How does Mowgli feel in this part of the story?
What is the cause of his feelings?
"Listen, you!" Mowgli cried. "There is no need for this
dog's jabber. Ye have told me so often tonight that I am a
man (though indeed I would have been a wolf with you to
my life's end) that I feel your words are true. So I do not
call ye my brothers any more, but sag [dogs), as a man
should."
—“Mowgli's Brothers," The Jungle Book,
Rudyard Kipling
HELP MEE

The purpose of the commentary in the underlined text is to give evidence of Stalin’s savage murders. Thus the correct option is A.

Evidence is referred to as proof based on factual information which helps to validate the occurrence of the event. It helps to determine whether the action took place or not by providing credentials.

The passage implies that the text's purpose was to represent Stalin's personality. Along with imprisoning people, he was the cause of a great number of deaths.

Therefore, option A  to give evidence of Stalin’s savage murders is appropriate.

Learn more about genocide, here:

brainly.com/question/9716424

#SPJ1

The author's argument is that adopting a pet dog from an animal shelter or rescue group is preferable to purchasing one from a breeder or pet store.

The author believes that adopting from a shelter or rescue group gives just as good — if not better — chance of getting a healthy and suitable pet than purchasing from a breeder or pet store. The author also argues that this is a more ethical option, as it prevents overcrowding in shelters, provides a second chance for animals in need, and helps to reduce the demand for commercially bred animals.

Furthermore, the author points out that shelters and rescues are often able to provide additional services such as training, health screenings, and spaying/neutering, meaning that adopting a pet from one of these organizations can actually save the adopter money in the long run.

Finally, the author argues that adopting a pet can be a very rewarding experience, as it can give an animal a second chance at a loving home.

To learn more about adopting a pet link is here

brainly.com/question/21109131

#SPJ1

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation: he asked me "Did i finish my work"?

Answer:

I'm not sure what you are asking

Explanation:

Under the heading "What Is on Their Dinner Menu?" one can find information about what sharks eat.

Sharks are opportunistic eaters, however, the majority of them prefer to eat smaller fish and crustaceans. Larger shark species have been known to feed on seals, sea lions, and other marine mammals.

Sharks are all at least somewhat carnivorous. Since most people only eat dinner every two to three days, they typically ingest between 0.5 and 3.0 percent of their body weight at each meal. Despite having well-developed bodies for collecting food, they have poor chewing abilities and require time to digest.

Similar to lions in the jungle, sharks at the top of the aquatic food chain have a significant influence on the species that live below them through their diet. For instance, if giant sharks went extinct, more octopuses would be around to feast on more lobsters as a result of the rise in the octopus population.

Therefore, The heading is "What Is on Their Dinner Menu?".

Learn more about Sharks, here;

https://brainly.com/question/14955486

#SPJ6

Answer:

should be (D) or (4)

Explanation:

Answer:

Based on the op-ed article by Lily Lou titled "The Downside of School Volunteer Requirements," it is clear that the author challenges the notion that volunteer requirements for high school graduation are beneficial. Lou argues that volunteer requirements are not an effective way to promote community service because they generate uninspired volunteers who are only interested in fulfilling requirements rather than making a meaningful contribution to their communities. Additionally, Lou contends that volunteer requirements can lead to stress and bias against low-income students, and they may also encourage students to pursue low-effort volunteer opportunities that do not make a significant impact in their communities.

To defend or challenge Lou's claims, it is important to conduct original research to support your argument. For example, if you were to defend Lou's claims, you could provide evidence that shows how volunteer requirements may lead to a reduction in long-term volunteering. Alternatively, if you were to challenge Lou's claims, you could provide evidence that suggests that volunteer requirements do have a positive impact on communities and that they encourage students to be more engaged citizens.

When conducting your research, it is important to use close reading strategies to carefully evaluate your sources and ensure that they are reliable and relevant to the topic at hand. Additionally, you should document your sources in a graphic organizer to help you organize your research and make connections between different pieces of evidence.

Once you have conducted your research, you should use your evidence to write a response to the op-ed article. Your response should either defend or challenge Lou's claims, and it should include original commentary that ties your evidence to your claims. Your commentary should demonstrate your understanding of the research you conducted and your ability to think critically about the topic. Finally, you should make sure to cite your sources properly to avoid plagiarism and give credit to the authors whose work you used to support your argument.

To write an essay that compares and contrasts how medium or historical and cultural context affects the plot, characterization, and theme of two stories from different cultures, it is important to consider the unique elements that each story brings to the table.

The medium of a story refers to the form in which it is presented, such as a novel, short story, or film. The medium can greatly impact how the plot, characterization, and theme are developed. For example, a novel may have more space to delve into complex plotlines and develop multidimensional characters, whereas a short story may focus on a single event or character to convey its message.

Historical context plays a significant role in shaping the plot, characterization, and theme of a story. The events, values, and social norms of a particular time period can influence how conflicts are resolved, characters behave, and the overall message of the story. For instance, a story set during a time of war may explore themes of sacrifice and resilience, while a story set in a post-industrial era may delve into themes of alienation and societal change.

Cultural context, which encompasses the beliefs, customs, and traditions of a specific culture, also impacts the plot, characterization, and theme. Different cultures have distinct storytelling traditions and themes that are rooted in their unique histories and experiences. For instance, a story from African folklore may incorporate themes of oral tradition and community, while a story from Japanese literature may explore themes of honor and duty.

In comparing and contrasting two stories from different cultures, it is important to analyze how their respective mediums, historical contexts, and cultural contexts shape their plot, characterization, and theme. By examining these factors, one can gain a deeper understanding of how different cultures approach storytelling and the impact it has on the overall narrative.

To know more about an essay

https://brainly.com/question/17448143

#SPJ11

In this book, Mr. T N. Mukharji relates to the account of his visit to Europe in 1886. He went as an agent of the Government of India to the Colonial and Indian Exhibition in London.

In this book, Mr. T. N. Mukharji recounts the narrative of his visit to Europe in 1886. He went as an agent of the Government of India to the Colonial and Indian Exhibition in London.

The selection recounts to a story in which Mukharji was sitting at a café, close to an Indian family. The family needed to converse with him, yet accepted that they proved unable, as he wouldn't grasp them.

The creator then depicts their unexpected when he moved toward them and they understood he communicated in English smoothly.

For more information about Mukharji, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/2562571

#SPJ2

Answer: Everyone there knew each other

Explanation:

John is to go to the town and inform them that Abby stated that "it had nothing to do with witchcraft." In essence, she wants John to travel to the city and inform the crowd that Abby is a fraud in order to put an end to the charges.

Elizabeth asks for these things in the hopes of righting wrong and preserving her own life. She also has a more sentimental goal in mind, which is to make John swear allegiance to her and cut all ties to Abigail. Elizabeth repeatedly requests that John travel to Salem, altering her request somewhat each time after learning more details about the court proceedings from Mary.

To know more about Abigail refer :

https://brainly.com/question/30248871

#SPJ11

In 'The Crucible', Elizabeth wants John to go to Salem and expose Abigail's lies to the court in order to save herself and other innocent people.

In Arthur Miller's play The Crucible, Elizabeth Proctor wants her husband John to go to Salem. There, she wants him to admit to the court that he is aware of Abigail Williams' lies. Abigail, the main accuser in the Salem witch trials, is a former servant of the Proctors who had an affair with John; she uses the trials as a means to seek revenge against Elizabeth. Elizabeth believes that John's testimony could save many innocent lives, including her own.

https://brainly.com/question/31414691

#SPJ12

Answer: Hamlet begins to act erratic and seems to have gone mad.

The events of Act Two in The Crucible affect readers' perception of the moral dilemma in which Proctor and the others find themselves by highlighting the danger of speaking out against the witch trials.

During the scene where Proctor confronts Abigail about her lies, Abigail threatens him with the knowledge that the court will take her accusations of witchcraft seriously and that Proctor himself can be accused. This serves to emphasize the power that Abigail wields and the fact that speaking out against the court is a dangerous thing to do. This is further highlighted in the scene where Proctor is brought to court and is threatened with death if he does not confess to witchcraft. In spite of being offered a chance to save his life, Proctor refuses to confess and instead chooses to speak out against the court and its injustices, risking his life in the process. This shows the reader the moral dilemma in which Proctor and the others find themselves, as they must choose whether to speak out and risk their lives or to remain silent and live.

To know more about emphasize refer :

brainly.com/question/27793721

#SPJ4

Answer:

round and dynamic

hope this helps! <3

Answer:

a thing is A but not sure

Explanation:

Answer:

A. He is well prepared, but needs to follow the rules of the discussion.

Explanation:

Good luck! :)

The type of feature article deals with any unusual experience writing in the first person of point of view is personal experience.

Personal experience articles are written upon the personal experience of any incident or travelling.

The options are attached here:

A. Personality Profile B. Personal Experience C. Personality Sketch D. Human Interest​.

Thus, the correct option is B. Personal Experience.

Learn more about personal experience articles.

https://brainly.com/question/22225901

#SPJ1

The additional directions that are needed to be aware of  as you plan, draft, and revise your comparative essay are:

When writing a comparative essay, it is important to note that you would have to make sure that you:

All of these are necessary if you want to write a good essay and make it pass the scholarly review.

Therefore, the correct answer is All of the above

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/13565178

Answer:

the correct answer is All of the above

Explanation:

2022 Answers This is right not wrong you can check the other answer if you think i'm not right.....

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

because I love helping others.

The author's viewpoint about Shakespeare is Shakespeare's works may not be original since they were published by his friends.

This refers to the perspective of a person about a particular thing that can affect the way he acts and behaves.

Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is the narration of the viewpoint of the author is that he believes that Shakespeare might not have been Shakespeare at all.

Read more about Shakespeare here:
https://brainly.com/question/7196518

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer:

i think b Rapidly reheated to 165 degrees F before placing in the steam table

Explanation:

The leftover foods to be re-used in a buffet should be refrigerated promptly and :

B) Rapidly reheated to 165 degrees F before placing in the steam table.

The leftover foods to be re-used in a buffet should be refrigerated promptly and rapidly reheated to 165 degrees F before placing in the steam table.

Repurposing scraps into unused dinners can make them a small more exciting.

Depending on the flavoring of the initial feast, you'll include remaining meat, vegetables or fish to fajitas, fricasseed rice, pasta sauce, soup or a casserole.

Thus, the correct answer is B.

Learn more about "Leftover food":

https://brainly.com/question/13207013?referrer=searchResults

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. If he were alive today, he would probably revise his theory of inartistic proofs to account for changes in society and technology.

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs are the means of persuasion which are not developed by the speaker, they include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. Each of these proofs has the ability to change the minds of an audience, even though they are not created by the speaker. However, if Aristotle were alive today, he may have revised these proofs to account for modern technology and changes in society. Here are some possible changes to Aristotle's inartistic proofs.

1. Laws: Aristotle's definition of laws would probably still hold up today. However, in modern society, there are more laws than ever before. Additionally, laws are now easier to access than they were in Aristotle's time, thanks to the internet. This may change the way people view the legitimacy of laws, since they are more visible than they were in the past.

2. Witnesses: Witnesses are still a powerful tool for persuasion. However, social media has changed the way we view witnesses. Today, there are more opportunities for people to share their stories, and more ways for others to verify them. This means that a witness's testimony may carry more weight than it did in Aristotle's time.

3. Contracts: Contracts are still important in modern society, but they are no longer the only way to establish agreements. For example, digital signatures and online agreements are now widely accepted. This means that contracts are less tangible than they used to be, which may change the way we view their authority.

4. Oaths: Oaths are still important in many contexts, but they are less commonly used than they were in the past. Today, people may be more likely to rely on other forms of proof, such as witnesses or contracts. However, oaths still hold a certain amount of authority, especially in legal contexts.

5. Torture: Torture is no longer an acceptable means of persuasion in modern society. If Aristotle were alive today, he would likely recognize this and revise his theory of inartistic proofs to exclude torture.

For more such questions on Aristotle, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24994054

#SPJ8

Answer:

The word/phrase "craving attention" in paragraph one indicates that the author believes that some critics have a negative viewpoint of selfies, stating that they are taken only by narcissists who crave attention. The author's point of view is that this opinion is not valid, and that these critics are out of touch with reality. The author implies that taking selfies and participating in social media is a normal and common activity, and that most people understand and appreciate it as a form of communication.

Answer:

The big difference Popper identifies between science and pseudo-science is a difference in attitude. While a pseudo-science is set up to look for evidence that supports its claims, Popper says, a science is set up to challenge its claims and look for evidence that might prove it false

Explanation:

hopes this answers your question.

The statement that best describes this passage is The author uses dialogue to introduce descriptive details to the reader.

A comprehension passage refers to writings words in which questions are given to help in understanding the write up well.

Therefore, The statement that best describes this passage is The author uses dialogue to introduce descriptive details to the reader.

Learn more about passage now.

https://brainly.com/question/24912155

#SPJ1

Answer:

option C

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

The main elements of a peer-reviewed research paper are the title, introduction, methodology, results etc.

The main elements of a peer-reviewed research paper can be explained as -

Title: A succinct, informative title that captures the study's main theme. An overview of the research topic, methods, major discoveries, and conclusions is given in this succinct synopsis of the study. It aids readers in swiftly comprehending the essential ideas of the study.

Introduction: An introduction that gives background information, identifies the research problem or question, and justifies the study's existence. A review of pertinent literature is also included to establish the research's context and significance.

Methodology: A thorough explanation of the study's methodology, research design, and processes. This part ought to contain enough details to enable others to conduct a similar investigation. Data collection, sample size, research tools, variables, and statistical analysis techniques are all covered in detail.

Results: Presentation of the conclusions reached after the data was collected and analysed. To bolster the findings, this part offers tables, figures, and statistical analysis. In order to make the results of the study easier to grasp, it should be impartial and well-structured.

Read more about research paper on:

https://brainly.com/question/26177190

#SPJ4

Answer:

To both European and Native American Shamanic people, Bear symbolizes awakening the strong force of the unconscious. The strength of bear medicine is the power to restore harmony and balance – to heal. The Bear Spirit is known to many cultures as the Great Healer. Bears are considered the Embodiment of Spiritual Power and Physical Strength.

Answer:

Hope this helps

Explanation:

In Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," Mr. Bennet is a character known for his sarcastic wit and cynical outlook on life. When his daughter Elizabeth is "crossed in love" by Mr. Darcy's initial proposal, Mr. Bennet comments, "An unhappy alternative is before you, Elizabeth. From this day you must be a stranger to one of your parents. Your mother will never see you again if you do not marry Mr. Collins, and I will never see you again if you do."

This statement reveals Mr. Bennet's detachment and lack of emotional investment in his daughter's life, which can be seen as a negative trait. However, it also shows that he recognizes the societal pressures placed on women to marry for financial security and social standing. His statement highlights the limited choices that women faced during the time period and the way that their happiness was often sacrificed for the sake of their family's well-being.

Furthermore, Mr. Bennet's use of humor and sarcasm can be seen as a defense mechanism to cope with his own unhappiness in his marriage. He married his wife, Mrs. Bennet, for her beauty and charm without truly considering her personality or intelligence. As a result, they have a strained relationship, and Mr. Bennet often retreats to his study to avoid her.

In conclusion, Mr. Bennet's commentary on women being "crossed in love" reveals his cynicism and detachment, but it also highlights his understanding of the limited choices that women faced during the time period. This character trait adds depth to Mr. Bennet's personality and helps to explain his use of humor and sarcasm as a coping mechanism.