of Islam
World history between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance
Answers
Answer:
World History between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance
Explanation:
World history between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance is accurately describing the period known as the Middle Ages or Medieval period. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is Middle Ages?
There were around 1,000 years in the Middle Ages, which lasted from 1400 to 1450. Three periods, including the Early Middle Ages, High Middle Ages, and Late Middle Ages, made up the Middle Ages. The Middle Ages are also known as the Dark Ages.
According to the period of 1,000 years ago, the Middle Ages or Medieval period, As in the ancient period of time as the Roman Empire and the Renaissance, the main reason for the fall was the conflict between religious belief and the diseases that spread all over the world. Millions of people died.
As a result, the World history between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance as they described the Middle Ages or Medieval period. Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about Middle Ages, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26586178
#SPJ2
the author of utopia, a satire on european government and society, was
Answers
The author of "Utopia," a satire on European government and society, was Sir Thomas More. This book was published in 1516 and depicts an imaginary island that has a near-perfect society, including a system of communal property and access to education for all.
Sir Thomas More wrote "Utopia," which was published in 1516 and became a classic in the history of political philosophy. In the book, he tells the story of a sailor who discovered the island of Utopia, where there is no private property and everyone has access to the necessities of life.
In addition, the island has a system of communal property, and each person has access to education and a fair trial. The system of government is based on the idea that the state is responsible for the welfare of its citizens.
More's book is a satire on European government and society. He uses Utopia to illustrate how society could be improved by adopting a system of communal property and providing access to education for all.
Sir Thomas More's "Utopia" is a political satire that describes a fictional society that is nearly perfect. The society is based on communal ownership and access to education for all. The island is governed by a council of elders who are chosen by the people. The society is divided into groups of families, and everyone works for the common good. There is no private property, and everyone has access to the necessities of life.
The book was written in 1516, during a period of social and political upheaval in Europe. The Catholic Church was losing its grip on power, and new ideas were challenging traditional authority. More's book was a response to this changing world. It was an attempt to envision a society that was fairer and more just than the one he lived in.
The author of "Utopia," a satire on European government and society, was Sir Thomas More. He wrote the book in 1516, during a period of social and political change in Europe. The book describes an imaginary island that has a nearly perfect society, with communal property and access to education for all. The book was an attempt to envision a society that was fairer and more just than the one More lived in.
To know more about Utopia visit:
brainly.com/question/30104693
#SPJ11
how did atomic bombs lead to conflict between the soviet union and the u.s.
Answers
Answer:
Politics
Explanation:
How did the invention of the steamboat help the United States to industrialize?
Answers
in the 1927 nixon v. herndon case, the u.s. supreme court ruled that __________, prompting the legislature to declare the next year that political parties were private organizations.
Answers
I apologize for the confusion. The 1927 Nixon v. Herndon case did not prompt the legislature to declare that political parties were private organizations. It appears there might be a factual error or misunderstanding in the information provided. The ruling in the Nixon v. Herndon case itself did not directly lead to such a declaration by the legislature.
To know more about legislature visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33634275
#SPJ11
The 1927 Nixon v. Herndon case did not prompt the legislature to declare that political parties were private organizations. It appears there might be a factual error or misunderstanding in the information provided. The ruling in the Nixon v. Herndon case itself did not directly lead to such a declaration by the legislature.
To know more about legislature Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8709721
#SPJ11
Absolutism and Revolution ESSAY Assignment
Objectives
Describe characteristics of government and the rights of citizens under Napoleon’s rule in France.
Compare and contrast the causes and effects of the American Revolution and the French Revolution.
For this activity, answer the following questions.
What did the Napoleonic Code have in common with the principles of the Enlightenment?
Write a paragraph comparing the changes in government after the American and French revolutions. Include information on each country's constitution and government role.
Answers
Napoleon surrounded himself with smart and accomplished colleagues and professionals and backed a merit-based system in the military, but his administration swiftly devolved into an autocratic one-man operation.
Three parliamentary bodies made up Napoleon's new government, the Consulate: the Council of State, which drafted laws; the Tribunate, which debated laws but did not have the power to vote; and the Legislative Assembly, whose members cast votes on the laws after reviewing the Tribunate's record of debate.
The three aforementioned legislative assemblies were equivalent in power to the Conservative Senate. As Napoleon's authority grew, he adopted many Ancien Régime practices in his new one-man rule system.
Learn more about Napoleon here:
https://brainly.com/question/22142458
#SPJ1
the "welfare capitalism" of the 1920s did not provide american workers any
Answers
During the 1920s, this practice did not adequately provide American workers with the support they needed.
The term "welfare capitalism" refers to the practice of companies providing benefits and services to their employees, such as healthcare and retirement plans, in order to improve worker productivity and loyalty.
Despite the growth of this practice, many workers still faced poor working conditions, low wages, and limited opportunities for advancement.
The lack of collective bargaining power and government protections for workers during this time meant that many employees were left without a voice or recourse when faced with unfair treatment.
As a result, many workers turned to unionization and other forms of activism to demand better working conditions and protections.
To know more about adequately refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30341221#
#SPJ11
Wich statetment best explains why people of the fertile cresent traded
Answers
The statement best explains why people of the fertile cresent traded is They traded their goods for resources they did not have..
What is the reason behind how people of the fertile cresent traded ?The reason behind how people of the fertile cresent traded was that were trying to carry out the activities of trade by barter which involves the process of giving what they have out so that they can in return what they never had.
It should be noted that some of their goods were been trade out so that they can have access to those resources that they do not have and this was the reason why they engaged in the trading activities and this actually helped them alot because they were able to have those things they never had after the trading activities with the people.
Therefore, the last option is correct
Learn more about resources here:
https://brainly.com/question/24514288
#SPJ1
missing options
They traded their resources for food to survive.
They traded their extra crops for luxury goods only.
They traded goods for access to water.
They traded their goods for resources they did not have.
Which of the following is NOT a reason why European nations were forced to go abroad for additional resources?
the land on the continent was limited
the population of Europe was growing quickly
the land on the continent was carved into territories that couldn't be expanded without a major war
none of the above
Answers
Answer:
None of the above
Explanation:
This is because the other 3 answers were all reasons. Europe is a small continent, so the land is limited. Population also grew rapidly on the European mainland, coupled with the land issues, this meant either they had to go abroad or fight major wars. So none of the above is correct.
how many countries are in North America and what are they
Answers
Answer:
There are 23 countries in North America:
HaitiHonduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Saint Kitts and NevisSaint
LuciaSaint
Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
United States
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Canada
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
In "The Five Faces of Oppression" Iris Young specifically defines oppression as being cruel or unfair
Answers
The given statement "The Five Faces of Oppression, Iris Young does not simply define oppression as being cruel or unfair" is False because Iris Young's definition of oppression goes beyond just being cruel or unfair, as it highlights the structural, systemic, and institutional nature of these forms of domination.
Instead, she offers a more complex and comprehensive analysis of oppression by identifying five distinct forms it can take: exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and violence.
Exploitation refers to the systematic use of some groups' labor to benefit others, resulting in an unequal distribution of resources and rewards. Marginalization is the exclusion or sidelining of certain groups from mainstream society, limiting their access to opportunities, resources, and decision-making processes. Powerlessness relates to the lack of authority or influence some individuals or groups have over their own lives or the policies that affect them.Cultural imperialism is the imposition of one group's culture, values, and beliefs onto another, leading to the erasure or devaluation of the oppressed group's unique cultural identity. Finally, violence encompasses acts of physical harm or intimidation directed at individuals because of their membership in a specific social group.The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
In "The Five Faces of Oppression" Iris Young specifically defines oppression as being cruel or unfair
True or False
Know more about Oppression here:
https://brainly.com/question/25179345
#SPJ11
what best describes the type of government proposed in the new jersey plan? a. a loose confederation based largely on the articles of confederation b. a strong central government based largely on the british constitution c. a pure democracy in which all leaders are elected directly by the people d. a balanced government containing elements of monarchy and democracy
Answers
Option a i.e. a loose confederation based largely on the articles of confederations best describes the type of government proposed in the new jersey plan.
A unicameral (one-house) legislature with equal representation from all states and an administration chosen by the national legislature were proposed by William Paterson's New Jersey Plan. This proposal added authority to generate money, control trade, and manage foreign affairs while preserving the structure of government established by the Articles of Confederation.
One possibility for how the United States would be governed was the New Jersey Plan. Instead of the number of votes in Congress being based on population, the Plan advocated for each state to have one vote. This was done to safeguard each state's equality, irrespective of population size.
To know more about new jersey plan refer to the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/28907645?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Which protest leader in Boston may have been instrumental in escalating resentment of British policies to full-blown rebellion
Answers
which of the following following is not a necessary component of a state
a) territory
b) population
c) governor
d) sovereignty
Answers
c) governor
A governor is not a necessary component of a state. While a governor is a common feature in many modern nation-states, it is not an essential requirement for the existence of a state. The core components of a state are territory, population, and sovereignty.
a) Territory: A state must have a defined territory or land over which it exercises authority and control. This territory can include land, water, and airspace.
b) Population: A state must have a group of people who inhabit the territory and are considered its residents or citizens. The population can be diverse in terms of demographics, but there must be a community of individuals within the territorial boundaries.
d) Sovereignty: Sovereignty refers to the state's ability to exercise independent political authority and govern itself without interference from external powers. A state must have the capacity to make and enforce laws, establish institutions, and conduct international relations.
While a governor is often a key figure in the governance of a state, the specific form of government and leadership structure can vary. Some states may have governors, while others may have presidents, prime ministers, or other leadership positions. The absence of a governor does not negate the existence or functioning of a state.
for similar questions on state.
https://brainly.com/question/31285534
#SPJ8
5. How was King Tenkamenin
different from other Ghanaian
kings?
Answers
Answer:
Tenkamenin reigned in what is modern day Ghana from 1062 to 1076 - who would have known right? Ghana reached great heights during the short reign of Tenkamenin. Through his tactful management of the gold trade across the Sahara desert in West Africa, Tenkamenin’s empire prospered economically.
Hope this Helps!
In the Bonus Army incident in Washington, D.C., in 1932, federal troops did what?
Answers
In the Bonus Army incident in Washington, D.C., in 1932, federal troops forcefully dispersed the assembled World War I veterans who were demanding the immediate payment of their service bonuses.
In the Bonus Army incident in Washington, D.C., in 1932, federal troops used tear gas, bayonets, and even cavalry to force out the protesting veterans. The Bonus Army was a group of about 17,000 World War I veterans, along with their families and supporters, who came to Washington, D.C., in the summer of 1932. They were protesting the delay in receiving their bonuses, which were promised to be paid in 1945 but were sought by the veterans earlier due to the hardships of the Great Depression. The protesters set up camps and marched on the streets, demanding the early payment of their bonuses.
The situation escalated when the U.S. Senate rejected the Patman Bonus Bill, which aimed to advance the payment of these bonuses. The protesters refused to leave the city, leading to an increasingly tense atmosphere. As a result, on July 28, 1932, President Herbert Hoover ordered the federal troops to intervene and remove the protesters from the city.
The federal troops, led by General Douglas MacArthur, used tear gas and tanks to disperse the crowd. They forcefully evicted the Bonus Army from their camps and burned down the makeshift settlements. This violent response by the federal troops led to public outrage and criticism of the government's handling of the situation.
In summary, during the Bonus Army incident in Washington, D.C., in 1932, federal troops were ordered to remove the protesting World War I veterans from the city. They did so by using force, including tear gas and tanks, leading to a violent end to the protests and public criticism of the government's actions.
For more question on "Bonus Army" :
https://brainly.com/question/12450877
#SPJ11