summarize articles 4-6 of the constitution

Answer:

We all want a cri- justice system that's sensible, effective, and creates a safe society with less cr*me

Explanation:

Answer:

i actually dont think that death penalty should be legal. unless the person killed BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of innocent people or did so many bad things that police and stuff even lost track,i think that anyone should go on death row. (or whatever its called). poeple that go to prison for years still have a chance at life. they have a chance to change and stuff.

i think that a . death penalty for ANYONE is too harsh

thats my opinion :)

Answer:

President

Explanation:

Based on the information provided in this scenario, the best guess would be that John is the President of the country in question. This is because ANY individual that acts on behalf of the government and has been granted special or extraordinary power by the government has the ability to declare a national emergency. Yet the President of the country is usually known as the commander of the armed forces and holds the highest rank when making decisions on attacking another country. Therefore John designation would be as President of the country.

Answer:

- have 20/20 vision

- commissioned officer

The correct option is (C), an effective punishment reduces the likelihood that a behavior will occur in the future.

A person may face legal punishment as judged by a court of law if they break the law by committing a crime or misdemeanor, failing to fulfill a legal obligation, or both. When punishment is used for revenge, incapacitation, or deterrence, it is permissible. The deterrence argument contends that if an offender is punished, both the perpetrator and those who emulate him will be deterred from committing other crimes.

A person learns that a particular action is wrong since it has led to the addition of something unpleasant through positive punishment. Applying positive punishment can help to cut down on undesired behavior. The goal is to create new behaviors that will promote prosperity and improve environmental adaptation in humans.

To learn more about Positive punishment, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13025873

#SPJ4

In addition to the items already stated, a Child Travel Consent Form also known as a Permission to Travel Letter or a Parental Consent to Travel must be required.

Also known as the Transportation release form, the law requires that every child that must go on a field trip must present the parental consent form to their teachers.

The consent form or Field Trip permission slip when signed absolves the school or organization from any liability related to the field drip.

Learn more about how schools require parental consent at the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/14484558

Answer:

Its B and D

Explanation:

The term alternative dispute resolution (ADR) means any procedure, agreed to by the parties of a dispute, in which they use the services of a neutral party to assist them in reaching agreement and avoiding litigation. (litigation means legal action)

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

As the legislation provisions included criminalizing poaching, setting limits on number of fish people can catch etc; the threats that will most likely decrease the most as a result of the legislation is Over-harvesting.

Also known as over-exploitation, is when a renewable resource is harvested to the point of diminishing returns. A continued overexploitation may result in the resource's demise because it will be unable to replenish.

Overexploitation is one of the five major activities threatening global biodiversity. Ecologists use the term to describe populations that are harvested at an unsustainable rate based on their natural rates of mortality and reproductive capacities.

Full Options "A Habitat loss and degradation B Pollution C Overharvesting D Climate and natural disasters

Read more about Over-harvesting

brainly.com/question/9192607

#SPJ1

Answer:

intermediate appellate courts

Trade Act of 1974 granted the president the ability to engage in trade negotiations, Congress limited presidential jurisdiction by requiring a determination that any agreement will not endanger national security and would promote the purposes of the Act.

Answer:

Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates  improves the chances of being released from prison.

Answer: Therefore, assault is defined as an attempt or threat to injure another person, while battery occurs when there is actually harmful or offense contact with another person. Because assault is the threat of harm and battery is the act of harming another person, these two crimes are often charged together. Child abuse is a legal term to define illegal acts towards a child. A criminal act of child abuse may have another name reflective of the type of abuse. Physical child abuse is most often charged as the crime of assault or assault of a child.

Explanation:

I would advise candidate Trump to adopt a more inclusive and empathetic communication style, focusing on unity and collaboration rather than divisive rhetoric.

As candidate Trump's public relations advisor, I would emphasize the importance of building bridges and appealing to a wider audience. I would encourage him to choose his words carefully, avoiding inflammatory language and personal attacks. Instead, I would suggest emphasizing policy positions and highlighting his accomplishments, while also demonstrating empathy and understanding for diverse perspectives.

I would recommend engaging in constructive dialogue, actively listening to concerns, and presenting himself as a unifying force. By modifying his approach to be more inclusive and empathetic, candidate Trump could appeal to a broader range of voters and project a more presidential image.

Learn more about Trump: https://brainly.com/question/29994218

#SPJ11

Answer:

Addressing Congress

Explanation:

I'm going to guess that there are 4 questions.

The President does not appoint senators, they are elected by the people of a state.

The President does not create laws, that is up to the Legislative Branch of Congress.

The President does not fund the military, Congress funds the military.

The answer here is

B. Addressing Congress.

For Fourth Amendment purposes, a person who came to the premises that were searched to buy illegal drugs is least likely to be found to have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched. The correct option is B.

In general, for the Fourth Amendment's protections to be in effect, there must be a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area being searched. The Fourth Amendment shields people from the government's unreasonable searches and seizures.

In this situation, a person who knowingly enters a place with the intent to purchase illegal drugs is acting unlawfully and does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that situation. The other choices involve people who are somehow related to or who own the property which might give them a legitimate expectation of privacy.

Learn more about Fourth Amendment at:

brainly.com/question/7955252

#SPJ4

Answer:

II

Explanation:

All agent are entitled to be paid for their services

Answer:

The law that has been evolved from the decisions made in appellate courts and judicial precedent, is known as common law or sometimes as case law. The common law system gives pre-eminence to the common law, as it considers unfair to treat the same facts in a different manner in different situations.

Arrests made by police, which are the only arrests supported by evidence, are unfair to the innocent. Police officers and government workers could benefit from better training to help prevent these issues.

According to the argument, the risk is decreased when the police detain innocent persons. I think the government should compensate the victim in a defamation case who was unfairly convicted of a crime and forced to serve years of their lives in prison.

These are the unlawful arrests that the police make when they are the only arrests supported by evidence. By improving the training of the police and government employees, the problems can be averted.Police are involved in the claim, which leads to the arrest of an innocent person.

To learn more about government, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ4

Answer:

because god did not create us to be lgbtq he created man and women. and for them to go together only but god still loves you if you are lgbtq it is a sin but so is lying ive lied and so have you we are the same no matter the sin its simple love the sinner not the sin god loves no matter what you are whether you support trump or biden it doesnt matter he loves us all the same:)

Explanation:

Answer:

im pansexual so like and i agree lgbtq people and everyone else is perfect in gods eyes

Explanation:

Answer:

Innocent

Explanation:

If you go into a family disturbance and assume only 1 person guilty and the other completely innocent, there is a chance you could be wrong. The person who claims to be innocent, and you think is innocent could have potentially instigated this crime. Or maybe they could have done something in the past that was a crime against the guilty person, that caused the whole disturbance. So there is always the potential that the case can have fault on both sides.

-Hope this helped.

In many states, most dower and curtesy laws have been replaced by laws that provide for the equal division of property between spouses in the event of divorce or death.

If a child had been born during their marriage, a husband has a title to the assets and possessions of his spouse who passed away known as curtesy. Before, there were distinct privileges for living male and female spouses, but in the majority of states, those distinctions have been eliminated.These laws are often referred to as community property laws or equitable distribution laws. They are designed to ensure that both spouses receive a fair share of the marital property, regardless of who earned it or whose name is on the title.

However, the specifics of these laws can vary depending on the state and the circumstances of the case.

To learn more about Curtesy, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13171779

#SPJ11

In many states, most dower and curtesy laws have been replaced by laws that provide for the equal division of property between spouses in the event of divorce or death.

If a child had been born during their marriage, a husband has a title to the assets and possessions of his spouse who passed away known as curtesy. Before, there were distinct privileges for living male and female spouses, but in the majority of states, those distinctions have been eliminated.These laws are often referred to as community property laws or equitable distribution laws. They are designed to ensure that both spouses receive a fair share of the marital property, regardless of who earned it or whose name is on the title.

However, the specifics of these laws can vary depending on the state and the circumstances of the case.

To learn more about Curtesy, click here:

brainly.com/question/13171779

#SPJ11

a. True State-corporate crime would be demonstrated in the event that the EPA in the United States refuses to address or turns a blind eye to environmental crimes committed by the fracking business.

fracking industry, Instrumentalists only see the criminal justice system and the law as tools for policing society's upper classes. The federal government agency of the United States is known as the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA. This organization's goal is to safeguard both human and environmental health. This organization controls the handling, usage, and production of certain chemicals and other contaminants. Through fines and other means, the EPA carries out its punishments. The EPA oversees several initiatives that aim to encourage environmental stewardship, energy efficiency, and sustainable growth.

learn more about EPA here:

https://brainly.com/question/8857219

#SPJ4

The statement "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" protects the people's right to practice their religion the way they want.

In the First Amendment, the Constitution says that everyone in the United States has the right to practice his or her own religion.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about freedom of religion

brainly.com/question/2200062

#SPJ1

Answer:#1The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010. It is more commonly known as the Affordable Care ...

#2The ACA was designed to reduce the cost of health insurance coverage for people who qualify for it.

#3March 23, 2010

#4The ACA aimed to ensure that more people had more health insurance coverage in the United States

Explanation:

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, became law on March 23, 2010. ..

The political terms and their meanings have been matched in the space that we have below

Read more on convention  here:https://brainly.com/question/28442712

#SPJ1

Mediation and arbitration are both alternative dispute resolution approaches. Option B.

They are both related to conflict management. They are different processes that are used for resolving disputes peacefully. A brief discussion of mediation and arbitration is given below:

Mediation: In mediation, an impartial third party, known as a mediator, helps the disputants to find a solution to their conflict. The mediator facilitates the communication between the parties and helps them to identify the issues that are important to them.

Mediation is a voluntary process. The parties have control over the outcome of the process and the mediator does not impose any decision on them.

Mediation is an informal process and the parties can present their case in their own way. Mediation can be used to resolve conflicts in many areas, such as family, community, business, and workplace.

Arbitration: In arbitration, an impartial third party, known as an arbitrator, listens to the arguments presented by the parties and makes a decision. The arbitrator's decision is final and binding.

Arbitration is used to resolve disputes in many areas, such as labor management, commercial, construction, and environmental.

The process of arbitration is more formal than mediation. The parties present their case in a structured manner and the arbitrator follows the rules of evidence. The parties have less control over the outcome of the process than they have in mediation.

In summary, mediation and arbitration are both alternative dispute resolution approaches. They are both related to conflict management. They are different processes that are used for resolving disputes peacefully.

Hence, the right answer is option B.

Read more about Disputes at https://brainly.com/question/27705637

#SPJ11

it would be against chris because he cooked the food (is the owner aswell) because dan did't know that the food was contaminated.

Explanation:

Answer:

Advertising plays a major role in how

**NOT OPINION POLLS BUT BRAINLY WONT LET ME SAY IT**

presents or characterizes a political

**candidate**

during election periods. Each ad has a specific

**message**

created to

**persuade**

a viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.

Explanation:

I'm 86% sure that correct but its more helpful than the other awenser for now atleast :P

Advertising plays a major role in how

-(B) Media

Presents or characterizes a political

-(B) Candidate

During election periods. Each ad has a specific

-(B) Message

Created to

-(A) Persuade

A viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.

Media is a sword arm of democracy. In general it means various means of communication.

Media is intended to reach and address a large target group or audience. Media can be categorised into print and digital media.

Media acts as a watchdog to protect public interest against malpractice and create public awareness.

It acts as the fourth pillar of democracy and has an embracing role to act against injustice, oppression, misdeed of our society.

Persuasion is an art of influencing the individual. Persuasion can attempt to influence a person's beliefs, attitude, intention, motivation and behavior.

Psychology looks persuasion through the lens of individual behavior and neuroscience studies the brain activity associated with this behavior.

Persuasion is also often used tool in the pursuit of personal gain such as election campaigning.

It can also be interpreted as using one's personal or positional resources to change people.

To learn more about Media and Persuasion here

https://brainly.com/question/14047162

#SPJ3