The Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison at the Constitutional Convention, aimed to establish a stronger national government with a two-house legislature that gave more power to the larger states.
What else was proposed?The plan called for a proportional representation system for both houses of Congress, which would ensure that states with larger populations had more say in government affairs.
Additionally, it proposed that the federal government should be able to override state laws when necessary.
The Virginia Plan did not include a Bill of Rights, but the final Constitution included ten amendments that protected citizens' basic rights, such as freedom of religion and the right to a fair trial.
Read more about the Virginia Plan here:
https://brainly.com/question/30021982
#SPJ1
approximately what percentage of defendants referred for competency evaluation are typically found competent to stand trial?
Approximately 70-90% of defendants referred for competency evaluation are typically found competent to stand trial.
Competency to stand trial, also known as fitness to stand trial, refers to an individual's mental state and ability to understand and participate in the criminal proceedings against them. When there is a question about a defendant's competency, a competency evaluation is conducted to assess their mental capacity.
The purpose of a competency evaluation is to determine whether the defendant has the ability to understand the nature of the charges, comprehend the roles of the different courtroom participants, assist in their own defense, and have a rational understanding of the legal process. The evaluation is usually conducted by mental health professionals, such as psychologists or psychiatrists, who assess the defendant's cognitive functioning, psychiatric condition, and overall mental competency.
While the exact percentage may vary depending on jurisdiction and specific circumstances, research and studies indicate that the majority of defendants referred for competency evaluation are found competent to stand trial. Estimates suggest that approximately 70-90% of defendants are deemed competent after undergoing evaluation.
It is important to note that competency evaluations and determinations are intended to ensure a fair trial process and protect the rights of defendants. If a defendant is found incompetent to stand trial, they may be temporarily or indefinitely committed to receive treatment until they are deemed competent to proceed with the legal proceedings. The goal is to strike a balance between ensuring justice for the accused and safeguarding the rights and well-being of individuals with mental health issues.
However, it is crucial to remember that these statistics are general approximations and can vary depending on the jurisdiction, specific cases, and the criteria used in determining competency. The precise percentage may also be influenced by factors such as the quality of mental health services, the adequacy of evaluation processes, and variations in legal systems.
In summary, approximately 70-90% of defendants referred for competency evaluation are typically found competent to stand trial. These evaluations play a crucial role in assessing a defendant's mental competency and ensuring a fair trial process.
Learn more about defendants here
https://brainly.com/question/30609800
#SPJ11
patty principal fired al agent because al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. unless patty notifies the third parties who dealt with al that he is no longer her agent, al will continue to have authority and patty will be bound by his actions.
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
The type of authority that Al will continue to have depends on the circumstances of his relationship with Patty and the way he presented himself to third parties.
First, it's important to understand that there are four types of authority in agency law: actual authority, apparent authority, implied authority, and incidental authority.
Actual authority refers to the express or implied powers that the principal grants to the agent. Apparent authority arises when the principal creates the appearance of authority in the agent's actions, even if the principal did not actually grant that authority.
Implied authority refers to the powers that are necessary or customary for the agent to carry out the principal's express or apparent instructions. Incidental authority refers to the powers that are incidental to the agent's express or implied authority.
In this case, Patty would be bound by Al's actions if he continues to act as her agent, even though she fired him. In summary, if Patty does not notify third parties that Al is no longer her agent, then Al may continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
However, if Patty properly terminates Al's actual and apparent authority, then Al will no longer be able to act on her behalf, regardless of any remaining implied or incidental authority.
For more question on "Apparent Authority" :
https://brainly.com/question/29893631
#SPJ11
Complete Question
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have __________authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
implied
incidental
actual
apparent
in american government’s federal framework, sovereignty (that is, supreme and independent political authority) is
In the American federal framework, sovereignty is divided between the federal government and the individual states.
In the federal structure of the American government, the federal government and the various states share the supreme and independent political authority known as sovereignty. A key component of federalism is this division of sovereignty. All other powers are reserved to the states or the people, as stated in the Tenth Amendment, according to the U.S. Constitution which establishes the federal government as a limited government with only those powers granted to it.
The states retain residual authority to run their internal affairs, while the federal government has certain enumerated powers, such as the ability to control interstate commerce and declare war. Within the American political system, this shared sovereignty ensures a balance between national leadership and state autonomy.
Learn more about federal structure at:
brainly.com/question/31417366
#SPJ4
Annette is a forensic technician. She is testing a hair found at a crime scene to determine if it came from an animal or a human. Which part of
the hair shaft should she measure for diameter?
Annette should measure the
to see if it is less than one-third the diameter of the hair shaft, which would indicate it is human hair.
Answer:
Any single hair from anywhere on the human body can be used to identify a person. This conclusion is one of the key findings from a nearly year-long study by a team of researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Forensic Science Center (FSC) and Michigan State University.
Explanation:
human hair. Hair is used as class evidence, and can be used as individual evidence if theres a follicle attached. ... The shaft of a mature human hair does not contain nuclear DNA so that only mitochondrial DNA analysis is possible for such samples.
Answer: Annette should measure the Medulla
Explanation:
The medulla is less than one third on humans and more than one half on animals hence why it would indicate whether it’s human hair or animal hair
While the incarceration rate has risen dramatically in the past 20 years, the number of people executed has declined. Identify two factors that explain this decrease in the execution rate. Does this signal a change in punishment philosophy in the United States? Explain, using facts, why or why not.
Explanation:
The incarceration rate has gone up due to increase in population and increase in gender equality. Female populations are more likely to become incarcerated than before. For the execution part, more and more people are starting to see the death penalty and its following executions to be seen as "cruel and unusual punishment." along with the cost of a death penalty sentencing compared to life in prison, judges are opting more for other alternatives besides death penalty. This could signal a potential change in punishment philosophy, with death penalty potentially going away in the future.
What are the 3 main types of economic sanctions?
Answer:
There are many different types of economic sanctions, but some of the most common ones include trade sanctions, financial sanctions, and oil sanctions. Trade sanctions are typically aimed at limiting or restricting the import and export of goods between countries, while financial sanctions are designed to limit a country's access to international financial markets. Oil sanctions, on the other hand, are designed to limit a country's access to the global oil market. These types of sanctions are often used as a way to pressure a country to change its behavior, such as by stopping the development of nuclear weapons or supporting terrorist organizations.
2.
A "state actor" is prohibited from interfering with private rights, unless there is a
constitutionally permissible reason to do so.
True or false
Evaluate the Women's Compensation Act, 1987 (P.N.D.C.L 187) and it's adequacy in ensuring effective protection of employees affected by the pandemic.
Answer:
The Act was set up to improve the working conditions and welfare of the workers
Explanation:
The Acts makes arrangement for different types and forms of compensation and a decent wage/salary for workers. The ones who fall ill or have any form of when still engaged in the organization are to be taken care of.
It also ensures good severance packages for its workers. This acts would help in making sure those who fell ill during the pandemic are given some form of relief. The ones who are also likely lose to their jobs due to the pandemic are also to be duly compensated .
How do I answer What duties do you believe you'll be conducting as a Police Officer?
Answer:
Duties to protect people in their cities, and to stop criminals from committing crimes; Such duties are;
Violent offenseNon- violent offenseCivil Disputes (Although a Judge is needed LEO's (Law Enforcement Officers handle some of these) Missing Children'sSo Much more
The prosecutor kept saying that he has to meet her burden of proof with might be difficult in this case what does that mean
The prosecution has the burden of proof in a criminal trial. The defendant must be proven guilty of the allegations against them by the prosecution to the jury without a shadow of a doubt.
What does prosecution mean?
The decision to pursue a case is made by the magistrate based on the police report that was provided, and the prosecutor is then chosen. The prosecutor is chosen to act as the state's or the government's representative in any criminal case.
Such actions are started by the prosecuting attorney, who could be the federal United States Attorney, the state Attorney General, or the district attorney in question.
Learn more about prosecution from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23179189
#SPJ1
characterzes of a dictatorship
Answer:
Explanation:
north korea
Here are some characteristics of a dictatorship:
They usually rule autocracy countriesThey have totalitarian regimes, so the media can not share info about the countryThey do not have anyone to limit their powerHope it helps!
2. Describe a situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does
not have political agthority. Then explain whether you think the rule of law would
likely be respected under such a government.
A situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does not have political authority might be a military dictatorship. In a military dictatorship, the military is in charge of the state and controls the majority of its resources. The military leadership makes all the decisions without input from the citizenry.
Whether or not the rule of law would be respected in such a government is highly dependent on the values of the leadership of the military. If they value the rule of law, they may respect it even though they have a great deal of power. On the other hand, if they value their own power and authority, they may be more likely to sidestep legal protections in favor of their own interests.
presidential elections between 1928 and 1952 revelared major shifts in polical aprty loyalities. anaylize both the reaons for these hcanges and their consequences during the period
The presidential elections between 1928 and 1952 in the United States saw major shifts in political party loyalties.
These changes were driven by a variety of factors and had significant consequences during the period.
One of the main reasons for the changes in political party loyalties during this period was the impact of the Great Depression. The stock market crash of 1929 led to widespread economic hardship and disillusionment with the Republican Party, which was seen as being closely tied to big business interests. This led to a shift in support towards the Democratic Party, which promised to address the economic issues facing ordinary Americans through the New Deal policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Another factor contributing to the changes in political party loyalties during this period was the growing influence of African American voters. The Democratic Party, under Roosevelt's leadership, made a concerted effort to appeal to African American voters, who had previously been loyal to the Republican Party. This shift in support had significant consequences for the political landscape, as African American voters became a key constituency for the Democratic Party.
Overall, the changes in political party loyalties during the period between 1928 and 1952 were driven by a variety of factors, including economic hardship, shifting demographics, and changes in political leadership. These changes had significant consequences for the political landscape of the United States, as the Democratic Party emerged as a dominant political force and the Republican Party struggled to adapt to the changing political environment.
Learn more about business here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ11
Which one of these word is not a sign of intoxication clumsiness slurred speech aggression coherent statement
Answer: Good Morning
Explanation: If someone says good morning I do not automatically think they are intoxicated.
Who is the commander in chief of the
U.S. military forces?
Answer:
Explanation:
The question has been raised as to whether the President is Commander in Chief of the Air Force established as a separate branch of the National Military? It is clear that the President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of the United States comprised within the national military establishment—the Air. Force as well as the Army and the Navy. Under the Constitution, the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy is the supreme military commander charged with the responsibility of protecting and defending the United States. The phrase “Army and Navy” is used in the Constitution as a means of describing all the armed forces of the United States. The fact that one branch of the armed forces is called the “Air Force,” a name not known when the Constitution was adopted, and the fact that the Congress has seen fit to separate the air arm of our armed forces from the land and sea arms cannot detract from the President’s authority as
Commander in Chief of all the armed forces : HAROLD I. BAYNTON
Acting Assistant to the Attorney General
Es un organismo Humanitario imparcial de carácter internacional que ofrece sus servicios a las partes en conflicto armado, protegiendo a las victimas de la guerra y de la violencia interna.
Answer:
Can you do it in English
describe two ways in which a right to say no protect citizens
Answer:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
When one party makes a mistake as to a material fact and the nonmistaken party is unaware of the mistake and is not the cause of the mistake, generally the court will hold that contract is
Answer:
Valid
Explanation:
From the question, the type of mistake described in which one party made the mistake, is known as Unilateral Mistake. However, Unilateral mistake rarely void or cause invalidation of a contract, except if the nonmistaken party is aware of the mistake or is the cause of the mistake.
However, in this case, the nonmistaken party is unaware of the mistake and is not the cause of the mistake, then it is generally expected that the court will hold that contract is VALID.
allow bartenders and bar owners to be held liable for a plaintiff’s injury although the bartender or bar owner did not directly cause the plaintiff’s injury.
In some cases, bartenders and bar owners can be held liable for a plaintiff's injury even if they did not directly cause the injury. This is typically known as "dram shop liability" or "social host liability."
Dram shop liability refers to the legal responsibility of a bar or restaurant that serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes harm to others. In these cases, the bar or restaurant can be held liable for the injuries caused by the intoxicated person.Social host liability, on the other hand, applies to individuals who host private parties or events where alcohol is served.
If a host continues to serve alcohol to a visibly intoxicated guest who subsequently causes harm to others, the host can be held responsible for the injuries.The basis for holding bartenders and bar owners liable in these situations is the recognition of their duty to exercise reasonable care in serving alcohol and preventing harm to others. By serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person, they may be seen as contributing to the person's impairment and the resulting harm caused.
It's important to note that dram shop liability laws vary by jurisdiction, so the specific rules and standards may differ depending on the state or country. It is recommended to consult local laws and legal professionals for specific guidance in a particular jurisdiction.
To know more about liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31356106
#SPJ11
An important duty of the president is
appointing senators.
O addressing ingress.
O creating laws.
O funding the military.
Answer:
Addressing Congress
Explanation:
I'm going to guess that there are 4 questions.
The President does not appoint senators, they are elected by the people of a state.
The President does not create laws, that is up to the Legislative Branch of Congress.
The President does not fund the military, Congress funds the military.
The answer here is
B. Addressing Congress.
What can I do to help?
Answer: I'm not sure if I understand your question, or if you misunderstood the workings of this platform but this is how you ask question where other people answer your question(s).
If you have any questions let me know.
under which law did the federal government authorize the use of military force against states that challenged federal tariff laws?
Answer:
The federal government authorized the use of military force against states that challenged federal tariff laws under the Enforcement Acts. The Enforcement Acts were a series of federal laws enacted by the U.S. Congress in the 1870s and aimed at combating civil rights violations, including actions by the Ku Klux Klan and other groups targeting African Americans during the Reconstruction era. These acts granted federal authorities the power to use military force to suppress insurrections, protect civil rights, and enforce federal laws, including tariff laws, in states that resisted or obstructed their enforcement.
Explanation:
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an advantage of being a sole trader?
Select one:
a. the owner has unlimited liability
b. the business has limited life
c. the owner has total autonomy over business decisions
d. the business is not a separate legal entity
A defendant must testify at trial if asked to come to the stand.
False
True
Answer:
False i heard it on something i forget but ik its false
A warrant is required when arresting a juvenile for a criminal act? True or False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Let’s say this.
A group of teenage boys walks into a retail store, and an officer is 25ft from their presence. They run out of the store carrying electronics. The worker from the store shouts for someone to help them. The officer runs after the juveniles and he/she has the right to make a warrantless arrest on behalf of theft of property, which can result in a fine or time in jail.
So your answer wouldv’e been false.
Describe the negative impact of failing to acknowledge unity diversity
Answer:
Explanation:
Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:
Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.
Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.
Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.
Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.
Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.
Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.
Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime
Yes the law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own because they have been given authority by the government of their nation, as well as sufficient resources and weapons to fight crime.
What is a law enforcement agency?A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government organization tasked with upholding the law. It is referred to as operating inside a jurisdiction when LEAs have some kind of restriction on how they can use their authority. By allowing the exchange of information required for law enforcement between LEAs inside those countries, LEAs that operate across a number of countries, such as Europol, tend to support law enforcement efforts rather than actively enforcing laws. An international law enforcement agency, like Interpol, has authority over and/or conducts operations across national borders in several different countries. A multinational law enforcement agency is one that employs people from various nations but normally only operates in one nation or region of a nation.
To learn more about law enforcement agencies, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14328441
#SPJ2
Tom is a convicted offender held in a correctional center in the state of Staxon. He is set to appear as a witness in a trial that is being held in the state of Vanadia. Which of the following statements is true of this scenario?
The trial will have to be shifted to the state in which Tom is being held, as witnesses for courts cannot be held in jails.
Tom will have to be held in a lockup in Vanadia, as he cannot be held in a jail.
Tom cannot be held in a lockup in Vanadia if he requires medical care.
Tom can be held in a jail in Vanadia only if he is a witness in a federal trial.