Answer:
Can you do it in English
HELP WILL GIVE MOST BRAINILIST!!!
Answer: B is the correct answer
Explanation: I took the quiz and got it right. Plessy vs. Ferguson helped the united states allow segregation calling it constatuitional.
Was the ruling that the president could not use executive privilege to prevent the tapes from being turned over a good decision ?
A key precedent that restricts the ability of any U.S. president to use executive privilege is United States v. Nixon. President Warren E.
Who was President Warren E.?Warren G. Harding, whose full name is Warren Gamaliel Harding, was the 29th president of the United States (1921–1923). He was born on November 2, 1865, in Corsica, Ohio (now Blooming Grove), and passed away on August 2, 1923, in San Francisco, California. Harding won the president with the largest popular vote margin ever, promising a nostalgic "return to normalcy" after World War I.
Vice President Calvin Coolidge succeeded him after he passed away in his third year in office. However, his brief term in office saw little of significance accomplished, and soon after his passing, a string of scandals condemned the Harding administration to be remembered as one of the worst in American history.
Learn more about President Warren E here:
https://brainly.com/question/1291396
#SPJ2
what does the judge do when link deas speaks up in support of tom?
This is Ethics class question.
How does the legal inequity of America's past affect inequity
that remains across ethnic lines today? please answer it in essay
form and cited it.
The racial inequality that was prevalent in America's past has remain across the ethnic lines of today and we can see from the incidents from the various incidents that took place in America. Even though great leaders have fought for the inequality still we could identify such acts for instance during the George Floyd's case.
Racial inequality in a society refers to the unequal distribution of resources, power, and economic opportunity across races. While the discussion of racial inequality in the United States is often focused on economic inequality, racial inequality manifests itself in a variety of ways that impact the well-being of all Americans both individually and collectively. This includes disparities in wealth, education, employment, housing, mobility, health, incarceration rates, and other areas.
Learn more about inequality, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28774329
#SPJ4
what dose the president of the united states do?
Explanation:
joe biden
hope it helpful for you
mark me as brainliest
XxinstaprincixXAnswer:
Mark me brianliestExplanation:
The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet. The Vice President is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency should the need arise. (⌒▽⌒)(⌒▽⌒)(⌒▽⌒)What would happen if you do not obey the law and then not obey a SWAT officer
Disobeying a law order of a police officer carries higher penalties to those who refuse to follow orders lawfully issued by an officer of the law. It’s a second-degree misdemeanor, meaning its punishable by up to 60 days in jail, six months of probation and/ or a $500 fine.
Explanation:
Under proposed regulations issued by the Treasury Department, in which of the following situations should an LLC member be treated as a general partner for self-employment tax purposes?A. The member is not personally liable for any of the LLC debt.B. The member has authority to contract on behalf of the LLC.C. The member spends 450 hours participating in the management of the LLC's trade or business during the taxable year.D. The member is listed on the LLC's letterhead.
According to the proposed regulations issued by the Treasury Department, an LLC member should be treated as a general partner for self-employment tax purposes if they meet condition C, which is spending 450 hours participating in the management of the LLC's trade or business during the taxable year.
Conditions A, B, and D do not affect the determination of whether an LLC member is treated as a general partner for self-employment tax purposes.
Under the proposed regulations issued by the Treasury Department, an LLC member should be treated as a general partner for self-employment tax purposes in the following situation: C. The member spends 450 hours participating in the management of the LLC's trade or business during the taxable year.
Visit here to learn more about business brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ11
Is the type of the exception object always the same as the type declared in the catch clause that catches it? if not, why not?.
No, The type of any exception object is not at all same. we can say it as super class for the given sub class which is very well enough to catch all the clause which catches it.
If an exception does now no longer have an identical seize clause, the present day approach terminates and throws the exception to the subsequent better level. If there's no matching seize clause at any better level, then this system terminates with an error. Your software can do something with the exception item that it chooses to.
A seize clause can seize any exception that can be assigned to the Throwable type. This consists of the Error and Exception types. One such exception is the restriction exception ( System. Limit Exception ) that the runtime throws if a governor restriction has been exceeded, which include while the most variety of SQL queries issued has been exceeded.
Learn more about exception visit: brainly.com/question/29526741
#SPJ4
What is the legal threshold in criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction?.
The legal threshold in a criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction is to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt.
What is Reasonable Doubt?Reasonable doubt is a legal standard which a prosecution team must attain in order to secure the conviction of a person on trial.
Reasonable doubt means that the prosecution must present to the court all admissible evidence to prove that a person on trial actually committed that crime and that all the evidence provided must have been obtained through an admissible means.
What is a ConvictionConviction is the formal verdict which is issued by the jury in a competent court of jurisdiction that the accused of a crime is found guilty of that crime.
This means that the jury must have taken in to consideration the evidence set before it by both the defense and the prosecution team and that they have voted amongst themself and the number of votes for conviction outweighs the other.
Learn more about Reasonable Doubt at https://brainly.com/question/27077531
#SPJ1
Which person is a victim of identity theft?
Suzie, whose e-mail was stolen and used to apply for a credit card from a major retailer
Michael, whose credit score was stolen and used to make a down payment on a home
Pam, whose smartphone was stolen and used to make a mortgage payment
Thomas, whose credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store
Answer:
thomas
Explanation:
just did test
Thomas is a victim of identity theft because his credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store.
What is identity theft?Identity theft happens when someone commits fraud or another crime using another person's personal information—such as their name, identification number, or credit card number—without that person's consent. In 1964, the phrase "identity theft" was first used. Since that time, both the U.K. and the U.S. have statutory definitions of identity theft that include the theft of personally identifiable information.
Identity theft purposefully utilizes someone else's identity as a technique to acquire financial advantages or obtain credit and other benefits, and potentially to create other person's disadvantages or loss. When someone's identity is stolen, bad things can happen to them, especially if they are wrongly accused of being the offender.
Therefore, Thomas is an victim of identity theft.
To learn more about identity theft, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29898436
#SPJ7
Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
a) Only with respect to Criminal Procedural Rights.
b) Only with respect to Civil Liberties.
c) They cannot provide fewer rights to individuals.
d) They can provide fewer rights to individuals.
what changes did beccaria propose to correct abuses in the justice system?
Answer:
Beccaria proposed to abolish torturing of witnesses and suspects, irregular proceedings in trials, and punishments that were unfair and cruel.
Explanation:
(1.0 p)
Which situation would most likely lead to a civil case?
A person deserts their post on a military base.
B.
A person is caught breaking into a house.
C.a person is not allowed to get a raise at work because they are a woman.
D.a person fails to stop at a red light.
Question 2
Prior notice deposit means bank shall returns the deposited amount without need for notice from customer
А
True
B
False
Explain the types of surveillance in criminal investigations:
The 4 principal methods for conducting a moving surveillance on foot are one-officer surveillance; two-officer surveillance; the ABC method; and the progressive or leapfrog method.
What are the principal methods in conducting foot surveillance? Which is the most effective?
Covert and overt surveillance is conducted in the case of criminal investigations.
What are covert and overt surveillance?Investigations into industrial crime, insurance fraud, and other criminal activities frequently involve the use of covert and overt surveillance as a helpful and effective method for learning more about an individual or organization.
In contrast to overt surveillance, which uses technologies that are evident and visible, covert surveillance is conducted without the target's awareness.
The finest outcomes are always given by utilizing a variety of approaches, such as mobile surveillance, static observation, and the deployment of covert surveillance equipment. All of our agents have years of experience, are highly competent, and have backgrounds in the police or military. Trademark surveillance agents are trained to utilize specialized tools, like hidden body cameras and GPS tracking systems.
Therefore, Covert and overt surveillance are conducted in the case of criminal investigations.
Read more about surveillance, here
https://brainly.com/question/14895186
#SPJ1
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1
a witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation.
T/F
True, a witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation. This is because witnesses have testimonial immunity, which protects them from defamation lawsuits while providing testimony.
This statement is generally true. Witnesses who testify in court or before a legislature are generally protected by a privilege from being sued for defamation for statements they make while testifying. This privilege is based on the idea that it is important to encourage witnesses to speak candidly and freely without fear of being sued for their statements. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as if the witness acted with malice or made statements outside the scope of their testimony.
Learn more about defamation: https://brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ11
One of the key tactics of the Civil Rights Movement was the widespread use of civil disobedience. This form of peaceful protest is practiced to this day. When can it be effective? When can it backfire?
Genital features useful in assessing a woman’s sexual
history
Answer:
a thorough physical examination of the reproductive tract includes a complete history, general physical examination, and evaluation of the external and internal genitalia. Ancillary tests that can be applied to this system include uterine culture, biopsy, cytology, and lavage.
THE CASE OF JACOB AND THE DISEASED LEG Jacob is an outstanding quarterback on his high school footboli team who has been offered a colleqe scholarahip when he praduates, Unfortinutely. Jacob was injured duting a tate bummer practice just before his serior year. He sutfered a compound fracture of the foula bone in his lower leg. Since the fracture broke through his skin, he requered a surgical repair to asgn or set the bone and close the skin. Dr. Mi, an orthopedic surgeon, kept Jacob in the hospital for three days and ordered intravenous antibietics to be administered. When he was diacharged from the hospital, Jacob was told to come in for an office visit once a week for aix weeks At six weeks Jacob's parents took him into the surgeon's office for his cast removal, and excopt for a slightly infiamed and draining area around his stitches, Jacob's broken bone seemed to be healing After his cast was removed, Jacob was told to wait for a ferw minutes while the surgeon went acioss the hall to check on another patient. Dr. M. removed his gloves, washed his hande in Jacob's exam room. and then went actoss the hall to examine another pationt, Sarah K. The doors between the exam fooms were left open and Jacob's pareate could see and hear Dr. M examise Sarah's intected leg. They coukd tel that Dr. M did not repiace his gloves. He tosd Sarah that he was glad to see that her osteomyeltis (a sericus bore infection) Was almost better and he told her to come back in another week, Di. M. then came back into Jacob's room, stat witheut gloves, and examined Jaccb's leg more carefully He was concerned about the inflammation around the incision site and toid the parents to keep the area clean and dry. He wrote Jacob a prescription for an oral antibiotic and said he could start to put a litle weight on his leg. When Jacab carme back the foliowing week. his leg was grossly infected with a large abscess Jacoo had to have further sargary to drain the abscess. The pathology report of tissue specimens from Jacobs led determined that he had developed oateomyelisis. This intection fook several mentha to heal. The delay in his fecovery neant that Jacob was unable to play football that fall and lost his chance at a college schotarship Jacobs parents asked Dr. M to provide them with the results of the tissue test. They. then sued Dr. M. for negigencer. 1. What obvious mistake cid Dr. M make? 2. Did dacob or his parents contribute in any way to his condition? 3. What could at of the involved parties have done to prevent this sitisation from occurting? 4. Discuss what the term standard of care meand tor someone in your protession
The clear error made by Dr. M was not cleaning themselves properly and not taking steps to prevent infections.
What obvious mistake cid Dr. M make?He did not change his gloves after looking at Sarah's infected leg before looking at Jacob's leg, which probably caused the infection in Jacob's leg.
According to the information given, it seems that Jacob and his parents did not cause his condition. They did what the doctor said and went to get help from medical professionals as they were told to do. They did things that showed they wanted to get the right treatment and make sure things were watched closely.
Read more about mistake here:
https://brainly.com/question/29626623
#SPJ1
lee Isaías 25,6-10 y encuentra dos comparaciones entre el banquete que describe
el profeta y la gloria que nos espera .
comparación 1
comparación 2
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Pues revisando la información solicitada, podemos hacer las siguientes comparaciones.
1.- En ese versículo, el profeta Isaías hace referencia a la metáfora de la montaña, en donde existe un gran banquete para los elegidos de Dios en la cima. Habla de las delicias que le esperan a los fieles de Dios como recompensa a sus acciones. Algo así como el premio del señor después de una vida entregada a él.
Podemos encontrar una idea similar, pero ésta se encuentra en el Nuevo Testamento, en el evangelio de Lucas, cuando el evangelista se refiere a que Jesús invita a los fieles a comer y gozar del reino de los cielos.
2.- La segunda comparación es cuando el profeta Isaías hace referencia a que Dios consolará a sus fieles en el cielo, después de la muerte. Ahí, dice Isaías, el humano ya no sentirá dolor ni sufrimiento como lo sentía en la Tierra.
De igual manera, en Corintios, dentro del Nuevo Testamento, se hace referencia a que Cristo vencerá a sus enemigos y reinará por siempre en el reino de los cielos, en donde el humano podrá vencer a la muerte como Jesús lo hizo.
On review of an agency’s interpretation of the law, a court is
likely to defer to the agency’s view under Chevron, unless
it is arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the
statute.
Courts should respect reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous provisions of congressional acts under Chevron, unless those interpretations are clearly unreasonable, capricious, or arbitrary.
In certain situations, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should respect an agency's interpretation of a statute unless they find it to be "arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute." Skidmore deference allows a federal court to choose the appropriate level of deference for each case based on the agency's capacity to support its interpretation, as opposed to Chevron deference, which mandates that a federal court defer to an agency's interpretation of an ambiguous statute if the interpretation is thought to be reasonable.
Read more about agency’s interpretation at
https://brainly.com/question/29972706
#SPJ4
Suppose that you are a prison warden. What if a group of incarcerated individuals calling themselves the “Sons of Purple Flower” and claiming to be a religious organization requested a special diet when the moon is full as part of their First Amendment rights? How would you determine whether you must grant these requests
Answer:
if they need an altered diet for religious reasons it shall be granted. religious freedom still applies in prison. alternative meals for christians and muslims are granted, so id assume the same thing applies.
How can experts match a bullet to a specific make or model of gun?
what is the phrase for thece rrof scientific research in gh
Answer:
Never give up on the grind
If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.
Explanation:
What qualities is news supposed to have? Mark all that apply.
Dramatic
Boring
Timely
Compelling
Delayed
Without bias
Account of events
The qualities that news is supposed to have are timely, compelling, without bias, and an account of events.
The qualities that news is supposed to have are timely, compelling, without bias, and an account of events.
Timeliness is crucial for news as it aims to provide information promptly, keeping the audience informed about current events.
News should be compelling to engage and captivate the audience, presenting information in an interesting and impactful manner.
Being without bias is essential for news to maintain its credibility and objectivity. It should present facts and multiple perspectives without favoring any particular viewpoint.
News should provide an accurate account of events, reporting on what happened, where, when, and why, striving for factual accuracy and thoroughness.
Dramatic or boring are subjective qualities that may vary based on individual preferences and the nature of the story. However, the focus should be on delivering accurate and relevant information rather than manipulating the story's dramatic or entertaining aspects.
Delayed news contradicts the purpose of timely reporting, as it should aim to provide up-to-date information. Therefore, delayed news is not a desirable quality.
For more such question on qualities
https://brainly.com/question/24718712
#SPJ11
Discuss criticisms of separation of powers
Answer:
One criticism of separated powers is that it can also result in weak government, especially if the legislative and executive branches are controlled by different political parties.
Explanation:
Answer:
The criticisms of the doctrine of separation of powers are: Complete separation is not possible, Complete separation is not desirable, Impracticable in itself, and Separation of powers can lead to deadlocks and inefficiency.
Please give me brainliest - you get 25% as well! I swear!
You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You sit down under the tree and see a brown wallet close by. Curiosity gets the best of you, and you open the waller. Interestingly enough, you find credit cards, identification, and $300 in cash. Nobody else is around. What would you do? Using the post tab above, answer the question (minimum of 100 words)
Answer:
If I were an off-duty police officer and found a wallet with money, credit cards and personal documentation from a third party, without a doubt I would proceed to return said wallet with all its contents to its rightful owner. Thus, I would use my position as a law enforcement officer to track down said person and, once located, I would return their belongings.
I would do this for two reasons: first, because I consider that it is ethically and morally correct, since I do not own any of the belongings of the person who lost the wallet; and on the other hand, as a police officer I know the law and I know that appropriating something that does not belong to me can become a violation of the law.
Police work involves the threat of violence such as gunfire, stabbing, or assault
against officers. Provide two examples of other dangers (aside from outright
violence) associated with police work that an officer might face
Answer:
Law enforcement officers face many hazards in the line of duty. Though injuries from assaults and vehicular accidents are the most obvious, stress, cardiovascular disease, depression, and sulcide are also serious job-related risks.