A particle is moving along the x-axis on the interval 0 ≤ t ≤ 10, and its position is given by x of t equals one third times x cubed minus five halves times x squared plus 6 times x minus 10. at what time(s), t, is the particle at rest?

answers:
t = 0
t = 2 and 3
t = 1 and 5
t = 6

The minimal point does not have x = 0.

(a) Kuhn-Tucker conditions for the minimal value of fThe Kuhn-Tucker conditions are a set of necessary conditions for a point x* to be a minimum of a constrained optimization problem subject to inequality constraints. These conditions provide a way to find the optimal values of x1, x2, ..., xn that maximize or minimize a function f subject to a set of constraints. Let's first write down the Lagrangian: L(x, y, λ1, λ2, λ3) = f(x, y) - λ1(x+y-1) - λ2(xy-3) - λ3x - λ4y Where λ1, λ2, λ3, and λ4 are the Kuhn-Tucker multipliers associated with the constraints. Taking partial derivatives of L with respect to x, y, λ1, λ2, λ3, and λ4 and setting them equal to 0, we get the following set of equations: 4x - 2y - λ1 - λ2y - λ3 = 0 2y - 2x - λ1 - λ2x - λ4 = 0 x + y - 1 ≤ 0 xy - 3 ≤ 0 λ1 ≥ 0 λ2 ≥ 0 λ3 ≥ 0 λ4 ≥ 0 λ1(x + y - 1) = 0 λ2(xy - 3) = 0 From the complementary slackness condition, λ1(x + y - 1) = 0 and λ2(xy - 3) = 0. This implies that either λ1 = 0 or x + y - 1 = 0, and either λ2 = 0 or xy - 3 = 0. If λ1 > 0 and λ2 > 0, then x + y - 1 = 0 and xy - 3 = 0. If λ1 > 0 and λ2 = 0, then x + y - 1 = 0. If λ1 = 0 and λ2 > 0, then xy - 3 = 0. We now consider each case separately. Case 1: λ1 > 0 and λ2 > 0From λ1(x + y - 1) = 0 and λ2(xy - 3) = 0, we have the following possibilities: x + y - 1 = 0, xy - 3 ≤ 0 (i.e., xy = 3), λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0 x + y - 1 ≤ 0, xy - 3 = 0 (i.e., x = 3/y), λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0 x + y - 1 = 0, xy - 3 = 0 (i.e., x = y = √3), λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0 We can exclude the second case because it violates the constraint x, y ≥ 0. The first and third cases satisfy all the Kuhn-Tucker conditions, and we can check that they correspond to local minima of f subject to the constraints. For the first case, we have x = y = √3/2 and f(x, y) = -1/2. For the third case, we have x = y = √3 and f(x, y) = -2. Case 2: λ1 > 0 and λ2 = 0From λ1(x + y - 1) = 0, we have x + y - 1 = 0 (because λ1 > 0). From the first Kuhn-Tucker condition, we have 4x - 2y - λ1 = λ1y. Since λ1 > 0, we can solve for y to get y = (4x - λ1)/(2 + λ1). Substituting this into the constraint x + y - 1 = 0, we get x + (4x - λ1)/(2 + λ1) - 1 = 0. Solving for x, we get x = (1 + λ1 + √(λ1^2 + 10λ1 + 1))/4. We can check that this satisfies all the Kuhn-Tucker conditions for λ1 > 0, and we can also check that it corresponds to a local minimum of f subject to the constraints. For this value of x, we have y = (4x - λ1)/(2 + λ1), and we can compute f(x, y) = -3/4 + (5λ1^2 + 4λ1 + 1)/(2(2 + λ1)^2). Case 3: λ1 = 0 and λ2 > 0From λ2(xy - 3) = 0, we have xy - 3 = 0 (because λ2 > 0). Substituting this into the constraint x + y - 1 ≥ 0, we get x + (3/x) - 1 ≥ 0. This implies that x^2 + (3 - x) - x ≥ 0, or equivalently, x^2 - x + 3 ≥ 0. The discriminant of this quadratic is negative, so it has no real roots. Therefore, there are no feasible solutions in this case. Case 4: λ1 = 0 and λ2 = 0From λ1(x + y - 1) = 0 and λ2(xy - 3) = 0, we have x + y - 1 ≤ 0 and xy - 3 ≤ 0. This implies that x, y > 0, and we can use the first and second Kuhn-Tucker conditions to get 4x - 2y = 0 2y - 2x = 0 x + y - 1 = 0 xy - 3 = 0 Solving these equations, we get x = y = √3 and f(x, y) = -2. (b) Show that the minimal point does not have x=0.To show that the minimal point does not have x=0, we need to find the optimal value of x that minimizes f subject to the constraints and show that x > 0. From the Kuhn-Tucker conditions, we know that the optimal value of x satisfies one of the following conditions: x = y = √3/2 (λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0) x = √3 (λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0) x = (1 + λ1 + √(λ1^2 + 10λ1 + 1))/4 (λ1 > 0, λ2 = 0) If x = y = √3/2, then x > 0. If x = √3, then x > 0. If x = (1 + λ1 + √(λ1^2 + 10λ1 + 1))/4, then x > 0 because λ1 ≥ 0.

To know more about constraints, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17156848

#SPJ11

Answer:

x² + 34x + 104 = 0

x² + 34x = -104

x² + 34x + ((1/2)(34))² = -104 + ((1/2)(34))²

x² + 34x + 17² = -104 + 17²

x² + 34x + 289 = 185

(x + 17)² = 185

x + 17 = +√185

x = -17 + √185

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-7=-11x-25

5x+11x=-25+7

16x=18

x=18/16

x=3/2

The solution to the logarithmic equation \(\mathbf{log_2(x-6) = 4}\) is x =24

The logarithmic equation is given as:

\(\mathbf{log_2(x-6) = 4}\)

Apply exponential law of logarithm

\(\mathbf{(x-6) = 2^4}\)

Remove the brackets

\(\mathbf{x-6 = 2^4}\)

Add 6 to both sides

\(\mathbf{x-6 +6= 6+ 2^4}\)

Express 2^4 as 16

\(\mathbf{x-6 +6= 6+ 16}\)

Add -6 and 6

\(\mathbf{x= 6+ 16}\)

Add 6 and 16

\(\mathbf{x= 24}\)

Hence, the solution to the logarithmic equation \(\mathbf{log_2(x-6) = 4}\) is x =24

Read more about logarithmic equation at:

https://brainly.com/question/3181916

Answer:

\(x>-28\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following question:

\(-x\div4<7\)

In order to find the answer, we have to isolate the variable by multiplying four on both sides.

\(\frac{-x}{4} <7\)
\(\frac{-x}{4} =x\times4\)
\(7\times4=28\)
\(-x>28\)
\(-x\times-1=x\)
\(28\times-1=-28\)
\(x>-28\)

Hope this helps.

Answer:

x>-28

Step-by-step explanation:

First to cancel out the fraction times the whole fraction by the denominator 4 AND the 7 then multiply 7*4=28

This leaves you with

-x<28

To get rid of the -x divide both sides of the inequality by -x, This also changes the sign of the inequality to > Because you are Dividing both sides of the inequality

Negative/Negative =positive

Positive/Negative =Negative

So, You get
x>-28

Answer:

1. translated 35 units to the right and 10 units upwards- y= square root of x

2. translated 5 units to the right and 2 units up- y= x squared

2. translated 4 units to the left and 3 units down- y= absolute value of x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

fraction form: 1/4x

decimal form: 0.25x

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution of the system is x = 4 and y = 1.

To solve the system of equations using the elimination method, we can eliminate one variable by adding or subtracting the equations.

In this case, we can eliminate the variable "x" by multiplying the first equation by -2 and adding it to the second equation.

1. Multiply the first equation by -2:

  -8x - 4y = -36

2. Add the modified first equation to the second equation:

  -8x - 4y + 2x + 3y = -36 + 15

Simplifying the equation gives:

  -6x - y = -21

3. Solve the new equation for one variable. Let's solve for y:

  -y = -21 + 6x

   y = 21 - 6x

4. Substitute the value of y into one of the original equations. Let's use the first equation:

  4x + 2(21 - 6x) = 18

Simplifying the equation gives:

  4x + 42 - 12x = 18

  -8x = -24

   x = 3

5. Substitute the value of x back into the equation for y:

  y = 21 - 6(3)

  y = 21 - 18

  y = 3

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is x = 3 and y = 3.

To learn more about elimination method, click  here: brainly.com/question/29944642

#SPJ11

The probability is 0.4647.

To learn more about probability from the given link :

https://brainly.com/question/9793303

#SPJ4

a. There are a total of 676,000 different license plates that can be printed.

b.The vehicle can be ordered in 288 configurations.

c.Jeffrey can make 192 different outfits.

a. To find the number of different license plates that can be printed, we need to calculate the possibilities for each character position.

For the first two characters, each can be any digit from 0 to 9. So, there are 10 possibilities for each position.

For the next two characters, each can be any letter from A to Z. There are 26 letters in the English alphabet, so there are 26 possibilities for each position.

For the last two characters, each can be any letter from A to Z or any digit from 0 to 9. Since there are 26 letters and 10 digits, there are a total of 36 possibilities for each position.

To calculate the total number of different license plates, we multiply the number of possibilities for each position: 10 (for the first digit) * 10 (for the second digit) * 26 (for the third letter) * 26 (for the fourth letter) * 36 (for the fifth character) * 36 (for the sixth character) = 676,000.

b. To determine the number of configurations, we need to multiply the number of choices for each attribute.

For the exterior color, there are 6 options available.

For the interior color, there are 3 options available.

For the option packages, there are 4 options available.

By multiplying these choices together, we get:

6 (exterior colors) * 3 (interior colors) * 4 (option packages) = 72 configurations.

However, each of these configurations can also be ordered with or without an option package, so we need to double the number of configurations.

Therefore, the total number of configurations is:

72 configurations * 2 (with or without option package) = 144 configurations.

c. To calculate the total number of different outfits Jeffrey can make, we need to multiply the number of options for each item of clothing.

Jeffrey has 2 options for jackets, 3 options for shirts, 4 options for trousers, and 8 options for ties. To find the total number of outfits, we multiply these numbers together:

2 (jackets) * 3 (shirts) * 4 (trousers) * 8 (ties) = 192

This means that Jeffrey can make 192 different outfits by choosing any combination of colors/patterns for his jackets, shirts, trousers, and ties.

The multiplication principle, also known as the counting principle, is used to find the total number of outcomes when multiple choices are made independently. In this case, we are assuming that Jeffrey doesn't care about coordinating the different clothing items, so each item can be chosen freely from its available options.

It's important to note that this calculation assumes that Jeffrey will wear only one jacket, one shirt, one pair of trousers, and one tie at a time. If he were to wear multiple items of the same clothing type simultaneously, the number of outfits would be different.

Learn more about Number of different license plates

brainly.com/question/31889594

#SPJ11

Answer:

Can you give a better explanation pls or just a pic

Step-by-step explanation:

Main Answer:

Explanation:

Given that,

\(\frac{dA}{dt}\) = -4

The surface area of the snow ball = 4π\(r^{2}\)

Let the surface area = A

If A denotes the surface area and D the diameter then,

A = 4π\(r^{2}\) = 4π\((\frac{D}{2} )^{2}\)

⇒ A = π\(D^{2}\)

Differentiate with respect to r,

\(\frac{dA}{dD}\) = 2πD

By using chain rule,

\(\frac{dA}{dD}\) = \((\frac{dA}{dt})\)\((\frac{dt}{dD})\) = \(\frac{\frac{dA}{dt}}{\frac{dD}{dt}}\)

⇒ 2πD = \(-\frac{4}{\frac{dD}{dt}}\)

∴ \(\frac{dD}{dt}\) = \(-\frac{4}{2\pi\\D}\)

when D = 9,

\(\frac{dD}{dt}\) = \(-\frac{4}{18\pi}\)

∴ \(\frac{dD}{dt}\) = \(-\frac{2}{9\pi}\)

so, the diameter is decreasing at a rate of \(\frac{2}{9\pi}\) .

Answer:

"sixty-three hundredths of a Kilometer"

Step-by-step explanation:

Decimal measurements are read based on the place of their digits. In this case, Ajay would read this measurement as "sixty-three hundredths of a Kilometer". This is because the final digit of the decimal form measurement is in the "hundredths" position. One more to the right and it would be in the "thousandths" while one more to the left would be the "tenths"

The estimated probability that a randomly selected consumer will recognize Honda is 0.969.

To estimate the probability, we will use the proportion of consumers who knew of Honda out of the total number of consumers.

Given that:

Number of consumers who knew of Honda: 812

Number of consumers who did not know of Honda: 26

Total number of consumers:

= 812 + 26

= 838

Estimated probability of recognizing Honda:

= 812 / 838

= 0.969.

Read more about probability

brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

The probability that Marshall wins a prize on his second spin =  0.1875

Consider an event X = the number of spins until Marshall wins a prize.

Given that a prize wheel with 4 segments of equal size, one of which is labeled winner.

So, the sample space n = 4

For given event x, the possible outcomes = 1

Using the formula of probability,

p = x/n

p = 1/4

p = 0.25

So, the probability of success p = 0.25

q = 1 - p

q = 1 - 0.25

q = 0.75

To find the probability that Marshall wins a prize on his 2nd spin.

Using formula, \(P(X = k) = (1 - p)^{k-1}p\)

For  k = 2,

\(P(X = 2) = (1 - 0.25)^{2-1}\times 0.25\)

P(X = 2) = 0.75 × 0.25

P(X = 2) = 0.1875

Thus, the required probability is  0.1875

Learn more about the probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

took that couple days ago

Answer: When dividing by 10, 100, 1000 and so on, move the decimal point to the left as many places as there are 0s. So when dividing by 10, move the decimal point one place, by 100 two places, by 1000 three places and so on.

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

She will save 62.40

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the total amount she makes

hours times hourly rate

19.5 * 12.80

249.60

She saves 1/4 of this, so multiply by 1/4

1/4 * 249.60

62.40

She will save 62.40

Answer:

62.40

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement "a line segment is a part of a line that is bounded by two distinct end points and contains every point on the line between its endpoints." is True because a line segment is defined as a part of a line that is bounded by two distinct end points and contains all the points on the line between those endpoints.

A line segment is a part of a line that has two endpoints and connects them. It is the shortest distance between two points and has a definite length, but no width or height. A line segment can be part of a straight line or a curved line.

A line segment is a section of a line that is defined by two distinct end points and includes every point on the line between them. It is the basic building block of geometry and can be used to measure distances, angles, and shapes.

To learn more about line segment link is here

brainly.com/question/30072605

#SPJ4

Answer:

I do not know

Step-by-step explanation:

I do not know

The polar form of the complex number z = 2√2e^(iπ/4) is z = 2√2 cis(π/4).

In polar form, we have z = r * cis(θ), where r represents the magnitude and θ represents the angle. Here, the magnitude r = 2√2, which is obtained from the coefficient in front of the exponential term. The exponential term's argument results in the angle being equal to /4.

We may convert the polar form to the Cartesian form using Euler's formula,

e^(iθ) = cos(θ) + isin(θ).

Substituting the values, we have,

z = 2√2(cos(π/4) + isin(π/4)).

Simplifying further to get the value of z,

z = 2(1/√2) + 2(1/√2)i.

This gives us,

z = √2 + √2i.

As a result, z may be expressed in Cartesian form as √2 + √2i, an is √2, and b is √2.

To know more about cartesian form of complex number, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/31047219

#SPJ4

Complete question - Write the complex number z = 2√2e^iπ/4 in it's polar form, hence write the Cartesian form, giving our answer as z=a+bi, for real numbers a and b

Answer:

y= -5x + 9

Step-by-step explanation:

The total cost (4*$8 + 7*$5=$32 + $35=$67) is within the budget.

The system of inequalities is:

'

Graphically, the feasible region will be where these inequalities overlap.

One possible solution could be a=4 (4 bags of popcorn) and y=7 (7 drinks).

This satisfies all inequalities: the total items bought (4+7=11) meets the minimum requirement, the popcorn bags are at least 2, and the total cost (4*$8 + 7*$5=$32 + $35=$67) is within the budget.

Read more about system of inequalities here:

https://brainly.com/question/9774970

#SPJ1

The statement that the sum of any rational number and any irrational number will always be an irrational number is true.

The sum of any rational number and any irrational number will always be an irrational number. To prove this, let's consider a rational number, represented as a/b, where a and b are integers and b is not equal to 0. Additionally, let's consider an irrational number, represented as √2. When we add the rational number a/b and the irrational number √2, the result will be a + (√2)b, which is a combination of a rational number and an irrational number.

Since irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers, the sum a + (√2)b cannot be simplified to a rational number. Thus, it is an irrational number. Therefore, the statement that the sum of any rational number and any irrational number will always be an irrational number is true.

To learn more about rational number click here: brainly.com/question/19161857

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

- 5x + 3 = 2x - 1

or, 2x + 5x = 3 + 1

or, 6x = 4

or, x = 4/ 6

Therefore x = 2 /3

Hope it will help :)❤

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract

3

3

3

from both sides of the equation

−

5

+

3

=

2

+

1

−

5

+

3

−

3

=

2

+

1

−

3

2

Simplify

Subtract the numbers

Subtract the numbers

−

5

=

2

−

2

3

Subtract

2

2x

2x

from both sides of the equation

−

5

=

2

−

2

−

5

−

2

=

2

−

2

−

2

4

Simplify

Combine like terms

Combine like terms

−

7

=

−

2

5

Divide both sides of the equation by the same term

−

7

=

−

2

−

7

−

7

=

−

2

−

7

6

Simplify

Cancel terms that are in both the numerator and denominator

Divide the numbers

=

2

7

51025 to 63650 is the range that she would consider for a salary offer in that state.

Given:

A teacher is looking for a job in Connecticut and believes she should be paid in the middle 60% of teachers due to her experience.

μ = 57,337.

σ = 7500.

60% = 6/100 = 0.60.

The range that she would consider for a salary offer in that state.

P(a , x < b) = 0.60.

\(P(\frac{x}{y} < \frac{x}{y} < \frac{x}{y} )= 0.60\)

\(P(\frac{a-\mu}{s.t} < \frac{x-\mu}{s.t} < \frac{b-\mu}{s.t} )= 0.60\)

On comparing this with P(-0.842 < z < 0.842) = 0.60.

We get, \(\frac{a-\mu}{s.t} = -0.842\)   and    \(\frac{b-\mu}{s.t}= 0.842\)

\(a=-0.842\times7500+57.337 = 51024.84\)

\(b= 0.842\times7500+57.337=63649.159\)

Therefore, her range should be 51025 to 63650.

Learn more about Probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32232668

#SPJ4

Incomplete Question.

The average teacher’s salary in Connecticut (ranked first among states) is $57,337. Suppose that the distribution of salaries is normal with a standard deviation of $7500.

False. Each triangle in the STL file is defined by the vertices, but not necessarily by the inward pointing surface normal vector. The surface normal vector is often calculated based on the vertex positions.

False. The STL file is a mesh representation of the CAD model, and it does not contain all the information needed to fully reconstruct the original CAD model. It lacks information such as parametric features, assembly relationships, and design intent, making it difficult to recreate the exact original model.

The option "Increasing the heat exchange area for a heat exchanger" is NOT an advantage of using a lattice structure. Lattice structures are known for their lightweight properties, material-saving benefits, and simplified design and manufacturing processes.

However, increasing the heat exchange area for a heat exchanger is not typically associated with lattice structures. Heat exchangers usually rely on other design considerations, such as fin arrays or extended surfaces, to enhance heat transfer efficiency, rather than lattice structures.

Therefore, increasing heat exchange area is not a direct advantage of lattice structures.

Learn more about Vector click here :brainly.com/question/13322477

#SPJ11