Answers
The given statement "If a restriction imposed on speech by the government is content neutral, then a court will not allow it." is false as even though speech can possibly be subject to some reasonable restrictions, if the restriction is content neutral the court will allow it.
Even the freedom to speech is a right, under certain instances of a misconduct like violence or obscenity, the court might hold the statute to be a unconstitutional restriction to speech.
Reasonable restrictions can be imposed or implied on the freedom of speech as well as the expression which will be in the interest of the security of the State. The term security of state itself has to be distinguished from the public order.
To know more about freedom to speech
https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ4
Related Questions
a company's legal and accounting teams have decided it would be more cost-effective to offload the risks of data storage to a third party. the itmanagement team has decided to implement a cloud model and has asked the security team for recommendations. which of the following willallow all data to be kept on the third-party network?
Answers
The option that will allow all data to be kept on the third-party network is: D. Full data outsourcing.
Full data outsourcing refers to the practice of entrusting all data storage and management responsibilities to a third-party service provider, typically through cloud computing. In this model, the company's data is stored and processed on the infrastructure provided by the third-party vendor. The company no longer maintains its own physical servers or data centers but relies on the expertise and infrastructure of the service provider.
By opting for full data outsourcing, the company can offload the risks and costs associated with data storage to the third-party vendor. However, it is crucial for the security team to thoroughly evaluate the vendor's security measures, protocols, and compliance standards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the company's data in the cloud environment.
To learn more about data outsourcing, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30168201
#SPJ11
In order to offload the risks of data storage to a third party, the security team has been asked to provide recommendations for implementing a cloud model that allows all data to be kept on the third-party network.
The solution that meets this requirement is to utilize a public cloud service, where the company's data is stored and managed entirely by the third-party provider.
To keep all data on the third-party network and effectively offload the risks of data storage, the company can opt for a public cloud model. Public cloud services are provided by third-party vendors who manage and maintain the infrastructure, including data storage, on their network.
By leveraging a public cloud service, the company's legal and accounting teams can ensure that the responsibility for data storage lies with the third-party provider, making it more cost-effective and reducing the risks associated with in-house data storage.
In a public cloud model, the company's data is stored on the third-party's network infrastructure, which is accessible via the internet. The third-party provider handles the storage, security, and maintenance of the data, allowing the company's IT management team to focus on other core business operations.
This approach provides scalability, flexibility, and cost savings, as the company can scale up or down its storage needs based on demand and pay for only the resources used.
However, it is important for the security team to work closely with the third-party provider to ensure appropriate security measures, data encryption, access controls, and compliance with data protection regulations to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the company's data stored on the third-party network.
Learn more about confidentiality here :
https://brainly.com/question/29504467
#SPJ11
Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
Answers
Answer:
It is only accurate if the criminal is already in the police database.
Explanation:
The print is matched with a fingerprint that is already in the system.
No one disputes that fingerprinting is a valuable and generally reliable police tool, but despite more than a century of use, fingerprinting has never been scientifically validated. This is significant because of the criteria governing the admission of scientific evidence in the US courts. Latent fingerprints, which are collected from crime scenes, have been used as courtroom evidence for decades. ... But there is little certainty that a set of fingerprints can reliably point to the right person, according to the report.
How could U.S. national interests lead to potential conflicts with other countries?
Answers
Answer: This relates to the idea of realism
Explanation:
Less trade deals= economic conflict
Less foreign aid=politcal conflict
Less international work equals cold relationships with other countries could damage vital relationships especially with those the U.S. needs for resources such as Saudi Arabia for oil.
an uncle who owned a large tract of wooded land in fee simple had always opened his land to hunters from the local hunting club, and had often expressed the wish that they be permitted to continue to use it after he died. on his 75th birthday, he conveyed the land to his niece and nephew, who were members of the hunting club. the deed was a general warranty deed conveying the property in fee simple absolute. a few days later, the niece had a serious dispute with the nephew and the other members of the hunting club, and she quit the club. the uncle then executed a written agreement with the nephew stating that the conveyance of the land to the niece and nephew was in trust for the benefit of the local hunting club for a period of 10 years, with the niece and nephew as trustees, and then to the niece and nephew in fee simple. several months later, the uncle died. when the next hunting season drew near, the nephew told the niece that members of the hunting club were once again planning to hunt on the property. the niece threatened to have anyone hunting on the property other than the nephew arrested for trespassing. the nephew brought an action for appropriate legal or equitable relief to establish his rights and the rights of the hunting club. what, if any, relief should the court provide?
Answers
The relief should the court provide is partition the land into two separate tracts so that the nephew may permit the hunting club to use his half.
A court is a person natural or legal charged with adjudicating conflicts between parties and upholding the law in civil, criminal, and administrative cases.
In both common and civil law systems, courts serve as the principal conflict resolution tool, and it is frequently believed that anybody can file a lawsuit. Similar to this, persons charged with crimes have the chance to defend themselves in court. In addition, the presiding official or authorities, typically one or more judges, are referred to as "the court."
To know more about Court here-
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
An item that is releasing a mix of particulates and aerosols as well as gases is referred to as:
Answers
Answer:
Off-Aggregating
Explanation:
I have not been selected for a diversity visa twice and now I’m planning to apply for a student visa in Australia. Can I apply? If so, what are the chances of getting a visa?
Answers
you can apply for a diversity visa as many times as you want, i think the same goes for student visas, the probability of you getting a student visa is based on your financial stability and the most common reason student visas are rejected is that the government deems you incapable of paying the funds necessary to go to school there, hope it helped and good luck
Which crime is BEST represented by the following situation? Dagan sneaks into an event center through an unlocked window to steal valuable items on display for an event the next day.
Answers
Answer:
Theft
Explanation:
an inmate’s assimilation into the prison culture is known as
Answers
An inmate's assimilation into the prison culture is known as prisonization.What is prisonization?Prisonization is a process in which prisoners conform to the prison culture and the subculture within the prison environment.
It means that inmates become accustomed to the social norms and values that exist within the prison walls.The socialization of prisoners into the prison subculture can have both positive and negative effects. On the one hand, it helps inmates to adapt to the environment and cope with the stress of confinement. On the other hand, it can lead to the development of criminal attitudes and behaviors that make it difficult for inmates to reintegrate into society upon release.
To know more about Prisonization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31455729
#SPJ11
Whose job is it to protect the judge and others in the courtroom?
a) Police Officers
b) Bailiffs
c) Sheriffs
d) Special Agents
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
what is criminology?
Answers
Explanation:
Criminology is the scientific study of crime from a social view, it includes its causes and methods of prevention.
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
Criminology is a study learning about crimes and deviant behaviour including how and why crimes occur and also ways to control and prevent criminal actions.
hope this helps,have a great day!!
~Pinky~
2. lionel is negligently driving an automobile at excessive speed. reginald's negligently driven car crosses the center line of the highway and scrapes the side of lionel's car, damaging its fenders. as a result, lionel loses control of his car, which goes into the ditch, where lionel's car is wrecked and lionel suffers personal injuries. what, if anything, can lionel recover?
Answers
Lionel may be able to recover damages for the damage to his car's fenders caused by Reginald's negligence. However, since Lionel was also negligently driving at excessive speed, he may be partially at fault for the accident.
How's the legal concept of comparative negligence?In such cases, the legal concept of comparative negligence comes into play. This means that the total damages awarded to Lionel could be reduced based on the proportion of his fault in the accident.
For example, if a court determines that Lionel was 30% at fault for the accident and Reginald was 70% at fault, Lionel's recovery might be limited to 70% of the total damages.
This could include the cost of repairing his car's fenders, as well as any medical expenses and lost wages resulting from his personal injuries. However, the specific recovery Lionel can obtain depends on the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where the accident occurred.
Some jurisdictions may apply a contributory negligence rule, which could prevent Lionel from recovering any damages if he is found to be even partially at fault. It's important to consult with a legal professional for specific advice in such cases.
Learn more about negligence at
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ11
What does the term posterity mean
Answers
Answer: D all future generations
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is D.
Explanation:
i hope this helps. Dont now how to explain it but know this is the correct answer.
I will give the BRAINIEST
Do you think that the United States should have life imprisonment without parole for children? Explain. How does the speaker feel about this issue?
Answers
No I don't think the United States should have life imprisonment without parole for children. ... otherwise you're basically throwing away their life before they've had a chance to live it. The speaker is greatly against this issue and I agree with him.
QUESTION 7
Firefox is alan ..
1. Search engine
2. Online catalogue
3. Web browser
4. World wide web site
14
Answers
Answer:
Firefox is a web browser
Firefox is of course a web browser there is a difference between search engine and web browser.
Statutes and regulations are interpreted and enforced by courts of law applying common law principles to resolve disputes.
True False
QUESTION 2 1. The executive branch of governments is granted rule making authority statutorily which, when said rules are adopted, are called statutes. True False
QUESTION 3 1. When regulations seek to "clarify" statutes the details are at times invalidated by courts because they meet the letter and intent of the statute.
True False
QUESTION 4 1. Zoning laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction therefore critically impacting construction projects.
True False
QUESTION 5 1. A no-fault adjudication is called strict liability.
True False
QUESTION 6 1. A legal contract is formed when, and only when, an offer is presented and consideration is exchanged.
True False
Answers
"The executive branch of governments is granted rule making authority statutorily which, when said rules are adopted, are called statutes" is False.
The Executive Branch of the government is assigned with the power to enforce laws, not create them. The Executive Branch is responsible for putting the laws into effect and executing the decisions made by the Legislative and Judicial branches of the government, as well as, overseeing the nation's daily activities.
The Executive Branch is not granted rule making authority statutorily. The branch of government which is authorized to create laws or statutes is the Legislative Branch. Hence, the given statement is false.
Learn more about enforce laws
https://brainly.com/question/27896350
#SPJ11
Edward Hanousek worked for Pacific and Arctic Railway and Navigation Company (P&A) as a roadmaster of the White Pass & Yukon Railroad in Alaska. Hanousek was responsible "for every detail of the safe and efficient maintenance and construction of track, structures and marine facilities of the entire railroad," including special projects. One project was a rock quarry, known as "6-mile," above the Skagway River. Next to the quarry, and just beneath the surface, ran a high-pressure oil pipeline owned by Pacific and Arctic Pipeline, Inc. P&A's sister company. When the quarry's backhoe operator punctured the pipeline, an estimated 1,000-5,000 gallons of oil were discharged into the river. Hanousek was charged with negligently discharging a harmful quantity of oil into a navigable water of the United States in violation of the criminal provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.
1. Did Hanousek have the required mental state (mens rea) to be convicted of a crime? Why or why not?
2. Which theory discussed in the chapter would enable a court to hold Hanousek criminally liable for violating the statute regardless of whether he participated in, directed, or even knew about the specific violation?
3. Could the backhoe operator who punctured the pipeline also be charged with a crime in this situation? Explain.
4. Suppose that at trial, Hanousek argued that he should not be convicted because he was not aware of the requirements of the SWA. Would this defense be successful? Why or why not?
Answers
1. In order to be convicted of a crime, Hanousek must have had the required mental state (mens rea).
2. The theory of strict liability, discussed in the chapter, would enable a court to hold Hanousek criminally liable for violating the statute regardless of his knowledge or participation in the specific violation.
3. The backhoe operator who punctured the pipeline could also potentially be charged with a crime in this situation.
4. Hanousek's defense that he was not aware of the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) would likely not be successful.
1. The chapter does not provide specific information regarding Hanousek's mental state or intent in relation to the oil discharge. It would depend on the evidence presented in the case to determine whether he had the necessary mental state, such as whether he acted knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence.
2. Strict liability offenses impose liability without requiring proof of intent or knowledge. If the statute under the Clean Water Act imposes strict liability for the discharge of oil into navigable waters, Hanousek could be held criminally liable even if he was not directly involved or aware of the pipeline puncture.
3. If the operator acted negligently or recklessly, causing the oil discharge into the river, they could be held responsible for violating the criminal provisions of the Clean Water Act. However, it would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence of the operator's actions and mental state.
4. Ignorance of the law is generally not a valid defense in criminal cases. The CWA is a federal statute with established regulations, and individuals are expected to be aware of their legal obligations. Hanousek's lack of awareness of the CWA's requirements would not absolve him of potential liability unless there were specific circumstances or legal arguments that could support a defense based on lack of knowledge or mistake of law, which would require further analysis of the case specifics.
Learn more about Negligence
https://brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
What is generally true regarding insured who have have been giving classified as preferred risks
Answers
The House of Representatives impeached the President. During the Senate debate before the
beginning of the impeachment trial phase, a parliamentary rule was offered that requested that
the vote on whether to find the President guilty should be made by secret ballot, rather than by
roll call. A majority of the senators voted in favor of this rule. The President filed a complaint
with a federal district court judge seeking an injunction against the use of a secret ballot on the
ground that such a practice violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The
Senate majority leader (on behalf of all named parties defendant) filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint. How should the district court rule on the motion?
Answers
Answer:
The district court should deny the motion to dismiss the complaint. The President's complaint seeking an injunction against the use of a secret ballot in the impeachment trial is a valid legal claim. The argument that a secret ballot violates the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment raises a constitutional issue that merits consideration by the court.
The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of an accused person to confront the witnesses against them. In this case, the use of a secret ballot could potentially impact the President's ability to confront the senators who vote against him. By not knowing the identity of those who cast their votes, the President may be deprived of the opportunity to challenge their credibility or question their motives during the trial.
Given the importance of the constitutional issue raised and the potential impact on the President's rights, the district court should allow the case to proceed and conduct a thorough examination of the arguments presented by both parties. It is within the court's jurisdiction to determine whether the use of a secret ballot in the impeachment trial violates the Confrontation Clause, and such a decision should not be dismissed without proper consideration.
Explanation:
Which amendment is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reporductive choice
Answers
The amendment that is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reproductive choice is the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, contains several provisions that have been central to modern debates on affirmative action and reproductive choice. Specifically, two clauses within the amendment are frequently referenced in these contexts: the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause.
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause has been instrumental in cases involving affirmative action, where individuals or groups challenge government policies that use race or ethnicity as a factor in promoting diversity or remedying past discrimination.
The Supreme Court has ruled that any governmental use of race must meet a strict scrutiny standard, meaning it must serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
This clause has been the basis for protecting an individual's right to privacy, which has been cited in cases involving reproductive choice. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) established that a woman has a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion under the Due Process Clause.
know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29517519
#SPJ11
What area of law involves advising officers in charge of creating relationships with businesses? A.) civil B.) commercial C.) employment D.) labor
Answers
Answer:
B.) commercial
Explanation:
Commercial law is also called mercantile or trade law. It governs how a business transactions are made and is mostly concerned with contract and tort law.
Officers that create relationships with businesses in order to go into trade or a contract are advised on the basis of commercial law.
The main aim is creation of a reasonable environment in which trade can thrive and parties involved are treated fairly.
I need an annotated bibliography about crime
Answers
I hope this helps! If it doesnt then just look it up on google i guess lol
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
The four key elements of negligence are duty of care, breach of the duty of care, causation, and _____.
-warrantless search
-damages
-property
-allowance
Answers
Answer: Damages
Explanation:
The fourth key element of negligence is damages. It is an element of negligence that can include financial compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost wages, and property loss.
What is negligence?The most usual definition of negligence is that it is conduct, or a failure to act, that breaches a duty to take care. It breaks down into several elements, all of which must exist to give rise to a liability to pay compensation. There must be a duty owed.
It is a situation in which a person acts in a careless manner, which results in someone else getting hurt or property being damaged.
Learn more about negligence here,
https://brainly.com/question/12177947
#SPJ2
Which option best completes the diagram:Major principles of the English Bill of Rights --> Freedom to petition the gov., .........., Right to a fair trial
Answers
Freedom to address a ruler. freedom from unusually harsh or abusive treatment. a lack of taxation. The main tenets of the Bill of Rights are the freedom from penalties & forfeitures without a trial. Therefore, choice B is the best one.
A law known as that of the English Bill of Rights was approved by the English Parliament on December 16, 1689. It led to the division of several powers, restricted the authority of the monarch and queen, improved democratic election processes, and increased citizens' freedom of speech.
An statute known as the Bill of Rights established the constitutional monarchy of England. The three main tenets of free speech, frequent parliaments, & free elections inside Parliament were created by the legislation. In essence, the Bill of Rights strengthens and defends citizens' rights.
Question: Which option best completes the diagram?
Major principles of the English Bill of Rights, Freedom to petition the government Right to a fair trial
A. Freedom for citizens to pay taxes as they please
B. Free speech for all citizens
C. Freedom from quartering soldiers
D. Protection from cruel punishments
To know more about Bill of Rights:
brainly.com/question/16179148
#SPJ4
the federal government's biggest single source of revenue is from
Answers
The federal government's biggest single source of revenue is from the individual income tax.
The Internal Revenue Service collects money from every individual who earns an income, which includes wages, salaries, bonuses, tips, and other forms of compensation. The amount of tax owed is calculated based on the individual's taxable income, which is the difference between their gross income and any deductions they may be eligible for. The tax rate is progressive, meaning that individuals who earn more money pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than those who earn less.
In addition to individual income tax, the federal government also collects revenue from corporate income tax, social insurance taxes (including Social Security and Medicare), excise taxes on goods such as alcohol and tobacco, and various fees and tariffs. However, individual income tax remains the largest source of revenue, accounting for over 50% of the federal government's total revenue.
The revenue generated from individual income tax is used to fund a variety of federal programs, including national defense, healthcare, education, infrastructure, and social welfare programs. In recent years, there has been much debate over the appropriate level of taxation, with some arguing that taxes should be lowered to stimulate economic growth, and others advocating for higher taxes to fund increased government spending.
Regardless of the outcome of these debates, it is clear that individual income tax will remain the federal government's largest source of revenue for the foreseeable future.
For more such questions on federal government
https://brainly.com/question/31134219
#SPJ4
The statement below is from a jury's decision in a court case.
"We, the jury, rule in favor of Mrs. Garcia, and order Mr. Wakefield to pay the sum of twenty thousand dollars, plus attorney fees and court costs.."
Based on the statement above, what type of case has the jury decided?
A. civil
B. criminal
C. military
D. statutory
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The kind of case that the jury has decided would be:
A). Civil
What are the types of cases?The courts deal with a number of cases which include:
Civil CasesFamily CasesCriminal casesAs per the details provided, the given case would be characterized as a Civil Case as it is concerned with the conflicts that exist between Mrs. Garcia and Mr. Wakefield.
The decision of the court would aim to resolve this and hence, it exemplifies a civil case.
Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about "Jury" here:
brainly.com/question/20407684
it is to get behind the wheel with out thinking
Answers
Answer:
Highway hypnosis is the condition of when you drive/get behind the wheel without thinking or having proper consciousness.
Explanation:
Does this video give you a better understanding of how individuals become involved in radical jihad? What are some ways we can help other countries prevent the radicalization of youth and young individuals?
Answers
The essential point of as fighting isn't the change of but instead the development and guard of the state. Just a single source has alluded to the more extensive target of the development that 'saw the horrible condition of the in the subcontinent.
Who were The Youngsters?Youngsters who are in danger of might have low confidence, or be casualties.
Such could target them and let them know they can be essential for something particularly amazing, later conditioning them into removing themselves from their ones.
Anybody can be , yet factors, for example, being effectively impacted and make kids and youngsters especially. Youngsters who are in danger of might have low confidence or be survivors of or separation.
Therefore he began a development to lay out the public authority of by and by, which they had lost after the Realm.
Learn more about Youngsters here:
brainly.com/question/6401353
#SPJ1
What is a word processor? A. Searches the Internet for documents that contain a key phrase that the user enters B. Organizes and categorizes information in a way that it can be accessed easily C. Stores changes, and formats text typed using a keyboard; text can be saved into a computer document and printed D. Distributes information electronically from one computer user to one or more recipients through a network
Answers
What is a word processor?
A. Searches the Internet for documents that contain a key phrase that the user enters
B. Organizes and categorizes information in a way that it can be accessed easily
C. Stores changes, and formats text typed using a keyboard; text can be saved into a computer document and printed
D. Distributes information electronically from one computer user to one or more recipients through a networkRead Shelly v Kraeme, Moose Lodge v. Irvis and Georgia v. Mccollum.
Which case is most compelling?
Answers
Answer:
Georgia v. Mccollum.
Explanation: