Answers
The Supreme Court's Worcester v. Georgia decision set a precedent. Despite the fact that it did not stop the Cherokee from being expelled from their country, the judgement was frequently cited when creating later Indian law in the United States.
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom serves as the country final court of appeal in all civil disputes as well as criminal cases that have their origins in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Additionally, it hears cases with widespread public or constitutional ramifications. The Middlesex Guildhall in Westminster is where the Court typically meets, but it can convene anywhere. For instance, it has met in the Edinburgh City Chambers, the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast, and the T-Hywel Building in Cardiff. The Highest Court of the United Kingdom is far more constrained in its ability to conduct judicial review than the supreme or constitutional courts of some other nations because of the idea of parliamentary sovereignty. It cannot invalidate any fundamental laws.
Learn more about Supreme Court from
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Related Questions
How does this help you understand the hierarchy of the courts and what you can do as a citizen on trial?
Answers
It is crucial to consult with legal professionals who have expertise in the relevant jurisdiction to understand the specific rights and steps available to citizens on trial.
Understanding the hierarchy of the courts is essential for citizens involved in the legal system, as it helps navigate the judicial process and know the appropriate steps to take when on trial. Here's how the court hierarchy works and what citizens can do when facing a trial:
1. Court Hierarchy:
- Trial Courts: At the base of the hierarchy are trial courts, where legal proceedings begin. These courts handle cases at the initial level, where evidence is presented, and decisions are made based on the facts of the case and applicable laws.
- Appellate Courts: Above trial courts are appellate courts, which review decisions made by the trial courts. Appellate courts assess whether errors of law occurred during the trial or if there were procedural irregularities. They do not re-evaluate the facts or conduct new trials. Instead, they focus on matters of law and ensure proper application of legal principles.
- Supreme Court (or Highest Court): At the top of the hierarchy is the highest court in the jurisdiction, often known as the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals (depending on the country). The highest court generally reviews cases that involve significant legal issues or conflicts in interpretation of the law. Its decisions set precedents and have a binding effect on lower courts.
2. As a Citizen on Trial:
- Know Your Rights: As a citizen on trial, it is crucial to understand your rights. This includes the right to legal representation, the right to remain silent, the right to a fair trial, and the right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
- Seek Legal Counsel: It is advisable to seek legal counsel to guide you through the legal process, ensure your rights are protected, and provide expertise in building your defense.
- Present Your Case: During trial proceedings, you can present evidence, call witnesses, and testify in your defense. Your legal counsel will help you navigate the process and present your case effectively.
- Appeal if Necessary: If dissatisfied with the outcome of the trial, you may have the right to appeal the decision. Contract with your attorney to determine if there are grounds for an appeal based on errors of law or procedural irregularities.
It is important to note that specific legal procedures and rights may vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system in which the trial takes place.
Therefore, it is crucial to consult with legal professionals who have expertise in the relevant jurisdiction to understand the specific rights and steps available to citizens on trial.
learn more about contract here: brainly.com/question/32254040
#SPJ11
I will give the BRAINIEST
Do you think that the United States should have life imprisonment without parole for children? Explain. How does the speaker feel about this issue?
Answers
No I don't think the United States should have life imprisonment without parole for children. ... otherwise you're basically throwing away their life before they've had a chance to live it. The speaker is greatly against this issue and I agree with him.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
100
20
10
50
Answers
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.
The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.
It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.
The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.
To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:
https://brainly.com/question/27878011
#SPJ4
Correct question:
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
a) 100
b) 20
c) 10
d) 50
______ is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
Answers
The power of judicial review is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
Constitutionality is defined as the state of being in line with the laws or provisions of the applicable constitution;[1] it is also the status of a legislation, a procedure, or an act being in conformity with those laws or provisions. They are unconstitutional when policies, practices, or actions directly contravene the constitution. Unless a government has a system in place for declaring legislation unlawful, all other laws are regarded as constitutional.
A measure passed as law by the national legislature or a lower-level legislature, like the legislature of a state or province, may be ruled to be unconstitutional. The constitution, which is the document that defines the government, also contains laws that must be upheld by governments.
Learn more about judicial branch here
https://brainly.com/question/9696040
#SPJ4
Case 4.3, Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P., involved a Mariners fan, Delinda Middleton Taylor, who was injured by a baseball that entered the stands during team warm-ups. The issue in the case was a. whether the risk of injury from an errant baseball was foreseeable to a reasonable person with Taylor's familiarity with baseball. b. whether the ball was thrown into the stands intentionally. c. whether Taylor suffered a legally recognizable injury. d. false imprisonment.
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.
describe two ways in which the above laws protects citizens against gbv
Answers
Laws relating to GBV protect citizens in several ways such as:
Punishing perpetrators of GBV. Granting support to victims of GBV. How do laws protect citizens against GBV?Laws against GBV prescribe punishments for those found guilty of engaging in gender-based violence. This acts as a deterrent from the act.
Laws also offer support to those who have gone through GBV to ensure that they can recover from the incident and reassimilate into society.
Find out more on GBV at
https://brainly.com/question/16923564.
#SPJ1
Match each statement with the correct item.
John Peter Zenger
Eighth Amendment
Susan B. Anthony
Fourteenth Amendment
Thomas Jefferson
civil liberties
Nineteenth Amendment
poll tax
bail
unreasonable searches and seizures
required states to grant all citizens “equal protection under the law”
guarantees women the right to vote
involved in a court case supporting freedom of the press
described the establishment clause as a “wall of separation between church and state”
security deposit to encourage attendance in court
a fee paid in order to vote
suffrage leader during the 1800s
prohibited by the Fourth Amendment
freedom to think and act without government interference
protects an accused person from excessive bail
Answers
Answer:
order
Explanation:
poll tax- a fee paid in order to vote.bail- security deposit to encourage attendance in court.civil liberties- freedom to think and act without government interference.19th amendment- woman right to vote. 14th amendment-"equal protection under law"?[not sure for 5] Susan b Anthony- feminist/suffrage leader.8th amendment-protects an accused person from excessive bail. john p zenger- involved a case involving freedom of press. 4th amendment- unreasonable searches and seizures. jefferson- wall of separation between church and statethe which of the following Suggests that al
Solution to all social problems, including crime
traps formation of human beings, mutual deppe-
reduction of class structures. the Creats
ammunities of caring people and unie
Social Justice ?
A Radical theory
B British or left realism
C Peacemaking Crminology
D Femmist theory
Answers
Answer:
U bot
Explanation:
u suck at fortnite if u dont friend me and lets one v one
Benol9
which of the followings aspects of international law would enable a cyber-criminal operating across borders to evade prosecution? Non-existent extradition agreements between 2 countries
Answers
Non-existent extradition agreements between two countries can enable a cyber-criminal operating across borders to evade prosecution.
Extradition is the legal process through which one country surrenders an individual to another country for prosecution or punishment. It allows for the transfer of accused individuals from one jurisdiction to another to face criminal charges. However, in the absence of an extradition agreement between two countries, there is no legal framework to facilitate the extradition process.
For a cyber-criminal operating across borders, the lack of an extradition agreement can provide a safe haven, as they cannot be easily extradited to a country where they committed the crime. This can hinder international cooperation and make it challenging for law enforcement agencies to bring the cyber-criminal to justice.
Without an extradition agreement, the country where the cyber-criminal is residing may not be obligated to hand them over for prosecution, effectively allowing them to evade prosecution and continue their illegal activities.
The absence of extradition agreements between two countries can create loopholes that enable cyber-criminals operating across borders to evade prosecution. International cooperation and the establishment of extradition agreements are crucial in addressing cybercrime and ensuring that offenders are held accountable.
Learn more about law at:
brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ11
which of the following did hb 1337 allow? which of the following did hb 1337 allow? alcoholic beverages are exempt from all excise taxes beer not intended for sale was exempt from excise taxes excise taxes can be charged in proportion to brewery production (i.e. larger brewers paid less per barrel in taxes) none of the above
Answers
HB 1337 allowed the excise taxes to be charged in proportion to brewery production (i.e. larger brewers paid less per barrel in taxes).
HB 1337 refers to a law that was passed in Indiana in 2016, which is also known as the "Dignity for the Unborn Act." The law sought to increase the number of abortion restrictions in the state, with the hope of eventually banning the procedure completely.
It also contained several provisions that were intended to regulate the production and sale of alcohol in Indiana. What did HB 1337 allow? The provision of HB 1337 that is relevant to this question is that it allowed for excise taxes to be charged in proportion to brewery production. This means that larger breweries would pay less per barrel in taxes than smaller breweries, which would be charged more.
The purpose of this provision was to incentivize the growth of larger breweries and to encourage them to produce more beer. What is an excise tax? An excise tax is a tax that is levied on a specific good or service. In the case of the brewing industry, excise taxes are typically levied on the production of beer, and are used to generate revenue for the government. The amount of the tax is typically based on the volume of beer that is produced.
To know more about Excise taxes refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/22358769#
#SPJ11
If unpaid preferred dividends must be "caught up" before any common dividends can be paid, they are called _________ dividends.
Answers
If unpaid preferred dividends must be "caught up" before any common dividends can be paid, they are called cumulative dividends.
Cumulative dividends are a type of preferred stock dividend that accumulates when it is not paid during the normal dividend distribution period.
This means that the unpaid dividends are carried over to the next dividend period and must be paid before any dividends can be paid to common shareholders.
Cumulative dividends are a way for companies to incentivize investors to purchase preferred stock, which generally has a lower dividend rate than common stock.
They provide a level of security to preferred shareholders, ensuring that they will eventually receive their dividend payments, even if the company is experiencing financial difficulties. This is because preferred shareholders have priority over common shareholders when it comes to receiving dividend payments.
In addition, cumulative dividends can be a way for companies to attract long-term investors who are interested in receiving a steady stream of income from their investments.
However, they can also be a burden for companies that are experiencing financial difficulties, as they must prioritize paying off the accumulated dividends before they can distribute any dividends to common shareholders or reinvest in the business.
Overall, cumulative dividends are an important feature of preferred stock that can provide stability and security for investors, but they can also create additional financial obligations for companies.
For more question on "Cumulative Dividends" :
https://brainly.com/question/14971141
#SPJ11
patty principal fired al agent because al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. unless patty notifies the third parties who dealt with al that he is no longer her agent, al will continue to have authority and patty will be bound by his actions.
Answers
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
The type of authority that Al will continue to have depends on the circumstances of his relationship with Patty and the way he presented himself to third parties.
First, it's important to understand that there are four types of authority in agency law: actual authority, apparent authority, implied authority, and incidental authority.
Actual authority refers to the express or implied powers that the principal grants to the agent. Apparent authority arises when the principal creates the appearance of authority in the agent's actions, even if the principal did not actually grant that authority.
Implied authority refers to the powers that are necessary or customary for the agent to carry out the principal's express or apparent instructions. Incidental authority refers to the powers that are incidental to the agent's express or implied authority.
In this case, Patty would be bound by Al's actions if he continues to act as her agent, even though she fired him. In summary, if Patty does not notify third parties that Al is no longer her agent, then Al may continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
However, if Patty properly terminates Al's actual and apparent authority, then Al will no longer be able to act on her behalf, regardless of any remaining implied or incidental authority.
For more question on "Apparent Authority" :
https://brainly.com/question/29893631
#SPJ11
Complete Question
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have __________authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
implied
incidental
actual
apparent
A witness in a court case can never talk about the crime outside the courtroom.
O True
O False
Answers
Answer:
False.
Reason:
it seems to make sense that you can talk about the case out side the court room.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Class or individual Evidence?
Evidence Example: A note was found at a crime scene. A notepad with a similar type of paper was found in the desk of a suspect. Is the note be individual or
class evidence to the pad of paper?
A) class evidence
B) individual evidence
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Individual characteristics can be identified as Individual characteristics can be identified as
having originated with a particular person or having originated with a particular person or
source
hope this helps
Please submit an essay in your own words
regarding at least four vehicular fatalities
due to alcohol involvement.
This essay should be handwritten and at least
four pages long.
Answers
The essay about four vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement is as follows:
Drvnk driving is a serious issue that affects not only the driver but also innocent passengers and other drivers on the road. It is a leading cause of vehicular fatalities and injuries, and it is entirely preventable. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in 2019, 10,142 people died in alcohol-impaired crashes, accounting for 28% of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.
One of the most famous cases of dru.nk driving fatalities is the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, and their driver Henri Paul. In 1997, Henri Paul was driving Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed in Paris when he lost control of the car and crashed into a pillar. The investigation revealed that Paul was under the influence of alcohol and had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) level three times over the legal limit in France. This tragedy serves as a reminder of the dangers of dru.nk driving and the catastrophic consequences it can have.
Another example is the case of Ethan Couch, who was driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs in 2013 when he crashed his truck into a group of pedestrians, killing four people and injuring several others. Couch was only 16 years old at the time and had a BAC level of 0.24%, which is three times over the legal limit for adults in Texas. He was given a controversial sentence of probation and rehabilitation, which sparked outrage and led to the coining of the term "affluenza."
In 2016, former NFL player Will Smith was killed in a shooting that occurred after a road rage incident with another driver in New Orleans. The shooter, Cardell Hayes, was later found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 25 years in prison. The investigation revealed that both Smith and Hayes were under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident. Smith's death serves as a tragic reminder of how alcohol can fuel anger and aggression, leading to deadly consequences.
Lastly, in 2018, a limousine crash in upstate New York killed 20 people, making it the deadliest transportation accident in the US since 2009. The limo driver, who did not have the proper license to operate the vehicle, had a history of drug and alcohol abuse. The investigation revealed that the limo's brakes were not functioning properly, and the driver was unable to stop the vehicle as it went through a stop sign and crashed into a parked car. This tragedy underscores the importance of ensuring that vehicles are in good working condition and that drivers are properly licensed and sober before getting behind the wheel.
In conclusion, dru.nk driving is a serious issue that can have deadly consequences. These examples serve as a reminder of the importance of being responsible and making smart choices when it comes to alcohol and driving. It is vital to never get behind the wheel if you have been drinking, and to make sure that you have a designated driver or alternative transportation if you plan on drinking. By taking these simple steps, we can prevent needless tragedies and keep our roads safe for everyone.
Vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement refer to deaths caused by drivers who operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. When drivers consume alcohol, it impairs their ability to operate a vehicle safely, leading to reckless behavior, poor decision-making, and slower reaction times.
As a result, they may cause accidents that result in the loss of life or serious injuries to themselves and others on the road. Vehicular fatalities due to alcohol involvement are entirely preventable and are a significant public safety concern.
It is crucial to raise awareness about the dangers of DUI driving and promote responsible behaviors to reduce the number of deaths caused by this preventable issue.
Learn more about Driving Under the Influence (DUI): https://brainly.com/question/29771200
#SPJ11
a person who had been convicted of a felony 10 years ago was turned down for license. if he still desired a license, what is his next course of action? select one: a. file a new license application with the georgia real estate commission b. request a hearing before the attorney general c. make a personal appeal to the governor d. request a hearing before the real estate commission
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Request a hearing before the real estate commission
Select the correct answer.
Your friend Keith has been in a dating relationship for six months. His personality has changed in these months. He looks unhappy and rarely
smiles. He avoids the company of friends on the rare occasions you have seen him his face appears bruised. You suspect that Keith may be in
an abusive relationship. What should you do in this case?
ОА
avold talking to Keith
OB confront his dating partner
Ocencourage Keith to speak up and report abuse
OD. advise him to tolerate the abuse, as difficulties are a part of life
Answers
Answer:
Do not avoid talking to him because he may need se serious help. Confronting the partner may rattle them up. Never tolerate something if you're unhappy with it. Encourage Keith to speak up and report the abuse.
Explanation:
There ya go :)
Which of the following is NOT a right that the state has in privately owned property?
Answers
Answer:
Although unpaid taxes result in a lien (which is an encumbrance), an encumbrance is not a state right in and of itself in private property.
Explanation:
IF IT HELPED UH PLEASE MARK ME A BRAINLIEST :))On a city street you should be looking ahead of you as far as
Answers
It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.
What is a city street?These are sub-roads that connect the houses in the inner city to the main road networks.
Hence, while driving, It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.
Read more about city street
brainly.com/question/25404428
#SPJ1
Mayra offers to sell her home to Hanna for "about $100,000 plus closing costs" Hanna accepts Mayra's offer. Later, a dispute arises over the precise dollar amount
Answers
The way a court will resolve this dispute is e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
What makes a binding contract?For a contract to be considered legally binding on the parties, it must comply with the elements of contracts, including:Offer and acceptanceConsiderationMutual intentionLegalityCapacity.What is consideration?
A consideration is a promise of some valuable thing offered by a promissor in exchange for something of value by a promisee.
The rules of consideration ensure that there is a mutual agreement between the promisor and the promisee about its value and also in the eyes of the law.
Thus, in this case, the court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
Learn more about vague considerations in contracts at https://brainly.com/question/17083291
#SPJ1
Question Completion with Answer Options:
Hanna accepts Mayra's offer but later, a dispute arises concerning the precise dollar amount of the purchase price. How will a court resolve this dispute?
a) The court will determine a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.
b) The court will determine that Hanna pays only the figures mentioned in the contract.
c) The court will appoint a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the price to be paid by Hanna.
d) The court will require Hanna to pay the average of her price and Mayra's price.
e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract
Do you think it was important for congress to finish what they started?
Answers
Answer:
it depends
Explanation:
you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.
if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.
Van wants to limit the amount of fat she eats in one meal. Which of these items has about a quarter of the recommended daily value of fat per serving?
correct answer= its B
Answers
The second label has about quarter of recommended daily value of fat per serving.
What is fat?Any ester of fatty acids, or a combination of such compounds, are considered to be fat by accepted criteria in the fields of nutrition, biology, and chemistry. These molecules are most frequently found in food or living things. The word can also refer to any chemical with biological importance that is soluble in non-polar solvents but insoluble in water and is formed of carbon, hydrogen, or oxygen in a broader sense. In this sense, the term would also cover a large variety of other substances, such as mono- and diglycerides, phospholipids, sterols, waxes, and free fatty acids, all of which are often present in human diets at lesser levels. A number of flavouring and fragrance-related compounds as well as non-water-soluble vitamins are also present in dietary lipids.
To learn more about human, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30349401
#SPJ1
T/F Having control over how much money is spent, otherwise known as budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy.
Answers
True, having control over how much money is spent, otherwise known as budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy. This is because the governor can allocate funds to specific programs or agencies, prioritize certain projects, and potentially veto budget items, thereby shaping policy outcomes.
What is budgetary powers?
Budgetary powers refer to the authority and responsibility to create, allocate, and manage financial resources within an organization or government. In the context of government, budgetary powers typically involve the creation and management of the national or local budget, which outlines the expected revenues and expenditures for a given period.
The government's budgetary powers also include the ability to prioritize spending on different areas such as health care, education, defense, infrastructure, etc. This involves making decisions on how much money to allocate to each area, and determining which programs or projects should receive funding.
To know more about Budgetary powers:
https://brainly.com/question/31067316
#SPJ11
True, having control over how much money is spent, or budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy.
Budgetary powers give the governor the authority to allocate funds for various programs and projects within the state, thus shaping policy priorities. By adjusting funding levels, the governor can promote certain initiatives or discourage others, ultimately influencing the direction of state policy.
Additionally, the governor's involvement in the budget process often requires negotiation with state legislators, which further emphasizes the significance of these powers in shaping policy outcomes. Overall, budgetary powers serve as an essential tool for the governor to guide and impact state policy.
To know more about state policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1875331
#SPJ11
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answers
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
Ainsley Jones owes Joseph Hyde $75,000 due on January 1st. On December 5th, Jones offers Hyde her condo in New Hampshire instead of the money owed. Hyde accepts as long as Jones transfers ownership of the condo to Hyde by December 31st. Jones does not transfer the deed to the condo on December 31st. Shortly thereafter Hyde sues for the $75,000 that Jones owed. Jones claims that the contract was discharged by accord and satisfaction. What is the outcome?
Answers
Answer:Hyde having to pay back the money he owes Jones
Explanation:
Plzzz help Match the scenarios with the type of amendment they violate
Answers
Explain: they work like dat
A non-custodial interrogation is not an option after the individual has
the crimes under investigation or asked to speak to an
attorney
Answers
Answer:
when voir dire reveals that a juror is not qualified, able, or fit to serve in a particular case. Lawyers generally have an unlimited number of “for cause” challenges available.
Explanation:
to establish res ipsa loquitur in most states, the plaintiff must demonstrate all but which of the following?
Answers
To establish res ipsa loquitur in most states, the plaintiff must demonstrate all but there is no requirement of direct evidence of the defendant's lack of due care.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine within the Anglo-American not unusual regulation and Roman-Dutch regulation that announces in a tort or civil lawsuit a court docket can infer negligence from the very nature of a coincidence or damage in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved.
Under res ipsa loquitur doctrine, the plaintiff needs to reveal:
The harm more often than not could no longer arise within the absence of negligenceThe plaintiff or any other third party had no position in causing the damageThe defendant had different management of the element that triggered the damage.Various examples of res ipsa loquitur consist of the following: a piano falling from a window and touchdown on a character, a barrel falling from a skyscraper and harming someone below, a sponge left interior a patient following a surgical operation or the carcass of an animal is observed inner a meals can.
Learn more about res ipsa loquitur here brainly.com/question/12177938
#SPJ4
Among adolescents and adults, alcohol use is involved in up to 70% of deaths
associated with water recreation activities.
TRUE
FALSE
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because its logic