When Liu Bang defeated Xiang Yu, which dynasty began?

Positive advertisements used to counteract negative advertisements lack the power of negative ads, according to University of Georgia researchers.

In recent decades, research on negative campaigning has expanded rapidly. This article looks at the research on this campaign strategy. It discusses its definition and measurement, highlighting the disparity between academic research and common perceptions. After that, it examines the reasons parties and candidates "go negative," with a focus on the reasons for negative campaigning in multi-party competition. The composition further talks about the writing on constituent impacts and more extensive cultural results of negative battling and underlines issues connected with information assortment and examination plans. The end sums up the best in class and layouts roads for future examination.

To learn more about advertisements visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29564877

#SPJ1

Answer:

BBBBB

Explanation:

Answer:

One way in which two kingdoms in Southeast Asia differed in the period c. 1200 to c. 1450 is their religion. The Srivijaya Empire and the Majapahit Kingdoms were both sea-based kingdoms in Southeast Asia.

Explanation:

The Delhi Sultanate and the Majapahit Empire differed in the official religion.

The Delhi Sultanate had their official religion as Islam and the Majapahit Empire was a Buddhist empire. They were both in South-East Asia but had different religions.

Thanks to the coming of Islam to South and Southeast Asia  from 1200 onwards:

In conclusion, Islam was hugely influential in South and South-east Asia during that time period and this led to Islam being established as a major religion there such that today, over 600 million Muslims live there.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/11366945.

According to the court's decision in Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., the right to conduct business as a corporation is valuable and justifies the application of a federal income tax. Prior to 1913, the majority of the federal government's income came from taxes on goods, namely tariffs on imported goods and excise taxes on goods like whisky.

Working Americans bore the brunt of these taxes since they spent a considerably higher proportion of their income on products than did wealthy individuals. Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling in Marbury v. Madison established the judicial review principle, a significant contribution to the "checks and balances" system designed to prevent any one branch of the federal government from becoming overly strong.

To learn more about  income tax, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/21595302

#SPJ4

From the late 19th century on, according to Ghani (2019), Bengali Muslims formed a pan-Islamic brotherhood against British imperialism. The answer is D.

The primary concern of the Bengali Muslims was the dominance of the British Empire, which had captured India and most of the Muslim world by the late 19th century.

A pan-Islamic brotherhood was created by Bengali Muslims to bring Muslims together in order to combat British imperialism. Bengali Muslims were constantly in a state of turmoil as a result of their political and economic status under British colonial rule. In the late 19th century, the growth of British power prompted a pan-Islamic brotherhood among Muslims in Bengal, who began to demand more rights and freedoms.

The correct answer is option D.

Learn more about British Empire:

https://brainly.com/question/13082368

#SPJ11

No one in my entire family had ever had artistic yearnings, so they looke dupon my girlish dreams as a rather silly and impractical phase, which I would surely outgrow and then settle down in Arkansas like my more sensible cousins.

They therefore considered my unrealistically idealistic goals to be a fairly ridiculous period that I would eventually grow out of before relocating to Arkansas with my more pragmatic cousins. It is clear from this phrase that the author's family did not share her ambitions and believed they were impractical and unlikely to be realised. "Settle down in Arkansas like my more practical cousins," the author wrote, "like my more practical cousins," suggesting that she may have started to question her own abilities and the sustainability of her goals. This realisation shows that the author may have initially overestimated her abilities and the likelihood that she would be able to realise her artistic goals, which is a common occurrence for many people who pursue their loves.

Learn more about Arakansas here:

https://brainly.com/question/16065615

#SPJ4

The forms of racism in Nazi Germany and Apartheid in South Africa shared similarities in their systematic oppression and discrimination based on race.

Both Nazi Germany and Apartheid South Africa implemented systems of racial segregation and discrimination that aimed to suppress and marginalize specific racial groups.

In Nazi Germany, the Jewish population was targeted for extermination while other minority groups such as Roma and Sinti people, disabled individuals and LGBTQ+ individuals also faced persecution. The Apartheid in South Africa enforced a legal framework that classified individuals into racial groups and denied basic rights and opportunities to the majority Black population.

Read more about discrimination

brainly.com/question/1084594

#SPJ1

The given statement "Starbucks in now the owner of the Keurig coffee machine?" is False because Starbucks is not the owner of the Keurig coffee machine.

Keurig is a subsidiary of Keurig Dr. Pepper, a publicly-traded company formed through the merger of Keurig Green Mountain and Dr Pepper Snapple Group in 2018. Starbucks, on the other hand, is a separate, publicly-traded company that primarily operates coffeehouses and sells coffee products.

While both Starbucks and Keurig are involved in the coffee industry, they operate independently and have distinct business models. Starbucks focuses on its coffeehouses, beverages, and branded merchandise, while Keurig is known for its single-serve coffee machines and K-Cup pods. It's worth mentioning that Starbucks and Keurig have collaborated in the past, such as when Starbucks began offering its coffee in Keurig's K-Cup format.

In conclusion, it is incorrect to say that Starbucks now owns the Keurig coffee machine, as they are separate companies with distinct business operations. The relationship between Starbucks and Keurig is one of collaboration and coexistence in the coffee industry, not one of ownership.

Know more about Starbucks here:

https://brainly.com/question/31574804

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. judicial review

Explanation:

just did quiz on edge 2020

The case of United States v. Stevens in 2010 is an example of the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review. Therefore option C is correct.

A judge analyzes the legality of a public body's decision or action in a court case called judicial review. To put it another way, court reviews focus more on the process of decision-making than the merits or shortcomings of the outcome.

It's important to note that judicial review cannot be utilized to contest the validity or substance of a public authority's decision. It only addresses whether the right procedure was followed in making the decision.

Determining whether public officials are acting in line with legislation passed by parliament is the primary goal of judicial review. It guarantees that the government, public institutions, and regulators may all be held accountable and protects individuals from the abuse of state power.

To learn more about Judicial Review follow the link.

https://brainly.com/question/966716

#SPJ6

Jefferson Davis was a prominent political figure in the mid-19th century and served as the President of the Confederate States of America during the American Civil War. Two facts about Davis's background that likely influenced or biased his point of view are:

1. Davis was raised in a slave-owning family in the South: Davis was born into a wealthy plantation family in Kentucky, and his family owned slaves. He grew up in a society that was deeply invested in slavery as a way of life and a source of wealth. This upbringing likely influenced Davis's perspective on issues related to slavery, race, and the rights of states.

2. Davis was a West Point graduate and veteran of the Mexican-American War: Davis graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point and served in the military for several years, including as a lieutenant colonel in the Mexican-American War. His military experience and training likely shaped his views on issues related to national defense, state sovereignty, and military strategy. This background may have contributed to his decision to support secession and the formation of the Confederacy, as he believed that states should have the right to govern themselves and protect their interests.

Answer:

United States of America

Explanation:

The new cuban government also embraced communism and this being during the Cold War, it made America mad and gave the USSR a new ally.

One type of large man-made construction of the ancient Near East that was built for the benefit of the living community rather than as a memorial to the dead is the ziggurat.

A ziggurat was a massive, stepped pyramid-like structure that was built in ancient Mesopotamia as a temple or religious center.

The ziggurat was not a tomb or monument to a specific individual or group, but rather a communal space that served as a focal point for religious and social activities.

The ziggurat was believed to be the home of the gods and was used as a place of worship, offerings, and rituals.

Learn more about the ziggurat:

https://brainly.com/question/14428296

#SPJ11

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Give brainliest

The correct statement is b. he was the leader of the union of arras. William the Silent was not the leader of the Union of Arras, but he played a crucial role in the Dutch Revolt and was a major leader during that time.

William the Silent, also known as William of Orange, was a prominent leader during the Dutch Revolt against Spanish rule in the 16th century. Among the options provided, the statement that is not true of William the Silent is b. he was the leader of the union of arras.

To clarify, a. he opposed Margaret of Parma and Cardinal Granvelle is true. William the Silent strongly opposed the policies of Margaret of Parma, who was the regent of the Spanish Netherlands, and Cardinal Granvelle, who was a high-ranking advisor to the Spanish king.

c. he was the first major leader assassinated with a handgun is also true. In 1584, William the Silent was assassinated by a French Catholic extremist using a handgun. This was a significant event in European history.

d. he held land in France (Orange) and Germany is also true. William the Silent owned significant land holdings in the Principality of Orange, which is now part of France, as well as properties in the Holy Roman Empire, which included parts of modern-day Germany.

In summary, the correct statement is b. he was the leader of the union of arras. William the Silent was not the leader of the Union of Arras, but he played a crucial role in the Dutch Revolt and was a major leader during that time.

Learn more about Spanish rule from given link: https://brainly.com/question/18520956

#SPJ11

The palace complex at Persepolis in Persia, built around 518 BCE, contained royal residences and a series of ceremonial halls and reception rooms.

The palace complex at Persepolis served as the ceremonial and administrative center of the Achaemenid Empire, a vast Persian empire that spanned from Egypt to India. It was constructed under the reign of King Darius the Great and continued to be expanded and embellished by subsequent kings. The complex consisted of various buildings, including the Apadana, or Audience Hall, which was the largest and most important structure.

The Apadana served as a grand reception hall where the king received and entertained guests, including foreign dignitaries and envoys. Other buildings within the complex included the Throne Hall, private royal residences, treasuries, and administrative offices. These structures showcased the wealth, power, and grandeur of the Achaemenid rulers and played a significant role in their governance and diplomatic activities.

To learn more about Empire click here:

brainly.com/question/29587302

#SPJ11

Yes, I have heard of the Northwest Indian War. It has become one of America's "forgotten wars" as it was overshadowed by the American Revolution, it did not involve any major battles, and it was part of a larger struggle for control of the West.

The war memory may be different from Indigenous Americans perspective as it represented a part of long struggle against colonization and forced displacement.

The Northwest Indian War took place between 1785 and 1795 and was fought between Native American tribes and the United States over control of the Northwest Territory. The Northwest Indian War has become one of America's "forgotten wars" for a variety of reasons.

The memory of the war would likely be very different from the perspective of Indigenous Americans. For them, the war was part of a long history of resistance to colonization and forced displacement. The war represented a threat to their way of life and their very survival, and its consequences were felt long after the fighting ended.

Today, we can represent those experiences by acknowledging the contributions and sacrifices of Indigenous people in the conflict, highlighting their perspectives and experiences, and working to address the ongoing legacy of colonization and oppression. We can also work to elevate Indigenous voices in our historical narratives and promote greater understanding and respect for their cultures and histories.

Learn more about Northwest Indian War:

https://brainly.com/question/29387221

#SPJ11

Answer:

A there Ancestors

Explanation:

Folk religion during the Shang dynasty was polytheistic, meaning the people worshipped many gods. This bronze sculpture of a human head with gold leaf is typical of the bronze artwork created during the Shang dynasty. Ancestor worship was also very important to the Shang.  ~~~~~Have a great day!

Answer: C. Only three-fifths of enslaved people should be counted as part of each state's population.

Explanation: Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

The Ottoman Empire, which was centered in what is now Turkey, had a significant impact on Eastern Europe during the time of its existence. The empire was one of the largest and most powerful in the world, and it controlled a vast territory that included much of Eastern Europe.

The Ottoman Empire had a complex relationship with the countries and peoples of Eastern Europe. At times, the empire exerted a great deal of control over the region, imposing its laws and customs on the local population. At other times, the empire was more lenient, allowing local rulers and communities to maintain a degree of autonomy.

The Ottoman Empire also had a major impact on the cultural, religious, and linguistic landscape of Eastern Europe. The empire was predominantly Muslim, and it spread the Islamic faith throughout the region. The Ottoman Empire also brought a number of new cultural practices and traditions to Eastern Europe, including the use of the Turkish language and the adoption of Turkish names and customs.

Overall, the impact of the Ottoman Empire on Eastern Europe was multifaceted and varied over time, but it left a lasting legacy on the region.

To learn more about the Ottoman Empire, check out https://brainly.com/question/8465989?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

I think the answer might be B) They are both constitutional monarchies.

Answer:

The Nullification Crisis was a sectional crisis during the presidency of Andrew Jackson created by South Carolina's 1832 Ordinance of Nullification. ... It declared that the federal Tariff of 1828 and of 1832 were unconstitutional and South Carolina just weren't going to follow them!In 1833, Henry Clay helped broker a compromise bill with Calhoun that slowly lowered tariffs over the next decade. The Compromise Tariff of 1833 was eventually accepted by South Carolina and ended the nullification crisis.

Explanation:

plz mark brainleist

Answer:

thought

Explanation:

Note that the English word 'purview' simply means one's range of interest. Admittedly, the field of Humanities focuses mainly on understanding the thought of people in the past and present, in a sense, it is constantly asking the question about the thoughts of people. Thereby, confirming it as their explicit purview.

Social issues have always been a part of American politics, but their significance has increased over time. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 60s brought issues of racial equality to the forefront of national attention.

The feminist movement of the 1970s brought attention to issues of gender equality, including reproductive rights and workplace discrimination. In the 1980s, social issues became increasingly important in the Republican Party's platform, as the conservative movement gained momentum. The party adopted a stance against abortion, homosexuality, and affirmative action, among other issues. This was partially in response to the growing influence of the religious right, which saw social issues as a way to influence public policy and promote their moral values.

Social issues also became important in the Democratic Party, as various groups pushed for greater rights and representation. The LGBT rights movement gained significant momentum in the 1990s and 2000s, leading to the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in the military and the legalization of same-sex marriage. Today, social issues continue to shape US politics, with ongoing debates over abortion, immigration, healthcare, and gun control, among other topics. As the country becomes more diverse and socially liberal, social issues are likely to remain a prominent factor in American politics for the foreseeable future.

Learn more about discrimination from here:

https://brainly.com/question/29801080

#SPJ11

The reason why the independence movement in Brazil was unique to South America was that it 1) led to few real societal reforms.

Unlike the other nations in South America who had to fight for their independence and then completely overthrow the Spanish colonial masters and their societal norms, Brazil did not have that. Instead, Brazil did not see a war of independence, and the societal norms that went on in colonial Brazil still continued into the new nation.

The reason for this was that independence in Brazil was declared by the Portuguese royal family in Brazil. The Regent decided to declare independence when Portugal was weak from the Napoleonic wars. As a result, power essentially passed from the Portuguese to the Portuguese and so not much changed.

Find out more on Brazilian independence at https://brainly.com/question/25992209

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

Men where thought to be superior back in the old days.

Answer:

A court painter was an artist who painted for the members of a royal or princely family, sometimes on a fixed salary and on an exclusive basis where the artist was not supposed to undertake other work. Painters were the most common, but the court artist might also be a court sculptor.

Explanation:

An artist who painted only for the members of a royal or princely family, sometimes at a fixed income and with the restriction that the artist does not take on other work, was known as a court painter.

An artist who painted only for the individuals of a royal and princely family, sometimes at a fixed income and with the restriction that the artist does not take on other work, was known as a court painter. The most frequent kind of court artists were painters, although they might also be court painters.

At some point in their careers, court painters included the Limbourg brothers, Jan Van Eyck, Mantegna, Piero della Francesca, Leonardo da Vinci, Albrecht Dürer, Hans Holbein, Michelangelo, and Peter Paul Rubens, to name a few.

Portraits of both the royal family as well as their courtiers were painted by court painters, who were artists paid by royal courts. Royal courts were a significant area of patronage for the arts up until the modern era.

Learn more about the Court painter here:

https://brainly.com/question/4345171

#SPJ5

Answer: The balance of power in Eastern Europe was realigned in 1721 with the Peace of Nystad.

Explanation: The Peace of Nystad was a treaty signed in 1721 between Sweden and Russia, ending the Great Northern War. The war had been fought between Sweden and a coalition of Russia, Denmark-Norway, and Saxony-Poland-Lithuania over control of the Baltic region.

The treaty was signed in the town of Nystad (now Uusikaupunki) in Finland and resulted in significant territorial gains for Russia, including control over the Baltic provinces of Livonia, Estonia, and Ingria. The treaty also recognized the ascension of Peter the Great of Russia as the dominant power in the region, marking a shift in the balance of power in Eastern Europe.

The Peace of Nystad was a significant milestone in the history of the region, marking the decline of Sweden as a major power and the rise of Russia as a dominant force in Eastern Europe.