XYZ, Inc. wishes to make an election to become an S corporation for federal tax purposes. Which of the following statements regarding the election is false?
A. All of the corporation's shareholders must consent to make an S election.
B. If a shareholder in an S corporation sells his shares of stock to a nonresident alien, the election will terminate.
C. If an S corporation loses its election, the shareholders cannot make a new election for five years without IRS consent.
D. All of the shareholders must consent to voluntarily terminating an S election.
Answers
The one claim that is untrue is that, in terms of federal income tax law, S companies are similar to partnerships.
The marriage penalty for federal income tax purposes applies in which of the following scenarios?If a pair pays more income tax as a married couple than they would as single people, this is known as a "marriage penalty." In contrast, if the partners pay less income tax as a married couple than they would as singletons, the couple is given a "marriage bonus".
Which of the following must be true in order to qualify as a S corporation?The company must be a corporation and satisfy the following criteria in order to be eligible for S-Corporation status: Geography - Organized in the United States. All shareholders must be US citizens or legal permanent residents. There can be no more than 100 stockholders in the company.
How are S corporations taxed?The IRS taxes S companies as pass-through organizations. The S corporation does not pay federal income tax on its business income the same way a C corporation does due to pass-through taxation.
Know more about election:
brainly.com/question/3710013
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Which of the following is included in the four quadrants of ethical and legal behavior?
a. Legal behavior and ethical behavior
b. Illegal behavior and ethical behavior
c. Legal behavior and unethical behavior
d. All of the above
Answers
The four quadrants of ethical and legal behavior include legal behavior and ethical behavior, illegal behavior and ethical behavior, and legal behavior and unethical activity. Hence, option d.) All of the above is correct.
Legal and ethical behavior is frequently misconstrued, in part because they frequently overlap. But there are distinctions between moral action and legal behavior. Debating whether you should buy a yacht or donate to a charity, for example, is not a legal matter, but it may be an ethical one.
Legal and ethical violations can have serious ramifications for a company: legal violations can lead to fines and, depending on how serious they are, the jail of the perpetrators; ethical violations can lead to a loss of trust from clients and business partners.
To learn more about Legal and ethical behavior, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/21384955
#SPJ4
Who is the commander in chief of the
U.S. military forces?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The question has been raised as to whether the President is Commander in Chief of the Air Force established as a separate branch of the National Military? It is clear that the President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of the United States comprised within the national military establishment—the Air. Force as well as the Army and the Navy. Under the Constitution, the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy is the supreme military commander charged with the responsibility of protecting and defending the United States. The phrase “Army and Navy” is used in the Constitution as a means of describing all the armed forces of the United States. The fact that one branch of the armed forces is called the “Air Force,” a name not known when the Constitution was adopted, and the fact that the Congress has seen fit to separate the air arm of our armed forces from the land and sea arms cannot detract from the President’s authority as
Commander in Chief of all the armed forces : HAROLD I. BAYNTON
Acting Assistant to the Attorney General
Create a short story that includes the following vocabulary words. Make sure it relates to criminology and don’t just give the definition of the term.
• General deterrence
• Incapacitation
• Probable cause
• Plea bargain
Answers
The police arrived at the robbers' hideout and used probable cause to search for evidence of their crimes. They found stolen goods, tools for breaking and entering, and a whole lot of cash. The robbers were arrested and taken to trial, where they were offered a plea bargain. They could either spend years in jail or agree to pay restitution to the victims and promise to never steal again.
The robbers thought for a moment before agreeing to the plea bargain. "We don't want to spend our prime criminal years behind bars," they said. "We'll just go into early retirement and become honest business people." The judge accepted the plea bargain and sentenced them to community service and financial restitution. General deterrence was achieved as the town became less attractive to other aspiring entrepreneurs who would like to do some redistributing of their own. Incapacitation was achieved too, as the robbers were now too busy running a lemonade stand to rob anyone else.
samantha was affluent and gave $6,000 to each of 1,000 needy individuals. someone told her that under the uniform estate and gift tax, she would have to pay a tax. were they correct?
Answers
Yes, the person who told Samantha about the uniform estate and gift tax was correct.
The uniform estate and gift tax is a federal tax on gifts and estates, and it applies to gifts of money or property that exceed a certain amount. In 2021, the annual gift tax exclusion is $15,000 per person, meaning that Samantha's gift of $6,000 to each of 1,000 individuals would exceed this amount and would therefore be subject to the gift tax. However, there are various exemptions and deductions available under the tax code, so it's possible that Samantha could minimize or eliminate her tax liability by working with a tax professional.
To know more about tax, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12611692
#SPJ11
Making a legal arrest, gaining information for warrants, or even preventing crime can all be the result of:
a.
entrapment.
b.
surveillance.
c.
pretextual traffic stops.
d.
criminal profiling.
Answers
What is the difference between a crime and a war crime?
Answers
can you all helping me
Answers
Answer:
5. Homicide. X assaulted Y, causing them to fall into the water and drown. This is homicide, even if unintentional.
6. Yes. B is an accessory to murdxr/raxe. It's called "accomplice liability."
NOTE: This is going to vary by region. I am also not a lawyer.
Evaluate how community respond to women and children in light of the human Rights Violations
Answers
Answer:
Human rights violations against women and children are unfortunately prevalent in many communities around the world. The response of the community can vary depending on a range of factors, such as cultural norms, legal protections, and social attitudes.
In some cases, communities may rally together to support women and children who have experienced human rights violations. This may involve setting up support networks, providing counseling services, or advocating for legal and policy changes to prevent future abuses. Such responses can be vital in ensuring that survivors of human rights violations are able to access the resources and support to recover and manage their lives.
In other cases, communities may stigmatize and ostracize women and children who have experienced human rights violations. They may blame them for their own victimization and perpetuating harmful cultural attitudes that contribute to ongoing abuse. This can make it difficult for survivors to come forward and seek help and can further entrench cycles of violence and exploitation.
Ultimately, the response of the community to human rights violations against women and children depends on a complex interplay of factors.The main factors include cultural, social, and economic conditions, as well as legal and policy frameworks. To promote ethical practices and prevent human rights violations, communities should work together to address the root causes of such abuses. They should create a culture of respect and dignity for all individuals regardless of their gender or age.
Explanation:
Interoperability training and statutory authority are two exception that allow the odd to conduct what type of activity
Answers
The four given things required for foreign assistance agreements are the Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA).
What is Interagency support?
When the military service provides support to logistics or administration with more than two departments government of the United States is referred to as Interagency support.
Sometimes military officers find it difficult to cope with this system of government which is well known for the flexibility it offers.
The U.S. Department of Defense is empowered to directly obtain products, services, equipment, and training from and to other countries that are authorized according to contractual procedures called acquisition and cross-servicing agreements.
The interagency process facilitates Unity of Effort by military and non-military participants conducting interagency coordination in pursuit of national objectives.
A military's reluctance to use force may prevent it from taking part in interagency decision-making.
As a result, before the special capabilities of the Armed Forces receive serious consideration, other national power instruments may be exhausted, and only then with a profound sense of having failed to use other means.
The interagency process can be a powerful force multiplier, especially when military planners are involved throughout, but it has flaws in its organization, actors, and methodology.
Military officers who are used to a rigid and rigorous system of staff work may find it difficult to cooperate with government institutions recognized for their flexibility and ambivalence.
But in order to improve the interagency process, the military should continue to be involved.
The relevance of the interagency process at the strategic level to the Combatant Commande and the U.S. military is that the process yields Americas national security policy decision. Strategy is one of the most impotant aspects fo security policy as it determines logistic and the besst plans of action.
What type of professional could BEST help the relationship between the police and the citizens ?
a) a forensic anthropologist
b) a forensic pathologist
c) a forensic sociologist
d) a forensic sociologist
Answers
Answer:
C a forensic sociologist
Explanation:
they talk to the police and the citizens.
The best profession, which helps in building the relationship between the police and the citizens is a forensic sociologist. Hence, Option D is correct.
Who is a forensic sociologist?Being a forensic sociologist, an individual will be engaged in the activity of analyzing the shreds of evidence and also keeps the research that is related to criminal cases or civil cases.
It is the duty of the forensic sociologist to make sure that not a single piece of evidence will be neglected during the whole investigation. For keeping a track of all the things, forensic sociologists maintain the relationship between the police and the citizens.
Sometimes people often get confused between forensic sociology and criminology. They both are having different sciences. Forensic sociology is an applied science. On the other hand, criminology is a specialized social science.
Thus, Option D is correct.
Learn more about forensic from here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Your testing policies are not meant to discriminate against women, but
women pass your tests at significantly lower rates than men. The test you
are giving has not been professionally developed...indeed, you thought of
random "feats of strength" and not about the particular job at all. Because
you do not intend to discriminate against women, or any other protected
group, there are no employment discrimination claims that can be brought
against you.
True or false.
Answers
Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.
When can discrimination suits be brought?As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.
Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.
The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.
Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ1
Name two main reasons people chose to come to the American colonies.
A, to benefit from the colonies’ long summers and short winters
B.
to benefit from the colonies’ short summers and long winters
C.
to escape political unrest and a poor climate in England
D.
to seek religious freedom and economic opportunity
Answers
Answer:
it would be A and D
Explanation:
Well the truth is back in the day that's what people wanted to do.
Taking driver education course is the first step in what we hope will be
Answers
Taking this driver education course is the first step in what we hope will be D. A Lifetime of safe driving.
What is a driver education course?The driver education course can be described as the course that can be taken so as to educate those that do drive on the road about their sdafety as well as the safety of all other users on the road.
It should be noted that the course do help to sanitize the road because it will help the drivers to know more about how the road will be used in term of the saftey as well as all road signs that is needed to be known.
Learn more about education at:
https://brainly.com/question/25887038
#SPJ1
complete question;
Taking this driver education course is the first step in what we hope will be ___.
A. A two-step process
B. Several years of safe driving
C.A lifetime of studying
D. A Lifetime of safe driving
In 1971, the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's) _____ program required advertisers to have supporting documentation for their claims and to prove the claims are truthful.
A. Central Hudson
B. Lanham
C. cease-and-desist
D. advertising substantiation
E. affirmative disclosure
Answers
In 1971, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) introduced the advertising substantiation program, which required advertisers to have supporting documentation for their claims and to prove the claims are truthful.
The program was established to prevent deceptive advertising and to ensure that advertisements provide accurate information to consumers. Under the program, the FTC has the authority to request evidence from advertisers to support their claims, and advertisers who fail to provide sufficient evidence can face legal action. The advertising substantiation program has been instrumental in protecting consumers from false or misleading advertising, and it continues to be a key component of the FTC's efforts to regulate the advertising industry.
To know more about Federal Trade Commission (FTC) click here:
brainly.com/question/30692508
#SPJ4
Agency in Arizona is created
A) exclusively as the result of a signed employment agreement
B) when a principal has delegated authority, and a salesperson or broker accepts it.
C) between a brokerage and licensees employed by an employing broker.
D) when in accordance with the Statute of Frauds.
Answers
The correct answer is C) between a brokerage and licensees employed by an employing broker.
In Arizona, the creation of agency is primarily governed by the Arizona Department of Real Estate and the Arizona Revised Statutes related to real estate brokerage. According to these regulations, agency relationships are established between a brokerage firm and the individual licensees who are employed by an employing broker.
When a licensee becomes affiliated with a brokerage, they enter into an employment agreement with the broker, which outlines the terms and conditions of their association. This agreement establishes the agency relationship between the brokerage and the licensee. The licensee agrees to work under the supervision and direction of the employing broker and to adhere to the brokerage's policies and procedures.
The agency relationship created in this context is known as a "brokerage agency" or "employment agency" relationship. It defines the legal responsibilities and obligations of the licensee towards the brokerage and its clients. The licensee acts as the agent of the brokerage and represents the brokerage's interests in real estate transactions.
It's important to note that the creation of agency in Arizona is not exclusively dependent on a signed employment agreement or the Statute of Frauds. While an employment agreement may be required for clarity and documentation purposes, the agency relationship is primarily formed when a licensee is employed by an employing broker and agrees to act as the broker's representative in real estate transactions.
In summary, agency in Arizona is created between a brokerage and licensees employed by an employing broker. The employment agreement solidifies this agency relationship, and licensees act as agents of the brokerage in real estate transactions.
for more questions on brokerage
https://brainly.com/question/30161110
#SPJ8
Briefly explain why the following contracts are void or unenforceable.
Q.1.1 Tina verbally agrees to stand surety for James’ student loan from ZA Bank
Answers
The reason why this contract is going to be void or unenforceable is because there is no proof of agreement.
An enforceable contract is a contract that can be enforced in the court of law. It shows that an arrangement has been reached by two or more persons.
Tina has agreed to be a surety verbally. This cannot be enforced, it can only be enforced through signing and the presence of a document showing that she agrees to be a surety.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/18418156?referrer=searchResults
On 5 August, X sends a written offer by post to Y, to purchase Y’s ROLEX watch for R20000 (twenty thousand rand). One of the terms in the offer is that the offer will lapse on 20 August. In response to this offer, Y writes her letter of acceptance and posts it to X on 15 August. On 17 August Y changes her mind and decides that she no longer wants to sell the ROLEX watch as it is a limited edition. Y then calls X by telephone on 18 August and informs X that she (Y) is withdrawing her acceptance and that her postal acceptance should be ignored. On 21 August X receives Y’s written acceptance that was sent by post. X seeks your advice on whether a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y. Discuss and substantiate fully.
Answers
Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
What is a Contract?This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Research indicates a variety of facts about murder. Which of the following is inaccurate?A) Over 40 percent of murders in which the attacker can be identified involved an intimate partner.B) Murder tends to be an interaracial crimeC) Most murders occur among people who are acquainted.D) Females 65 or older are more likely than males of the same age to be homicide victims.
Answers
The inaccurate statement among the options provided is B) Murder tends to be an interracial crime.
Research and statistics consistently show that the majority of murders tend to occur within racial groups, rather than between them. In other words, most murders involve victims and perpetrators of the same race. This pattern holds true across various jurisdictions and countries.
Interracial murders are relatively rare compared to intra racial murders. Studies have consistently found that the overwhelming majority of homicides are committed by individuals of the same race as the victim. This is often attributed to the fact that social interactions and conflicts primarily occur within racial or ethnic groups.
It is important to rely on accurate information when discussing crime and understanding its dynamics. The accurate understanding that emerges from research and statistical analysis is that murder tends to be an intra racial crime, meaning it is more commonly perpetrated within racial groups rather than between them.
Learn more about murder here : brainly.com/question/4182900
#SPJ11
What happens after the U.S. Supreme Court justices discuss and vote on the
case?
O A. Both parties make oral arguments to the Court.
B. The justices share their written opinions on the case.
C. Both parties petition for a writ of certiorari.
D. The justices agree to review the case.
Answers
Answer: B. The justices share their written opinions on the case.
Explanation:
When the time comes for the Justices to decide on the case, they will discuss it by stating their opinions on the case in descending order first from the Chief Justice and then from the most senior Justice to the least.
They will then vote on the case and then the Chief Justice or the most senior Justice on the majority side of the case will assign a justice to write the opinion of the court. The dissenting side can also do the same.
The case: Sixteen-year-old Terry was in a bedroom at his family's home with his younger brother when he pulled a handgun from underneath the mattress. Terry was allegedly pointing the gun at his brother when it fired. The bullet struck his brother, killing him. Terry had gotten the .380-caliber semi-automatic handgun by trading a 9mm Glock he had stolen from his father. The police say they believe the shooting was not intentional.
Answers
Answer: Involuntary Manslaughter
Explanation:
It is believed that Terry did not intentionally commit a crime. Intent would have resulted in a murder case. Murder, whether or not it is premeditated or unpremeditated, is intentional. The difference with manslaughter is that: voluntary manslaughter, while requiring intent, also involves a circumstance in which a reasonable person becomes emotionally disturbed and fueled by passion or impulse rather than judgement. Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that results from criminal negligence or recklessness. (no intent or heat of passion).
Elements of crime committed:
Actus Reus and the element of harm come into play with Terry's case. Because there wasn't causation for his brother's death, the intent element isn't present. Terry has no guilty state of mind.
what type of crime is selling alcohol after hours (after 2:00 am)?
Answers
Selling alcohol after hours (after 2:00 am) is typically considered a violation of liquor licensing laws.
What category of violation does selling alcohol after hours fall into?Selling alcohol after hours, commonly after 2:00 am, is generally regarded as a violation of liquor licensing laws. These laws govern the sale, distribution, and consumption of alcohol within a specific jurisdiction and typically include regulations on operating hours for establishments that serve alcohol. Selling alcohol outside of the permitted hours is often seen as a breach of these regulations and may result in penalties or consequences for the establishment or individual involved. The specific penalties and enforcement mechanisms can vary depending on local laws and regulations.
Learn more about Selling alcohol
brainly.com/question/30846841
#SPJ11
Companies who manufacture safes are always looking to improve their design. Their customers count on them to provide technology that is impossible to hack so that whatever is stored inside their safes is unreachable to a thief. There are those who are always examining the new technology to try to find a way in. A person who specializes in unlocking expensive safes for a living would be most likely classified as a:.
Answers
In the situation given above, it can be stated that a person who specializes in unlocking expensive safes for a living would be most likely classified as a professional thief.
A thief can be referred to or considered as a professional who is involved in making money for living through the primary job of stealing money and things, having money's worth, as such. The daily activities of a professional thief might include unlocking expensive safes for a living. It is an illegal profession, and highly punishable under the constitution.
Learn more about a thief here:
https://brainly.com/question/28786322
#SPJ4
Always unload a firearm before:
Answers
Answer:
Storage, cleaning and travel
Explanation:
took a course
How does resistance to change affect employees in law enforcement?
Answers
Changes in organizational structure typically have an effect on the police officers that work there, and this interdependence is crucial for the outcome that the police organization will reach, as well as the level of security of the public and other protected values.
What do you mean by the resistance to change?The refusal to adapt to change when it is presented is known as resistance to change. Employee resistance to organisational change can take two forms: overt and covert.
This can take the form of openly expressing opposition or unintentionally opposing change through language or general behavior.
Although there are various causes for resistance, the main one is dread of the unknown. Since people are physically programmed to seek for patterns and predictability, even anticipated or good unpredictability can cause anxiety.
Missed meetings, snarky comments, criticism, nitpicking, and even sabotage are a few examples.
Therefore, Changes in organizational structure typically have an effect on the police officers that work there, and this interdependence is crucial for the outcome that the police organization will reach, as well as the level of security of the public and other protected values.
To know more about the resistance to change, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28028785
#SPJ5
other things equal, the fundamental characteristic of the law of
Answers
Other things equal, the fundamental characteristic of the law of demand is that the quantity demanded of a good decreases as the price of the good increases.
This is because, as the price of a good increases, consumers have less money to spend on other goods, so they will demand less of the good.
For example, if the price of a gallon of milk increases from $2 to $3, consumers will likely buy less milk, and instead spend their money on other goods, such as bread or eggs.
The law of demand is a fundamental economic principle that is used to explain the relationship between price and quantity demanded. It is one of the most important laws in economics, and it is used to make predictions about how markets will behave.
There are a number of factors that can affect the demand for a good, in addition to price. These factors include income, tastes, expectations, and the number of buyers in the market.
However, the law of demand states that, other things equal, a decrease in price will lead to an increase in quantity demanded, and an increase in price will lead to a decrease in quantity demanded.
To know more about law of demand, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32463907#
#SPJ11
Successfulness of the competition policy in South Africa
Answers
Answer:
The product choices along with its competitive prices were provided to the consumers.
Explanation:
should chase be able to enforce the waiver clause (under ucc 9-403), prohibiting burning lake tire from raising defenses against chase?
Answers
Under UCC 9-403, a party who has waived a right or defense may still assert it if the waiver was not intended to be binding or if the other party had no knowledge of the waiver.
Therefore, whether Chase can enforce the waiver clause prohibiting Burning Lake Tire from raising defenses against Chase will depend on whether Chase's waiver was intended to be binding and whether Burning Lake Tire had knowledge of the waiver.
If Chase's waiver was clearly communicated to Burning Lake Tire and Burning Lake Tire had knowledge of the waiver, then Chase may be able to enforce the waiver clause and prohibit Burning Lake Tire from raising defenses against Chase. However, if Burning Lake Tire did not have knowledge of the waiver or if the waiver was not intended to be binding, then Chase may not be able to enforce the waiver clause.
It is important to consult with a licensed attorney who is familiar with UCC 9-403 and the specific facts and circumstances of your case to determine whether Chase can enforce the waiver clause prohibiting Burning Lake Tire from raising defenses against Chase.
Learn more about UCC visit :brainly.com/question/20235251
#SPJ11
The Rio Treaty of 1947 was a defense agreement between
O the United States and Brazil.
O the United States and Japan.
O North America and South America.
O the nations that border the Atlantic Ocean.
Answers
The purpose of the Rio Treaty of 1947 was to act as a defense agreement between North America and South America.
What was the Rio Treaty?This was an agreement between the United States and several countries in South America.
The purpose of this was to form a defense alliance during the Cold War that would protect member states from attacks by nonmembers.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on the Cold War at https://brainly.com/question/856013.
Answer:The purpose of the Rio Treaty of 1947 was to act as a defense agreement between North America and South America.
What was the Rio Treaty?
This was an agreement between the United States and several countries in South America.
The purpose of this was to form a defense alliance during the Cold War that would protect member states from attacks by nonmembers.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on the Cold War at brainly.com/question/856013.
Which of the following would satisfy the 30 minute break required under the interruption of driving provisions
Answers
The 30-minute break might be met by: Taking 30 straight hours off or on the job without using a vehicle. thirty minutes in the sleeping bunk nonstop. 30 continuous minutes are equal to both put together.
A driver has a window of 8 hours to drive following their most recent time of at least 30 minutes off-duty, in accordance with the FMCSA's 30-Minute Break Rule. A driver was required to take a 30-minute break by the eighth hour after starting their shift in order to resume driving under the previous regulation. A motorist is obligated to take a 30-minute break after 8 hours of continuous driving without a break of at least 30 minutes. Any 30-minute stretch without driving would suffice as a break.
Unless you meet the requirements for an exception, the 30-minute break rule must be followed. For instance, all short-haul drivers and non-CDL drivers operating within a 150 air-mile radius of their starting point are excluded from the requirement.
Learn more about the 30-minute breaks:
https://brainly.com/question/23580537
#SPJ9
which of the following is a correct description or assumption of pluralism as a theory that explains interest groups as group politics?
Answers
Which of the following is an assumption of pluralism?
A. Only wealthy interests have influence over government decisions.
B. Government decisions reflect the preferences of elites.
C. Interest groups are integral to government decisions.
D. Policy makers care more about public opinion than interest groups' preferences.
E. Political parties matter more than interest groups in shaping government policies.
The correct answer is option C, the correct assumption of pluralism is Government choices are heavily influenced by interest groups.
The idea that political and decision-making processes take place inside the framework of the government but that non-governmental organizations can still have an impact is known as classical pluralism. The distribution of influence and authority within the political system is the key issue for traditional pluralism.
According to pluralism, disputes frequently arise when different groups of people attempt to maximize their own interests, and the shifting of power is effective in negotiating power between different interest groups.
According to pluralists, there would still be inequities, but these would be leveled by the allocation of resources among a population. They favor an electoral system with a minimum of two parties, as well as freedom of association and religion.
To learn more about pluralism please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14929497
#SPJ4