You are a TV journalist who has been asked to design a debate between two presidential candidates. One is in favor of federalism and the other is against federalism. Your candidates may choose to speak about one of the following: 1) the failures of federalism during Hurricane Katrina; 2) the failures of federalism to pass a balanced budget in 2013; 3) terrorism and how it is fought. Research information about both sides of one of these issues.
Answers
Answer:
We find that some policy failures are related to policy design ... As the most expensive natural disaster in American history and one of the deadliest ... response to Katrina has been cast as a failure of federal initiative and organization ... But coercive federalism is potentially misleading for at least two reasons ...
Explanation:
Related Questions
Which is an example of a draft?
O A. Teller's check
B. Signed contract
C. Certificate of deposit
D. Promissory notes
Answers
Answer:
D, i hope you have a good rest of your day and find out the right answer.
Explanation:
Describe the differences between Civil and Criminal Court.
Answers
Answer:
In a criminal court, a defendant is either acquitted or found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It is the responsibility of the state or federal government to prove that the defendant undoubtedly committed the crime. In a civil court, a plaintiff brings a lawsuit against a defendant
Criminal law deals with behavior that is or can be construed as an offense against the public, society, or the state—even if the immediate victim is an individual. Examples are murder, assault, theft,and drunken driving. Civil law deals with behavior that constitutes an injury to an individual or other private party, such as a corporation. Examples are defamation (including libel and slander), breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.
Explanation:
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST
Assess the roles of the High Court of Australia and the federal parliament in achieving just outcomes in regard to native title.
Answers
The High Court of Australia interprets native title laws and the federal parliament creates and amends these laws to achieve just outcomes for native title holders.
The High Court of Australia plays a crucial role in interpreting and clarifying the native title laws to ensure that native title holders receive just outcomes.
The court has made significant rulings that have clarified the rights and interests of native title holders, including the landmark Mabo decision.
On the other hand, the federal parliament is responsible for creating and amending the native title laws.
This legislative body plays a critical role in ensuring that the laws align with societal values and are just and fair to all parties involved.
Together, the High Court of Australia and the federal parliament work towards achieving just outcomes for native title holders.
For more such questions on federal parliament, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/16380894
#SPJ8
Where can you go to have your will notarized and made legal?
Answers
Where should you start your u-turn on a street with two lanes in each direction? Always in the center left turn lane
In the right lane
In the left lane
Answers
You should always start your u-turn in the center left turn lane, if available. Starting a u-turn from the leftmost through lane can be dangerous as oncoming traffic in the right lane may not expect you to turn across their path. Starting from the right lane also poses risks, as traffic behind you may not expect you to execute a u-turn from that lane.
The recommendations for safe u-turns are:
- Only make u-turns where clearly marked or permitted. Do not make them at intersections without explicit signage.
- Always signal your intention to turn well in advance.
- Check for traffic in all directions, including oncoming traffic in the farthest lane from you.
- Pull into the center left turn lane if available and come to a complete stop to verify traffic has cleared in both directions.
- Execute the turn carefully and smoothly, accelerating through the turn.
- Once completed, re-check for traffic before merging back into the nearest travel lane going your intended direction.
So in summary, the safest place to start a u-turn on a multi-lane street is always in the center left turn lane, if one is available. The key is to be predictable, use proper signaling and verify traffic has cleared in all lanes before executing the turn.
What is required for the establishment of stare decisis as a legal principle?
Answers
ways the government can encourage the youth to actively participate in the democratic process
Answers
A more thorough grasp of what youth engagement entails and how it can be implemented for all young ages is required.
What methods can the government employ to encourage youth participation in the political process?Participation may be increased by involving young people in the design, implementation, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation of tools, strategies, and programs.There are many ways to improve young people's participation, including through education and capacity building.Youth-friendly information and resources can be developed with the aid of conventional and inclusive technology platforms like the internet, SMS, and other such technologies.Those who are young and disabled must be able to use the content.Moreover, procedures and mechanisms can be created to encourage youth participation.These can be developed to institutionalize young people's participation in decision-making processes that affect them, for example, by establishing networks for active civic participation and youth advisory committees.A call for inclusive youth involvement makes the case for greater gender parity and a focus on young women's participation.focusing on involving additional underrepresented youth groups, such as young people with disabilities, those who are indigenous or migrant, young people who have experienced armed conflict and its aftermath, young people who are HIV-positive, etc.While both young men and women are entitled to the same rights, efforts can be made to ensure that youth are fairly represented and included in decision-making bodies.Engage young people in the consultation process to make it easier for them to participate in the creation of laws that affect them. As a result, students will be sure to participate in conversations about how to draft laws and regulations, decide how to distribute resources, and hold the government responsible.It should also be promoted that young people participate in initiatives that address issues that are important to them, including those related to the environment, social protection, reproductive health, and education.Learn more about youth participation: https://brainly.com/question/18336379
#SPJ1
bibliography at least four should be used
Answers
The bibliography appears at the end. The main purpose of a bibliography entry is to give credit to authors whose work you've consulted in your research. It also makes it easy for a reader to find out more about your topic by delving into the research that you used to write your paper.
Whether we are writing an article, a book, a research paper, or a thesis, your bibliography is an essential tool for communicating crucial information to your readers: First, by providing full details of every source you used, you enable your readers to find those books and read them, if they so choose.
A bibliography is a list of books and other source material that you have used in preparing a research paper. Sometimes these lists will include works that you consulted but did not cite specifically in your assignment.
Learn more about bibliography here
https://brainly.com/question/8130130
#SPJ9
Can the crime of assault be committed on someone who is asleep?
Answers
Answer: no because they are unaware of it.
Explanation
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Distinguish between the concepts of governmental crime, state crime, and political white collar crime. Identify as well the special significance of the following concepts: abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal. In what respects are the first set of concepts controversial, and how do they relate to the traditional concept of white collar crime? Why has governmental crime been relatively neglected by criminologists?
Answers
1. Governmental Crime: Governmental crime refers to criminal activities committed by individuals or groups within the government or associated with government functions. This can include illegal actions such as abuse of power, human rights violations, illegal surveillance, and misconduct by government officials.
2. State Crime: State crime involves illegal actions that are perpetrated or sanctioned by the state itself. This includes crimes committed in the pursuit of state policies or interests, such as war crimes, genocide, torture, and state-sponsored terrorism.
3. Political White-Collar Crime: Political white-collar crime refers to illegal activities committed by individuals in positions of political power or influence, often involving financial fraud, bribery, embezzlement, or other forms of corruption. These crimes typically occur in political contexts and involve abuses of power for personal or political gain.
The concepts of abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal have special significance within these contexts:
- Abuse of Power: This refers to the misuse of authority or position for personal or political gain, often involving actions that violate laws, policies, or ethical norms.
- Corruption: Corruption involves the misuse of public power for private gain. It includes actions such as bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and favoritism, which undermine the integrity and fairness of government institutions.
- Bribery: Bribery involves offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value as a means to influence the actions or decisions of a person in a position of power or authority.
- Political Scandal: Political scandals typically involve public exposure and scrutiny of unethical or illegal activities by individuals or groups in the political sphere. These scandals can damage reputations, erode public trust, and have far-reaching political consequences.
The first set of concepts, particularly governmental crime and state crime, can be controversial for several reasons:
1. Lack of Consensus: There may be debates and disagreements over what actions should be considered criminal when committed by governments or states, as the legal framework for defining and prosecuting these offenses can vary across jurisdictions.
2. Sovereign Immunity: Governments and state actors often enjoy certain immunities and legal protections that can make holding them accountable for criminal acts challenging.
3. Political Sensitivity: Investigating and addressing governmental and state crimes can be politically sensitive, as it may involve challenging or questioning the legitimacy and actions of those in power.
These concepts relate to the traditional concept of white-collar crime in that they often involve non-violent offenses committed by individuals in positions of power or influence. However, governmental crime and state crime focus specifically on the actions of government entities or individuals associated with the government, whereas white-collar crime encompasses a broader range of economic and financial offenses committed by individuals in professional or business contexts.
Governmental crime has been relatively neglected by criminologists for various reasons:
1. Focus on Street Crime: Criminology traditionally has had a strong focus on street crime, such as robbery, assault, and drug offenses, while governmental crime has received less attention.
2. Political Factors: Governmental crime involves powerful actors and institutions, making it politically sensitive to investigate and study. This can create obstacles and resistance to research and analysis.
3. Data Availability: Obtaining data on governmental crime can be challenging due to issues of transparency, limited access to official records, and the covert nature of certain crimes.
1. Why do humans put off car maintenance?
O It's inconvenient
O It's expensive
O Our brains think it's a low priority
Answers
Answer:
it is expensive
Explanation:
it is expensive
The power to decide if cases are allowed by the Constitution is called:
O Impeachment
O Judicial Review
O Federalism
O Filibuster
Answers
The constitutional guarantee of a free press has resulted in
A. a government more likely to hide its actions from the people
B. a government more responsive to the needs of the people
C. the establishment of English as the official language of the United States
D. the establishment of government-run news organization
Answers
A government that is more receptive to the needs of the people is the result of the free press provision provided by the constitution.
What is constitution?The American Constitution is considered to be the country's highest law. In 1789, the original constitution of the country, the Articles of Confederation, was replaced. It defines the scope of the country and the limitations on the powers of the executive and legislative branches. The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches, their respective powers, and sets forth the fundamental legislation that governs the United States federal government. The first ten Constitutional Amendments are collectively known as the Bill of Rights. It explains how Americans should interact with their government. Freedom of speech, the press, and religion are just a few of the civil rights and liberties that are guaranteed to the individual.To learn more about constitution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
How to money easily?
Answers
Answer:
Go To Collage Get A Good Job.
Explanation:
Explain what happens to the gravitational force between two objects if
(a) The mass of one object is doubled,
(b) The distance between the object is tripled.
Please its aurgent
Answers
1) As Force is directly proportional to the mass of each object, the force will be doubled.
2) distance is doubled, Force will become 1/4th as Force is inversely proportional to the square of distance.
d is tripled. Force will become 1/9th as force is inversely proportional to the square of distance
19. Who was an important leader in the women's suffrage movement? (1 point)
Answers
Answer:
Susan B. Anthony, Alice Paul, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone and Ida B. Wells
What happens if a state ratifies an amendment after the time frame for it to be ratified passes?
Answers
An original or certified copy of the State action that ratifies a proposed amendment is sent to the Archivist, who then immediately notifies the Director of the Federal Register.
Briefing:-Ratification documents are examined by the OFR to ensure that they are facially valid and have an authenticating signature.
Does the process of ratifying modifications have a deadline?The United States Constitution does not set a deadline for ratifying constitutional changes. In actuality, the 27th Amendment to the Constitution, which forbade instant pay raises for members of Congress, was ratified 203 years after it was first proposed.
Can an amendment be later accepted if a State rejects it?When authorized, it cannot be revoked; it is final approval. Yet, an amendment may be revoked if it turns out to be incorrect later.
To Know more about Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
1–4. Spotlight on AOL—Common Law. AOL, LLC, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. The members filed a suit, alleging violations of California law. AOL asked the court to dismiss the suit on the basis of a "forum-selection clause" in its member agreement that designates Virginia courts as the place where member disputes will be tried. Under a decision of the United States Supreme Court, a forum-selection clause is unenforceable "if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought." California courts have declared in other cases that the AOL clause contravenes a strong public policy. If the court applies the doctrine of stare decisis, will it dismiss the suit?
Answers
Answer:
If the court applies the Stare decisis doctrine, the case will not be dismissed.
Explanation:
The stare decisis doctrine will provide the necessary legal bases for the case to proceed within California. This will happen because there is a legal decision applied throughout the national territory that states that this type of clause, which presents a selection forum, is inexorable. This happens because the AOL clause violated, in fact, a very strong public policy, so the judges are obliged to continue with the case, within the state where the public policy was violated.
A federal statute designed to stop organized crime enumerated certain activities as crimes and provided that, in addition to charging these activities as the crimes they constitute, the activities would also constitute the criminal act of intentional furtherance of the goals of organized crime. Among the enumerated activities was the interstate distribution of cocaine. The statute’s constitutionality has been upheld by the Supreme Court. The defendant was arrested by federal agents after having driven a truck containing cocaine from Florida to Illinois, where he delivered his illicit cargo as directed. At trial, the defendant is convicted of interstate distribution of cocaine in violation of federal law, and convicted of a violation of the federal statute above. How may the defendant be sentenced?
Answers
Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.
What is the only situation where you can safely push a pedal with your left foot?
A. if the driver has a cramp in their right foot
B. if the car is an electric vehicle
C. if the car has a clutch
D. if the roads are icy
Answers
Answer:
im going with A
Explanation:
Left-foot braking has long been one of the most hotly contested topics in driving. Detractors claim it makes no difference at best, and is a horrible and dangerous practice at worst. However, you can stop 70ft faster in an emergency situation if you use your left foot properly (more on that number in a second).
The only situation when the individual can safely push a pedal with their left foot is if the driver has a cramp in his right foot.
One of the most contentious aspects of driving has long been left-foot braking. Detractors argue that it makes no difference at best and that at worst, it is a horrible and dangerous practice. In an emergency, however, if you use your left foot properly, you can stop 70 feet faster.
Therefore the correct option is A.
To know more about the situation when an individual can push the pedal with the left foot, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/546440
Naomi was convicted of assault after an argument with her housekeeper. The judge ordered that she spend 20 hours working on a crew picking up trash along the side of a busy highway. What is this punishment called?
probation
house arrest
restitution
community service
Answers
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
Answers
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
1. which aspect of Rule of Law Duplessis violated.
Answers
Answer:
The Supreme Court held that Premier Duplessis' cancellation of Roncarelli's liquor licence violated the Rule of Law because this action constituted an abuse of the Premier's powerful position.
Explanation:
Ur welcome
Do you believe that anyone is able to murder in the right situation at the right time like if you daughter was about to be murdered but the only way to stop them is to murder them would you do it
Answers
Answer:
I would not murder them bc that will be a sin
Explanation:
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ..
Answers
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ask for help, go for rehabilitation or report yourself to the authority.
What is the issue of drinking and driving about?Alcohol has an impact on the areas of your brain that manage your skill and judgment. The more alcohol you consume, the worse you get at things.
Drinking and driving may seem like a good idea when you're intoxicated, but even small amounts of alcohol can affect your reaction times and cause double or blurred vision, which puts you in danger when operating a vehicle. You run the danger of causing an accident while intoxicated, leaving you with a totaled vehicle and a large insurance claim.
Learn more about drinking and driving from
https://brainly.com/question/1173942
#SPJ1
Which statement best describes a scientific law?
O A. It explains why certain events occur.
O B. It describes what happens under a set of conditions.
O C. It is a statement of opinion made by a scientist.
OD. It is a rule agreed upon by all scientists.
Answers
What issues does article 1 of the constitution deal with
Answers
1. Section 1: Legislative Powers: This section vests all legislative powers of the federal government in Congress, comprising the House of Representatives and the Senate.
2. Section 2: House of Representatives: This section defines the qualifications and responsibilities of members of the House of Representatives, including the process of election, the apportionment of representatives based on population, and the authority to initiate revenue-related bills.
3. Section 3: The Senate: This section outlines the qualifications and responsibilities of senators, including the process of election and the equal representation of states in the Senate.
4. Section 4: Elections and Meetings: This section grants the states the power to establish the times, places, and manner of congressional elections, while also requiring Congress to meet at least once a year.
5. Section 5: Rules and Procedures: This section grants each chamber of Congress the power to determine its rules, procedures, and discipline for its members.
6. Section 6: Compensation and Privileges: This section establishes the compensation and privileges of members of Congress, including protection from arrest while attending sessions and freedom of speech.
7. Section 7: Legislative Process: This section outlines the process for passing bills into law, including the requirement of bicameral approval and the presidential veto power.
8. Section 8: Powers of Congress: This section enumerates the specific powers of Congress, including the power to collect taxes, regulate commerce, coin money, establish post offices, declare war, and make laws necessary and proper for carrying out its responsibilities.
9. Section 9: Limits on Congress: This section imposes certain limitations on the powers of Congress, such as prohibiting the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the enactment of ex post facto laws.
10. Section 10: Limits on States: This section outlines the restrictions placed on the states, including their ability to enter into treaties, coin money, or engage in war without the consent of Congress.
Overall, Article 1 establishes the structure and authority of the legislative branch, defining its powers, responsibilities, and limitations within the framework of the U.S. government.
Answer:
Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has.
What might a national fingerprint database not meet current law enforcement needs and be considered outdated?
Answers
Answer:
this is your answer....
A ____ is the term for any driving maneuver in which you need to turn your car around.
Answers
Answer:
Turnabout.
Explanation:
A turnabout is a word that refers to an act of turning or making a complete U-turn. It usually refers to the act of changing one's decisions completely to the opposite.
In driving maneuvers, the term "turnabout" is used to refer to the need to turn the car around. This can be done by stopping the car, pulls and gets into the other side of the road, turns back, and then move forward to the opposite direction and into the direction it wants to go.
The first time you refuse to submit to a breath, urine, or blood
test, your license will be suspended for
Answers
Answer:
Your license will be suspended for one or two years.
Explanation:
The driver stopped at a police blitz or who engages In an accident may refuse to perform the breath, urine or blood test, but is not free of punishment: He will receive the same treatment given to the driver who was caught driving over substance effect.
Among the punishments, the driver may have the license suspended for one or two years, be required to participate in a DUI education program for nine months and pay a fine.