No Solutions

3x+9+4x+x

Answer:

h = V/lw

Step-by-step explanation:

We know the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism is V = lwh. We need to use this equation and solve for h by dividing lw on both sides.

V = lwh

V/lw = h

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

1. x-9=-17-simplifies to a single solution-one solution

2.x+4=4+x-same thing on each side-infinite solutions

3. 0.4x=0.4x+2-same variable coefficient plus a number-no solutions

4. 5x=5x-3-same as above-no solutions

5. 5x=2-variable on one side, constant on another-one solution

6. x-5=x-5-same thing on each side-infinite solutions

7.3x=3x-same thing as above-infinite solutions

8.8x-10=8x-same coefficient for each variable plus a constant-no solutions

Answer:

One solution:

x + 9 = -17

5x = 10

No solution:

0.4x = 0.4x +2

5x = 5x - 3

8x - 10 = 8x

Infinite solutions:

x + 4 = 4 + x

x - 5 = x - 5

3x = 3x

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 9 = -17

  - 9     -9

x = -26 (one solution)

x + 4 = 4 + x

  - 4   - 4

x = x (infinite solutions)

0.4x = 0.4x +2

-0.4x  -0.4x

0 = 2 (no solution)

5x = 5x - 3

-5x  -5x

0 = -3 (no solution)

5x = 10

/5   /5

x = 5 (one solution)

x - 5 = x - 5

 + 5       + 5

x = x (infinite solutions)

3x = 3x (infinite solutions)

8x - 10 = 8x

    + 10  + 10

8x = 8x + 10

-8x   -8x

0 = 10 (no solution)

Hope this helps!

Answer:

2a)  -2

b) 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Equation of a parabola in vertex form

f(x) = a(x - h)² + k

where (h, k) is the vertex and the axis of symmetry is x = h

2 a)

Using the equation of a parabola in vertex form, a parabola with vertex (2, -6):  

f(x) = a(x - 2)² - 6

If one of the x-axis intercepts is 6, then

                 f(6) = 0

⇒ a(6 - 2)² - 6 = 0

⇒         16a - 6 = 0

⇒              16a = 6

⇒                  a = 6/16 = 3/8

So f(x) = 3/8(x - 2)² - 6

To find the other intercept, set f(x) = 0 and solve for x:

                    f(x) = 0

⇒ 3/8(x - 2)² - 6 = 0

⇒      3/8(x - 2)² = 6

⇒           (x - 2)² = 16

⇒              x - 2 = ±4

⇒                   x = 6,  -2

Therefore, the other x-axis intercept is -2

b)

Using the equation of a parabola in vertex form, a parabola with vertex (2, -6):  

f(x) = a(x - 2)² - 6

If one of the x-axis intercepts is -4, then

                 f(-4) = 0

⇒ a(-4 - 2)² - 6 = 0

⇒         36a - 6 = 0

⇒              36a = 6

⇒                  a = 6/36 = 1/6

So f(x) = 1/6(x - 2)² - 6

To find the other intercept, set f(x) = 0 and solve for x:

                    f(x) = 0

⇒  1/6(x - 2)² - 6 = 0

⇒       1/6(x - 2)² = 6

⇒           (x - 2)² = 36

⇒              x - 2 = ±6

⇒                   x = 8,  -4

Therefore, the other x-axis intercept is 8

\(\huge\text{Hey there!}\)

\(\mathsf{|48 - 6| + |- 35 + 7|}\)

\(\mathsf{|48 - 6| = \boxed{\bf 42}}\)

\(\mathsf{= 42 +| -35 + 7|}\)

\(\mathsf{|-35 + 7| = \boxed{\bf -28}}\)

\(\mathsf{= 42 + |- 28|}\)

\(\mathsf{= 42 + 28}\)

\(\boxed{\mathsf{= \bf 70}}\)

\(\boxed{\boxed{\large\textsf{Answer: \huge \bf 70}}}\huge\checkmark\)

\(\large\textsf{Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!}\)

~\(\frak{Amphitrite1040:)}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Sequence is defined as arrangement f numbers in a specific or defined pattern. Sequence are categorized into

1) Arithmetic

2) Geometric

Arithmetic sequence are characterized by their common difference while Geometric sequence are characterized by their common ratio.

Given a sequance of numbers say;

T1, T2, T3...

The first term "a" of the sequence is T1

Common difference d = T2-T1 =T3-T2

Common ratio = T2/T1 = T3/T2

The formula for calculating nth term of an Arithmetic sequence is expressed as;

Tn = a+(n-1)d

a is the first term

n is the number of terms

d is the common difference

The nth term of a Geometric sequence is expressed as;

Tn = ar^{n-1}

r is the common ratio

Numbers are arranged in a sequence when they follow a predetermined or established pattern. Sequences can be divided into

1) Mathematics

2) Graphitic

Geometric sequences are characterized by their common ratio, whereas arithmetic sequences are distinguished by their common difference.

Suppose a sequence of numbers is given;

T1, T2, T3...

The sequence's initial term "a" is T1.

common distinction d = T2-T1 =T3-T2

T2/T1 Common Ratio T3/T2

The following is the formula for finding the nth term in an arithmetic sequence:

Tn = a+(n-1)d

The first term is a.

The number of terms is n.

d is the typical discrepancy

The nth term of a Geometric sequence is expressed as;

\(T_{n} =ar^{n-1}\)

r is the common ratio

To learn more about information Sequence :

brainly.com/question/28015562

Unfortunately, based on the information provided, I cannot determine the measure of y. It seems like the numbers 4, N, 16, y, and Х are given without any context or relation to each other. If you provide more information or context, I may be able to help you solve the problem.

Answer:

The value of x is 7 if the equation can be reduced to (x + 9)³ = 4096 after applying the properties of the integer exponent option (C) 7 is correct.

What is an integer exponent?

In mathematics, integer exponents are exponents that should be integers. It may be a positive or negative number. In this situation, the positive integer exponents determine the number of times the base number should be multiplied by itself.

It is given that:

The equation is:

After solving:

(x + 9)³ = 4096

x + 9 = ∛4096

x + 9 = 16

x = 7

Thus, the value of x is 7 if the equation can be reduced to (x + 9)³ = 4096 after applying the properties of the integer exponent option (C) 7 is correct.

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

It's the same on both sides

Answer:

The answer is 4y

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify the expression.

Hoped this helped!

Could I perhaps get brainly?

Answer:

4y

Step-by-step explanation:

9y-6y= 3y

3y+y=4y

There you go :)

Answer:

\( {(27m)}^{ \frac{2}{3} } \\ \\ = {(3 {}^{3}m) }^{ \frac{2}{3} } \\ \\ = ( {3}^{3} ) {}^{ \frac{2}{3} } \times {m}^{ \frac{2}{3} } \\ \\ = {3}^{ \frac{6}{3} } \times {m}^{ \frac{2}{3} } \\ \\ = {3}^{2} \times {m}^{ \frac{2}{3} } \\ \\ = 9 {m}^{ \frac{2}{3} } \\ \\ = 9 \sqrt[3]{ {m}^{2} } \)

The value of ∫c xdy − ydx along the curve y = x^2 from (0,0) to (2,4) is 8/3.

To evaluate the line integral, we first parameterize the curve y = x^2. Let's define a parameter t that ranges from 0 to 2. We can express the curve as x = t and y = t^2.

Next, we substitute these parameterizations into the integrand xdy - ydx. We obtain:

∫c xdy − ydx = ∫[0,2] t(2t) - (t^2)dt = ∫[0,2] 2t^2 - t^2 dt = ∫[0,2] t^2 dt.

Evaluating the integral gives us (1/3) t^3 evaluated from 0 to 2:

(1/3) (2^3 - 0^3) = (1/3) (8) = 8/3.

Therefore, the value of the line integral along the curve y = x^2 from (0,0) to (2,4) is 8/3.

to learn more about value click here:

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

(a) The 95% confidence interval for the population mean of the treatment group is [7.02, 10.98].

(b) To calculate Cohen's d, we need the standard deviation of the sample. Using the given sample scores, the standard deviation is approximately 2.68. Cohen's d is then (9 - 8.31) / 2.68 = 0.26, indicating a small effect size.

(c) To perform a hypothesis test, we compare the sample mean of 8.31 (obtained from the given sample scores) with the population mean of 9. Using a t-test, assuming a significance level of 0.05 and a two-tailed test, we calculate the t-value as (8.31 - 9) / (2.68 / sqrt(6)) = -0.57. The critical t-value for a 95% confidence level with degrees of freedom of 5 (n-1) is 2.571. Since |-0.57| < 2.571, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest a significant difference between the population mean of the treatment group and the mean of the general population.

(d) Bayesian factor (BF) represents the strength of evidence for one hypothesis over another. Without specific information about the alternative hypothesis, we cannot compute a Bayesian factor in this case.

(a) To compute a 95% confidence interval for the population mean of the treatment group, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = sample mean ± (t-value * standard error)

From the given sample scores, the sample mean is (10 + 7 + 9 + 6 + 10 + 12) / 6 = 8.31. The t-value for a 95% confidence level with degrees of freedom 5 (n-1) is 2.571. The standard error can be calculated as the sample standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.

Using the sample scores, the sample standard deviation is approximately 2.68. The standard error is then 2.68 / sqrt(6) ≈ 1.09.

Plugging in the values, the 95% confidence interval is 8.31 ± (2.571 * 1.09), which gives us [7.02, 10.98].

(b) Cohen's d is a measure of effect size, which indicates the standardized difference between the sample mean and the population mean. It is calculated by subtracting the population mean from the sample mean and dividing it by the standard deviation of the sample.

In this case, the population mean is given as 9. From the sample scores, we can calculate the sample mean and standard deviation. The sample mean is 8.31, and the standard deviation is approximately 2.68.

Using the formula, Cohen's d = (sample mean - population mean) / sample standard deviation, we get (8.31 - 9) / 2.68 ≈ 0.26. This suggests a small effect size.

(c) To perform a hypothesis test, we can compare the sample mean of the treatment group (8.31) with the mean of the general population (9) using a t-test. The null hypothesis assumes that the population mean of the treatment group is equal to the mean of the general population.

Using the sample scores, the standard deviation is approximately 2.68, and the sample size is 6. The t-value is calculated as (sample mean - population mean) / (sample standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)).

Plugging in the values, the t-value is (8.31 - 9) / (2.68 / sqrt(6)) ≈ -0.57. The critical t-value for a 95% confidence level with 5 degrees of freedom (n-1) is 2.571.

Since |-0.57| < 2.571, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means there is not enough evidence to suggest a significant difference between the population mean of the treatment group and the mean of the general population.

(d) Bayesian factor (BF) represents the strength of evidence for one hypothesis over another based on prior beliefs and data. However, to compute a Bayesian factor, we need specific information about the alternative hypothesis, which is not provided in the given question. Therefore, we cannot calculate a Bayesian factor in this case.

(a) The 95% confidence interval for the population mean of the treatment group is [7.02, 10.98].

(b) Cohen's d suggests a small effect size, with a value of approximately 0.26.

(c) The hypothesis test does not provide enough evidence to suggest a significant difference between the population mean of the treatment group and the mean of the general population.

(d) A Bayesian factor cannot be computed without information about the alternative hypothesis.

To know more about standard deviation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

Answer: (6, -6)

Step-by-step explanation:

so midpoint =(\(\frac{X1+X2}{2}\),\(\frac{Y1+Y2}{2}\))

for x co ordinate

\(\frac{-2+X2}{2}\)=2

-2+X=4            (X2=x co ordinate point for b, can be written as just x now)

X=6

x co ordinate of B= 6

y co ordinates of y

\(\frac{-8+Y2}{2}\)=-7

-8+Y=-14

Y=-6

co ordinates B (6,-6)

for proof/extra explanation (NOT necessary for working):

\(\frac{Y1+Y2}{2}\)

=\(\frac{(-2)+6, (-8)+(-6)}{2}\)

=\(\frac{4, -14}{2}\)

=(2,-7)

which is the midpoint M

A) The exact cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3771.70. B)  Using the marginal cost, the approximate cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3741.40.

(A) To find the exact cost of producing the 31st food processor, we substitute x = 31 into the cost function C(x) = 1900 + 60x - 0.3x^2:

C(31) = 1900 + 60(31) - 0.3(31)^2

C(31) = 1900 + 1860 - 0.3(961)

C(31) = 1900 + 1860 - 288.3

C(31) = 3771.7

Therefore, the exact cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3771.70.

(B) The marginal cost represents the rate of change of the cost function with respect to the quantity produced. Mathematically, it is the derivative of the cost function C(x).

Taking the derivative of C(x) = 1900 + 60x - 0.3x^2 with respect to x, we get:

C'(x) = 60 - 0.6x

To approximate the cost of producing the 31st food processor using the marginal cost, we evaluate C'(x) at x = 31:

C'(31) = 60 - 0.6(31)

C'(31) = 60 - 18.6

C'(31) ≈ 41.4

The marginal cost at x = 31 is approximately 41.4 dollars.

To approximate the cost, we add the marginal cost to the cost of producing the 30th food processor:

C(30) = 1900 + 60(30) - 0.3(30)^2

C(30) = 1900 + 1800 - 0.3(900)

C(30) = 3700

Approximate cost of producing the 31st food processor ≈ C(30) + C'(31)

≈ 3700 + 41.4

≈ 3741.4

Therefore, using the marginal cost, the approximate cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3741.40.

Learn more about marginal cost here:

brainly.com/question/14923834

#SPJ11

Answer:Park rangers released 4 fish into a pond in year 0. Each year, there were three times as many fish as the year before. How many fish were there after x years? Write a function to represent this scenario.

Step-by-step explanation:

An function which best represent the given scenario is,  4 x 3ˣ. So option B is correct.

What is geometric progression?

In algebra, in sequence we study various progressions, one of the progression is geometric, in this progression for every two consecutive terms, the common ratio is the same.

Formula for nth term of G.P.,

Tₙ = a×rⁿ

where a is first term and r is common ratio

Given that,

Park rangers released 4 fish into a pond in year 0.

Each year, there were three times as many fish as the year before.

The number of fish after x years = ?

After 1 year,

the number of fish  =  4 x 3

After 2 year,

the number of fish  = 4 x 3 x 3

                               = 4 x 3²

After 3 year,

the number of fish = 4 x 3² x3

                              = 4 x 3³

Similarly, after x years

the number of fish =  4 x 3ˣ

Hence, the expression is  4 x 3ˣ

Answer:

x = 46 via Angle Addition postulate (2x+4 = 60 + x-10 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

-3+2h=2h

-3=2h-2h

-3=0

Answer:

This equation has no solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

If each chip chosen from the shipment has a 0.05 probability of being defective, then the probability of a chip working properly is 1 - 0.05 = 0.95.

Since each chip is chosen independently, the probability that all 16 chips in a car will work properly is the product of the individual probabilities of each chip working properly.

Probability of a chip working properly = 0.95

Number of chips in a car = 16

Probability that all 16 chips will work properly = (0.95)^16 ≈ 0.544

Therefore, the probability that all 16 chips in a car will work properly is approximately 0.544, or 54.4%.

Learn more about probability Visit : brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

i) C = πd

C = π × 20yd

C = 20π yards

ii) A = πr²

A = 3.14 × 3²

A =28.26 m²

note that the radius here is 6/2 = 3m.

The perimeter of any figure is given by the sum of all its sides:

If we want to find the perimeter of the given triangle, we need to sum up all the sides.

Perimeter = 11 in + 5 in + 13 in

Perimeter= 29 in

Hence, the perimeter is 29in

we can check if w is in Col A by checking if there exists a solution to Ax=w. We can write the system as \(\begin{bmatrix}-6 & 12\\ -3 .

& 6\end{bmatrix}x=\begin{bmatrix}-8\\-2\\-9\\4\\0\\1\end{bmatrix}\)Using Gaussian Elimination, we can row reduce the augmented matrix:\(\left[\begin{array}{cc|c}-6 & 12 & -8\\-3 & 6 & -2\\-9 & 0 & -9\\4 & 0 & 4\\0 & 0 & 0\\1 & 0 & 1\end{array}\right] \to \left[\begin{array}{cc|c}-2 & 4 & 2\\0 & 0 & 0\\0 & 0 & 0\\0 & 0 & 0\\0 & 0 & 0\\0 & 0 & 0\end{array}\right]\)

This shows that the system is consistent, since there are only two non-zero rows in the row echelon form. Hence, w is in the column space of A.Now let's check if w is in the null space of A.

We know that a vector v is in the null space of a matrix A if and only if Av=0. We can write the equation as \(\begin{bmatrix}-6 & 12\\ -3 & 6\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}4\\1\\-2\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\end{bmatrix}\)Evaluating the product, we get: \

(\begin{bmatrix}(-6)(4) + (12)(1)\\(-3)(4) + (6)(1)\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\end{bmatrix}\)This shows that w is in the null space of A, since Av=0.

To know more about Determine visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29898039

#SPJ11

The congruency statement for the two triangles is:

∆FGH ≅ ∆JKL

To determine if triangles ∆FGH and ∆JKL are congruent, we need to compare the corresponding sides and angles of the two triangles.

Let's start by finding the lengths of the sides of each triangle:

∆FGH:

Side FG: Distance between F(-5, 10) and G(-2, 2)

= √[(-2 - (-5))^2 + (2 - 10)^2]

= √[3^2 + (-8)^2]

= √[9 + 64]

= √73

Side GH: Distance between G(-2, 2) and H(-9, -7)

= √[(-9 - (-2))^2 + (-7 - 2)^2]

= √[(-7)^2 + (-9)^2]

= √[49 + 81]

= √130

Side FH: Distance between F(-5, 10) and H(-9, -7)

= √[(-9 - (-5))^2 + (-7 - 10)^2]

= √[(-4)^2 + (-17)^2]

= √[16 + 289]

= √305

∆JKL:

Side JK: Distance between J(0, -5) and K(9, 2)

= √[(9 - 0)^2 + (2 - (-5))^2]

= √[9^2 + 7^2]

= √[81 + 49]

= √130

Side KL: Distance between K(9, 2) and L(-8, -2)

= √[(-8 - 9)^2 + (-2 - 2)^2]

= √[(-17)^2 + (-4)^2]

= √[289 + 16]

= √305

Side JL: Distance between J(0, -5) and L(-8, -2)

= √[(-8 - 0)^2 + (-2 - (-5))^2]

= √[(-8)^2 + 3^2]

= √[64 + 9]

= √73

By comparing the side lengths, we see that ∆FGH and ∆JKL have the same lengths for all three sides: FG ≈ JK ≈ √73, GH ≈ KL ≈ √130, and FH ≈ JL ≈ √305.

Since all corresponding sides have the same lengths, we can conclude that ∆FGH and ∆JKL are congruent.

To learn more about congruency visit;

https://brainly.com/question/31992651

#SPJ11

Based on the given information, it is not possible to determine whether it is a part of the long run or short run without additional data.

The table provided includes the price (P), marginal revenue (MR), quantity (Q), fixed costs (FC), and variable costs (VC). However, it does not specify the time period or provide information about the industry or market conditions.

In the short run, a perfect competitor would continue to produce as long as the price (P) exceeds the average variable cost (AVC). If P > AVC, the firm would produce the quantity (Q) that maximizes its profit or minimizes its losses.

To calculate the output and profit of a perfect competitor, additional information is needed, such as the average total cost (ATC) or the market demand curve. With this information, one can determine the profit-maximizing level of output, which occurs where marginal cost (MC) equals marginal revenue (MR).

Without further data, it is not possible to provide a complete analysis or graph the answers.

 To learn more about marginal cost click here:brainly.com/question/32126253

#SPJ11

Answer:

C) 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Absolute value means that the number will become positive.

For A, 15 will stay as 15.

For B, 5 will stay as 5.

For C, 1 will stay as 1.

For D, -25 will become 25.

So 1 is the smallest number out of the 4 options.

The probabilities are =

a) 0.0918 or 9.18%.

b) 0.2619 or 26.19%.

c) 0.0105 or 1.05%.

To solve these probability questions, we need to utilize the properties of the normal distribution. Let's address each question step by step:

If the true depth is 2 feet and the measurement error (E) is assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.5 feet, we want to find the probability that the depth measurement (M) will be negative.

To do this, we can calculate the z-score for a depth of 0 feet, given the mean of 2 feet and the standard deviation of 1.5 feet:

z = (0 - 2) / 1.5 = -2 / 1.5 = -4/3 ≈ -1.333

Next, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a statistical software to find the probability corresponding to this z-score.

Looking up the z-score of -1.333, we find that the corresponding probability is approximately 0.0918 or 9.18%.

Therefore, the probability that the depth measurement will be negative when the true depth is 2 feet is approximately 0.0918 or 9.18%.

2) Let's consider three independent depth measurements taken at a point where the true depth is 2 feet. We want to find the probability that at least one of these measurements will be negative.

Since each measurement is independent, the probability that a single measurement is negative is the same as in question 1, which is approximately 0.0918 or 9.18%.

To find the probability that at least one measurement is negative, we can calculate the complement of the event that all three measurements are positive. The probability that a single measurement is positive is 1 - 0.0918 = 0.9082 or 90.82%.

Since the measurements are independent, the probability that all three measurements are positive is (0.9082)³ = 0.7381 or 73.81%.

Therefore, the probability that at least one of the three measurements will be negative is 1 - 0.7381 = 0.2619 or 26.19%.

3) We want to find the probability that the mean of the three independent depth measurements taken at the point where the true depth is 2 feet will be negative.

The mean of the three measurements will still follow a normal distribution with a mean equal to the true depth, which is 2 feet, and a standard deviation equal to the standard deviation of a single measurement divided by the square root of the number of measurements.

Standard deviation of the mean = 1.5 feet / √3 ≈ 0.866 feet

Now we need to find the probability that the mean is negative, so we calculate the z-score for a depth of 0 feet using the mean of 2 feet and the standard deviation of 0.866 feet:

z = (0 - 2) / 0.866 ≈ -2.309

Looking up the z-score of -2.309 in a standard normal distribution table or using statistical software, we find that the corresponding probability is approximately 0.0105 or 1.05%.

Therefore, the probability that the mean of the three independent depth measurements will be negative when the true depth is 2 feet is approximately 0.0105 or 1.05%.

Learn more about probability click;

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ4

No shes not.

You need to add all the sides if finding perimeter

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation should only have one 5, the other 5 doesn't matter for perimeter