Which of the following results of the French and Indian War was a cause of the American Revolutionary War?

Answer:its D

Explanation: the diagram explkains it

Answer:batteries

Explanation:

Answer:

C. Batteries

Explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer: Scribe

Explanation:

Answer:

necause austria was not good to the world

Explanation:

Answer: They didn't get along well and had a horrible relationship

Explanation:

Answer: John Nettleship was a British artist known for his landscape and genre paintings.

Explanation: He was born in 1841 and studied at the Royal Academy Schools in London. Nettleship exhibited his work at the Royal Academy and other major galleries in England, and his paintings are now held in collections around the world.

Roosevelt's radio address is based on an excerpt from the Treaty of Versailles It highlights the importance of countries upholding international law.

On June 28, 1919, the Treaty of Versailles was ratified. The most significant pact of World War I, it put an end to hostilities between Germany and the majority of the Allied Powers.

Exactly five years after the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which started the war, it was signed in the Palace of Versailles. Separate treaties were signed by the other Central Powers on the German side.

The Versailles Treaty was never ratified by the United States, who instead signed a separate peace agreement with Germany. Despite the fact that fighting ended on November 11, 1918, it took the Allies six months of talks at the Paris Peace Conference to reach a peace treaty. Germany was compelled to engage in the negotiations after being forbidden to do so.

Learn more about Treaty of Versailles, from :

brainly.com/question/1800157

#SPJ2

Answer:d

Explanation:

ask your teacher

The tools or constructions is used to inscribe a square inside a circle is an Equilateral triangle. Thus the correct option is B.

An equilateral triangle is one with equal-sized sides on each side and angles that are all up to 60 degrees in length. Here, the three internal angles are all congruent and each measures 60 degrees.

Six equilateral triangles are the necessary tools or constructs to inscribe a hexagon inside of a circle. You can make six triangles if you draw a hexagon inside of a circle and add radii to each of its corners.

The fact that each triangular center of an equilateral triangle is the same as its centroid suggests that the equilateral triangle is the only triangle without an Euler line linking some of the centers.

Therefore, option B is appropriate.

Learn more about the Equilateral triangle, here:

https://brainly.com/question/3485502

#SPJ5

Answer:

They can't work/function on their own and they're short

Explanation:

Answer:

Paine's brilliant arguments were straightforward. He argued for two main points: (1) independence from England and (2) the creation of a democratic republic

Paine's brilliant arguments were straightforward. He argued for two main points: (1) independence from England and (2) the creation of a democratic repulic

1) The key characteristics of fall of the roman empire are :-

•Decline in Morals and Values.

•Public Health.

•Political Corruption.

•Unemployment.

•Inflation.

•Urban decay.

•Inferior Technology.

•Military Spending

2) The Byzantine Empire was the eastern continuation of the Roman Empire after the Western Roman Empire's fall in the fifth century CE. It lasted from the fall of the Roman Empire until the Ottoman conquest in 1453.

3) The fall of Rome also paved the way for another major part of Europe's history: feudalism. ...This eventually developed into the system of feudalism that dominated medieval Europe. Feudalism helped prevent another strong centralized government, like that of Rome, from forming in Europe for hundreds of years.

4)The East–West Schism is the break of communion since the 11th century between the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church. The schism was the culmination of theological and political differences which had developed during the preceding centuries between Eastern and Western Christianity. 

Answer:

•Decline in Morals and Values.

•Public Health.

•Political Corruption.

•Unemployment.

•Inflation.

•Urban decay.

•Inferior Technology.

•Military Spending

Explanation:

Answer:

1- they wanted to try an avoid the controversy of allowing slavery

2- its bc they could no longer have native american slaves

3- He was a Copperhead who opposed the war

Answer: Pompeii is the ideal place to visit to understand how a city of the Roman Empire looked like, whereas Herculaneum is able to show us how people truly lived

Explanation:

Technological advances during the Second Industrial Revolution brought about significant changes in how people lived and worked.

The introduction of electricity, the expansion of railroads, and the development of machinery revolutionized industries and improved transportation and communication.

These advancements led to the rise of factory systems, mass production, and urbanization. People migrated from rural areas to cities in search of employment opportunities in factories.

The use of machinery increased efficiency and productivity, but also led to concerns about labor conditions and job displacement. Overall, the technological advances of the Second Industrial Revolution transformed societies, reshaping work patterns, urban landscapes, and social dynamics.

learn more about second industrial revolution :

https://brainly.com/question/13221792

Answer:

Cabeza de Vaca’s unintentional journey to Texas was a disaster from the start. A series of dire accidents and Indian attacks plagued his expedition’s 300 men as they explored north Florida. The survivors then cobbled together five flimsy boats and headed to sea, where they endured vicious storms, severe shortages of food and water, and attacks from Indians wherever they put to shore.

Explanation:

Answer:

The original governing document of the United States was the Articles of Confederation, adopted by the Continental Congress in 1777 during the Revolutionary War before the United States was officially a country. This structure combined a weak national government with strong state governments. The national government could not tax, could not enforce the laws it passed, and could not regulate commerce. These and other weaknesses, along with an increase in national feeling, led to the Constitutional Convention, which met from May to September 1787.

The U.S. Constitution it produced has been called a "bundle of compromises" because delegates had to give ground on numerous key points to create a Constitution that was acceptable to each of the 13 states. It was ultimately ratified by all 13 in 1789. Here are five key compromises that helped make the U.S. Constitution become a reality.

Answer:

The answer is b because I don't know

PEEL for agreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:

Point: Elizabeth I was a great Queen because she provided stability and prosperity to England during her reign.

Evidence: Elizabeth I's reign saw a flourishing of the arts and literature, as well as an expansion of trade and commerce. She also successfully navigated religious tensions and prevented foreign invasion, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588.

Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies and leadership provided stability and growth to England, which led to an increase in wealth and prestige both domestically and internationally. Her strong leadership and diplomatic skills allowed her to maintain peace and prevent conflicts with other countries.

Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was a great Queen due to her successful reign and contributions to England's prosperity and stability.

PEEL for disagreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:

Point: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen because of her treatment of Catholics and her failure to produce an heir.

Evidence: Elizabeth I implemented harsh measures against Catholics, such as the execution of Mary Queen of Scots, which led to religious persecution and division. Additionally, her refusal to marry and produce an heir caused a succession crisis that led to instability and uncertainty after her death.

Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies towards Catholics and her lack of an heir ultimately had negative consequences for England. Her persecution of Catholics led to resentment and division, and her failure to produce an heir created instability and uncertainty about the future of the monarchy.

Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was not a great Queen due to her policies and decisions that had negative consequences for England's stability and unity.

I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide you with two contrasting opinions on whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen.

Opinion 1: Elizabeth I was a great Queen.

- Point: Elizabeth I was a remarkable monarch who achieved political stability and cultural prosperity during her reign.

- Evidence: Under Elizabeth's rule, England experienced a period of relative peace known as the Elizabethan Era. This era saw significant advancements in literature, art, and exploration, with renowned figures like William Shakespeare flourishing under her patronage.

- Explanation: Elizabeth's astute political decisions, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada and the establishment of the Church of England, contributed to England's rise as a global power. Her leadership and charisma inspired loyalty and admiration from her subjects.

- Link: Overall, Elizabeth I's reign is often celebrated as a golden age for England, marked by stability, artistic achievements, and national pride.

Opinion 2: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen.

- Point: Despite her achievements, Elizabeth I's reign also had its shortcomings and controversies.

- Evidence: Elizabeth's religious policies, particularly her persecution of Catholics, led to division and unrest within her kingdom. Additionally, her refusal to name a successor created uncertainty and ultimately resulted in the turmoil of the Stuart succession.

- Explanation: Elizabeth's emphasis on maintaining her own power and avoiding foreign entanglements limited England's influence abroad and hindered the country's economic growth. Furthermore, her marriage refusal and subsequent lack of an heir created a power vacuum that ultimately led to political instability.

- Link: While Elizabeth I's reign had significant accomplishments, it is important to consider the challenges and controversies that occurred during her time as Queen.

It is important to note that the assessment of whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen can vary depending on the criteria and perspective used.

Answer:

One section stated grievances against England

The author used the ideas of John Locke

Explained Richard Henry Lee's resolution of June 7, 1776

One section stated political principles

Written by Thomas Jefferson

Hope this helps!

Please mark Brainliest! :)

Answer:

i would of read it in a serious type voice

Explanation: because it is one of the deadliest wars in human history, claiming more than 15 million lives. and if they did not follow the map right they would get caught  and die

The tone that will be used to read the given passage will be a serious tone. This tone is used because of the event, about which it is stated in the paragraph.

Each individual has their own way of speaking or writing, especially when used to express an emotion. This way is known as tone. A person's tone gets affected because of many factors, like feelings, mood, situation, and many more.

For instance, he replied in a friendly tone, There was a polite tone to the discussions, and many more. When the tone in writing creates a level of suspense within the reader, that tone is known as the serious tone. The given paragraph is telling about WWI, which is a serious topic.

Therefore, for the paragraph, a serious tone will be used.

Learn more about tone from here:

https://brainly.com/question/1416982

#SPJ2

Answer:

D.) "Leaders should do whatever is necessary to achieve their goals"

Machiavelli's book, "The Prince," is known for its advocacy of using ruthless and sometimes unethical means to maintain power and control. Machiavelli believed that leaders should do whatever it takes to achieve their goals, even if that means using deception, force, or cruelty. He argued that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved, and that a leader must be willing to act quickly and decisively to protect their position of authority. Therefore, the correct answer is d.

Explanation:

The correct statements about Ancient Judea are:

why?

Option A is correct because Ancient Judea came under Roman control in 63 B.C.E. after the Roman general Pompey conquered the region.

Option C is correct because Ancient Judea was located at the crossroads of trade routes connecting the east and west, which made it an important hub for trade and cultural exchange.

Option B is not correct because while Ancient Judea is significant in the biblical narrative and is associated with the land promised to Abraham and his descendants, this statement oversimplifies the complex historical and religious aspects surrounding the land and its ownership.

Option D is not correct because the people of Ancient Judea, particularly the Jewish population, had their own distinct culture and religious practices. They did not embrace Hellenic (Greek) culture to the same extent as other regions under Greek influence. The Jewish people maintained their religious traditions and had conflicts with Hellenistic influence during certain periods.

Answer:

sorry bro

Explanation:

Answer:

they are in order

Explanation:

yay

Verwoerd was an authoritarian, socially conservative leader and an Afrikaner nationalist. He was a member of the Afrikaner Broederbond, an exclusively white and Christian Calvinist secret organization dedicated to advancing the Afrikaner "volk" interests, and like many members of the organization had verbally supported Germany during World War II. Broederbond members like Verwoerd would assume high positions in government upon the Nationalist electoral victory in 1948 and come to wield a profound influence on public and civil society throughout the apartheid era in South Africa.

Verwoerd's desire to ensure white, and especially Afrikaner dominance in South Africa, to the exclusion of the country's nonwhite majority, was a major aspect of his support for a republic (though removing the British monarchy was long a nationalist aspiration anyway). To that same end, Verwoerd greatly expanded apartheid.[citation needed] He branded the system as a policy of "good-neighborliness", stating that different races and cultures could only reach their full potential if they lived and developed apart from each other, avoiding potential cultural clashes,[neutrality is disputed] and that the white minority had to be protected from the majority non-white in South Africa by pursuing a "policy of separate development" namely apartheid and keeping power firmly in the hands of whites.[citation needed] Given Verwoerd's background as a social science academic, he attempted to justify apartheid on ethical and philosophical grounds. This system however saw the complete disfranchisement of the nonwhite population.[2]

Verwoerd heavily repressed opposition to apartheid during his premiership. He ordered the detention and imprisonment of tens of thousands of people and the exile of further thousands, while at the same time greatly empowering, modernizing, and enlarging the white apartheid state's security forces (police and military). He banned black organizations such as the African National Congress and the Pan Africanist Congress, and it was under him that future president Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for life for sabotage.[3][4] Verwoerd's South Africa had one of the highest prison populations in the world and saw a large number of executions and floggings. By the mid-1960s Verwoerd's government to a large degree had put down internal civil resistance to apartheid by employing extraordinary legislative power, draconian laws, psychological intimidation, and the relentless efforts of the white state's security forces.

Apartheid as a program began in 1948 with D. F. Malan's premiership, but it was Verwoerd's large role in its formulation and his efforts to place it on a firmer legal and theoretical footing, including his opposition to even the limited form of integration known as baasskap, that have led him to be dubbed the "Architect of Apartheid". His actions prompted the passing of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761, condemning apartheid, and ultimately leading to South Africa's international isolation and economic sanctions. On 6 September 1966, Verwoerd was stabbed several times by parliamentary aide Dimitri Tsafendas. He died shortly after, and Tsafendas was jailed until his death in 1999.

The prime minister of the Africa gave the speech regarding the education of black Africans, in his speech he told that there should be the equal education between the black Africans and whites.

Hendrik Verwoerd, the Minister of Native Affairs, claimed that the goal was to solve South Africa's “ethnic problems” by creating complementary economic and political units.

It is frequently claimed that the Bantu (African) education policy was intended to direct black or non-white youth to the unskilled labor market.

The African Prime Minister delivered a speech on black African education, in which he stated that black and white Africans should have equal education.

Therefore, there was the starting of equal education among the Americans, black and white man's.

Learn more about the education, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/22517654

#SPJ2