It is true that you can be arrested for not stopping when the vehicle performing a stop is a marked law enforcement vehicle.
The laws of the road dictate that every vehicle must stop if there is a red light on the road in order to maintain traffic & resume whenever the signal is the green.
When someone violates a traffic or road safety rule, they will be fined and, in extreme situations, their driving privileges will be terminated, making it impossible for them to operate a vehicle.
In the illustrated situation, it is stated that a person may be detained for failing to stop when a vehicle making the stop is clearly identified as a law enforcement vehicle. The use of any type of drug or alcohol while operating a motor vehicle is strictly forbidden in the United States, and violators face harsh penalties including fines.
To know more about law enforcement vehicle:
brainly.com/question/22021830
#SPJ4
As we get into the materials we start with a question, "why" do we need laws? Please explain with several examples from the news as to the purpose and functions of law in society.
In order to preserve order, safeguard individual rights, and foster a just and peaceful cohabitation, laws serve a variety of objectives and tasks that are fundamental to society.
The framework for preserving public safety and order is established by laws. For example, traffic regulations control vehicle movement and guarantee the safety of motorists and pedestrians.
To protect people's liberties and rights, Laws are created. They offer a framework for the legal defense of human rights, including the rights to life, liberty, and property.
For settling conflicts and disagreements in a fair and unbiased manner, laws offer a method. To resolve disagreements between people, groups, in a society, or even nations, courts interpret and apply the law.
Learn more about Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15439594
#SPJ4
14. john has inherited 300 acres of land in texas. since he has no reason to visit texas, he has never seen the land. alex and samantha have moved onto the land and built a log home. they have started using the land and have even fenced much of it in. there is no mortgage on the land and john doesn't receive a tax bill because alex and samantha pay the yearly taxes. after the statutory period in texas has run, alex and samantha would become the owners of the land.
Option 4 is Correct. Texas property totaling 300 acres has been left to John. John doesn't get a tax bill because Alex and Samantha pay the yearly taxes, he has no incentive to travel to Texas, and there is no mortgage on the property.
Around San Felipe de Austin, the colony's hub, which served as the center for the majority of the labors, three groups were organized. From the area of present-day Brenham, Navasota, and La Grange to the Gulf of Mexico, the colonists chose the rich bottomlands of the Brazos, Colorado, and San Bernard rivers. The colonization agreement stipulated that each agricultural family would acquire one labor (about 177 acres), and each ranching family would receive one sitio (about 4,428 acres).
Although they were legally planters, a sizable portion of the colonists identified as stock raisers due to the evident benefits. As a result, the east bank of the Brazos from the Gulf to what is now Brazos County was quickly completely populated. Each family's sitio was to have a frontage on the river equal to about one-fourth of its length.
Learn more about Texas Visit: brainly.com/question/25723904
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
John has inherited 300 acres of land in texas. since he has no reason to visit texas,
1. he has never seen the land.
2. alex and samantha have moved onto the land and built a log home.
3. they have started using the land and have even fenced much of it in.
4. there is no mortgage on the land and john doesn't receive a tax bill because alex and samantha pay the yearly taxes.
5. after the statutory period in texas has run, alex and samantha would become the owners of the land.
A spouse can be provided information such as hospital
admission dates as long as they have which validating
information? Select all that apply.
Social security number
Marriage Contract
Date of birth
Driver's license
Answer:
Social Security number and Marriage contact
Agency in Arizona is created
A) exclusively as the result of a signed employment agreement
B) when a principal has delegated authority, and a salesperson or broker accepts it.
C) between a brokerage and licensees employed by an employing broker.
D) when in accordance with the Statute of Frauds.
The correct answer is C) between a brokerage and licensees employed by an employing broker.
In Arizona, the creation of agency is primarily governed by the Arizona Department of Real Estate and the Arizona Revised Statutes related to real estate brokerage. According to these regulations, agency relationships are established between a brokerage firm and the individual licensees who are employed by an employing broker.
When a licensee becomes affiliated with a brokerage, they enter into an employment agreement with the broker, which outlines the terms and conditions of their association. This agreement establishes the agency relationship between the brokerage and the licensee. The licensee agrees to work under the supervision and direction of the employing broker and to adhere to the brokerage's policies and procedures.
The agency relationship created in this context is known as a "brokerage agency" or "employment agency" relationship. It defines the legal responsibilities and obligations of the licensee towards the brokerage and its clients. The licensee acts as the agent of the brokerage and represents the brokerage's interests in real estate transactions.
It's important to note that the creation of agency in Arizona is not exclusively dependent on a signed employment agreement or the Statute of Frauds. While an employment agreement may be required for clarity and documentation purposes, the agency relationship is primarily formed when a licensee is employed by an employing broker and agrees to act as the broker's representative in real estate transactions.
In summary, agency in Arizona is created between a brokerage and licensees employed by an employing broker. The employment agreement solidifies this agency relationship, and licensees act as agents of the brokerage in real estate transactions.
for more questions on brokerage
https://brainly.com/question/30161110
#SPJ8
Imagine two young men who commit an act of vandalism. One of them gets caught and goes to jail, but the other is not identified and goes to college. There is a probability that the one who goes to jail may become a criminal while there is possibly an equal probability that the one who goes to college will have a successful life. What does this suggest about the present system? How could one improve it?
Answer:
This suggest that the current system needs to be improved. Ask the person who was put in jail if he had anyone working with him, in exchange the criminal who was put in jail could have 3-5 years off his sentence.
Explanation:
Pls mark Brainliest with the crown
the u.s. supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. true of false
It is true to say that the U.S. Supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Supreme Court said on Monday that a choice last term holding that the Constitution requires consistent jury decisions for state criminal preliminaries doesn't matter retroactively.
The decision is a misfortune for Thedrick Edwards and many others in Oregon, Louisiana and Puerto Rico, purviews that permitted non-consistent decisions under the steady gaze of the High Court's choice last year in Ramos v. Louisiana.
The 6-3 greater part choice was written by Equity Brett Kavanaugh, who was joined by the court's other moderate individuals.
In her contradiction, Equity Elena Kagan, joined by the court's other two liberal individuals, composed that last year's choice "accompanies a commitment, or in any event."
"On the off chance that the right to a consistent jury is so key - in the event that a decision delivered by a partitioned jury is 'no decision by any means' - then Thedrick Edwards shouldn't consume his time on earth in the slammer more than two hearers' resistance. I consciously disagree," she composed.
To know more about court,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29786682
#SPJ4
FILL THE BLANK.
______ is that it may be legally discovered by another person and patented.
One risk of disclosing an invention or innovation is that it may be legally discovered by another person and patented, potentially depriving the original inventor of exclusive rights.
When an invention or innovation is disclosed to the public without appropriate protection, such as a patent, it becomes part of the public domain. This means that anyone can access and use the information, including competitors or individuals who may seek to patent the idea themselves. If another person discovers the disclosed invention independently and files a patent application before the original inventor, they may obtain legal rights over the invention. This can be a significant setback for the original inventor, as they may lose the ability to control or profit from their own creation.
To mitigate this risk, inventors often take steps to protect their inventions before disclosure. This may include filing a patent application or keeping the invention confidential through non-disclosure agreements or trade secrets. By obtaining patent protection or maintaining secrecy, inventors can reduce the likelihood of someone else legally discovering and patenting their invention, thereby preserving their exclusive rights and potential commercial advantages.
Learn more about patent here:
https://brainly.com/question/29743504
#SPJ11
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
what is the main difference between contracts discharged due to operation of law and contracts discharged due to acts of the parties?
The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, safeguards individuals from illogical quests and seizures by public authority. The Fourth Amendment, nonetheless, isn't an assurance against all inquiries and seizures, but just those that are considered incredible under the law.
An Individual accused in any Territory of Conspiracy, Lawful offense, or other Wrongdoing, who will escape from Equity, and be tracked down in another State, will on Request of the leader Authority of the State from which he escaped, be conveyed up, to be eliminated to the State having Purview of the Wrongdoing.
Other deeply grounded special cases for the warrant prerequisite incorporate consensual pursuits, certain concise investigatory stops, looking through occurrences to a substantial capture, and captures of things on display. There is no broad exemption for the Fourth Amendment warrant prerequisite in public safety cases.
To learn more about Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/29799909?
#SPJ4
Is it legal to go to someone’s house to peaceful confront them about a scam?
Depends on what they were scamming people with
4. What is the leading critique of the electoral college?
which progressive reformers tend to be the least successful at influencing legislation and at what level?
Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt were the progressive reformers tend to be the least successful at influencing legislation and at the union level.
Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson both increased the federal government's authority to impose restrictions on the private sector and put in place safeguards for workers, consumers, and the environment.
The approval of numerous important pieces of legislation, including multiple amendments to the US Constitution, was effectively influenced by progressive reformers. The Seventeenth Amendment permitted senators to be elected directly, the Eighteenth Amendment outlawed the sale of alcohol, and the Nineteenth Amendment granted the right to vote to women. The Sixteenth Amendment established a federal income tax.
To learn more about progressive reformers, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/30609053
#SPJ4
proof these moderators are not so good at their jobs
A tenant's right to withhold rent as an action taken under constructive eviction will generally be upheld by Georgia courts only if the
A)
tenant has moved out and shown that the property is unfit for habitability.
B)
landlord does not allow the tenant who made repairs to deduct that cost from the rent.
C)
tenant can document how the conditions in the property occupied violates their quiet enjoyment.
D)
tenant has taken on the costs of repairing the damage to the occupied property.
A tenant's right to withhold rent as an action taken under constructive eviction will generally be upheld by Georgia courts only if the- A) tenant has moved out and shown that the property is unfit for habitability.
Tenants have the legal right to adequate housing, which means that they must be capable of living in a rental unit in good circumstances, in accordance with Georgia landlord-tenant legislation and the Federal Fair Housing Act. On the contrary hand, every tenant in Georgia is entitled to fair and equal treatment from his landlord under the law. Learn more about the Federal Fair Housing Act in Georgia. If the damage goes beyond ordinary wear and tear, they may also request repairs under their tenant rights. The renter may seek legal counsel and damages if the landlord doesn't make these repairs within a reasonable period of time.
To know more about tenants rights:
https://brainly.com/question/14998321
#SPJ4
Chapter 9 explored various pre-trial identification procedures used by law enforcement in the criminal justice system as well as the use of certain DNA evidence. Read the following questions and post your responses to the discussion board. - Many states have adopted laws which require offenders, as well as arrestees, to submit DNA samples (i.e., cheek cell swabs). Do you believe that this is appropriate? If so, in which cases should it be required? Last week we discussed how a citizen, under the 4th Amendment, may be subject to a full custodial arrest for a fine only offense. Full custodial arrests, as a matter of course, require the collection of personal identifying information such as a photograph (i.e., mug shot), fingerprints, etc. Should the collection of a DNA sample, through the minimally evasive means of taking a inner-cheek swab, be part of this booking process in all cases? In our modern age, is this another piece of information which should be collected at any arrest? If so, why? If not, why not? What limitations, if any should be imposed upon the collection and preservation of this information by the government?
1. I believe it is appropriate for offenders to be required to submit DNA samples, as it can be a valuable tool for criminal investigations and maintaining public safety. It should be required in cases involving serious crimes where there is a higher risk to public safety, such as violent offenses or those with significant societal impact.
2. The collection of a DNA sample through a minimally evasive means like an inner-cheek swab should be part of the booking process in all cases of full custodial arrests. DNA evidence can provide valuable investigative leads and help in identifying and apprehending suspects. In our modern age, where advancements in DNA technology have proven instrumental in solving cold cases and exonerating the wrongfully convicted, collecting DNA samples at every arrest can aid in promoting justice and protecting public safety.
3. The collection and preservation of DNA information by the government should have limitations to ensure privacy and prevent abuse. Safeguards should be in place to regulate the use, storage, and access to DNA data. Strict guidelines should be followed to prevent misuse of DNA samples and protect individuals' rights. Access to DNA databases should be limited to authorized personnel for legitimate law enforcement purposes, and strict protocols should be established for the retention and disposal of DNA samples to avoid unwarranted retention of personal genetic information.
To learn more about DNA evidence, here
https://brainly.com/question/30050406
#SPJ4
Scenario: You just joined the FBI as a Jr. Forensic Accountant. You are assigned the " Goldsmith Worldwide Investment " case. FB is investigating if this company is involved in a Ponzi scheme.
(A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors. Ponzi schemes are named after Charles Ponzi. In the 1920s, Ponzi promised investors a 50% return within a few months for what he claimed was an investment in international mail coupons.)
The subject company, Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, has been advertising a high-yield investment opportunity; investing in gold mines in Argentina. Several of the investors have filed complaints with the FBI, each reporting that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments promises 35% annual return on investments but has failed to deliver. You subpoena the Bank the Goldsmith is associated with. You consolidated all files and information received from the bank and start to apply IMPACT model you learned from Queens College's "Data Analytics for Accountant " to put the puzzle together and present the case to the Head of Department.
Objectives:
Goal - Apply IMPACT Model and all tools and techniques learned from the Spring 2022 - Data Analytics for Accountants to solve the FBI case. All questions need to be answered carefully with qualitative and quantitative support.
A. Identify Question - 1pt
What are the three questions needed to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case?
B. Master Data - 1pt
You have created the consolidated worksheet - see " 6628" tab.
What are the three + data tables you need in order to put this " 6628" consolidated worksheet together? what are the primary key and secondary key to connect them?
C. Perform Analysis – 7 pts - Please indicate technique used and show your work.
Just like the PWC case, you will choose techniques to help you identify issues and draw your conclusions.
1. Determine the total investors funds received. -1pt
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median and Mode ? -2 pts
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines. -1 pt.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. - 2 pt
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. -1pt
D. Communication - 1pt
6. What are your conclusions?
Answer & Explanation:
A. Identify Question:
1. Are the promised returns of 35% annual on investments unrealistic or unusually high?
2. Is the company primarily paying existing investors with funds from new investors?
3. Is there evidence of misrepresentation or false advertising regarding the investment opportunity?
B. Master Data:
To put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together, the following data tables are needed:
1. Investors Table:
- Primary Key: Investor ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional identifying information like name or contact details can be used)
2. Investment Transactions Table:
- Primary Key: Transaction ID
- Secondary Key: Investor ID (foreign key)
3. Company Revenue Table:
- Primary Key: Revenue ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional information like revenue source or period can be used)
C. Perform Analysis:
1. Determine the total investors' funds received.
Technique: Summarizing
- Sum the values in the "Investment Amount" column of the Investment Transactions Table.
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median, and Mode?
Technique: Statistical Analysis
- Filter the Investment Transactions Table for dividend payments.
- Sum the dividend amounts to calculate the total dividends paid.
- Count the unique investors who received dividends.
- Identify the investor(s) with the highest dividend amount.
- Calculate the mean, median, and mode of dividend amounts.
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.
Technique: Filtering and Summarizing
- Filter the Company Revenue Table for revenue related to the Argentinian gold mines.
- Sum the revenue amounts to determine the total business revenue.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend.
Technique: Data Visualization (e.g., line chart or bar chart)
- Create a visual representation of the investment inflows and outflows over time.
- Plot the investment amounts (inflows) and dividend amounts (outflows) on the chart.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure.
Technique: Examination and Documentation
- Review the consolidated worksheet and identify any suspicious assets or transactions that may be subject to seizure.
D. Communication:
6. Conclusions:
Based on the analysis using the IMPACT model and the techniques mentioned above, the following conclusions can be drawn:
- The total investors' funds received can be determined by summing the investment amounts.
- Total dividends paid can be calculated, along with information on the number of investors receiving dividends, the investor(s) receiving the highest amount, and statistical measures such as mean, median, and mode.
- Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines can be identified by filtering and summing the relevant revenue amounts.
- The trend of investment inflows and outflows can be depicted using data visualization techniques.
- Potential assets for seizure can be identified by examining suspicious transactions and documentation.
Overall, the analysis will provide insights into the financial activities of Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, helping to determine if there are indications of a Ponzi scheme.
A. Identify QuestionThere are three questions that can help to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case:
Does the investment opportunity promise unusually high returns?
Are early investors paid returns using the investments of new investors?
Is there a lack of clarity regarding how the returns will be generated or what the investment is used for?
B. Master DataThe three data tables needed in order to put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together are: Goldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestorsGoldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestmentGoldsmith Worldwide Investments PaymentThe primary key to connect them is the Investor ID and the secondary key is the Investment ID.
C. Perform Analysis1. Determine the total investors' funds received.Total investors' funds received = $12,785,0002. Determine total dividends paid to the investors, the number of investors who received dividends, who received the most amount, and what the Mean, Median and Mode are.Total dividends paid to the investors = $0The number of investors who received dividends = 0No one received the most amount.Mean = N/0Median = N/A, as there were no dividends.Mode = N/A, as there were no dividends.
3. Identify business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines = $12,000,000
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has more cash inflows than outflows in every quarter.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. Potential assets for seizure include: Land and buildings Investment portfolio Cash
D. Communication Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments is operating a Ponzi scheme. The company has promised unusually high returns to investors but has failed to deliver. There are no dividends paid to investors, and the business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines is not enough to support the high returns promised. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has been collecting more cash from new investors to pay off existing investors.
As a result, there are potential assets for seizure, including land and buildings, the investment portfolio, and cash.
Learn more about Forensic Accounting here:
https://brainly.com/question/28145069
#SPJ11
What is a major disadvantage to the adversarial system? The judge delays court dates, so there is much expense in holding offenders in jail. There are always more than two sides to a trial. The lawyers have too great a time burden placed on them. Attorneys are often unequal in skills and expense.
Answer:
The right approach is Option B. A further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
Throughout the adversarial system, these are some of the drawbacks of attorneys are that it should be built on 2 different accurately evaluate. The prosecutor and perhaps the prosecutor, whom individual or group this same defendant as well as the complainant, regarding facts provided by both parties whether individuals consider having been important to everyone's particular instance. Perhaps this could even be claimed that seeing who could outmaneuver their rival instead of simply finding the facts appears something of a match.All the other three solutions aren't connected to the situation in question. But the option above is accurate.
Answer:
Attorneys are often unequal in skills and expense
Explanation:
I put the other answer and got it wrong on edg.
should employers have access to any and all information about a potential applicant
Answer:
Federal contractors with affirmative action requirements must collect demographic data on applicants.
Explanation:
so your answer would be yes
is/are NOT a recommended means of communicating with other users of the roadway. A) Lights and signals. B) Angry gestures. C) The horn. D) Eye contact.
The strict scrutiny and the rational basis tests are invoked under
A. The Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
B. The Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
C. The Due Process Clause in the Fifth Amendment.
D. The Free Exercise Clause in the First Amendment.
Answer:
A. The Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
From Brainly
is furniture considered fixed evidence
Answer:
yes
because furniture cannot be easily moved from places to places
what is a attorneys attempt to exclude a juror
Peremptory challenge
Explanation:
Jurors aren't selected, they are not discarded, which is not exactly the same. Jurors are selected from a pool of registered voters, or registered, etc. (the selection pool varies in different states). The process of selecting possible juries is called voire dire, and attorneys have two ways for discarding jurors:
Challenged for cause and discharge: jurors can be discarded based on personal biases or conflicts of interest.
Peremptory challenge: attorney's representing each side may discharge a certain number of jurors without any specific reason at all.
Answer:
Peremptory Challenge is an attorneys secondary attempt to exclude a juror!
Explanation:
Hope it helped♡ :)
Which founding document was the first to clearly declare that 13 sovereign states were united under a single central government?
The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781.
The Articles of Confederation were authorized by way of all 13 states between 1777 and 1781. The Articles of Confederation have 13 sections called articles. This is a short precis of every article. Created the call of the mixed thirteen states as the united states of America.
The colonies knew they wished for a few forms of respectable government that united the 13 colonies. They wanted to have written down policies that all the states agreed to. The Articles allowed Congress to do such things as increase the military, be able to create laws, and print cash.
The announcement of Independence turned into written in 1776. It became a list of grievances in opposition to the king of Britain intended to justify separation from British rule. The constitution changed into written and signed in 1787.
Learn more about Congress here https://brainly.com/question/491441
#SPJ1
People agree about how the government
should spend its money.
true or false ?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Tons of people have different opinions and thats why we have different polictical parties.
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1
Betty takes a listing on Sylvia's home. Without Sylvia's permission, Betty tells a prospective buyer at an open house that Sylvia is desperate to sell within the next 30 days. Betty Broker is
Betty takes a listing on Sylvia's home. Without Sylvia's permission, Betty tells a prospective buyer at an open house that Sylvia is desperate to sell within the next 30 days. Betty Broker is a/an implied agent of the buyer.
Why is Betty Broker is implied agent?In this scenario, Betty is a real estate agent who has taken a listing on Sylvia's home. By making such a statement, Betty has implied that Sylvia may be willing to accept a lower price for her property, which could potentially harm Sylvia's interests as the seller.
Moreover, in making this statement to the prospective buyer, Betty has created an agency relationship with the buyer. Specifically, Betty is acting as an implied agent of the buyer, which means that the buyer may believe that Betty is representing their interests in the transaction. This creates a conflict of interest for Betty, as she has a duty to act in the best interests of her client, Sylvia, but is also potentially representing the buyer's interests as an implied agent.
In summary, Betty's actions in this scenario are a breach of her duty of loyalty to Sylvia, and she has potentially created a conflict of interest by acting as an implied agent of the buyer without Sylvia's permission.
Learn more about implied agent here:https://brainly.com/question/30772046
#SPJ1
According to results from the Monitoring the Future survey, when did drug use among young Americans reach its highest level?
Answer:
1970s
[insert text bc Brainly wants at least 20 characters to “explain my answer well.”]
according to the national institute of corrections what percentage of probation officers (who directly supervise offenders) have been victims of a hazardous incident where their safety was endangered
The National Institute of Corrections (NIC) is a federal agency that provides training and technical assistance to correctional agencies in the United States.
According to the NIC, probation officers who directly supervise offenders are at risk of experiencing "hazardous incidents" that can endanger their safety. However, the NIC does not provide a specific percentage of probation officers who have been victims of such incidents.
Probation officers may be at risk of experiencing hazardous incidents due to the nature of their work, which often involves working with individuals who have a history of criminal behavior. These individuals may be prone to violent outbursts or other dangerous behaviors, and probation officers may be required to deal with them on a regular basis.
Learn more about hazardous incidents
https://brainly.com/question/30418524
#SPJ4
Every day someone complains on how the core system does not work I would like you to suggest three things that you think should be changed to the system why they should be changed and how that part of the system should work
Answer:
It’s been eight years since the Common Core State Standards were unveiled and states began adopting them for use in their evaluation programs. The firestorm of controversy which initially greeted their introduction into American education from both sides of the political aisle seems to have died down somewhat and presently the Common Core appears to have been accepted as a part of the landscape in most of the nation, even as a handful of states that have not adopted it have established similar sets of academic standards.
________ among female inmates is very high
The rate of mental health issues among female inmates is very high.
The rate of mental health issues among female inmates is very high. Many of these women have experienced trauma, abuse, and neglect throughout their lives, which can contribute to mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Additionally, the conditions of incarceration can exacerbate existing mental health issues or create new ones. The lack of access to appropriate mental health care and support can also lead to worsening symptoms and difficulties in reintegrating into society after release. It is important for correctional facilities to prioritize the mental health needs of their female inmates and provide them with access to quality care and support to address their unique challenges and circumstances.
To know more about mental health issues visit: https://brainly.com/question/29023959
#SPJ11