Answers
To address concerns about a client receiving a fair trial due to the current location, an attorney may file a motion for a change of venue.
A change of venue motion asks that the trial be transferred to a different city or state where the lawyer thinks the client will have a better chance of getting a fair trial.
Evidence or arguments that show the potential bias or prejudice in the current setting such as extensive media coverage, community opinion or other elements that might affect the fairness of the proceedings are typically used to support this motion. The motion will be taken into consideration and the court's decision will be based on the case's merits and the interests of justice.
Learn more about fair trial at:
brainly.com/question/15727277
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What is the minimum blood content of a controlled substance that is considered proof of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated in indiana?
Answers
Answer:
I believe it is 0.08
Explanation:
What are the current policies that are regulating the mining industry.
Answers
I am pretty sure these are all. If u need more help lmk
What are the permitted relationships between licensee and consumers as defined by the "Consumer Notice" and Pennsylvania Commission
a. buyer agent, seller agent, designated agent, dual agent and rental agent
b. buyer agent, buyer sub-agent, seller agent, seller sub-gent and dual agent
c. buyer agent, seller agent, designated agent, agent, and transaction licensee
d. buyer agent, seller agent, designated dual agent, and a transaction licensee
Answers
The permitted relationships between licensee and consumers, as defined by the "Consumer Notice" and Pennsylvania Commission, are as follows:
a. buyer agent, seller agent, designated agent, dual agent, and rental agent.
In Pennsylvania, a licensee can act as a buyer agent, representing the interests of the buyer in a real estate transaction. They can also act as a seller agent, representing the interests of the seller. Additionally, a licensee can be designated as an agent by both the buyer and the seller with their informed written consent.
This is known as a designated agent. Dual agency is also permitted, where a licensee represents both the buyer and the seller in the same transaction. Lastly, a licensee can act as a rental agent, helping clients in finding and leasing rental properties.
It is important to note that each role comes with specific responsibilities and obligations to the consumer. Licensees are required to provide written consumer notices to explain their agency relationship and obtain informed consent from the parties involved. This ensures transparency and helps consumers understand the scope and limitations of the licensee's representation.
In summary, the permitted relationships between a licensee and consumers in Pennsylvania include buyer agent, seller agent, designated agent, dual agent, and rental agent. These roles offer different levels of representation and require compliance with specific obligations to protect the interests of the consumers involved in real estate transactions.
Learn more about licensee here: brainly.com/question/28212009
#SPJ11
URGENT 50 POINTS
When deciding whether to refer a juvenile to the courts, law enforcement officers will often consider which factor?
A.
where the juvenile or their parents work
B.
how much money the family has for bail
C.
the likelihood that the juvenile will enter foster care
D.
prior police encounters and seriousness of the delinquency
Answers
Answer:
D. prior police encounters and seriousness of the delinquency
Explanation:
(the others seem a bit bias) please let me know if I am wrong :}
Groups such as the Plug Uglies, the Swamp Angels, the Daybreak Boys, and the Bowery Boys are associated with
Answers
Answer:
pre-twentieth-century, East Coast, urban gangs in the United States
Explanation:
Civil law is further divided into the categories of
Answers
Answer:
it can be divided into two.
substantive law and procedural law
Answer:
substantive law and procedural law
Explanation:
It's 97° and the heat index is 108 a football player who has been laboring is on his last Windsprint and Calass from heat exhaustion the train staff is in the training room and gets to the field eight minutes later and ambulance is done called which arrives 10 minutes later the player later dies in the hospital. what's the rational and the decision?
Answers
Answer:
the rational is that the train staff/coach is responsible they should have been out there watching the football player a number of things could have happened to him, they shouldn't of had him doing football in 97 degree weather but its not given if it was his decision or if he did it on his own time
Explanation:
Distinguish the various methods of intelligence collection.
Answers
The methods of intelligence collection are:
Human Intelligence Signals IntelligenceImagery/Geospatial Intelligence What is intelligence collection ?Intelligence Collection as well as be regarded as the Military Intelligence which is a form of collection that that involves the development of highly-trained workforce.
So that they can collect as well as analyze and perform some evaluation of sensitive military intelligence.
Signals Intelligence which is one of the method of collection involves the collection of foreign intelligence which can be gotten from the communications a well as information systems for instance in the military officials as well as other forms of it.
Read more about intelligence at:
https://brainly.com/question/12774131
#SPJ1
Which of these trial participants is neutral and responsible for keeping the progress of the trial moving forward
Answers
The trial Judge of these trial participants is neutral and responsible for keeping the progress of the trial moving forward. Thus, option D is correct.
What is a trial?A trial is a scheduled appearance in a courtroom when a jury and the judge hear the material and provide a verdict on guilt or innocence.
All experts and some other evidence given either by prosecutors and the defence are heard by the judge. Based on the facts produced and in keeping with the law.
The judge determines whether defendant is culpable or guilty. If the defendant is found guilty, the judge then imposes the punishment. Therefore, option D (Trial judge) is the correct option.
Learn more about the trial, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9676772
#SPJ9
The question is incomplete, the complete question is:
Which of these trial participants is neutral and responsible for keeping the progress of the trial moving forward
prosecutor
victim
family
Trial judge
3. Define blasphemy. Are laws blasphemy laws constitutional? Explain your reasoning.
Answers
Are there any circumstances under which
reporters should be required to reveal or protect their
confidential information or sources?
Answers
Answer:Do reporters have to reveal their sources?
State constitutions and common law. ... Roughly 30 states have passed statutes, called shield laws, allowing journalists to refuse to disclose or testify about confidential or unpublished information, including the identity of sources. The statutes vary significantly from state to state in the scope of their protections.
Explanation:hope this helps
Which of these factors most distinguishes dictators from monarchs?
Answers
Answer:
Monarchs receive their power hereditarily. Dictators are one single person that has authority over an entire nation. A king or queen receives their power through a line of succession, whereas a dictator does not. In a dictatorship, the voices of those who are being dictated are often oppressed. A dictator has total and complete power.
Explanation:
search and seizure laws and self incrimination laws originate
from the 2nd amendment to the constitution
true or false
Answers
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Search and seizure laws and self-incrimination laws do not originate from the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. These legal principles are derived from other provisions within the Constitution and its amendments.
Search and seizure laws primarily stem from the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by the government. The Fourth Amendment establishes requirements for obtaining search warrants, probable cause, and reasonable expectations of privacy.
Self-incrimination laws find their roots in the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees that no person shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves in a criminal case. This protection ensures that individuals have the right to remain silent and avoid self-incrimination during legal proceedings.
The Second Amendment, on the other hand, pertains to the right to bear arms and the regulation of militias. It does not directly relate to search and seizure laws or self-incrimination laws.
Which statement best describes a difference between a democracy and a republic?
Answers
Explain the major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases.
Answers
The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are
"direct influences," which include things like legal and political experiences."indirect and distant impacts," which include things like broad legal and political.What is a Judge?Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.
The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.
Read more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ1
quizlet the city of la mesa has proposed a city ordinance prohibiting all political advertising on bus stop benches. a court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of
Answers
If the city of La Mesa has proposed a city ordinance prohibiting all political advertising on bus stop benches, a court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The First Amendment guarantees the right to freedom of speech, which includes political speech. When reviewing this ordinance, a court would consider whether it violates the freedom of speech rights of individuals or groups who may want to engage in political advertising on bus stop benches. The court would evaluate whether the ordinance serves a compelling government interest and whether it is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. Additionally, the court may consider any previous legal precedents related to similar cases involving political speech restrictions.
Quizlet the city of la mesa has proposed a city ordinance prohibiting all political advertising on bus stop benches. a court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of constitutional law, particularly the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ11
1. In a case involving an ADR clause, the parties to a contract disagreed as to whether the clause required them to submit a dispute over a trade secret problem to arbitration. The clause required the parties to submit “any controversy or claim arising out of the agreement” to arbitration. Strictly speaking, the trade secret controversy did not arise “out of” the agreement; however, it was clear that the trade secret dispute was related to the agreement. The trial court held that the language of the ADR clause was too narrow and that because the trade secret dispute did not arise out of the controversy, the parties were not required to send it to arbitration. Should the appellate court overrule the trial court’s decision rejecting the requirement that the parties arbitrate the trade secret dispute? Explain your response.
Answers
How does the TSA enforce security regulations on
airports? Are there any limits to this enforcement and what are the
penalties for non-compliance?
Answers
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.
The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.
To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562
#SPJ11
What does 273.5 a PC mean?
Answers
it is against the law for a child under what age to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer? 12 21 8 18 submit answer
Answers
It is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.
What is law?The precise definition of law, which is a set of rules created and enforced by social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, has long been debated.It has been described as both a science and an art form. State-enforced laws can be enacted by a group legislature or a single legislator, resulting in statutes; by the executive via decrees and regulations; or by judges via precedent, typically in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals may enter into legally binding contracts, including arbitration agreements that use alternative dispute resolution methods to traditional court litigation. A child under the age of 18 cannot, for example, ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.Therefore, it is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.
Know more about laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
The correct question is given below:
It is against the law for a child under what age to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer?
a. 12
b. 21
c. 8
d. 18
bibi brings a lawsuit against cocteau over an allegedly defective shipment of machine parts. during the trial, bibi’s attorney asks questions of bibi’s witness drummond. this is
Answers
A Direct Examination occurs when Bibi’s attorney asks questions of Bibi’s witness Drummond during the trial.
The party who called the witness to the stand will ask them their first questions during the Direct Examination, while the opposing party (in this case, Cocteau) will ask questions during the Cross-Examination to expose any flaws in the claim of the witness.
For additional information, since Voir Dire is a formal examination specifically designed to ascertain a witness' qualifications as a proposed witness and to ascertain a witness' or juror's competency, when a Bibi's attorney questions Bibi's witness, that is not "to speak the truth" or Voir Dire.
Find out what happens when a lawyer attempt to undermine a witness’s credibility during a portion of the trial: https://brainly.com/question/4710125
#SPJ4
Onyango is employed by Tropical College in Nairobi as a driver while he was transporting some of the college students to the city centre after classes; His attention was diverted when he saw some girls playing netball in a field next to the road. He lost control of the bus which then landed in a ditch and Wafula one of the students aboard was injured. Wafula seeks your advice as to whether he should sue the college or Onyango for damages for negligence. What advice would you give Wafula?
Answers
Answer:
Wafula should sue the college
Explanation:
The college is responsible for keeping the student's safe atleast while they are still in the custody of the school. The college is also responsible for hiring drivers in whose hands the life of the students lies during transport. Therefore based on the narration given, which gives clear evidence showcasing negligence on the path of the driver. In other to forestall future occurence, the college should be sued for their driver's negligence being the employer. The college may decide to come up with more rigorous employment tests when hiring to forestall avoidable mistakes of this sort in the future.
correct way to refer to the south african constitution
Answers
Answer:
Explanation: The Constitution is formally entitled the "Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996." It was previously also numbered as if it were an Act of Parliament—Act No. 108 of 1996—but, since the passage of the Citation of Constitutional Laws Act, neither it nor the acts amending it are allocated act numbers.
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
In my opinion, people should not be prohibited from expressing their opinions under any circumstances, given the individual freedom of each individual to think independently, unless the ideas expressed were totally contrary to the common good (such as expressions that promote terrorism or defending regimes such as Nazism).
In other words, as long as the opinions of individuals do not promote violence or damage to society, they should be allowed, to guarantee the freedom of expression of citizens.
5. Define the following terms.
i.National development
ii.Source water protection
iii.Government
Answers
National development: ecomic development(?)
source water protection: Source Water Protection is a planning process conducted by local water utilities, as well as regional or national government agencies, to protect drinking water sources from overuse and contamination.
government: the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states; direction of the affairs of a state, community, etc.;
Heidi has brought a civil lawsuit against Linda. Linda's lawyer tells her precedent supports her defense. The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous. , Not Selected does not guarantee that Linda will win the case. , Not Selected Incorrect answer: means Linda will win the case. means Heidi's lawsuit is based on statutory law.
Answers
Answer:
The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous.
Explanation:
Precedents in the courts of law are previously established cases whose judgements can be referenced in successive case. In the case above, Linda is the defendant because the burden of proof lies on her. She needs to put up a defense to contest the accuracy of her lawsuit.
When the lawyer tells her that precedent supports her defense, it means that previously established cases on that matter support Linda's case. Therefore, Heidi's lawsuit against Linda was frivolous and lacked merit. Linda has a high chance of winning the case.
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
Answers
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
The net effect of the supreme court decisions in mcculloch v. Maryland and gibbons v. Ogden was.
Answers
Creating a powerful precedent that allowed future national policy to develop free of the constraints of state prerogatives.
What is national policy?In 1876, John A. Macdonald's Conservative Party introduced the National Policy, a Canadian economic agenda. Following the Conservatives' victory in the 1878 Canadian federal election, Macdonald began executing his agenda in 1879.
National policies are the main players in the government process, and they support rural economic development and growth. As a result, numerous types of NGOs and INGOs desire to implement in rural regions and enhance development operations.
Increase birth-age life expectancy from 67.5 to 70 by 2025. Total Fertility Rate (TFR) reduction to 2.1 at the national and sub-national levels by 2025. Reduce child mortality to 23 by 2025.
To know more about national policy follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1064937
#SPJ4
Please dont report. A few kids in my grade said they are gonna jump me. Ive been carrying a knife. What would happen if they attacked me and i defended myself with the knife?
Answers
Answer:
/
Explanation:
I don't think it would be best to have a knife for advice but if they're gonna jump you, you really gotta defend yourself.
Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived ______ distinction.
Answers
Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived in-group/out-group distinction.
What does in-group and out-group refers to?An in-group is a social group that a person mentally identifies with in sociology and social psychology. An out-group, on the other hand, is a social group with which a person does not identify. People may identify, for instance, with their peer group, family, neighborhood, sports team, political party, gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or country. Numerous occurrences have been discovered to be correlated with psychological membership in social groups and categories.
Henri Tajfel and associates developed social identity theory in the 1970s, which led to the widespread use of the concept. A technique known as the minimal group paradigm was used to determine the importance of in-group and out-group classification.
To learn more about in-group and out-group from given link
https://brainly.com/question/7548841
#SPJ4