Answers
True. Many Americans became afraid that the weak central government established by the Articles would not be able to handle future outbreaks like the Shay Rebellion, which was one of the reasons the Articles of
An armed insurrection known as the Shay Rebellion took place in western Massachusetts between 1786 and 1787. Farmers and veterans who were having financial difficulties and felt their state government was not doing enough to assist them spearheaded the rebellion. They demonstrated against excessive taxes, debt, and a lack of paper money to cover their debts. The uprising was given its name in honour of Daniel Shays, a former captain in the Continental Army. State militia eventually put an end to the rebellion, but it exposed the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation and the necessity for a more Shay Rebellion government to uphold the law and avert further disturbances.
Learn more about Shay Rebellion,here:
https://brainly.com/question/19692099
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Pleading the Fifth" refers to what part of the Fifth Amendment?
Answers
Known as Miranda rights, these rights include the right to remain silent, the right to have an attorney present during questioning, and the right to have a government-appointed attorney if the suspect cannot afford one.
Pleading the Fifth" refers to what part of the Fifth Amendment?
The Fifth Amendment breaks down into five rights or protections: the right to a jury trial when you are charged with a crime, protection against double jeopardy, safety against self-incrimination, the proper to a fair trial, and safety against the taking of property by means of the authorities besides compensation riminatory.
What are the three parts of the 5th Amendment?
Known as Miranda rights, these rights include the proper to stay silent, the proper to have an lawyer current during questioning, and the right to have a government-appointed lawyer if the suspect can't find the money for one.
Learn more about Miranda rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/2242029
#SPJ1
이
The scenario below describes an event during World War 1:
"A Socialist Party member distributed pamphlets stating: "The
Socialist Party says that...officers of the law ... violate the ... United
States Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, when they
refuse to recognize your right to assert your opposition to the
draft." The Socialist Party member was arrested and convicted for
distributing these pamphlets. The Socialist Party member
appealed his arrest and conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court
which upheld the government's actions."
What long term precedent was established by this U.S. Suprdone
Court decision?
First Amendment rights are protected but not unlimited.
Tenth Amendment rights are protected but not unlimited.
Selective service is constitutional.
Party membership is unconstitutional.
Answers
Answer: First Amendment rights are protected but not unlimited.
Explanation:
Eugene Victor "Gene" Debs was convicted under the Sedition Act of 1918 under President Wilson after he criticized the war draft. He appealed to the Supreme Court which found that although the Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech in the First Amendment, the right was not absolute if it was judged to impede on the welfare of the nation.
This became a long term precedent that has been used by the Executive branch to ensure compliance with certain directives and protect certain information from the public sphere.
According to Article 1 of the Constitution, all revenue bills must begin in what part of
Congress? Why do you think the founders stated this?
Answers
Answer:
House of Representatives
Explanation:
They may have said this because they know that bills with money in it, may affect the PEOPLE, the House of Representative represent the people, so, that would be the best explanation.
distributions contain low-frequency extreme low scores without low-frequency extreme high scores
Answers
In statistical distributions, such as probability distributions or frequency distribution, it is possible to have low-frequency extreme low scores without low-frequency extreme high scores. This situation can occur when the distribution is skewed or exhibits asymmetry.
Skewness refers to the lack of symmetry in a distribution. If a distribution is positively skewed, it means that the tail on the right-hand side (higher values) is longer or more spread out than the left-hand side.
On the other hand, if a distribution is negatively skewed, the tail on the left-hand side (lower values) is longer or more spread out than the right-hand side.
When a distribution is positively skewed, it implies that there are relatively more low scores (values on the left-hand side) and fewer high scores (values on the right-hand side). This can be caused by factors such as natural limits, floor effects, or constraints within the data.
For example, if we consider the income distribution of a population, it is common to observe a large number of individuals with relatively low incomes but a smaller number of individuals with extremely high incomes.
For such more question on distribution:
https://brainly.com/question/30725739
#SPJ8
All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least _____.
Answers
Answer:
1) They need to be at least 23 yet under 37
2) A four year minimum degree from an american college/university
3) valid driver’s license
4) must be a US citizen
5) must have completed at least two years of professional work experience, or one year for those that hold a master’s or higher degree.
6) must comply with the FBI Drug Policy and meet the physical fitness standards described below.
7) must be able to be cleared for Top Secret SCI (Secure Compartmentalized Information).
Answer:
A bachelors degree
Explanation:
In the United States, a court case involving the ownership of a patent would be heard by which court?
State or the Supreme Court
Federal only
Federal or state
State only
Answers
Answer: the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Patent case appeals are heard by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) (see Question 1, Order of precedence). The US Supreme Court hears appeals from the CAFC on a discretionary basis.
Explanation:
Federal only i think
In the twenty-two years from 1992 to 2014, the percentage of people arrested for burglary who were women __________.
a. decreased dramatically
b. decreased slightly
c. increased slightly
d. increased dramatically
d. increased dramatically
Answers
In the twenty-two years from 1992 to 2014, the percentage of people arrested for burglary who were women increased dramatically (Option D).
What is Burglary?Burglary is the illegal entry into a structure or other site with the intent to commit a crime. It's also known as housebreaking and breaking and entering. The majority of jurisdictions classify a number of offenses as burglary, but often this crime involves theft, robbery, or murder.
Finally, the term "burglary" now refers to entering someone else's property without their consent in order to conduct a felony there.
Learn more about burglary here: https://brainly.com/question/10411138
#SPJ1
state two alternative definitions of white collar crime and give
an example of one crime that fits under both definitions
Answers
White-collar crime can be defined as non-violent illegal activities committed by individuals or organizations in business or professional settings. It involves financially motivated actions that typically exploit positions of trust, power, or access. An example that fits under both definitions is insider trading.
Definition 1: Non-violent criminal acts carried out by people in corporate or professional contexts are referred to as white-collar crime. These offenses frequently involve fraud, embezzlement, or other deceitful tactics and are motivated by money. People in positions of trust, like executives, accountants, or bankers, frequently commit such crimes. A business executive embezzling money from the company's accounts for personal advantage is an example that fulfills this criteria.
Definition 2: White-collar crime can also refer to wrongdoings carried out by businesses or organizations. This concept places a strong emphasis on the communal nature of the crime, where groups commit crimes for financial benefit. Price-fixing agreements between rival businesses to artificially inflate prices and increase profits all around are examples that suit this criteria. Another example is a company engaging in accounting fraud to manipulate financial statements and deceive investors or regulators.
The non-violent nature of the criminal activity, the financial incentive behind the deeds, and the abuse of positions of trust, influence, or access to further the crimes are the fundamental elements that define white-collar crime according to both definitions.
To know more about White-collar crime here https://brainly.com/question/1573032
#SPJ4
What are the two most common settings for legitimate non-compete agreements?
Answers
in this case, the court determined it had personal jurisdiction. did the court also have jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
It is not possible to answer this question without more specific information about the case in question.
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to exercise power over a particular individual or entity, such as the defendant in a lawsuit. It is based on a variety of factors, such as the defendant's presence or contacts within the jurisdiction, and is distinct from jurisdiction over property.
Jurisdiction over property, also known as in rem jurisdiction, refers to a court's authority to adjudicate disputes over specific property, regardless of who owns or possesses that property. In rem jurisdiction can be based on a variety of factors, such as the location of the property or the source of a particular claim.
Whether or not the court in the case in question had jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries would depend on the specific facts of the case and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. Without further information, it is impossible to say whether the court had jurisdiction over property as well as over the individuals involved in the case.
Speculate on the different social dynamics behind lower - class drug use and middle -class drug use. For example , are there likely to be differences in motivation for use ? In the way individuals are introduced to drugs ? In the consequences for drug use ?
Answers
the debate over abolishing police discretion paralleled similar debates over discretion in other parts of the criminal justice system, such as group of answer choices
Answers
According to the given statement other parts of the criminal justice system Abolishing discretion.
What is the key purpose of the criminal justice system?The justice system strives to provide "justice for all." This means defending the helpless, condemning offenders, and setting up a fair justice system in order to maintain order throughout the country. Thus, it guarantees the safety of our populace.
Why is having a criminal justice system important?Prevent additional crimes in our society. Control people's behavior and behaviors, particularly that of criminals. Ensure the victim is at ease. rehabilitation and treatment. There are numerous institutions and governmental bodies that make up the justice system. The goals include helping victims emotionally, rehabilitating criminals, and stopping fresh crimes.
To know more about Criminal justice system visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24622613
#SPJ4
Write about the five principles of contract administration and indicate which components you feel can result in the biggest problems with subcontractors if not done well.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Contract administration is the process of managing and monitoring contracts after they have been awarded to ensure that the parties involved fulfill their obligations. It is a critical aspect of project management and involves ensuring that the contractor performs the work in accordance with the contract's terms and conditions. The following are the five principles of contract administration:
Communication: Effective communication is essential for successful contract administration. It involves regular and open communication between the parties involved to clarify expectations, exchange information, and resolve issues as they arise.
Documentation: Proper documentation is critical to ensure that the parties involved fulfill their obligations. This includes keeping accurate records of all communications, changes, and payments made throughout the project.
Compliance: Compliance with the contract's terms and conditions is vital to ensure that the project meets its objectives. It is necessary to ensure that all parties adhere to the terms of the contract, including quality standards, timelines, and budget.
Risk Management: Contract administration involves identifying and managing risks associated with the project. This includes identifying potential risks, assessing their likelihood and impact, and developing strategies to mitigate them.
Performance Evaluation: Performance evaluation involves monitoring the contractor's performance to ensure that they deliver on the project's objectives. This includes assessing the quality of work, meeting timelines, and managing costs.
Of these principles, communication and compliance are crucial components that can result in significant problems with subcontractors if not done well. Failure to communicate effectively can lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of the contract's terms and conditions, resulting in delays, disputes, and additional costs. Compliance is also essential to ensure that subcontractors adhere to the project's requirements and quality standards, and any deviations can have significant consequences for the project's success.
In summary, effective contract administration is essential for ensuring successful project outcomes. It requires adherence to the five principles of communication, documentation, compliance, risk management, and performance evaluation, with particular attention to effective communication and compliance to avoid problems with subcontractors.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The five principles of contract administration include clarity and completeness, communication, documentation, compliance, and risk management. Each of these principles is critical to ensuring that a contract is executed effectively and efficiently.
The component that can result in the biggest problems with subcontractors if not done well is communication. Effective communication is key to ensuring that both parties understand their obligations and responsibilities under the contract. Miscommunication can lead to misunderstandings, delays, and even litigation.
For example, if the subcontractor is unclear about the scope of work or the timeline for completion, they may miss deadlines or deliver subpar work, resulting in additional costs and delays. Similarly, if the contractor fails to communicate changes to the contract or other important information, the subcontractor may not be able to perform as required, leading to further complications.
To avoid these issues, it is important to establish clear lines of communication from the outset, including regular meetings and progress updates, as well as a system for addressing issues or concerns as they arise. Both parties should also be clear on their respective roles and responsibilities, including any reporting requirements or deadlines.
Overall, effective contract administration requires attention to all five principles, but clear communication is the linchpin that holds them all together. By prioritizing communication and ensuring that both parties are on the same page, contractors can avoid many of the common pitfalls that can arise when working with subcontractors.
To learn more about contract administration refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31200613
#SPJ11
What is the role of criminal law?
Answers
The main role of criminal law is to maintain order and law. Criminal laws must be enforced while safeguarding the rights of both victims and those who are accused of having committed such crimes.
The "Principle of Natural Justice" is the cornerstone of criminal justice. Criminal law is just one of the tools used by organized societies to safeguard individuals' rights and guarantee the continuation of the group. In addition, there are the moral principles taught by families, schools, and religion; workplace and factory rules; laws of civil life executed by regular police powers; and also the penalties accessible through tort claims.
To know more about criminal laws:
https://brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ4
Think about the parts of your essay. Use the drop down menus to choose what belongs in each element.
Answers
How does television portray the courtroom differently than it is in reality? Are there any other television shows you can think of besides Law & Order that provide an
inaccurate view of the courts? Are there any television shows that provide a more realistic view? If so, are there any ways in which they are still inaccurate?
Answers
Television shows often portray courtrooms in a dramatic and sensationalized manner, whereas in reality, court proceedings can be quite mundane.
What is television?Generally, Many shows depict trials as being resolved quickly, with the defendant either being found guilty or innocent within the hour. In reality, trials can last for days or even weeks.
Additionally, TV shows tend to over-emphasize the role of lawyers, while downplaying the role of judges and other court officials.
Law & Order is a TV show that provides an inaccurate view of the courts. Other shows that provide an inaccurate view of the courts include shows like "Perry Mason", "Matlock" and "Boston Legal".
Some TV shows that provide a more realistic view of the courts include "The Good Wife", "Damages", "The Practice" and "Boston Legal".
Even though these shows are more realistic, they still tend to focus more on the legal strategies and less on the procedural and administrative aspects of the court system, and also tend to make the legal proceedings more dramatic and sensationalized than in real life.
Read more about television
https://brainly.com/question/16925988
#SPJ1
The surveillance footage shows the robber brandishing a gun. The other customers in the bank were asked to hand over their cash at gunpoint and were threatened not to tell police any details about the robbery. The robber forcibly escorted a customer out of the bank as cover when he exited the building. Incoming customers caused him to let the hostage go and make a run for it. Let’s review a few concepts before you make another decision about this scene. The criminal justice decision-making flowchart does not reveal __________.
Answers
Answer:
The criminal justice decision-making flowchart does not reveal __________.
the crime victims.
Explanation:
The criminal justice system forgets the crime victim in the criminal justice decision-making flowchart. Victims and witnesses are mostly ignored. Sometimes, they are merely used to identify the offenders, who are then made to face the criminal law process. However, the victims and witnesses feel like "forgotten persons" during the whole justice process. This should not be. We know that crimes are offenses against the state, but individuals are also involved, as either victims or witnesses. Therefore, they should not be neglected. The system should cater for their needs and offer them the correct protection and psychological support.
50. If the solid yellow line is on your right, you are driving:
A.
in a safe manner
B.
on the correct side of the road
C.
on the wrong side of the road
Answers
If the solid yellow line is on your right, you're driving: A. in a secure manner
Driving is the controlled operation and movement of an automobile, such as vehicles, bikes, vans, buses, and bicycles. Permission to drive on public highways is granted based totally on a fixed of situations being met and drivers are required to observe the installed avenue and traffic legal guidelines within the region they are driving.
Definition of driving: communicating force a using wheel. b: exerting pressure on a user to have an effect. 2a: having extraordinary pressure a riding rain a driving beat. b: acting with vigor: lively a hard-using worker.
The motive of driving. riding serves many functions. At its most fundamental degree, using a motor automobile is a reliable, green, and inexpensive mode of shipping. using a vehicle may be as smooth as going for walks or strolling once you get cozy at the back of the wheel. For this, you want to practice difficult, keep in thought all the guidelines and traffic laws and familiarize yourself well with the vehicle.
Learn more about driving here: https://brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ9
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answers
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
legal costs are typically the most important component of
Answers
Legal costs are typically the most important component of the overall costs associated with legal proceedings.
These costs include attorney fees, court filing fees, expert witness fees, document production costs, and other expenses incurred during the legal process.
The significance of legal costs is particularly acute in complex litigation or dispute resolution, where the costs can quickly escalate to staggering levels. The high costs of legal proceedings can be a major deterrent for individuals and businesses seeking legal recourse, and can sometimes lead to parties abandoning or settling their claims early on in the process.
Legal costs also vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction and the complexity of the case. In some countries, the loser of a case is responsible for paying the legal fees of the prevailing party, which can create a strong incentive to avoid costly litigation.
To learn more about legal proceedings
https://brainly.com/question/5603856
#SPJ4
the department of justice mandates that all law enforcement agencies utilize the same selection process. T/F?
Answers
False.
Does the Department of Justice mandate that all law enforcement agencies utilize the same selection process?The statement is false. The Department of Justice (DOJ) does not mandate that all law enforcement agencies utilize the same selection process.
While the DOJ provides guidance and sets certain standards for law enforcement agencies, including those related to hiring practices, each agency generally has the autonomy to establish its own selection process based on their specific needs and requirements.
Different agencies may have variations in their selection methods, criteria, and procedures, reflecting the unique context and priorities of the respective jurisdiction. Therefore, there is no blanket requirement for all law enforcement agencies to follow the exact same selection process as mandated by the Department of Justice.
Learn more about Department of Justice
brainly.com/question/2704562
#SPJ11
1. Identify five similarities that you see between the rights contained in the UN document
and the fundamental rights of United States citizens from the US Bill of Rights discussed in
Lesson 3.
2. Identify five rights from the UN articles that you would like to add to a list of guarantees
under the US Constitution.
3. Are any rights that you believe should be included but that are missing from either the US
Bill of Rights or the UN Declaration of Human Rights? Give at least two to three rights.
Answers
1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.
2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.
3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.
The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.
These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.
Fundamental Rights The fundamental rights of the articles include freedom of speech, freedom of movement, right to press, right to information, right to conduct business, etc. These rights are universally applicable and contained in the documents of most of the countries and also in the UN document. US follows constitutional democracy in its governance, and it enables that the rights can be amended and revoked by the Supreme Court at any such time it may deem fit.Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.
Learn more about fundamental rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
Why would the city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes within city limits?
Answers
The city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes because:
The city council is said to be trying to stop having litigation that is brought by or as a result of visitors and residents visit. This is based on the fact that if or when they injured themselves on the town's rustic sidewalks and trails when they are wearing high-heeled shoes.
What is an ordinance?An ordinance is known to be passed due to any case of an emergency and it is one that needs a two-thirds vote of the whole governing body for passage.
The city did pass the ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes to avoid any form of litigation.
Learn more about California from
https://brainly.com/question/26015261
Why does it make sense to speak of a "double trial" in
American courts?
Answers
The phrase "double trial" in American courts refers to the possibility of two trials for a single criminal offense.
The first is the criminal trial, in which the state seeks to prove that the defendant committed the crime in question. The second is the civil trial, in which the victim or victim's family seeks damages from the defendant. This double trial makes sense because criminal and civil trials serve different purposes and have different standards of proof.A criminal trial is used to determine whether someone has committed a crime and to impose penalties, such as fines, imprisonment, or death, on those found guilty.
A prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, meaning that the evidence must be convincing enough that no reasonable person would doubt the defendant's guilt. This is a high standard of proof that reflects the seriousness of criminal convictions and the state's obligation to prove guilt before punishing someone.A civil trial, on the other hand, is used to determine whether one person or entity is responsible for another person's damages and to award compensation, such as money, to the victim or victim's family.
The plaintiff, or victim, must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that it is more likely than not that the defendant is responsible for the damages. This is a lower standard of proof than in a criminal trial, reflecting the different goals of civil and criminal proceedings.The double trial makes sense because a person can be acquitted of a crime in a criminal trial but still be held responsible for damages in a civil trial.
For example, in the O.J. Simpson case, Simpson was acquitted of murder in his criminal trial but was found responsible for the deaths of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson in a civil trial and was ordered to pay damages to their families. This illustrates how criminal and civil trials serve different purposes and why it makes sense to have both in certain cases.
To know more about criminal visit :
brainly.com/question/31658194
#SPJ11
The state tax incentive is an example of":
Answers
Answer:
mortgage interest deduction
can a 14 year old have a fishing license in Kentucky
Answers
Answer : Resident and nonresident children under the age of 16 are allowed to fish without a license .
Hoped I helped-
P.S - You might want to double check though -
Sleepy~
List two requirements to become a state supreme court judge
Answers
Answer:
NONE
There are no explicit requirements in the U.S. Constitution for a person to be nominated to become a Supreme Court justice. No age, education, job experience, or citizenship rules exist. In fact, according to the Constitution, a Supreme Court justice does not need to even have a law degree.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Pls mark brainliest :}
And have an amazing day <3
The claims made by White and Hahn about United States policies toward American Indians in the late nineteenth century are similar in that they both support which of the following arguments?
A
The federal government sought to grant members of American Indian tribes United States citizenship.
B
The United States Congress saw treaties as the best way to promote American Indian economic development.
C
Federal officials desired to encourage the adoption of White American lifestyles by American Indians.
Answers
The claims made by White and Hahn about U.S policies toward American Indians are similar in that they both support the federal officials desired to encourage the adoption of the White American lifestyles by American Indians.
The White and Hahn have their own claims, White claims that the reservations tend to reduced American Indian autonomy from the United States, while the Hahn tends to claim the reservations which could be used to resist federal encroachment.
However, both the White and the Hahn tends to support the federal officials which are in desired to encourage the adoption of the White American lifestyles.
Hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about the federal officials here:
https://brainly.com/question/22813814
#SPJ4
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answers
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
When can a private prosecutor prosecute a case even in the absence of a public prosecutor?
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Once authorized to prosecute the offence, a private prosecutor must continue to prosecute the case until the end of the trial, even if the authority has been revoked or otherwise withdrawn. Anyone may conduct the prosecution, either personally or through a pleader.
For a trial waiting in a Magistrate Court, the victim/complainant or his lawyer may conduct prosecution if the Magistrate Court allows it. If such permission is provided, the prosecution is going to be conducted entirely by the victim and his lawyer. This can occur even in cases instituted in the basis of a charge sheet filed by police; however, the limitation is that the case must be triable by a Magistrate (rather than a Sessions Court) and the Magistrate must permit it.
Thus, once authorized to prosecute the offence, a private prosecutor must continue to prosecute the case until the end of the trial, even if the authority has been revoked or otherwise withdrawn.
Learn more about prosecutor, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ2