which of the following is not a narcotic? opium LSD codeine heroin
Answer:
lsd
Explanation:
How many amendments in the constitution of the united states.
Answer:
27
Explanation:
The first time a law journal published an article that explained the legal theory about why U.S. courts should recognize a right to privacy was in ______.
The first time a law journal published an article that explained the legal theory about why U.S. courts should recognize a right to privacy was in 1890.
The article, titled "The Right to Privacy," was written by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis and was published in the Harvard Law Review. In this article, Warren and Brandeis argued that the law should recognize an individual's right to privacy as a natural right that is necessary for the preservation of personal dignity and autonomy.
They contended that this right should protect individuals from the invasion of their private lives by the press and other intrusive actors. The publication of this article was a significant moment in the development of privacy law in the United States and has influenced the development of privacy jurisprudence both in the United States and around the world.
To learn more about right to privacy, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
according to article 7 of the nar code of ethics, which of these statements is most accurate when accepting compensation from parties to a transaction?
Article 7 of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Code of Ethics states that real estate agents must disclose to their clients any financial benefits they receive from the transaction.
This includes compensation from both the buyer and the seller, as well as any referral fees or compensation from other parties. The disclosure must be made in a timely and complete manner, and the agent must obtain the client's informed consent before accepting any compensation. This helps to ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, as clients are able to make fully informed decisions about their transactions with all relevant information disclosed to them by their agent.
To know more about National Association of Realtors click here:
brainly.com/question/31226349
#SPJ4
What is an example of contractionary economic policy?
A) Lowering the interest rate at which banks borrow money
B) Increases to the corporate tax rate
C) Executive orders that reduce regulations on businesses
D) Spending programs aimed at repairing infrastructure
Answer: B
Explanation: Increases to the corporate tax rate
what is section 398 ipc
Explanation:
Section 398 in The Indian Penal Code. 398. Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon. —If, at the time of attempting to commit robbery or dacoity, the offender is armed with any deadly weapon, the imprisonment with which such offender shall be punished shall not be less than seven years.
Living beyond your means is a dangerous practice.
O True
O False
Dora is driving 15 mph over the speed limit on a busy, crowded street. Paul jaywalks in the middle of the block and as he steps into the street is hit by Dora. In a contributory negligence state, the jury or judge will most likely apportion some percentage of negligence to Dora and some percentage to Paul, and award damages on that basis. A) true XX B) false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Contributory negligence in a car accident says that when a pedestrian is jaywalking on the road they are violating traffick regulations.
When they get hit by a car they are not entitled to any financial compensation by the owner of the vehicle.
The person that is harmed does not get any compensation because they were negligent.
However in this scenario Dora was also driving 15 mph above the speed limit.
Since both Dora and Paul were violating traffick laws, the judge will most likely apportion a percentage of the negligence to Dora and some to Paul
A homeowner looked out his front window one day and saw a neighbor standing on a narrow ledge on the second story of the house across the street. He also saw a ladder lying on the ground beneath where the neighbor was stranded. The homeowner ran out and picked up the ladder and placed it against the side of the house. However, he set it atop a patch of ice. As the neighbor started down the ladder, a rotten rung broke and he fell to the ground and was injured. If the neighbor sues the homeowner for damages for his injuries, will he recover
In this situation, it is possible that the homeowner could be held liable for the neighbor's injuries. This is because the homeowner took action by placing the ladder on the ice, which could be considered a negligent act.
Negligence occurs when someone fails to exercise reasonable care, causing harm to another person. If the neighbor can prove that the homeowner's actions directly led to their injuries, they may have a valid claim for damages.
However, it ultimately depends on the specific laws and circumstances of the jurisdiction where the incident occurred. It would be advisable for the neighbor to consult with a lawyer to determine their legal options.
Know more about negligent act:
https://brainly.com/question/31454038
#SPJ11
Identify and describe at least three ways the criminal justice system operates to allow for an overrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos/as in the prisons. Be sure and give one example involving the police, one involving the courts, and one involving corrections. Further discuss what can be done to change this issue facing corrections. Your question must be a minimum of ten sentences in order to receive full credit.
The criminal justice system continues to disproportionately affect African Americans and Latinos/as in its imprisonment levels, for which there are several explanations.
How to explain the informationThe three primary factors implicated in this issue include:
1. Racial Profiling and Biased Policing: Research has demonstrated that law enforcement agencies often perform racial profiling or engage in biased policing practices, leading to the disparate halt, search, and arrest rates of Blacks and Latinos compared to those from other races or ethnicities.
2. Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Three-Strike Laws: Mandatory minimum sentences and three-strike laws have earned strong criticism for their unduly harsh impact on minorities; these legal doctrines necessitate judicial imposition of a set penalty, regardless of specifics pertaining to an individual case.
3. Poverty/Resource Inequalities: Unequal access to resources like quality legal representation further accelerates the overrepresentation of Black and Latino people in prisons, as individuals living in poverty may not possess the capability to effectively navigate the criminal justice system.
Learn more about justice on
https://brainly.com/question/25756666
#SPJ1
8. Why can't the Vice President take part in
Senate Debate?
Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.
Why can't the Vice President take part in Senate Debate?
The only constitutional obligation for a vice president is to preside over the Senate, except from taking over as president in the event of a president's demise or resignation. Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.
According to the Constitution, the vice president of the United States leads the Senate. The vice president officially preside over the receipt and tabulation of electoral votes cast in presidential elections in addition to acting as the meeting's presiding officer. He or she also has the only authority to break a deadlock in the Senate.
A vice president in the government is someone whose main duty is to take the president's position in the case of the latter's demise, resignation, or incapacity.
Learn more about Vice President :
https://brainly.com/question/18882530
#SPJ1
The current federal law that penalizes drug possession and sale is referred to as the:
a) Harrison Act
b) Marihuana Tax Act
c) Drug Control Act (or Controlled Substances Act)
d) Punitive Drug Strike Law
e) The Richard Milhous Nixon Anti-Drug Law
The current federal law that penalizes drug possession and sale is referred to as the Drug Control Act (or Controlled Substances Act)
The Controlled Substances Act establishes five schedules of controlled substances based on their medical use, potential for abuse, and safety. The schedules range from Schedule I, which includes drugs with a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, to Schedule V, which includes drugs with a low potential for abuse and accepted medical use. The act also established penalties for drug possession, trafficking, and manufacturing, and created federal agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to enforce drug laws and regulate controlled substances. The act has been amended several times over the years, but it remains a central component of federal drug policy in the United States.
Learn more about schedules here:
https://brainly.com/question/14448019
#SPJ11
1. The intention to create a legal relation may be shown by
A. the words of the parties only
B. the conduct of the parties only
C. the written documents made by the parties only
D. the words and the conduct of the parties
Answer:
she is right ....
In order for complete diversity to exist, which of the following must be TRUE? [a] all parties are citizens of different states [b] all P are citizens of different states [c] all D are citizens of different states [d] no D is a citizen of the same state as any P
In order for complete diversity to exist no D is a citizen of the same state as any P. Option D is correct.
In United States law, complete diversity is a term used in relation to diversity jurisdiction, which is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction that gives the power to hear lawsuits that do not involve a federal question for U.S. federal courts. To have diverse jurisdiction over a lawsuit, two conditions must be met by the U.S. federal court.
The First condition is there must be “diversity of citizenship” between the parties, meaning the plaintiffs must be citizens of different U.S. states than the defendants. The Second condition is the lawsuit’s “amount in controversy” must be more than $75,000.
To learn more about Diversity.
https://brainly.com/question/30144508
#SPJ4
help if u can
200/200
yea yea yea
Answer:
1
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is 1.
Explanation:
200/200
=1
What is the legal position of persons without combatant status who nevertheless take an active part in hostilities? What are the legal consequences these individuals may face for their conduct?
The legal status of noncombatants who take an active part in hostilities is a complicated and contentious subject of international law.
People who directly engage in hostilities without being lawful fighters or having status as a combatant are sometimes referred to as "unprivileged belligerents" or "unlawful combatants" under international humanitarian law.
Individuals who engage in hostilities against the law may face prosecution by their state. Typically, these cases are predicated on crimes like terrorism, war crimes, or other criminal behaviors.
Learn more about hostilities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30331571
#SPJ4
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
Mr. X has been a member of a retirement fund managed by ABC Cover for many
years. He joined the fund as part of his employment contract at DEF Wholesalers. When joining the fund, he also completed a nomination form in terms of which he
nominated his two sons from his first marriage as the beneficiaries in the event of
his death. On his death he is survived by four dependents, his two sons from his
first marriage, his second wife and a daughter whom he and his second wife had
adopted. ABC Cover, instead of acting only in terms of the nomination, allocates
the benefits payable by the fund to all four dependents. With this in mind, answer
the following question. Fully advise Mr X’s two sons on whether they can
successfully approach the court to request an order declaring that the benefits
must be paid to them to the exclusion of the second wife and the adopted
daughter
In the given scenario, Mr. X nominated his two sons from his first marriage as beneficiaries of his retirement fund in the event of his death. However, ABC Cover, the fund manager, allocated the benefits to all four dependents, including Mr. X's second wife and adopted daughter.
To determine whether Mr. X's two sons can successfully approach the court to request an order declaring that the benefits should be paid to them exclusively, several factors may need to be considered:
1. Employment Contract: It would be important to review the terms of Mr. X's employment contract with DEF Wholesalers to understand any provisions or agreements related to the retirement fund and beneficiary designations.
2. Nomination Form: The content and legal validity of the nomination form completed by Mr. X would be relevant. The form's wording, clarity, and adherence to applicable laws and regulations can impact the enforceability of the nomination.
3. Applicable Laws: The jurisdiction's laws governing retirement funds, beneficiary designations, and spousal rights should be examined. Different regions have different laws that may prioritize spousal rights or provide specific rules for beneficiary designations.
4. Contractual Obligations: The terms and conditions of the retirement fund itself, including any governing documents, rules, or policies, may outline the criteria for determining beneficiaries and the fund manager's discretion.
Based on these considerations, Mr. X's two sons may need to consult with a legal professional to evaluate the specific circumstances, applicable laws, and supporting documentation. A court would ultimately determine the outcome based on the relevant legal framework and evidence presented.
It's important to remember that the advice provided here is of a general nature and not a substitute for personalized legal counsel.
What the Meanning of scenario?A scenario, or script for a film is a blueprint written for a film or television show. Scenarios can be produced in the form of original preparations or adaptations of existing writings such as literary works. The format is structured in such a way that 1 page usually takes 1 minute.
Learn More About scenario at https://brainly.com/question/30275614
#SPJ11
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
Analisis "Preciosidad" de clarice lispector por favor alguien urgente
List and discuss at least three reasons as to why incarcerating delinquents may not reduce their crime rates. What other reasons can you think of that might influence delinquent incarceration? What other alternatives might you suggest?
Three reasons why incarcerating delinquents may not reduce crime rate are:
Lack of rehabilitation and educational programs.Exposure to hardened criminals.Disruption of social ties.Why will Incarcerating Delinquents not reduce Crime Rate?The reasons why incarcerating delinquents may not reduce crime rates are:
Lack of rehabilitation and educational programs: Incarceration alone may not provide the necessary rehabilitation and education programs that can help reduce recidivism among delinquent offenders. Without these programs, individuals may return to their criminal behavior after being released from prison.Exposure to hardened criminals: Incarcerating delinquents with hardened criminals may expose them to negative influences and potentially increase their likelihood of committing crimes in the future.Disruption of social ties: Incarceration can disrupt an individual's social ties, making it difficult for them to reintegrate into society and find employment upon release. This can increase the likelihood of recidivism.Other reasons that might influence delinquent incarceration include the cost of incarceration and the capacity of the prison system.
Learn more about crime rate here: https://brainly.com/question/13772436
#SPJ1
What Publication Covers Customs and Courtesies
The publication that covers customs and courtesies in the United States military is called "Army Regulation 600-25: Salutes, Honors and Visits of Courtesy."
Which Publication Covers Customs and Courtesies?Army Regulation 600-25 is the official publication of the United States Army that covers the customs and courtesies to be observed by military personnel.
It provides guidance on how to show proper respect and etiquette towards superiors, peers, and subordinates in various situations.
The regulation details the proper ways to salute, offer greetings, and show respect to the national flag and the military colors.
It also covers visits of courtesy, which are formal visits made by military personnel to other military units or civilian officials.
The regulation is an essential resource for all members of the U.S. Army, as it helps to maintain discipline, professionalism, and mutual respect within the organization.
It serves as a guide for military customs and courtesies that are deeply rooted in tradition and history and help to maintain the integrity and honor of the military profession.
Learn more about customs and courtesies
brainly.com/question/28319311
#SPJ11
What is superficial equity failing to build
to take time to build equity-centered knowledge and fluency, leading to behavioral shifts without understanding deeper meaning or historical context
Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply
Common few refers to the fact that judges can only look at written taw to make a decision
Common law evokes in part based on decisions in court cases
Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.
Common law means that only written bws can be interpreted by judges.
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process
Answer:
2 & 3 I think
Explanation:
The statements about common law are not true is
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process.Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
The set of decisions created by judges and legal procedures starting in the Middle Ages is known as common law. there was not a codified system of laws, instead that there were historical policies and procedures that guided current legal choices.
This method of approaching the law is still employed by the American legal system, which uses earlier cases to guide present-day judgments.
Learn more about Common Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ2
Công ty Z có giao kết HĐLĐ có thời hạn 36 tháng (từ 1/1/2019 đến 1/1/2022) với người lao động Y, công việc là công nhân xưởng bao bì, mức lương 7.000.000 VNĐ/tháng. Ngày 1/10/2021, do xưởng bao bì có kế hoạch sáp nhập với xưởng đóng gói nên một số công nhân, trong đó có Y bị dư thừa. Ngày 5/10/2021, Công ty bố trí cho Y làm công việc bảo vệ xưởng đóng gói, mức lương 5.500.000/tháng. Y không đồng ý với phương án này, từ 6/10/2021, Y lên công ty nhưng không được bố trí làm công việc gì, công ty cũng không chấm dứt HĐLĐ với Y. Ngày 26/10/2021, phòng nhân sự có thông báo Y không được hưởng lương tháng 10/2021 vì không làm việc. Y tìm đến VPLS để bảo vệ quyền lợi của mình.
Với tư cách là người tư vấn, anh (chị) hãy:
1. Xây dựng bảng câu hỏi cho tình huống nói trên (chỉ dành cho sinh viên có số tận cùng của MSSV là số chẵn)
2. Xác định vấn đề pháp lý và văn bản áp dụng (chỉ dành cho sinh viên có số tận cùng của MSSV là số lẻ)
3. Xây dựng các phương án tư vấn cho tình huống nói trên (dành cho tất cả sinh viên)
Answer: 3. Xây dựng các phương án tư vấn cho tình huống nói trên (dành cho tất cả sinh viên)
Explanation: Cả hai câu trả lời một và hai đều có thể áp dụng được. Do đó, câu trả lời thứ ba là câu trả lời chính xác.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/18468755
Do you think it was important for congress to finish what they started?
Answer:
it depends
Explanation:
you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.
if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.
____________ protects law enforcement agents from being sued for damages unless they violate clearly established law which a reasonable official in the agent's position would have known.
Answer:
qualified immunity is the correct answer!!
Explanation:
The ability to vote is one of the most important rights in a democracy. People should be able to vote easily, and voting laws should be written to make sure that the largest number of people are able to vote. Voting stations should be easy to get to and should be open early enough so that everyone has time to vote.
Answer:
that's true
Explanation:
in all the questionnaire as already stated it all, electorate should be allowed to exercise their franchise because that's one of the right a citizen of a state or country is entitled to
the right to vote without regard to race, color, or previous condition of servitude was guaranteed by the __________ amendment.
The right to vote without regard to race, color, or previous condition of servitude was guaranteed by the Fifteenth Amendment.
The Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1870, granted African American men the right to vote. It states that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." This amendment was a significant milestone in the struggle for civil rights and aimed to eliminate racial discrimination in voting practices. It sought to ensure that all citizens, regardless of their race or past servitude, could exercise their fundamental right to participate in the democratic process by casting their vote.
The Fifteenth Amendment was a direct response to the systemic disenfranchisement and discrimination faced by African Americans during the Reconstruction era following the Civil War. Despite the amendment, however, many states implemented discriminatory practices such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and intimidation tactics to prevent African Americans from voting. These measures, collectively known as Jim Crow laws, effectively circumvented the intent of the Fifteenth Amendment and continued to suppress the African American vote for decades.
It wasn't until the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s that concerted efforts were made to dismantle these discriminatory practices and enforce the Fifteenth Amendment. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to protect the voting rights of racial and ethnic minorities and provided federal oversight of election practices in states with a history of discrimination. This landmark legislation played a crucial role in ensuring that the Fifteenth Amendment's guarantees were upheld and expanded access to the ballot box for marginalized communities.
While the Fifteenth Amendment was an important step towards establishing voting rights for all citizens regardless of race, the struggle for equal access to the ballot box continues. Efforts to combat voter suppression, promote inclusivity, and protect voting rights remain ongoing to this day.
Learn more about Fifteenth Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/828993
#SPJ11
What are the different ways to create an ethical climate in the organization
Answer:
Important tools for building an ethical, inclusive organizational climate include core ideology, codes of ethics, preventing and eliminating destructive behaviors, fostering diversity, socializa- tion, and training.
Explanation:
credits :- wikipedia