These factors contribute directly to the benefits of incumbency.
Why does a sitting representative, particularly in the House, have such a benefit over a challenger?The term "incumbent" refers to a person who currently occupies a specific set of duties inside an office within a business or within a branch of the government. A government representative who is still in office is known as an incumbent.
The incumbent typically has the upper hand over his opponent because he benefits from name recognition, casework, campaign finance, and typically redistricting. Due to the many advantages that incumbency offers, incumbents enjoy a significant advantage in congressional elections. A few of these include the capacity to take credit for legislative accomplishments, offer pork-barrel legislation, serve constituents, and gain notoriety.
To learn more about incumbent, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29507346
#SPJ1
The Mann-Elkins Act of 1910 extended the power of the Interstate Commerce Commission over which of the following industries? [Choose all that apply]
telegraph
telephone
railroads
The Mann-Elkins Act of 1910 extended the power of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) over the railroad industry.
The Mann-Elkins Act was passed to strengthen the ICC's regulatory authority over the railroads by giving the commission the power to set rates and to regulate the practices of the railroads. The act also extended the ICC's jurisdiction to include telephone and telegraph companies, which were considered to be closely related to the railroads and were therefore subject to the same regulations.
The Mann-Elkins Act was an important step in the federal government's efforts to regulate the railroads and other industries in the early 20th century. It provided the ICC with greater authority to protect the public from discriminatory and monopolistic practices by the railroads, and it helped to ensure that the railroads would operate in the public interest.
So the correct answers are:
railroads
telephone
telegraph
Necesito 3 ejemplos de objetos de actos juridicos ejemplo de un acto celebrado por escritura publica/intervencion de oficial publico y otro por instrumento privado
Answer:
i don't understind
Explanation:
Which of the following is unnecessary in the successful litigation of an action arising from a negligent tortious act?
Question 4 options:
A)
A prima facie harmful act
B)
A standard of care
C)
Reasonable care
D)
An intentional harmful act
The correct answer is (D)
An intentionally harmful act. The intentionally harmful act is unnecessary for successful litigation of an action arising from a negligent tortious act.
A prima facie harmful act refers to an act that, on its face, appears to be harmful, which is necessary to establish a claim.
A standard of care is the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise in a similar situation, which is necessary to determine if there was a breach of duty.
Reasonable care refers to the level of care a person should exercise to avoid causing harm to others, which is necessary to establish negligence.
However, an intentionally harmful act is not required to prove negligence, as negligence focuses on the lack of reasonable care rather than intentional harm.
To know more about Negligent tortious acts, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12372677
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of self-incrimination?
Select all that apply.
A. An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.
B. The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
C. Two teenagers arrested for breaking into a house for sale confirmed that they had walked by the house several times and were curious about what had been left inside after the owners moved away, but they had never satisfied their curiosity.
D. A suspect in an auto theft said that he had had always feared being accused of stealing a car after a detective told him he looked like a car thief.
Answer:
B C & D
Explanation:
All of the suspects told the officers evidence that pointed mostly at them for the culprit but didn't confess
Answer:
A- The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
D- An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.
Types of jurisdiction include which of the following?
In personam
In rem
Subject matter
Original and appellate
All of these choices are correct.
Answer:
All of these choices are correct.
Explanation:
- In Personam Jurisdiction
In personam jurisdiction (or personal jurisdiction) refers to courts' authority over particular entities, and their liabilities & rights.
- In Rem Jurisdiction
In rem jurisdiction refers to courts' authority over property within a county, district, or state.
- Original and Appellate Jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review a case, and appellate jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review decisions adjudicated by lower courts.
please explain it HELP HELP HELP
A criminal code is a written compilation of the majority of the criminal laws in a certain jurisdiction. A criminal code will include the offences that are legal in the jurisdiction, potential punishments, and certain general regulations.
What is penal code, NAPOLCOM and PNP?
The National Police Commission is the body tasked with overseeing and managing the Philippine National Police in accordance with the 1987 Constitution and the Major Police Reform Laws, Republic Act Nos. 6975 and 8551. The Indian Criminal Code is broken into 511 sections spread across 23 chapters.
The Indian Criminal Code's main goals are to define good and wrong as well as the consequences of doing something illegal. The "intention" of committing the crime is a critical factor in criminal law for determining the offense's potential punishment. The Philippine National Police is administered and controlled by the National Police Commission, often known as NAPOLCOM, an affiliated agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government.
Learn more about penal code:
https://brainly.com/question/10282902
#SPJ1
Lily has suffered severe injuries from a car accident. She would like to sue for compensation, but does not have enough funds on hand to retain an attorney on her own. What is the best type of fee arrangement for lily?.
The contingency fee is the best type of fee arrangement for lily.
What is a contingency fee?Contingent fees, often called contingency fees or conditional fees, are any fees for services provided that are only paid if a favorable outcome occurs. Despite the fact that this allegation can be used in a variety of professions, it is most usually associated with the practice of law.
A contingent fee is a cost associated with legal services that are only charged if a lawsuit is won or a favorable settlement is reached. Contingent fees are sometimes represented as a percentage of the settlement amount that the client receives.
Contingent fees may make it easier for people with less financial resources to seek their civil rights because one must be wealthy enough to start such litigation in the first place in order to sue someone for a tort. Although there are risks involved with taking cases on a contingency basis, attorneys won't do so unless they believe there is merit to the case.
To know more about contingency fees visit:- brainly.com/question/13447810
#SPJ4
Myron Effriham is out of money. However, he will be paid in two days. Myron knows that he can cash a personal check with his employer at any time. He also has figured out that if he folds the check he’s about to write many times and wets the crease over the electronic coding, the automatic check-routing machines will kick it out to be handled manually. Manual handling will cause at least another day’s delay before the check gets to his bank. Therefore, he could cash a check late today and, in effect, use his employer’s money to live on until payday. Is this ethical? Would anyone be injured by Myron’s action? Is it illegal?
This is not ethical, he should ask for their help instead of just taking it. No one would be injured and everyone would probably be okay. It is illegal because he would use his employers money to live on until payday and its not his money.
Myron's actions are not ethical, could harm his employer, and are illegal. It would be wiser for him to seek alternative means of financial assistance rather than resorting to deceitful tactics.
What is ethics?The study of ethics, often known as moral philosophy, "involves systematizing, defending, and endorsing conceptions of good and bad action,".
Axiology is a subfield of philosophy that consists of the fields of ethics and aesthetics. These fields are concerned with issues of value.
With the definition of terms like good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime, ethics aims to answer concerns about human morality.
The theoretical significance and context of moral claims, as well as how to assess their veracity, is the subject of meta-ethics. Normative ethics, which is concerned with the methods used in practice to choose a moral path of conduct.
Applied ethics, which deals with what a person has a responsibility to do in a particular circumstance or area of activity.
Learn more about ethics, here
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ3
the element 213/85 at decays to 209/83 bi. use the laws of conservation of charge and nucleon number to determine the decay particle emitted. explain your reasoning. (2 points)
A neutron must be converted into a proton in some way. Since a proton has a charge of +1 and a neutron is electrically neutral, the decay process must involve the emission of a particle with a charge of -1. Furthermore, a nucleon cannot be it. the element is the most basic particle that satisfies these restrictions.
Since thorium has an atomic value of 85, all of its isotopes have 85 protons. The isotope in question has the element 213 nucleons, which means that 213 - 85 = 128neutrons. Protactinium has 83 protons since it has an atomic number of 83. Nucleon 209 also appears in the product of the Th 209 decay, which is Pa 209. We do, in fact, have nucleon number conservation for this decay. Consequently, how do we go from having 128 neutrons and 85 protons to having 126 neutrons and 83 protons? A neutron must be converted into a proton in some way. Since a proton has a charge of +1 and a neutron is electrically neutral, the decay process must involve the emission of a particle with a charge of -1. Furthermore, a nucleon cannot be it. An electron is the most basic particle that satisfies these restrictions.
Learn more about element from
brainly.com/question/18096867
#SPJ4
How many police zones does Port Orange FL have?
Answer:
the ans is six divisions
"defectors were spies in their own country, but they have abandoned their homeland to become agents for a foreign government." which type of evidence does the author use to support this claim?
He assumed leadership of the administration in 1941 while continuing to serve in the military.
The right response is C. A nation mobilizes its entire populace to launch a total war strategy. General of the Imperial Japanese Army and politician Hideki Tojo. He vigorously backed Japanese imperial expansion in Asia and the Pacific and was a committed patriot to the emperor. Additionally, he supported an alliance with the Axis Powers and a declaration of war against the United States. He assumed leadership of the administration in 1941 while continuing to serve in the military. He thereby acquired absolute authority and control over the Japanese military. He was responsible for the attack on Pearl Harbor, as well as the horrific murder and war crimes that were committed.
Learn more about Military here:
https://brainly.com/question/29397446
#SPJ4
which group led the charge of the change to incarceration instead of corporal punishment
Answer:
The prison population began to grow in the 1970s, when politicians from both parties used fear and thinly veiled racial rhetoric to push increasingly punitive policies.
Explanation:
The way to the house ?
Answer:
what is the house in question
Explanation:
do yo have a screen shot
which of the following conclusions is most supported by the data in the chart? responses the voting rights act of 1965 has significantly reduced disparities in voter registration between whites and african americans. the voting rights act of 1965 has significantly reduced disparities in voter registration between whites and african americans. the gap in voter registration rates is due to a political realignment beginning in 1965 that shifted many voters in the south away from the republican party and into the democratic party.
The disparity between Whites and African Americans in voter registration has dramatically decreased since the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
How was prejudice in places where people could vote curbed by the Voting Rights Act of 1965?By outlawing poll taxes, literacy tests, and other practices that effectively disenfranchised African Americans from voting, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 reduced obstacles to black enfranchisement in the South. Segregationists made an effort to thwart the local implementation of federal civil rights legislation.
Which of the following has a vote-casting right when a company's board of directors is elected?The ability to cast your shares in company elections is one of your important rights as a shareholder.
To know more about voter visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28341923
#SPJ4
Suppose that lenny lawyer enters into an agreement with cindy client that his fee will be a percentage of the recovery lenny obtains for cindy in her pending divorce. State law makes such a contingency fee arrangement illegal in divorce actions. What will be the probable outcome if lenny attempts to enforce the agreement?.
The agreement will be void for breaking a law. Lenny won't be able to get anything back.
What is state law?The body of law in a particular state is known as state law. It is made up of the state's charter, laws, rules, and common law. In the United States, the state legislature passes, and the governor signs into law individual state laws. State law and federal law coexist.
Federal law supersedes state law when there is a conflict, as stated in Article IV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. To make the laws on various subjects uniform across the states, individual states have adopted uniform laws. the Uniform Commercial Code, as an illustration.
Learn more about state law with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
What type of crime shows one of the most serious trends as people live longer, and involves an increased number of professionals in the field who are willing to risk client harm in fraudulent schemes?
White collar crime involves an increased number of professionals in the
field who are willing to risk client harm in fraudulent schemes.
This type of crime is divided into groups which are occupational and
corporate crime. White collar crime mostly involves embezzlement of funds.
This is usually carried out by the professionals in that field.
The white collar crime are usually willing to risk client harm in fraudulent
schemes for their personal gains and is mostly carried out by men than
women as it is easier to convince people it is legit as a man than a woman.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/19320562
What is the purpose of cross-examination during a trial?
O A. To convince the judge to deliver a verdict immediately
B. To summarize each side's arguments to the jury
C. To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious
D. To give the jury a firsthand account of an incident
C. To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious.
Cross-examination is used during a trial to test the witness's credibility and to create doubt.
Answer:
To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious
Explanation:
Part of analyzing a political cartoon is deciding whether or not you agree with its message. What is the BEST reason to include this in your analysis?
A.
The artist is attempting to persuade you to like his art.
B.
The artist is attempting to provoke humor about a political topic.
C.
The artist is attempting to provoke thought about a political topic.
D.
The artist is attempting to gain readers in many newspapers.
Answer:
The artist is attempting to provoke thought about a political topic.
Answer:
C
Explanation: Already did it and got it correct.
During a trial in Gene's suit against Homer over the use of Gene's lakeside cabin, Gene's attorney asks questions of Homer's witness, Illya, after questioning by Homer's attorney. This is
Gene's attorney will likely ask Illya a series of questions designed to undermine or discredit Homer's claims or show that Gene has a better legal argument than Homer has.
Depending on the specific facts of the case, this could include asking Illya to provide more information about what happened when Homer used the cabin, whether Gene had ever given Homer permission to use it, or if Illya knows of any other instance when Homer used the cabin without Gene's permission.
Additionally, Gene's attorney may ask Illya to clarify any aspects of the case that Homer's attorney has raised or to challenge any of Homer's statements that are in dispute. If Illya’s testimony is helpful to Gene’s cause, the attorney may also ask Ignya to confirm or expand upon the facts in Gene’s favor. Depending on the evidence and the legal strategy of both parties, the attorney may also lead Ignya into testifying to opposing versions of events or interpret things in ways to make them appear different to the court.
To know more about Homer , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29775289
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not a function of the Federal Trade Commission?
Joan is a white-collar offender. She has been convicted of embezzlement and given a prison sentence. In terms of security levels, which type of prison should Joan be sent to
Answer:
Minimum security prisons. These violators are not at risk of violence therefore the security is comparatively low in terms of security than others.
Explanation:
Which of the following are local issues that escalated into national issues? how much time working parents need to have to care for their children not having anyone to take care of a new child in the family
how often trash pick-up should occur
not having rules or regulations set for using dog parks
how many people should be elected to the city council
Answer:
no idea. b
Explanation:
sorry i dont no
Source documents, such as a canceled check, should be kept on file for _______. Multiple Choice The Balance Sheet preparation Profit and Loss statement Tax purposes None of the choices are correct
Source documents, such as a canceled check, should be kept on file for tax purposes.
Source documents are any documents that provide evidence of a transaction or event. These may include canceled checks, bank statements, invoices, receipts, and other financial records.
By keeping these documents on file, taxpayers can demonstrate that they have accurately reported their income and deductions on their tax returns.
Canceled checks, in particular, are important source documents because they provide evidence of payment. When a check is canceled, it means that the payment has been processed and funds have been transferred from one account to another.
By keeping canceled checks on file, taxpayers can show that they have made payments for deductible expenses, such as business expenses or charitable donations.
In general, it is recommended that taxpayers keep source documents on file for at least three years from the date the tax return was filed or the due date of the tax return, whichever is later. This is because the IRS generally has three years from the date a return was filed to initiate an audit or assess additional tax.
Overall, keeping source documents, such as canceled checks, on file is an important part of tax record-keeping. These documents serve as proof of transactions and provide evidence to support deductions and credits on tax returns.
By keeping accurate records and retaining source documents, taxpayers can minimize their risk of an IRS audit and ensure that they are prepared in the event of an audit.
To learn more about source documents, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/207486
#SPJ11
which statement best describes the difference between science and philosophy?
OA
Philosophers study human behavior whereas scientists study the natural world.
B.
Science is based on facts whereas philosophy deals with opinions.
Philosophers apply logical reasoning whereas scientists do not.
D.
Scientists gather and analyze empirical data whereas philosophers do not.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
science is based on proven philosophies while philosophies ain't proven
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
A jury has determined that Jason Fruitt, CPA, is 20% at fault for losses suffered by investors who relied on materially misstated financial statements. The jury found that Fruitt’s co-defendants, the client company and the company’s CEO, are each 40% at fault. The company is bankrupt, and only Pruitt and the CEO have adequate resources to pay damages.
Under joint and several liability, what is the likely percentage of damages that Fruitt will pay?
a.
20% plus a proportionate share of damages attributed to the company.
b.
20% plus 50% of damages attributed to the company.
c.
20%.
d.
100% of damages.
Under joint and several liability, the likely percentage of damages that Jason Fruitt, CPA, will pay in the given scenario is 20%. So, option C is accurate.
Joint and several liability allows for the apportionment of liability among multiple defendants in a legal case. In this case, the jury has determined that Fruitt is 20% at fault for the losses suffered by investors, while the client company and the company's CEO are each 40% at fault.
Under joint and several liability, Fruitt is responsible for paying his proportionate share of damages, which is determined as 20% based on the jury's determination of fault. Fruitt is not liable for the portion attributed to the company, as joint and several liability does not require each defendant to pay for the full extent of the damages caused by all parties involved.
Therefore, Fruitt will likely be liable to pay 20% of the damages suffered by the investors.
To know more about joint and several liability
brainly.com/question/28260185
#SPJ11
The Probable Cause Panel of FREC acts as a grand jury. They determine if there is a law violation or not and they recommend whether to take further action or dismiss the case to the FREC. How long does the Probable Cause Panel have to determine whether the case should go forward?
Answer:
30 days.
Explanation:
FREC means "Florida Real Estate Commission." It was created to protect the public through education and regulation of real estate licensees. The Commission consists of seven members appointed by the Governor, subject to confirmation by the Senate.
The Probable Cause Panel of FREC is given 30 days from the receipt of the final investigative report to make a probable cause determination.
The Panel is usually composed of two current members or one current and one former member of the FREC, appointed by the Commission's chairperson, with one of the members being a professional member.
Investments can make businesses more productive by:
O A. allowing them to ignore the limits of production possibilities
curves.
B. increasing the amount of input needed to create a certain output.
C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
D. removing most opportunity costs for making economic choices.
Answer: C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
Explanation:
I just took the quiz, C is correct! :)
It is possible to amend (or change) a bill in committee or on the floor during debate.
a. True
b. False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Senators may debate each amendment without limit unless the Senate (1) agrees to a motion ... the text of the bill; a second-degree amendment proposes to change the text of a first-degree The Senate then acts on the committee amendments, after amendment is numbered at the time it is offered and read on the floor.