It cost Irene $58.90 to fill her car's gas tank with 15 and 1 /2 gallons of gas. So what are all the rates that are equivalent to $58.90 for 15 and 1/2 gallons of gas

To solve the recurrence relation aₙ = (n+1)aₙ₋₁, we can use iteration to find some terms of the sequence and then look for a pattern.

a₁ = 2a₀ = 2(7) = 14

a₂ = 3a₁ = 3(14) = 42

a₃ = 4a₂ = 4(42) = 168

From these calculations, we might guess that aₙ = (n+1)! * 7 for n ≥ 0. We can prove this by induction.

Base case: a₀ = 7 = (0+1)! * 7 is true.

Inductive step:

Assume that aₙ = (n+1)! * 7 for some arbitrary n ≥ 0.

We want to show that aₙ₊₁ = ((n+1)+1)! * 7.

Using the recurrence relation, we have:

aₙ₊₁ = (n+2)aₙ = (n+2)(n+1)! * 7 = (n+2)! * 7

Therefore, aₙ₊₁ satisfies the formula ((n+1)+1)! * 7, completing the inductive step.

By induction, we have shown that aₙ = (n+1)! * 7 for n ≥ 0. This is the closed-form formula for the given recurrence relation.

Learn more about  recurrence relation, from

https://brainly.com/question/4082048

#SPJ11

We can conclude that the socioeconomic class of the offender is related to the likelihood of arrests.

Based on the information provided, we can conclude that there is a significant relationship between arrests and the socioeconomic class of the offender.
Identify the chi-square critical score: 9.488

Identify the chi-square test statistic: 12.2
Compare the test statistic to the critical score:

If the test statistic (12.2) is greater than the critical score (9.488), then there is a significant relationship between the variables.
In this case, 12.2 > 9.488, so there is a significant relationship between arrests and the socioeconomic class of the offender.
For similar question on socioeconomic.

https://brainly.com/question/31093929  

#SPJ11

Each Bonferroni confidence interval will have an individual confidence level of 22.5%. T

To calculate the individual confidence level for each Bonferroni confidence interval, we need to use the Bonferroni correction formula:

Individual Confidence Level = Family-wise Confidence Level / Number of Comparisons

In this case, we are making 4 Bonferroni confidence intervals with a family-wise confidence level of 90%. Therefore, the individual confidence level for each Bonferroni confidence interval can be calculated as:

Individual Confidence Level = 0.9 / 4

Individual Confidence Level = 0.225 or 22.5%

So each Bonferroni confidence interval will have an individual confidence level of 22.5%. This means that we can be 90% confident that all four intervals together contain the true population parameters, and we can be 22.5% confident that each individual interval contains the true population parameter.

Learn more about confidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/16807970

#SPJ11

Answer:

Probability of rolling- 5/6

Probability of stopping at a pink sector-1/6

Probability of both- 4/6

Answer:

Probability of rolling- 5/6

Probability of stopping at a pink sector-1/6

Probability of both- 4/6

Step-by-step explanation:

The residual for State 13 is -14.6. A negative residual means that the observed value is less than the predicted value, indicating that State 13 had a lower percentage of children in poverty in 1991 than what would be expected based on its percentage in 1985.

Part A: To determine the LSRL (least squares regression line), we need to find the equation of the line that best fits the scatter plot of the data. We can use a statistical software or calculator to do this, but here's how to do it manually using a TI-84 calculator:

Enter the data into two lists (L1 for 1985 and L2 for 1991).

Go to "STAT" > "CALC" > "LinReg(ax+b)".

Make sure "L1" and "L2" are selected as the Xlist and Ylist, respectively.

Press "ENTER" twice to get the equation of the line.

The equation of the LSRL is:

y = 0.8551x + 9.7436

where y represents the percent of children in poverty in 1991 and x represents the percent of children in poverty in 1985.

To interpret the LSRL, we note that the slope is positive (0.8551), which means that there is a positive association between the percentage of children in poverty in 1985 and 1991. In other words, states with higher poverty rates in 1985 tended to have higher poverty rates in 1991. The y-intercept is 9.7436, which represents the predicted percent of children in poverty in 1991 when the percent in 1985 is 0. However, since it doesn't make sense for the percent in 1985 to be 0, the intercept isn't meaningful in this context.

Part B:

To predict the percentage of children living in poverty in 1991 for State 13 if the percentage in 1985 was 19.5%, we can use the LSRL equation:

y = 0.8551x + 9.7436

where x is the percent of children in poverty in 1985 and y is the predicted percent in 1991.

Substituting x = 19.5, we get:

y = 0.8551(19.5) + 9.7436 ≈ 27.4

Therefore, the predicted percentage of children living in poverty in 1991 for State 13 is approximately 27.4%.

Part C:

To calculate the residual for State 13 if the observed percent of poverty in 1991 was 22.7%, we first use the LSRL equation to find the predicted value for State 13:

y = 0.8551x + 9.7436

Substituting x = 30.8 (the percent of children in poverty in State 13 in 1985), we get:

y = 0.8551(30.8) + 9.7436 ≈ 37.3

The predicted percent of children in poverty in 1991 for State 13 is approximately 37.3%.

Next, we calculate the residual as the difference between the observed value (22.7%) and the predicted value (37.3%):

residual = observed value - predicted value

= 22.7 - 37.3

= -14.6

Therefore, the residual for State 13 is -14.6. A negative residual means that the observed value is less than the predicted value, indicating that State 13 had a lower percentage of children in poverty in 1991 than what would be expected based on its percentage in 1985.

Learn more about predicted value,  from

https://brainly.com/question/24305645

#SPJ11

Answer:

Knowing what x equals helps you completely solve the equation, because wherever theres an x, you can replace with a 6.  So once you do the equation i did below, you can figure out that 47 is not greater than 47.

Step-by-step explanation:

7(6) + 5 = 2(6) + 35

42 + 5 = 12 + 35

47 = 47

Therfore knowing what x equals helps you solve the equation.

Answer:

cejr

Step-by-step explanation:

cec

Answer

its the third one.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The circle is the radius divided by equal, so it is the same as the other section meaning 16 as well

Step-by-step explanation:

Add the two ends to the result 32

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

yea what she said

F distribution is used with the global test of the regression model to reject the null hypothesis.

The hypothesis test will be conducted using a novel distribution. After the English statistician Sir Ronald Fisher, it is known as the F distribution. A ratio, the F statistic is (a fraction). One set of degrees of freedom is for the denominator, and the other set is for the numerator.

According to the null hypothesis, all group population means are equal. Because it is assumed that the populations are normal and that they have similar variances, the equal means hypothesis indicates that the populations have the same normal distribution. All groups are samples from populations with the same normal distribution, according to the null hypothesis. According to the alternative theory, at least two of the sample groups are drawn from populations with various normal distributions.

To learn more about the null hypothesis, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29588905

#SPJ4

When a plane intersects a double-napped cone only at the cone's vertex, the degenerate conic section that is formed is called a point.

In this case, the plane does not cut through the cone's surface, so it does not create any other conic sections such as an ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola. The intersection is simply the single point at the vertex of the cone. A double-napped cone is a 3-dimensional geometric shape that looks like two cones joined at their bases, pointing in opposite directions. When a plane intersects a double-napped cone, it can create various types of conic sections, such as circles, ellipses, parabolas, or hyperbolas, depending on the angle and position of the plane relative to the cone.

However, if the plane intersects the cone only at the vertex, which is the point where the two cones meet, then the resulting conic section is a degenerate one, specifically a point. This is because the plane cuts through both cones at their narrowest point, where they converge to a single point, and does not intersect any other part of the cones. Therefore, the intersection between the plane and the double-napped cone is just a single point, which is the degenerate conic section formed in this case.

To know more about conic section visit -

brainly.com/question/10071979

#SPJ11

Complete question:

A plane intersects a double-napped cone only at the cone's vertex. Which terms describe the degenerate conic section that is formed?

Select each correct answer.

Answer:

It should be neither

Step-by-step explanation:

x+7>12

x>12-7

x>5

Its not 3 or 4.. its 5 so its neither of 3 and 4..

Answer:

1: The highest score is 98, the lowest score is 74.

2: 55% of the scores are greater than 84

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution 1-1:

Starting from the top left and going from left to right row by row we compare the largest number we come across with the current number we are inspecting.

Starting with 92 then we look at 88, 92 is greater than 88 so we keep 92, next is 95, 95 is greater than 92 so we keep 95, next is 74, 95 is greater than 74 so we keep 95 and so on until we have compared all of the numbers. We are left with 98

Solution 1-2:

Using a similar method to finding the greatest number we go through the list of numbers in search of the smallest number. Starting with 92 we then look at 88, 88 is less than 92 so we keep 88. Next is 95, 88 is less than 95 so we keep 88. Then 74, 74 is less than 88 so we keep 74 and so on. We are left with 74

Solution 2:

There is a total of 20 numbers in the table. By comparing the numbers in the table to 84, we can determine that 11 numbers are greater than 84.

By dividing 11 by 20 we get 0.55 which is equal to 55%

Answer: It already tells you what DE= 60

Step-by-step explanation:

Since F is the midpoint of DE that means DF=FE

So create equation \(2x+6+2x+6=4x+12\)

When DF and FE is added your answer should equal DE

So you write the equation \(4x+12=2x+36\) to find x and once x is found substitute your answer for x

\(4x+12(-12)=2x+36(-12)\) subtract 12 on both sides 36-12= 24

\(4x=2x+24\) subtract 2x on both sides 4x-2x=2x

\(2x=24\) divide 2 into both sides 24/2=12 x=12

\(4(12)+12=2(12)+36\)  

4x12=48+12=60   2x12=24+36=60

Answer: 64.80% not 100% positive if i did that math right but thats what i got

Step-by-step explanation:

38.8679

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

56 sets of pictures she can post on her wall

It is given that alyssa's favorite tennis team has 8 players on them. She has taken a picture with every single athlete individually and wants to post some of the pictures on her wall. But she only wants to post 3 pictures on her wall.

For this we hve to use factorials. In mathematics, the factorial of a non-negative integer n, denoted by n!, is the product of all positive integers less than or equal to n. The factorial of n also equals the product of n with the next smaller factorial: For example, The value of 0! is 1, according to the convention for an empty product.

So it will be - \(\frac{8!}{3!(8-3)!}\) as this is the formula for combination

This will be 56.

Thus, 56 sets of pictures she can post on her wall

To find the estimated probability that it will take at least five patients to find one patient on whom the medicine would not be effective, we need to find the probability of getting NNNNN as the first five patients. Since the success rate is 0.3 and the failure rate is 0.7, the probability of getting NNNNN is:

0.7 x 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.7 = 0.16807

Therefore, the estimated probability that it will take at least five patients to find one patient on whom the medicine would not be effective is 0.16807.

To find the estimated probability that the medicine will be effective on exactly three out of four randomly selected patients, we need to count the number of ways we can select three patients out of four and multiply it by the probability of getting EEE and NEEE for the selected patients and non-selected patients, respectively. The number of ways to select three patients out of four is:

4C3 = 4

The probability of getting EEE and NEEE for the selected patients and non-selected patients, respectively, is:

(0.7)^3 x (0.3) x (0.7) = 0.1029

Therefore, the estimated probability that the medicine will be effective on exactly three out of four randomly selected patients is 4 x 0.1029 = 0.4116 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

To know more about probability refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Final price f = 0.85x

Step-by-step explanation:

Let f represent the final price and

x is the original price of the lawn mower

Given;

The hardware store is having a 15% off sale on lawn mowers this weekend;

the final sales price,excluding tax will be equal to the original price minus 15% of the original price.

Final price f = 100% of x - 15% of x

Final price f = x - 0.15x

Final price f = 0.85x

Answer:

WHAT IS THE ANSWER?

Step-by-step explanation:

help mehhh

The rule of depreciation function for the machine is f(x) = 146600 - (146600 - 55320) * (x / 8). The machine will be worth approximately $89,521.88 after 5 years.

The rule of depreciation function for the machine can be determined by using the formula for linear depreciation. Linear depreciation assumes that the value of the machine decreases evenly over time. The formula for linear depreciation is:

f(x) = V - (V - S) * (x / n)

Where:

f(x) is the value of the machine at a given time x

V is the initial value of the machine (in this case, $146,600)

S is the scrap value of the machine (in this case, $55,320)

x is the time period in years

n is the total depreciation period in years (in this case, 8 years)

Therefore, the rule of depreciation function for this machine would be:

f(x) = 146600 - (146600 - 55320) * (x / 8)

The domain of the depreciation function represents the valid input values for the time period x. In this case, the machine will be depreciated over an 8-year period. Therefore, the domain of the function is the set of real numbers from 0 to 8, inclusive.

To determine the value of the machine after 5 years, we can substitute x = 5 into the depreciation function:

f(5) = 146600 - (146600 - 55320) * (5 / 8)

Simplifying the equation, we get:

f(5) = 146600 - 91325 * (5 / 8)

     = 146600 - 57078.125

     ≈ $89521.88

Therefore, the machine will be worth approximately $89,521.88 after 5 years.

In summary, the rule of depreciation function for the machine is f(x) = 146600 - (146600 - 55320) * (x / 8). The domain of the function is the set of real numbers from 0 to 8, inclusive. The machine will be worth approximately $89,521.88 after 5 years.

To learn more about linear depreciation click here: brainly.com/question/29257688

#SPJ11

The circulation of F around C is -16. No, F is not equal to V f for some function f. The flux of F across C is -8. No, F is not equal to V x G for any vector field G.

(a) The circulation of F around C is -16.

Using Green's Theorem, we can write the circulation of F as the line integral around the boundary of D:

∮CF · dr = ∬D (∂Q/∂x - ∂P/∂y) dA

where P = 9x + 5y, Q = 2x - 7y, and dr = dx i + dy j.

Taking the partial derivatives, we get:

∂Q/∂x - ∂P/∂y = 2 - 9 = -7.

Thus, the circulation of F around C is:

∮CF · dr = ∬D -7 dA = -7(area of D) = -16.

(b) No, F is not equal to V f for some function f.

If F were equal to the gradient of some scalar function f, then the circulation of F around any closed path would be zero. However, we just calculated that the circulation of F around C is -16, which means F cannot be expressed as the gradient of any scalar function.

(c) The flux of F across C is -8.

Using Green's Theorem, we can write the flux of F across C as the line integral around the boundary of D:

∮CF · ds = ∬D (∂P/∂x + ∂Q/∂y) dA

Taking the partial derivatives, we get:

∂P/∂x + ∂Q/∂y = 9 - 7 = 2.

Thus, the flux of F across C is:

∮CF · ds = ∬D 2 dA = 2(area of D) = -8.

(d) No, F is not equal to V x G for any vector field G.

If F were equal to the curl of some vector field G, then the flux of F across any closed surface would be zero. However, we just calculated that the flux of F across C is -8, which means F cannot be expressed as the curl of any vector field.

Learn more about flux here

https://brainly.com/question/26289097

#SPJ11

Answer:

20

Hope this helps! Please mark Brainliest!

Answer:20

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps.

Answer:

2/25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2/25

Step-by-step explanation:

plzzz mark me brainliest :}

Answer: A. 7

Step-by-step explanation:
G<----?---->H<--3-->I
<-----------10----------->
This rough diagram suggests you can find GH by subtracting the length of GI by HI so,
10-3=7

The question that is best answered using a parametric design is: "Does one level of the independent variable result in an increase/decrease in levels of behavior when compared to another level of that independent variable, for given participants?"

A parametric design is characterized by manipulating and comparing different levels or conditions of an independent variable. It aims to determine whether there are significant differences between these levels in terms of the dependent variable. The design typically involves controlling extraneous variables and randomizing the assignment of participants to different conditions.

The question mentioned above aligns with the purpose of a parametric design as it seeks to compare the effects of different levels of the independent variable on behavior. By manipulating and systematically varying the independent variable while holding other factors constant, researchers can assess the impact of different conditions and determine if there are statistically significant differences in behavior between them.

The other answer choices provided do not explicitly involve comparing different levels or conditions of the independent variable, which is a key characteristic of a parametric design.

Therefore, the question that is best answered using a parametric design is: "Does one level of the independent variable result in an increase/decrease in levels of behavior when compared to another level of that independent variable, for given participants?"

Learn more about parametric design on:

https://brainly.com/question/21043663

#SPJ4

Equation f(x) = x² + 6x + 16 represents the quadratic function, and the table provides various instances of the quadratic function. Hence, the A, C, and E proposition are true.

What are some examples of quadratic functions?

f(x) = ax² + bx + c, in which a, b, and c are integers and an is not equal to zero, is a quadratic function. The diagram for a quadratic function has the form of an arc.

What method of solving quadratic equations is the simplest?

There are three main methods for resolving quadratic equations: factoring, the cubic formula, and completing the square. to solve a quadratic issue via factoring.

The y- intercept of f(x) is f(0) = 16, while the y-intercept of g(x) is g(0) = 8. Therefore, statement A is true.

The  x-coordinate of the vertex of f(x) is given by -b/2a = -6/(2 x 1) = -3 , which is less than the x-coordinate of the vertex of g(x), which is 1. Therefore, statement C is true.

The y-coordinate of the vertex of f(x) is given by f(-b/2a) = f(-3) = (-3)² + 6(-3) + 16 = 1, while the y-coordinate of the vertex of g(x) is 5. Therefore, statement E is true.

To know more about quadratic function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18958913

#SPJ1

Answer: *scared*

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

She bought 5 pounds.

Step-by-step explanation:

if she spent 10 dollars and its 2 dollars per pound that means that you have to divide 10 by 2 in order to get how many pounds you can buy for 10 dollars.

If you think about it if you want 2 pounds then you multiply 2 by 2 to get four because its 2 dollars per pound and you need 2 pounds. so since you don't know the number of pounds you fill in the blanks and do 10/2 to get 5.

Answer:5 Pounds

Step-by-step explanation: Simple Explanation is she bought 5 pounds of apples since each is $2 you count up from two dollars 5 times.