Criminal law cases are when the government charges an individual with violating a statute enacted to protect public health, safety, morals, or welfare fall under.
government . noun. the exercise of political authority over the movements, affairs, and so on, of a political unit, human beings, and so forth, in addition to the overall performance of sure capabilities for this unit or frame; the action of governing; political rule and administration. a central authority is the system to govern a state or community.
The Columbia Encyclopedia defines authorities as "a device of social control beneath which the right to make legal guidelines, and the proper to enforce them, is vested in a particular group in society". a government is an institution via which leaders exercising electricity to make and enforce legal guidelines. a central authority's simple capabilities are imparting management, retaining order, providing public offerings, providing country wide security, imparting financial security, and imparting monetary assistance.
Learn more about government here: https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ4
You should prepare to slow down ahead of:
(Select All That Apply)
A curve
A yellow traffic signal
Busy traffic
You should prepare to slow down ahead of:
A curveA yellow traffic signalBusy trafficWhat is slow downin traffic?A slowdown in traffic refers to a decrease in the speed of vehicles on a roadway, resulting in a reduction in the overall flow of traffic. This can be caused by various factors, such as congestion, road construction, accidents, adverse weather conditions, or an increase in the number of vehicles on the road.
A slowdown in traffic can cause delays and frustration for drivers and passengers, and it can also have a significant impact on the economy by impeding the movement of goods and services. To alleviate traffic slowdowns, transportation planners and engineers often implement strategies such as adding more lanes to highways, improving public transit options, optimizing traffic signal timing, and encouraging carpooling or other alternative modes of transportation.
Learn more about traffic at:
https://brainly.com/question/9380087
#SPJ1
A warrant is required when arresting a juvenile for a criminal act? True or False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Let’s say this.
A group of teenage boys walks into a retail store, and an officer is 25ft from their presence. They run out of the store carrying electronics. The worker from the store shouts for someone to help them. The officer runs after the juveniles and he/she has the right to make a warrantless arrest on behalf of theft of property, which can result in a fine or time in jail.
So your answer wouldv’e been false.
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
This type of law covers personal wrongs and damage and includes libel, slander, assault, trespass, and negligence. Group of answer choices civil law substantive law criminal law tort law
Tort law covers personal wrongs and damage and includes libel, slander, assault, trespass, and negligence.
Tort law encompasses various types of civil wrongs, including:
Libel and slander: These involve defamation, which refers to false statements that harm a person's reputation. Libel involves defamatory statements in written or printed form, while slander refers to spoken defamatory statements.Assault: Assault refers to the intentional act of causing apprehension or fear of immediate harmful or offensive contact. It involves the threat of physical harm or an attempt to injure someone.Trespass: Trespass occurs when a person unlawfully enters or interferes with another person's property without permission. It can involve physical intrusion or damage to someone's land, possessions, or personal space.Negligence: Negligence is the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person. It involves the breach of a duty of care owed by one party to another, causing foreseeable harm.Tort law provides a legal framework to address these personal wrongs and damage by allowing the injured party to file a civil lawsuit seeking compensation for their losses, such as medical expenses, property damage, or pain and suffering.
know more about Tort law here:
https://brainly.com/question/32273454
#SPJ11
Why is it that it takes 9 months for us to be born but a whole 12 months for our first birthday!?
Answer: Because it celebrates one full year of us being alive. *Birth*day
Explanation:
The mayor and city council have a secret meeting to pass a law requiring citizens to pay a special tax for new sewer lines. Which characteristic of rule of law was violated in this situation?
Accountability to the law
Transparency of institutions
Decisions based on the law
Consistent application
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Transparency of institutions
is a voting system in which state governments run elections and provide voters the option of choosing candidates from multiple parties; also known as being called the secret ballot.
A voting system in which state governments run elections and provide voters with the option of choosing candidates from multiple parties is known as a pluralistic electoral system. This system promotes diversity and competition among political parties, allowing citizens to select their preferred candidates based on their policies and ideologies.
The secret ballot, an integral part of this system, ensures that voters can cast their votes confidentially without fear of coercion or retribution. In a pluralistic electoral system, state governments are responsible for organizing and conducting elections, which includes managing voter registration, setting up polling stations, and overseeing the vote-counting process. This delegation of responsibilities ensures that the electoral process is fair, transparent, and efficiently managed.
The secret ballot, also referred to as the Australian ballot, is a key feature of this voting system. It protects the privacy of voters by requiring them to mark their choices on a private, unmarked ballot. This process safeguards the democratic principle of one person, one vote, and prevents undue influence or voter intimidation.
In summary, a pluralistic electoral system managed by state governments allows voters to choose from multiple parties and candidates, fostering healthy political competition and providing a broad range of policy options. The secret ballot further strengthens this system by ensuring voter confidentiality and promoting fair and unbiased elections.
To know more about the Voting System visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29791217
#SPJ11
_____ refers to officers being allowed to search your home without a warrant if they observe an illegal act occurring right outside your home.
Answer:
Plain view
Explanation:
I believe. it's plain view because they can see it from a public area (street or sidewalk). This would give them the right to search your house.
Match the law enforcement agencies to the crimes based on their jurisdiction .
Here are some examples of law enforcement agencies and the crimes they typically have jurisdiction over:
FBI - The Federal Bureau of Investigation is responsible for investigating federal crimes such as interstate drug trafficking, cybercrime, terrorism, and white-collar crime.DEA - The Drug Enforcement Administration has jurisdiction over drug-related offenses, including the illegal manufacture, distribution, and trafficking of controlled substances.ATF - The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives is responsible for investigating crimes involving firearms, explosives, and alcohol and tobacco-related offenses.U.S. Marshals Service - The U.S. Marshals Service is responsible for apprehending fugitives, providing security for federal courts, and transporting prisoners.State Police - State police agencies typically have jurisdiction over crimes that occur within their state's borders, including traffic violations, drug crimes, and violent crimes.County Sheriff's Office - County sheriff's offices are responsible for maintaining peace and order within their jurisdiction, enforcing state and local laws, and providing court security.Local Police Department - Local police departments have jurisdiction over crimes that occur within their city or town, including property crimes, drug offenses, and traffic violations.Law enforcement agencies have different jurisdictions and responsibilities based on their specialized areas. The FBI investigates federal crimes like cybercrime, terrorism, and drug trafficking. The DEA focuses on drug-related offenses, including the distribution and trafficking of controlled substances. The ATF handles crimes involving firearms, explosives, and alcohol and tobacco offenses.
The U.S. Marshals Service apprehends fugitives, provides court security, and transports prisoners. State police agencies have jurisdiction over crimes within their state, such as traffic violations, drug crimes, and violent offenses. County sheriff's offices maintain peace and enforce local laws within their jurisdiction. Local police departments handle crimes within their city or town, such as property crimes, drug offenses, and traffic violations.
Learn more about FBI: https://brainly.com/question/30053758
#SPJ11
Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to avoid an illegal activity. to secure her privacy rights. to challenge the Ninth Amendment. to have a state law declared unconstitutional.
Answer:
to have a law declared unconstitutional
Explanation:
Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to have a law declared unconstitutional.
What is the right Jane Roe fought for?Jane Roe fought for the right for an abortion which was covered under the right to privacy.
Howver,, because the Texas law prohibits abortion, the case between her and the state led to the Supreme court for final ruling.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Jane Roe case
brainly.com/question/10184794
Who should determine if, and to what extent, a society is unjust?
Answer:
if two people are part of a society and one of them has the right to work and earn for himself while the other one is prohibited to do so (i.e. they are unequal before the law), we can safely say that this is an unjust society.
Not the best at law, so i wouldn't completely depend on this^^
Explanation:
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
What does a collections agency do when a creditor sells a debt to them?
Answer:The debts will be sold at less than their face value, but the debt purchaser is entitled to collect the full balance. This is where their profit comes from.
Rawls might criticize Locke’s social contract on which of the following grounds?
Answer:
a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.
Explanation:
What does voting by secret ballot mean? a. only the candidate you vote for can watch your marked ballot. b. no one can watch you vote except the election officer. c. the voter should not tell anyone for whom he/she voted. d. no one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot.
The correct answer is d. No one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot. Voting by secret ballot guarantees the privacy and confidentiality of each voter's choices, ensuring a fair and unbiased electoral process.
Voting by secret ballot means that no one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot. It ensures the privacy and confidentiality of each voter's choices. Let's break down the options to better understand why each one is incorrect or incomplete: a. Only the candidate you vote for can watch your marked ballot: This is not correct because voting by secret ballot guarantees that no one, including the candidate, can watch your marked ballot. It ensures that your voting choice remains confidential. b. No one can watch you vote except the election officer: This option is also incorrect. Voting by secret ballot means that no one, including the election officer, can watch you vote. It is essential to maintain the privacy and independence of the voting process.
c. The voter should not tell anyone for whom he/she voted: While this option partially captures the idea of voting by secret ballot, it doesn't fully explain the concept. Voting by secret ballot goes beyond not telling anyone for whom you voted. It ensures that no one can observe or determine your voting choice, guaranteeing your privacy.d. No one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot: This is the correct answer. Voting by secret ballot means that no one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot. It protects the integrity of the voting process and ensures that your choices remain confidential.
To know more about confidentiality visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31139333
#SPJ11
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
Discuss futuristically (up to what you consider too extreme) the technological and
moral implications of concepts like the surveillance society, panopticism, the prison-
industrial complex, the arrest-to-prison pipeline, and the prediction/control of
precrime in the management of antisocial behavior
The concept of a surveillance society, where individuals are constantly monitored through various technological means, is becoming increasingly relevant in today's world. With the widespread use of surveillance cameras, social media monitoring, and data collection by both private and government entities, the potential for abuse of this information is a growing concern. While the use of surveillance can help in crime prevention, it can also lead to a violation of privacy and freedom.
Panopticism, a concept developed by philosopher Michel Foucault, refers to a system of surveillance and control where individuals are constantly under watch, whether they know it or not. This system can be used to maintain order and discipline in society, but it also raises ethical questions about the power dynamic between those who are watched and those who are watching.
The prison-industrial complex refers to the relationship between the government and private companies that profit from the incarceration of individuals. This concept has led to the growth of the prison industry, which is often criticized for prioritizing profits over rehabilitation and justice. The arrest-to-prison pipeline is a related concept that describes the process by which individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities, are funneled into the criminal justice system from a young age, often due to factors such as poverty and racial discrimination.
The concept of precrime, made popular by the movie Minority Report, refers to the use of technology to predict and prevent crime before it occurs. While this may seem like a futuristic concept, predictive policing, and risk assessments are already being used in some jurisdictions. However, the use of these technologies raises concerns about bias and discrimination, as well as the potential for innocent individuals to be punished based on their predicted likelihood of committing a crime.
Overall, the technological and moral implications of these concepts are complex and multifaceted. While technological advancements may provide benefits in terms of crime prevention, they also raise serious ethical concerns about privacy, power, and discrimination. It is important to continue to critically examine these concepts and their implementation in society to ensure that they align with our values of justice and equality.
Which method of judicial selection might require confirmation by the state legislature or an executive counsel?
Answer:
Gubernatorial appointment.
Explanation:
With the method of gubernatorial appointment, a state governor will appoint a judge to a particular court, and confirmation by either an executive counsel or state legislation will follow.
which law introduced a corporate offense for the failure to prevent bribery
The law that introduced a corporate offense for the failure to prevent bribery is the UK Bribery Act of 2010.
This law was implemented to combat bribery and corruption in business transactions and established four key offenses, one of which is the corporate offense of failure to prevent bribery.
This offense holds companies responsible for any bribery committed by their employees or agents unless the company can prove that it had adequate measures in place to prevent such behavior.
The penalty for this offense can result in an unlimited fine, making it a significant legal risk for companies that operate in the UK. Overall, the UK Bribery Act of 2010 serves as a vital tool for promoting ethical business practices and accountability in the corporate world.
Know more about the UK Bribery Act of 2010 here:
https://brainly.com/question/31255215
#SPJ11
Which examples demonstrate common qualifications for Correction Services careers? Check all that apply.Lenny carefully records information on a computer.Emanuel is an excellent driver and has never had an accident or ticket.Winnie went to college for many years and earned a master’s degree.Vanessa is trained in the use of guns and other weapons.Roman is skilled at resolving conflicts when people disagree with each other.Sachiko is good at teaching people how to do things.
Answer:
Lenny carefully records information on a computer. Vanessa is trained in the use of guns and other weapons.
Roman is skilled at resolving conflicts when people disagree with each other.
Explanation:
The examples that demonstrate common qualifications for Correction Services careers are:
Lenny carefully records information on a computer.
Vanessa is trained in the use of guns and other weapons.
Roman is skilled at resolving conflicts when people disagree with each other.
What is Correction Services careers?The correction services careers includes the occupations which are related to oversee the individuals who has been arrested and who are awaiting for the trial, or the persons who have been convicted for some crime.
The correction services careers also oversee to the persons who are in jail as a prisoners. It includes the treatment, education and reintegration of offenders.
For example-Lenny carefully records information on a computer; Vanessa is trained in the use of guns and other weapons; Roman is skilled at resolving conflicts when people disagree with each other are the examples that demonstrate common qualifications for Correction Services careers.
Learn more about Correction Services careers here:
https://brainly.com/question/12711172
#SPJ6
Public domain represents works whose intellectual property rights have extended or works that have been released by the creator. True or false?.
A public area represents works whose intellectual property rights have been extended or works that have been released by means of the author's false.
The definition of an intellectual is a person greater inquisitive about logic as opposed to emotions. An example of an intellectual is a scientist.
When matters are perceived intellectually, then they are looked at from the aware mind and ordinary awareness, because of this a quantifiable, logical, outside angle concerning a number of mental "doing" = questioning, comparing, concluding, reasoning and planning.
Intellectual skills seek advice from the ways of questioning and problem-fixing utilized by experts in a discipline. A fashionable highbrow skill is vital to all fields of taking a look at is essential wondering. highbrow capacity consists of memory, verbal comprehension, reasoning, analysis, hassle-fixing, and reasoning abilities.
Learn more about Intellectual here:
https://brainly.com/question/1078532
#SPJ4
how did the constitution change the nature of the early united states
The Constitution changed the nature of the early United States by establishing a stronger central government, separating powers among different branches, creating a bicameral legislature, providing a clear ratification process, protecting individual liberties through the Bill of Rights, and allowing for flexibility in future changes.
The Constitution changed the nature of the early United States in several significant ways:
1. Establishment of a stronger central government: Before the Constitution, the United States was governed by the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government with limited powers. The Constitution established a stronger central government with the power to levy taxes, regulate commerce, and maintain a standing army, thus providing more stability and order.
2. Separation of powers: The Constitution divided the government into three branches - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This separation of powers ensured that no single branch would hold too much power, creating a system of checks and balances that prevents tyranny and protects individual rights.
3. Creation of a bicameral legislature: The Constitution established a two-house legislature, known as Congress, which is composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives. This system was designed to balance the interests of large and small states, with each state having equal representation in the Senate and representation based on population in the House.
4. Ratification process: The Constitution provided a clear process for ratification, which required nine out of the thirteen states to approve the document. This ensured that the Constitution would only become the supreme law of the land if a majority of the states agreed to its terms.
5. The Bill of Rights: To address concerns about individual liberties, the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were added to the Constitution. These amendments guarantee fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to bear arms, to all American citizens.
6. Flexibility for future changes: The Constitution included an amendment process, allowing for future changes to adapt to societal needs and issues. This flexibility has allowed the Constitution to remain relevant and functional over time, addressing issues that the Founding Fathers could not have anticipated.
To know more about Constitution of United States refer here: https://brainly.com/question/2416781#
#SPJ11
whats the reason of traffica laws
Answer:
The reason of traffic laws is to protect you and other people in the streets and to have a proper line of vehicles in the road to avoid accidents.
QUESTION 2 Read the following scenarios and identify whether the contract described in each is valid, void or voidable. In each instance, also indicate which factor (potentially) influences consensus: 2.1 John buys two tickets to a movie from Andile. John is under the impression that he is buying the tickets from a woman named "Ayanda". (2) 2.2 Tshidi kidnaps Rabelani's daughter and uses this as leverage to force Rabelani to sell his house to Tshidi at a ridiculously low price. (2) 2.3 Maggie tries to convince Lelo to buy her three-year-old fridge. Maggie lies to Lelo and tells her that the fridge was bought last month and that it was only used for two days. Based on this false information, Lelo buys the fridge from Maggie. (2) [6] 1
............................
The contracts in scenarios 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 are voidable, void, and voidable respectively.
In scenario 2.1, the contract between John and Andile is voidable. The factor that influences consensus is the false impression that John had about the seller. In scenario 2.2, the contract between Tshidi and Rabelani is void because it was entered into under duress. Kidnapping is illegal and therefore renders the contract invalid. In scenario 2.3, the contract between Maggie and Lelo is voidable. The false information provided by Maggie influenced Lelo's decision to buy the fridge.
Learn more about Contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/34698330
#SPJ2
URGENT PLS HELP
As you’re driving with your family on your annual road trip, you see a car stopped on the shoulder of the interstate. There are two police cars behind that car, with their lights flashing. About ten miles down the road, you then see another police car sitting alone in the median between both major lanes of the interstate. You notice that your dad, who is driving, begins to slow down quite substantially. What is MOST LIKELY the reason your dad began to slow down the car?
A.
He is following the law that states drivers must slow down when an officer is behind them.
B.
He is trying to see whether the police car belongs to a local police officer or a state trooper.
C.
He is being careful after being deterred when he previously saw the other car being pulled over earlier.
D.
He is avoiding having the police offer issue a warrant for his arrest.
Tineco a10-d lightweight cordless stick vacuum cleaner.
The Tineco A10-D lightweight cordless stick vacuum cleaner is one of the best cordless vacuum cleaners in the market today. It is designed to provide users with a powerful and convenient cleaning experience. The vacuum cleaner is light and easy to use and maneuver, making it perfect for cleaning around the house and in hard-to-reach areas.
One of the standout features of the Tineco A10-D is its powerful suction, which is capable of picking up dirt and debris from carpets, hardwood floors, and other surfaces. The vacuum cleaner is also equipped with a HEPA filter, which helps to trap allergens and other particles, making it ideal for people with allergies or asthma.
The Tineco A10-D is also equipped with a number of useful accessories, including a crevice tool, dusting brush, and upholstery tool, which can be used to clean various surfaces and areas around the home. Additionally, the vacuum cleaner is equipped with a detachable battery, which provides up to 25 minutes of run time per charge.
To know more about Tineco A10-D visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27831832
#SPJ11
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
What is a free lawyer
Answer:
basically a lawyer who can help you in your case for free and it is under the U.S. constitution that you must have a lawyer and these lawyers will fill in
Which of the following is the correct pairing of procedures or rules of each house of the legislative branch?
-Has a Rules Committee that decides how long debate will be on most bills.
senate
- Has use of the filibuster and cloture, which can help the minority to defeat a bill.
The correct pairing of procedures or rules of each house of the legislative branch are: House of Representatives -
Has a Rules Committee that decides how long debate will be on most bills; Senate - Has use of the filibuster and cloture, which can help the minority to defeat a bill. The legislative branch is one of the three branches of the federal government.
The legislative branch is made up of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Constitution grants Congress a great deal of authority, including the ability to declare war, levy taxes, regulate commerce, and establish a national currency.
In the House of Representatives, the Rules Committee decides how long debate will be on most bills. In the Senate, the filibuster and cloture can help the minority to defeat a bill.
The filibuster is a tactic used by minority senators to obstruct or block a vote on a bill by speaking for an extended period of time. Cloture is a procedure for ending debate and bringing a bill to a vote, requiring a three-fifths majority vote (60 senators).
This procedure was first adopted by the Senate in 1917, with the aim of ending filibusters during World War I. Since then, it has been used to end filibusters on numerous occasions, including the civil rights movement of the 1960s.
To know more about legislative branch refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/11883152#
#SPJ11
Sands is arrested for a warrant for murder. When he is brought to the station a detective reads him his Miranda Rights. The detective begins asking Sands questions. Sands is answering the questions but then asks, “Do I need an attorney?” The detective tells him, “That is your decision.” The detective then begins asking more questions. Sands then confesses to the murder.
Question: Did the detective violate Sands rights?
Answer:
No, he said that's his decision.
Explanation:
No.
He had his Miranda Rights read, meaning he knew he had the right to REMAIN silent, and asking for an attorney in that situation is pretty useless.