The reason that the media push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading is that:
Some possible reasons include the desire to attract readers or viewers, the desire to influence public opinion, or the desire to advance a particular agenda.Why do media push a non-political narrative?There are a variety of reasons why media organizations might push a non-political narrative that is untrue or misleading.
In some cases, media organizations may be motivated by profit, as sensational headlines or controversial stories can generate more clicks and ad revenue. In other cases, media organizations may be motivated by a desire to shape public opinion or to promote a particular ideology.
Therefore, It is important for readers and viewers to be aware of these potential biases and to critically evaluate the information they consume from the media.
Learn more about media from
https://brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ1
A long-arm statute would be triggered when Multiple Choice Wickham, a resident of Maryland, owns a vacation home in the state of Washington. Bingley, a person who rented Wickham’s vacation home, was injured when a mirror in the home broke. Bingley is suing Wickham in Washington. Darcy, a resident of Kentucky, is suing Elizabeth, a resident of West Virginia, in Kentucky based on an accident in Kentucky in which Darcy is alleging Elizabeth’s negligence. All of the answer choices involve situations where a long-arm statute would be triggered. Georgiana, a resident of Arkansas, is suing Lydia, who has a Nebraska-based business making jewelry. Georgiana purchased the jewelry from Lydia, which caused a severe allergic reaction, while Lydia was selling products from a booth at a street fair in Eureka Springs, Arkansas.
Answer:
Georgiana, a resident of Arkansas, is suing Lydia in Arkansas, who has a Nebraska-based business making jewelry. Georgiana purchased the jewelry from Lydia, which caused a severe allergic reaction, while Lydia was selling products from a booth at a street fair in Eureka Springs, Arkansas.
Explanation:
The situation involving Georgiana and Lydia is one where a long-arm statute would be triggered. A long-arm statute is a law that allows a court to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant who is not physically present within the state's borders, but who has sufficient minimum contacts with the state to justify the court's exercise of jurisdiction. In this case, Lydia is a resident of Nebraska and was selling her products in Arkansas. Georgiana, an Arkansas resident, purchased jewelry from Lydia and suffered a severe allergic reaction as a result. The fact that Lydia conducted business in Arkansas and caused harm to an Arkansas resident would likely be sufficient to trigger a long-arm statute and allow Georgiana to sue Lydia in Arkansas.
The origins of federal jurisdiction law are found in the U.S. Constitution, specifically, the Due Process Clause of the _____ and _______ Amendments. (Choose two correct answers)
The origins of federal jurisdiction law are found in the U.S. Constitution, specifically, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution includes a Due Process Clause that states, "No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This clause ensures that individuals are entitled to certain procedural protections before they can be deprived of their rights or property by the government.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified after the Civil War, contains a Due Process Clause as well. The relevant section of the Fourteenth Amendment states, "No State shall... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This clause extends the protections of due process to actions taken by state governments, ensuring that individuals are afforded fair treatment and procedural safeguards at the state level.
Together, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments establish the foundation for federal jurisdiction law and the application of due process principles in both federal and state courts.The origins of federal jurisdiction law are found in the U.S. Constitution, specifically, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution includes a Due Process Clause that states, "No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This clause ensures that individuals are entitled to certain procedural protections before they can be deprived of their rights or property by the government.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified after the Civil War, contains a Due Process Clause as well. The relevant section of the Fourteenth Amendment states, "No State shall... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This clause extends the protections of due process to actions taken by state governments, ensuring that individuals are afforded fair treatment and procedural safeguards at the state level.
Together, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments establish the foundation for federal jurisdiction law and the application of due process principles in both federal and state courts.
To know more about U.S. Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ11
Who did police originally believe was responsible for the death of Jose and Kitty Menendez?
The police originally suspected that the death of Jose and Kitty Menendez resulted from a mob.
What is a mob?A mob can be described as a criminal gang or simply a Mafia.
By its very nature, a mob is a secret organization made up of criminals.
However, after it was reported that the couple was murdered by their own children, Lyle and Erik Menendez, police arrested the duo and the court proceedings lasted several years before they were convicted and incarcerated for life.
Thus, originally, police believed that a mob was responsible for the death of Jose and Kitty Menendez, not suspecting that the couple's children were the culprits.
Learn more about mobs at https://brainly.com/question/28029513
#SPJ1
jack is on trial for first-degree murder and has pled not guilty. at this stage in the jury trial, the prosecutor is presenting her case against jack by questioning her own witnesses. this questioning is known as .
Jack is on trial for first-degree murder and has pled not guilty. At this stage in the jury trial, the prosecutor is presenting her case against Jack by questioning her own witnesses. This questioning is known as direct examination.
During direct examination, the prosecutor asks questions of her own witnesses to elicit testimony that supports the prosecution's case and proves the elements of the crime charged against the defendant. The defense is given an opportunity to cross-examine each witness after the prosecutor has finished questioning them.
The stage in a jury trial where the prosecutor presents her case against the defendant by questioning her own witnesses is called the "prosecution's case-in-chief." During this stage, the prosecutor presents evidence, such as testimony from witnesses, to support the charges against the defendant. The prosecutor may also introduce physical evidence, such as photographs, documents, or other objects that are relevant to the case.
To know more about direct examination go to
brainly.com/question/4710125
#SPJ4
How did the Anti-Federalists feel about presidential power?
The Anti-Federalists about presidential power tend to oppose the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution which is mainly because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and would threaten individual liberties.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification while believing that the power should thus be concentrated with the states rather than with the federal government. Thus, they tend to worry that a stronger federal government would be prone to tyranny.
However, this happened because these Anti-Federalists believed that this new Constitution did not include adequate protections which would be for the rights of the individuals and the states.
To learn more about the Anti-Federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/29496480
#SPJ4
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
Apol wants to start or join a business but is not sure which organization would be best. She has a large amount of capital but does not yet have any partners who can invest or effectively manage the business
A limited or a general partnership would be best for Apol to start or join a business.
What is partnership ?In a partnership, parties who are referred to as business partners agree to work together to further their shared objectives. Individuals, companies, interest-based organizations, schools, governments, or combinations of these may be the partners in a partnership.
The simplest form of joint ownership for two or more people is a partnership. Limited partners (LP) and limited liability companies are the two most prevalent types of partnerships (LLP).
To learn more about partnership
https://brainly.com/question/19988417
#SPJ1
*Court room*
Me: If you throw sodium chloride at someone’s eyes, is that against the law?
Judge: That would be assault
Me: Yes I know its a salt but is it against the law?
do you agree with me?
play cod with me tonight or your going to court
who is responsible for records management
Answer:
Managers and supervisors
Explanation:
In the administration,the people who are more experienced in data collection and data analysis do these works
what is commercial transaction
You are mailing invitations to new Medicare beneficiaries for a marketing event. You want an idea of how many people to expect, so you would like to request RSVPs. What should you keep in mind?
You may request RSVPs, but you are not permitted to require contact information is what you keep in mind.
What should you keep in mind?Generally, The term "information" is used to refer to anything in the abstract that has the capacity to inform. When broken down to its most elemental components, information refers to the decoding of what may be seen.
The term "RSVP" is an initialism that was taken from the French phrase "Repondez s'il vous plait," which translates as "Respond, if you please" or simply "Please respond." This phrase was originally used to request confirmation of an invitation. The acronym "RSVP" is not used as often as it formerly was in France because many there believe that it is stuffy and out of date.
In conclusion, Keep in mind that while you are allowed to seek RSVPs, you are not able to ask for contact information from those who attend.
Read more about RSVPs
https://brainly.com/question/13988906
#SPJ1
Bentham and Kant agree on?
Answer:
Morality constrains individual self-interest
Explanation:
both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if is one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one shoukd maximise everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
A vehicle that is taller Can become more unstable when cornering because it has a higher center of
Answer:
gravity
Explanation:
The Central Intelligence Agency is responsible for espionage. t/f
Short Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Operation CHAOS or Operation MHCHAOS was a Central Intelligence Agency domestic espionage project targeting the American people from 1967 to 1974, established by President Lyndon B. Johnson and expanded under President Richard Nixon, whose mission was to uncover possible foreign influence on domestic race, anti-war and other protest movements.
Discuss the effect of globalization on women’s private and
political position in the region.
Is the overall impact of globalization positive or negative for
women in the MENA region?
How do civil so
Globalization has had a complex and multifaceted impact on women's private and political position in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.
On the one hand, it has opened up new opportunities for women to engage in global networks and access information, education, and employment. This has allowed many women to challenge traditional gender roles and gain greater autonomy in their private lives. For example, women in the MENA region are now more likely to use the internet and social media to connect with each other, advocate for their rights, and participate in political campaigns.
On the other hand, globalization has also reinforced existing patriarchal structures and power relations, particularly in the political sphere. In many countries in the MENA region, women remain underrepresented in positions of political power and face significant barriers to participation. The economic liberalization that often accompanies globalization has also led to the exploitation of women's labor, particularly in low-wage and informal sectors.
Overall, the impact of globalization on women in the MENA region is mixed. While it has brought new opportunities for empowerment and participation, it has also reinforced gender inequalities and reinforced patriarchal norms. Civil society organizations have played an important role in advocating for women's rights and challenging these inequalities, but they often face significant obstacles, including limited funding and political repression. It is important for policymakers and stakeholders to recognize and address these challenges in order to promote gender equality and women's empowerment in the MENA region.
Learn more about economic :
https://brainly.com/question/30131108
#SPJ11
Difference between negotiation and mediation
Explanation:
In mediation, parties agree to work together, but under the guidance of a trained mediator. ... Through negotiation, parties are able to bind themselves in an agreement. A mediator, on the other hand, doesn't have decision-making power and doesn't hand down a ruling like an arbitrator or a judge might.
What clause requires that states treat people from other states equally to their own residents?
Describe three factors that comtributes to financial crime
Financial Incentives, Weak Regulatory Frameworks and Technological Advancements are three factors that comtributes to financial crime.
Three factors that contribute to financial crime are:
Financial Incentives: The potential for financial gain is a significant motivating factor for individuals or organized groups to engage in financial crimes. This can include activities such as fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or insider trading. The allure of illicit profits, whether through theft, manipulation, or illegal transactions, entices individuals to engage in unlawful activities.
Weak Regulatory Frameworks: Inadequate or weak regulatory frameworks create loopholes and opportunities for financial crime. Insufficient oversight, lax enforcement, and gaps in legislation can enable criminals to exploit vulnerabilities in the financial system. This includes inadequate know-your-customer (KYC) procedures, insufficient monitoring of transactions, and limited regulatory supervision, which can facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit financial activities.
Technological Advancements: While technological advancements have brought numerous benefits to the financial industry, they have also opened new avenues for financial crime. The rapid growth of digital transactions, online banking, and cryptocurrencies has created opportunities for cybercrime, identity theft, and hacking. Criminals leverage technology to carry out sophisticated fraud schemes, phishing attacks, and data breaches, exploiting vulnerabilities in systems and networks.
These factors highlight the importance of robust regulations, effective enforcement mechanisms, and technological safeguards to combat financial crime. It requires a comprehensive approach involving collaboration between financial institutions, law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and international cooperation to mitigate the risks associated with financial crime and protect the integrity of the financial system.
To know more about Financial crime refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/31388410
#SPJ11
Elsa, 26 years of age, was employed as a rigger for Frozen Pty Ltd. While she operated one crane at work, she was struck in the face by a heavy steel chain which slipped out from a machine operated by another crane worker. The blow to her face rendered her unconscious for several minutes. The blow also broke bones in her nose and cheeks. She spent 12 days in hospital, including having cranial surgery to insert plates. From the surgery, she has scarring over her head mostly behind her hairline. She has been left virtually blind in her left eye. She has lost sensation on the left side of her forehead and cheek. She lost her sense of smell and, because of that, most of her sense of taste. She has some degree of memory impairment and some
mood effects. After four months, she had recovered sufficiently to return to her work as a rigger, on light duties. A month later, she was back to working full hours and after another month, she was doing her full pre-injury duties. Nevertheless, she no longer felt comfortable performing those duties and, in any event, was offered new employment in a field she had been pursuing for some years, working as a construction supervisor in a large building company. She took up that employment in November 2015, earning a higher salary than she earned in her previous employment as a rigger. However, Elsa found that although she really enjoyed the new job, her health problems from the original accident at Frozen Pty Ltd worsened while at her new job
which meant that she had to leave. Elsa now wants to sue Frozen Ply Ltd in negligence for injuries sustained from her
original workplace injuries Task: Advise whether Elsa may be successful in a claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence. Discuss the relevance of vicarious liability and any defences which may be raised by Frozen Pty Ltd as part of
your response. Use case references to support your answer.
Elsa may have a viable claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence against Frozen Pty Ltd. The employer has a duty of care towards its employees to provide a safe working environment and take reasonable measures to prevent accidents and injuries.
Vicarious liability may be relevant in this case, as it holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Frozen Pty Ltd may raise defenses to mitigate or avoid liability. One possible defense is contributory negligence, arguing that Elsa's own actions or conduct contributed to the injuries. However, the severity of the injuries and the fact that Elsa was simply performing her job duties as a rigger may weaken this defense.
Case references and further legal analysis would be necessary to fully assess Elsa's chances of success in her claim. Consulting with a legal professional specializing in personal injury law would provide a comprehensive evaluation of the specific circumstances and applicable laws in this jurisdiction to determine the strength of Elsa's case.
Learn more about jurisdiction : brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
On what day does the constitution state that a new president shall be inaugurated? which amendment establishes this? when must the new congress meet?.
On January 20th the constitution states that a new president shall be inaugurated and this was established by the 20th amendment.
The 20th amendment drawn from the Constitution is specifying the particular term of as being each elected President of the United States. It begins at noon time which is on January 20 of every year followed by the election.
Twentieth Amendment is included in Section 2. As per the amendment, the Congress shall assemble or meet at least once each and every year so that such meeting shall be beginning at noon which will be on the third day of January unless they shall be appointed by law on a different day.
2Oth amendment is commonly known as the “Lame Duck Amendment”. The Twentieth Amendment was generally designed to remove the long period of time excessively so that a defeated president or a particular member of Congress would be continuing for the purpose of serving after his or her bid for reelection as it failed.
The Twentieth Amendment is an amendment proposed by U.S. Constitution that is setting the inauguration date for upcoming new presidential terms as well as the date for new congress sessions.
Learn to know more about the constitutional amendment at
https://brainly.com/question/20336789
#SPJ4
The union is looking to gather "authorization cards" and has requested access to you facility to talk with employees.
• What is the issue?
• How would you handle it?
You are in a "Right-to-Work" state. The union wants you to require that anyone who works in this Company be required to join the union.
• What is the issue?
• How would you handle it?
The issue is that the union is seeking authorization cards to gain access to the facility to talk to employees. An authorization card is a signed statement, in writing, that authorizes a labor union to represent the person who signs it.
The union is trying to gain access to a company with the intention of representing its employees.The union requesting access to a company to speak to its employees can lead to some concerns. The company should consider the following before granting access: the impact of unionization on company profits and productivity, the level of support for unionization among workers, and the company’s legal obligations. The company should also create an opportunity to provide employees with comprehensive information regarding unionization.
The issue here is the union's request for mandatory union membership for all employees. The concept of right-to-work is that no one can be forced to join a union. However, in a non-right-to-work state, some employers require workers to join a union as a condition of employment. The company must first determine whether it is a right-to-work state or not.If the company is in a right-to-work state, mandatory union membership is not permitted. The company should inform the union that mandatory union membership is illegal in the state. It is also essential to inform employees that joining the union is voluntary. This approach is likely to discourage union membership, thereby preventing the union from obtaining exclusive bargaining rights with the company.
To know more about Employee union visit-
brainly.com/question/19593231
#SPJ11
In which of the following situations involving oral contracts can the Statute of Frauds be raised?A) if a written confirmation has not been objected by a party in an oral agreementB) if the seller of specially manufactured goods has made a commitment for their procurementC) if the party against whom enforcement of an oral contract is sought has not admitted in pleadings in court of such a contractD) when a contract that requires written confirmation has been agreed orally
A) if a written confirmation has not been objected by a party in an oral agreement
The Statute of Frauds is a legal statute that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable. It can be raised in situations where a contract requires written confirmation and has been agreed orally but not confirmed in writing. Therefore, the correct answer is A) if a written confirmation has not been objected by a party in an oral agreement.
The Statute of Frauds is a legal statute that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable.
learn more about oral agreement here
https://brainly.com/question/29603662
#SPJ4
______ damages are an attempt to put the nonbreaching party in the same position she would have been in if the other party had performed as agreed.
The damages are called "Compensatory damages" that are an attempt to put the non breaching party in the same position she would have been in if the other party had performed as agreed.
What are Compensatory damages?Compensatory damages are the damages awarded by a court to place the claimant in the same position that they would have been in if the breach of contract had never occurred. The goal of these damages is to "compensate" the victim for any damages caused by the breach, such as lost wages, medical expenses, and other economic losses.
Compensatory damages are commonly used in contract law cases, although they may also be awarded in other types of cases, such as personal injury claims. There are two types of compensatory damages, which are "actual damages" and "consequential damages". Actual damages refer to the direct losses that were caused by the breach of contract, such as lost wages or the cost of replacing a damaged item.
Consequential damages refer to indirect losses that were caused by the breach, such as lost profits due to a delay in delivery of goods or services.
To know more about Compensatory damages visit
https://brainly.com/question/32462808
#SPJ11
Article 4 in the Constitution was
written in an attempt to do which of
the following with the government?
A. Get Congress and the president to get along.
B. Get individual states to get along.
C. Get the Supreme Court to align to the Constitution.
D. Get the president to nominate Supreme Court
justices.
Answer:
It should be B. Get individual states to get along.
Explanation:
The article basically outlines the relationship between the states as well as the relationship between the government and individual states.
What do the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court NOT have access to?
A.
the ability to imprison people
B.
the ability to sentence criminals
C.
a police force to conduct arrests
D.
the legal backing of the international community
Answer:
c. a police force to conduct arrests
An LLP can only be created by a professional company - such as a law firm. True False
False. While a limited liability partnership (LLP) is often associated with professional companies such as law firms, it is not limited to them.
A partnership in which some or all members have restricted obligations is known as a limited liability partnership. An LLP is a legal business structure that provides limited liability protection to its owners (partners) similar to a corporation, while also allowing flexibility in terms of management and taxation. LLPs can be formed by professionals in various fields, including accountants, architects, doctors, engineers, and more. So, an LLP can be created by a professional company, but it is not limited to that specific type of business.
To know more about limited liability partnership (LLP)
https://brainly.com/question/32138772
#SPJ11
In, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on
Answer: see below
Explanation:
New Jersey V. T.L.O. 469 U.S. 325 (1985) the scotus ruled that school officials do need a warrant or probable cause to search a student, they only need responsible suspicion
1. John offers Tk. 5,000 to anyone who will remove
rubbish and clean his garden. The following people comply with the terms of
this offer:
(a) His wife, Gen;
(b) His ex-wife, Flora;
(c) His colleague, Sam
(d) His son, 9 years old, William;
(e) His next-door neighbor, Billy-a lunatic.
Advise John whether or not, in these circumstances, any legally
enforceable contracts have been concluded.
Answer:
In these circumstances, it is unlikely that legally enforceable contracts have been concluded with everyone who has complied with John's offer.
(a) John's wife Gen is considered a household member, and thus cannot enter into a contract with her husband.
(b) John's ex-wife Flora, however, can enter into a contract with John.
(c) John's colleague Sam can also enter into a contract with John as they have a professional relationship.
(d) John's son William is a minor, and as per the contract law, a minor cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
(e) John's next-door neighbor Billy is a lunatic, and as per the contract law, a person of unsound mind cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
In conclusion, only John's ex-wife Flora and his colleague Sam have entered into legally enforceable contracts with John for the removal of rubbish and cleaning of his garden.
Which of these descriptions is consistent with the federal system?Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters. A confederal system of government. The colonies had no formal venue for influencing parliamentary policy. Confederal system
The descriptions that is consistent with the federal system A. Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters.
What is the most accurate way to define a federal system?A federal government is a system in which local state governments that are interconnected with the national government and a central national government share power. The national government has power over some aspects of public life, while local governments have control over other aspects.
In federal systems, political power is split between two independent, directly elected sets of governments, one national and the other subnational.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about federal system at:
https://brainly.com/question/695831
#SPJ1
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Answer:
An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.
Explanation:
the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.
have a good day