Why does the Klan have resurgence on popularity in the early 1900s

Answer if its not to late lol A.it was divided:D

Explanation:

Answer:

Because of the many invasions, it is more appropriate to refer to the Middle Ages as the "Dark Ages." The period under consideration saw a number of invasions. The Vikings were a well-known group of invaders that came from Scandinavia. Then, after robbing villages and bringing their treasure home, they would return to their homeland. They killed and set fire to innocent peasants and townspeople, causing widespread devastation. As a consequence of these assaults, many people were left homeless and starving. Those who were lucky perished in battle. It was also common for Vikings to abduct and transport innocent people to their homelands, where they would be forced to work as slaves. Another reason why the Middle Ages should be referred to as the Dark Ages was war.

Explanation:

Sad times!!!

(130 words)

Clinton succeeded in getting a tax bill passed that placed more of the tax burden on the wealthy. His administration came closer to dealing with the problem of the exploding federal deficit than any other one did. At the same time the economy grew by leaps and bounds. He also got the family leave legislation passed, welfare reform, and an assault weapons banned which actually worked to some degree. Like all presidents, he was limited by his opposition from the opposing party.

Answer:

A tax plan that increased the burden of taxes on the wealthy was passed thanks to Clinton's efforts. The growing federal debt was an issue that his government got closer to solving than any other administration. The economy also experienced rapid expansion at the same time. Assault weapons were banned, poverty reform, and family leave laws were also approved thanks to him, and they all somewhat succeeded. He faced opposition from the opposing party, just like previous presidents, and this limited him.

Explanation:

Just reword this! Good luck! :)

Answer/Explanation:

The Battles of Lexington and Concord on 19 April 1775, the famous 'shot heard 'round the world', marked the start of the American War of Independence (1775-83). Politically disastrous for the British, it persuaded many Americans to take up arms and support the cause of independence.

The , who inhabited the ancient region between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, had a complex worldview that shaped their understanding of the purpose of human existence.

Their beliefs were influenced by their religious and cultural practices, which revolved around polytheistic worship and the concept of divine authority.

In Mesopotamian society, the purpose of human existence was closely tied to serving and appeasing the gods. They believed that humans were created by the gods to be their servants and to fulfill their will on Earth. It was believed that pleasing the gods through proper rituals, offerings, and obedience would lead to prosperity, protection, and favor from the divine realm.

Mesopotamians also saw human existence as inherently connected to the natural world and its cycles. They recognized the importance of agriculture, irrigation, and maintaining harmony with nature for the sustenance and well-being of their communities. Working the land and ensuring its fertility were considered vital tasks for the human inhabitants of Mesopotamia.

Additionally, Mesopotamians believed in an afterlife, where the souls of the deceased would continue to exist in a shadowy realm called the "Underworld" or "Land of No Return."

The purpose of human existence was also influenced by the belief that individuals needed to live righteous lives, obey societal norms, and fulfill their social and familial duties in order to secure a favorable afterlife.

It's important to note that Mesopotamian beliefs and understandings of the purpose of human existence evolved over time and varied across different city-states and periods within ancient Mesopotamia.

To know more about Mesopotamians refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31899601

#SPJ11

Colonization was a complex historical phenomenon that affected societies and cultures in different ways. The perspectives of the colonizers and the colonized were shaped by their experiences and perceptions. The colonizers believed they were superior and had a responsibility to civilize and modernize the colonized, while the colonized saw the colonizers as oppressors who were exploiting their resources and labor. The methods used to acquire and resist power varied, with the colonizers using violent and coercive methods and the colonized using armed, political, and cultural resistance.

Colonization is a historical phenomenon that has affected countries and societies in different ways. The perspectives of the colonizers and colonized vary based on their experiences and perceptions. While colonizers viewed colonization as an opportunity to expand their power and control over new territories, the colonized experienced exploitation and oppression. This discussion will explore the differences in perspectives, assumptions, and methods of acquiring and resisting power.

The perspective of the colonizers was that colonization was a means of civilizing and modernizing "uncivilized" societies. They viewed themselves as superior to the colonized and believed it was their responsibility to bring civilization to these societies. This perspective is evident in the writings of colonial administrators and officials. For example, Rudyard Kipling's poem "The White Man's Burden" portrays the colonizers' perception of their responsibility to "civilize" and "Christianize" the colonized.

On the other hand, the colonized experienced colonization as exploitation and oppression. They saw the colonizers as oppressors who were exploiting their resources and labor. The colonized saw themselves as victims of colonization and believed that their societies and cultures were being destroyed. This perspective is evident in the works of anti-colonial activists and writers such as Frantz Fanon. Fanon's book "The Wretched of the Earth" highlights the impact of colonization on the colonized and how it leads to psychological and physical violence.

The assumptions made by the two groups about each other were based on their perceptions and experiences. The colonizers assumed that the colonized were inferior and needed to be civilized. They believed that the colonized were incapable of governing themselves and that it was the responsibility of the colonizers to rule over them. The colonized, on the other hand, assumed that the colonizers were greedy and wanted to exploit their resources and labor. They saw the colonizers as oppressors who were interested in enriching themselves at the expense of the colonized.

The methods used by colonizers to acquire power were often violent and coercive. They used military force to conquer and subjugate the colonized. They also used economic power to control the resources and labor of the colonized. The colonized, on the other hand, used various methods to resist colonization. They used armed resistance, political resistance, and cultural resistance to resist colonization. Examples of these methods include the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the African National Congress, and the Rowlatt Satyagraha.

Learn more on colonization here;

https://brainly.com/question/1869200

#SPJ1

The Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa by  assault and torture in police custody, detention without charge or trial, and restriction orders.

The Apartheid laws affected the people of South Africa where the pass laws and Apartheid policies prohibited the Black people there from entering urban areas without immediately finding a job. However, it was illegal for a Black person not to carry a passbook.

Black people could not even marry white people. Also, in South Africa they could not even set up businesses in white areas. So, this way the  Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa.

Hence, Apartheid was a system of segregation and discrimination.

To learn more about the Apartheid laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/3860599

#SPJ1

These examples show Ender's resilience and resourcefulness when confronted with adult authority figures or older students, ultimately shaping him into the leader he becomes in the story. In the book "Ender's Game" by Orson Scott Card, there are several instances where Ender goes against an adult.

Here are three examples:

1. Ender vs. Colonel Graff: In Chapter 5, Ender is involved in a confrontation with Colonel Graff. Graff is manipulating Ender's situation to ensure that he is isolated from his peers and forced to rely on his own intelligence and resourcefulness. Ender is initially upset but later understands the rationale behind this tactic.

2. Ender vs. Bonzo Madrid: Although Bonzo is technically a fellow student at Battle School and not an adult, he is older and acts in an authoritative role. In Chapter 10, Ender confronts Bonzo, who is his commander in Salamander Army, about his harsh treatment and unreasonable restrictions. This confrontation eventually leads to a physical fight between the two, where Ender uses his intelligence to outmaneuver and defeat Bonzo.

3. Ender vs. Mazer Rackham: In Chapter 14, Ender is pitted against Mazer Rackham, a war hero, and an experienced fighter. Mazer serves as Ender's final instructor before the climactic battle against the alien Formics. Ender faces off against Mazer in simulated battles, where he is continuously challenged and pushed to his limits. These battles help prepare Ender for the final confrontation against the Formics.

To know more about Ender's Game visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15922421

#SPJ11

Based on a historical perspective, Lost achievements include territories, coins, and literacy. However, several things remained, such as the Latin language. They also created the Julian Calendar, which was commonly used until the eighteenth century.

Roman Empire is a term that is used to describe the post-Republican period of ancient Rome. Typically, Roman Empire included large territorial holdings around the Mediterranean Sea in Europe, North Africa, and Western Asia, and was ruled by emperors.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answers to the context of the questions include Territories, the Latin language, and Julian Calendar respectively.

Learn more about the Roman Empire here: https://brainly.com/question/1892495

#SPJ1

Answer:

Some of the drawbacks included air and water pollution and soil contamination that resulted in a significant deterioration of quality of life and life expectancy. Industrialization also exacerbated the separation of labor and capital.

Answer:

I do believe that it is 1 4 and 5

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation

I got this right on edu.. Give the dude above me praise I got here late

Answer:

Nazi Party

Explanation:

Answer:Adolf Hitler became involved with the fledgling German Workers Party – which he would later transform into the Nazi Party

Explanation:

Cited from Wikipedia.

Answer: There were 170 years in between

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can answer the following.

I can link this service of the Jesuits, Ursulines, Sulpicians, and Secular daughters of the Congrégation de Notre-Dame de Montréalto to one of the goals of the colony of New France. This goal was that French colonists wanted to evangelize the Native American Indians of North America in the Catholic religion. That is why they established missions in New France.

Two other important goals that French people had in the North American region were to transport French people from France to the colony of New France because there were already many people living in the European county. The other goal was to earn big money in the fur trade. This goal was very important, French people wanted to be rich with the fur trade.

Answer:

pierre

Explanation:

Answer:

Pierre :))))))

Explanation:

The party leader speaks for the party and helps facilitate agreement among its members.

For more such questions on Party leader:

https://brainly.com/question/28342969

#SPJ8

Answer:

Floor Leaders

Explanation:

Answer:

Someone tells or writes the story of the event.

Explanation:

In Foucha v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that defendants found NGRI (Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity) could not be held indefinitely in a mental hospital solely based on dangerousness.

In the case of Foucha v. Louisiana (1992), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether a defendant found NGRI could be held in a mental hospital beyond the point when they were no longer mentally disordered or dangerous. The Court ruled that once a defendant is no longer insane and does not pose a significant danger to themselves or others, they cannot be held in a mental hospital against their will.

The Court rejected the notion that dangerousness alone is a sufficient basis for continued hospitalization. Instead, the Court held that the confinement of NGRI acquittees should be based on the presence of a current mental disorder that requires treatment. It recognized that the purpose of such confinement is to provide treatment and not mere preventive detention. Therefore, defendants found NGRI can only be hospitalized for as long as they remain mentally disordered and in need of treatment, rather than solely based on their potential dangerousness.

The ruling in Foucha v. Louisiana reaffirmed the importance of individual liberty and the need for treatment-oriented approaches when dealing with defendants found NGRI. It emphasized that the focus should be on mental health treatment rather than continued confinement based on dangerousness alone.

Learn more about NGRI : brainly.com/question/17161419
#SPJ11

Answer:

The unprecedented levels of production in domestic manufacturing and commercial agriculture during this period greatly strengthened the American economy and reduced dependence on imports. The Industrial Revolution resulted in greater wealth and a larger population in Europe as well as in the United States.Explanation:

Answer: One effect of the industrial revolution in America is that the Industrial Revolution had greater wealth and also a large population in Europe as well as in the United States. I HOPE THIS HELPS :p

Explanation:

X, Y and Z was representatives of the French government sent to America to negotiate with the United States. The XYZ Affair was a diplomatic incident involving French and American diplomats that led to the Quasi-Conflict, a temporary undeclared war. The Convention of 1800, commonly referred to as the Treaty of Mortefontaine, was the result of negotiations between the United States and France.

What did XY and Z require in order for France to engage in negotiations with the US?

The French requested payment of a substantial Talleyrand bribe, an assumption and payment of American trade claims against the French, and a low-interest loan from the United States. The American envoys expressed amazement and doubt that any concessions would result in significant changes in French policy.

To know more about French representative, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/11844890

#SPJ13

Answer:

D: He brought knowledge

The of affect the course of texas history is: Access to the horse allowed the Comanche and other western nomadic Indians, like the Apache, to modernize their civilization and establish an empire that lasted until the 1880s.

Having successfully driven the Spanish out of New Mexico, they returned 12 years later to a changed power structure. Due to its role in preserving Pueblo cultural practices, lands, languages, and sovereignty, the Pueblo Revolt is a significant historical event.

Learn more about texas history: https://brainly.com/question/18004069

#SPJ4

Answer: Chinese and irish immigrants

Explanation:

The busing issue illustrated that America in the 1970s was racially divided and faced many challenges in its efforts to integrate schools. Busing issue is a transportation strategy used to assign children to schools outside their neighborhoods in order to achieve racial balance in schools.

During the 1970s, busing was used in several American cities to desegregate schools that had been racially divided for decades. During the 1970s, the use of busing to achieve integration in schools caused controversy and conflicts in many communities across the country. The busing issue exposed the deeply rooted racism in American society and highlighted the challenges that existed in trying to desegregate schools.

In some cities, parents were angry because their children were being sent to schools that were far from their homes. In addition, white parents in particular were worried that their children would be sent to schools with a majority of black students or vice versa .In conclusion, the busing issue in the 1970s demonstrated that America was racially divided and that there were many challenges to be faced in its efforts to integrate schools.

To learn more about  transportation visit here:

brainly.com/question/8141126

#SPJ11

Answer:

To establish rules throughout Africa And Europe.

Explanation:

Answer:

Stop the spread of American influences i think.

Explanation:

Sorry if I'm wrong.

Answer:

The Constitution says federal laws are "the supreme law of the land," so the federal government could just take complete control. Nothing in the Constitution says the federal government has power to limit peoples' freedoms in the first place. ... People won't know their leaders and will lose control over the government

Answer:

true, British harasment of american ships on what was consider american waters by the US helped start the war of 1812.

Answer: At the point when state law and government law strife, bureaucratic law dislodges, or appropriates, state law, because of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. For instance, the Voting Rights Act, a demonstration of Congress, seizes state constitutions, and FDA guidelines may acquire state court decisions in cases including professionally prescribed medications.

Explanation:

Answer: The U.S. government had fears about Guatemalan President Jacobo Arbenz Guzman because they believed he was a communist sympathizer and that his government was supporting leftist groups in the region. The U.S. government also had concerns about Arbenz's land reform policies, which sought to redistribute land to peasant farmers, as some of the affected land belonged to U.S. companies such as the United Fruit Company. The CIA orchestrated a coup against him in 1954, as part of a covert operation called "Operation PBSUCCESS," which was authorized by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower. The U.S. government believed that removing Arbenz from power was necessary to protect U.S. interests in the region and prevent the spread of communism in Latin America.

Explanation: