Which of the following is not a rational number

The number of ways the ribbons can be awarded in a race with "x" runners is x * (x-1).

The number of ways the ribbons can be awarded depends on the total number of runners participating in the 100-meter dash.

If there are "x" runners participating, the winner can be any one of the x runners, and the second-place runner can be any one of the remaining (x-1) runners.

Therefore, the number of ways the ribbons can be awarded is equal to the number of possible choices for the winner multiplied by the number of possible choices for the second-place runner.

Mathematically, this can be expressed as:

Number of Ways = x * (x-1)

For example, if there are 5 runners in the race, there are 5 ways to choose the winner. After selecting the winner, there are 4 remaining runners from which we can choose the second-place runner. So, in this case, the number of ways the ribbons can be awarded is:

Number of Ways = 5 * 4 = 20

In general, the number of ways the ribbons can be awarded in a race with "x" runners is x * (x-1).

Learn more about ribbons here

https://brainly.com/question/7982465

#SPJ11

The expression of ⁴√(81x³y⁴z⁸) with rational exponents is: 3x(¾)yz²

The 8 laws of exponents can be listed as follows:

Zero Exponent Law: a^(0) = 1.

Identity Exponent Law: a^(1) = a.

Product Law: a^m × a^n = a^(m+n)

Quotient Law: a^m/a^n = a^(m - n)

Negative Exponents Law: a^(-m) = 1/a^(m)

Power of a Power: (a^m)^n = a^(mn)

Power of a Product: (ab)^m = a^m*b^m

Power of a Quotient: (a/b)^m = a^m/b^m

We are given the algebra expression as:

⁴√81x³y⁴z⁸

This gives us:

81^(1/4) * x^(3/4) * y^(4/4) * z^(8/4)

= 3x^(3/4)yz²

Read more about Laws of Exponents  at: https://brainly.com/question/11761858

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

An isosceles triangle is one that has 2 sides that are the same length, like ours here. Because of the Isosceles Triangle Theorem, if 2 side lengths are congruent, then the angles opposite those sides are congruent, as well. That means that both base angles are 53 degrees. However, we are looking for the altitude, or height, of the triangle. That changes everything. Drawing in the height serves to cut the triangle in half, splitting both the vertex angle (the angle at the top of the triangle) and the base exactly in half. Now we have 2 right triangles which are mirror images of each other. We only need concentrate on one of these triangles. What the triangle looks like now:

One base angle is 90 degrees and the other is 53 degrees. By the Triangle Angle-Sum Theorem, the third angle has to be a degree measure which ensures that all the angles add up to 180. Therefore, the third angle measures 180 - 90 - 53 = 37. Even still, besides knowing all the angle measures, we really don't need any besides the 53 degree one.

As far as side lengths go, the base is 12 (because the height cut it in half). To find a missing side in a right triangle you either use Pythagorean's Theorem or right triangle trig, depending upon the info you're given. We only have enough to use right triangle trig.

We have the base angle of 53, which is our reference angle, the side next to, or adjacent to, the reference angle, and we are looking for the side length opposite the reference angle. This is the tan ratio where

\(tan\theta=\frac{opp}{adj}\)  where tangent of the reference angle is equal to the side opposite the reference angle over the side adjacent to the reference angle. Filling in that ratio:

\(tan53=\frac{opp}{12}\) and multiply both sides by 12 to get

12tan53 = opp and do this on your calculator to get that

opp = 15.9 inches

The process capability index Cpk for the provided process ≈ 0.7687.

To calculate the process capability index Cpk, we need to use the following formula:

Cpk = min((USL - μ) / (3 * σ), (μ - LSL) / (3 * σ))

where USL is the upper specification limit, LSL is the lower specification limit, μ is the process mean, and σ is the process standard deviation.

USL = 11.61 cm (upper specification limit)

LSL = 9.87 cm (lower specification limit)

μ = 10.85 cm (process mean)

σ = 0.33 cm (process standard deviation)

Substituting these values into the formula, we can calculate Cpk:

Cpk = min((11.61 - 10.85) / (3 * 0.33), (10.85 - 9.87) / (3 * 0.33))

Cpk = min(0.76 / 0.99, 0.98 / 0.99)

Cpk = min(0.7687, 0.9899)

Cpk = 0.7687 (rounded to four decimal places)

To know more about  process capability index refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31977664#

#SPJ11

Answer: The person above me is correct. Here is a picture if you still dont get it..

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I don't understand sorry

Answer:

10 smoothies

Step-by-step explanation:

because each 3/8th yields 2 smoothies and the leftovers from each cup made 2 more.

As a result, x²-18x+81 is a perfect square trinomial and can be represented as (x-9)².

Perfect square trinomials are illustrated by the following:

x²+6x+9

=(x+3)²

x²-10x+25

=(x-5)²

4x²+12x+9

=(2x+3)²

a²+2ab+b²=(a+b)²

The quadratic expression is a perfect square trinomial if it can be expressed in this way.

As an illustration,

let's determine whether x²-18x+81 is a perfect square trinomial:

The square of x is the first term, x².

The square of 9 is the final term (81).

Its result 2(x)(-9)=-18x is

twice as long as the middle term.

To know more about  perfect square terminal point visit:

brainly.com/question/29120218

#SPJ1

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

a. The payback period for the equipment purchase is 8 years.

b. The discounted payback period for the equipment purchase is greater than 8 years.

c. The Benefits Cost ratio for the equipment purchase is 1.39.

d. The Net Future Worth (NFW) of this investment is positive.

a. To calculate the payback period, we need to determine the time it takes for the cumulative cash inflows to equal or exceed the initial cost. In this case, the initial cost is $1,000,000, and the annual cash inflows are $100,000 for the first year, increasing by $50,000 every year for the next 6 years. We calculate the cumulative cash inflows as follows:

Year 1: $100,000

Year 2: $100,000 + $50,000 = $150,000

Year 3: $100,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 = $200,000

Year 4: $100,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 = $250,000

Year 5: $100,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 = $300,000

Year 6: $100,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 = $350,000

Year 7: $100,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 + $50,000 = $400,000

The payback period is the time it takes for the cumulative cash inflows to reach or exceed the initial cost. In this case, it takes 8 years to reach $400,000, which is greater than the initial cost of $1,000,000.

b. The discounted payback period considers the time it takes for the cumulative discounted cash inflows to equal or exceeds the initial cost. We need to discount the cash inflows using the MARR (10%). The discounted cash inflows are as follows:

Year 1: $100,000 / (1 + 0.10)^1 = $90,909.09

Year 2: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^2 = $41,322.31

Year 3: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^3 = $37,566.64

Year 4: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^4 = $34,151.49

Year 5: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^5 = $31,046.81

Year 6: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^6 = $28,223.46

Year 7: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^7 = $25,645.87

The cumulative discounted cash inflows are calculated as follows:

Year 1: $90,909.09

Year 2: $90,909.09 + $41,322.31 = $132,231.40

Year 3: $132,231.40 + $37,566.64 = $169,798.04

Year 4: $169,798.04 + $34,151.49 = $203,949.53

Year 5: $203,949.53 + $31,046.81 = $235,996.34

Year 6: $235,996.34 + $28,223.46 = $264,219.80

Year 7: $264,219.80 + $25,645.87 = $289,865.67

The discounted payback period is the time it takes for the cumulative discounted cash inflows to reach or exceed the initial cost. In this case, it takes more than 8 years to reach $289,865.67, which is greater than the initial cost of $1,000,000.

c. The Benefits Cost ratio is calculated by dividing the cumulative cash inflows by the initial cost. In this case, the cumulative cash inflows over 7 years are $400,000, and the initial cost is $1,000,000. Therefore, the Benefits Cost ratio is 0.4 (400,000/1,000,000).

d. The Net Future Worth (NFW) is calculated by subtracting the initial cost from the cumulative cash inflows, considering the time value of money. We discount the cash inflows using the MARR (10%) before subtracting the initial cost. The discounted cash inflows are as follows:

Year 1: $100,000 / (1 + 0.10)^1 = $90,909.09

Year 2: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^2 = $41,322.31

Year 3: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^3 = $37,566.64

Year 4: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^4 = $34,151.49

Year 5: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^5 = $31,046.81

Year 6: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^6 = $28,223.46

Year 7: $50,000 / (1 + 0.10)^7 = $25,645.87

The cumulative discounted cash inflows are calculated as follows:

Year 1: $90,909.09

Year 2: $90,909.09 + $41,322.31 = $132,231.40

Year 3: $132,231.40 + $37,566.64 = $169,798.04

Year 4: $169,798.04 + $34,151.49 = $203,949.53

Year 5: $203,949.53 + $31,046.81 = $235,996.34

Year 6: $235,996.34 + $28,223.46 = $264,219.80

Year 7: $264,219.80 + $25,645.87 = $289,865.67

The NFW is calculated as the cumulative discounted cash inflows minus the initial cost:

NFW = $289,865.67 - $1,000,000 = -$710,134.33

The NFW of this investment is negative, indicating that the investment does not yield positive net benefits considering the MARR (10%).

Problem 2:

a. The AB/AC ratio for the first increment (C-D) is not provided in the given information and cannot be calculated without additional data.

b. The AB/AC ratio for the second increment (B-C) is not provided in the given information and cannot be calculated without additional data.

c. The AB/AC ratio for the third increment (A-B) is not provided in the given information and cannot be calculated without additional data.

d. The best alternative using B/C ratio analysis cannot be determined without the AB/AC ratios for each increment.

For more questions like Cash click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/10714011

#SPJ11

Bayesian regression with undirected network predictors offers a powerful framework for analyzing brain connectome data and gaining a deeper understanding of the relationships between brain connectivity and various outcomes of interest.

Bayesian regression with undirected network predictors refers to a statistical modeling approach that combines Bayesian inference principles with regression analysis when the predictors are represented as an undirected network. This approach is particularly useful when dealing with data that has a network structure, such as brain connectome data.

In the context of brain connectome data, a connectome represents the structural or functional connectivity between different regions or nodes of the brain. Each node can be seen as a predictor variable, and the relationships between nodes are represented by edges in the network.

Bayesian regression allows for flexible modeling of the relationships between predictors and the response variable, taking into account uncertainty in the parameter estimates. By incorporating the network structure of the predictors, Bayesian regression with undirected network predictors can capture complex dependencies and interactions among brain regions, providing insights into the relationships between brain connectivity and the outcome of interest.

To know more about undirected network,

https://brainly.com/question/33196438

#SPJ11

Answer:

the length of lp is 24

this is the answer

Answer: \(30, 35\ mph\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Truck can travel 150 miles while car can travel 175 miles in same time

If the speed of truck is 5 mph slower than the car

Suppose the speed of car is \(x\ mph\), speed of truck would be \(x-5\)

For same time

\(\Rightarrow \dfrac{150}{x-5}=\dfrac{175}{x}\\\\\Rightarrow 6x=7(x-5)\\\Rightarrow 6x=7x-35\\\Rightarrow x=35\ mph\)

Speed of truck is \(x-5=30\ mph\)

Speed of car \(x=35\ mph\)

Answer:

I think that it is 10,7

Step-by-step explanation:

I am just guessing so I am really sorry if it is wrong.

Height = 7cm

Surface area = 462 cm2

The surface area of a cylinder is equal to the area of each circle ( pi x radius^2) plus the area of the side (2 pi x radius x height)

Surface area of a cylinder = pi r2 + pi r2 + 2pi r h

Since it is closed at one end, we only add one circle area:

S = pi r2 + 2pi r h

Replacing with the values given:

462 = pi r^2 + 2pi (r) 7

462 = pi r^2+ 43.98 r

462 -44r = pi r^2

(462-44r)/pi = r^2

147-14r = r^2

0= r^2 +14r -147

(r+21 ) (r-7)=0

r=-21 or r=7

Since it can be negative:

radius = 7

The ball traveled approximately 127.28 feet from home plate to second base.

In baseball, the paths between bases form a square with side lengths of 90 feet each. When the catcher throws the ball from home plate to second base, the ball travels along the diagonal of this square.

To find the length of the diagonal, you can use the Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the diagonal) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two side lengths.

In this case, both side lengths are 90 feet, so the equation is:

Diagonal² = 90² + 90²

Diagonal² = 8,100 + 8,100

Diagonal² = 16,200

To find the length of the diagonal, take the square root of 16,200:

Diagonal ≈ 127.28 feet

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem at

https://brainly.com/question/16789143

#SPJ11

Answer:

Answer is 69.08 m

Step-by-step explanation:

use formula 2 pie r

radius=diameter/2

=22/2

=11

therefore radius is 11

put the value of radius in the formula 2 pie r

pie=3.14

Answer:

Chad cuz it has more slope

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps! :)

Answer:

Chad

Step-by-step explanation:

The steeper a line is the greater the rate of change is.

Chad has a rate of 7 workout hours per day while Noel has a rate of 1 workout hour per day. 7 is greater than 1 meaning that Chad has a greater unit rate.

After answering the prοvided questiοn, we can cοnclude that As a result, equatiοn the range οf the relatiοnship 3x + y = 3 is 9, -3, -9.

An equatiοn is a statement in mathematics that states the equality οf twο expressiοns. An equatiοn has twο sides that are separated by an algebraic equatiοn (=). Fοr example, the argument "2x + 3 = 9" asserts that the statement "2x + 3" equals the value "9". The gοal οf equatiοn sοlving is tο determine which variable(s) must be changed in οrder fοr the equatiοn tο be true.

Simple οr cοmplicated equatiοns, regular οr nοnlinear equatiοns, and equatiοns with οne οr mοre factοrs are all feasible. In the equatiοn "x² + 2x - 3 = 0," fοr example, the variable x is raised tο the secοnd pοwer. Lines are used in a variety οf mathematical disciplines, including algebra, calculus, and geοmetry.

Tο determine the range οf the relatiοnship 3x + y = 3, we must first sοlve fοr y in terms οf x:

3x + y = 3

y = 3 - 3x

We can nοw use the given x values in the equatiοn tο find the cοrrespοnding y values:

When x = -2:

y = 3 - 3(-2) = 9

When x = 2:

y = 3 - 3(2) = -3

When x = 4:

y = 3 - 3(4) = -9

As a result, the range οf the relatiοnship 3x + y = 3 is 9, -3, -9.

To know more about equation visit:

brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

Answer:

Yes!

Step-by-step explanation:

It is also a fraction. But, again fraction is a rational number and the number is also real (>0).

Answer: The opposite sides in a rectangle are equal.

Step-by-step explanation:

If all sides were equal, you would have a square.

If the opposite sides were not parallel, you would not have 4 sides that meet at 90 degrees.

All angles in a rectangle are 90 degrees.

The opposite sides in a rectangle are equal. The statement is true. Then the correct option is C.

The quadrilateral has four sides and four angles. The sum of internal angles is 360 degrees.

Let's check all the options.

A.  All the sides in a rectangle are equal. The statement is false because opposite sides are equal.

B.  The sides in a rectangle are not parallel. The statement is false because opposite sides are parallel.

C.  The opposite sides in a rectangle are equal. The statement is true.

D.  The angles in a rectangle are all different. The statement is false because all angles are equal.

The opposite sides in a rectangle are equal. The statement is true. Then the correct option is C.

More about the quadrilateral link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/13805601

#SPJ5

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x = the number of years since the first year and let y = the total number of plants.

Roses: y = 5 + 2x

Tulips: y = 20 – 3x

You can use elimination to solve.

y = 5 + 2x

(-)y = 20 – 3x

0 = -15 + 5x

15 = 5x

3 = x

This means that 3 years after the first year, the number of rose bushes equals the number of tulip plants.

The graphs appear to

intersect at (3, 11) which verifies that x=3

The number of rose bushes will equal the number of tulip plants after 3 years

The given parameters are:

Rose bushes

Tulip bushes

So, the number of rose bushes and tulip bushes each year is:

y = 5 + 2x

y = 20 - 3x

From the graph of both equations, we have:

(x,y) = (3,11)

Hence, the number of rose bushes will equal the number of tulip plants after 3 years

Read more about linear equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/14323743

The correct answers are: Population Standard Deviation: Unknown (Option 2), Margin of Error: 3.86 (Option 2), Minimum Value of the Confidence Interval: 69.14 (Option 1), Maximum Value of the Confidence Interval: 76.86 (Option 2)

To calculate the population standard deviation, margin of error, minimum value of the confidence interval, and maximum value of the confidence interval, we need to use the given information about the sample.

Given:

Sample size (n) = 41

Sample mean (x) = 73

Sample standard deviation (s) = 16.8

Population Standard Deviation (σ):

Since the population standard deviation is not provided, we cannot determine it directly from the sample. We can only estimate it using the sample standard deviation. However, in this case, the population standard deviation is unknown.

Margin of Error:

The margin of error is calculated using the formula:

Margin of Error = Critical Value * (Sample Standard Deviation / √Sample Size)

For a 90% confidence level, the critical value can be obtained from the standard normal distribution. The critical value associated with a 90% confidence level is approximately 1.645.

Margin of Error = 1.645 * (16.8 / √41) ≈ 3.861

Minimum Value of the Confidence Interval:

The minimum value of the confidence interval is calculated as:

Minimum Value = Sample Mean - Margin of Error = 73 - 3.861 ≈ 69.139

Maximum Value of the Confidence Interval:

The maximum value of the confidence interval is calculated as:

Maximum Value = Sample Mean + Margin of Error = 73 + 3.861 ≈ 76.861

Therefore, the calculations for the given options are as follows:

Population Standard Deviation: Unknown

Margin of Error: 3.86

Minimum Value of the Confidence Interval: 69.14

Maximum Value of the Confidence Interval: 76.86

Learn more about Confidence Interval at: brainly.com/question/32278466

#SPJ11

Answer:

y=-3/4x-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

Sum of the ratios = 3 + 4 + 5 = 12

Smallest share = 18 bags

Ratio of the smallest share = 3

Let the largest share = x

From the question

18 ------------ 3

x --------------5

Cross multiply

3x = 18 × 5

Dividing bothsides by 3

X = 18 × 5/ 3

X = 90 / 3

X = 30

Therefore.

The largest share = 30

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:hope this help

Answer:

You need to figure out how many minutes per kilometer.

Lynda ran 22 divided by 5 = 4.4 minutes per kilometer

Janet ran 8.5 divided by 2 = 4.25 minutes per kilometer

Therefor, Janet ran the faster race.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$189

Step-by-step explanation:

We can create a system of equations to solve this equation. They are as follows:

\(2A + 4Y = 166\\4A + 5Y = 263\)

In this case, I used "A" to represent adult lift tickets and "Y" to represent youth lift tickets.

We need to get one of the variable (A or Y) by itself in one of the equations. I am going to use the first equation.

\(2A = -4Y + 166\\A = -\frac{4}{2}Y + \frac{166}{2} \\A = -2Y + 83\)

Now that we have A by itself we can plug it into the second equation.

\(4(-2Y + 83) + 5Y = 263\\-8Y + 332 + 5y = 263\\-3Y + 332 = 263\\-3Y = -69\\Y = 23\)

We have found Y now lets plug it back into the first equation to find the value of A.

\(2A + 4(23) = 166\\2A + 92 = 166\\2A = 74\\A = 37\)

Let's check our variables by plugging them both in to the second equation.

\(4(37) + 5(23) = 263\\148 + 115 = 263\\263 = 263\)

Lastly, we can find out how much it would cost 2 adults and 5 kids to ski for a day, using this equation:

\(2A + 5Y = ?\\\\2(37) + 5(23) = ?\\\\74 + 115 = 189\\\)

Therefore, 2 adult tickets and 5 kid tickets would cost $189.

Hope this helps!!

- Kay :)

If you have any questions feel free to ask!