why was the marshall court case marbury v. madison so important for the power of the supreme court?

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Incorporation is the legal process used to form a corporate entity or company. A corporation is the resulting legal entity that separates the firm's assets and income from its owners and investors

Read it and think what is the correct answer

The three holy books that are taken as authority are the bible, the koran and the torah.

Religious books are a concept that refers to the holy writings of a religion in which the history of the religion is narrated and some of the principles of conduct and ethics for the followers of that religion are established.

The religious books used as authority are those of the Christian, Islam and Judaism religions, these are:

Bible: This holy book is a set of canonical books that are considered the record of the relationship between God and humanity. The Bible is organized by two main parts; Old Testament and the New Testament that focuses on Jesus Christ and early Christianity.

Koran: This is the sacred book of Islam, it is the word of God revealed to Muhammad who is considered to have received these revelations through the archangel Gabriel.

Torah: This book is the text that contains the law and the identity heritage of the Jewish people that constitutes the basis and foundation of Judaism.

These books have been used as a doctrine to establish codes of thought and action in the followers of these religions and an interpretation of how individuals should behave in society.

Learn more about holy scriptures in: https://brainly.com/question/11932209

#SPJ1

Withdrawal the national guard, Civil rights act 1957 and Civil rights act 1960 and Integration of us military forces are the  civil rights policies the eisenhower administration pursue.

Eisenhower intervened in the Little Rock incident and told Governor Faubus to remove the national guard (he was trying to stop desegregation in schools). After that, he overturned segregation in public schools by appointing Earl Warren, the governor of California, as the court's chief justice. After that, schools were integrated.

Both the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts, In 1957, if states found new ways to prevent black people from voting, they would be looked into and prosecuted. As voting registers were checked and black people were legally permitted to vote in 1960, black voters' votes were unquestionably counted.

Eisenhower was a soldier before joining the military and intimately familiar with racial intolerance. He demanded that Truman's executive order 9981 be followed.

Learn more about Civil Rights Acts at:

brainly.com/question/12447824

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Garratt v. Dailey case involved the issue of intentional tort, specifically the tort of battery. In this case, the plaintiff, Brian Garratt, alleged that the defendant, Denny Dailey, intentionally and unlawfully pulled a chair from beneath him as he was attempting to sit down, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The main question in the case was whether the defendant's actions constituted intentional battery, even though he claimed it was an accident. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's actions were indeed intentional and constituted battery, regardless of his intent to harm.

I believe this is your answer, I hope this helps!

The filibuster was seldom utilized all through a large portion of American history however has turned into a much of the time involved strategy in the U.S. Senate during the most recent 20 years. Option B is correct .

Filibusters became more common toward the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, prompting serious consideration of amending Senate rules to end the practice. At that point, the Senate had grown in size and became more active. Because of the amount of work that needed to be done each session, a senator who chose to filibuster might make it hard for the body to move forward and get concessions from senators who wanted to approve their measures.

10 ​​​​​: Grand jury is the role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a Judge , Option B is correct .

The federal criminal case prosecutor, the U.S. attorney, presents evidence to a grand jury. If there is "probable cause" to suspect the defendant of committing a crime, the grand jury decides whether a trial should be held.

11 : Chief office of the president is the  Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the Cabinet . Option C is correct .

The White House Office, the Public safety Gathering, the Committee of Monetary Counselors, and the Workplace of The board and Financial plan are the four associations that make up the Leader Office of the President , which gives the president guidance in significant approach regions.

12 : Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as Fireside chats .  Option C is correct .

Throughout the 1930 s and 1940 s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave radio addresses that were referred to as "fireside chats." FDR gave radio broadcasts to calm the nation during a turbulent time and explain things in a way that most people could understand.

Learn more about filibuster :

brainly.com/question/29551874

#SPJ4

Complete question as follows :

The filibuster

A. Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate

B. Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years

C. Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years

D. Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate

Question 10

The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a

A. Judge

B. Grand jury

C. Prosecuting attorney

D. Defense attorney

Question 11

The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the

A. Cabinet

B. White House Staff

C. Executive office of the president

D. Department of the Interior Top of Form

Question 12

Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as

A. A frequent annoyance

B. Weekly Ramblings

C. Fireside Chats

D. Happy times

The three key supporting evidence for the topic "A person seeking to protect their property will seek out and often obtain, a lien on that property" in the context of secured transactions are,

1. Legal Protection

2. Creditor's Security Interest

3. Priority and Protection against Other Claims

1. Legal Protection: The law recognizes and supports the concept of liens as a means of protecting property interests. In many jurisdictions, specific statutes govern the creation, perfection, and enforcement of liens. For example, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in the United States provides a comprehensive legal framework for secured transactions, including the creation and enforcement of liens on personal property. This legal recognition and protection incentivize individuals to seek liens as a way to safeguard their property.

2. Creditor's Security Interest: Obtaining a lien can provide security to creditors who extend credit or loans to individuals. By establishing a lien on the debtor's property, the creditor has a legal claim on the property, which serves as collateral for the debt. If the debtor defaults on the loan, the creditor can enforce the lien by foreclosing on the property, selling it, and using the proceeds to satisfy the debt. This security interest encourages creditors to provide loans and credit on more favorable terms, as their risk is mitigated by the lien.

3. Priority and Protection against Other Claims: A lien can also establish priority over other claimants who may have an interest in the property. In secured transactions, the order of priority determines which creditor gets paid first from the proceeds of the collateral in the event of default or bankruptcy. By obtaining a lien, a person can secure their position as a priority creditor, ensuring they have a better chance of recovering their debt or obligation from the property's value ahead of other claimants. This priority status provides a strong incentive for individuals to seek liens to protect their property.

In conclusion, the legal recognition and protection of liens, the security they provide to creditors, and the establishment of priority over other claims are three supporting pieces of evidence highlighting why a person seeking to protect their property will often obtain a lien. Liens serve as an effective tool in securing property interests and ensuring repayment of debts or obligations.

Know more about Legal Protection here:

https://brainly.com/question/30362023

#SPJ8

Referendum: The public may approve or veto a law that the legislature has passed.

To Learn more About  Referendum refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/1620127

#SPJ4

Institutional social control includes schools, while public social control includes police. Your answer is: a. schools; police.

Institutional social control refers to the use of formal, organized systems and structures within society to regulate and influence the behavior of individuals and groups. These systems may include laws, regulations, policies, and institutions such as the police, courts, and correctional facilities. The purpose of institutional social control is to promote compliance with social norms and values, maintain order, and deter and punish deviant behavior. Examples of institutional social control include the criminal justice system, which uses laws and law enforcement to regulate behavior and punish offenders, and regulatory agencies that oversee industries and enforce rules to protect public health and safety.

Learn more about Institutional social control here:

https://brainly.com/question/9014176

#SPJ11

Answer: Federal government, trial and appellate

Explanation:

The federal government and each of the fifty state governments maintain their own system of courts. These systems include both trial courts and appellate courts.

The sanction that is awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed is compensatory damages.

Compensatory damages are the payment given by one party to another to compensate for any losses or damages that may have occurred as a result of a breach of contract. Compensatory damages are the most common form of damages awarded for a breach of contract. The main objective of compensatory damages is to ensure that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed. This means that the damages awarded should compensate the aggrieved party for any losses they have suffered as a result of the breach of contract.

Compensatory damages can be awarded for various types of losses, including direct damages, incidental damages, and consequential damages. The damages awarded will vary depending on the type of loss suffered and the terms of the contract. In order to recover compensatory damages, the aggrieved party must prove that they have suffered a loss as a result of the breach of contract and that the loss is measurable in monetary terms.

In conclusion, compensatory damages are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed.

Learn more about compensatory damages: https://brainly.com/question/4395083

#SPJ11

The answer should be D-Learners license. From what I can tell, this is the Drivers license course. You don't need a high school diploma, you don't need a private pilots license, and I don't know of an ID card course. The Learners license in Florida must be held for 12 months before you can get your license.

I hope I've helped! :)

The Search and Seizure clause of the IV Amendment became more prominent in the 20th Century due to three main reasons: evolving societal norms, advancements in technology, and the development of the exclusionary rule.

Firstly, evolving societal norms led to a greater emphasis on personal privacy and civil liberties. As the 20th Century progressed, citizens became more aware of their rights and the importance of individual privacy. This shift in public opinion placed a greater focus on the IV Amendment and its protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
Secondly, advancements in technology during the 20th Century made it easier for law enforcement to conduct searches and gather evidence. Wiretapping, electronic surveillance, and other forms of covert investigation became more prevalent, raising concerns about the balance between effective policing and protecting individual privacy. Lastly, the development of the exclusionary rule in the early 20th Century played a significant role in the increased prominence of the Search and Seizure clause.

Learn more about technology from here:

https://brainly.com/question/27884705

#SPJ11

Answer:

D. motion to dismiss

Explanation:

The tax act recently vetoed by the President is not necessarily dead. For the act to be passed despite the presidential veto, it will require a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

The vetoing of a tax act by the President does not mean that the act is dead. However, it implies that the bill is not yet law. A vetoed bill can still become law if Congress overrides the veto. A bill can be vetoed by the president of the United States, but it can be overridden by Congress. If both the House and Senate vote to override the veto with a two-thirds majority, the bill becomes law without the president's signature.

For the bill to become law, Congress must override the veto. The House of Representatives and the Senate must have a two-thirds majority vote in order to override a presidential veto. The bill then becomes law without the president's signature. Here are the steps for the act to be passed:

1. The House and Senate will reconsider the tax act following the presidential veto.

2. Both chambers must pass the tax act with a two-thirds majority vote.

3. If the two-thirds majority is achieved in both the House and Senate, the tax act will become law despite the President's veto.

Learn more about Vetoed:

https://brainly.com/question/29549392

#SPJ11

The guidelines that the Health and Human Services has established as standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.

This is a federal service that established the standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace in order to protect against conduct that is harmful to consumers or prevents the efficient operation of the Marketplace

Hence, the guidelines on standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.

Read more about HHS

brainly.com/question/2093822

#SPJ1

Answer:

d

Explanation:

The statement "A district court must follow the decision of a circuit court of appeals in a neighboring jurisdiction" is not always true. So, Correct answer is false.

It depends on the circumstances and jurisdiction involved. Stare decisis refers to the principle that previous court decisions serve as precedent for future cases on similar issues. The idea is that a court should follow its own prior decisions and the decisions of higher courts within the same jurisdiction in order to ensure consistency and stability in the law.

The principle of stare decisis has limitations, however. One significant limitation is that it only applies within the same jurisdiction. This means that a district court is not required to follow the decision of a circuit court of appeals in a neighboring jurisdiction. Instead, district courts are bound to follow the decisions of their own circuit court of appeals. If a district court disagrees with the decision of its circuit court of appeals,

Learn more about jurisdiction Visit : brainly.com/question/10377896

#SPJ11

The rise of radicals in France had a significant impact on WWI. The radicalization of French politics resulted in a more aggressive and interventionist foreign policy, which led to France's participation in the war.

The radicals also played a key role in shaping the social and economic policies of France during the war, which in turn influenced the country's military strategy and ability to fight.

Additionally, the radicalization of French society led to a rise in political extremism and social unrest, which further complicated the country's ability to effectively wage war.

Overall, the rise of radicals in France had both positive and negative impacts on the country's involvement in WWI.

Read more about World War 1 at https://brainly.com/question/12233146

#SPJ11

Answer:

Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.

Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.

It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.

However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.

Learn more about cheese shop here:

https://brainly.com/question/22734191

#SPJ2

Answer:

The constitution is influenced by the political principle of the “rule of law”. The answer is True

Explanation:

I need brainliest

Answer:

Hey there! I’m Billy, the guy behind BRB | Gone Somewhere Epic. I’ve been travelling around the world for six years, having an absolute blast going on epic adventures, without breaking the bank

Explanation:

Known as the world’s largest democracy, India is a truly fascinating country with a very proud people. It’s so awesome that I’ve been fortunate to visit India four times, and yearn to go back again.

Did you know: India was once an island, and even a part of Antarctica! About 50 million years ago, it connected with the Asian continental plate, and the Himalayas was born.

So I put together a compilation of the most incredible facts about this amazing country, including unusual, shocking, and lesser-known facts that will leave you in awe.

Did you also know: 47 is not only the number of awesome facts in this post, but is also the year (1947) that India became an independent nation!

Scroll on to read more amazing, fun, random, and interesting facts about India with pictures.

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

Answer:

Are you crazy this is brainly.us

Answer:

what is that I don't understand

Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.

Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.

Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.

So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.

Learn more about consumer in: https://brainly.com/question/950909

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The vicarious responsibility is based on (D)  Respondeat superior.

Vicarious responsibility refers to a legal doctrine that holds one party responsible for the actions or omissions of another party. It is based on the principle of "Respondeat superior," which means "let the master answer" in Latin. This doctrine is primarily applied in the context of employer-employee relationships, where an employer may be held liable for the actions of their employees performed within the scope of their employment.

Respondeat's superior holds that employers are vicariously responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts committed by their employees while carrying out their job duties. This means that if an employee causes harm or damage to someone else due to their actions or negligence during the course of their employment, the employer can be held legally accountable for the employee's actions.

The concept of respondeat superior is based on the idea that employers have a degree of control and authority over their employees, and therefore, they should bear the responsibility for any harm caused by their employees' actions within the scope of their employment.

In contrast, the other options are not directly related to the concept of vicarious responsibility:

A. Proximate cause refers to the legal concept that establishes a close connection between the defendant's actions and the resulting harm.

B. Consent decree is a legal agreement reached between parties to resolve a dispute without admission of guilt or liability.

C. Duty of care refers to the legal obligation to act in a manner that avoids causing harm to others.

Therefore, the correct answer for vicarious responsibility is (D) Respondeat superior, as it specifically relates to the liability of employers for the actions of their employees. Therefore, the correct option is D.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

Which of the following is vicarious responsibility based on? Select one.

Question 9 options:

A. Proximate cause

B. Consent decree

C. Duty of care

D. Respondeat superior

Know more about Respondeat superior here:

https://brainly.com/question/32243532

#SPJ8

There is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

China's Belt and Road Initiative, a significant economic programme spanning Asia and Europe, includes Xinjiang as a key component.

Beijing wants to continue developing Xinjiang, which is home to China's greatest coal and natural gas reserves, and wants to do so by eliminating any chance of separatist action.

Ever since the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came to power in 1949, Xinjiang has been a part of China. There are Uyghurs who advocate for independence from China and refer to the area as East Turkestan.

Therefore, there is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

To know more about the Xinjiang aspect of China, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7178318

#SPJ1