What are some types of laws? Explain.
Answers
Tort Law.
EU Law.
Equity & Trusts.
Criminal Law.
Contract Law
constitution law
Related Questions
How does the Bill of Rights apply to you as a member of this nation? (2-3 complete sentences)
Answers
Answer:
The first amendment of the bill of rights guarantees the right of freedom from establishment of religion, the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. The entire bill of rights guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion.
For Part 2 of this activity, you will be exploring the roles of citizens on the local, state, and federal level. Do you feel that being an active participant in the equality of women (or any people for that matter) is the responsibility of citizens? Though many people would answer ‘yes’ to this question, it is not a mandatory responsibility for citizens. But, what are the mandatory responsibilities of citizens? Visit the suggested websites (or any others that you find useful) and fill in the chart below separating the responsibilities of citizens into either local, state, or federal. Find at least four for each column. Be sure to indicate if each responsibility is Mandatory or Voluntary (note that some responsibilities may fall into more than one category).
Answers
Local, state, and federal responsibilities of residents can be divided into these three groups are the mandatory.
Following the law, paying taxes, serving on juries, attending school, maintaining the law, and defending the United States are just a few of the obligations that all citizens must fulfil.
Voting, expressing thoughts and comments, performing community service, and appreciating diversity are some optional duties of citizens. If citizens are expected to fulfil both mandatory and optional duties at the local, state, and federal levels, such as abiding by the law, paying taxes, and serving on juries.
Learn more about on mandatory, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14485615
#SPJ1
Compare the Bill of Rights from our last unit with the International Human rights Law from
this unit, pick two rights that are in one but not the other and explain why you think this
happened.
Answers
When comparing the Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, with International Human Rights Law, represented primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), there are indeed rights that are present in one but not the other. Two such examples are:
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (in the Bill of Rights, specifically the Second Amendment): This right is not explicitly present in International Human Rights Law, as articulated in the UDHR. The reason for this omission can be attributed to the different historical, cultural, and legal contexts of the United States compared to the international community. The right to bear arms holds significant historical and constitutional significance in the United States due to its association with self-defense, the protection of individual liberties, and the historical context of the American Revolution.The Right to Asylum (in International Human Rights Law, specifically Article 14 of the UDHR): This right is not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights. The absence of this right in the Bill of Rights can be attributed to the fact that the United States Constitution primarily focuses on the relationship between the government and its citizens, whereas the right to asylum relates to the treatment of individuals seeking refuge in a country due to fear of persecution in their home country. Asylum is a concept more closely associated with international law and human rights frameworks, addressing the rights and protections of individuals across borders.These differences highlight how legal documents and frameworks can reflect the unique historical, cultural, and legal contexts of a particular country, shaping the specific rights enshrined within them.For more such questions on Amendments
https://brainly.com/question/458137
#SPJ8
Are the Police are too extreme today because of how dangerous our world has become? or is the world the same and the Police are just too extreme? Which do you believe and why?
Answers
Answer:
A mix of both.
Explanation:
I personally believe that it's a mix of both the options and that the world has become more dangerous than it was in the past but also much of the media focuses on the negative side of the police force and tell us about the rougher side instead of the bright side about them.
2 p
Who are the two Senators in Ohio, please choose two of the options
below.
Answers
Answer:
Rob Portman and Sherrod Brown
Explanation:
Brown is a Democrat and Rob is Republican
Answer:
Explanation:
rob portman and sherrod brown
How may negative
externalities lead to market failures? Should government
correct the failures caused by externalities?
Answers
Answer:
Externalities lead to market failure because a product or service's price equilibrium does not accurately reflect the true costs and benefits of that product or service
Why do we see more kids from poor neighborhoods go to prison compared to kids from more privileged neighborhoods and upbringings? Explain your reasons and use evidence from the video.
Answers
Answer:
Children from poor neighbourhoods go to prison because they suffer harassment by law enforcement and police violence.
Ms Goffman said in her speech, when she talks about what happened to the two boys, Tim and Chuck, that if they lived in a neighbourhood where children go to university, like the one where she grew up, where privileged people live, they would not have gone through what they went through because, in her neighbourhood, young people do exactly the same thing with impunity.
Discuss the ways in which we are seeing progress in the criminal justice system today and explain what spurred this change.
Prison is expensive, about $40,000 a year is the price to pay for sending a young person to prison in New Jersey. This amount, being paid for by the taxpayer, is most useful and beneficial when used to provide education and support to young people.
This approach has already begun to be used successfully in several states in the United States (New York, New Jersey and California) and has resulted in fewer people being incarcerated, closed institutions and lower crime rates.
The United States Congress is working on reforming the criminal justice system to make it less unjust.
A criminal justice system that prioritises prevention and civic inclusion, that is able to recognise the legacy of exclusion faced by poor people of colour, is a fair system.
“When most members of the jury in criminal trials DONT understand legal jargon or judges directions, how can the accused get a fair trial? Discuss to what extent you agree with this statement.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is, yes. A jury must all agree together that an accused is guilty or not-guilty. It must be unanimous, unless the jury is allowed to consider a majority verdict pls mark me branilest
Suppose there are 200 people total in the neighborhood where the robbery occurred. Let’s say that given a sample size of 30 people in the neighborhood, 5 of them were wearing black jeans and 2 of them were wearing a purple t-shirt. How many people can you narrow down this class evidence to?
Answers
Explanation:
It's difficult to accurately narrow down the class evidence to a specific number of people without additional information. The sample size of 30 people is relatively small in comparison to the total neighborhood population of 200. Additionally, knowing that 5 people were wearing black jeans and 2 were wearing a purple t-shirt doesn't provide enough information to accurately estimate the total number of people wearing those specific items of clothing in the neighborhood.
However, if we assume that the sample of 30 people is representative of the larger population, we can estimate that approximately 33% of the neighborhood population (or 66 out of 200 people) are wearing black jeans, and approximately 10% of the population (or 20 out of 200 people) are wearing a purple t-shirt. This is based on the assumption that the proportion of people wearing black jeans or a purple t-shirt in the sample of 30 people is representative of the proportion in the larger population.
It's important to note that this is just an estimate and not a definitive answer, as there could be a variety of factors that could affect the accuracy of this estimate.
Frequency of black jeans: 5/30 = 1/6
Frequency of purple t-shirts: 2/30 = 1/15
To estimate the number of people in the neighborhood who were wearing black jeans, we can multiply the frequency by the total population:
Estimated number of people wearing black jeans: (1/6) x 200 = 33.33
To estimate the number of people in the neighborhood who were wearing purple t-shirts, we can use the same approach:
Estimated number of people wearing purple t-shirts: (1/15) x 200 = 13.33
Since we cannot have a fraction of a person, we need to round the estimates to the nearest whole number. Therefore, based on the class evidence of black jeans and purple t-shirts, we can narrow down the potential suspects to approximately 33 people wearing black jeans and 13 people wearing purple t-shirts in the neighborhood where the robbery occurred.
An internet provider has been the only one available in the county for many years. A small startup has recently opened,
offering customers internet at a much lower rate. The original internet provider buys the building that is being rented by
the startup and raises their rent to an unfair amount. This makes it impossible for the startup to stay in business. If
brought to the attention of authorities, what kind of crime would the company MOST likely be accused of?
false advertising
O
restraint of trade
price fixing
fraud
Answers
If brought to the attention of authorities, restraint of trade is the kind of crime that the company would most likely be accused of
Define restraint of tradeAn employer's risk of a legal conflict with one of its former employees is significantly reduced by a correctly drafted restraint of trade clause. The employee is made aware that until a specific amount of time has passed, they cannot work for a company that is a direct competitor of their former employer.
The enforceability of contractual limitations on the right to conduct business is governed by the common law notion known as restraints of commerce. It is the forerunner of contemporary competition law. An agreement not to trade is void and unenforceable against the promisor because it runs counter to the public policy of promoting trade, unless the restraint of trade is necessary to safeguard the interests of the business buyer.
To learn more about crime, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29308572
#SPJ1
Paper currency in the United States was redesigned twice to input specific currency measures to make it more difficult to counterfeit. The first redesign was in 1. ____________
Answers
Answer:
hi brother have you have your lunch please tell your Mom to make piazza
Answer:
to make it easier to identify counterfeit bills
Explanation:
Reread this sentence from the lesson:
The more widespread voting became, the more the nation truly became “of the people.”
Which principle of American democracy is most closely associated with the expansion of voting rights?
A. checks and balances
B. federalism
C. popular sovereignty
D. rule of law
Answers
The principle of American democracy that is most closely associated with the expansion of voting rights is C. popular sovereignty.
What is popular sovereignty ?The fundamental principle of popular sovereignty prevails whereby the government's power source is derived from people’s consent, hence recognizing that individuals hold ultimate political authority hence in democratic systems allowing for active participation options such as voting.
Over the years with America expanding its voter registry to include all race genders and property owners regardless of status from solely white male landowners. These transformations have paved way towards creating a genuinely democratic society echoing pervasive principles of democracy through the increased levels of enfranchisement endorsement pivotal points.
Find out more on popular sovereignty at https://brainly.com/question/28745095
#SPJ1
The importance and benefit of the 'rule of law' as a democratic principle which supports a democracy
Answers
Explanation:
The rule of law, defended by an independent judiciary, plays a crucial function by ensuring that civil and political rights and civil liberties are safe and that the equality and dignity of all citizens are not at risk.This chapter discusses that drug use can have both positive and negative results, depending on how it is used and why. Do you think a drug that is currently illegal but is found to have some positive results in the medical field should be completely
outlawed for any type of use? Think of heroin or cocaine, it is illegal to use or possess in the U.S. but if something positive could come from the use do you think it should be allowed. Explain your answer. 2 cited sources.
Answers
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide a balanced perspective on the topic. The question of whether a currently illegal drug with potential medical benefits should be completely outlawed for any type of use is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach.
On one hand, it is important to consider the potential benefits that such drugs can have in the medical field. For example, studies have shown that heroin-assisted treatment can be an effective option for treating opioid addiction (Kerr et al., 2017). Similarly, cocaine has been used as a local anesthetic in eye surgery and is still used in some countries for that purpose (Narvaez, 2014). Banning the use of these drugs outright may prevent patients from receiving effective treatment for their medical conditions.
On the other hand, legalizing drugs with a history of abuse and addiction carries significant risks. It may lead to increased availability, misuse, and addiction, especially among vulnerable populations such as teenagers and low-income individuals. Additionally, drug legalization may send the wrong message to society that drug use is acceptable and may lead to an increase in crime rates, accidents, and public health costs.
In conclusion, while the potential medical benefits of currently illegal drugs should be considered, the risks of legalization should also be carefully evaluated. A thorough analysis of the benefits and risks, as well as the potential impact on public health and safety, should guide any decision regarding drug policy.
Law that promote or favors the use organic farming in agriculture At SA
Answers
ANSWER :
WTO law clearly favours their use.When a school bus stops to unload children on a divided highway with no median, vehicles traveling in the
same direction as the bus must
Keep moving at the normal speed of traffic.
Slow down and proceed with caution.
Stop until the stop signal on the bus is withdrawn.
Answers
Answer:
Stop until the stop signal on the bus is withdrawn.
Explanation:
On all undivided highways (without a median), traffic in both directions must stop at least 20 feet from a stopped school bus that has its red lights flashing. You must not pass the bus until the lights are turned off or the bus starts moving. You should always remember that the stop sign and flashing lights on the bus is always treated as a stop sign.
intellectual property law is a body of law that includes
Answers
Answer:
Use paper bags, envelopes, boxes and similar materials for all biological evidence. Avoid plastic packaging as an inner or outer package. Avoid the use of pill tins due to possible rust. Ensure that all swabs and evidence are dry.
Explanation:
During a criminal trial process, whom does the jury inform after arriving at a verdict?
In a criminal trial process, the jury informs the
after arriving at a verdict.
Answers
Answer:
They inform the Defendant of the verdict.
Why do appeals courts have oral arguments if they already have briefs describing the issues in the appeal? (Select all that apply.)
Because it is not possible to understand the issues from a brief.
To get more information from the attorneys.
To have a chance to ask the lawyers questions.
To learn why the attorney appealed the case.
Answers
Answer:
Because it is not possible to understand the issues from a brief.
Police are investigating a series of bike thefts in the area. They think that the bikes are being stolen by a woman who owns the local bike shop. Police
wait until she leaves the shop and then peer into the windows. They don't see anything out of the ordinary, but one tries the door handle. It is not locked.
Inside, they find one of the stolen bikes! They make an arrest, but later the case is dismissed. The police are frustrated because they know for sure that
this woman is the bike thief, but the prosecutor says that they cannot mention the bikes in the woman's shop. What is MOST likely the reason behind
this?
O A.
B.
C.
D.
The police were not certain that a crime had been committed yet.
The police did not read the woman her Miranda, warning when arresting her.
The woman and the judge are close friends, so he let her slide.
The bikes cannot be used as evidence because of the exclusionary rule.
Answers
need help with 23 and 24.
Answers
23. The court can judge the constitutionality of a state university's action depends on the circumstances and the legal issues involved. In general, courts can review the actions of state universities and determine whether they comply with the requirements of the Constitution and other applicable laws.
However, in the case of Ewing v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, the court held that it did not have jurisdiction to interfere with the academic decisions of the university. The court recognized that academic decisions made by universities are entitled to a high degree of deference, and that the university has the right to set academic standards and requirements for its students. The court also found that Ewing's interest in retaking the exam did not rise to the level of a property or liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause. The court noted that the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause applies only when a person's life, liberty, or property is at stake. The court also noted that Ewing had not been expelled from the university or denied the opportunity to complete his education, and therefore his interest in retaking the exam did not rise to the level of a liberty interest.
What is constitutionally vague?24. It can be argued that the Kentucky state statute in question is unconstitutionally vague, as it does not provide clear guidance on what constitutes "upbraiding," "insulting," or "abusing" a teacher in the presence of a student. The language used in the statute is subjective and open to interpretation, which could lead to arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement.
However, in the case of Com. v. Ashcraft, the court held that the statute was not unconstitutionally vague. The court found that the terms used in the statute have a common and ordinary meaning that would be understood by the average person. Additionally, the court noted that the statute requires the presence of a student as a limiting factor, which provides further clarity on what conduct is prohibited.
Therefore, in this specific case, the court did not agree that the statute was unconstitutionally vague. However, it is important to note that the issue of vagueness is highly fact-specific and can depend on the specific circumstances of each case.
Learn more about what's unconstitutionally here;
https://brainly.com/question/30722668
#SPJ1
transportation of information such as words, sounds or
images over long distances in the form of telegraphs,
telephones, radio or television
Answers
Answer:
Telecommunication
Explain the role stare decisis likely played in the wesberry v. Sanders decision.
Answers
The role Stare decisis role in weberry v Sanders decision is that it help the court to rule using the existing Constitution. The court had to follow it doctrine.
Stare Decisis roleStare decisis refers to Court's doctrine which is taking into consideration before making their decisions. Stare decisis means “to stand by things
In 1963, James P. Wesberry lived in a Georgia congressional district which had higher population than thecongressional districts in the state. He said that is vote did not count and is not rendered value d because there was only one member of
Congress for each congressional district because the state failed to adjust.
For the congressional districts to meet the changing population. Wesberry sought for ways inorder to prevent Georgia government from conducting elections under the current form of district system. The district court dismissed his complaint, He then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court opinion and vadity was that congressional districts must have almost equal populations compare to each other. The court further held that the state apportionment statute was invalid because it did not follow the Constitution.
Therefore, The role Stare decisis role in weberry v Sanders decision is that it help the court to rule using the existing Constitution. The court had to follow it doctrine.
Learn more about stare Decisis from.the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/1673584
Officer Milloy arrives at the scene of a burglary. He observes a man running away
from the scene holding something in his hand. Officer Milloy has both pepper spray
and a revolver. He follows the alleged burglar and tries to talk to him. The man
charges at him holding a screwdriver. Officer Milloy shoots and kills him.
Answers
Answer:
thats good right im confused on the question
Police Officers are trained to Shoot a Person if they have a weapon or a things that can cause harm to the officer. Here the Officer tries to talk to the suspect but the alleged burglar charges at him with a sharp weapon that could be fatal.
__________ is the doctrine that provides that a court can hold one or more parties to a claim equally liable for part of or the entire judgment awarded.
Answers
Answer:
Is it the doctrine of alternative liability?
Explanation:
The CURVE ahead sign tells you a
curve is coming. When does a CURVE
become a TURN?
Answers
Answer:
When it can be safely navigated at a speed slower than 35mph.
How much of your monthly income should go to mortgage.
Answers
Explanation:
The 28% rule states that you should spend 28% or less of your monthly gross income on your mortgage payment I hope that help
If neighbours have a fight should they should it together or should they go to court?
Answers
It's impossible to pick out a drunk driver until it is too late.
A. True
B. False
Answers
Is going to court the only way to handle this problem? What alternatives are there and which do you think would work best?
Answers
This is because it’s like court, but with many “judges” discussing the problem you gave them. This process is faster but it is possible that you will not get what you want out of this, because it is less formal and less strict.
Hope this helped
-Celeste