Answers
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Trans-Missouri Freight Association case strengthen the federal government's power---- It upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads.
Federal government :The Federal Government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, respectively. There are hundreds of Federal agencies and commissions charged with handling responsibilities as varied as managing America’s space program, protecting its forests, gathering intelligence, and advancing the general welfare of the American people.
Trans-Missouri Freight Association :Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the Sherman Act (which was an antitrust measure that prohibited anti competitive behavior in commerce) applied to the railroad industry, even though the U.S. Congress had enacted a comprehensive regime .
Learn more about federal government power:
brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answers
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
Select the correct answer.
Which statement correctly describes a delinquent?
A.
a young person
B.
a young person who has committed a crime
C.
any person who has served a prison sentence
D.
any person who has faced a criminal trial
it criminology
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Deliquets are young kids who have commited crimes
Answer:
B.) a young person who has committed a crime
distinguish social behavior and legal behavior for example
Answers
Answer:
What is the difference between ethical behavior and legal behavior?
The distinction is important. Actions are 'legal' if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. ... A formally adopted code of ethics is a legal requirement; when you violate a state or local government code of ethics there are specific consequences.
Explanation:
is there legal harm suffered by marbury? is there a remedy at law? can the supreme court do anything? what is the power of the court?
Answers
First, it is important to understand that Marbury did suffer legal harm in the case of Marbury v. Madison. Marbury was appointed by President John Adams to serve as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, but his commission was not delivered before Adams left office.
Second, there is a remedy at law for Marbury's legal harm. Marbury could have filed a writ of mandamus, which would have ordered Madison to deliver the commission. However, the Supreme Court ultimately found that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which allowed for such writs to be filed directly to the Supreme Court, was unconstitutional. Therefore, Marbury was not able to obtain his remedy through the legal system.
Third, despite the fact that the Supreme Court could not provide a remedy for Marbury in this particular case, it is important to understand the power of the court. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts. Additionally, the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, which means that it can declare acts of Congress or the President unconstitutional. This power is what allowed the Supreme Court to declare the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional in the case of Marbury v. Madison.
To know more about Court visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ11
Can someone help me with this?
Case Description: You are a legal assistant who has been given the following paternity cases to review. It is your job to screen each case to see it there is any validity to the claim of an
"illegitimate" child and them make your recommendations to the lawyers for whom you work for. Proceed with your recommendations, indicating a "yes" or "no" result on the Case Analysis form for each potential case. Also, write out the genetic make-up. (letter combinations) for each case indicating why you choose "yes" or "no"
Answers
Answer & Explanation:
Case 1: No. The child's blood type is O, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and O. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.
Case 2: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents.
Case 3: No. The child's blood type is B, which cannot be produced from the combination of two B parents. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.
Case 4: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of O and O blood types from the parents.
Case 5: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and A blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A or AB.
Case 6: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of O and O blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A, B, or AB.
Case 7: Yes. The child's blood type is A, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents. The genetic make-up for the child in question would be AO, which can be produced from the combination of AB and B blood types from the parents.
what did political theorist john stuart mill argue for? A. freedom from government B. free traffic of ideas C. free love D. free access to healthcare
Answers
Political theorist John Stuart Mill argued for B. free traffic of ideas.
Mill believed in the importance of individual liberty and freedom of expression. He argued that individuals should be free to express their ideas and opinions without interference from the government or other authorities.
This freedom of expression, or "free traffic of ideas," is essential for the pursuit of truth and the development of society. Mill also believed that this freedom should extend to all aspects of life, including religion, politics, and personal relationships.
However, he did recognize the need for some limits on individual liberty, such as when one's actions harm others.
Hence Option B is correct.
For more similar questions on liberty:
brainly.com/question/30191259
#SPJ11
the only function of a will is to dispose of a person's property upon death.
T/F
Answers
The statement is true. A will is a legal document that outlines how a person's assets will be distributed after their death.
Its main purpose is to ensure that the deceased's wishes regarding their property are carried out according to their preferences and instructions. However, a will can also serve other functions such as appointing guardians for minor children, setting up trusts, and naming an executor to manage the estate. Nonetheless, the primary purpose of a will is to dispose of a person's property upon death. It is important to have a will in place to ensure that your assets are distributed according to your wishes and to avoid any disputes or legal challenges from your heirs.
To learn more about assets, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29416666
#SPJ11
In a will contest action, the decedent's children, who were not provided for in his will, claim that the decedent was not of sound mind at the time of executing the will. The plaintiffs' attorney calls as a witness the neighbor of the decedent, who was present when the will was executed but did not attest to the will. The attorney asks the neighbor to describe the decedent's mental state at the time of the will's execution. The neighbor states that the decedent appeared to be senile. The defense objects. How should the court rule?
Answers
The court should overrule the defense's objection and allow the neighbor's testimony. This is because the neighbor's testimony is relevant to the issue at hand, which is the decedent's mental state at the time of the will's execution.
The neighbor's observation of the decedent's behavior and mental state can provide valuable evidence for the court to consider when making a determination about the validity of the will. Furthermore, the neighbor was present at the time of the will's execution, which makes his testimony even more relevant and important. Therefore, the court should allow the neighbor's testimony and consider it as evidence in the case.
To know more about Decendent:
https://brainly.com/question/30428868
#SPJ11
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answers
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
identify the constitutional clause that is common to both greece v. galloway (2014) and engel v. vitale (1962)
Answers
The constitutional clause common to both Greece v. Galloway (2014) and Engel v. Vitale (1962) is the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution is the constitutional clause that is shared by both Greece v. Galloway (2014) and Engel v. Vitale (1962). The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing or endorsing a particular religion. In Engel v. Vitale, the Supreme Court ruled that school-sponsored prayer in public schools violated the Establishment Clause.
Similarly, in Greece v. Galloway, the Court addressed the issue of legislative prayer and emphasized that the government must not favor one religion over others or promote religious beliefs. Both cases involve the application and interpretation of the Establishment Clause in different contexts to ensure the separation of church and state in the United States.
To know more about Establishment Clause click here brainly.com/question/16362701
#SPJ11
What comprise a social class? how do clarify your family in terms of socio-economic status?
Answers
Answer:
social class, also called class , a group of people within a society who possess the same socioeconomic status. Besides being important in social theory, the concept of class as a collection of individuals sharing similar economic circumstances has been widely used in censuses and in studies of social mobility.
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT one of the criteria that makes a science scientific?
Answers
The idea is always true is not one of the criteria that makes science Scientific
What are scientific criteria?
The criteria for scientific science include empirical studies that can be repeatable to obtain result. It requires experimental designs and creative thinking.
Empirical research uses various observation, measurement of different variables as determined by the researcher. An experiencing can either agree with the hypothesis or disagree.
It is not always that scientific hypothesis formulated will be True.
Therefore, The idea is always true is not one of the criteria that makes science Scientific
Learn more on science below
https://brainly.com/question/17216882
#SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT one of the criteria that makes a science scientific?
The idea is observable.
- The idea is always true.
- The idea is testable.
- The idea is repeatable.
What is an advantage of filing a tax return?
A. Refundable tax credits can only be received by filing.
B. Filing federal taxes almost always results in a refund.
C. Completing federal tax forms correctly increases credit scores.
D. Employers regularly check tax returns as part of the hiring process.
Answers
Answer:
B refunds
Explanation:
This is because most or all refunds are used to pay back any taxes owed.
Why do so many defense lawyers engage in abuse of the discovery process while knowing that they risk the imposition of sanctions?
Answers
Answer:
.
Explanation:
What Would You Do?
You are the rookie. As you start working shifts on your own, you develop your own style of investigating crime, based on your
training. You are also beginning to get a handle on what your supervisor (your shift sergeant) expects from you in terms of report writing. Generally, his philosophy is that as long as you articulate the elements of the crime, he will pass the report along. He believes it's up to the prosecutor to clean up the reports and make the case. His patrol officers should be able to write reports quickly and get "back on the street. "For most patrol officers, especially rookies, having such a sergeant would be a dream.
However, you keep thinking about what your training officer regarded as one of the most valuable parts of training. Do you
decide to spend ample time on report writing or do you do only what is required to get by?
A. You take the time to make sure your reports are of the best quality you can produce. You
understand that your reports might be seen by many different professionals in the criminal justice
system, and you want them to be a reflection of your best work.
B. At this point in your career, you need street experience - and you want to take as many calls for service as you can and learn how to handle yourself and survive. There will always be time later to
develop writing skills. You write the minimum that is required by law and your supervisor.
Answers
Prioritize quality reports to showcase professionalism and ensure they reflect your best work for the criminal justice system. Therefore, the correct option is (A).
The correct option is (A):
As the rookie, you are faced with a decision regarding report writing. Option A suggests taking the time to ensure your reports are of the best quality possible. This approach acknowledges the importance of well-written reports, as they can be reviewed by various professionals in the criminal justice system. By producing high-quality reports, you aim to showcase your dedication and professionalism.On the other hand, Option B suggests prioritizing street experience and survival, focusing on taking as many calls for service as possible. This approach emphasizes the need to gain practical skills and knowledge while leaving the development of writing skills for a later time. The focus is on meeting the minimum requirements set by the law and your supervisor.Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities and the balance you wish to strike between building experience on the street and investing time in honing your report writing skills. Consider the long-term benefits of both options and how they align with your career aspirations in the law enforcement field.For more such questions on Professionalism:
https://brainly.com/question/15203170
#SPJ8
what type of citizen does a democracy need
Answers
Which of the following are consistent with Contractionary Fiscal Policy
Deficit
Lower Taxes
Lower Government Spending
Raise Taxes
Increase the Federal Debt
Surplus
Increase Government Spending
Decrease the Federal Debt
Answers
Answer:
Lower Government Spending
Raise Taxes
evaluate based on transformative constitutionalism
Answers
Answer: human dignity, equality, and freedom with a legal system
Explanation:
a court that will grant disestablishment, relieve the nonbiological father of past, future, and present support of the child.
Answers
The lower court granted only prospective relief, and the disestablished father appealed
Disestablishment of paternity is a complex legitimate matter and the administrations of an accomplished Family Law Attorney is fundamental to explore the court situation and backer for your privileges. The Remsen Family Law Firm is committed to quality and empathetic portrayal for separation and family law matters. In the event that you wish to challenge paternity, the cycle starts when the legitimate dad documents a Petition to Disestablish Paternity.
In a courtroom, disestablishment of paternity might be conceded under these conditions:
Assuming the kid's mom, biological dad and legitimate dad intentionally agree to change the status.
The lawful dad is testing paternity in light of newfound proof that he isn't the biological dad, ordinarily through DNA testing. In the event that the mother will not permit genetic testing of the kid, the legitimate dad can demand a court request for DNA testing.
At the point when the mother and lawful dad are not together, kid support installments should be current, except if there is a genuine justification for back payments.
The kid is younger than 18.
The kid has not been embraced by the legitimate dad.
The kid was not brought about by managed impregnation while the legitimate dad and mother were hitched.
The lawful dad permits the biological dad to practice his fatherly privileges, like appearance and having a relationship with the kid.
to know more about the DNA testing click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11745494
#SPJ4
The lower court granted only prospective relief, and the disestablished father appealed
Disestablishment of paternity is a complex legitimate matter and the administrations of an accomplished Family Law Attorney is fundamental to explore the court situation and backer for your privileges. The Remsen Family Law Firm is committed to quality and empathetic portrayal for separation and family law matters. In the event that you wish to challenge paternity, the cycle starts when the legitimate dad documents a Petition to Disestablish Paternity.
In a courtroom, disestablishment of paternity might be conceded under these conditions:
Assuming the kid's mom, biological dad and legitimate dad intentionally agree to change the status.
The lawful dad is testing paternity in light of newfound proof that he isn't the biological dad, ordinarily through DNA testing. In the event that the mother will not permit genetic testing of the kid, the legitimate dad can demand a court request for DNA testing.
At the point when the mother and lawful dad are not together, kid support installments should be current, except if there is a genuine justification for back payments.
The kid is younger than 18.
The kid has not been embraced by the legitimate dad.
The kid was not brought about by managed impregnation while the legitimate dad and mother were hitched.
The lawful dad permits the biological dad to practice his fatherly privileges, like appearance and having a relationship with the kid.
to know more about the DNA testing click here:
brainly.com/question/11745494
#SPJ4
which styles takes precedence over other stylesdefined in a in a
style sheet?
Answers
When different styles are defined in a style sheet, the cascading order determines which styles take precedence over other styles. In general, the most specific styles take precedence over more general styles.
In the cascading order, inline styles have the highest precedence, followed by styles defined in the internal style sheet and then styles defined in the external style sheet.The order of specificity is determined by the number of selectors in each rule. For example, a style defined for a specific element using an ID selector has a higher specificity than a style defined for all elements of a certain type using a class selector.
Styles defined later in the style sheet take precedence over styles defined earlier. This is known as the “last declaration wins” rule, and it can be overridden by using the !important keyword with a style declaration. When this keyword is used, the style is given the highest possible precedence and overrides any other style declarations for that element.
However, it is generally recommended to avoid using the !important keyword unless absolutely necessary to prevent issues with maintainability and readability of the code.
To know more about Style sheet visit-
brainly.com/question/32128409
#SPJ11
the exclusionary rule prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in a criminal case. although illegally seized evidence may prove the guilt of the accused, it
Answers
The majority of the evidence amassed in defiance of the US Constitution cannot be used by the government due to the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule is applicable to evidence.
What is criminal case punishment?The court's criminal law authority includes the ability to penalize, imprison, or release a defendant who has committed a crime. The defendant is regarded as either responsible or not liable in Civil Law cases.
Who brings criminal cases to court?You won't require legal representation to present your case in court because the designated prosecutor will present the accused. It is a great idea to have a compassionate lawyer you might talk to who is able to provide knowledgeable legal advice and support because the law or legal processes can be complicated.
To know more about Criminal case visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13409982
#SPJ4
(6)How can companies ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for
breaches of customary international law?
Answers
Companies can ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for breaches of customary international law by adhering to international legal standards and conducting thorough due diligence.
To mitigate the risk of lawsuits related to breaches of customary international law, companies should first familiarize themselves with the relevant international legal frameworks and norms. They should identify the specific customary international laws that apply to their operations, such as human rights, labor rights, and environmental protection. Once identified, companies should implement robust compliance programs that align with these standards.
A crucial step is conducting thorough due diligence throughout their supply chains and business operations. This includes assessing and monitoring potential risks, such as human rights abuses, environmental harm, or unethical practices. By identifying and addressing these risks proactively, companies can prevent or mitigate potential breaches of customary international law.
To know more about lawsuits
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
Answers
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Which statement explains the way historical events affected the development of values in American society?
American society is made up of people who can look back on events in U.S. history.
American national history covers many subjects, including the topic of American society.
The experience of events in U.S. history has shaped people’s values, which have shaped U.S. society.
The experience that comes from reading history has been valuable to many people in America.
Answers
Answer:
The experience of events in U.S. history has shaped people’s values, which have shaped U.S. society.
John Rawls' suggestion that society should reward behavior that provides the most benefit to the community as a whole is referred to as
Answers
John Rawls' suggestion that society should reward behavior that provides the most benefit to the community as a whole is referred to as Difference principle.
Which of the following best demonstrates how acting ethically benefits society as a whole?In all of our connections, trust is crucial, which is why ethical behavior is necessary.
What does John Rawls mean when he uses the phrase "veil of ignorance"?According to Rawls' theory, individuals cannot make objective decisions if they are aware of how their actions will effect them personally. Instead, they must be unaware of their place in society in order to formulate fair principles of distribution.
Which of the two forms of moral relativism in your text are they?According to moral relativists, there are moral facts, but they are either relative to an individual (personal moral relativism) or to the moral norms or conventions of the culture they originated from (this is known as cultural moral relativism).
To Know more about Difference principle.
https://brainly.com/question/30194976
#SPJ1
critics of the grand jury system argue that reform is needed for which reason?
Answers
Answer:
Grand juries often only hear evidence presented by the prosecutor when determining whether this is probable cause to issue and indictment
Explanation:
Critics of the grand jury system argue that reform is needed because:
Unauthorized disclosures of grand jury procedures have jeopardized the grand jury's mission, resulting in 343 witnesses' names being leaked before any indictments were issued, including 5 witnesses who were murdered, 10 witnesses who were intimidated, and 1 witness who disappeared.
Hence an alleged misuse of authority.
A grand jury is a group of individuals who are empowered by law to conduct legal processes, investigate possible criminal behavior, and decide whether criminal charges should be issued. A grand jury may call tangible evidence or a witness to testify. A grand jury is distinct from the courts and is not presided over by them.
Grand juries, which originated in England during the Middle Ages, are now only used in two countries: the United States and Liberia.
Other common law jurisdictions used to use them, but the majority of them now use an alternative method that does not include a jury: a preliminary hearing. Grand juries have both accusatory and investigative powers.
As indicated above, despite the relevance of the Grand Jury System, certain misuse of power called the attention of policymakers and stakeholders to the need to reform the system.
Learn more about Grand Jury:
https://brainly.com/question/14057837
#SPJ1
Amendment XX, section 1
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
In complete sentences, paraphrase the above amendment.
Answers
The given amendment is the 20th amendment of the US Constitution. It is paraphrased in complete sentences as given below.
The Twentieth Amendment is the amendment which sets the dates for the President, Vice President and members of Congress (Senators and Representatives). It sets the dates for when all these important personalities would take office.
The President and the Vice President shall start their jobs on 20th January. The members of Congress (Senators and Representatives) shall start their jobs on 3rd January.
Before this amendment, all of them started their jobs on 4th March. President Franklin Roosevelt was the first president who started his term in January.
To know more about 20th amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/13846279
#SPJ1
Answer:
What this amendment means is that all the terms that they have made have not been approved by, those that date then they will be ended, but if they have been, then the terms will arise.
Explanation:
What this assignment is asking is to paraphrase this amendment and a paraphrase is express the meaning of the writer or speaker or something written or spoken using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity. Which means for this assignment all you had to do is to put what you got out of the amendment.
How are social insurance programs different from public assistance programs like TANF?
Social insurance programs are means-tested, and only the poorest qualify for aid.
Social insurance programs involve voluntary participation, not participation that is mandated by the government.
Social insurance programs have the primary goal of reducing poverty, not stabilizing the economy.
Social insurance programs are funded by taxes paid by beneficiaries or their employers, not the general public.
Social insurance programs are available to all, not simply those who qualify.
Answers
Social insurance programs are different from public assistance programs like TANF as Social insurance programs are available to all, not simply those who qualify.
The eligibility requirements, funding sources, and objectives of social insurance programmes and public assistance programmes like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) are different. All people who meet certain requirements, such as attaining a particular age or paying into the system through payroll taxes, are often eligible for social insurance programmes like Social Security and Medicare.
Social insurance programme eligibility is typically not determined by need or income. In contrast, means-tested eligibility requirements are frequently present in public assistance programmes like TANF, requiring applicants to prove their financial need in order to receive assistance.
Learn more about Social insurance programs:
brainly.com/question/31955811
#SPJ1
At least 200 words per question. Just start me off with 100 words and ill finish the rest! THANKS GUYS!!
1. What common problems have existed throughout the centuries for people in law enforcement?
2. Why was there no law enforcement during the daytime for many centuries?
3. What are some of the challenges law enforcement will face with intelligence-led policing as it emerges in the new era of policing?
Answers
Answer:
uhhhhh how am i supposed to know this??? u can look it up on the internet lol