Answers
Which of the following is an assumption of pluralism?
A. Only wealthy interests have influence over government decisions.
B. Government decisions reflect the preferences of elites.
C. Interest groups are integral to government decisions.
D. Policy makers care more about public opinion than interest groups' preferences.
E. Political parties matter more than interest groups in shaping government policies.
The correct answer is option C, the correct assumption of pluralism is Government choices are heavily influenced by interest groups.
The idea that political and decision-making processes take place inside the framework of the government but that non-governmental organizations can still have an impact is known as classical pluralism. The distribution of influence and authority within the political system is the key issue for traditional pluralism.
According to pluralism, disputes frequently arise when different groups of people attempt to maximize their own interests, and the shifting of power is effective in negotiating power between different interest groups.
According to pluralists, there would still be inequities, but these would be leveled by the allocation of resources among a population. They favor an electoral system with a minimum of two parties, as well as freedom of association and religion.
To learn more about pluralism please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14929497
#SPJ4
Related Questions
In the case of Fletcher v. Peck (1810), Georgia sold large tracts of land to speculators in 1795. A few years later, the Georgia legislature voided the sale in response to public outcry that the original agreement was conducted with bribes. In the intervening period, Robert Fletcher, a land speculator, had purchased a tract of land from John Peck, who had acquired the land from the original agreement in 1795. Fletcher took Peck to court, arguing that he had no right to sell the land and that the sale was a breach of contract. The Court's decision favored Peck based on the argument that bills of attainder and ex post facto laws are unconstitutional. Why is the Supreme Court's decision in the scenario one that reflects judicial restraint
Answers
Answer:
Because the court did not review the events and laws that govern the process.
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, Fletcher bought land from Peck before legislation that prohibited the sale of land to speculators was enforced. This means that he made this purchase when this practice was still legal, although there was a clamor for this activity to end. However, Fletcher decided to go to the federal supreme court stating that the purchase was illegal. However, the Court stated that this case was an ex post facto law, which they considered invalid, unconstitutional. This is a type of law with retroactive effects, where its effects work on the facts that happened before its ratification. Thus, the court refused to make a judicial review of these facts, promoting an example of judicial restraint.
differentiate between duress and undue influence with examples
Answers
Answer:
An example of duress would be physical abuse by the abuser, ex., hitting the victim until they gave the abuser valuable jewelry. Proving undue influence is more complicated. An example of undue influence would be for an abusive spouse to withhold affection, unless the abusive spouse were given valuable jewelry.
Miranda rights must be advised only when a person is in custody.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations, which means the police don't have to give Miranda warnings every time they question or talk to someone. Miranda rights come into play when the police arrest or detain someone. Detention here means that the person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave.
Nick is writing an article for his school’s website about the increasing interest in school plays. Which of the following elements would help readers visually understand the rise in the number of students who have participated in the school's plays in the last five years?
A.
formatting: headings to separate parts of the article
B.
multimedia: video clip of student actors rehearsing
C.
graphics: graph showing student involvement in the plays
D.
graphics: table listing the plays from the last five years
i give brainlest answer rigth fro brainlest
Answers
Answer:
C.) Graphics: graph showing students involvement in the plays.
Dana was a highly conscientious environmental health and safety manager at Fiberoptics Corporation. One day a janitorial employee reported to Dana that he found a brown paper bag in a corner of the men’s changing room inside the plant. Dana went to the changing room and confirmed the presence of the bag. She called the local fire department, which sent a first-responder unit to the plant. The plant was shut down and evacuated, while the first responders examined the mysterious parcel. It turned out to contain a bagel with cream cheese and a latte. The company lost more than $10,000 due to lost employee time and lost production, and the fire company sent the firm a bill for $2,000. The CEO told Dana, "I know you meant well, but you clearly overreacted. I’m not firing you, but I am demoting you to a position in the HR department. You’ll keep your salary."
Is Dana the victim of a retaliatory demotion? If so, what are her damages?
Answers
No, Dana is not the victim of a retaliatory demotion.
Retaliation occurs when an employer takes an adverse employment action against an employee for engaging in protected activity, such as reporting discrimination or whistleblowing.
In this case, Dana did not engage in any protected activity, she simply responded to a report of a suspicious package in the workplace. While the CEO may have disagreed with her decision to call the fire department and evacuate the plant, this is not a form of retaliation.
As Dana is not the victim of a retaliatory demotion, she does not have any damages. She was not fired or demoted because of any protected activity, and she was able to keep her salary. While she may be unhappy with her new position in the HR department, this is not a legal issue and does not entitle her to any damages.
For more similar questions on retaliatory:
brainly.com/question/14591700
#SPJ11
"An appearance before a magistrate during which the legality of the defendant's arrest is initially assessed and the defendant is informed of the charges on which he or she is being held. Bail may be set or pretrial released arranged
First Appearance
Preliminary Hearing
Pretrail Release"
Answers
The legal process described is commonly known as the "First Appearance," where a defendant appears before a magistrate to assess the legality of their arrest, inform them of the charges, and determine bail or arrange for pretrial release.
The First Appearance is an important step in the criminal justice system that occurs shortly after a defendant's arrest. During this appearance before a magistrate, the legality of the defendant's arrest is initially assessed to ensure their rights were upheld. The magistrate also informs the defendant of the charges they are facing, providing them with essential information about the case. Additionally, the magistrate has the authority to set bail, which is a monetary amount that can secure the defendant's release from custody pending trial. Alternatively, the magistrate may arrange for pretrial release, which could involve conditions like regular check-ins, electronic monitoring, or house arrest. The specific procedures and criteria for First Appearances, as well as the determination of bail or pretrial release, can vary depending on jurisdiction and the nature of the case.
Learn more about criminal justice system here: brainly.com/question/28913925
#SPJ11
Question 9 of 10 Which of the following is a function of accounts receivable? O A. Locating discounts and incentives O B. Monitoring outstanding invoices O C. Communicating with investors and banks D. Paying vendors for services rendered
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Monitoring outstanding invoices
2. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act
Group of answer choices
prohibited securities firms from purchasing banks
prohibited banks from engaging in real estate activities
prohibited insurance companies from purchasing banks
allowed banks to underwrite insurance and securities
3.
The modern commercial banking industry in the United States began
Group of answer choices
when the Bank of North America was chartered
with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913
with the National Bank Act of 1863
when the Bank of the United States was chartered
4.
Commercial bank regulation in the United States is performed by
Group of answer choices
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency only
multiple regulatory agencies with overlapping jurisdictions
a centralized independent regulator agency
a centralized government regulatory agency
5.
In the United States, financial derivatives were first issued in
Group of answer choices
1999
1975
2000
1982
6.The originate-to-distribute banking model
Group of answer choices
made the financial system more stable
generated more fee income for lending bankscompared to the traditional banking model
generated more interest income for lending banks compared to the traditional banking model
increased lending bank reliance on long-term profits
Answers
2. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act allowed banks to underwrite insurance and securities.
3. The modern commercial banking industry in the United States began with the National Bank Act of 1863.
4. Commercial bank regulation in the United States is performed by multiple regulatory agencies with overlapping jurisdictions.
5. Financial derivatives were first issued in the United States in 1975.
6. The originate-to-distribute banking model had mixed effects on the financial system. It generated more fee income for lending banks compared to the traditional banking model, but its impact on stability and interest income was less clear.
2. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, signed into law in 1999, repealed the provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act that had previously separated commercial banking, investment banking, and insurance activities. This allowed banks to engage in underwriting and dealing in securities, as well as conducting insurance activities. The act aimed to promote competition and innovation in the financial sector by removing restrictions on the types of services that financial institutions could provide.
3. The National Bank Act of 1863 laid the foundation for the modern commercial banking industry in the United States. It established a system of federally chartered banks and introduced regulations, such as capital requirements and bank supervision, to ensure the stability and integrity of the banking sector. The act also created a national currency, promoting a more uniform and reliable monetary system.
4. Commercial bank regulation in the United States involves multiple regulatory agencies with overlapping jurisdictions. The primary regulatory agencies responsible for overseeing and regulating commercial banks are the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Reserve System (Fed), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Each agency has specific responsibilities and powers related to the supervision, examination, and enforcement of regulations governing commercial banks.
5. The correct answer is 1975. The introduction of financial derivatives in the United States can be attributed to the creation of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) in 1973. The CBOE launched trading in options contracts on individual stocks on April 26, 1973, which marked the beginning of a new era for financial derivatives.
This development revolutionized the financial markets by providing investors with the ability to trade options, which are a type of derivative contract. The introduction of financial derivatives brought increased liquidity, risk management tools, and opportunities for hedging strategies in the U.S. financial landscape.
6. The originate-to-distribute banking model refers to the practice of originating loans and then selling them off to investors through securitization. This model did generate more fee income for lending banks as they earned fees from originating and packaging loans. However, its impact on the stability of the financial system is debatable. The securitization process led to the dispersion of risk across various investors, potentially reducing the concentration of risk in individual banks.
To know more about insurance here https://brainly.com/question/30291521
#SPJ4
Which statement alligns with the supreme court’s ruling in brown vs board of education
Answers
Answer:
Separate treatment based on race is inherently unequal.
Explanation:
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
Answers
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
what types of jobs are there in a command economy
Answers
Answer:
All major industries in a command economy are government-run monopolies. This includes utility companies, banks, and factories producing everything from clothing to cars.
. which is more difficult for law enforcement communication written or spoken communication?
Answers
Determining whether written or spoken communication is more difficult for law enforcement can depend on various factors and contexts. Both forms of communication have their own challenges.
Written communication in law enforcement requires clarity and accuracy to ensure legal documentation and reports are precise and understandable. Law enforcement officers must possess strong writing skills to effectively convey information, maintain records, and prepare court documents. Challenges may arise when officers struggle with writing skills or face time constraints that impact the quality and thoroughness of their written communication.
On the other hand, spoken communication in law enforcement presents challenges such as rapid decision-making, dealing with high-stress situations, and effective verbal de-escalation.
Learn more about spoken communication
https://brainly.com/question/30157223
#SPJ11
An item that is releasing a mix of particulates and aerosols as well as gases is referred to as:
Answers
Answer:
Off-Aggregating
Explanation:
1. Highlight the pertinent facts:
2. Identify the issue of law posed by the case problem. This will be in the form of a question based on a legal concept from the chapter.
3. What should be the decision in the case? (i.e. the answer to the issue).
4. The reasoning for such decision.
3. Defendant drove a vehicle with two companions. They stopped at a house. The two companions got out of the vehicle. Defendant drove away with the understanding he was to return in fifteen minutes for the other two men. The two men used a screwdriver to open the front door. They removed various items. Defendant returned after fifteen minutes and picked up the two men and the property that had been removed from the house. Defendant later received his one third share of the proceeds from the sale of the removed goods. He argues that he was unaware that his companions were doing anything against the law. What crime, if any, should defendant be charged with? Explain.
Answers
The issue of law in the given case is whether the defendant can be charged with a crime based on his involvement in the burglary committed by his two companions. The key question is whether the defendant's knowledge or awareness of his companions' criminal actions is necessary for his criminal liability. The decision in this case would likely be that the defendant can be charged with a crime, specifically the crime of burglary, despite his claim of unawareness. The reasoning for this decision would be that the defendant's active participation in the burglary, his intent to commit the crime, and his subsequent benefit from the proceeds establish his criminal liability.
In this case, the defendant drove a vehicle with two companions who later burglarized a house. The defendant left the scene but returned after fifteen minutes to pick up his companions and the stolen property. The defendant argues that he was unaware of his companions' illegal activities and, therefore, should not be charged with a crime.
However, the decision in this case would likely be that the defendant can be charged with a crime, specifically the crime of burglary. The reasoning for this decision lies in the principles of accomplice liability and the doctrine of transferred intent. Despite the defendant's claim of unawareness, his active participation in the burglary by driving the vehicle, his intent to return to pick up his companions and the stolen property, and his subsequent receipt of a share of the proceeds from the sale of the stolen goods establish his criminal liability.
Under accomplice liability, individuals who aid, abet, or assist in the commission of a crime can be held equally responsible as the principal offenders. In this case, the defendant actively participated in the burglary by providing transportation and facilitating the commission of the crime. Furthermore, the doctrine of transferred intent applies when a person intends to commit one crime but ends up committing a different crime. Although the defendant may claim unawareness of the burglary, his intent to facilitate the actions of his companions and his subsequent benefit from the proceeds can establish his intent to participate in the criminal act.
Therefore, based on the defendant's active participation, intent, and benefit from the proceeds, he can be charged with the crime of burglary, regardless of his claim of unawareness of his companions' actions.
Learn more about Burglary
https://brainly.com/question/30777991
#SPJ11
Why are courts more trustworthy than elected officials ?
Answers
Answer:
Basically, courts don't really take advantage of you and actually follow the rules/ laws, meanwhile, elected officials really don't
Explanation:
whats the reason of traffica laws
Answers
Answer:
The reason of traffic laws is to protect you and other people in the streets and to have a proper line of vehicles in the road to avoid accidents.
Are there any circumstances under which
reporters should be required to reveal or protect their
confidential information or sources?
Answers
Answer:Do reporters have to reveal their sources?
State constitutions and common law. ... Roughly 30 states have passed statutes, called shield laws, allowing journalists to refuse to disclose or testify about confidential or unpublished information, including the identity of sources. The statutes vary significantly from state to state in the scope of their protections.
Explanation:hope this helps
In most cases, the law requires that you have an emission test every two years at the time of registration or at time of sale.
Answers
True
What is emission test?
Some states demand emissions tests based on the brand, model, or year of your car, depending on where you live. When doing the test, auto technicians typically consider your car's carbon footprint as well as other mechanical elements that have an impact on air quality or generate excessive pollution.
Review these suggestions before submitting your automobile for an emissions test to learn more about the procedure and how to make sure your car passes the first time.
Learn more about emission test with the help of given link:-
https://brainly.com/question/9087591
#SPJ4
The bomb has been planted
Answers
Some states hold a(n)_____ in which a group of people get together and discuss who they would like to choose to represent their political party before they vote.
Caucus
O Winner-Takes- All O
Incumbent
General Election
Answers
Answer:
general election ..............
Defendant is accused of the wrong doing?
Answers
You overhear your friend complaining that he's upset there's no way to change the constitution
Answers
Go live in L'Manburg.
Question 2
Ballistics The science that deals with the motion, behavior and effects of projectiles such as bullets.
a.Yes
b.Νο
Answers
Do you think this decision precludes a lottery group from being
a partnership? How could the parties have prevented this
dispute?
Answers
Yes, this decision precludes a lottery group from being a partnership.
This decision precludes a lottery group from being a partnership because a partnership is a type of business structure in which two or more people own a business together and share profits and losses, while a lottery group is simply a group of individuals who pool their money together to purchase lottery tickets in hopes of winning.The parties could have prevented this dispute by creating a formal partnership agreement that outlined the terms of the partnership, including how profits and losses would be divided, how decisions would be made, and what would happen if the partnership dissolved. The agreement could also have addressed what would happen if one party contributed more money to the group than the others or if one party claimed a larger share of the winnings. This would have provided clear guidelines for the group and could have prevented any misunderstandings or disputes.
To know more about agreement visit:
brainly.com/question/32579265
#SPJ11
Greg Deveroux just turned eighteen years old, and on a dare from friends he foolishly entered the arcade on the city’s boardwalk after it had closed for the evening. He has never been in trouble with the police before and did not steal anything in the arcade, although he did trip over some boxes in the storeroom. The noise alerted the night watchman, who subsequently turned Greg over to police, and he was arrested for breaking and entering. Today he stands before the judge at his arraignment to determine if he will be released from jail until his trial begins in three months. What is the most likely outcome of Greg’s request to be released from jail? Responses
Answers
Greg won't need to post bail or hand over any property deeds to ensure his attendance; he will be freed on his own recognizance.
What does Gentle Is the Night mean?"Soft or delicate in texture or consistence; yielding easily to force or pressure; fragile; easily broken, divided, compressed, or wounded," according to the dictionary, describes what tender means. Keats and Fitzgerald appear to be telling us that the night is particularly vulnerable in this way.
Is Tender Is the Night a book you should read?This book is a masterpiece from beginning to end, and I've read it numerous times, getting something new out of each reading. It is a tragedy, a romance, and a wellspring of rich, poetic prose.
To know more about bail visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30054626
#SPJ1
According to Section 33 of the Texas Bill of Rights (Article 1 of the Texas Constitution), Texans are guaranteed the right to use and access public beaches. This is not a right that is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Which concept allows Texas to grant its citizens more rights than those listed in the U.S. Constitution?
the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments
Equal Rights Amendment
independent state grounds
Answers
According to Section 33 of the Texas Bill of Rights (Article 1 of the Texas Constitution), Texans are guaranteed the right to use and access public beaches.
This is not a right that is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Independent state grounds allow Texas to grant its citizens more rights than those listed in the U.S. Constitution. This concept is the right answer.A state cannot take away rights that are protected under the U.S. Constitution. However, the U.S. Constitution allows the states to grant their citizens more rights than those listed in the federal Constitution. Independent state grounds concept allows states to provide additional rights to their citizens than the ones protected under the U.S. Constitution. This idea permits state courts to interpret their state constitutions and statutes to expand protections beyond those granted by the federal Constitution.
To know more about Constitution , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ11
A shopper brought suit in federal district court against a large retail store for negligence, as a result of the shopper having slipped and fallen in the store. The shopper alleged that the fall was caused by a wet floor. During discovery, the shopper requested production of a store surveillance video that showed her slip and fall. The retail store objected on the ground that the video constituted work product. The video was recorded in the ordinary course of business. The video was preserved, rather than recorded over, in anticipation that the slip and fall might eventuate in litigation. The shopper has moved to compel production of the videotape.
Should the court grant the shopper's motion to compel?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is "True".
Explanation:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
In this question, the statement is true because the videotape is not a work item.
The Procedures of Civil Procedure are indeed the lawsuit rules utilized in civil matters in England and Wales by the Court of Appeal, UK High court, and county courts. The CPR aimed at improving access to the courts by facilitating cost-effectiveness, speed, and easier for the quasi to understand.
A pre-trial hearing shall take place at the start of the hearings of the Court of Magistrates. These are designed to handle particular legal problems that need to be addressed before the trial begins.
quuzlet In Arizona v. Fulminante, the Court ruled that the harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving admissibility of:
Answers
the Court ruled that the harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving admissibility of involuntary confessions.
What are involuntary confessions?An involuntary confession that results from overwhelming police behavior rather than the defendant's free will is referred to as a pressured confession. Because the confession was not the result of the accused's free will, it is involuntary.
What are first signs of involuntary celibacy?Being obese Being thought of being physically unappealing Never having been in a romantic relationshipDoes the harmless error doctrine apply to involuntary confessions?The Court decided in Fulminante that situations regarding the admissibility of involuntary confessions fall under the harmless error theory.
Is Fulminante's confession to Sarivola admissible in court?It is crucial to assess the admissibility of Fulminante's confession to Sarivola in light of the finding by five Justices that the harmless error analysis extends to coerced confessions. For example, see Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U. S. 1, 45 (1989) (WHITE, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part).
Learn more about Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona:
https://brainly.com/question/3703825?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
in florida, a claim for relief must contain four elements, including:
Answers
In Florida, a claim for relief must contain four elements, a statement of jurisdiction, a statement of the legal basis for the claim, a demand for a Jury trial, and a demand for relief.
These elements must be included in any complaint or pleading filed in a Florida court in order for the claim to be considered valid. The statement of jurisdiction must identify the specific court and the basis for the court's authority to hear the claim. The claim must clearly establish that the court has the authority to hear and decide the case. It should specify the appropriate court and the legal basis for its jurisdiction, whether a state or federal court.
The statement of the legal basis must identify the specific legal theory or cause of action that the plaintiff is asserting. It should outline the specific facts and circumstances that form the basis of the claim and explain how the defendant's actions or omissions have caused harm or violated a legal right.
Demand for Jury Trial: If the plaintiff wishes to have a jury decide the case, the claim must include a demand for a jury trial. This alerts the court and the defendant that the plaintiff desires a jury to determine the facts and render a verdict.
Finally, the demand for relief should include a specific request for the desired remedy or relief sought by the plaintiff. This could consist of monetary compensation, injunctive relief, or any other appropriate form of relief the plaintiff seeks from the court.
Failure to include these elements can result in dismissal of the claim.
To learn more about jurisdiction, visit: https://brainly.com/question/14368704
#SPJ11
How has the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment changed police policies that now mandates in domestic violence cases in Illinois?
Answers
Answer:
Based on the results of the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment, which concluded that arrest was the most effective in most domestic violence cases, the Minneapolis Police Department started requiring police officials to use it as the main approach and to make a report on the reasons not to do it if they fail to do it.
Explanation:
The police policies were changed in March of 1984 and led to a record of people in jail on spouse assault charges.