you should not start across an intersection if you know you will block the intersection when the light turns red:

Yes, it is legal for a shooter to catch his/her own shot off of the rebounder/frame if they follow the rules of the game and meet the requirements for the use of a rebounder.

A rebounder is a device used in basketball to help players improve their shooting skills. It is a rectangular frame with a net or bungee cords attached to it, which returns the ball back to the player after it is shot.

A rebounder is a training device that helps basketball player improve their rebounding skills. A basketball player has to be able to catch the ball after it has bounced off the rim or backboard.

A rebounder is used to simulate these situations in practice. Rebounders are available in different sizes and styles to suit different players’ needs and preferences.

They can be used for solo practice or team training sessions. A rebounder is a valuable tool for basketball players who want to improve their skills.

Learn more about rebounder from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/21272179

#SPJ11

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Our system has checks and balances between the branches of Government. These checks and balances maintain distributed power but they can make bills becoming laws a much more difficult process.

The height of the gap between the door frame and the lorry is 80 cm.

4. the boy has grown by (1.5 m - 1.21 m) = 0.29 m.

5. to calculate the height of the gap between the door frame and the lorry, we subtract the height of the lorry from the height of the garage door: 3.75 m - 2.95 m = 0.8 m.

to convert this to centimeters, we multiply by 100: 0.8 m * 100 cm/m = 80 cm. in question 4, the boy has experienced a growth of 0.29 meters. this indicates that he has become taller during the summer holidays. growth in height is a common occurrence during childhood and adolescence as the body undergoes various physiological changes. the difference between the current height of 1.5 meters and the previous height of 1.21 meters represents the amount by which he has grown.

in question 5, the height of the garage door is given as 3.75 meters, and the height of the lorry is 2.95 meters. to determine the height of the gap between the door frame and the lorry, we subtract the height of the lorry from the height of the garage door. this calculation reveals that the gap measures 0.8 meters. converting this measurement to centimeters by multiplying by 100 yields a gap height of 80 centimeters.

understanding measurements, such as growth in height and the difference in heights between objects, is important in various contexts, from monitoring development to assessing clearance and space requirements in practical scenarios like fitting a vehicle through a garage door.

Learn more about physiological here:

https://brainly.com/question/9311395

#SPJ11

Stella is fifteen years old, and according to most states laws, she would be considered a minor until she turns eighteen. Correct answer is b. eighteen.

This means that she is not legally capable of entering into a contractual agreement on her own. In general, contracts require the agreement of all parties involved to be legally binding. However, minors lack the legal capacity to consent to a contract, which means that any contractual agreement that Stella enters into may be considered voidable at her option.
There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as contracts for necessities like food, shelter, and clothing, which are enforceable even if made with a minor. Additionally, contracts signed by minors can sometimes be ratified once they reach the age of majority. Still, in most cases, minors are not legally bound by any contractual agreements they enter into, and they can choose to void them if they wish.
In conclusion, Stella would be considered a minor until she turns eighteen, and therefore would not have the legal capacity to enter into a contractual agreement. It's important to keep in mind that the laws regarding minors and contractual agreements may vary from state to state, so it's always a good idea to consult with an attorney to determine the specific rules in your area.

To know more about contractual visit:

brainly.com/question/13093817

#SPJ11

Explanation:

only claim crédits since the 3

Answer:

In 1963, The supreme court unanimously in favor of the Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts

Answer:

What I liked about the verbal and nonverbal messages I saw in this video, First I absolutely lovedthe song. I have liked the Sick Puppies for a while and I thought the song was beautiful, and it gives the message that some times all someone needs is a hug. As Juan Mann stands in the street many people walk by him laughing and staring at him, then someone comes and hugs him. After I watched the video I looked up the lyrics of the some and read the information from the free hugs campaign website.

Explanation:

What is the opportunity cost of not doing something?

Opportunity cost is the value of something when a particular course of action is chosen. Simply put, the opportunity cost is what you must forgo in order to get something.

Answer:

The opportunity cost is time spent studying and that money to spend on something else. A farmer chooses to plant wheat; the opportunity cost is planting a different crop, or an alternate use of the resources (land and farm equipment). A commuter takes the train to work instead of

Justice Rehnquist intended for his statement to convey how the court's ruling will alter and complicate the application of the statute governing the first-trimester abortions.

Justice Rehnquist questioned the scope and the significance of the law and questioned whether it was really that important to prevent the state from getting involved in the matters of the abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy after the court based its argument on the fundamental constitutional right to privacy or liberty. Justice Rehnquist thought that using the law would become more difficult as a result of the court's ruling in the matter.

To know more about Abortions:

https://brainly.com/question/28459534

#SPJ4

Answer:

Not sure, but this helps! :)

Explanation:

The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.

Answer:

Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.

Explanation:

Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .

Answer:

D

Explanation:

In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.

Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.

Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."

Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891

#SPJ4

Answer:

We are a nation of laws, and not of man.

Explanation:

When Paul transferred the notice to Hilda, who promised to pay $7,500 for it. After Hilda had paid Paul $5,000 of the promised $7,500, Hilda found out that Mike had a protection: the tractor changed into faulty then she has the proper to collect or get $7,500 from Mike.

This is the case of Holder in Due course (HDC). Haldia has accepeted the notice from Paul for cosideration. According to Haldia, She isn't always conscious that the notice has any protection or claims towards it. That is, she is nowhere conscious that the tractor of Paul changed into faulty in nature. She has simply taken into consideration it for the fee purpose. Hence, Haldia turns into the Holder in Due Course. As a result, she has each proper to implement the contract. In different words, she has the proper to get $7,500 from Mike.

Defence and protection are each accurate approaches to spell the equal word. The distinction among them, the reality that one's spelled with a c and the alternative with an s, comes right all the way down to the a part of the sector wherein they may be used. In the United States, humans spell it with an s—protection.

Learn more about defense visit : brainly.com/question/22809074

#SPJ4

Answer:

Appellate :)

Explanation:

Answer:

in think the answer is panel

A motorist should keep at least 100 feet behind a signaling.

Drivers, often known as motorists, must pay attention to pedestrians and avoid using bike lanes.

The term "motorists" is frequently used in news reports when discussing groups of drivers, such as all of the drivers in Chicago's downtown or the rural drivers on two-lane highways.

Motorist is another word for "driver," which initially originated in the late 19th century, around the time the first autos did, and originally meant "motor car driver." Motorists need to be alert of pedestrians and stay out of bike lanes.

The word "motorists" frequently appears in news reports when discussing drivers as a group, such as all the motorists in downtown Chicago.

To know more about the Motorist visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1114291

#SPJ9

The theory of "proportionality" states that punishment should be proportional to the crime committed. It emphasizes a fair and balanced approach to sentencing, ensuring that the severity of punishment aligns with the gravity of the offense.

The theory of "proportionality" in the context of punishment asserts that the severity of a punishment should correspond to the seriousness of the crime committed.

It suggests that the punishment should be proportional or equal in measure to the harm caused by the offense.

This principle aims to ensure fairness and justice in the criminal justice system, discouraging excessive or overly lenient punishments.

Proportionality considers factors such as the nature and extent of harm, the intent of the offender, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation in determining an appropriate and just punishment.

Learn more about  theory of proportionality here:

https://brainly.com/question/14561081

#SPJ4

Answer:

Aggressive driving has been a problem on our roadways for a while, and it seems to only be getting worse. Incidents of screaming, rude gestures, and sometimes even violence are reported frequently on our roadways to the point where it has earned its own name: road rage. Learn what causes road rage, whether you are prone to it, and how you can help to keep our roads safe by not giving in to road rage.