I would prefer a lifetime on probation for several reasons such as :
Reduced stigma Increased flexibility Why do some prefer probation to prison ?Probation allows individuals to remain in the community rather than being incarcerated in a correctional facility, which can be stigmatizing and isolating.
Probation allows for more flexibility than imprisonment, allowing individuals to maintain some control over their daily lives. Probation is generally less expensive than incarceration, which can be a factor for individuals who are concerned about the financial impact of a prison sentence.
Find out more on probation at https://brainly.com/question/9567331
#SPJ1
Identify the three parts of the U.S. Constitution and explain the purpose of each part.
please Help
The Preamble, seven articles, and amendments make up the Constitution's three main sections. The Preamble provides justification for the Constitution's creation as well as a list of its main objectives.
Through a system of checks and balances between the three branches, it first establishes a national government with a legislative, executive, and judicial branches. It also divides authority between the states and the federal government. Third, it safeguards the diverse personal freedoms of American citizens.
A country's constitution aids in providing a set of guidelines and precepts that all citizens may accept as the foundation for how they want the nation to be run. They all agree on a particular set of ideas that they believe the nation should uphold, as well as the style of government.
To know more about U.S. Constitution visit
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
What was one disadvantage of the first police radio service? ( It was NOT 1..... )
1. The signal was only carried about 300 ft.
2. It carried too many commercials.
3. It was so popular that everyone in the city tuned in to listen and it soon became ineffective.
4. It was one way communication; officers could not respond to the radio message.
The disadvantage of the first police radio service was It was one way communication; officers could not respond to the radio message. The correct answer is option 4.
What is police radio service.Police radio is a radio system used by police and other law enforcement agencies to communicate with one another. Police radio systems almost always use two-way radio systems to allow for communications between police officers and dispatchers.
Learn more about Police Radio here
https://brainly.com/question/2794245
#SPJ1
One disadvantage of the first police radio service was that the signal was only carried about 300 ft. The Option 1 is correct.
What was the history of first police radio service?In 1928, the Detroit Police Department set up a one-way radio system to broadcast crime information to police cars, which was the first police radio system. The Federal Communications Commission assigned the call sign "KOP" to the frequency.
Early police radio systems, however, were only used in police cars and buildings due to their high cost and size; officers on foot patrol had to rely on telephones and call boxes. Portable radios, which were introduced in the 1960s, made radio communications available to all officers. Early portable radios were bulky and had short battery lives, which gradually faded as technology advanced.
Read more about police radio
brainly.com/question/2794245
#SPJ1
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ..
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ask for help, go for rehabilitation or report yourself to the authority.
What is the issue of drinking and driving about?Alcohol has an impact on the areas of your brain that manage your skill and judgment. The more alcohol you consume, the worse you get at things.
Drinking and driving may seem like a good idea when you're intoxicated, but even small amounts of alcohol can affect your reaction times and cause double or blurred vision, which puts you in danger when operating a vehicle. You run the danger of causing an accident while intoxicated, leaving you with a totaled vehicle and a large insurance claim.
Learn more about drinking and driving from
https://brainly.com/question/1173942
#SPJ1
the law of demands is explained by all of the following except?
A. consumer preferences
B. income effect
C. law of diminishing marginal utility
D. substitution effect
Answer:
C. law of diminishing marginal utility
Explanation:
If not? Which one was it?
Answer:c
Explanation:
What was the group who assisted in Mapp’s appeal?
French Francois Emanuel Fodéré wrote one of the earliest scientific treatises on
forensic science titled A Treatise on Forensic Medicine and ___________.
Francois Emanuel Fodere wrote the treatise titled a treatise on Forensic Medicine and Public Health.
Francoise was from France. He was a French forensic physician. He made ground breaking achievements in the use of science to enforce criminal and civil laws.
This treatise was written in the year 1789. It was the first of it's kind. It has helped to make discoveries on the cause of death and manner in which a person died
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/18960271?referrer=searchResults
Your textbook says a person either has ethics or they do not. This chapter has potential to be much longer than it is think about adding
"situational" ethics. We say to children - "Never lie. Always tell the truth." Then we lie all the time and try to explain that a "little white lie" is
okay. So when it comes to ethics, obviously we want officers to be ethical. In your words - your opinion - what does it mean for an officer to be
ethical? How would you test that on an application? When judging police corruption, do you look at the act, or the intent? A police officer
getting free coffee or a half priced meal. Is that okay - why or why not?
Answer:Natasha is worried about upcoming elections. What kind of civic institution might she join to get involve
Explanation:
What two things can you never eat for breakfast?
Answer:
dinner and lunch
Explanation:
not breakfast
PLEASE HELPPPPPPPP ;) CORRECT WILL GET A BRAINLIST
how the CARES Act is supposed to support the economy.
Answer:
The CARES Act provided $10 billion to fund cash grants for small businesses and nonprofits. The Coronavirus Relief Bill provides an additional $20 billion in grants for those in especially disadvantaged areas. Eligible businesses can receive up to $10,000 in financial aid to cover immediate operating costs.
Can a kind person like me sometimes walk their daughter to School and to ask permission if it's okay to do so? If so, is it appropriate to have that? Because I'm a very kind and generous person by the way and either way I am flexible.
Well, unless you really know the kid you walking, and their guardian (We're talking months to years of knowing the parent and kid), then I don't see what is wrong with that.
When is it hardest to see motorcyclists?
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head on, they take up so little of your visual field.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot.
d. All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them.
The hardest to see motorcyclists : All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them. Option D is the correct answer.
Motorcyclists can be difficult to see in various situations, and it is essential for drivers to be vigilant and actively look for them. Here's an explanation for each option:
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head-on, they take up so little of your visual field: Motorcycles have a narrower profile compared to other vehicles, making them less visible when approaching from the opposite direction. Due to their smaller size, they can be easily overlooked, especially if drivers are not actively scanning for them.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes: Motorcycles can be particularly challenging to spot on the freeway due to the high volume of traffic and frequent lane changes. The quick maneuverability of motorcycles allows them to navigate through traffic, but this also increases the risk of being overlooked by drivers who are not attentive or fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot: Motorcycles can easily fall into a driver's blind spot, which is an area not visible in the rear-view or side mirrors. It is crucial for drivers to check their blind spots by turning their heads and using proper mirror adjustment to ensure they are aware of any motorcyclists in their vicinity.
Option D is the correct answer.
For such more question on motorcyclists:
https://brainly.com/question/27196118
#SPJ8
Tricia found a body that is in rigor mortis. How was she MOST likely to determine that this was happening?
A.
The body was the temperature of the air surrounding it.
B. The body was very rigid and stiff.
C.
The body had pools of blood in it.
D.
The body had lost a lot of tissue and was mainly bones.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
what is condensation ?
Answer:
water vapour rise high up in the air and cool down to form Tini droplet of water this process is called condensationhope it's helpful thanks
I know this isn’t a school topic but what happens or what do you do when you have to go to court for not going to school
Investigating Crime Scenes
Edmond Locard and his Principle of Exchange
Dr. Edmond Locard was the director of the world's first forensic lab in Lyon, France. In this capacity, her came up with what we now call Locard's Principle of Exchange. The idea is that whenever a person/place/thing comes in contact with another person/place/thing, there is some exchange of trace evidence. He also noted that the intensity and duration of the contact, and nature of the materials determine the extent of the transfer. For example, if you bump into someone on the sidewalk, there will be less exchange than if you spent four hours in their home.
Lessons from the JonBenet Ramsey Case
JonBenet Ramsey
The 1996 homicide (murder) investigation of six-year-old JonBenet Ramsey provides valuable lessons in proper crime scene investigation procedures. From this case, we learn how important it is to secure a crime scene. Key forensics evidence can be lost forever without a secure crime scene.
In the Ramsey case, the police in Boulder, Colorado, allowed extensive contamination of the crime scene. Police first thought JonBenet had been kidnapped because of a ransom note found by her mother. For this reason, the police did not search the house until seven hours after the family called 911. The first-responding officer was investigating the report of the kidnapping. The officer did not think to open the basement door, and so did not discover the murdered body of the girl.
Believing the crime was a kidnapping, the police blocked off JonBenet's bedroom with yellow and black crime scene tape to preserve evidence her kidnapper may have left behind. They didn't, however, seal off the rest of the house, which was also part of the crime scene. Then the victim's father, John Ramsey, discovered his daughter's body in the basement of the home. He covered her body with a blanket and carried her to the living room. In doing so, he contaminated the crime scene and may have disturbed evidence. That evidence might have identified the killer.
Once the body was found, family, friends, and police officers remained close by. The Ramseys and visitors were allowed to move freely around the house. One friend even helped clean the kitchen, wiping down the counters with a spray cleaner—possibly wiping away evidence. Many hours passed before police blocked off the basement room. A pathologist did not examine the body until more than 19 hours after the crime took place.
Ransom Note
To this day, JonBenet Ramsey's murder remains unsolved.
Your Task
Tell me about mistakes made in the handling of the crime scene in the JonBenet Ramsey case.
IN AT LEAST 1 FULL PARGRAPH of 4-6 sentences (don't number the questions!), answer the following:
What did investigators do wrong in the JonBenet Ramsey case? Consider the 7 Ss of Crime Scene Investigation. Were they all done?
Thinking in terms of Locard's Principle of Exchange (this means you have to talk about Locard's Principle of exchange), how did investigators' action (or lack thereof) influence what trace evidence was available to investigators?
Someone please help me
Answer:
point
Explanation:
Do you think the Constitution does more to protect a person's rights or limit them? Explain your answer.
Answer:
I think the constitution does more to protect a person's rights, the few setbacks on the constitution are for our own safety, and without these setbacks we would not be here today.
Explanation:
What’s a crime and explain at least to key elements
A crime is an act or omission that is prohibited by law and punishable by the legal system. Actus reus and mens rea, are generally required to establish criminal liability.
What is a crime and its elements?A crime is an offense against society as a whole, and the state or government is responsible for investigating, prosecuting, and punishing individuals who commit crimes. Here are two key elements that are generally associated with a crime:
1. Actus Reus: Actus reus refers to the physical or external element of a crime, often translated as the "guilty act." It represents the actual behavior or action committed by an individual that is considered unlawful. The actus reus can include various actions, such as theft, assault, murder, fraud, or any other action that is prohibited by law. In some cases, the failure to act when there is a legal duty to do so can also constitute actus reus. For example, not providing necessary care to a dependent person may be considered a crime.
2. Mens Rea: Mens rea refers to the mental state or intention of the person committing the act. It translates to "guilty mind" and signifies the state of mind or awareness of the person at the time of committing the crime. It encompasses the individual's knowledge, intent, recklessness, or negligence associated with the criminal act. The presence of mens rea distinguishes between intentional acts and acts that may have been committed without any criminal intent. Different levels of mens rea exist, such as intent to commit a crime, knowledge of the consequences of one's actions, or recklessness in disregarding potential harm caused by one's behavior.
Both elements, actus reus and mens rea, are generally required to establish criminal liability. It is crucial for the prosecution to prove that the accused person committed the prohibited act (actus reus) and had the requisite mental state (mens rea) at the time of the offense. The specific elements and requirements can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the crime.
learn more about crime: https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Yellow lines separate
a. traffic lanes moving in opposite directions
b. traffic lanes on one-way streets
c. pedestrians from vehicles
d. all cars on the roadway
Answer:
A. Traffic lanes moving in opposite directions
Explanation:
Yellow lines separate traffic lanes moving in opposite directions.
While white lines are used to separate lanes that are moving in the same direction, yellow lines separate sections of lanes that are moving in opposite directions.
3. Josiah is a police officer. Each day, he must do his job in
accordance with laws that govern his daily duties, such as arrest,
use of force, searches, and seizures. Consider and explain how
regulations in each of these areas impact his work and the
members of his community.
As a police officer, Josiah is under regulations that oversee his normal duties involving arrest, force, searches, and seizures. These controls are established to ensure that his operations are inline with the law, as well as guarantee the protections of the citizens whom he serves.
How Josiah uses the regulationsArrests:
For an arrest, Josiah must substantiate plausible cause which authenticates that the person being apprehended has committed an offense. This demonstrates that he needs to have a sensible opinion, supported by facts and circumstances, that crime has ensued. If Josiah falls short of verifying probable cause, the arrest may be considered delinquent and he may be held responsible for ignoring the rights of the subject.
Force:
Josiah is allowed to use strength when necessary to safeguard himself or others from danger or catch a wrongdoer. Nevertheless, he has to utilize only the required degree of power to control the situation. In case he deploys surplus strength, it is considered illegitimate and he might face disciplinary measures.
Searches:
Inability to abide by certain procedures, such as getting consent or a warrant before conducting a search, Josiah can query a person or property if there is convincing evidence of the presence of criminal activity. Nonetheless, if he does not comply with the protocols or performs an unreasonable hunt, the findings henceforth might be dismissed in court and he could be liable for disregarding the liberties of the subject.
Seizures:
Disregard for procedures precedes a seizure for Josiah, who must acquire a warrant before proceeding to confiscating any belonging if he has enough reason to judge that it was used in a criminal act or is proof of one. Unreasonable seizing of goods will, however, necessitate these items to be returned to their owner while leaving Josiah answerable for not offering due consideration of the rights of the involved individual.
Read more on police officers here:https://brainly.com/question/29668617
#SPJ1
Which constitutional right is the foundation of the right to form and participate in interest groups?
Group of answer choices
A Freedom of assembly
B Equal protection under the laws
Answer:
A Freedom of Assembly
Explanation:
wassup ze nice ta hear from you how r u
Explanation:
come on my Google meet for chat ...
THE MEETING CODE IS:-
pcn-veih-fjy
plzz come fast plzzz
plz come on Google meet...8
Answer:
Nothing, just the normal routine life, but glad to have summer break!
state five ways through which political party can be funded
Answer:
Explanation:
Public funds, extortion, political fund raising, government funds, embezzembezzlement, or having a independently wealthy political leader.
A car driven by a vacationer and a tractor-trailer driven by truck driver collided with each other. The vacationer filed an action based on negligence against the truck driver in federal district court in the state in which he resided. The court had subject-matter jurisdiction over this action but not personal jurisdiction over the truck driver, who did not reside in the forum state but rather in the state in which the accident had occurred. The truck driver timely filed a motion to dismiss the action due to lack of personal jurisdiction and proper venue. May the court transfer the action to the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice
Answer:
Answer C is correct
Explanation:
Although venue isn't improper in the forum court because the accident did not occur in the forum state nor did the defendant truck driver reside there, the forum court may transfer the action to any judicial district in which it originally could of been brought if it determines that such transfer in the interest of justice. Here, the action could of been brought into the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides
Considering the situation described in the question, it is true that:
The court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
This is based on the United States law code 28, Part IV, Chapter 87, Subsection 1404, Article A., which explains the need for Change of Venue.
This portion of the United States code stated that for convenience purposes that involve parties to the case and witnesses, particularly in the interest of justice, a district court might move any civil action to any other district to which all parties have consented.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that it is true that the court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24893162
Domestic violence in the home:
A) Increases the risk of physical abuse.
B) Decreases the risk of physical abuse.
C) Often accompanies physical abuse of children in the home.
D) Is unrelated to child abuse.
E) Leads to a greater risk of neglect.
Answer:
I feel like its A
Explanation:
Im sorry if im wrong but my gut is telling me A because domestic violence around the world increases the chances of physical abuse.
If Anton is charged with a crime and sued in a civil action, how would the civil case
differ from the criminal trial? Please explain.
Answer:NO
Explanation:
The correct answer is NO.
If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together because civil law doesn't involve criminal matters and procedures in civil and criminal trials are very different.
There are lawsuits for different cases, if Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
What is civil action?
The civil action is a lawsuit for noncriminal actions that started with a complaint. this lawsuit usually involves private parties.
Since Anton's case is a criminal case, the case not be tried in a civil action because they don't involve criminal matters. Also, procedures in civil and criminal trials are different.
Therefore, If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
Learn more on civil action here,
brainly.com/question/499624
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
Forensic toxicologist John Trestrail used DNA to work on the Crippen case decades later. What did this new technology help determine?
A. Dr. Crippen and Cora never had children.
B. The body in the basement wasn’t Cora’s.
C. Cora wrote the letter to Dr. Crippen.
D. A relative of Cora’s killed her in the United States.
It wasn't Cora's body that was in the basement. The correct response is option (B).
What is the Crippen case?The murder trial of Dr. Hawley Harvey Crippen took place in 1910, after which he poisoned his wife (who went by the stage name Belle Elmore), dismembered and buried her bones in the coal cellar, and fled London with his mistress-secretary, Miss Ethel Le Neve. They were able to obtain a histology slide from the coal cellar that belonged to Dr. Spilsbury, separate the DNA, and conduct DNA testing on it. Three of Cora's maternal relatives had their mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is exclusively passed down through the maternal line, examined by researchers. John Ellis and William Willis executed 48-year-old Crippen by hanging in Pentonville on November 23, 1910.
To know more about Crippen case, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28668333
#SPJ1
How does college works?
If i want to become a lawyer right..... do i go straight to law school or do have to go to regular college and major in something or a certain major to become a lawyer or ? please explain and if its a certain major what is that major?
Answer:
law
Explanation:
you have to start with pre law and take a major in that and around junior year of college you would do the type of law just depending on which college u go to
What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? (Select all that apply.) Responses To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence during a criminal trial.
What is evidence?Evidence is any type of proof that is used to support a claim or conclusion. It can be physical, such as an object or document, or it can be testimonial, such as a witness providing a statement. Evidence is often used in legal proceedings to prove a point of law or fact. It can also be used in scientific research to support or refute a hypothesis. Evidence can also be used in everyday life to support an argument or decision. In any situation, evidence should be reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the claim or conclusion.
This rule ensures that police do not arrest people without a legal cause, that evidence is collected legally, and that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. Additionally, it ensures that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
To learn more about evidence
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ1
What issues does article 1 of the constitution deal with
Answer:
Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has.