Answers
According to the stage model, diffusion of responsibility is most likely to affect witnesses' sense of obligation to intervene in an emergency situation.
An emergency situation can be referred to or considered as a form of situation wherein the happening or non-happening of an event is completely contingent. This contingency is experienced out of a complete uncertainty and extraordinary factors that effect in between. Moreover, an emergency situation may also influence the sense of obligation to intervene for the concerned person.
Learn more about an emergency situation here:
https://brainly.com/question/14805813
#SPJ4
Related Questions
how evidence is tendered in court
Answers
Tendering evidence is when you ask the court to consider a document, photograph or other object as part of the evidence in your case. To tender an item, you must: have the prior agreement of the prosecution before you ask the court to receive it in evidence,
how would the ADDRESSING framework help work with client?
Answers
Answer:
ADDRESSING framework enables to better recognize and understand cultural influences as a multidimensional combination of Age, Developmental and acquired Disabilities, Religion, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic status, Sexual orientation, Indigenous heritage, Native origin, and Gender
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
What kinds of activities, currently legal, should be labeled criminal in contemporary society? Why?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
i don't know maybe paparazzi's because its considered stalking and photographing people without their consent.
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
Answers
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
What form of restitution is used to repay society as a whole?
Answers
what is RA 6675 The Generic Act of 1988
Answers
What are some collages that yah recommend that majored in law ?
Answers
Answer:
Law school is expensive, but if you have scholarship, it won't be a problem. Here is some good law schools. (Beware, they may be expensive.)
Stanford University.Harvard.Duke University.All have some sort of law included.
I hope this helped at all.what is 453745+847568364
Answers
Answer: 848,022,109
hope this helps
plz mark brainlesit
Answer:
848,022,118
Explanation:
hope this helps
One source of funds from which life insurance policy dividends are paid is investment experience. this is when (choose from the following options) 1. invested premiums earn nothing. 2. invested premiums earn a higher return than was assumed. 3. fewer insureds die than were actuarially projected, therefore, fewer death claims were paid. 4. the cost of operating the company is less than assumed.
Answers
One source of funds from which life insurance policy dividends are paid is investment experience, specifically when invested premiums earn a higher return than was assumed.
When policyholders pay premiums for their life insurance policies, a portion of these funds are invested by the insurance company. These investments generate returns, which contribute to the overall financial performance of the company. If the invested premiums earn a higher return than what was originally projected or assumed by the company's actuaries, it creates a surplus of funds.
This surplus, resulting from favorable investment experience, allows the insurance company to distribute dividends to policyholders. These dividends can be paid out in the form of cash payments, reduction in premiums, or an increase in the policy's cash value. Essentially, the excess investment earnings serve as a source of funds to provide additional benefits to policyholders.
It is important to note that investment experience is just one of the factors contributing to the payment of life insurance policy dividends. Other factors, such as mortality experience (number of deaths compared to projections) and expense management, also play a role in determining the amount of dividends.
Learn more about insurance policy
brainly.com/question/7465532
#SPJ11
A city government wants to track down people who run small business and do not pay the city’s $125 business licenses fee. The city hired a private detective to obtain IRS tax records of city residents and determine who has reported small business income to the IRS but not paid for a license.
a) What arguments might the city government give in support for this action? What argument might privacy advocates give against it?
Answers
One of the arguments that the city government could give in support of the action or levy and collecting taxes is that small business owner are beneficiaries of public infrastructure that are installed and maintained using public funds. Hence, it is only just and equitable for them to contribute to the repair and maintenance of such facilities.
The argument that privacy advocates may give against such taxes is that they already pay Company Income Tax to the IRS. Hence this is a duplication of tax.
What is the IRS?The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the revenue service for the federal government of the United States, responsible for collecting federal taxes and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, the major body of federal statutory tax legislation.
The Internal Revenue Service is the nation's tax-collecting agency, and it is responsible for enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, which was adopted by Congress.
Learn more about taxes:
https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
What are some reasons that the U.S. would use jails and prisons as a response to crime?
-Sociology
Answers
Answer:
i think some of the reasons to why the united states puts criminals in jail is mainly so that cops and prison guards can keep watch of the criminals, so they do not harm any more people.
source(s)
https://www.sentencingproject.org/criminal-justice-facts/
The two 13-year-old girls are accused of stabbing a classmate with the intent of murdering her. According to the prosecutor, the girls planned the deed as a tribute to the fictional Slender Man, a paranormal creature who has supposedly been in existence for centuries. The girls found Slender Man on a Web site and decided to kill their friend to show devotion to the figure. Despite multiple stab wounds, the victim managed to crawl out of the woods where she had been abandoned. She was taken to a hospital and survived.
Was this crime an intentional murder (a homicide)? Should the two girls be charged as adults?
Answers
Answer:
yes it was a homicide and yes the two girls should be charged as adults.
Explanation:
I understand they listened to "Slenderman" but while the girls are getting charged they should seek to help their mental health . Because something could actually be wrong inside their heads. Even if it was someone telling them to do it , they still injured the female.Based on the given information, these activities is considered intentional murder, and the two girls will be charged as adults.
What is intentional murder?Intentional murder refers to an act of killing attempted by an individual in order to harm another person knowingly. unintentional murder is referred as harming another person mistakenly in self-defense.
In the given case, it is explained that The two 13-year-old girls are charged with purposefully attacking a classmate in order to kill her. The girls planned to murder their friend with respect to Slender Man after discovering him on a website.
The woman walked out of the woods where she had been placed despite having many stab wounds. Based on the woman's conditions and her statement the two girls are charged with homicide as they did the action in whole senses.
Learn more about intentional murder, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28460422
#SPJ2
What is the final step for a bill to become a law? A. Being approved by a congressional committe B. Be
Answers
Step 1: The bill is drafted
Any member of Congress – either from the Senate or the House or Representatives – who has an idea for a law can draft a bill. These ideas come from the Congress members themselves or from everyday citizens and advocacy groups. The primary Congress member supporting the bill is called the "sponsor". The other members who support the bill are called "co-sponsors".
Step 2: The bill is introduced
Once the bill is drafted, it must be introduced. If a Representative is the sponsor, the bill is introduced in the House. If a Senator is the sponsor, the bill is introduced in the Senate. Once a bill is introduced, it can be found on Congress.gov, which is the official government website that tracks federal legislation.
Step 3: The bill goes to committee
As soon as a bill is introduced, it is referred to a committee. Both the House and Senate have various committees composed of groups of Congress members who are particularly interested in different topics such as health or international affairs. When a bill is in the hands of the committee, it is carefully examined and its chances of passage by the entire Congress are determined. The committee may even choose to hold hearings to better understand the implications of the bill. Hearings allow the views of the executive branch, experts, other public officials and supporters, and opponents of the legislation to be put on the record. If the committee does not act on a bill, the bill is considered to be "dead".
Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill
Subcommittees are organized under committees and have further specialization on a certain topic. Often, committees refer bills to a subcommittee for study and their own hearings. The subcommittee may make changes to the bill and must vote to refer a bill back to the full committee.
Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill
When the hearings and subcommittee review are completed, the committee will meet to "mark up" the bill. They make changes and amendments prior to recommending the bill to the "floor". If a committee votes not to report legislation to the full chamber of Congress, the bill dies. If the committee votes in favor of the bill, it is reported to the floor. This procedure is called "ordering a bill reported".
Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill
Once the bill reaches the floor, there is additional debate and members of the full chamber vote to approve any amendments. The bill is then passed or defeated by the members voting.
Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber
When the House or Senate passes a bill, it is referred to the other chamber, where it usually follows the same route through committees and finally to the floor. This chamber may approve the bill as received, reject it, ignore it or change it. Congress may form a conference committee to resolve or reconcile the differences between the House and Senate versions of a bill. If the conference committee is unable to reach an agreement, the bill dies. If an agreement is reached, the committee members prepare a conference report with recommendations for the final bill. Both the House and Senate must vote to approve the conference report.
Step 8: The bill goes to the president
After both the House and Senate have approved a bill in identical form, the bill is sent to the President. If the President approves of the legislation, it is signed and becomes law. If the President takes no action for ten days while Congress is in session, the bill automatically becomes law. If the President opposes the bill, they may veto the bill. In addition, if no action is taken for 10 days and Congress has already adjourned, there is a "pocket veto" .
Step 9: Overriding a veto
If the President vetoes a bill, Congress may attempt to override the veto. If both the Senate and the House pass the bill by a two-thirds majority, the President's veto is overruled, and the bill becomes a law.
The final step for a bill to become a law is Being approved by the president. Thus the correct option is B.
What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
A bill is referred to as any kind of prosal related to new laws or modifications in the existing ones. In order to pass a bill it crosses through several stages which include majority support, debate as well as approval from the president.
The legislative branch can adopt legislation, but the executive branch and the president have the authority to veto them. The bill will be rejected if the president does not approve it.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about Bill, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26772399
#SPJ5
The complete question is probably
What is the final step for a bill to become a law? A. Being approved by a congressional committe B. Being approved by the president.
what is the pyramid structure for Shandong case study?
Answers
The Situation Analysis, which evaluates Shandong's environmental issues, economic development, and social variables, forms the base of the pyramid.
The second level highlights Shandong's unique problems, like air pollution, water contamination, and ecological destruction. This level is represented by the Complications. The questions highlighted make up the third level and concentrate on how Shandong can handle these difficulties while maintaining economic growth and enhancing the quality of life for its citizens. Complications arise from the unique problems faced by Shandong, such as air pollution, water contamination, and ecological destruction. Addressing these complications requires a careful balance between economic growth and the well-being of citizens. Here are some questions that can be explored to understand how Shandong can handle these difficulties:
learn more about Situation Analysis here :
https://brainly.com/question/28180478
#SPJ11
What kind of contract is a dvd of the month club?
Answers
Answer:
i think so Generic Contract
Explanation:
Generic Contract think so
a political science professor is researching the effects that the fifteenth and twenty-sixth amendments have had on the american political system. which of the following is the most likely reason the professor is researching these amendments?
Answers
The most likely reason the political science professor is researching the fifteenth and twenty-sixth amendments is to gain a deeper understanding of the ways in which these amendments have impacted voting rights and participation in the American political system. The fifteenth amendment, ratified in 1870, prohibited the denial of voting rights on the basis of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
The twenty-sixth amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age from 21 to 18. By examining the effects of these amendments, the professor may be seeking to better understand the evolution of the American political system and the ongoing struggle for equal representation and participation in government.
Hi! The most likely reason the political science professor is researching the 15th and 26th Amendments is to analyze their impact on voting rights and political participation in the American political system. These amendments expanded the electorate by prohibiting voter discrimination based on race (15th Amendment) and lowering the voting age to 18 (26th Amendment). By studying these amendments, the professor aims to understand how these changes have influenced political outcomes, representation, and civic engagement in the United States.
To know more about political science visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14290967
#SPJ11
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law:____.a. is only a state misdemeanor b. is always a federal crime c. results in prison penalties up to 20 years d. results in a maximum fine of $300,000
Answers
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law - results in a maximum fine of $300,000
The unauthorized seizure of another person's property with the purpose to permanently rob them of it is considered theft in law. This might include real assets like cash or personal property as well as intangible assets like trade secrets or private data. Depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the incident, theft is a serious felony that may be punished with fines or imprisonment.
The maximum sentence for identity theft in federal court is 15 years in federal prison, but identity theft cases sometimes also involve other counts that might lengthen the prison term.
For such more question on theft:
brainly.com/question/30293258
#SPJ4
Operating under the “color of law” refers to _____.
the requirement that jails treat incarcerated individuals equally the person bringing
a legal action against a defendant
the legal authority that some persons have over citizens
the use of police force against a person of color
Answers
Answer:
The legal authority that some persons have over citizens.
Explanation:
To act "under color of state law" means to act beyond the bounds of lawful authority, but in such a manner that the unlawful acts were done while the official was purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his official duties.
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.
Answers
Thinking about a felony (serious
crime, more than a year in prison) versus a misdemeanor crime (less serious crime,
less than a year in jail), how should the following scenario be classified and why.
Steve and Dan were riding and listening to LOUD music on the radio. Steve was the
driver and Dan was the passenger. Both men had at least one drink for dinner
FOUR hours earlier, Dan had three. An unidentified man ran the light causing Steve
to slam into his car totaling it. The unidentified man had severe bodily injuries and
was taken to the hospital. The police officer arrived to investigate the accident
and smelled alcohol on Dans breath and arrested BOTH men (Steve and Dan) and
charged them with a felony DUI (driving under the influence).
In YOUR opinion, was it fair to arrest BOTH men for DUI? Why or why not?
Should Steve be charged? Why or why not? Should the other driver be charged?
Why or why not? Could or should either be charged with a misdemeanor? Why or
why not?
Answers
Answer:
Based on the scenario provided, it is fair to arrest Steve only for DUI. The police officer smelled alcohol on Steve's breath, indicating that he was driving under the influence of alcohol. Steve was driving the car and was responsible for the safety of the passengers and other drivers on the road. Therefore, he should be charged with DUI.
The other driver who ran the red light cannot be charged with DUI as there is no evidence to suggest that he was driving under the influence of alcohol or any other substance. However, he could potentially face charges for causing the accident.
Whether the charge should be a felony or misdemeanor depends on the specific laws in the state where the accident occurred and the severity of the injuries sustained by the other driver. However, a felony charge is appropriate since the other driver sustained severe bodily injuries .
Overall, individuals must understand the potential consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. They should make responsible decisions to ensure their safety and the safety of others on the road.
Explanation:
Two well known athletes who are considered the best in the world are about to
compete. Athlete A knows that Athlete B used an illegal substance regularly for two
years and stopped a month ago. Athete A goes to the police and reports the previous
illegal activity to get Athlete B jailed to miss the competition and secure a win for Athlete
A without even competing. What are the criminal law implications here and will Athlete A
be successful with the plan? Your answer should list any pertinent rules and then apply
them to the situation
Answers
Athlete A's actions would likely constitute the crime of extortion or blackmail. It is also possible that Athlete A's actions could be considered obstruction of justice. Athlete A's plan would not be successful, as it would be illegal and unethical.
Why is Extortion a threat?Extortion or blackmail involves using threats or coercion to obtain something of value from another person. In this case, Athlete A is using the threat of reporting Athlete B's past illegal activity to the police to try to gain an advantage in the competition. This would likely be considered extortion or blackmail.
Additionally, Athlete A's actions could be considered obstruction of justice, as they are attempting to interfere with the legal process by using information as leverage.
Overall, Athlete A's plan is both illegal and unethical. It goes against fair play and sportsmanship and could result in serious legal consequences.
To know more about blackmail visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30371085
#SPJ1
It is important to uphold the principles of fair play and sportsmanship, and to avoid engaging in any behaviour that could harm the reputation or freedom of movement of others.
What are the criminal law implications?The scenario you have described raises some important ethical and legal questions, and there are a number of criminal law implications to consider.
From a criminal law perspective, Athlete A's actions could potentially be considered defamation, which is the act of making false statements that harm a person's reputation.
Defamation can be both a civil and criminal offence, and depending on the jurisdiction, it can be punishable by fines, imprisonment, or both.
if Athlete A's false report to the police results in Athlete B being falsely arrested or imprisoned,
Athlete A could be charged with false imprisonment, which is the act of intentionally restricting someone's freedom of movement without lawful justification. False imprisonment can also result in criminal charges and significant penalties.
In terms of the rules and regulations of the relevant sporting organization, Athlete A's actions could violate the organization's code of conduct or anti-doping policies.
Many sports organizations have strict rules prohibiting the use of performance-enhancing drugs and other substances, and athletes who violate these rules can face significant penalties, including suspension or disqualification from competition.
However, if Athlete A's false report to the police is discovered, they could also face disciplinary action from the sporting organization, including suspension or disqualification from competition.
Athlete A's plan to falsely accuse Athlete B of using illegal substances and get them jailed to miss the competition is both unethical and illegal.
Therefore, It is important to uphold the principles of fair play and sportsmanship, and to avoid engaging in any behaviour that could harm the reputation or freedom of movement of others.
Learn more about law here:
https://brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ1
A disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is...
a) group politics
b) void of expert opinion
c) an increase in programmed costs
d) faster decision making
e) too much brainstorming
Answers
The disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is a) group politics.
When a decision-making process involves interacting groups, group politics is likely to come into play. Group politics refers to the dynamics, power struggles, and personal interests that can influence decision-making within a group. Individuals may engage in behaviors such as lobbying, forming alliances, or pursuing personal agendas, which can hinder the overall effectiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process. This can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions that may not necessarily align with the organisation's best interests or the problem being addressed.
Learn more about group politics: https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ11
The husband says: “I know what I’m doing. Its not my first time.” Why is his arugment a generalization?
Answers
Answer:
because he doesnt specify what he's doing or how many times he's done it
Explanation:
prenatal care often includes which of the following components? multiple select question. comprehensive educational services employment services nutritional services social services
Answers
Prenatal care includes a)comprehensive educational services, b) employement services,d)social services.So,correct options are a,b,d.
Prenatal care, otherwise called antenatal consideration, is a sort of preventive medical services. It is given as clinical exams, comprising of suggestions on dealing with a sound way of life and the arrangement of clinical data like maternal physiological changes in pregnancy, natural changes, and pre-birth nourishment including pre-birth nutrients, which forestalls potential medical conditions over the span of the pregnancy and advances the mother and youngster's wellbeing alike.[1][2]The accessibility of routine pre-birth care, including pre-birth screening and conclusion, has had an impact in decreasing the recurrence of maternal demise, unsuccessful labors, birth surrenders, low birth weight, neonatal contaminations and other preventable medical issues.
Prenatal care has four components :
(1) the underlying admission history and actual assessment,
(2) intermittent screening or symptomatic testing,
(3) sequential assessments watching patterns of different objective estimations and patient's close to home change in accordance with pregnancy, and
(4) patient schooling.
Hence,options a,b and d are correct.
To know more about prenatal care,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/30092987
#SPJ4
(Complete question) is:
prenatal care often includes which of the following components? multiple select question.
a)comprehensive educational services
b)employment services
c)nutritional services
d)social services
35. David Fahey, a businessman in a medium-sized Ohio town, decides to run for city council. He has a
master's degree, is married, has three sons, and is a respected member of society. He fears he may lose the
upcoming city council election to a newcomer, Keith Joseph, who recently moved back to town after
establishing himself in South Carolina.
David hires his best friend, John, to call in a bomb threat on election day to a precinct where his rival, Keith
Joseph, is expected to garner majority support. This act is an example of
a. election fraud
a
Answers
The action of falsely calling a bomb threat on the election day to prevent the people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud.
Election fraud entails the following actions that includes:
election manipulationvoter fraud or riggingillegal interference with election process for personal purpose.The intention of David to call a false bomb threat on the election day to prevent people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud because it aims to reduced the vote garner by the opposition candidate.
Therefore, the Option A is correct because the act is an example of election fraud.
Read more about Election fraud:
brainly.com/question/24981124
Which of the following is a sentence that a judge can impose on a defendant at
sentencing (only one correct answer)?
a) Declaratory
b) Expository
c) Probation
d) Thematic
e) Runaway
Answers
Answer: C - probation.
Explanation:
Question 1
__ is important to law enforcement, because police officers have the right to deprive people of their liberty.
A unethical behavior
B Ethical behavior
Misuse of force
D) Use of force
Answers
what is the fowlling passage?
Answers
Answer:
where is the question?????
Government - T1 - 2106315 CR
English
E!
Place each example in the correct category. Which activities demonstrate expressed powers, and which demonstrate
implied powers?
raising taxes
Expressed powers
Implied powers
regulating trade
coining money
dating soldiers
declaring was
creating a national bank
Intro
Done
Answers
consertaives are opposed to the exercise of judical power because of concerns that unelected judges will
Answers
Conservatives are not necessarily opposed to exercise of judicial power, but they often advocate for more limited role of judiciary in interpreting and enforcing laws.
What is judiciary?The judiciary is the branch of government responsible for interpreting and enforcing the laws of a country. It is composed of judges and courts at various levels, from local to national. The judiciary plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law, protecting individual rights, and resolving disputes. Judges are appointed or elected to their positions and are expected to be impartial and independent from other branches of government. They are responsible for interpreting the constitution and statutes, applying them to specific cases, and making decisions based on the facts presented in court. The judiciary also has the power to review the actions of other branches of government to ensure they are consistent with the law.
To learn more about judiciary, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4