"Recognizing patterns of cause and effect is an important analytical skill that allows historians to explain why things happened the way they did in the past. It's also a strategy that can make it possible to predict what may happen in the future."
UwU
Answer:
Studying the past means we need to find the reason and cause of the past event, and how these causes are related with the occurrence(relationship). In additional, we might also need to find bias of these events.
Explanation:
Call me Lei Feng.
what were Genghis Khan's goals? List 5 of them.
Why did President Wilson ask Congress to declare war on Germany in World War I?
Responses
Germany was sinking many nonmilitary U.S. ships.
Many German immigrants lived in the United States.
The United States hoped to gain new colonies in Europe.
Businessmen hoped to make money rebuilding Europe.
Answer:
It's A for sure
Explanation:
I picked A and its correct
Answer: A. Germany was sinking many nonmilitary U.S. ships.
Explanation: One reason was that Germany's policy of unrestricted submarine warfare posed a significant threat to U.S. interests. German U-boats were attacking and sinking nonmilitary U.S. ships, causing the loss of American lives and disrupting trade. This aggression by Germany was seen as a direct threat to U.S. national security and prompted President Wilson to seek a declaration of war on April 2, 1917. This resulted in a vote that brought the US into War World 1.
An example of this was on May 7, 1915 when the German Navy attacked the British ship Lusitania, which killed over 1,200 passengers including 128 Americans.
President Wilson also believed that the US could benefit monetarily from a war in Europe.
Learn more about President Wilson's declaration of war here: https://brainly.com/question/34176653.
How much of the world did a serf typically see, and why?
How can impeachment preserve democracy, and how can it be used to corrupt it?
Answer:
Impeachment is to keep everything uncompromised but can also be biased
Explanation:
Impeachment of a president and or any other political seat is a way to uphold the law it's a checks and balances rule. It can be used to preserve democracy due to the fact that if said leader wants to go against what the law says you can get rid of them. On the other hand it can be used to slander somebody and try to force the government to lean against somebody due to its threatening nature
The impeachment preserve democracy, there was not in the uncompromised are in the biased are in the shown of the corrupt it.
What is democracy?
The term democracy refers to the independence. The citizen of the country are right to choose the appropriate government. The citizen is various right to freedom of the country. There are various country to well-developed and based on democracy. The citizen is main right to vote, and equal right to male and female.
Impeachment of a president or other political office is a method of enforcing the law. It is a rule of checks and balances. It can be utilized to safeguard democracy because if a leader decides to contravene the law, they can be removed. On the other hand, because of its menacing tone, it can be used to malign someone and try to force the government to side with them.
Learn more about on government, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ2
The English philosopher John Locke wrote that
A. all people have the natural right to life and liberty.
B. only governments could provide rights to citizens.
C. a government should hold absolute power over its people.
D. all men are created equal.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
John Locke was part of the enlightenment movement in which people began questioning the church... he proposed the draft of fundamental constitution for the government of Carolina in 1669 which guaranteed freedom to life and liberty along with freedom of religion.. especially atheist which was strongly condoned by the church at the time
for many middle-class americans, the major labor upheavals of the late nineteenth century select one: a. were evidence that the inequalities of capitalism needed to be addressed. b. drew little interest outside of large urban cities. c. were clear indications of the excessive power of monopolies. d. suggested that a labor party, if founded, might eventually capture the presidency. e. were dangerous signs of social instability.
For many middle-class Americans, the major labor upheavals of the late nineteenth century : were dangerous signs of social instability.
In 1886, Chicago was the middle for another labor upheaval. Roughly 88,000 laborers in 307 separate strikes requested the eight-hour day that year, the vast majority of them on May 1. Industry was incapacitated, and the city "expected a time of rest like appearance." The Haymarket Undertaking of May 4 set off broad antilabor constraint. Besides, the disappointment of the development to spread much past Chicago made it simpler for bosses who contended in public business sectors to overlook labor demands.
As the tide of the extraordinary upheaval subsided in the last part of the 1880s, the personality of strikes started to change. Up to that point, strikes frequently prepared enormous quantities of workers for everyone inside ethnic networks like Irish Bridgeport and Bohemian Pilsen. Effortlessly supplanted untalented laborers, specifically, depended on swarm activities to scare strikebreakers.
to know more about labor demands click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23987753
#SPJ4
Why were some people concerned about the new pop culture and "global village" in the 1960s?
They did not believe an international pop culture was good for nations' economies.
They thought that a “global village" might become one large communist nation.
They were concerned that local cultures would disappear in an international pop culture.
They believed a new pop culture would generate more distrust among nations.
option (c), In the 1960s, some people were worried about the "global village" and the new pop culture because they thought local cultures would be displaced by a multinational pop culture.
Is the idea of the "global community" still merely an idea, or has it already come to pass? Why not, if not?Depending on how you look at it, some believe that we still reside in a hypothetical global village and will do so for as long as we uphold our national spirit and don't share a single identity, while others believe that globalization has transformed us into a global community.
What in today's society best symbolizes pop culture, and why is it so significant?Pop culture is important to American society because it offers us a unique sense of national identity, helps us to bridge our numerous gaps, and unites us with other people from a similarly diverse nation.
Learn more about global village: https://brainly.com/question/30946871
#SPJ1
why was the formation of the Indian National Congress inevitable?
What major population trend occurred in the US during the Industrial Revolution? The number of people working on farms increased. Migration from cities to rural areas increased The flow of immigrants to US cities decreased The size and number of major US cities increased.
The correct answer is D) The size and number of major US cities increased.
The major population trend that occurred in the US during the Industrial Revolution was "The size and number of major US cities increased."
With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, many things changed. Indeed, the Industrial Revolution changed the life of many people.
Farmers that used to work in their farm fields decided to leave the rural areas of the country to move to the larger cities where the big industries and factories were located. Immigrants also arrived because they were looking for better living conditions.
That is why the larger cities saw an increase in population. These workers labored for long hours under unhealthy conditions and lived in overcrowded spaces where disease quickly spread.
Help i really need help
Answer: u didnt put the question here arent u wasting pts.?
Answer:
i dont know the answer next time put the qustion up there
Explanation:
What is one way that activism differs from advocacy? Advocacy happens mostly through petitions, and activism happens mostly through marches. Advocacy works within government, and activism creates change outside of the government. Activism works to address problems on a local level, and advocacy addresses national issues. Activism is mostly done by government officials, and advocacy is mostly done by everyday citizens.
please hurry!!! timed quiz!!!
One way that activism differs from advocacy is that activism creates change outside of the government, while advocacy works within the government.
Activism is often characterized by direct action and mobilization of individuals or groups to bring attention to and address a social or political issue. Activists may engage in protests, boycotts, and other forms of nonviolent resistance to pressure those in power to take action.On the other hand, advocacy involves influencing government policy and decision-making through lobbying, petitioning, and other forms of communication with elected officials and government agencies. Advocates may work to shape legislation or regulations that address a particular issue or advocate for changes in government policies or practices.While activism and advocacy can both be effective in bringing about social and political change, they often operate through different channels and strategies.
To learn more about government click the link below:
brainly.com/question/9386829
#SPJ1
Can someone tell me the most historically significant individual or group that few people know in the US history
The painting depicts the United States celebrating its
Answer:
D. Control of Lousiana.
the United States took formal possession of the Louisiana Territory from France on December 20,1803.
An explanation of the powers that Congress has under the Articles of Confederation
Answer:
Any act of Congress required the votes of nine of the thirteen states to pass. Congress claimed the following powers: to make war and peace; conduct foreign affairs; request men and money from the states; coin and borrow money; regulate Indian affairs; and settle disputes among the states.
Explanation:
In The Rise of Genghis Khan
Describe life as a Mongol
Relations and Political alliances between tribes:
Relations between Mongols and other civilizations
Here are some key aspects of life as a Mongol warrior and leader:
• Mongol society was largely based on tribal allegiances and loyalties. Genghis Khan unified several rival tribes under his rule, but tribal ties were still important. Mongol leaders had to maintain good relations with the leaders of other tribes to build alliances. These alliances were crucial for military campaigns, trade, and resolving disputes.
• Life was hard and violence was common. As a warrior tribe, the Mongols frequently engaged in raids, skirmishes, and all-out warfare with other tribes. Both men and women knew hardship and loss of life. Most Mongols lived a nomadic lifestyle, moving with their animals.
• There were clear hierarchies and rules of submission. Mongol society was highly stratified with the Khan at the top, followed by nobles, generals, soldiers, and serfs. Everyone had to show unconditional obedience to those of higher status. Disobedience could be punished cruelly.
• Relations with other civilizations were varied. The Mongols were willing to absorb conquered peoples into their ranks, as long as they showed submission. Some were given privileged status. But the Mongols also frequently massacred populations who resisted them. Their aim was generally to loot resources and demand tributes from the peoples they conquered.
• Life revolved around the army, warfare, horsemanship, hunting, and raiding. The Mongol army was a mobile society, and life as a warrior was hard. horses were central to Mongol life, used for transportation, warfare, hunting, and more. Most Mongol men were accomplished horsemen and hunters from a young age.
• There were complex rituals and beliefs regarding religion, spirituality, and the afterlife. Mongols practiced a form of shamanism and animism, with a belief in spirits, reincarnation, and the importance of living a virtuous life to achieve a good afterlife. But Mongol rulers also adopted elements of other faiths like Tibetan Buddhism.
That covers some of the key aspects of life as a Mongol warrior and leader. Let me know if you have any other questions!
How do you feel about the constitution? Do you agree or disagree with it?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not specify to what Constitution you are referring to, we are going to assume that you are talking about the United States Constitution.
How do you feel about the constitution? Do you agree or disagree with it?
I feel good with the laws stated in the United States Constitution. I think it is a great Constitution because it included the obligations and laws, but also the people's rights.
That was the idea of the framers of the Constitution and the founding fathers. To create a series of laws and legislation that could stand the test of time. Years later, after the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights that is the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution.
So basically I agree with the Constitution.
The issue with the Constitution is that it is not a matter of questioning the quality of the Constitution, because it is a good one. The issue is about the enforcement of the articles and laws that are included in the Constitution.
What were the words on the flag that flew by the cannon at the Battle of Gonzales?
Answer:
As Moore returned to camp, the Texians raised a homemade white banner with an image of the cannon painted in black in the center, over the words "Come and Take It". The makeshift flag evoked the American Revolutionary-era slogan "Don't Tread on Me". Texians then fired their cannon at the Mexican camp.
which statement best describes what english colonist did when they set up colonies in north america
Option A. The best description is that They built farms and towns on land that American Indians used for hunting and collecting plants.
Who were the English Colonists?These were the persons that had led Europe from England and traveled to the Americas in order to set up a life their.
A lot of them took over the lands that belonged to the natives when they arrived and settled there.
Read more on English colonists here:
https://brainly.com/question/18365734
#SPJ1
Complete questionWhich statement best describes what English colonists did when they set up colonies in North America?
answer choices
They built farms and towns on land that American Indians used for hunting and collecting plants.
The built small settlements that focused on spreading Christianity.
They built small trading communities and treated American Indians with respect.
They often married indigenous people and also forced some American Indians to work for them
what is one way the constitution limits the powers of the federal goverment.APEX
Answer:
they give powers to the state government.
Explanation:
What was an effect of American expansionism?
The United States became a world power.
The United States got into wars with England and France.
The United States became concerned about its military effectiveness.
The United States spread democracy to Cuba and the Philippines.
Answer: The correct option among the given choices is: The United States became a world power.
American expansionism, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, played a significant role in transforming the United States into a global power. Through expansionist policies such as the annexation of new territories and overseas acquisitions, the United States extended its influence and presence beyond its continental borders. Notable examples include the acquisition of territories such as Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines.
These expansionist endeavors brought the United States into closer engagement with global affairs, both politically and economically. The United States emerged as a major player in international politics and began to exert its influence on a global scale. This newfound status as a world power helped shape the United States' foreign policy, military strategies, and its overall role on the world stage.
7. What did the Nazi's "feed" off of?
Answer:
The belief that they were the superior race.
Explanation:
explain the steps that a court case takes to get to the US Supreme Court 
The path a court case takes to reach the U.S. Supreme Court typically involves several steps, as outlined below:
Trial Court: The case begins in a trial court, where the initial proceedings, including fact-finding, witness testimonies, and presentation of evidence, take place. The trial court's decision may be appealed if either party is dissatisfied with the outcome.Appellate Court: If an appeal is filed, the case moves to an appellate court. The appellate court reviews the trial court's decision to ensure that the legal procedures were followed correctly and the law was applied appropriately. The appellate court can affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.Petition for Writ of Certiorari: If either party disagrees with the appellate court's decision, they can file a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, it is important to note that the Supreme Court has discretion in choosing which cases to hear and typically only accepts a small fraction of the petitions submitted.Supreme Court Review: If the Supreme Court grants certiorari, it reviews the case. The Court examines the legal issues presented, reviews briefs and arguments from both parties, and may request additional information or oral arguments.Supreme Court Decision: After reviewing the case, the Supreme Court renders a decision. The decision can affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision, establishing legal precedent that lower courts must follow.It is important to note that not all cases make it to the Supreme Court, as the Court typically selects cases that involve significant legal or constitutional issues or cases where lower courts have reached conflicting decisions.For more such questions on Court
https://brainly.com/question/30451123
#SPJ8
WhT are some Donald trump major events of life?
jan 20, 2017 got inaugrated
jan 27, 2017 travel ban
mar 28, 2017 reversal on environmental protection
may 17, 2017 Robert Muller chosen as special counsel
aug 21, 2017 US increases presence in Afghanistan
what was significant about the fact that the king of babylon changed the names of the four hebrew exiles that were brought to babylon in daniel 1?
The significant about the fact that The imposition of Babylon names, some of which incorporate the names of Babylonian gods, is one of the features forced on these four young Hebrew males.
For the Babylonians, this was more of a convenience than an ideological issue, but for the Hebrews, who thought that a person's character and future could be predicted by their name, it was undoubtedly very challenging.
The leader of the four young men in this situation is Daniel. He is the one who has a strong conviction about a potential defilement and who approaches the official in charge of looking after them.
Daniel and his comrades have endured exile, a name change, and instruction in Babylonian esoteric knowledge.
To know more about Babylon visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2325742
#SPJ4
The Christmas bombing _____.
A- was to show South Vietnam that the United States was on its side
B- was ordered by President Johnson
C- was carried out in December 1973
D- was carried out over South Vietnam
Answer:
Correct answer is A- was to show South Vietnam that the United States was on its side
Explanation:
A is correct as US wanted to show that they are still supporting South Vietnam after the meeting between Kissinger and Le Duc Tho in Paris.
B is not correct as it was ordered by president Nixon.
C is not correct as it was carried out in December of 1972.
D is not correct as it was carried out over North Vietnam.
What is the best title for this map?
A
Sources and Destinations of Enslaved Africans
B
Gold and Spice Trade Routes
C
Portuguese Trade Exploration Routes
D
Obstacles to Colonization of the Western Hemisphere
B
Gold and Spice Trade Routes
1. Why was King Tut's body preserved as a mummy?
Because the ancient Egyptians believed in the afterlife, King Tutankhamun, also referred to as King Tut, was kept as a mummy. The ancient Egyptians held the view that transitioning from this life to the next after death meant that a person may continue to exist eternally. The Egyptians thought that in order for the soul to return to the body, the body needed to be preserved for this afterlife.
Who was King Tut?He was a relatively obscure and insignificant pharaoh, but British archaeologist Howard Carter found his tomb in 1922. It was filled with a vast amount of burial goods, including the king's entire mummy.In addition to the abundance of grave items that were unearthed, King Tut's tomb is regarded as one of the most important archaeological finds of the 20th century because it was the first time an intact pharaonic tomb was recovered. The discovery of his mummies allowed for an analysis of the embalming procedures and offered a glimpse of the mysterious young monarch himself.To know more about King Tut, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28874653
#SPJ1
which power does the constitution specifically deny to state governments?
The Constitution denies state governments the power to multiple things, such as making treaties with foreign governments, taxing foreign ships, taxing imports or exports, and coining money (thats about what i can think of off the top of my head)
Power that are specifically deny to state governments includes power to:
coin moneymake treaties with foreign statesimpose duties and taxes on importsWhat are denied power?These are power that the constitution prevent the branch of government from carrying out.
In conclusion, the power to coin money, make treaties with foreign states and impose duties and taxes on imports are specifically deny to state governments .
Read more about denied power
brainly.com/question/16784066
#SPJ2
According to Bossuet, what would happen if there was no absolute leader?
Answer:
Everything would fall into peices and there would be absolute confusion
Explanation:
this is because nobody has a real means of where to go and what to do, because nobody would be leading.
Which diagram best explains how American Indian cultures were shaped by their environments before the arrival of Europeans?
Option D . best explains how American Indian cultures were shaped by their environments before the arrival of Europeans
How were American Indian cultures were shaped by their environments before the arrival of Europeans?Before the arrival of Europeans, American Indian cultures were shaped by their environments in various ways. The indigenous peoples of the Americas developed diverse and intricate societies that adapted to their specific geographical, climatic, and ecological conditions. Here are some ways in which American Indian cultures were influenced by their environments:
Subsistence and Adaptation: American Indian cultures developed subsistence strategies tailored to their environments.
Read more on cultures here:https://brainly.com/question/25010777
#SPJ1