PLEASE HELP
Which of the following can help the judge in deciding the severity of a sentence?
a. The opening statements
b. A victim impact statement
c. The witness testimony
d. The final argument
Answer:
The correct answer is b. A victim impact statement.
Explanation:
A victim impact statement is a statement made by the victim or their representative during the sentencing phase of a criminal trial. It provides the victim with an opportunity to express the emotional, physical, and financial impact of the crime on their life. This information can be relevant to the judge in determining the severity of the sentence, as it allows the judge to consider the harm caused to the victim and the community as a result of the crime.
While the other options, including a. opening statements, c. witness testimony, and d. final arguments, can provide valuable information to the judge during a trial, they may not necessarily be directly related to determining the severity of a sentence. The victim impact statement, on the other hand, is specifically designed to inform the judge about the impact of the crime on the victim, which can be a factor in determining the appropriate sentence for the offender.
1. Define the main concept of Warrior vs. Guardian training.
2. What are some reasons for the shift toward a warrior mindset and prevent a guardian culture?
Answer:
1.The warrior concept is associated with the idea of militarizing policing and is consistent with the traditional view of police work -- to search, chase and capture. However, the newer concept of guardian policing emphasizes social service, valuing community partnerships and establishing positive contacts.
2.
Explanation:
Im sorry only number 1 i can answer sorry!
But hope the number 1 it helps!
In Texas, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when _______________
In Texas, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when you are caught speeding in a work zone.
What is Work Zone?An region of a trafficway containing construction, maintenance, or utility work is known as a work zone. Signs, channeling systems, barriers, pavement markers, and/or work vehicles are frequently used to designate a work zone.
The standard fine is doubled if you are caught speeding in a construction zone. If there are any construction employees present, the penalties may be as high as $1,000. A $200 fine is assessed for driving in a construction zone. A speeding violation in a construction zone can result in fines of more than $2,000 in some cases.
Therefore, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when an any work is in progress or construction workers are present.
To learn more about Work Zone, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3909716
#SPJ2
each year, nearly twice as many people are ____ as are ____.
Each year, nearly twice as many people are killed in automobile accidents as are murdered. Option A is the correct answer.
When a vehicle collides with another vehicle, a person, an animal, road debris, or another moving or stationary barrier, such as a tree, pole, or building, the result is a traffic accident, also known as a motor vehicle collision (or car crash if vehicles are involved in the collision). Option A is the correct answer.
Accidents involving cars frequently result in harm to individuals and things, and also financial expenses to civilization and those impacted. The most hazardous condition that individuals encounter on a regular basis is road travel, although the number of casualties from such accidents receives less media coverage than that of other, less common sorts of disaster.
Learn more about Accident here:
https://brainly.com/question/1475503
#SPJ4
The complete question is, "Each year, nearly twice as many people are ____ as are ____.
a. killed in automobile accidents; murdered
b. kidnapped; killed in automobile accidents
c. murdered; kidnapped
d. murdered; killed in automobile accidents
If a judge bases his or her final decision on existing law, it is an example of common law; what is the decision called that a judge arrives at from a case with unique circumstances?
Answer:
Explanation:
A prior ruling or judgment on any case is known as a precedent.
bubba weldon houma louisiana divorce
Answer:
no
Explanation:
yes they were right hahaaaaaaa
How was the scopes trial representative of life in the united states in the 1920s?.
The trial was viewed as an opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of the bill, to publicly advocate for the legitimacy of Darwin's .
The Scopes Trial, otherwise called the Scopes Monkey Trial, was the 1925 indictment of science educator John Scopes for showing development in a Tennessee state funded school, which a new bill had made unlawful. The trial included two of the most popular speakers of the period, William Jennings Bryan and Clarence Darrow, as contradicting lawyers. The trial was seen as an amazing chance to challenge the legality of the bill, to openly advocate for the authenticity of Darwin's hypothesis of development, and to improve the Status of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
to know more about the Civil Liberties click here:
https://brainly.com/question/509851
#SPJ4
Civil law tradition is not used at any place in Canada, only
Common law is used. True or False
False. Canada has a dual legal system that includes both the Common Law tradition and the Civil Law tradition.
The Common Law tradition is primarily used in most provinces and territories in Canada, including English-speaking provinces such as Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta. Common Law is based on case law and legal precedent developed through judicial decisions.
However, the province of Quebec follows the Civil Law tradition, which is derived from French civil law principles. The Civil Law system is based on a comprehensive legal code that outlines rights, obligations, and rules governing various aspects of civil life. Quebec's Civil Code, known as the Civil Code of Quebec, is the primary legislation that governs civil matters in the province.
Therefore, it is incorrect to say that the Civil Law tradition is not used in any place in Canada. Quebec, with its distinct legal system, applies the Civil Law tradition alongside the Common Law tradition found in the rest of Canada.
Learn more about Civil Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ11
for the purpose of effective internal control, postdated checks received from customers should be
For the purpose of effective internal control, postdated checks received from customers should be handled and recorded with specific considerations.
Firstly, it is crucial to segregate the handling of postdated checks from regular cash receipts to prevent accidental deposit or recording errors. This separation ensures that postdated checks are not treated as current cash and avoids potential misstatements in financial records.
Secondly, a clear and accurate record-keeping system should be established to track postdated checks separately. This allows for easy identification and monitoring of these checks, ensuring that they are properly accounted for and not overlooked during the normal cash deposit process.
Additionally, it is important to establish controls to prevent premature deposit or negotiation of postdated checks. These controls may include clearly marking the checks as postdated, communicating their status to relevant personnel, and implementing procedures to ensure they are held securely until the appropriate date for deposit.
Regular reconciliation of postdated checks should also be conducted to ensure that they are accounted for and appropriately reflected in financial statements. This reconciliation process helps identify any discrepancies or issues related to postdated checks and enables prompt resolution.
By implementing these internal control measures, businesses can effectively manage and safeguard postdated checks received from customers. These controls help prevent errors, ensure accurate financial reporting, and maintain the integrity of the company's cash management processes.
Learn more about postdated here
https://brainly.com/question/27960337
#SPJ11
Joe is overheard stating that he could make a lot of money robbing a local bank that has no security guards on duty. Joe may be criminally charged with
Answer:
yes he can get locked up for life if and add more things if he has drugs or guns on him make sure that he gets the money for the back also tell him to tell the tellers to get away from the desks so they do not push the button goof luck and FTP
Explanation:
Joe is overheard stating that he could make a lot of money robbing a local bank that has no security guards on duty. Joe may be criminally charged with no crime.
What is a criminal charge?A criminal charge is a formal accusation levelled by a governmental authority that someone has committed a crime.
A charge in a criminal case is a formal accusation of criminal activity. After reviewing police reports, witness statements, and any other evidence of wrongdoing, the prosecuting attorney decides on the charges. At the arraignment of an arrested person, formal charges are announced.
As, Joe is just overheard stating that he could make a lot of money robbing a local bank that has no security guards on duty, but he has still not committed that crime, he has no criminal charge.
Thus, Joe is not charged for any crime.
To learn more about criminal charge, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10387458
#SPJ2
law for admitting new states to the united states, territories govern themselves is called___
Northwest Ordinance is the statute governing the admission of new states to the union and the self-government of territories.
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union, but none may be formed or established within the jurisdiction of any other State, nor may any State be formed by the Junction of Two or More States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned.
Nothing in this Constitution shall be interpreted in a way that prejudges any claims of the United States or of any particular State. The Congress shall have the authority to dispose of and make all necessary rules and regulations regarding the Territory or other property belonging to the United States. Id. at 1665. View Art. II.
Learn more about territories Visit: brainly.com/question/29038837
#SPJ4
What candidate was preferred in 2000 and why?
Answer:
Republican candidate George W. Bush, the governor of Texas and eldest son of the 41st president, George H. W. Bush, won the election, defeating incumbent Vice President Al Gore.
Explanation:
The principle of _______ requires all lower courts, such as trial courts, to follow the case precedent, meaning that any similar case from that point in time onward would be decided according to the _______. Multiple select question. precedent
The principle of precedent requires all lower courts, such as trial courts, to follow the case precedent, meaning that any similar case from that point in time onward would be decided according to the precedent.
It also known as stare decisis, is a legal principle that states that courts are bound to follow the legal rules established by earlier court decisions that are similar to the present case. The principle of precedent requires all lower courts, such as trial courts, to follow the case precedent.
It means that any similar case from that point in time onward would be decided according to the precedent. In other words, the precedent is a legal principle that obligates judges to respect the legal decisions of previous cases to establish consistency in the legal system.
Learn more about precedent Visit : brainly.com/question/29618649
#SPJ11
A lawmaker helping a constituent obtain US citizenship is an example of
lobbying
????????????????????
Which of the following best illustrates an application of Newton’s First Law (also called the Law of Inertia)? A A passenger not wearing a seatbelt is ejected from an automobile during a severe crash. B Dinner plates remain on a table when a slick tablecloth is pulled out from underneath them. C An ice hockey puck continues sliding across the relatively frictionless ice until it comes into contact with a wall or a player’s stick. D All of these are examples of Newton's First Law.
Answer:
D. All of the Above
Explanation: Newton’s first law is “An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force” So if a pencil is rolling on a table and you stop it with you hand instead of letting it roll of the table in this case, the pencil is the object in motion and you are the unbalanced force.
Newton's first law described the relationship between the motion of object and the respective forced that acting on it.
Newton’s First Law
Correct option is D.
Under Newton's first law if the body of person keep constant for long period of time, it will automatically remain at rest.A dinner plate remain on a table for a long period of time at the time of slick tablecloth is pulled, then the plate object in motion and we are in the Unbalanced force.Therefore, correct option is D.
Learn more about Newton's First Law, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11677209
what is the difference between business private law and business public law
Answer:
Private law applies to relationships between individuals in a legal system.e.g. contracts and labor laws.
Public law applies to the relationship between an individual and the government.
Feel free to ask questions :)
2.2 How can the involvement of community structures contribute towards solving burglaries in the area? (10)
Here, Community structures refers to an uniformed & authorized way of buildings layout, road routes, railroad etc, which follows the community plan.
In other word, the structures refers to the internal structure of an area, town, city etc.Community structures brings about the organization and arrangement of our society.When community plan takes in consideration Act of Burglary, then, the introduction of Police-Check point at every Street will be paramount.
In conclusion, the involvement of this plan is important in solving burglaries problems because its instills Fear of security and thus discourage attempted burglary from occupant of the community.
Read more on this here
brainly.com/question/24447737
true or false: in the event of a conflict between hipaa and state law, state law preempts hipaa unless hipaa isstricter.
The statement that "in the event of a conflict between HIPAA and state law, state law preempts HIPAA unless HIPAA is stricter" is true. However, let us have an in-depth explanation.In the United States, HIPAA and state law regulate the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI).
The privacy regulations apply to most covered entities, which include health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers. However, in certain cases, state law requirements can conflict with HIPAA's requirements.If HIPAA regulations and state law requirements conflict, the requirements of the stricter law will apply.
This indicates that the federal law does not pre-empt the state law when it comes to healthcare privacy laws unless the federal law, HIPAA, has stricter provisions than the state law in question. In other words, if a state law is stricter than HIPAA's regulations, the state law will take precedence and must be followed by healthcare providers.
To know more about PHI visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31930738
#SPJ11
When receiving food can refuse to accept it when if
Explanation:
the food is moldy, the food is something you are ALERGIC to, something that is bad for you
Chemicals used to manufacture methamphetamine can also be used to remove inked writing from checks stolen from the mail.
Select one:
True
False
Discuss one way English Common Law has influenced our modern democratic institutions and procedures.
The right to one's own privacy may be traced back to English common law just as much as it can be found in the Constitution. This is one of the reasons why the 9th and 10th Amendments were included in the Constitution. They are around in part because of the common law that existed before it.
This is further explained below.
What is the right to privacy?Generally, The concept of an individual's inalienable right to privacy may be found in a number of different legal systems. This right is designed to put a stop to governmental and private acts that violate the privacy of persons. The right to one's privacy is recognized in more than 150 country constitutions.
In conclusion, the right of an individual not to have things of a personal nature made public against their will or to be the subject of intrusion by other people.
Read more about the right to privacy
https://brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ1
according to the civil rights act of 1964 reading, there are partial and whole exceptions to title vii for _ types of employers
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 lost much of its ability to safeguard civil rights when the United States Supreme Court decided in the famous 1883 Civil Rights Cases that Congress lacked the authority to forbid discrimination in the private sector. The legal rationale for invalidating the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was part of a broader tendency by justices of the United States Supreme Court to do so in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with the exception of laws intended to safeguard conventional public morality. The majority of the Supreme Court justices progressively changed their legal theory in the 1930s, during the New Deal, to allow for more government regulation of the private sector.
learn more about civil rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/21057720
#SPJ4
Why do you think a credit card company would agree to lend people money to buy things before they p ay for them
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
What informs firearms and their projectiles?Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.
From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.
From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.
Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650
#SPJ1
How does Vicksburg Firearms try and back up their case in the courtroom (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?
In order to get the importance of the Vicksburg Firearms in the case, it's important to understand the context clues and the inference that can be deduced.
What are context clues?Your information is incomplete as you didn't provide the passage it case. Therefore, an overview will be given.
Context clues simply means the hints that are provided by the author in a literary work.
It's important to read and understand the story given first. Then, analyze the context clues given in the story. This is important to understand how Vicksburg Firearms back up their case in the courtroom.
Learn more about context clues on:
https://brainly.com/question/24750804
Phoenix Inc. is a publisher. Phoenix uses a logo featuring a bird rising from a flame to identify its publications. The publications are printed in a unique process that includes a 3-D printer. Phoenix could most likely obtain trademark protection for its a. logo. b. publications. c. printing process. d. printer.
Phoenix's logo could be eligible for trademark protection. Keep in mind that the printing process is largely internal and is patentable at any moment. However, a logo distinguishes it from rival newspapers and provides buyers with a means of identifying authentic Phoenix articles. Phoenix is therefore most likely to have its logo protected under trademark law.
what is patentable?
An invention is patentable in the sense of a national or international body of law if it satisfies the necessary legal requirements for a patent to be issued. By extension, the term "patentability" also refers to the requirements that must be satisfied in order for a patent to be upheld as legitimate. The word "patentability" typically only refers to "substantive" requirements rather than formal requirements like "sufficiency of disclosure," "unity of invention," or "best mode requirement."
One part of a patent examiner's formal examination of a patent application that may be put to the test in post-grant patent litigation is determining patentability.
learn more about patentable-https://brainly.com/question/29357302
#SPJ4
Write a two- to three-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast the structure and function of the national government with the structure and function of New Hampshire's/States government. Use what you’ve learned about the national government and do research to find out more about your state government. Include the following in your essay:
The structure of national and state government
The functions of national and state government
The distribution of power between national and state government, including the purpose of Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution
Current state leaders and the roles and functions they perform within state government
National and state governments have similar structures and functions,with power distribution defined by the U.S. Constitution.
The Essay
The national government and New Hampshire's state government share a three-branch structure,with executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
They have distinct functions,such as law enforcement, lawmaking, and law interpretation. Power distribution is defined by the U.S. Constitution, including Article IV, Section 4,which guarantees a republican form of government in each state.
New Hampshire's current state leaders, including the Governor,perform crucial roles in executing state laws and managing government affairs.
Learn more about structure of government at:
https://brainly.com/question/22236084
#SPJ1
Discuss the pros and cons of raising children in correctional institutions. How you expand or limit such programs?
Answer:
Explanation:
While systemic reforms ultimately rely on government policies and action, individuals can play a role as well. Initiatives such as the Harvard Organization for Prison Education and Reform and the Petey Greene Program, for example, send trained volunteers to tutor incarcerated individuals with the dual goal of advocating for structural reforms to prison education. Volunteering to tutor students in prison who are working toward their GEDs will reap rewards for students, tutors, and society.
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
Most of the people in the line of presidential succession serve in which body?
The House of Representatives
The Cabinent
(gradpoint)
Answer:
The Cabinent
Explanation:
Only a couple are not in the President's Cabinet