It is true that over past 50 years, the sentencing options available to the judges have increased.
What is a judge?A judge is a public official appointed or elected to preside over legal proceedings in a court of law. The role of a judge is to interpret and apply the law impartially, weigh the evidence presented by the parties involved, and make rulings and decisions based on the facts of the case and the applicable laws. Judges play a critical role in ensuring that the legal system operates fairly and justly, and their decisions can have a significant impact on the lives of the individuals and communities affected by their rulings. Judges may specialize in different areas of law, such as criminal, civil, or family law, and they may serve at different levels of the court system, from local trial courts to state supreme courts and federal courts.
To learn more about judge, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30704261
#SPJ4
As citizens, we have both freedoms and which of the following?
a) Responsibilities
b) Regulations
c) Debates
d) Voices
Bài 1: Công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài đăng kí doanh nghiệp ngày 10/10/2015 với 3 cổ đông sáng lập là A, B, C. Công ty có vốn điều lệ là 1 tỷ và phát hành 100.000 cổ phiếu (mỗi cổ phần trị giá 10.000 đồng) trong đó cổ phần phổ thông 800 triệu, 50 triệu CPUD biểu quyết và 150 triệu CPUD cổ tức. Hỏi: a, A, B, C phải đăng kí mua ít nhất bao nhiêu cổ phần phổ thông. b, Ông Đức nắm giữ 10% cổ phần của công ty và muốn mua thêm cổ phần ưu đãi biểu quyết của công ty Tấn Tài. Yêu cầu trên có được không. C, Tháng 10/2019 ông A do không hài lòng với các chính sách của công ty nên đã chuyển nhượng các cổ phần của mình cho người khác. - Ông A có được chuyển nhượng không? Vì sao? - Nếu A chuyển nhượng hết thì hậu quả pháp lý đối với công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài là gì?
Explanation:
get Garbrumeyjjethztjarhatjztjafnatmstbatnatntn
Hal and Falstaff got into a fight in a bar, and Hal pushed Falstaff to the ground and repeatedly kicked him in the head. Hal was arrested for assault, and Falstaff sued Hal for battery. One week before the criminal trial, Hal paid Falstaff $10,000 and Falstaff dropped the battery case against him. During the criminal trial, the prosecutor calls Falstaff to the stand and asks him whether Hal paid money to him after the assault. The defense attorney objects. The prosecutor's answer would be:
Answer:
It's relevant, Your Honor.
now its up to the judge whether Falstaff answers or not
Function of law in society
Answer
To control disruptive behaviour.
Explanation:
Although there are several functions of law in society, yet it is to control the disruptive behaviour of individuals. In a society where there is no law, such will be characterised with disorderliness. Law helps to resolve dispute, protects right and freedom, establish rules of conduct, provides a system of enforcement and protect the society at large.
Laws are created in a society to instill discipline on it's citizens and to set out clearly what is right from what is wrong. It also maintains social order, economic and political stability in a society. It maintains social order in the scenes that there is a limit to how individuals must act in relation to one another in any given society.
Other functions of law are that it governs how people behave and then set out how government would deal with such behaviour. Individuals also have power or rights under law hence create a limit to government power which in turn promote peace in a society.
Explanation of the General Strain Theory in criminology?
if you need 27 Pont her you go.
Answer:
e
Explanation:
Microscopes use _______ lenses which refract the light to a single point, causing the image of the object to appear larger.
Convex
They take light from all points and converge them into one, defined point. This gives it the ability to enlarge an image.
I hope this helps! :)
3. True or False: An alcohol-related motor vehicle crash in the U.S. kills one person every 3.5 hours. TRUE FALSE
The given statement is false.
How many drinking and driving-related deaths happen in the US every year?
Alcohol is a leading cause of traffic fatalities ingesting and using kill 28 people an afternoon within the U.S. about one man or woman every 52 mins in keeping with the countrywide toll road visitors protection administration (NHTSA). this is more than 10,000 lives misplaced every 12 months to driving.
Every day, approximately 32 humans in America die in inebriated-using crashes it truly is one character every 45 minutes. In 2020, 11,654 human beings died in alcohol-impaired driving traffic deaths a 14% growth from 2019.
Learn more about Alcohol here: https://brainly.com/question/947751
#SPJ2
If Irene accepts goods shipped from Indonesia that were wrongfully obtained, has she committed an intentional tort against property? Explain.
CIVICS (question in photo below)
Answer:
I think the answer should be the last one "placing a trade embargo on oil
Explanation:
The reason I believe the answer is number 4 is because a domestic policy affects or applies to people/institutions within a particular country and they tend to be internal and so after using that definition the best-fit answer would be number 4.
A cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in your bank in Italy. What documents would you require him to do it? Imagine that the trader explains his business in detail, and he says that he buys cryptocurrency online and sells them for more money to make a profit. He has financial statements; ha pays taxes and has all of this in the rule. Do you think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes? Would you open the account to him?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
If a cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in my bank in Italy, I would be very strict in order to proceed with his request. I would double-check the present legislation in Italy regarding Anti-money Laundering and all the laws regarding international finance and banking transactions. And do not want to have any problems with the law.
The documents I would require him to provide are the legal constitution of his company in a real country, not in the so-called "fiscal paradises" such as Andorra. He would have to provide me with all the documents that prove he runs a legal business and I would take these documents to the legal department of the bank to prove and certify them.
I would also ask my assistant to personally check on the web or public criminal records to know if the ma's company has had any problems in the past that had affected his reputation.
I would ask him to explain his business in detail, with the presence of an expert in the cryptocurrency business. I would require a copy of the company's financial statements, his taxes, and proof that he has no debt. He needs to prove that all the documents are in perfect rule.
Yes, I think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes because that is the nature of the cryptocurrency business. It has not been regulated by any government in the world. That is the reason why almost no bank in the world or country accepts cryptocurrency as normal currency. It is so volatile. Indeed, nobody regulates cryptocurrency. And the proof is the thew bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies change their value on a daily basis.
I would think twice about accepting opening the account to hi, It is risky to the first degree.
The Writing Requirement: Jason Novell, doing business as Novell Associates,
hired Barbara Meade to work for him. The parties orally agreed on the terms of
employment, including payment of a share of the company's income to Meade,
but they did not put anything in writing. Two years later, Meade quit. Novell then
told Meade that she was entitled to $9,602 - 25% of the difference between the
accounts receivable and the accounts payable as of Meade's last day of work.
Meade disagreed, and demanded more than $63,500 - 25% of the revenue from
all invoices, less the cost of materials and outside processing, for each of the years
that she had worked for Novell. Meade filed a lawsuit against Novell for breach of
contract.
Discuss whether or not there is an enforceable contract (including a discussion on
the Statute of Frauds and any exception -if any - that may apply).
Regarding Barbara Meade's employment with Novell Associates, it is necessary to take into account the enforceability of the oral agreement between Jason Novell and Meade, especially in light of the Statute of Frauds.
A legal concept known as the Statute of Frauds mandates that some transactions must be in writing in order to be enforceable. But the Statute of Frauds has several exceptions that could apply in particular circumstances.
Contracts for the rendering of services are not covered by the Statute of Frauds. As a result, an oral employment contract, like the one between Novell and Meade, may be binding even in the absence of a written agreement.
Learn more about the Statute of Fraud, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30409098
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP
Which of the following can help the judge in deciding the severity of a sentence?
a. The opening statements
b. A victim impact statement
c. The witness testimony
d. The final argument
Answer:
The correct answer is b. A victim impact statement.
Explanation:
A victim impact statement is a statement made by the victim or their representative during the sentencing phase of a criminal trial. It provides the victim with an opportunity to express the emotional, physical, and financial impact of the crime on their life. This information can be relevant to the judge in determining the severity of the sentence, as it allows the judge to consider the harm caused to the victim and the community as a result of the crime.
While the other options, including a. opening statements, c. witness testimony, and d. final arguments, can provide valuable information to the judge during a trial, they may not necessarily be directly related to determining the severity of a sentence. The victim impact statement, on the other hand, is specifically designed to inform the judge about the impact of the crime on the victim, which can be a factor in determining the appropriate sentence for the offender.
If OC expert is requiring pre-payment of depo fee, does DFC prepay and then sends citizens the invoice?
No, DFC does not prepay the OC Expert's deposition fee. DFC will invoice the citizen for the OC Expert's fee, and the citizen is responsible for making the payment directly to the OC Expert.
What is fee ?Fee is a payment made to a person or organization for services rendered. It is typically charged as a flat rate or hourly rate, and can be paid either in advance or after the service has been provided. Fees can be paid for a variety of services, such as legal advice, medical treatments, or educational courses. They can also be paid to an individual or organization for the use of goods, property, or other resources. Fees are an important source of income for many businesses and organizations, and in most cases, payment of the fee is required before the service can be rendered.
To learn more about fee
https://brainly.com/question/29578294
#SPJ1
This is Ethics class question.
How does the legal inequity of America's past affect inequity
that remains across ethnic lines today? please answer it in essay
form and cited it.
The racial inequality that was prevalent in America's past has remain across the ethnic lines of today and we can see from the incidents from the various incidents that took place in America. Even though great leaders have fought for the inequality still we could identify such acts for instance during the George Floyd's case.
Racial inequality in a society refers to the unequal distribution of resources, power, and economic opportunity across races. While the discussion of racial inequality in the United States is often focused on economic inequality, racial inequality manifests itself in a variety of ways that impact the well-being of all Americans both individually and collectively. This includes disparities in wealth, education, employment, housing, mobility, health, incarceration rates, and other areas.
Learn more about inequality, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28774329
#SPJ4
What are the major responsibilities of OIG( Office Of Inspector General), related to coded healthcare data? What are other responsibilities of this office related to fraud and abuse?
To conduct audits and investigations of every aspect of the agency's initiatives and operations. Coordinate or suggest policies for agency actions and contacts between NARA and other federal agencies in order to maximize efficiency and reduce waste, abuse, and mismanagement.
Who is the Office Of Inspector General?The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) Office of Inspector General (OIG) is a stand-alone division tasked with upholding the integrity of agency operations and programs.
To carry out audits and investigations of all facets of the agency's operations and projects.
In order to enhance efficiency and minimize waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement, coordinate or recommend policies for agency activities and for interactions between NARA and other federal agencies.
The Inspector General's mandate is to: Perform independent and impartial audits and investigations relating to DHS programs and operations, as per the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended.
Increase the effectiveness, economy, and efficiency of DHS operations and initiatives.
Avoid and identify fraud, waste, and abuse.
Therefore, to conduct audits and investigations of every aspect of the agency's initiatives and operations. Coordinate or suggest policies for agency actions and contacts between NARA and other federal agencies in order to maximize efficiency and reduce waste, abuse, and mismanagement.
Know more about the Office Of Inspector General here:
https://brainly.com/question/30360934
#SPJ1
Complete question:
What are the major responsibilities of OIG( Office Of Inspector General), related to coded healthcare data?
The Court of Justice acts as:_____.
a. the co-legislator for almost all European laws.
b. a consultative body rather than a legislative body.
c. the supreme appeals court for European Union law.
d. the ultimate controlling authority within the EU for legislation.
e. a monitor for EU compliance laws.
february 17, 1970, the family of this man was attacked and it was later determined via crime scene reconstruction that he was guilty of attacking his own family.
Compare a dictatorship and a federal republic.
Answer:
A dictatorship is a form of government characterized by a single leader (dictator) or group of leaders that hold government power promised to the people and little or no toleration for political pluralism or independent media.
AND
A federal republic is a federation of states with a republican form of government. At its core, the literal meaning of the word republic when used to reference a form of government means: "a country that is governed by elected representatives and by an elected leader (such as a president) rather than by a king or queen".
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Pls mark brainliest :}
And have an amazing day <3
Badger Bank and Trust (Badger) is a community bank in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Badger loaned $5,000 to Plessy and charged him an interest rate that was five (5) percent higher than the statutorily- allowed maximum. This loan would be considered____.
a. usurious
b. fraudulent
c. valid, since Badger can determine what potential profit is necessary to compensated it and its owners for the assumed risk
d. voidable at the election of Badger
e. void at the election of Plessy
Based on the rate charged to Plessy, we can determine that this loan is a. usurious.
When a loan is usurious:
It means that the interest charged is exorbitant It is considered immoral It can be considered illegal if it is above the rate required by law for such loans.The interest charged is 5% higher than what the law allows here which means that the rate must be quite high.
We can therefore conclude that this loan is usurious and action can be taken against it.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/6668760.
John and Mary were on their way home from the store when their car stalled in the middle of an intersection. Although the intersection was well lit, a car going in the same direction struck the rear of their car. At the same time, another vehicle also struck their car in the front right side. Both John and Mary were injured from the collisions. The first vehicle driver had no insurance on his vehicle. The second vehicle did have insurance but only had the minimum amount of liability coverage required by the state. John and Mary were both injured severely and spent many weeks in the hospital causing both a large hospital bill and also missing work for many months. John and Mary did have full insurance coverage with medium high limits. What type of coverage from John and Mary’s insurance policy would provide insurance coverage for them in the case of the other vehicle driver’s insufficient coverage? Be specific and state the reason for your answer.
If the driver of the other car had insufficient insurance, John and Mary's uninsured/underinsured motorist policy would provide them with insurance coverage. It aids in paying for medical costs and missed earnings due to the accident.
John and Mary's insurance policy should include uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, which would protect them if the other car driver's coverage was insufficient. This coverage is intended to protect policyholders in the event of a collision with a motorist who does not have insurance or has insufficient insurance coverage.
The first motorist in this case had no insurance, and the second driver had only the bare minimum of liability coverage. Because John and Mary have full coverage with medium-high limits, their uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage should cover their medical expenses and lost wages as a result of the accident.
Learn more about insurance:
https://brainly.com/question/30291521
#SPJ1
The legal system of the 1800s depended on testimony regarding physical evidence from scientists of what profession?
Answer:
Pathology is the study of the effects of disease on the body, while forensic pathology studies the disease of crime.
Explanation:
Quizlet yeah
Question 5
5. Which of the following was established by Article I of the United States
Constitution?
O It established that Congress should consist of the Senate and the House of Representatives
O It established that Congress has full and exclusive legislative capacity.
All of the choices are correct.
20 pts
Oit established Congress,
Answer:
O all the choices are correct.
Explanation:
The supremacy of the people through their elected representatives is recognized in Article I, which creates a Congress consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives. The positioning of Congress at the beginning of the Constitution affirms its status as the “First Branch” of the federal government.
_________________which type of Court handles a large annual caseload
Answer:
The Supreme Court of the United States
Explanation:
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the American judicial system, and has the power to decide appeals on all cases brought in federal court or those brought in state court but dealing with federal law.
Answer:
District Court
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
Why is it a good idea to have a carbon monoxide detector in the home?
A.
to prevent an allergic reaction
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
C.
to warn members of the household of smoke from a fire
Answer:
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
b
Explanation:
what are the three levels of courts, starting from the level at which a criminal case is first heard?
Answer:
Explanation:
The three levels of courts, starting from the level at which a criminal case is first heard, vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system. However, in many common law jurisdictions, including the United States, the levels of courts are typically as follows:
Trial Courts (or Courts of First Instance): Trial courts are the lowest level of courts where criminal cases are initially heard and tried. These courts are responsible for receiving evidence, examining witnesses, and making determinations of guilt or innocence. Trial courts may have different names depending on the jurisdiction, such as district courts, superior courts, or circuit courts.
Appellate Courts (or Courts of Appeal): Appellate courts are the intermediate level of courts that review decisions made by the trial courts. They do not conduct new trials or re-examine the facts of the case. Instead, their main role is to review the legal arguments and procedures used in the trial court to determine if any errors occurred. Appellate courts can affirm, reverse, or modify the decisions made at the trial court level. They may be referred to as courts of appeals, appellate divisions, or appellate courts.
Supreme Court (or Court of Final Appeal): The Supreme Court is the highest level of court in the judicial system. It serves as the court of last resort and typically has the final authority to review and decide on legal issues. The Supreme Court's role is to provide final interpretations of laws and to ensure uniformity and consistency in legal principles within the jurisdiction. Not all countries have a Supreme Court, but in those that do, it is usually the highest court in the hierarchy.
It's important to note that the specific names and organization of courts may vary across different countries and legal systems. Additionally, some jurisdictions may have additional levels of specialized courts, such as family courts, constitutional courts, or administrative courts, which handle specific types of cases.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
What is a free lawyer
Answer:
basically a lawyer who can help you in your case for free and it is under the U.S. constitution that you must have a lawyer and these lawyers will fill in
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Answer the following questions in complete sentences:
- How is the role of an appointed judge in government different from an elected official?
- How is the role of an appointed judge in government similar to that of an elected official?
- Do you think federal judges should be elected? Explain why or why not.
1. The role of an appointed judge in government differs from that of an elected official as appointed judges are chosen by the executive branch or a judicial nominating commission, and they serve for life or until retirement, while elected officials are chosen by the people, and their terms are limited.
2. The role of an appointed judge in government is similar to that of an elected official in that both are responsible for upholding and interpreting the law.
How do appointed judges and elected officials differ and how are they similar?The main difference between appointed judges and elected officials is the process by which they are selected and the length of their terms.
Appointed judges are chosen by the executive branch or a judicial nominating commission and serve for life or until retirement, while elected officials are chosen by the people and their terms are limited. This difference can affect the degree of political influence and accountability that judges and elected officials faces.
Read more about appointed judges
brainly.com/question/30830451
#SPJ1
Which of the following entities are responsible for implementing
guidelines or requirements for ethical and/or consenting research
experiments? Select all that apply.
IRB
ONIJ
DAS
OIRS
Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
What are IRB ethical guidelines?Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
People with expertise and training in non-scientific fields, people with expertise and training in scientific fields, and members of the community who might serve as subjects for research studies make up the Institutional Review Board (IRB), a committee.
An IRB has the power to approve, demand changes are made (to secure approval), or disapprove research in accordance with FDA regulations. The rights and welfare of human research subjects are safeguarded in large part by this group review.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a) IRB.
To learn more about IRB refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8905808
#SPJ4