In which modern-day South American country did Incan civilization begin?

Claims disputes between the federal and state governments have the potential to have a considerable impact on their interactions and may have wider ramifications for how the US operates as a whole. It is crucial that both parties cooperate to resolve any conflicts using mutually acceptable means.

The relationship between the federal government and the states may be significantly impacted by claims that are in dispute. It may cause tension and conflict between the two organizations when a state contests a claim put forth by the federal government. The state and federal governments may find it challenging to collaborate successfully as a result of this conflict since it can cause a breakdown in communication and cooperation.

Legal disputes and court lawsuits may result if the contested claim is connected to a rule or legislation. The state-federal relationship could become even more strained as a result, and this could also affect how other states interact with the federal government.

In severe situations, conflicts between a state and the federal government could lead to the state trying to secede from the union or claiming its sovereignty. This might trigger a constitutional crisis, which would have broad ramifications for the whole nation.

Learn more on Claims disputes here https://brainly.com/question/29729313

#SPJ1

D. XYZ

cdcc dccd cdc dcd cdcdd c cddccdd c

Answer:

The freedom to worship, freedom to speak, freedom to trade, and strong education.

hope this helps!

Answer:

In 476 AD, a Germanic barbarian by the name of Odoacer took control of Rome. He became king of Italy and forced the last emperor of Rome, Romulus Augustulus, to give up his crown. Many historians consider this to be the end of the Roman Empire.

Explanation:

by which  was the end of the western roman empire

The conflict known as the War of the Spanish Succession, which lasted from 1701 to 14 years, was caused by a dispute over who should succeed Charles II.

As it was the last Spanish Habsburg king who had no children, as the country's monarch. In order to maintain the balance of power in Europe, it was important to decide whether the immense holdings of the Spanish Empire should transfer to the House of Bourbon or the House of Habsburg, both of which had hereditary claims. In the end, a rising Britain and its expanding colonial empire triumphed over French and Spanish dominance. Due to Spain's outrage at this division agreement, Charles II made a will in November 1698 naming Joseph Ferdinand as his heir.

Learn more about colonial here:

https://brainly.com/question/24475115

#SPJ4

Answer:

Hago que esto parezca respondido, pero en español hola, lo siento, necesito los puntos nuevamente, lo siento

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

false

Cultural beliefs and practices can markedly influence a woman's pregnancy and childbirth experiences and may shape her mothering behavior. In addition, dietary intake before and during pregnancy and through lactation is often influenced by cultural beliefs and practices.

The emperor who is said to have sang and danced while Rome burned in 64 CE is Emperor Nero. This is a historic event that happened during the reign of Emperor Nero, the fifth Roman emperor, and lasted for six days. The fire started on July 18, 64, at the southeastern end of the Circus Maximus.

The fire then quickly spread throughout the city due to a strong summer wind. Many of Rome's citizens were killed, and many more lost their homes and possessions. Nero was not in Rome at the time, but when he returned and saw the destruction, he immediately began efforts to help the victims. However, rumors soon spread that he was the one who had started the fire to make room for his own palace.

To refute these rumors, Nero shifted the blame onto the Christians, who were a religious minority at the time. He ordered that Christians be arrested, tortured, and executed. Despite the fact that there was no evidence of their involvement, Nero continued to blame the Christians.

it should be noted that Tacitus was a political opponent of Nero, and his accounts of the emperor's actions should be taken with a grain of salt.

To know more about possessions visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/20886271

#SPJ11

We can see here that if invests $100 monthly from age 18, the person will actually get more than when he started investing at age 35.

Investment refers to the process by which a particular asset is dedicated to attain value over a certain period of time. Investment usually involves the sacrifice of some things in order to get a return known as return on investment (ROI).

We see here that if one actually invests $100 monthly from age 18, the person will actually get more than when he started investing at age 35.

Learn more about investment on https://brainly.com/question/25790997

Answer:

I think that both historians are biased. One more that the the other, but the correct answer is D Historian A does not want to mention any events that might make the British look cruel or aggressive.

Caesar Augustus was the Roman king and the most beloved monarch because of his socioeconomic and political reforms.

Caesar Augustus reigned the Rome from 27 BC until his death in AD 14. He was the ruler who created a dynasty and expanded the kingdom to a large extent. He added Egypt, northern Spain and large parts of central Europe under his kingdom.

Monarch is the ruler of a state for life or until abduction. The king or the queen of a region are therefore the monarchs. If there is the tradition of absolute monarchy, the entire power remains in the head of the ruler. However in case of constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch are limited.

To know more about monarch, here

brainly.com/question/10740346

#SPJ4

Answer:

It’s in Dresden, isn’t it? I seem to remember that the two men offering bread and wine are portraits of two of the leaders of the Reformation, but I’ve forgotten whom.

According to Paine, the establishment of the present monarchy in England through conquest and the lack of merit-based selection proves that hereditary succession is not natural or fair.

According to Paine, the way in which the present monarchy in England was established proves that hereditary succession is not natural.
1. Paine argues that the establishment of the present monarchy in England was based on conquest and force, rather than any natural right or choice by the people. This means that the monarchy's authority is not derived from the will of the people.
2. Paine asserts that hereditary succession is not a natural right because it is based on birth rather than merit or ability. In other words, just because someone is born into a certain family does not automatically make them fit to rule.
3. Paine believes that hereditary succession can lead to incompetent and corrupt rulers, as they are not selected based on their qualifications or skills but rather because of their bloodline.
4. Paine argues that a system of government based on hereditary succession denies individuals the opportunity to participate in the selection and governance of their leaders. This goes against the principles of democracy and equal representation.
In conclusion, Paine suggests that the establishment of the present monarchy in England through conquest and the lack of merit-based selection demonstrates that hereditary succession is not a natural or fair way of determining leadership.

Learn more about monarchy

https://brainly.com/question/3710014

#SPJ11

true i think. sorry if i got it wrong

In conclusion, the period from 1875 to 1950 was marked by numerous social and political challenges in Latin American countries. These challenges impacted the region's economic development, political stability, and social structure and continue to shape the region's contemporary political landscape.

Over the period from 1875 to 1950, Latin American countries faced significant social and political challenges that impacted the region's development. Among these challenges was the impact of colonialism and its lingering effects on the region's economy, social structure, and political landscape. The growing disparity between the wealthy and poor citizens, as well as between rural and urban areas, was a significant social challenge. This disparity was often compounded by weak institutions, rampant corruption, and political instability. Many of the region's political leaders struggled to balance competing interests, maintain order, and implement reforms to address these issues. Another significant challenge was the exploitation of natural resources by foreign companies and the impact on the environment and local communities. This exploitation often led to environmental degradation, displacement of indigenous populations, and exploitation of workers. Additionally, the period saw the rise of authoritarian regimes, military coups, and political violence. These developments further undermined the region's stability and contributed to significant human rights violations.

to know more about  social and political challenges visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9049400

#SPJ11

The first one is A. They wanted a northwest passage to Asia through the Americas via water route.

The second one is True. Portugal was the lead in overseas explorations. In fact, Vasco Da Gama was the first European to reach India in 1498.

Hope this helps.

D. They opposed détente.

Conservatives criticized President Ford's foreign policy for being too conciliatory and focused on detente with the Soviet Union, which they saw as a form of appeasement. They believed that the United States should take a more aggressive stance against communism and prioritize military strength and intervention abroad. They also criticized Ford's handling of the Vietnam War, particularly his decision to withdraw American troops and aid in 1975, which they felt was a betrayal of South Vietnam and a setback for American prestige and influence in the world.

Answer: D. Leave their homelands and move to present-day Oklahoma.

Explanation: The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a federal law passed by the United States government that required Native American groups in the Southeast to leave their homelands and move to present-day Oklahoma. The act was part of a larger policy of Indian removal that aimed to open up more land in the Southeast for white settlement and commerce. The forced relocation of the Native American groups, known as the Trail of Tears, resulted in the death of thousands of Native Americans due to disease, starvation, and exposure. The Indian Removal Act was a traumatic event in the history of Native Americans and remains a significant part of their legacy and cultural heritage.

The new Constitution of Florida of 1885 included several provisions to limit the power of the governor, including: The governor's veto power was curtailed, Governor's term limit and Governor's removal.

The three things that were in the new constitution which served to limit the power of the governor are as follows:

1. The governor's veto power was curtailed - The 1885 constitution of Florida limited the governor's veto power by requiring a two-thirds majority of each house of the state legislature to overturn a veto. This meant that the governor's veto power could be overruled only in rare situations, limiting the governor's power.

2. Governor's term limit - The governor's term was limited to four years, and the governor could not succeed himself or herself for more than two consecutive terms. This served to limit the governor's power because a governor could not be in office for an extended period.

3. Governor's removal - The constitution of Florida of 1885 allowed the governor to be removed from office for "incompetency, malfeasance, corruption, or misconduct in office." The Florida Legislature was responsible for investigating and removing the governor.

This served to limit the governor's power because the governor was accountable to the Florida Legislature and could be removed if they were found guilty of any of the crimes mentioned above.

Therefore, the three things that were in the new constitution which served to limit the power of the governor are 'the governor's veto power was curtailed', 'Governor's term limit' and 'Governor's removal'.

Learn more about Constitution of Florida here:

brainly.com/question/17452390

#SPJ11

Answer:

Democrats wanted to take control of the Republican-led city government.

Explanation:

can i have brainliest please

Answer:

c.

Explanation:

right on edge

Answer: The Yom Kippur War of 1973 was fought between Israel on one side and Egypt and Syria on the other. Israel was backed by the United States, while Egypt and Syria were backed by the Soviet Union and were joined by soldiers from other Arab countries.

Explanation:

Answer: he didn't want his friends to see him so he was basically avoiding  his friends

Explanation: i did my research

Sieyès say keeps the different rights upper class isolated from most people.

Hence, Option B is correct

To know more about Rights here

https://brainly.com/question/921569

#SPJ4

Answer:

Yes the allocation of resources was smart

Explanation:

Prior to Billy Beane, The resources were not allocated efficiently however Billy introduced the use of statistics to determine the value of asset and also determine the ability of players.

The techniques was simple that allows  small-market teams to buy assets that are considered undervalues by other teams. On the other hand these small-market teams sell assets that are considered overvalued by other teams.

Yes, the allocating resources was well-thought-out.

According to Billy Beane, supplies were not distributed efficiently, but Billy pioneered the use of analytics to evaluate the worth of assets as well as player abilities.

The strategy was straightforward, and it allowed small-market teams to purchase properties that the other teams felt undervalued. These smaller clubs, on the other hand, sell off assets that some other teams believe are overpriced.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/2916766?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

B. with Hitler's rise to power in 1933

Explanation:

Based on the available information, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer without access to the specific map mentioned. However, we can make a general comparison of political participation in India, China, Russia, and Mexico.

India is the world's largest democracy, which allows for a considerable amount of citizen political participation through elections, freedom of speech, and the right to protest. China, on the other hand, is an authoritarian one-party state with limited opportunities for citizen political participation, as the government tightly controls the political process. Russia, while nominally a democracy, has a history of authoritarian leadership and limited political freedom, which restricts citizens' political participation. Mexico is a federal republic with democratic institutions, and while it has faced issues with corruption and political violence, it generally allows for more political participation than China or Russia.

To know more about political participation

https://brainly.com/question/30228517

#SPJ11

Answer: The monarchy ended

Explanation: