what is called"legal order that guarantees a prisoner the right to be heard in court"?

Answer:

no

Explanation:

It is not recorded into one comprehensive piece of legislation.

Answer:

Description of Criminal Act: A man with a gun forcefully pushed a man who was stopped at a red light off of his motorcycle. The gunman then hopped on the motorcycle and sped off.

Type of Crime: Robbery

Property or Violent Crime:

Violent (The man had a "gun", this could be a threat of harm. Making the other man not to fight the gunman for his bike back. The gunman then forcefully pulled the man off his motorcycle.

Explanation:

Making a citizens arrest may vary my state, but we will use California as a reference.

California Penal Code 837 PC allows any private individual to make a citizen's arrest However, the private individual witnessed the crime.

Examples of when a citizens arrest can occur: When a public crime/offence is committed in their presence, a person has committed a felony, and the person has reasonable cause to believe that they committed this act.

An example of a citizens arrest: You are shopping in a store when you notice a woman steal and walk out. You may then detain her until the police arrive.

When making a citizens arrest, you CANNOT:

- Use force to detain the suspect

- Create danger that may harm others or the suspect

- Search the suspect

- Chase the suspect in risky situations

However, when Police are considered to make an arrest they need probable cause. This does not need to be witnessed by the officer(s).

When Police have enough evidence to make an arrest, they can:

- Use force to arrest the suspect

- Search the suspect

- Use lethal force if needed

- Chase after the suspect

These reflect a few differences law enforcement and citizens can do when arresting a suspect.

The court ruled in favor of the student, finding that the university violated the Rehabilitation Act by not providing reasonable accommodations for the student's disability.

The court found that the university had not provided the student with the opportunity to participate in intercollegiate basketball and had instead imposed an unreasonable blanket restriction on his ability to do so.

The court found that the university had failed to consider reasonable modifications that would have allowed the student to participate in the sport and that the university's decision constituted discrimination based on disability. The court ordered the university to provide reasonable accommodation and reinstate the student's eligibility to participate in intercollegiate basketball.

To know more about Rehabilitation Act, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13032255

#SPJ4

By judicial interpretation, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution restricts the federal government.

The Due process Clause of the Fourteenth change is precisely like a similar provision within the 5th change, which best restricts the federal authorities. It states that no man or woman shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or assets without a due method of regulation.” typically, “due manner” refers to truthful strategies.

Delivered to cope with the racial discrimination continued via Black individuals who were recently emancipated from slavery, the amendment showed the rights and privileges of citizenship and, for the first time, assured all people equal protection beneath the legal guidelines.

Learn more about amendment here brainly.com/question/687600

#SPJ4

The given statement, "Body scanners, also known as metal detectors, are becoming obsolete due to budget concerns." is false as security is a matter of concern in every country.

With no need to remove clothing or make direct physical touch, a full-body scanner is a gadget that identifies things on or within the body of a person for security screening. Full-body scanners, as opposed to metal detectors, may identify non-metal objects, which became a growing worry after a number of failed airplane bom-bing attempts in the 2000s. Some scanners can even find things that have been eaten or are concealed in a person's bodily cavities. Metal detectors at airports and train stations in several nations began to be supplemented by full-body scanners beginning in 2007.

Full-body scanners were going to be installed by the Italian government at every airport and railway station in the nation, but in September 2010 they revealed plans to take them out of airports because they were "slow and useless."

Learn more about Metal Detectors here:

https://brainly.com/question/9023416

#SPJ4

Answer:

Here is the short story:

The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.

Explanation:

The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off.  The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.

Answer:a disenfectant?

Explanation:alcohol disenfects wounds

Here's what will happen if the President does not return a bill and refuses to sign it:

- It means the President is effectively exercising their veto power.

- Yet, unless the Congress isn't in session during those ten (10) days, the bill will automatically become a law, though.

- The U.S. Constitution states that a vetoed bill may still become law if Congress overrides the president's decision with a supermajority vote of two-thirds of members of both the House and the Senate.

What is this veto power anyway?

To veto means to forbid or temporarily prohibit the execution of projects that have been attempted. However, since we're discussing the President's and the legislative branch's authority, vetoing refers to stopping a bill or the implementation of legislation passed by a legislature from becoming law, either permanently or temporarily.

Read about the concept of a pocket veto here: https://brainly.com/question/957050

#SPJ4

Answer:

The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States. The development of universal manhood suffrage.

The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States was the establishment of the Constitution, which laid the foundation for a democratic government by creating a system of checks and balances, protecting individual rights, and promoting the principle of majority rule.

The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States is the fact that the country is governed by a system that places ultimate power in the hands of the people. This is achieved through free and fair elections, where every citizen has the right to vote and express their opinions on the issues that matter to them. The fact that the United States has been able to maintain a stable democracy for over two centuries is a testament to the strength and resilience of this system. Additionally, the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights enshrine the principles of democracy, including the protection of individual rights and freedoms. These documents provide a framework for the government to operate within, and ensure that the voices of the people are heard and respected. Overall, the supremacy of democracy in the United States is evident in the country's political institutions, legal system, and culture.

learn more about democracy

https://brainly.com/question/21256069

#SPJ11

Answer:

S C E N A R I O 1

Gennie, an eighteen year old college

student, is arrested for stealing a

classmate’s designer sweater and

selling it on eBay. When Gennie

appears before the judge, she asks

for a lawyer to help defend her. e

judge tells Gennie that if she is smart

enough to be in college, she knows

enough to defend herself. Besides, she

is not charged with a felony, so the

stakes are not very high.

S C E N A R I O 2

Susette bought a house and spent

years restoring it. She loves her home.

One day, she gets a notice that the

local government is going to take her

property in order to turn her land

over to a private company. e local

government says it can take Susette’s

home because the new jobs and tax

revenue created by the company will

benet the public.

S C E N A R I O 3  

Carolyn is arrested for shopliing a

candy bar from a grocery store. At

trial, she is found guilty. e judge

decides that the right punishment is

to cut o Carolyn’s hands so she will

not be able to shopli again.

S C E N A R I O 4

Congress wants to nd ways to cut

costs because of the soaring budget

decit. Congress passes a law to

require American citizens to house

US soldiers in their homes during

peacetime.

S C E N A R I O 5

Brett’s science teacher asks the class to

exchange papers to correct last night’s

homework. Brett refuses to let anyone

except the teacher see his homework

paper, and is sent to the principal.

S C E N A R I O 6

Concerned about rising crime,

lawmakers for the District of

Columbia ban all handguns in the

city, and require that shot-guns be

kept unloaded and/or disassembled.

S C E N A R I O 7

John, a fourteen year old public

school student, wears a shirt to school

that says “Be happy, not gay” to

express his belief that homosexuality

is wrong. His dean tells him he must

change his shirt or be suspended

from school. John refuses, and is

suspended for a week.

S C E N A R I O 8

irteen year old Marianne is a

freshman in high school. She is an

honor student and wants to sing in

the choir. When she arrives at choir

practice, the teacher tells her she

must take a drug test if she wants to

participate in any extra-curricular

activities. Marianne refuses and is

kicked out of choir.

S C E N A R I O 9

A man suspected of a violent crime

is brought in to the police station.

e alleged victim picks him out of a

lineup as the man who attacked her.

Police inform him that he has the

right to refuse to answer questions,

but they do not oer to let him speak

to a lawyer. Aer being questioned

for two hours, the man admits the

crime.

S C E N A R I O 1 0

Elizabeth is twelve years old. Her

parents are very religious, but she

is not. Once a week, Elizabeth’s

parents make her come with them

to their place of worship. Elizabeth

always says she does not want to go,

but her parents make her come with

them anyway.

S C E N A R I O 1 1

Members of Congress are unhappy

with students’ standardized test

scores. ey pass a federal law that

abolishes local school boards and

requires a national, standardized

curriculum.

S C E N A R I O 1 2

A public school principal smells smoke

in the hallway, and believes it is coming

from the girls’ bathroom. She walks

into the bathroom and nds Susan

standing by the sink. She suspects

Susan has been smoking, and demands

to search her purse for cigarettes or

other evidence of smoking.

The conventional level of moral reasoning is consistent with making decisions based on societal standards and learned from parents.

Making decisions based on moral principles acquired from parents or social norms is consistent with the common moral reasoning level. At this point, people uphold societal norms and laws in an effort to preserve social harmony and order. They consider the demands and viewpoints of their family, friends, and community and place a high value on conformity and approval from others.

The desire to be perceived as a good or "law-abiding" person influences moral judgments and the emphasis is placed on performing obligations, showing respect for authority, and abiding by accepted norms.

However, the conventional level of moral reasoning is constrained because it disregards individual rights and justice as well as critically questions societal norms. Although higher stages of moral development offer more sophisticated and nuanced moral reasoning, this stage is still significant.

Learn more about moral reasoning at:

brainly.com/question/30437162

#SPJ4

In some cases, bartenders and bar owners can be held liable for a plaintiff's injury even if they did not directly cause the injury. This is typically known as "dram shop liability" or "social host liability."

Dram shop liability refers to the legal responsibility of a bar or restaurant that serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes harm to others. In these cases, the bar or restaurant can be held liable for the injuries caused by the intoxicated person.Social host liability, on the other hand, applies to individuals who host private parties or events where alcohol is served.

If a host continues to serve alcohol to a visibly intoxicated guest who subsequently causes harm to others, the host can be held responsible for the injuries.The basis for holding bartenders and bar owners liable in these situations is the recognition of their duty to exercise reasonable care in serving alcohol and preventing harm to others. By serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person, they may be seen as contributing to the person's impairment and the resulting harm caused.

It's important to note that dram shop liability laws vary by jurisdiction, so the specific rules and standards may differ depending on the state or country. It is recommended to consult local laws and legal professionals for specific guidance in a particular jurisdiction.

To know more about liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31356106
#SPJ11

Answer:

acfel

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

absolutely not

Answer:

Explanation:

All costs are borne by the borrower in this case. the lender or the borrower indicates that it wishes the funds to be returned within a short period of time.

have a nice day :9

Answer: number 3 A seller has a critical piece of information that immediately affects the transaction.

Explanation:

The criminal charge against Tony is a result of the District Attorney's Office  bringing off him for assault and  thievery. This is a felonious case brought by the government against Tony for violating felonious laws.

The purpose of the felonious case is to  discipline Tony and to  cover society from his  conduct.The action filed by Jane against Tony is a civil action. Civil  conduct are brought by private  individualities or  realities to seek compensation for damages suffered. In this case, Jane is seeking  money damages from Tony for the  detriment she suffered as a result of his  conduct.

The purpose of this action is to compensate Jane for her losses, and not to  discipline Tony. The standard of  evidence in a civil case is lower than in a felonious case, and the remedies available in a civil case are limited to  financial compensation.

To learn more about Legal Action on Money Damages:

https://brainly.com/question/5063656

#SPJ4

Answer:

True

Explanation: this is Correct!

Answer:

Due process

Explanation:

Everyone has a right to an attorney, rich or poor.
There must be fair treatment in the system so no matter who you are or what you've done, you will be appointed an attorney because the law states you have a right to one.

Due process; fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement.

Answer:

Establishing factor is fear of violations and ending factor is prisoner's right movement.

Explanation:

The most important factors that is responsible for establishing the "Hands Off Doctrine" are fear of violations and to avoid collision between arms of government. Courts feared that separation of powers and federalism would be violated if courts intervened in the work of institutions related to the state. The hands-off doctrine ended of two factors i.e. the prisoner's right movement and activism of federal judges. The hands-off doctrine formally ended with two decisions taken by the  Supreme Court in the early 1970s.

Answer:

succesional wave of insects

maggot age

Explanation:

As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.

A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.

In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.

Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.

Learn more about forensic entomologist here:

https://brainly.com/question/14403044

#SPJ2

Answer:

Harvard law school

Explanation:

As the Historical jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law.

In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts.

It is possible to think of this school as the school of the evolutionary process. Its emphasis is still on the development and history of the legal system. it holds that prior laws and rulings will continue to be valid in the present and the future.

Therefore, As a result, By the historic school of thought relies the most on precedent in establishing law

Learn more about the law here:

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ6

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

Answer:

To steer the car in reverse, turn the wheel in the direction you want the rear of the car to go. Turning the wheel to the right steers the back of the car to the right. Turning the wheel to the left steers to the left.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

As the city manager and knowing that the budget is tight, I would choose to raise taxes and cut programs. The programs I would choose would be the ones that have less impact in the medium to lower classes. I would establish the priorities of the government that clearly are the creation of jobs and health services. I would sell my idea to the city council and the residents of your city that this is the best option in that I would tell them that these are temporary measures while the economic situation could be transformed in 6 to 12 months. The government would save some money stopping unnecessary expenditure, and there will be some financial incentives to entrepreneurs and businessmen that decide to create new business in the city.

No, people living with HIV should not be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status.

HIV is a virus, rather than a crime, and its transmission between consenting adults should not be criminalized. While disclosure of HIV status is important for reducing the risk of transmission, forcing those with HIV to disclose is not always in the interests of public health, and can be a violation of autonomy and privacy.

The legality of disclosing one's HIV status should be left to the individual to decide, and if other precautions have been taken, it should not be legally required.

To know more about HIV , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31765366

#SPJ4

The courts consider several factors when determining an application for postponement of a possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor. Here is a step-by-step evaluation of these considerations:

1. Lack of concrete evidence: When the mortgagor fails to provide concrete evidence to support their application for postponement of possession, the courts may consider this as a factor against granting the request. Concrete evidence could include valid reasons for the delay or evidence of financial hardship.

2. Reason for the postponement: The courts will evaluate the reason provided by the mortgagor for seeking a postponement. If the reason is deemed valid, such as unforeseen circumstances or financial difficulties, the courts may be more inclined to grant the application.

3. Merits of the case: The courts will assess the overall merits of the case, including any defenses raised by the mortgagor. If the mortgagor has a strong legal argument or valid defense, the courts may consider this in favor of postponing the possession order.

4. Balance of interests: The courts will weigh the interests of both parties involved, including the mortgagor and the mortgagee. They will consider factors such as the potential harm to the mortgagor if possession is granted, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of the mortgagee.

5. Good faith efforts: The courts will evaluate whether the mortgagor has made good faith efforts to address the issue and resolve any outstanding obligations. This could include attempts to negotiate with the mortgagee, seek financial assistance, or make partial payments.

In conclusion, when determining an application for postponement of a possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor, the courts critically evaluate factors such as the lack of evidence, the reason for the postponement, the merits of the case, the balance of interests, and the mortgagor's good faith efforts. These considerations help the courts make a fair and informed decision.

Learn more about ' Evidence in Courts' https://brainly.com/question/23323608

#SPJ11