Answer below
Explanation:
Due to the longlasting damages in many global superpowers caused by WWI, the economy was in shambles. Germany in particular had gone through a massive depression, inflation levels so high that citizens were burning piles money to keep warm in the winter. They were desperate for more supplies. People were growing restless throughout Europe, as they were aware of Germany's situation, and were worries as Germany was arguably one of the main causes of WWI. Political leaders in the UK, US, and France had been keeping a close eye on Germany since the Treaty of Versailles (in which was the main reason why Germany was in shambles). However, when Hitler rose to power - many, if not all, of the restrictions placed on Germany were secretly being broken.
Identify the elements of Boccaccio’s writing that demonstrate each feature of humanism
Literacy:
striving agains fortune:
Expressing personal thoughts and feelings:
Boccaccio's writing demonstrates humanism through his literary prowess, portrayal of human agency against adversity, and inclusion of personal thoughts and emotions.
Boccaccio's writing demonstrates elements of humanism through:
Literacy: Boccaccio's works, such as "The Decameron," showcase his literary skills and command of the Italian language. His writing style and use of vernacular were influential in promoting the use of local languages and promoting literacy among the general population.Striving against fortune: Boccaccio explores themes of human agency and individual effort in navigating life's challenges. His characters often face adversity and demonstrate resilience, reflecting the humanistic belief in the power of human will and determination.Expressing personal thoughts and feelings: Boccaccio's writing incorporates introspection and subjective viewpoints, allowing characters to express their inner thoughts, emotions, and personal experiences. This emphasis on individual expression and the exploration of human psychology aligns with the humanistic focus on the individual and their unique experiences.For more questions on humanism, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13511824
#SPJ8
Please help!!
Please write a two page essay on immigration. ASAP will mark brainliest and get 38 points (it’s all I have)
in 1942, churchill and rossevelt aggred to attack the edges of the Germany empire becuase they believed that
In 1942, Churchill and Roosevelt agreed to attack the edges of the German empire to divert resources, relieve pressure on the Soviet Union, and weaken Germany's hold on key regions.
In 1942, Churchill and Roosevelt agreed to attack the edges of the German empire because they believed that it would divert German military resources and relieve pressure on the Soviet Union, a key ally in the fight against Nazi Germany. By launching offensives in North Africa, Italy, and eventually Western Europe, they aimed to weaken Germany's hold on these regions, disrupt supply lines, and draw German forces away from the Eastern Front. They saw these peripheral attacks as a strategic approach to eroding Germany's power and creating opportunities for a full-scale invasion to eventually liberate Europe from Nazi occupation.
Learn more about the Soviet Union:
https://brainly.com/question/31565617
#SPJ11
What were the arguments for and against American Expansion (moving westward ) ?
Answer:
This should answer your question
Explanation: The anti-imperialists opposed expansion, believing that imperialism violated the fundamental principle that just republican government must derive from "consent of the governed." The League argued that such activity would necessitate the abandonment of American ideals of self-government and non-intervention
What naval advancement did Themistocles develop for the Athenians? PLS ANSWER ASAP
A: Built larger ships that could withstand attacks.
B: Equipped battleships with underwater rams.
C: Small, fast ships.
D: Included towers on the ships that allowed archers a better line of sight.
The naval advancement developed by Themistocles for the Athenians was equipped battleships with underwater rams. So, option B is the right choice.
Themistocles played a significant role in transforming the Athenian navy by introducing a revolutionary innovation known as the trireme. These warships were equipped with a prominent underwater ram attached to the front. The ram was made of bronze and positioned at the waterline, enabling the Athenian ships to deliver powerful blows to enemy vessels by ramming into their sides.This development was crucial because it allowed the Athenians to gain a tactical advantage during naval battles. By incorporating underwater rams, the Athenian triremes became formidable weapons capable of inflicting damage and sinking enemy ships. The rams allowed the Athenians to exploit their naval prowess, as they could employ their maneuverability and speed to strike decisive blows against their adversaries. This advancement in naval technology significantly contributed to Athenian naval dominance in the ancient Mediterranean and played a crucial role in the outcome of battles such as the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE.The right answer is B. Equipped battleships with underwater rams.
For more such question on Athenians
https://brainly.com/question/16736339
#SPJ8
Which of these was the first land policy adopted in Georgia during Westward Expansion?
Group of answer choices
The Headright System
The Yazoo Act
The Land Lottery
The Indian Removal Ac
Why is The KKK Marches in Washington important to history?
Answer:
the Ku Klux Klan march down Constitution Avenue. U.S. Marshals joined with local police agencies to keep anti-klan demonstrators from clashing with participants in the Klan march.
Washington, D.C. is not your ordinary American city and Sunday, October 28, 1990 was not just another ordinary day in the nation's capital. Congress was still trying to finalize the 1991 budget. The White house was considering its response to Saddam Hussein's bellicose rhetoric from the Mid-east. And a District Court Judge was granting the KLI Klux Klan
permission to march down Constitution.
For most Washingtonians, tensions at home and abroad become very common place events and are generally taken very calmly. However, the idea or a Ku Klux Klan march on the city's streets was a different matter. As word of the Klan rally raced through D.C. neighborhoods, local law enforcement officials became concerned and apprehensive.
The issue of granting marching permits to the Klan provoked some interagency tensions among police departments. However, one agency silently kept its vigil on events to come, and prepared for the worst. That agency was the district office of the U.S. Marshals Service.
The court order which permitted the Klan to march was issued at 1 :30 a.m. on Sunday. But for U.S. Marshal Herbert M. Rutherford, III, it came as no surprise. Since he was familiar with past rallies in the city, he also knew that there would probably be counter-demonstrations which would likely bring the potential for violence to the streets of Washington. Using his authority as the top-ranking federal law enforcement official in the city, Rutherford began to coordinate and federalize operations for the rally through the U. S. Marshals Service's Headquarters.
With the immediate approval of senior officials, a major call up of Deputy Marshals was initiated for the District and Superior Courts of Washington, D.C., the Eastern District of Virginia and the District of Maryland to provide supply and logistical support. By 7 a.m.. only five and one-half hours after the Federal district Judge issued his order, the operational command staff had assembled. An hour later, full coordination had begun with the U.S.
Park Police and U.S. Capitol Police Intelligence.
By 10 a.m., more than 80 Deputies and administrative personnel had assembled and were receiving their briefings. Because the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department was tasked with primary coverage of the march route, the Marshals had a different mission. Rutherford issued directives for the Marshals to stage as the final protective line for all police
departments involved and to seal any breeches that developed in the police
lines and make demonstrator arrests.
What stipulations have the British added to this agreement that will benefit them?
Answer:
HUSSEIN had to support an arab revolt agains the ottoman empire, an enemy of brittian at the time
Explanation:
took us a while but here is your answer good luck
During World War I, the British made many promises and treaties that affected the future of the Middle East. These include:
Sykes-Picot Pact (1916) : The Sykes-Picot Pact was a secret agreement between Britain and France aimed at dividing the territories of the Ottoman Empire in the Middle EastMcMahon-Hussain Letters (1915-1916): The McMahon-Hussain Letters are a series of letters exchanged between British Prime Minister Henry McMahon and Sharif Hussain of MeccaBalfour Declaration (1917): The Balfour Declaration was a statement issued by the British government expressing support for the creation of a national home for the Jewish people in PalestineThus, these treaties and promises made by the British had a long-term impact on the Middle East, shaping the region’s borders and politics.
For more details regarding World War, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ2
Your question seems incomplete, the probable complete question is:
What stipulations have the British added to this agreement that will benefit them?
Britain's World War I Promises and the Redrawing of the Middle EasternBordersDuring wars, countries make deals with one another to increase their chance of winning. Oftennegotiations address what might happen at the conclusion of the war. During World War I, theBritish made promises to three different groups about the future of the Middle East.
Explain why many Americans came to settle in Texas and how it became an independent nation.
Answer: Following Mexico's independence from Spain in 1821, American settlers immigrated to Texas in even larger numbers, intent on taking the land from the new and vulnerable Mexican nation in order to create a new American slave state.
All of the following are true of the Kennedy assassination EXCEPT: a.many of the related events were watched on television. b.the primary suspect was Lee Harvey Oswald. c.Jack Ruby shot and killed the suspected assassin. d.the Warren Commission concluded there may have been multiple gunmen. e.it occurred in Dallas on November 22, 1963.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
d. The Warren Commission concluded there may have been multiple gunmen.
Explanation:
John F. Kennedy, as the president of the United States during the 1960's was assassinated during his motorcade movement by former U.S. Marine Lee Harvey Oswald who was fired from a nearby building.
The Warren Commission concluded that Oswald assassinated Kennedy. During the period of the assassination, Oswald had acted entirely alone, and that Ruby had acted alone in killing Oswald.
Grey rents an apartment to Hugh, who retains possession of the apartment after the lease expires without making any payments of rent and without Grey's permission. This is
Based on the given terms, this situation is known as "holdover tenancy." When Hugh retains possession of the apartment after the lease expires without making rent payments and without Grey's permission, he becomes a "holdover tenant."
Grey has the right to pursue legal action to evict Hugh and may potentially be able to collect damages for the unpaid rent during the holdover period.
When Hugh retains possession of the apartment after the lease expires without paying rent or obtaining permission from Grey, it creates tenancy situation where Hugh is occupying the property without any legal right to do so and this is considered as a breach of the lease agreement.
In such cases, Grey, as the landlord, can have legal remedies available to address that particular situation, such as initiating eviction proceedings or pursuing legal action to recover the unpaid rent.
To know more about tenancy, refer
https://brainly.com/question/30420028
#SPJ11
Final Exam: Write a paragraph noting the importance of the African American vote(r). You may add personal experiences and the history/struggle of Black Americans voting. Why is it important? or not? What will happen either way? 1-2 pages. 100 points
Plse help me
Answer:
Here is a link you can use.
Explanation:
https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/elections/right-to-vote/voting-rights-for-african-americans/
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on
what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to
try to get each side to explain its point of view?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a Supreme Court justice, my initial reactions to the situation would depend on the specific details and context of the case at hand. However, when considering the War Powers Act, it is important to evaluate the roles and powers of each branch of government involved in order to determine which branch may be in the right.
The War Powers Act is designed to address the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches regarding the use of military force. It sets guidelines for the president's authority to deploy troops without a declaration of war and imposes certain reporting requirements to Congress.
In this case, I would assess whether the president's actions in deploying troops align with the provisions and limitations outlined in the War Powers Act. I would carefully consider the extent of the president's powers as commander-in-chief and whether they have been exceeded, leading to a potential infringement on Congress's authority to declare war or provide authorization for military actions.
During oral arguments, I would ask both sides to explain their respective points of view. To the executive branch, I would inquire about the legal justification and rationale for the deployment of troops, seeking clarification on the specific provisions of the War Powers Act that were considered in making the decision. I would also ask whether the president followed the required reporting procedures to Congress.
To the legislative branch, I would inquire about their interpretation of the War Powers Act and whether they believe the president's actions exceeded his authority. I would seek explanations regarding their understanding of Congress's role in declaring war or authorizing military actions and how they believe the president's actions align or deviate from these constitutional provisions.
Additional questions could include seeking clarification on the immediacy and necessity of the deployment, the potential national security implications, the presence of any ongoing threat, and the extent of consultation and communication between the executive and legislative branches.
Through these questions, I would aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of the legal arguments, constitutional implications, and factual circumstances surrounding the case to make an informed decision in accordance with the War Powers Act and the principles of checks and balances outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
how did thomas hobbs influence the founding fathers
How did climate help determine where North Carolina’s early settlers lived?
Answer:
B2K
Explanation:
looser boy
After World War II, the population of the Sun Belt grew because:
O A. there were more job opportunities in agricultural industries in the
South and Southwest.
OB. there were more job opportunities in defense and manufacturing
industries in the South and Southwest.
O C. there were more job opportunities because of the Interstate
Highway System in the South and Southwest.
OD. there were more job opportunities in travel industries in the South
and Southwest.
Explanation:
the answer should be option b
is an example of a nation that uses a monarchy.
Answer:
Explanation:
Bahrain, Belgium, Bhutan, Darussalam, Cambodia, Denmark, Jordan, Kuwait, Lesotho, Principality of Liechtenstein, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Malaysia, Principality of Monaco, Morocco, Netherlands, Norway, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Swaziland, Sweden, Thailand, Tonga, UAE, and Vatican City
I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!
Which claim does Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. make in his "I Have A Dream" speech?
Segregation is evidence that African Americans are still not truly free.
African Americans benefit equally from the justice system.
African Americans should use their bitterness to fuel their fight for justice.
The U.S. government should pay African Americans money.
Question 2
Part B
Which evidence from King's speech is most relevant in supporting the claim identified in Part A?
"We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating 'for whites only.'"
"In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds."
"This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism."
"There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights."
Answer:
Segregation is evidence that African Americans are still not truly free.
Martin Luther King JR did not say that African americans benefitted from the justice system, He did not say African Americans should be payed. Although African Americans should use their bitterness to fuel theri fight for justice is a message during BLM Protests in the 60s'. I have a dream is a message that suggests a goal or want for the future of racial justice for African Americans, His dream is to elimate segregation in the US for freedom for all. That is his goal and dream. I hoped I Helped :D!
Answer: a for both of them
Explanation:
At the end of page one, Marcus begins his argument for the natural basis of law. The first argument has several steps, each of which has been given a number in the text. List the numbers on the page and then write out a brief version of each step, in your own words. Do you think the argument is a good one? why?
*The Reading is De Officiis by Cicero"
Here is the "Argument":
MARCUS:
(1) To begin, then, do you grant that the entire universe is overruled by the power of God, that by his nature, reason, energy, mind, and divinity, all things are governed and directed?
ATTICUS: I grant the existence of God and the activity of divine providence.
MARCUS:
(2) Since you grant me these, I maintain that God has been especially beneficent to man. This human animal—prescient, sagacious, complex, acute, full of memory, reason and counsel, which we call man—is generated by the supreme God in a superior condition than most of his fellow creatures. He is the only creature among the earthly races of living things endowed with reason.
(3) And what is there, in all heaven and earth, more divine than reason, which, when it becomes ripe and perfect, is justly termed wisdom?
(4) But nature hath not merely given us reason, but right reason, and consequently that law, which is nothing else than right reason encouraging what is good, and forbidding what is evil.
(5) Now if nature hath given us law, she hath also given us justice,—for as she has bestowed reason on all, she has equally bestowed the sense of justice on all.
(6) We conclude, therefore, that man is born for justice, and that law and equity are not a mere establishment of opinion, but an institution of nature.
Marcus argues that God governs the universe, bestowing humans with reason and the capacity for wisdom. Nature has provided humans with right reason, which becomes law, guiding good and prohibiting evil. The sense of justice is innate in all humans, leading Marcus to conclude that humans are naturally inclined towards justice, making law and equity inherent aspects of their existence.
Marcus begins by establishing that the entire universe is governed by God and that all things are directed by God's power, reason, energy, mind, and divinity.Marcus argues that God has been particularly kind to humans, who possess unique qualities such as prescience, sagacity, complexity, acuity, memory, reason, and counsel. Humans are considered superior to most other creatures and are endowed with reason.Marcus asserts that reason is divine and, when fully developed, becomes wisdom, which is the highest quality found in heaven and earth.Marcus claims that nature has not only given humans reason but also right reason. This right reason is equated with law, which encourages what is good and prohibits what is evil.Marcus further states that if nature has given humans law, it has also given them justice. Just as reason is bestowed upon all, the sense of justice is inherent in all humans.Marcus concludes that humans are inherently meant for justice, and law and equity are not merely products of human opinion but rather institutions of nature.Regarding whether the argument is a good one, it depends on personal perspectives and beliefs. Marcus presents a line of reasoning that connects the existence of God, the endowment of reason, the presence of right reason as law, and the innate sense of justice in humans.
The argument emphasizes the natural basis of law and justice, implying that they are fundamental aspects of human nature rather than arbitrary constructs.
Whether one finds this argument compelling would depend on their acceptance of the premises, such as the existence of God and the inherent qualities of reason and justice.
For more questions on wisdom
https://brainly.com/question/30009007
#SPJ8
What things increased sub Saharan trade
The advent of the camel and the spread of Islam were the two reasons that fueled the expansion of trans-Saharan trade. The growth of trans-Saharan trade was primarily influenced by Islam. The Berbers adopted Islam following the Arab conquests in the early sixth century CE.
The primary product of trans-Saharan trade was gold, which was sought from western and central Sudan. The need for and availability of coins fueled the trade in gold. The development of the Ghanaian Soninke empire in the fifth century seems to have been connected to the start of the trans-Saharan gold trade.
Learn more about trans-Saharan trade here:
https://brainly.com/question/30004352
#SPJ1
ssing or disabled. To edit offline, enable the extension. To disable offline editing, update your settings. Essential Question: What is the difference between primary and secondary sources?
Answer:
Primary sources are pieces of history that come directly from the time period that you are studying. They would be writte or made, etc, during the time of a key event. An example of this would be Anne Franks diary. It was written during World War II, hence it is a primary source.
Secondary sources are things written after the key event, and the information/inspiration (depending on what the source is) would most likely be from primary sources. An example is a history textbook. Everything in it would be obtained from primary sources.
Hope this helps!
7. Why was the court case involving Johann Peter Zenger, publisher of The New York Weekly Journal, important?
Answer:
John Peter Zenger (October 26, 1697 – July 28, 1746) was a German printer and journalist in New York City. Zenger printed The New York Weekly Journal. He was accused of libel in 1734 by William Cosby, the royal governor of New York, but the jury acquitted Zenger, who became a symbol for freedom of the press.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you
In the late nineteenth century, many cities cut death rates from typhoid, yellow fever, and cholera by instituting what?
Answer: New sewage and drainage systems
Explanation:
Who could not seek amnesty under this oath of
allegiance? Check all that apply.
The persons excepted from the benefits of the foregoing
provisions are all who are, or shall have been, civil or
diplomatic officers or agents of the so-called Confederate
government; all who have left judicial stations under the
United States to aid the rebellion; all who are, or shall
have been, military or naval officers of said so-called
Confederate government above the rank of colonel in the
army or of lieutenant in the navy; all who left seats in the
United States congress to aid the rebellion; all who
resigned commissions in the army or navy of the United
States and afterwards aided the rebellion; and all who
have engaged in any way in treating colored persons, or
white persons in charge of such, otherwise than lawfully
as prisoners of war, and which persons may have been
found in the United States service as soldiers, seamen, or
in any other capacity.
- Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction,
Abraham Lincoln
former Confederate government officials
O congressional representatives or judges who had
left office to join the rebellion
commissioned officers of the US Army or US Navy
who had left to join the rebellion
O members of the Confederate army and navy
O people who mistreated African American soldiers
or white officers who were prisoners of war
Confederate military officers with the rank of
colonel or higher
Answer: A,B,C,D,E
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is ABCEF
Explanation:
edge 2021
What is a moral dilemma that you have experienced directly or vicariously (from reading)? Are you happy with how you addressed the moral dilemma you went through? Or do you agree with how the moral dilemma that you read was addressed? Write your reflections.
One moral dilemma that I have experienced vicariously through reading is the one presented in the novel "The Kite Runner" by Khaled Hosseini. The main character, Amir, witnesses his friend Hassan being sexually assaulted by a group of boys, but instead of helping him, he chooses to run away and abandon his friend.
As the story progresses, Amir struggles with feelings of guilt and shame for his inaction and eventually makes amends by returning to his home country and rescuing Hassan's son from danger.
While I cannot say that I have directly experienced a similar moral dilemma, I believe that the novel presents a powerful message about the importance of taking responsibility for one's actions and making amends for past mistakes. It reminds us that we have a moral obligation to stand up for what is right, even when it is difficult or uncomfortable to do so.
To learn more about moral dilemma follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/26929301
#SPJ4
After WWI, the world took countless steps to prevent another global war; that obviously failed. Why?
4. Newspapers saw radio news shows as competition.
False
True
Answer:
true
Explanation:
What is depicted in the image above
Answer:
bridge
autumn
Explanation:
why did some africans americans consider immigration to africa
The mass movement was motivated by a desire to avoid racial violence and pursue economic and educational opportunities.
The Great Migration is typically divided into two parts that correspond to the United States' involvement and effects in both World Wars. Migration has played an important role in African history. The human species most likely began spreading across the earth between 2 and 2.5 million years ago, both within and outside of Africa.
Population movements in Africa during the pro-colonial era were mostly related to the prevailing sociopolitical and ecological conditions, particularly internecine violence, natural calamities, and the hunt for arable land or colonization.
Learn more about immigration here:
https://brainly.com/question/17141328
A student is examining a current map of the world. Which question might the
student ask about the map if she wants to focus on an economic historical
theme