A contract or agreement to do something that is prohibited by federal or state statutory law is illegal. As such, it is void from the outset and thus unenforceable. Also a contract this is tortious or call for an actin contrary to public policy is illegal and unenforceable.
An settlement is a manifestation of mutual assent by way of or extra men and women to each other. it's far a meeting of the minds in a commonplace goal, and is made via provide and popularity. An agreement can be proven from words, behavior, and in some cases, even silence. agreement manner that sentence elements fit. subjects have to consider verbs, and pronouns should accept as true with antecedents. Singular subjects need singular verbs; plural subjects need plural verbs. In grammar, wide variety refers to the two sorts of a phrase: singular (one) or plural (multiple).
A contract is an agreement, however an agreement isn't always a settlement. An settlement can be casual or it is able to be written; a contract may be verbal or written, however a settlement will always be enforceable if it includes positive necessities.
An settlement is a manifestation of mutual assent by way of or extra men and women to each other. it's far a meeting of the minds in a commonplace goal, and is made via provide and popularity. An agreement can be proven from words, behavior, and in some cases, even silence. agreement manner that sentence elements fit. subjects have to consider verbs, and pronouns should accept as true with antecedents. Singular subjects need singular verbs; plural subjects need plural verbs. In grammar, wide variety refers to the two sorts of a phrase: singular (one) or plural (multiple).
A contract is an agreement, however an agreement isn't always a settlement. An settlement can be casual or it is able to be written; a contract may be verbal or written, however a settlement will always be enforceable if it includes positive necessities.
Learn more about agreement here: https://brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ4
What personal story does Lou share to illustrate the broken judicial system at work? Explain and analyze why this story speaks to her point. If you watch the "ted talk" would you please answer this question?
Answer:
The answer is espanol is a language and is the 3rd most commonly spoken language.
please helppp
What is one way interest groups monitor public opinion about the government?
A. By conducting polls
B. By lobbying leaders
C. By forming political action committees
D. By filing lawsuits
Answer:
B
Explanation:
a texan from a small town that does not keep trial records has been granted a new trial, which will be retried in a higher court. what type of trial is it?
a texan from a small town that does not keep trial records has been granted a new trial, which will be retried in a higher court. The type of trial is appellate trial
A higher court evaluates the decisions or judgements rendered by a lower court during an appellate hearing or appeal, which is a legal procedure. Appellate courts review the procedures and decisions made by the trial court to make sure that they were fair and that proper law was applied.
In the given question, since a new trial has been allowed, it will be held in a higher court, it is likely that individual from small town has requested a higher court's review of the verdict from the prior trial. Any legal contradictions or issues raised by party appealing lower court's verdict will be taken into account by a higher court, which will then decide whether to affirm, reverse, change, or order a new trial, depending on its findings.
Read more about appellate court on:
https://brainly.com/question/29614649
#SPJ4
Do you think the pay for being a police officer is fair? Why or why not?
Answer:
In Pay, Reference Points, and Police Performance (NBER Working Paper No. 12202), Alexandre Mas maintains that when police officers are awarded salaries ... with low wages, but with wages below a reference point that they consider fair.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes because people would be bad and do things there not supposed too. Sometimes some police officers can do bad things but most of them enjoy there job and like helping people so they should be paid to something thats helping everyone. :)
Explanation:
Which statement is true about joint committees?
They are permanent, dedicated to working on a specific kind of bill.
They are primarily investigative, performing research and impact studies.
They contain members of both major political parties.
They are controlled by members of the majority party.
Answer:
C. They contain members of both major political parties.
Explanation:
Correct on Edg 2020
Answer:
C. They contain members from both houses of Congress
Explanation:
Edge 2022
What should a judge's sentencing decision be based on?
The current charged conduct of the defendant
Prior bad acts
his or her testimony in court
The victim's testimony
HELP ASAP
As a new attorney, to whom would you go to talk about how to balance attorney work and safeguarding the client needs in a case of border violence?
Public defender
Community defender
District attorney
Federal public defender
The thirteenth amendment was approved by congress on january 31, 1865. What did the amendment accomplish?.
The thirteenth amendment was approved by congress on January 31, 1865. The abolition of slavery the amendment accomplish. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What is Amendment?The term "amendment" refers to the changes, recreation, and development of legislation. Citizens benefit from the addition of rights. The amendment to the constitution is the Bill of fundamental 10 rights. The amendment's goal is to inform citizens about what is right and wrong.
The thirteenth Amendment was not founded on slavery or an involuntary system. The 13th amendment outlawed slavery States and states that the persons held as slaves, except as a punishment for an offense whereof the club shall have indeed been duly found guilty, shall exist within the United States." It was passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on Dec. 6, 1865.
As a result, the abolition of slavery the amendment accomplish thirteenth amendment. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on Amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ12
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
A. The popular sovereignty of slavery. B. The abolition of slavery. C. The suffrage of slaves. D. The expansion of slavery.Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views?
Answer:
if they use violence or threats especially against a certain person as it can cause emotional stress.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Voicing Unpopular opinions is apart of Everyone's constitutional Right, and isn't prohibited in any way but is limited.
Explanation:
Everyone has the right to voice their opinion, like who they Want to be President, or Samsung vs iPhone, whatever the matter is you have that right, but is limited, you are not allowed (Using your words) to cause a Public disturbance if their is no threat, like you can't call fire in a Movie theater if their is none, or you can't say "GUN" while the President is speaking or threaten some. It's just not allowed, these aren't considered an Opinion, their just disturbances.
classify the definition or example with the appropriate gas law.
"The pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume at constant temperature." - Boyle's Law"
The total pressure exerted by a mixture of gases is equal to the sum of the pressures exerted by each individual gas." - Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures"
The volume of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature at constant pressure." - Charles's Law"
The rate of effusion of a gas is inversely proportional to the square root of its molar mass." - Graham's Law of Effusion"
The pressure of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas present at constant temperature and volume." - "Avogadro's Law"
Explanation:
This statement describes the relationship between pressure and volume, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Boyle's Law.
The statement refers to the total pressure of a mixture of gases and the individual pressures exerted by each gas. It aligns with Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures.
This statement discusses the relationship between volume and temperature, suggesting a direct proportionality. It relates to Charles's Law.
The statement pertains to the rate of effusion of a gas and its molar mass, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Graham's Law of Effusion.
This statement refers to the relationship between pressure and the number of moles of gas, indicating a direct proportionality. It aligns with Avogadro's Law.
To know more about Boyle's Law, click here https://brainly.com/question/30367133
#SPJ11
6. A speed limit is best described as:
A - Substantive law
B - Procedural law
C - Local rules of a court
D - None of the above
7. State’s rights are outlined in the:
A - The 4 th Amendment to the U. B - The Federal Register
C - The 10 th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
D - The common Law
6. A speed limit is best described as Substantive law. Thus, the correct answer is option A.
7. State’s rights are outlined in the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Thus, the correct answer is option C.
The laws that specify how members of a society are expected to behave are known as substantive law. In contrast, procedural law—a collection of rules for creating, implementing, and upholding substantive law—is used to define and contrast this concept.
The Constitution reserves all other authorities to the individual States or to the people; neither the United States nor the States are given those rights by the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to clarify the relationship between the federal and state governments. According to the amendment, the federal government only has the authority that the Constitution expressly grants it.
Therefore, the appropriate options are A and C respectively.
To learn more on substantive law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8324784
#SPJ4
mention and clearly explain four essential ingredients for the existence of a contract
Answer:
For a contract to be legally binding it must contain four essential elements:
an offer
an acceptance
an intention to create a legal relationship
a consideration (usually money).
However it may still be considered invalid if it:
entices someone to commit a crime, or is illegal
is entered into by someone that lacks capacity, such as a minor or bankrupt
was agreed through misleading or deceptive conduct, duress, unconscionable conduct or undue influence.
what is RA 6675 The Generic Act of 1988
which type of case is most likely to be referred to the juvenile court by the police officer?
When police officers encounter juveniles who have committed offenses, they have the discretion to refer them to the juvenile court system or to handle the matter informally.
The type of case that is most likely to be referred to the juvenile court by a police officer depends on the severity of the offense and the age of the offender.
Generally, cases involving serious offenses such as violent crimes, drug offenses, and property crimes are more likely to be referred to the juvenile court system. These offenses require more formal handling and often involve the use of juvenile detention facilities.
In addition, cases involving repeat offenders or those who are at risk of harming themselves or others may also be referred to the juvenile court system. The juvenile court system provides resources for rehabilitation and treatment, which can help address the underlying issues that led to the offender's behavior.
Overall, police officers consider a variety of factors when deciding whether to refer a case to the juvenile court system. The ultimate goal is to ensure that the offender receives the appropriate level of intervention and support to prevent future offenses.
To know more about juveniles visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1336117
#SPJ11
Evaluate the Women's Compensation Act, 1987 (P.N.D.C.L 187) and it's adequacy in ensuring effective protection of employees affected by the pandemic.
Answer:
The Act was set up to improve the working conditions and welfare of the workers
Explanation:
The Acts makes arrangement for different types and forms of compensation and a decent wage/salary for workers. The ones who fall ill or have any form of when still engaged in the organization are to be taken care of.
It also ensures good severance packages for its workers. This acts would help in making sure those who fell ill during the pandemic are given some form of relief. The ones who are also likely lose to their jobs due to the pandemic are also to be duly compensated .
A first time DUI arrest can not only land you in jail, but the fines can be:
Group of answer choices
A) there are no fines; you only go to jail
B) at least 1 million dollars
C) easily charged on your credit card
D) more than $10,000
The fines for a first time DUI arrest can vary depending on the state, but they are typically in the range of $1,000 to $10,000. In some states, there are also mandatory jail sentences for first time DUI arrests. So, The correct answer is D. more than $10,000.
For a first DUI offense, there are additional consequences in addition to fines and jail time. These may consist of:
License revocation: For a set amount of time, usually between 90 days and a year, your driver's license will be suspended.
You might be compelled to have an ignition interlock device installed in your vehicle. With the help of this equipment, you cannot start your car after drin-king.
attending a DUI course You could have to go to DUI school. You will learn about the risks of dru-nk driving in this session, as well as how to prevent it. It's crucial to refrain from drink-ing and driving because the consequences of a first-time DUI arrest can be severe. If you are detained due to a DUI, it is important to speak to an attorney to discuss your options.
To know more about DUI :
https://brainly.com/question/32308136
#SPJ2
officers who patrol smaller areas, especially in small towns, tend to
Officers who patrol smaller areas, especially in small towns, tend to have closer relationships with the communities they serve.
This can lead to greater familiarity with local residents and businesses, as well as a deeper understanding of the unique challenges and needs of the area. Additionally, officers in smaller jurisdictions may have more flexibility in their duties and responsibilities, allowing them to respond to a wider range of situations and provide more personalized services to their community members.
However, this model of policing also has its limitations, as smaller departments may have more limited resources and less specialized training compared to larger law enforcement agencies.
Learn more about closer relationships here:
https://brainly.com/question/31794604
#SPJ11
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
Which statement best summarizes the purpose of Article IV of the Constitution?
Article IV outlines the powers given to state governments.
O Article IV outlines the powers given to the federal government.
O Article IV outlines the structure of the federal government.
O Article IV outlines the structure of the state governments.
Answer: Article IV outlines the structure of the state governments.
Explanation:
Article IV of the constitution describes the state government's organizational structure. Therefore, option D is correct.
What is article IV of the constitution?Article Four of the United States Constitution outlines the ties between the many states and between each State and the federal government of the United States. Additionally, it grants Congress power to oversee federal lands, including the territories, and to admit new states.
Every state is required to give every other state's public records, actions, and judicial decisions full faith and credit. Additionally, the Congress may lay forth in general legislation the conditions under which such activities, records, and procedures must be proved as well as their repercussions.
The advantages and immunities enjoyed by residents of the several states shall be available to each state's citizens.
Any individual who is accused of treason, a felony, or another crime in one state and is caught in another state must, upon demand from the administrative authority of the state from which he fled, turn himself in so that he can be extradited to the state where the offence was committed.
Learn more about article IV of the constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/7018575
#SPJ7
What is the next step after Congress proposes and approves an amendment
to the Constitution?
O A. The amendment is sent to the states for their approval.
B. The amendment is officially added to the Constitution
C. The Supreme Court decides whether the amendment is legal.
D. The president determines whether to veto the amendment.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
After 2/3 of Congress votes to pass an amendment it is sent to States for approval. 3/4 of the states (38) must approve before it is ratified to the U.S Constitution. This is done by a vote in the State Legislature or a special ratifying convention.
1. the theories and perspectives in this unit focus on the environmental and social
influence of crime. do you think that environmental and social conditions influence
crime? why or why not? between biological, psychological, and social factors,
which one do you think plays the biggest role in crime? why?--
Environmental and social factors do have an impact on crime. However, the factors that have the greatest influence are psychological.
What is crime?A crime is a term to refer to a voluntary wrongful or reprehensible action that according to the law must be reprimanded and prohibited.
When a person commits a crime many factors influence him to carry out this act, some of this influence is:
Environmental: It is the environmental factor that influences a person to commit a crime, generally refers to the influence of an environment on the behavior of a person to commit a crime.Social: This factor refers to the influence of social dynamics such as: stratification, segregation, discrimination, among others, that influence the behavior of one or more individuals to commit a crime.Psychological: This factor refers to the interpretation of reality and the autonomous thoughts of the individual to commit a crime.According to the above, it can be inferred that of the factors that influence a crime, the most important is the psychological factor because it has a greater impact on the individual's thinking.
Learn more about crime in: https://brainly.com/question/15691073
Human beings are the only animal accountable before the law discuss in critical thinking apparoach
Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.
One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.
Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.
Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.
the supremacy clause of the constitution declares which of the following: question 1 options: the president is the supreme commander of the armed forces the supreme court can veto legislation through an advisory opinion the supreme court is subject to recall by a 2/3rds vote in the senate national laws take precedence over state laws
Out of the above-mentioned alternatives, it may be said that the supremacy clause is formed with an intention to declare that the national laws take precedence over the state laws in the judicial branches. Therefore, the option D holds true.
The Supremacy Clause is an integral inclusion in the National Constitution of the United States. Furthermore, the supremacy clause also takes the regulation to maintain that the laws made by the federal authorities will have a precedence over those created under the state laws.
Learn more about the supremacy clause here:
https://brainly.com/question/2212707
#SPJ4
Complete question
the supremacy clause of the constitution declares which of the following: question 1 options:
the president is the supreme commander of the armed forces
the supreme court can veto legislation through an advisory opinion
the supreme court is subject to recall by a 2/3rds vote in the senate
national laws take precedence over state laws
HELP ASAP its due today!!
Which forensic tests increase the accuracy and reliability of evidence? Explain your choices.
Answer:
Forensics tests that increase accuracy and reliability include DNA and fingerprint testing.
Explanation:
DNA shows an individual and if their DNA is found it is likely that they have something to do with the crime or witnessed something. The same goes for fingerprints as well.
QUESTION 3 ality. (10) [26] 1 Define the main categories of fundamental human rights and freedom as contained in chapter 2 Bill of rights of the constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996.Prepare a presentation by power point presentation or newspaper articles relating to the following: 3.1.1 Access to social grant. 3.1.2 Access to health care. 3.1.3 Access to education. 3.1.4 Access to housing.
The main categories of fundamental human rights and freedoms as contained in Chapter 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 are:
Human dignityEqualityFreedomWhat are the main categories of fundamental human rights of the constitution of the Republic of South Africa?Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Everyone has the right to privacy, which includes the right to their personal information being kept confidential.
Everyone has the right to freedom of religion, belief and opinion, which includes the right to express and propagate their religion, belief or opinion. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, which includes the right to freedom of speech and the press.
Everyone has the right to freedom of association, which includes the right to form and join political parties, trade unions and other associations. Everyone has the right to vote, to stand for public office and to hold office.
Find out more on fundamental human rights at https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
URGENT 40 POINTS
Which suspects do not have to be read Miranda rights?
A.
those who are resisting arrest
B.
those who are on parole
C.
those who are from other countries
D.
those who are suspected of terrorism
Criminal justice essay
Begin with you pretending to be the President of the American Society of Criminology, a famous scholar with a major theory of your own right, delivering the annual Presidential keynote address. (You may want to look up in a research journal, like Criminology, what a Presidential Annual Address looks like) A certain amount of graded discussion will take place over this assignment along with further tips and hints, but here are general guidelines:
a) Use your own name, not one of a known criminologist, and use your own voice
b) Assume a fictitious theory of your own that is popular but need only be referenced vaguely as a point of reference; i.e., you do not have to spell out what your theory is for this assignment
c) Persuasively and definitively chart the course of the field, while naming names, major ideas (such as at least 10 or so concepts), perspectives, approaches, etc.
d) Be extremely more definitive about disciplinary and interdisciplinary issues such as whether psychology or sociology should more heavily chart the field, and why
e) Remind the audience of any enduring debates that can be resolved or cannot be
f) Delineate the contours of the field, what it should intellectually be more involved in
Answer:
I think you should go with A
Explanation:
For the simple fact that you are the one saying it and not someone else and it comes from your state of mind and not someone else's
If you caught an employee stealing one dollar’s worth of office supplies, what would you do? What about twenty-five dollars’ worth of supplies? One hundred dollars’? One thousand? Should employees be trained not to even take a pencil home? Would that type of training be worth the cost of the training itself?
Answer:
it's to hard to explain but why he is stealing stealing is not good he must be perfect on job and yes it cost of the training itself
Which administrative penalty can be imposed against a retail licensee that knowingly permitted the illegal sale, or negotiations for the sales, of controlled substances or dangerous drugs upon his or her licensed premises?
a. Fine b. Suspension of license c. Revocation of license d. All of the above
d. All of the above. The administrative penalty that can be imposed against a retail licensee that knowingly permitted the illegal sale, or negotiations for the sales, of controlled substances or dangerous drugs.
upon his or her licensed premises is d. All of the above. This means that a fine, suspension of license, or revocation of license can be imposed against the retail licensee depending on the severity of the offense and the discretion of the licensing authority. administrative penalty can be imposed against a retail licensee that knowingly permitted the illegal sale, or negotiations for the sales, of controlled substances or dangerous drugs upon his or her licensed premises.
learn more about sales here:
https://brainly.com/question/29436143
#SPJ11
Aceable Driving Test
1. The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the _______ insurance will covered.
A.) total amount
B.) bodily damage
C.) the maximum payment
D.) GAP Coverage
Answer:
A: the total amount it will cover I think
The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the total amount insurance will covered. Texas rules require you to have at least $30,000 in bodily injury coverage per person.
What is insurance coverage?
insurance coverage is the amount of liability that a person can cover or entitle for a particular loss or damage against insurance services.
Insurance is of many types like auto insurance, life insurance, vehicle insurance, and others.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about insurance coverage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15702391
#SPJ2