Stare Decisis Group of answer choices is an eye condition that can be treated with Lasik is important in the civil law tradition means to stand on decided cases signifies that a court has concurrent jurisdiction is an Egyptian reference to the judge giving you the evil eye

Under the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), there are nine hazard classes for Fully Regulated items.

These classes are used to classify hazardous materials based on their properties and characteristics. Each class has its own specific set of rules and regulations that must be followed when handling, transporting, or disposing of the material. The nine classes include explosives, gases, flammable liquids, flammable solids, oxidizers and organic peroxides, toxic and infectious substances, radioactive materials, corrosives, and miscellaneous hazardous materials. These classifications are designed to ensure the safety of workers, the public, and the environment by minimizing the risks associated with the handling and transportation of hazardous materials.

Learn more about safety :

https://brainly.com/question/11533079

#SPJ1

Answer:

members of the House are elected every two years, whereas senators are elected for six-year terms. ... Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years.

Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts

Explanation:

The House and Senate are equal partners in the legislative process—legislation cannot be enacted without the consent of both chambers. However, the Constitution grants each chamber some unique powers. The Senate ratifies treaties and approves presidential appointments while the House initiates revenue-raising bills.

Answer:

c?

Explanation:

i'm guessing it is c because that is the most reasonable and well one that seems like it might be because you can either hurt someone or attempt murder or something. the other answers are just random and are all legal now that i come to think of it, which is weird.

Answer:c.punishment under common law

Explanation:

Answer:

30 m/s. speed = distance / time.

Explanation:

wavelength of a longitudinal wave is the distance between successive compressions or equivalently the distance between successive rarefactions.  30 m/s. speed = distance / time.

Dust from surface mining is exposed to the atmosphere people breathe, while dust from sub-surface mining is mostly contained in mines, this explains why surface mining causes more widespread health problems than sub-surface mining.

Surface mining is a process of extracting minerals from the surface of the earth. It is also known as open-pit mining or strip mining. Surface mining is the most common type of mining, and it is usually the first step in the mining process. It is used to extract coal, copper, iron, gold, and other minerals.

Surface mining is a very efficient and cost-effective way to extract minerals. It is also a very safe process, and it minimizes the impact on the environment but it pollutes the air in the atmosphere.

Hence, the third option is correct.

To know more about Surface mining, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/13327627

#SPJ1

Answer:

Dust from surface mining is exposed to the atmosphere people breathe, while dust from sub-surface mining is mostly contained in mines, this explains why surface mining causes more widespread health problems than sub-surface mining.

Surface mining is a process of extracting minerals from the surface of the earth. It is also known as open-pit mining or strip mining. Surface mining is the most common type of mining, and it is usually the first step in the mining process. It is used to extract coal, copper, iron, gold, and other minerals.

Surface mining is a very efficient and cost-effective way to extract minerals. It is also a very safe process, and it minimizes the impact on the environment but it pollutes the air in the atmosphere.

Hence, the third option is correct.

Explanation:

Answer:

Falso

Explanation:

It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.

These are sub-roads that connect the houses in the inner city to the main road networks.

Hence, while driving, It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.

Read more about city street

brainly.com/question/25404428

#SPJ1

In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court issued a strong statement regarding the protection of freedom of the press and the unconstitutionality of prior restraint.

The Court held that the government could not censor or prohibit a publication in advance, except in very limited and specific circumstances. This decision reinforced the First Amendment rights to free speech and freedom of the press, emphasizing the importance of these liberties in a democratic society.The Court held that the government cannot prevent publication or dissemination of material unless it poses a clear and present danger to national security.In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court issued a strong statement regarding the First Amendment's protection of freedom of the press. The Court held that a Minnesota law that allowed for the prior restraint of publication of newspapers was unconstitutional. Prior restraint is the government's censorship of speech before it is published or spoken. The Court found that the Minnesota law violated the First Amendment because it allowed the government to censor speech based on its content, rather than on its impact on public safety.

The Court's decision in Near v. Minnesota was a landmark ruling that helped to establish the principle that the First Amendment protects freedom of the press from government censorship. The decision has been cited in numerous subsequent cases involving freedom of speech, and it remains an important precedent today.

The specific language of the Supreme Court's statement in Near v. Minnesota is as follows:

   The general principle that the First Amendment precludes the existence of any prior restraint upon publication cannot be doubted.

The Court went on to explain that the First Amendment protects freedom of the press because it is essential to a free and democratic society. The Court stated that "the press was to be free from previous restraints because it is essential to the role of the press to serve as a check on government power."

The Court's decision in Near v. Minnesota was a major victory for freedom of the press, and it helped to ensure that the First Amendment would continue to protect the right of the press to publish without government censorship.

To learn more about Supreme Court  visit: https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ11

Answer:

B I think

Explanation:

Contractual theory defines and establishes the seller's duties in a contractual relationship with the buyer. These duties include delivering goods, ensuring conformity, transferring title, and complying with legal and industry standards.

Under contractual theory, a seller has certain duties that arise from the contractual agreement with the buyer. These duties typically include:

To know more about Contractual theory

brainly.com/question/32396011

#SPJ11

The answer is option b. The percentage of women has doubled since the 1970s but females still only comprise 12%.

This statement is true regarding changing profile of a police officer.

Police, a group of policemen who serve as the government's civil service. Police are generally in charge of doing law and order, protecting the public, and stopping, identifying, and looking into illegal activity. Policing is the term used to show these activities.

Investigation, capture, and custody of those accused of committing crimes are among the main responsibilities of law enforcement.

To know more about Police visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24655820

#SPJ1

Here's the sample response:

If the first pond contains chemicals, then it will have fewer frogs because the chemicals will kill the frogs before they can lay eggs.

Here's my response that will get you a 100%:

If the first pond contains chemicals, less frogs will be present because the chemicals can destroy the frogs until they can lay eggs.

Offenders who commit their first offense later in life are known as : b. elderly first-time offenders.

Elderly first-time offenders can be defined as the person  that is above the age of 50 years old who committed and offence for the first time and is classified as a first time offender by the court of law.

An habitual offender on the other hand can be defined as the person who always commit an offence or a person that has been previously convicted due to the offence they have committed.

Based on this elderly first-time offenders is a person who has never be convicted in which the first offence they committed  happens when they were  getting old.

Therefore the correct option is B.

Learn more about elderly first-time offenders here:https://brainly.com/question/17199551

#SPJ1

The False Claims Act imposes civil liability on any person who knowingly submits, or causes the submission of, a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government.

The False Claims Act is a federal law that prohibits the submission of false or fraudulent claims for payment to the government, or the making of false statements to obtain government benefits. The law is intended to protect the government from fraud and abuse, and to encourage whistleblowers to report fraudulent activity. Under the False Claims Act, individuals who bring successful lawsuits against individuals or companies that have submitted false claims to the government may be eligible for rewards, known as qui tam actions.  

Learn more about federal government.

https://brainly.com/question/371257

#SPJ4

Answer:

One of the findings was that it was possible to see that prisons were able to reduce the level of violence against women.

Explanation:

The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment sought to stipulate which punishment was most effective in decreasing cases of domestic violence. For this, they will observe the effects of arrests, mediations and separations in incidents of domestic violence, applied to a group of offenders convicted of this type of crime. During the evaluation of the results, it was observed that prisons were more effective in decreasing the rate of repeated domestic violence against women, as offenders who were arrested had the lowest rate of recidivism of domestic violence, in contrast to other punishments.

Answer:

The argument for the company would be based on the fact that, she could have had a defective tooth which only broke while eating the Katydids candies. Most times, the warranty offered in food is with regards to the food being expired, unwholesome for eating due to foreign materials inside etc.

Her filing for breach of warranty over her defective tooth is uncalled for.

Explanation:

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

Answer:

Explanation:

The Appellate Court, also known as the Court of Appeals, is a judicial court that hears cases which have been already heard in other courts. The duty of an appellate court is to review the processes and verdicts givens by the trial courts.

Here, since Sally is not satisfied with the judgement made by the trial court, she can apply for a hearing in the Appellate Court. The appellate court would review hear case and make the final decision.

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.

An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.

Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.

Section 442-C of the New York State Real Property Law states that

who could be held accountable for a salesperson's actions

A broker commits a misdemeanor if he employs a salesperson who does not have the necessary license to do so.

No violation of this article by a real estate salesman or employee of a real estate broker shall be deemed to be cause for the revocation or suspension of the broker's license, unless it appears that the broker had actual knowledge of such violation or retains the benefits, profits, or proceeds of a transaction wrongfully negotiated by his salesman or employee after notice of the salesman's or employee's misconduct.

Learn more about " NYS Real Property Law " to visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/14375848

#SPJ4

This is not ethical, he should ask for their help instead of just taking it. No one would be injured and everyone would probably be okay. It is illegal because he would use his employers money to live on until payday and its not his money.

Myron's actions are not ethical, could harm his employer, and are illegal. It would be wiser for him to seek alternative means of financial assistance rather than resorting to deceitful tactics.

The study of ethics, often known as moral philosophy, "involves systematizing, defending, and endorsing conceptions of good and bad action,".

Axiology is a subfield of philosophy that consists of the fields of ethics and aesthetics. These fields are concerned with issues of value.

With the definition of terms like good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime, ethics aims to answer concerns about human morality.

The theoretical significance and context of moral claims, as well as how to assess their veracity, is the subject of meta-ethics. Normative ethics, which is concerned with the methods used in practice to choose a moral path of conduct.

Applied ethics, which deals with what a person has a responsibility to do in a particular circumstance or area of activity.

Learn more about ethics, here

https://brainly.com/question/11992384

#SPJ3

White fragility is a term coined by Robin DiAngelo to describe the defensiveness and discomfort exhibited by white people when confronted with issues of race and racism.

It is characterized by a range of defensive responses, including anger, fear, guilt, and withdrawal, which are aimed at preserving a sense of comfort and racial dominance.

According to DiAngelo, white fragility is a result of the socialization of white people into a system of racial privilege, which leads them to view challenges to this privilege as personal attacks rather than opportunities for growth and learning.

The term has been used to explain why many white people may become defensive or dismissive when discussing issues of race, rather than engaging in productive conversations or actions to combat racism.

Critics of the concept argue that it may further polarize discussions on race and detract from substantive action to address systemic racism.

To know more about combat racism click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14394437#

#SPJ11

The local government of Hialeah, Florida, abided by the Supreme Court decision to ensure religious freedom, although residents overwhelmingly opposed it.

According to human rights and the constitution of the United States, religious freedom connotes the right of an individual to:

Religious freedom guarantees acting according to the dictates of one's conscience.

Thus, the local government of Hialeah, Florida, abided by the Supreme Court decision to ensure religious freedom, although residents overwhelmingly opposed it.

Learn more about religious freedom at https://brainly.com/question/81196

It is False that Jurisdiction over a defendant is not referred to as subject matter jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction is the authority that a court has to hear a particular type of case based on the subject matter of the case.

Jurisdiction over a defendant, on the other hand, is referred to as personal jurisdiction or territorial jurisdiction.Personal jurisdiction is the court’s power over the defendant, which is acquired by providing the defendant with notice of the proceedings and affording the defendant an opportunity to be heard. Personal jurisdiction may be obtained in a number of ways, including through the defendant’s presence in the state, through the defendant’s consent to jurisdiction, or through the defendant’s contacts with the state.Territorial jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to hear cases that arise within a particular geographic area, such as a state or county. Territorial jurisdiction is established by statute or constitution and is based on the geographic location of the events that gave rise to the case.In conclusion, subject matter jurisdiction and personal or territorial jurisdiction are different types of jurisdiction that are important for courts to have in order to hear and decide cases.

to know about Jurisdiction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ11

According to power-control theory, Egalitarian families produces daughters whose law-violating behavior mirrors that of their brothers. Correct option is c.

According to the power-control hypothesis, the power relationships in the home can explain the gendered patterns of delinquency. Egalitarian households, regardless of gender, have equal power and authority between both parents. As a result, both sons and daughters have more equal access to opportunities and duties within the family. Because they are not constrained or socialised into more traditional gender roles that may deter criminality, daughters in egalitarian homes are more likely to display patterns of law-violating behaviour that are similar to those of their brothers.

However, in paternalistic homes, where the men are more in charge and have more influence, the daughters are more likely to be socialised to comply to established gender norms, which may deter law-breaking behaviour.

To know more about power-control theory,

https://brainly.com/question/31713088

#SPJ4

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

In South Africa, brewing beer at home is legal for own consumption. However, it is illegal to sell the beer and now during the lock down period transporting alcohol is also prohibited.

Answer:

Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a colonial-era law that criminalized homosexuality and other forms of sexual activity between individuals of the same sex. The law, which was enacted in 1860, classified such behavior as "carnal intercourse against the order of nature" and punished it with imprisonment up to life.

The interpretation and application of Section 377 has been the subject of significant controversy and activism, with many people advocating for its repeal or revision in order to protect the rights and dignity of LGBTQ individuals in India. The law has been used to arrest, prosecute, and discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation, and has had a significant impact on the ability of LGBTQ people to openly express their identity and engage in intimate relationships.

In 2018, India's Supreme Court declared Section 377 unconstitutional, ruling that it violated the right to privacy and equality guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. This ruling was widely celebrated as a significant victory for LGBTQ rights in India, and has since been implemented nationwide.