The statement here 'China's civilizations developed around rivers. The earliest settlements grew and spread on land surrounding the Huang He River. This river and other geographical features played a key role in shaping China's civilizations.' is true.
China is a large country with a diverse range of geographical features. The northwest and northeastern regions are desert-covered. West of China, the massive Himalayan mountain range forms its border. A large portion of eastern China is a fertile area with rivers, plains, and coastal regions. Let's examine more closely how these physical characteristics affected the emergence of early Chinese civilizations. Major rivers in China include the Yangtze and the Huang He. Both rivers played a role in the rise of civilization in China. The Huang He, which also goes by the name "Yellow River" due to the silt's yellow hue, rises in western China and flows 3,395 miles to the east.
Know more about "China's civilizations" visit
brainly.com/question/1852076
#SPJ4
If God wants us to be happy for who we are then can't we just be happy for us being LGBTQ+
Answer:
because god did not create us to be lgbtq he created man and women. and for them to go together only but god still loves you if you are lgbtq it is a sin but so is lying ive lied and so have you we are the same no matter the sin its simple love the sinner not the sin god loves no matter what you are whether you support trump or biden it doesnt matter he loves us all the same:)
Explanation:
Answer:
im pansexual so like and i agree lgbtq people and everyone else is perfect in gods eyes
Explanation:
The two major political parties are most interested in
Answer:
I don't understand your question but I tried my best.
Explanation:
American electoral politics have been dominated by two major political parties since shortly after the founding of the republic of the United States of America. Since the 1850s, they have been the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
Who is usually the first person to bring to the court’s attention a relapse by an offender? i need to know asap!!!
Answer:
hope this helps
Explanation:
Probation Officer
there are times when agreements are so one-sided, or heavy-handed against one party, that courts will not make the harmed, innocent person fulfill his or her contractual duties. these heavily one-sided agreements are known as agreements.
Agreements which are one-sided, or heavy-handed against one party, that courts will not make the harmed, innocent person fulfill his or her contractual duties are unconscionable agreements/contracts.
Unconscionable contracts are those that are so blatantly biased against one party and unfair to the other that the law deems them to be unenforceable. In terms of contract law, an unconscionable contract is one which gives either of the parties no real, huge range. This is usually the result of major disparities in the parties' relative bargaining positions. Unconscionable contracts frequently entail one of the parties signing under pressure, with imperfect data, or after being deceived, which is one of their main characteristics.
A contract will normally be deemed unenforceable if a lawsuit is brought and the court decides that it is unconscionable.
Learn more about unconscionable contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/14426554
#SPJ4
Discuss how reserve officers could be a benefit to investigative work.
Answer:
Brainliest please
Explanation:
For police departments that decide to use reserve officers, the added help can condense full- time police officers but also pose arrears. The key is to minimize the pitfalls and duly manage the reserves.
State law extends the authority to use reserve officers to cosmopolises. All of theS.C. Criminal Justice Academy's Reserve Officer Program Norms must first be met.
A reserve police officer is an overdue levy who assists a law enforcement agency in administering the law. The agency head, with the blessing of the governing body or its principal operating officer, appoints reserve officers. Just like their full- time counterparts, reserve officers are concentrated on the weal of the people, the protection of property in their community, and the just and indifferent enforcement of the law.
since the sherman act was passed, what has been the general trend in the u.s. regarding antitrust legislation
The trend in the U.S. regarding antitrust legislation has been one of increasing regulation and enforcement to protect competition and consumers, with recent attention on the tech industry.
Since the passage of the Sherman Act in 1890, the general trend in the U.S. regarding antitrust legislation has been one of increasing regulation and enforcement. The Sherman Act was followed by the Clayton Act in 1914, which further strengthened antitrust laws by prohibiting specific types of anticompetitive practices such as price discrimination and tying arrangements.
In the 20th century, antitrust enforcement became a key feature of U.S. economic policy. The 1930s saw the creation of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, which was given the responsibility of enforcing antitrust laws. In the 1960s, Congress passed the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, which required companies to notify the government of any large mergers or acquisitions.
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in antitrust enforcement as concerns have grown about the concentration of market power in the hands of a few large tech companies. In 2020, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against GG alleging antitrust violations, and there have been calls for increased antitrust scrutiny of other tech giants such as FB and Amz.
To learn more about antitrust legislation
https://brainly.com/question/25610822
#SPJ4
An undergraduate course required for graduation has a reputation for being extremely
hard to pass, much harder than similar courses. When posting materials to the class
website, the teacher accidently posts a test with answers indicated at the end. The
teacher notices the error immediately and deletes the test, but before she does so a
student downloads the test. The website does not allow the teacher to see whether the
test was downloaded, and because she deleted the test with the answers so quickly, the
teacher later uploaded the same test without the answers and required students to take
the test. The Student Code of Ethics prohibits students from taking a test when there is
reason for them to believe they have confidential information regarding the answers to a
test they are not supposed to have. Violations of the Student Code of Ethics are
punishable.
Questions
What are the issues of integrity, ethics and law posed in the case study? What
options do the teacher and the student have, and what should they do and why?
The issue of integrity posed in the case study is that the student have seen the answers to the questions and the right thing to do is to report the issue to the right authority.
The issues of ethics posed in the case study is that students have to do the right thing and not violate of the Student Code.The issues of law posed in the case study is that students who have Violated the Student Code of Ethics are punishable and as such student should do the right thing.The other options the teacher have is to set new questions and other option the student have is to report the case before the examination date.What are ethics?The word ethic is also known as moral philosophy. It is one that is concerned with any situation or scenario that is morally good and bad.
Learn more about Ethics from
https://brainly.com/question/13969108
taylor sued the giants for the allegedly negligent warm-up throw. the most likely outcome of this case is:
The most likely outcome of Taylor suing the Giants for the allegedly negligent warm-up throw is that the case will be dismissed.
In the scenario given, Taylor is suing the Giants for a warm-up throw that was allegedly negligently made. There are a few issues with the case, such as: If the throw was a warm-up throw, then it is unlikely to have been aimed at Taylor directly.
As such, it is difficult to prove that the Giants were negligent in their actions. If the Giants were negligent in their actions, it would be difficult to prove that the alleged negligence was the direct cause of Taylor's injury. Taylor would need to prove that the injury would not have occurred if the Giants had not been negligent, which is difficult to prove.
If the case does go to trial, the Giants would likely argue that Taylor assumed the risk of injury by attending the game in the first place. This is a common defense used in sports injury cases where the injured party knew or should have known that there was a risk of injury but participated in the activity anyway.
Based on these issues, it is most likely that the case will be dismissed. The burden of proof in personal injury cases is high, and it is difficult to prove that the Giants were negligent and that their negligence was the direct cause of Taylor's injury.
To know more about allegedly negligent refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30258088#
#SPJ11
write a paragraph on your opinion of the correctional system. Do you feel it should be altered or changed?
Answer:
I think it should stay it is as good as it seem
I'm new here by the way
Provide two examples of real-life instances where you engaged in an error in reasoning and, as a result, came to a faulty conclusion about something that you observed.
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
What is a Faulty Conclusion?
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
https://brainly.com/question/2141635
The Constitution grants the federal government several financial, which include the_____, ____, and___. Even though federal government is given certain powers, its power is limited by the____and____. These amendments prohibit the national government from depriving any person of____, ____, or without due process of____.
Answer:
Powers; spending power; banking power; taxing power; fifth amendment; fourteenth amendment; liberty; life; property; law.
Explanation:
A constitution refers to a set of written laws and principles which is typically used to determine the power and authority of the government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights of its citizens. In the United States of America, the federal government has various powers granted by Acts of Congress and Article II of the U.S constitution such as Ordinance power, Appointment power, Implied power, Executive power, Financial power etc.
Hence, the Constitution grants the federal government several financial powers, which include the spending power, banking power, and taxing power. Even though federal government is given certain powers, its power is limited by the fifth amendment and fourteenth amendment. These amendments prohibit the national government from depriving any person of liberty, life, or property without due process of law.
The 5th and 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and they address the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.
Finley wants to make as many people happy as possible. He steals from a greedy ceo in order to give money to a large number of peiple. Which philosophy of ethics is applicable. Social justice virtue kantianism utilitRanism
Answer:
Utilitarianism.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a term or philosophy of ethics that describes the belief or view that, an action is considered morally right if it resulted in goodness, more pleasure, or happiness than bad, pain, or unhappiness.
Hence, in this case, Finley believes, stealing in itself is neither bad nor good; what renders it bad or good is the effects it generates. Thus, stealing from a greedy CEO, whom he believes has less need for the money, and gives the money to a large number of people whom he thinks to need money can be justified based on the calculation that the benefits of the theft outweigh the losses caused by the theft.
Therefore, the right answer is UTILITARIANISM
Human actions that violate the formalized laws of a country are known as what?
Answer:
What is Crime? Crime is defined as human actions that violate the formalized laws of a country, state, or local area like a city or township.
Answer: A. Crime
Explanation:
Thief catchers were hired during the
crime wave in England during the 18th
and 19th centuries and were identified
as:
Answer: "Social climbers" and "rent a cops".
Also, Use Quizlet for these questions. They have tons of answers!
why is it difficult for any single special interest group to dominate state politics? group of answer choices the structure of the texas government itself the shifting demographics of the state the large number of elected individuals the regulations on group campaign contributions the lack of media attention to group activities
There are multiple reasons why it is difficult for any single special interest group to dominate state politics.
Some of these reasons include:
1. The structure of the state government: State governments are designed with a system of checks and balances, which includes multiple branches and levels of government. This distribution of power limits the ability of any single group to exert control over the entire political system.
2. Shifting demographics: States often have diverse and changing demographics, with different interest groups and populations having varying priorities and interests. This diversity makes it challenging for any single group to appeal to and represent the entire electorate.
3. Large number of elected individuals: State politics involve a significant number of elected officials, including legislators, governors, and other executive positions. This multitude of decision-makers makes it difficult for any one group to control the majority of seats or offices.
4. Regulations on campaign contributions: Many states have regulations in place that limit the influence of money in politics and restrict the amount and source of campaign contributions. These regulations aim to prevent undue influence by special interest groups.
5. Media attention: The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and highlighting political activities. If there is a lack of media attention or coverage on specific group activities, it becomes harder for that group to dominate state politics and gain widespread support.
It is important to note that these factors can vary from state to state and may not apply universally.
To learn more about politics refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14614365#
#SPJ11
in the following situations, which source of law takes priority, and why? the state statute conflicts with the common law of that state. a federal statute conflicts with the us constitution. a common-law decision in one state conflicts with the us constitution. a federal statute conflicts with a state constitution
State statute takes priority over common law in the situation where a state statute conflicts with the common law of that state. This is because statutes are enacted by the legislative branch of the government and represent the current policy choices made by the state lawmakers.
In the United States, the US Constitution takes priority over a federal statute if there is a conflict between the two. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and serves as the foundation for the entire legal system. Any federal statute that contradicts the Constitution would be considered unconstitutional and therefore invalid.
When a common-law decision in one state conflicts with the US Constitution, the Constitution prevails. As the supreme law of the land, the Constitution sets the framework for the entire country, and any state law or decision that goes against its provisions would be deemed unconstitutional and unenforceable.
In the case of a federal statute conflicting with a state constitution, the federal statute generally takes precedence. This is due to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, which establishes that federal law is supreme over state law when there is a conflict. However, there may be instances where the courts find the federal statute unconstitutional under the state constitution, leading to a different outcome.
To know more about US Constitution
brainly.com/question/32869853
#SPJ11
Which Act allows a new state to join the country?
Prinz v US Analyze Prinz v United States (1997), discussing the overarching issue, how the case arose, the Supreme Court's decision, and the rationale for that decision. Please include whether you agree with SCOTUS, and why?
1) This case arose as a result of Printz's main argument, which was that the federal government could not compel state and local governments to carry out federal policy for the following reasons: The Tenth Amendment for the Constitution strengthens the concept of a limited federal government and protects states from such mandates.
2) In Printz v. United States, the United States Supreme Court decided the case in 1997. The Court agreed with Printz and Mack and declared the mandatory background check provisions unconstitutional. Writing for the case's 5-4 majority. "The federal government might neither issue directives requiring the states to address specific problems, nor command the officers of the states, or those of their political subdivisions, to manage or enforce a federal regulatory scheme," Justice Antonin Scalia concluded. 3) The Printz decision reaffirmed the Court's 1992 decision in New York v. United States, in which the Court invalidated provisions of a federal statute governing nuclear waste policy for violating state sovereignty in violation of the Tenth Amendment.
4) According to the Federalism Five, there are fixed boundaries between federal and state and local powers, and the Court must be willing to define and enforce those boundaries. 5) These and other cases have sparked heated debates among scholars and commentators about the Court's proper role in defining the scope of federal powers.
6) In issuing this wave of federalism decisions and resurrecting doctrines long thought to be buried in a judicial graveyard, the Rehnquist Court has been dubbed a "federalism revolution," though others argue that the Court's decisions in this area are far from revolutionary. 7) In conclusion, the Court's interpretations of the Tenth Amendment and other constitutional federalism provisions suggest that there are legal limits to federal power, and in doing so, the Court appears to have strengthened state and local sovereignty.
Learn more about Printz, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30830002
#SPJ4
an identification procedure that involves only the suspect and the victim is called a/an
An identification procedure that involves only the suspect and the victim is called a "show-up."
A show-up is a police identification procedure in which a suspect is presented to a victim or witness, usually shortly after the crime occurred, to determine whether the suspect is the person who committed the crime. This type of identification procedure is often used when the police have a strong lead on a suspect and want to quickly confirm or eliminate them as a suspect. However, show-ups have been criticized for their potential to be suggestive and to result in false identifications, as the witness is only presented with one person to identify. As such, other identification procedures such as lineups and photo arrays are typically preferred.
To learn more about identification procedure, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30190116
#SPJ11
2. CHAPTER 6 (5 points)
Should soldiers in the military be prosecuted for the killing or torturing of enemies captured
in war? Include comments on the William Calley and Abu Ghraib cases in your response.
ANSWER:
Lt. William L. Calley was found guilty of premediated murder at My Lai by U.S. Army
Answer:
courts martial in 1971, following his involvement in the killing of hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese civilians, including women and children, during the Vietnam War. The atrocities committed by Calley and his platoon were a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit the targeting of non-combatants in war. Similarly, the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq in 2004 brought to light the brutal and inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners by U.S. military personnel. The photographs and videos that emerged from the prison showed detainees being subjected to physical and sexual abuse, torture, and humiliation. The actions of the soldiers involved in the Abu Ghraib scandal were a clear violation of international law and human rights. In both cases, the soldiers involved were prosecuted and faced punishment for their actions. The question of whether soldiers in the military should be prosecuted for killing or torturing enemies captured
Is it illegal to murder someone
Answer:
No it depends on how you do it self defense its legal just to do it its illegal
Explanation:
does chase freedom unlimited have foreign transaction fees?
Answer:
Explanation:
No, Chase Freedom Unlimited does not have foreign transaction fees. This means that you can use your card for purchases outside the United States without incurring any additional fees. However, keep in mind that foreign merchants may charge a fee for using a credit card, which is separate from any fees charged by the card issuer. It is always a good idea to check with the merchant and your credit card issuer about any fees before making a purchase.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
ECONOMICS
Part II: Application and Critical Thinking (20 points)
6. The United States is a highly developed nation with the highest GDP in the world, one of the highest
per capita incomes in the world, and a high standard of living. Write a short essay that describes the
following:
a. Three factors that led to U.S. economic expansion and growth during the 20th century
b. Some of the challenges the United States still faces with its standard of living, despite its
new global standing
Then, write an analysis paragraph in which you identify which of these challenges facing the U.S.
standard of living, in your opinion, most needs to be addressed, and why. (20 points)
The factors that led to the U.S economic expansion are technological advancement, industrialization and education.
What factors that led to the U.S economic expansion and growth during 20th century?a. Three factors that led to U.S. economic expansion and growth during the 20th century are:
1. Technological advancements - The United States made significant progress in technology during the 20th century, such as the development of the internet and the computer, which revolutionized the way people live and work.
2. Industrialization - The U.S. was heavily industrialized during the 20th century, which led to the growth of the manufacturing sector, creating more job opportunities and contributing to economic expansion.
3. Education and innovation - The United States has one of the best education systems in the world, which fosters innovation and creativity, leading to the development of new products, services, and industries.
b. Despite its new global standing, the United States still faces several challenges with its standard of living, including income inequality, healthcare access, and climate change.
In my opinion, income inequality is the most significant challenge facing the U.S. standard of living because it impacts a wide range of issues such as education, health, and poverty. The wealth gap in the U.S. is increasing, with the top 1% owning more wealth than the bottom 90%. This inequality affects not only those in poverty but also the middle class, which is essential to the economy. Without addressing this issue, the U.S. risks losing its status as a global leader, as well as exacerbating social and political tensions. The government needs to implement policies that ensure equal access to education, job opportunities, and fair wages to address this issue.
Learn more on U.S economic expansion here;
https://brainly.com/question/12148347
#SPJ1
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Simple methods are sometimes used to remember the meaning of ethics in everyday decisions. Which of the following is an example of such a method?
Sometimes, straightforward techniques are employed to recall the significance of ethics in daily decisions. The following is an illustration of such a technique: E-T-H-I-C-S.
According to Wikipedia, the study of ethics, also referred to as moral philosophy, "involves systematizing, defending, and approving concepts of good and wrong behaviour." The fields of ethics and aesthetics together up the subfield of philosophy known as axiology. Value-related concerns are addressed in these fields. Ethics seeks to address questions concerning human morality by defining concepts like good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime. Value theory, descriptive ethics, and moral psychology are academic fields of study that are connected to moral philosophy. The top three recognised areas of ethics research now are as follows: the study of meta-ethics, which focuses on the theoretical foundation and relevance of moral assertions and how to judge the accuracy of those claims.
Learn more about ethics from
brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ4
what is 2 + 5,940,714
Answer:
5,940,716
Explanation:
that is what it is
Answer:
5940716
Explanation:
12. the revised uniform partnership act mandates that with regard to partnership debts and liabilities, general partners are:
Under the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA), general partners are jointly and severally liable for partnership debts and liabilities.
This means that each general partner is individually responsible for the entirety of the partnership's debts and obligations. If the partnership cannot fulfill its financial obligations, creditors can pursue any or all of the general partners for repayment.
The joint and several liability provision of RUPA emphasizes the personal responsibility of general partners for partnership debts. It allows creditors to seek satisfaction from any individual partner's personal assets, even if other partners are unable to contribute their share. This provision provides a greater level of security for creditors, ensuring they have recourse to the personal assets of any general partner to satisfy outstanding debts.
It's important for general partners to understand the implications of joint and several liability and consider potential risks before entering into a partnership. In some cases, partners may choose to limit their liability by forming a limited liability partnership (LLP) or a limited partnership (LP), where certain partners have limited liability based on their contribution or role in the partnership.
Learn more about Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) here
https://brainly.com/question/32474613
#SPJ11
The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of _____.
600 officers
16 sworn officers who split their time between campuses
6 sworn officers and 66 civilian guards
over 60 sworn officers
The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of over 60 sworn officers.
The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has 64 sworn police officers who are joined by 40 full-time civilian department members. Together they try to maintain campus safety through crime prevention and education programs. They are also responsible in maintaining law and order.
The University of California Police Department or UCPD shares a partnership with the CARE. It is Campus Assault Resources and Education program. CARE is a safe place for survivors of sexual assault and help in maintaining discipline in the university. It also promotes safety awareness about recent activities through community outreach programs.
To know more about University of California here
https://brainly.com/question/16551247
#SPJ1
Que es el comunismo en tus propias palabras. AYUDAAAA plz ya casi lo entrego namas falta eso si no sacare 6 noo jajajja
What is the principle that is applied to determine how much compensation a party receives in a quasi-contract settlement?.
The quantum meruit standard is used to calculate each party's share of the compensation in a quasi-contract settlement.
What rule is used to determine how much money each party is awarded in a quasi-contract settlement?Implied contracts are another name for quasi-contracts. The defendant is required to make restitution payments to the plaintiff or the harmed party once they have been mandated. Quantum meruit is the legal term for this payback, which is determined by the amount of money or item worth that the defendant unlawfully gained.
What distinguishes quantum meruit?A plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant consented to the services they were to perform for them and anticipated paying them in order for their quantum meruit claim to succeed. The defendant must also be shown to have been unfairly enriched, which implies that they were given free products or services, according to the plaintiff.
Learn more about quasi-contracts: https://brainly.com/question/4392832
#SPJ4