Which amendment is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reporductive choice

Answer:

The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to enact legislation and declare war, the right to confirm or reject many Presidential appointments, and substantial investigative powers.

Explanation:

Parties are the most important factor in the organization of the work of Congress. Hence option A is correct .

The two major parties, the Democratic and Republican parties, dominate Congress and determine the majority and minority leadership, committee assignments, and legislative priorities.

Party leaders have significant control over the legislative process, including which bills are brought to the floor for a vote and how legislation is debated and amended. Party discipline is also important in ensuring that members vote in line with the party's agenda and priorities.

In addition, parties are crucial in organizing Congress through their use of committees. Committees are where most of the legislative work is done, and party leaders appoint members to committees based on their expertise and loyalty to the party.

While apportionment and gerrymandering can have an impact on the composition of Congress, parties ultimately have the most significant influence on the organization and functioning of Congress.

Pork, or the practice of inserting pet projects into legislation, can also be a factor in Congress, but it is not as central to the overall organization of the institution.

Learn more about Congress here

https://brainly.com/question/29614236

#SPJ2

Answer:

S C E N A R I O 1

Gennie, an eighteen year old college

student, is arrested for stealing a

classmate’s designer sweater and

selling it on eBay. When Gennie

appears before the judge, she asks

for a lawyer to help defend her. e

judge tells Gennie that if she is smart

enough to be in college, she knows

enough to defend herself. Besides, she

is not charged with a felony, so the

stakes are not very high.

S C E N A R I O 2

Susette bought a house and spent

years restoring it. She loves her home.

One day, she gets a notice that the

local government is going to take her

property in order to turn her land

over to a private company. e local

government says it can take Susette’s

home because the new jobs and tax

revenue created by the company will

benet the public.

S C E N A R I O 3  

Carolyn is arrested for shopliing a

candy bar from a grocery store. At

trial, she is found guilty. e judge

decides that the right punishment is

to cut o Carolyn’s hands so she will

not be able to shopli again.

S C E N A R I O 4

Congress wants to nd ways to cut

costs because of the soaring budget

decit. Congress passes a law to

require American citizens to house

US soldiers in their homes during

peacetime.

S C E N A R I O 5

Brett’s science teacher asks the class to

exchange papers to correct last night’s

homework. Brett refuses to let anyone

except the teacher see his homework

paper, and is sent to the principal.

S C E N A R I O 6

Concerned about rising crime,

lawmakers for the District of

Columbia ban all handguns in the

city, and require that shot-guns be

kept unloaded and/or disassembled.

S C E N A R I O 7

John, a fourteen year old public

school student, wears a shirt to school

that says “Be happy, not gay” to

express his belief that homosexuality

is wrong. His dean tells him he must

change his shirt or be suspended

from school. John refuses, and is

suspended for a week.

S C E N A R I O 8

irteen year old Marianne is a

freshman in high school. She is an

honor student and wants to sing in

the choir. When she arrives at choir

practice, the teacher tells her she

must take a drug test if she wants to

participate in any extra-curricular

activities. Marianne refuses and is

kicked out of choir.

S C E N A R I O 9

A man suspected of a violent crime

is brought in to the police station.

e alleged victim picks him out of a

lineup as the man who attacked her.

Police inform him that he has the

right to refuse to answer questions,

but they do not oer to let him speak

to a lawyer. Aer being questioned

for two hours, the man admits the

crime.

S C E N A R I O 1 0

Elizabeth is twelve years old. Her

parents are very religious, but she

is not. Once a week, Elizabeth’s

parents make her come with them

to their place of worship. Elizabeth

always says she does not want to go,

but her parents make her come with

them anyway.

S C E N A R I O 1 1

Members of Congress are unhappy

with students’ standardized test

scores. ey pass a federal law that

abolishes local school boards and

requires a national, standardized

curriculum.

S C E N A R I O 1 2

A public school principal smells smoke

in the hallway, and believes it is coming

from the girls’ bathroom. She walks

into the bathroom and nds Susan

standing by the sink. She suspects

Susan has been smoking, and demands

to search her purse for cigarettes or

other evidence of smoking.

According to the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution, there are three items that are considered the supreme law of the land.

The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land and that state laws and constitutions must comply with these federal laws.

The first item that is considered the supreme law of the land is the Constitution itself. The Constitution is the foundational document of the United States, and it sets out the basic structure and principles of the federal government. The second item that is considered the supreme law of the land is federal law.

These laws are enacted by Congress and signed into law by the President. They cover a wide range of topics, from criminal law to environmental law to healthcare. Federal laws apply to everyone in the United States, regardless of which state they live in. The third item that is considered the supreme law of the land is treaties. Treaties are agreements between the United States and other nations. They cover a variety of topics, from trade to defense to human rights. Treaties are negotiated by the President and must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate.

To know more about Supremacy Clause

https://brainly.com/question/1481445

#SPJ11

The ultimate objective of the investigation, according to Captain Cochran, is to locate tangible evidence.

Establishing pertinent facts to support or refute allegations of fraud and corruption is the goal of an investigation. It is a legally mandated fact-finding process that is carried out in an objective, impartial manner with the goal of establishing the pertinent facts and making recommendations in this regard.

In the context of law enforcement, an interrogation is when a representative of the organization questions suspects, victims, or witnesses in order to learn more about a crime. The resolution of the crime is the ultimate goal of an interrogation. A suspect may be questioned for a short while or for several hours.

According to Captain Cochran, finding physical evidence exists the highest purpose of the investigation.

Therefore, the correct answer is option a) To find physical evidence.

To learn more about investigation refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/25578076

#SPJ4

Answer: ok he did it

Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.

Answer:

One major law enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. The ACA was passed in 2010 with the aim of improving access to healthcare, reducing healthcare costs, and enhancing the quality of care for all Americans.

Several factors promoted the legislation of the ACA. One key factor was the high number of uninsured individuals in the United States, which left many people without access to necessary medical services. The rising costs of healthcare and the challenges faced by individuals with pre-existing conditions in obtaining affordable coverage were also driving forces behind the ACA.

The ACA has various provisions that directly impact the health of older adults. It provides new protections for older Americans by prohibiting insurance companies from denying coverage or charging higher premiums based on age. The law also expands Medicaid, which benefits low-income older adults who may have previously struggled to afford healthcare.

Furthermore, the ACA introduced measures to enhance preventive care for older adults, such as free screenings and vaccinations. It established the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit, allowing seniors to receive preventive services and personalized prevention plans at no additional cost. The ACA also implemented changes to Medicare's prescription drug coverage, aiming to reduce out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications.

Overall, the ACA has had a significant impact on the health of older adults by expanding access to affordable healthcare, improving preventive services, and addressing some of the financial burdens associated with aging and healthcare costs. However, it remains a complex and debated law, and its implementation and effects continue to be evaluated and discussed.

Explanation:

One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA). What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.

One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law in 2010. The ACA was designed to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage for Americans, including older adults.

What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Before the ACA, many older adults were unable to afford health insurance due to their age and pre-existing conditions, which made it difficult to access necessary medical care.

The ACA addressed this issue by prohibiting insurers from charging older adults more for coverage based on their age, and by expanding access to Medicaid for low-income individuals and families.

As a result, older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.

Additionally, the ACA also established the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which is responsible for testing new payment and service delivery models that aim to improve the quality of care for older adults while reducing healthcare costs.

Read more about ACA at https://brainly.com/question/29793469

#SPJ11

Answer:

Bile helps with digestion. It breaks down fats into fatty acids, which can be taken into the body by the digestive tract.

The transmission of the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals is the responsibility of the circuit clerk. The clerk is also responsible for furnishing the appellant with a docketing statement form.

The circuit clerk is responsible for sending the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals. According to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 11(b), the appellant must furnish the circuit clerk with a docketing statement form. In most cases, the record is forwarded to the appellate court within 10 days of the appeal. However, in some instances, the appellant must provide transcripts of the trial proceedings, which may take time.

The transmission of the record is crucial in that it provides the appellate court with an accurate representation of what transpired during the lower court proceedings. The record usually contains trial transcripts, evidence, exhibits, and pleadings. It is worth noting that the transmission of the record must be done within the stipulated time frame, which is usually 30 days after the notice of appeal is filed. Failure to adhere to this time frame may lead to the dismissal of the appeal.

Learn more about the court from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ11

In Act 2, Scene 1 of Hamlet, Polonius sends Reynaldo to spy on Laertes in Paris.

In Act 2, Scene 1 of Hamlet, Polonius sends Reynaldo to spy on Laertes in Paris.

In Act 2, Scene 1 of Hamlet, Polonius, the chief counselor to the King, sends his servant Reynaldo to spy on his son Laertes, who is studying in Paris. Polonius wants Reynaldo to gather information about Laertes' behavior and reputation in the city. He instructs Reynaldo to spread false rumors and ask leading questions to the people who know Laertes, aiming to uncover any potential misconduct or dishonorable activities.

This scene serves multiple purposes within the play. Firstly, it emphasizes Polonius' tendency to be overly cautious and suspicious, highlighting his meddling nature. It also reveals his lack of trust in his own son and his desire to control and manipulate him, even from a distance. Additionally, this scene provides an opportunity for Shakespeare to explore themes of deceit, betrayal, and the consequences of eavesdropping.

To delve deeper into Act 2, Scene 1 of Hamlet, it is essential to understand Polonius' character and his role in the play. Polonius is a highly opinionated and cunning character who often acts as a source of comic relief. However, his actions also have significant consequences and contribute to the tragic events that unfold in the play. Understanding Polonius' motivations and the dynamics between him and his family members, particularly his son Laertes, sheds light on the complexities of their relationships and the underlying tensions that drive the plot forward.

Learn more about Polonius

brainly.com/question/13525733

#SPJ11

The Anti-Federalists expressed several concerns about the proposed Constitution and argued for certain measures to address those concerns.

Here are the key points you mentioned, along with an explanation: Checks and Balances: The Anti-Federalists believed that the checks and balances among the branches of government outlined in the Constitution would not be sufficient to prevent the consolidation of power. They feared that without stronger limitations, one branch could dominate the others, leading to an overly powerful central government.

State Sovereignty: The Anti-Federalists were concerned that the Constitution would diminish the authority and autonomy of individual states. They believed that a strong central government would undermine the ability of states to govern themselves and protect their own interests. They argued for greater state sovereignty and more explicit protections for states' rights.

Individual Rights: The Anti-Federalists contended that the Constitution lacked a comprehensive Bill of Rights. They emphasized the importance of protecting individual liberties from potential government abuses and believed that a formal enumeration of rights was necessary to safeguard the people from both the federal government and from each other.

Republican Government: The Anti-Federalists generally supported the idea of a republican form of government, which is characterized by elected representatives who act on behalf of the people. They believed that a republic was the most effective system for protecting individual freedoms and preventing the concentration of power.

In response to these concerns, the Federalists, who supported the ratification of the Constitution, agreed to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which would explicitly protect individual liberties and address the Anti-Federalists' worries about potential government encroachments. The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was subsequently added to the Constitution in 1791.

Ultimately, the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists shaped the compromise and compromises that led to the ratification of the Constitution, resulting in a stronger federal government while also establishing a system of checks and balances and protections for individual rights within a republican framework.

To know more about ,antifederalists click here:https://brainly.com/question/13838143

#SPJ11

Answer:

fixed price contracts and cost-reimbursement contracts

The concept of asset forfeiture can raise concerns regarding its compatibility with the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

Asset forfeiture involves the seizure of property by law enforcement agencies, often in connection with criminal activity. Some argue that certain practices of asset forfeiture, such as excessive fines or disproportionate seizures, may violate the principles of proportionality and fairness outlined in the 8th Amendment.

The 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and is intended to ensure that punishments fit the crime. When examining the concept of asset forfeiture, questions arise regarding its alignment with this constitutional principle. Critics argue that the seizure of property, particularly in cases where the value of the assets exceeds the alleged offense, can be seen as excessive and disproportionate.

While asset forfeiture aims to combat illegal activities and disrupt criminal networks, concerns are raised when innocent individuals or individuals with minimal involvement in criminal activity experience significant financial losses. Critics argue that such practices can create a punitive impact that goes beyond what is considered just or proportionate.

The compatibility of asset forfeiture with the 8th Amendment is an ongoing subject of debate and legal scrutiny. Courts have grappled with determining when asset forfeiture practices cross the line into being excessive or constitute a violation of constitutional rights. Balancing the need for law enforcement tools against the rights of individuals is a complex challenge that requires careful consideration and ongoing evaluation to ensure compliance with the principles of the 8th Amendment.

Learn more about asset forfeiture here:

https://brainly.com/question/32217803

#SPJ11

Answer:

The direction the suspect ran, visual descriptions of suspect , and if he said anything to the women

The suspect's running direction, any visual descriptions of him, and whether or not he made any comments to the women.

Information on the visual appearance of places, things, people, and more is provided via visual descriptions. The phrase "visual description" can refer to both image and audio descriptions as well as real-time descriptions of the visual environment of a place, person, or space.

An image description gives someone with a print disability, such as the blind or visually impaired, the same or equal information that a sighted reader would obtain when they look at a picture. Alt-text and Long Description are two formats in which image descriptions can be inserted in digital content.

Thus, The suspect's running direction, any visual descriptions of him.

For more information about visual descriptions, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3399699

#SPJ2

Hello. You forgot and put the graph to which this question refers. The chart is attached below:

Answer:

42.354%

Explanation:

To answer this question it is necessary to make a very simple calculation that relates the total number of judgments by jury to the number of civil cases judged by juris. In this case, you must analyze the last line of the graph and use the following values in the calculation.

5082 ---- 100%

2154 ----- x

x = (2154 * 100) / 5082

x = 42.354%

The vast majority of cases heard in U.S. District Courts are civil cases. Civil cases involve disputes between private parties or organizations, such as contract disputes, personal injury claims, employment discrimination cases, and intellectual property disputes.

U.S. District Courts are federal trial courts that handle a wide range of cases, including both civil and criminal matters. However, civil cases make up the majority of the caseload in these courts. These cases typically involve seeking monetary damages or other forms of relief rather than criminal prosecution.

On the other hand, criminal cases involve offenses against the government and are prosecuted by the government. They include crimes such as fraud, theft, drug trafficking, and violent crimes. While criminal cases receive significant attention in the media due to their nature, they constitute a smaller portion of the caseload in U.S. District Courts compared to civil cases. The exact distribution of cases may vary across different districts and jurisdictions, but civil cases generally make up the majority of the workload in U.S. District Courts.

Learn more about discrimination cases here:

brainly.com/question/13400211

#SPJ11

Answer:

Tracking one of his couriers.

Explanation:

Information was collected from Guantanamo Bay detainees, who gave intelligence officers the courier's pseudonym as Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, and said a protege of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Answer:

The answer is $5,700.

Explanation:

With an income of $ 60,000, the tax payer is at 350% of the Federal Poverty Level or FPL, so the normal expected contribution is 9.5% of his income.

The normal expected contribution = 9.5% of his income

                                                        = 60000*9.5%

                                                        = $5,700

Therefore, The taxpayer's normal expected contribution when calculating the refundable tax credit for which the taxpayer may be eligible under the ppaca to purchase a qualified health plan is $5,700.

Law is different from a norm because The law is a structured, written standard that protects an individual's capacity and strictly requires that it be upheld.While the norm is the broad rule that governs society before the laws of morality and the law are in place.

Difference between law and norm?

To know more about law and norm visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8224362

#SPJ9

Answer: True

Explanation:

Every defendant has the right proof his or her innocence in the court of law supported by necessary evidences, and witnesses. The court of law is also designated to provide defendant own lawyer when the person is not able to hire one. No defendant can give false statement against oneself. Until all facts related to the case are not clear and they do not go against the defendant till then the defendant is innocent in the court of law.

Answer:

1. False

4. True

5. True

Explanation:

This is all I know :)

The vicarious responsibility is based on (D)  Respondeat superior.

Vicarious responsibility refers to a legal doctrine that holds one party responsible for the actions or omissions of another party. It is based on the principle of "Respondeat superior," which means "let the master answer" in Latin. This doctrine is primarily applied in the context of employer-employee relationships, where an employer may be held liable for the actions of their employees performed within the scope of their employment.

Respondeat's superior holds that employers are vicariously responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts committed by their employees while carrying out their job duties. This means that if an employee causes harm or damage to someone else due to their actions or negligence during the course of their employment, the employer can be held legally accountable for the employee's actions.

The concept of respondeat superior is based on the idea that employers have a degree of control and authority over their employees, and therefore, they should bear the responsibility for any harm caused by their employees' actions within the scope of their employment.

In contrast, the other options are not directly related to the concept of vicarious responsibility:

A. Proximate cause refers to the legal concept that establishes a close connection between the defendant's actions and the resulting harm.

B. Consent decree is a legal agreement reached between parties to resolve a dispute without admission of guilt or liability.

C. Duty of care refers to the legal obligation to act in a manner that avoids causing harm to others.

Therefore, the correct answer for vicarious responsibility is (D) Respondeat superior, as it specifically relates to the liability of employers for the actions of their employees. Therefore, the correct option is D.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

Which of the following is vicarious responsibility based on? Select one.

Question 9 options:

A. Proximate cause

B. Consent decree

C. Duty of care

D. Respondeat superior

Know more about Respondeat superior here:

https://brainly.com/question/32243532

#SPJ8

All of the above options refers to a  "firm" for California purposes.

What is a Firm?

A firm is a business organization, such as a corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship, that is engaged in commercial, industrial, or professional activities. The term can also refer to the owners of a business organization, who are usually referred to as the firm's owners or principals.

What is California purposes?

California purposes is a phrase used to refer to laws and regulations that apply specifically to California. This includes legislation, regulations, and court decisions that are specific to California, as opposed to federal laws and regulations applicable to the entire United States.

To know more about a firm,

https://brainly.com/question/28457190

#SPJ4

The primary evidence in cases involving crimes against persons is the testimony of witnesses or victims.

Hence Option a is correct.

Crimes against persons, such as assault or battery, often rely on the testimony of the individuals involved in order to establish what happened and who was responsible. This is because there may not be any physical evidence, such as fingerprints or DNA, that can be used to identify the perpetrator. In these cases, the testimony of witnesses or victims is crucial in determining the outcome of the case.

In contrast, victimless crimes, such as drug possession or prostitution, typically do not involve the testimony of witnesses or victims. Similarly, property crimes, such as theft or vandalism, may rely on physical evidence rather than witness testimony. Dismissed cases are those that have been dropped or thrown out, and therefore do not require any evidence at all.

In summary, the correct answer is a) crimes against persons.

For more similar questions on testimony:

brainly.com/question/27859025

#SPJ11

Answer:

The peoples pov of the government

Explanation:

:)

In writing Paragraphs you must consider the structure of the Paragraphs, Paragraphs contain three main parts:

Generally, In written language, a paragraph is a group of sentences that discuss a single topic. Paragraphs are used to help organize written text and make it easier for readers to understand the main points being made.

They are typically marked by a new line and an indentation at the beginning of the first sentence. Paragraphs can be of varying lengths, but it is generally recommended to keep them relatively short, as long paragraphs can be difficult for readers to follow.

As the sun set on the horizon, the sky was painted in a beautiful array of orange and pink hues. The air was cool and crisp, and a gentle breeze rustled the leaves of the trees.

A small stream gurgled nearby, and the sound of birds chirping filled the air. It was the perfect evening to sit outside and enjoy nature's beauty.

Read more about the Paragraphs

https://brainly.com/question/24460908

#SPJ1

Answer: sample answer is the following below

1. Explaining checks and balances

A. Definition of checks and balances in my own words

B. Example of checks and balances

2. The idea of this principle in the preamble

A. Quotation from the preamble

B. Explanation of the quotation

Explanation:

edge 2023

Explanation:

.......................................

Answer: traffic

Explanation:

Explanati

La revisión de procesos permite además hacer funcionar a la organización en un marco de previsibilidad ya que brinda la información necesaria para adelantarse a futuros problemas, generado los inputs precisos para tomar las decisiones adecuadas en el momento justo

Input es una palabra corta que significa "frases que lees y escuchas

espero y te sirva

Answer:

background resources.