Hence, given that the county supported the Democratic nominee in the previous presidential election, it is likely that it will do so once more in the following election. This argument is not strong.
When no presidential candidate receives the majority of electoral votes, what happens?In the event that no candidate wins a majority of the electoral votes, the president is chosen by the House of Representatives from the top three finishers. For state delegation, one vote is cast. The vice president is selected by the Senate from the two vice presidential candidates with the most electoral votes.
What steps must be taken to nominate someone to run in a certain Class 9 election?A "nomination form" and a monetary "security deposit" are required to be submitted by everyone who wants to run for office. This information is made accessible to the public so that voters can make their decision based on the information provided by the candidates.
Learn more about presidential election: https://brainly.com/question/4690264
#SPJ4
why was the criminal justice system created ?? write 3 sentences detailing why it was created
The purpose of the criminal justice system is to protect society, punish offenders and rehabilitate criminals. It does this by following a process where the offender is arrested and tried for what they did wrong. If found guilty, they are punished with jail time or other punishments such as fines or community service.
I HATE YALL GAVE ME THE WRONG ANSWERS NOW I FREAKING HAVE ALL F'S
Answer:
rip
Explanation:
Answer:
I DID NOTHING HBDHBLKBC
Explanation:
vận dụng cặp phạm trù nguyên nhân và kết quả trong giả quyết tai nạn giao thông
Answer:
srryy i have know Idea im here for points
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the
Answer:
The second option, The Exclusionary Rule
Explanation:
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the exclusionary rule.
What is Exclusionary rule?The exclusionary rule bars the government from using the majority of evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio demonstrated that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment through an unreasonable search or seizure.
The exclusionary rule forbids the admission of evidence obtained illegally through a search and seizure. One of the primary goals of the exclusionary rule is to discourage law enforcement from conducting searches and seizures that violate the Fourth Amendment.
Death penalty supporters also claim that it deters qualifying criminal activity.
Therefore, based on the exclusionary rule evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court.
To learn more about the Exclusionary rule refer to:
brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ7
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was,
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the inclusionary rule exclusionary rule self-incrimation rule warrant rule
The nationwide suspicious activity reporting (sar) initiative (nsi) was established to: choose one enhance tracking of financial reporting requirements establish a unified approach to gather, document, analyze, and share terrorism-related suspicious activities provide local and state law enforcement agencies with a method to report sars on protest activities connect fusion centers to foreign country law enforcement agencies
The nationwide suspicious activity reporting (SAR) initiative was established for terrorism-related suspicious activities activities provide local and state law enforcement agencies with a method.
What is Suspicious Behaviour Reporting?A Suspicious Behaviour Reporting (SAR), as used in financial regulation, is a notification made by a financial institution regarding suspicious or possibly suspicious activity.In general, any financial transaction that the financial institution does not understand is unusual for that particular client or appears to be done solely for the purpose of concealing or obscuring another, a separate transaction must be reported.The specific criteria used to determine when a report must be made vary from country to country.The report is submitted to the nation's financial crime enforcement agency, which is often a specialized organization created to gather and analyze transactions before reporting them to the appropriate law enforcement.Suspicious Behaviour Reporting is the obligation of the financial institution's front-line workers to spot transactions that might be suspect.To learn more about Suspicious Behaviour Reporting with the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28179565
#SPJ4
expansionary policies often have short-term political _____, but policies that decrease inflation yield short-term political _____.
Expansionary policies often have short-term political benefits, but policies that decrease inflation yield short-term political costs.
Expansionary policies, which involve increasing government spending and lowering taxes, can stimulate economic growth and create jobs in the short term. This can be politically beneficial as it can lead to increased public support and potentially help politicians win elections. On the other hand, policies that aim to decrease inflation, such as raising interest rates or reducing government spending, can lead to short-term economic slowdown and higher unemployment. This can be politically costly as it can result in public dissatisfaction and potentially harm politicians' chances of being re-elected.
Policies that decrease inflation, like raising interest rates or reducing government spending, can help stabilize the economy in the long run but may cause short-term economic slowdowns and increased unemployment, leading to short-term political costs.
To Know more about economic slowdown
https://brainly.com/question/27448539
#SPJ11
european media policies echo ____________________ stances.
European media policies often echo democratic stances. These policies aim to promote freedom of speech, diversity, and plurality in the media landscape. The focus is on ensuring that citizens have access to accurate information and a wide range of opinions to make informed decisions, fostering an open and democratic society.
European media policies echo the stances of the European Union (EU) on various issues.
The EU's policies on media are designed to promote freedom of expression, ensure pluralism, and protect media diversity. The European Union has implemented policies that regulate the media market, promote public service media, and protect the independence and safety of journalists. In addition, the EU has a strong stance on protecting data privacy and fighting against disinformation and fake news. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is one of the most comprehensive data protection regulations in the world, which provides EU citizens with more control over their personal data. The EU has also established the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO) to monitor and counter disinformation campaigns.Moreover, the EU has been actively involved in promoting media literacy and providing funding to support the development of quality journalism. The Media Literacy for All initiative aims to equip citizens with the skills to navigate the digital world critically. Therefore, European media policies align with the EU's values and stances on issues such as freedom of expression, data privacy, and media literacy. These policies reflect the EU's commitment to upholding democratic values and ensuring a diverse and independent media landscape.Know more about the European union
https://brainly.com/question/30021063
#SPJ11
the which of the following Suggests that al
Solution to all social problems, including crime
traps formation of human beings, mutual deppe-
reduction of class structures. the Creats
ammunities of caring people and unie
Social Justice ?
A Radical theory
B British or left realism
C Peacemaking Crminology
D Femmist theory
Answer:
U bot
Explanation:
u suck at fortnite if u dont friend me and lets one v one
Benol9
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
_can be used to assess_
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
The four key elements of negligence are duty of care, breach of the duty of care, causation, and _____.
-warrantless search
-damages
-property
-allowance
Answer: Damages
Explanation:
The fourth key element of negligence is damages. It is an element of negligence that can include financial compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost wages, and property loss.
What is negligence?The most usual definition of negligence is that it is conduct, or a failure to act, that breaches a duty to take care. It breaks down into several elements, all of which must exist to give rise to a liability to pay compensation. There must be a duty owed.
It is a situation in which a person acts in a careless manner, which results in someone else getting hurt or property being damaged.
Learn more about negligence here,
https://brainly.com/question/12177947
#SPJ2
if, before the time for contract performance, one party communicates an intent not to perform, the other party can only wait to see if the repudiating party will decide to perform.
False. if, before the time for contract performance, one party communicates an intent not to perform, the other party can only wait to see if the repudiating party will decide to perform.
What is repudiating party?
When one party backs out of a deal with another, it is referred to as repudiation. Frequently, the party renouncing the contract is unable to fulfill its duties under the terms of the agreement because of financial constraints. The courts may decide on a contract breach. In other words, the other party to a contract has the right to accept the other party's repudiation and choose to end the deal if the other party refuses or cannot perform the obligations imposed on them by the contract. When you reject something or someone, you are expressing your adamant disagreement with them and your desire to have no more dealings with them. Leaders urged people to protest the violence by showing up in big numbers.
To learn more about repudiating party click on the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/17293791
#SPJ1
Which service is only provided by the federal government?
A : operation of police and fire departments?
B: garbage collection
C: national defense
D: setting education standards for children
what are factors presented that makes the witness reliable? in the case of tyrone briggs
Answer:
which organ is responsible in dealing with constitional disputes?
please help me with this question
Sole Power? Thats all that I can think of
Which city formed the first professional metropolitan police force?
London is the city that formed the first professional metropolitan police force in the year 1829.
What was the first metropolitan police force?In history, the first Metropolitan Police Service was founded in 1829 by Robert Peel under the Metropolitan Police Act 1829 and on 29 Sep. of the year which led to the first constables of the service that appeared on the streets of London.
As the Metropolitan Police Act 1829 established a full-time, professional and centrally-organised police force for the greater London area under the control of the Home Secretary, then, London is the city that formed the first professional metropolitan police force in the year 1829.
Read more about first metropolitan police
brainly.com/question/17253078
#SPJ1
In which year was the endangered species act signed into law?
When turning you should give the proper signal
Liberal constructionists want Congress to _____.
restrict the war powers of the President
create new powers, as needed, over time
only use the powers expressed in Article I
interpret executive and judicial decisions
Answer:
last option
Explanation:
A person with a strict interpretation of the constitution wants the government to only perform the powers given to them in the constitution. If the constitution does not explicitly give the power to an individual or group (like the President, Congress, or the Supreme Court) than that group/individual can not perform that duty.
On the other hand, those individuals who think that the constitution is flexible and that some powers can be "assumed" would fall under the category of having a loose interpretation of the constitution.
What was the law that required men of certain ages to serve in the military?.
Answer:
selective service act
Explanation:
congress passed the selective service act into law wich required men in the U.S. between ages 21 and 30 to register for military service.
how would you fix the us bail system
Answer:
I wouldn't 'fix' the bail system. I would terminate it completely. For many obvious reasons. When someone is arrested they arn't arrested for just going about their day, buying smoothies and what not. They've done something. And they shouldn't be granted they're freedom just because someone has enough money to pay for it. I think its wrong.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
august vollmer's most daring innovation was the idea of a(n):
Mintzberg sostiene la hipótesis de que si el núcleo operativo se automatiza la organización se vuelve más flexible. Explique por qué este autor sostiene tal cosa.
Answer:
which language is this?
therapists have a legal, professional, and ethical obligation to assess whether clients may:
Therapists have a legal, professional, and ethical obligation to assess whether clients may: harm themselves or others.
Therapists have a legal, professional, and ethical obligation to assess whether clients may pose a risk of harm to themselves or others. This duty is rooted in the principle of duty to warn or duty to protect, which requires therapists to take appropriate action if they have reason to believe that their clients may harm themselves or others.
Assessing the risk of harm is an important part of the therapeutic process, as it helps therapists make informed decisions regarding the client's safety and well-being. If a therapist determines that there is a serious and imminent risk of harm, they are obligated to take appropriate steps to mitigate the risk, which may include involving the necessary authorities or providing necessary interventions or referrals.
It's important to note that the specific obligations and legal requirements may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific guidelines and regulations governing the practice of therapy in a particular region or country. Therapists are expected to adhere to their professional codes of ethics and follow the laws and regulations applicable to their practice.
Learn more about Therapists:
https://brainly.com/question/25822797
#SPJ11
C.
If they are convicted, what should their punishment be?
Answer:
Their punishment should be ten to twenty-five years in prison with chance of parole because of the circumstances they were in.
would procedures in a criminal trial be the same as those in a civil trial. why or why not
Answer:
no because they are two different bodies of law they create justice system
Should people living with HIV be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status to prospective partners; why or why not? Should a participant be legally required to disclose, if they have taken precautions to limit the transfer of HIV?
No, people living with HIV should not be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status.
HIV is a virus, rather than a crime, and its transmission between consenting adults should not be criminalized. While disclosure of HIV status is important for reducing the risk of transmission, forcing those with HIV to disclose is not always in the interests of public health, and can be a violation of autonomy and privacy.
The legality of disclosing one's HIV status should be left to the individual to decide, and if other precautions have been taken, it should not be legally required.
To know more about HIV , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31765366
#SPJ4
List four (4) exceptions for obtaining a search warrant to search a house, car, or person. For each exception given, provide a brief example.
Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.
(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.
(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.
(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.
Most traditional criminal offenses (murder, theft, arson) are defined and tried at the:
a. state level
b. federal level
c. appellate level or
d. federal and state levels equally
a. state level. Most traditional criminal offenses such as murder, theft, and arson are primarily defined and tried at the state level.
The laws and statutes pertaining to these offenses are typically established by individual states rather than the federal government. State criminal codes outline the specific elements of each offense, the corresponding penalties, and the procedures for trial and prosecution. State courts, including trial courts and appellate courts, handle the majority of criminal cases involving these offenses.
While there are federal laws and courts that deal with certain criminal offenses, such as those involving federal jurisdiction or violations of federal statutes, the majority of traditional criminal offenses fall within the purview of state criminal justice systems.
Learn more about federal government here:
https://brainly.com/question/14858877
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is true of the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
A. They are only imposed on foreign officials.
B. They are only imposed on foreign companies.
C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
D. Fines imposed on individuals do not exceed $10,000.
E. If corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, only the intermediaries are fined.
The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.
Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.
Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ11