Answers
The Senate and the House of Representatives are each a separate chamber of Congress. Typically, the top and lower chambers are referred to as the House and the Senate, respectively.
Why do the two houses of Congress have different representations?Members of the House represent particular districts, whereas senators represent their entire states. The population of a state determines how many districts it has. There is a minimum of one representative from each state in Congress. As institutions, the House and the Senate have developed very differently.
Why are the numbers of members in each House different?The two senators that each state sends to the U.S. Senate serve as its representatives. However, a state's population is what determines how many representatives it has in the House of Representatives. Larger states like California, for instance, have 53 representatives, but smaller states like Vermont and Delaware only have one.
To know more about two chambers of Congress visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/24180994
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Do you think the Pennsylvania system of prisons was too cruel or harsh or could modern prisons benefit from revisiting this early system? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:I do think the Pennsylvania system was too harsh. They was criticized for being too costly because they wanted to focus on solitary confinement. They was also criticized for the inmates physical and mental health because of solitary confinement as well. It seem as if they was going off a method of being a workshop. The system was even impractical. I don’t think modern prisons would be able to benefit off this system. While it’s true that prisons are making money off the amount of inmates, mental help should be offered as well. Physical help should be offered too. I’ve seen plenty of stories where inmates would die from their injuries in prison and no physical help is given such as fighting or even a female inmate giving birth.
Explanation:
What national organization in America has done most to defend America against acts of terror, and how do you determine this?
Answers
Answer:
an organization chartered by act of the U.SExplanation:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the national organization in America that has done the most to defend against acts of terror. This is determined by the fact that DHS was created after the 9/11 attacks to lead a unified national effort to secure America against terrorism. DHS is responsible for protecting the country from both domestic and foreign threats, including cybersecurity attacks, natural disasters, and terrorism. The department works closely with federal, state, and local partners to coordinate and implement initiatives to prevent, protect against, and respond to terrorist acts.How is poverty related to other social problems, such as discrimination, immigration and crime?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Children growing up in poverty are less likely to graduate high school or go to college, and they are more likely to commit street crime. People living in poverty might also migrate in hopes for a better life, some people even do it illegally. They also might be discriminated to ,since they don't have the privilege to wear the best clothes or be the most hygienic. They are also more likely to have several kinds of family problems, including divorce and family conflict
true/false. a breach law is one that specifies a requirement for an organization to notify affected parties when they detect the loss of a specified type of information.
Answers
False. A breach law stipulates that when an entity discovers the loss of a specific type of information, they must notify the parties who may be impacted.
If an organization experiences a specific kind of loss of information, they are required by law to notify the parties who may be impacted. The CISO of a corporation is the advocate for data security within the company.
The incumbent of this position is in charge of developing the policies and strategies to protect data from threats and vulnerabilities as well as the reaction strategy in case the worst case scenario occurs.
Technology for data security examples include data deletion, data masking, and backups. Encryption, which encrypts digital data, software/hardware, and hard drives, is a crucial data security technology measure.
Learn more about breach law Visit: brainly.com/question/30161008
#SPJ4
An officer enters a home by lying to the home owner by saying she has a search warrant. The owner of the home was never shown the warrant and the officer finds drug paraphernalia and a small baggie of cocaine. They arrest the owner of the home. In court, the owner of the home asks that the evidence not be admitted due to the false warrant. What would the Supreme Court rule? Which case provides precedent for this situation that falls under the 4th Amendment? I Need help
Answers
answer:
the supreme court would most likely deem that based on the fact that a law enforment officer forced entry into your home and lied saying that they had a warrant, that, that was a unreasonable search and seizure under the law.
explanation:
the police may knock and announce their presence at your door but unless they have a warrant, you are not required to open the door, to answer any questions, or to cooperate with the police in any fashion.
(source: libertylaw.ca)
"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,"
"no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
(source: constitution of united states of america 1789 *revised in 1992*)
"the fourth amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government"
"however, not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law."
(source: uscourts.gov)
so
the supreme court would most likely deem that based on the fact that a law enforment officer forced entry into your home and lied saying that they had a warrant, that, that was a "unreasonable" "search and seizure" "under the law."
What are the powers of Congress, described in Article I of the U.S.
Constitution?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; ArtI. S8.
what is the difference between the first and second woyane movement
Answers
Answer; The Woyane rebellion (Tigrinya: ቀዳማይ ወያነ) was an uprising in Tigray Province, Ethiopia against the centralization process from the government of Emperor Haile Selassie which took place in May–November 1943.[3][2] The rebels called themselves the Woyane, a name borrowed from a game played locally between competing groups of young men from different villages, which connoted a spirit of resistance and unity.[4] After nearly succeeding in overrunning the whole province, the rebels were defeated with the support of aircraft from the United Kingdom's Royal Air Force.[5][6] Out of all the rebellions that engulfed Ethiopia during Haile Selassie's rule, this was the most serious internal threat that he faced.[7]
hope it's helpful to you please rate me
Define the elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment and explain what they mean.
Determine why the founding fathers included a provision in the Bill of Rights pertaining to search and seizure.
Consider DUI checkpoints. Should DUI checkpoints be legal given the provisions of search and seizure as defined by the Bill of Rights?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The elements of this amendment are:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effectsAgainst unreasonable searches and seizuresShall not be violatedWarrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The founding fathers included this provision in the Bill of Rights because they believed that individual liberties, including privacy, were important and needed protection from the government.
Regarding DUI checkpoints, the legality of these checkpoints is a matter of debate and has been challenged in court. The Supreme Court has ruled that DUI checkpoints are constitutional as long as they are reasonable and minimally intrusive. However, this is a complex issue and the specific circumstances of each checkpoint must be evaluated to determine whether it violates the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Example:
Let's consider the following example to understand the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Imagine that a police officer suspects that a particular person is involved in drug trafficking. The officer wants to search the person's house for evidence. However, without a warrant, the search would be considered an unreasonable one and would violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
To obtain a warrant, the officer must show probable cause that the person is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of that activity can be found in the person's house. The warrant must also describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. In this case, the warrant would specify the address of the person's house and the items the officer is looking for, such as drugs, drug paraphernalia, or money related to drug sales.
If the warrant is properly obtained, the search is considered reasonable and the evidence found can be used in court. However, if the warrant is not based on probable cause or does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, the evidence found during the search may be considered inadmissible in court.
In the context of DUI checkpoints, a similar analysis would be performed to determine whether the checkpoint is reasonable and minimally intrusive, and whether it meets the Fourth Amendment's requirements. The specific circumstances, such as the location, time, and duration of the checkpoint, would be considered to determine if the checkpoint is reasonable and does not violate an individual's constitutional rights.
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. If you have any additional questions, please let me know or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment relate to the protection of individuals from oppressive government searches and seizures. The founding fathers included a clause in the Bill of Rights on this subject for the protection of citizens and for the protection of the inherent freedoms of man.
What are the freedoms of law?It corresponds to a series of characteristics arranged in the universal declaration of rights that aims to protect man and his rights to social and civil freedom, that is, the possibility of not being oppressed, violated or suffering any threat to his integrity.
Therefore, the US Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, DUI verification being legal and determined by its reasonableness and examination of the circumstances.
Find out more about Search and Seizure on:
https://brainly.com/question/30280195
#SPJ1
What are the Essential Parts of a Written Constitution? Briefly explain each
Answers
Answer:
The constitution is the central legal document of a state. It regulates the basic organizational structure of the state, the territorial structure of the state, the relationship with its constituent states and with other states, as well as the relationship with those subject to norms and their most important rights and obligations. The state powers constituted in this way are bound by the constitution as the supreme norm and their power over the norm is limited. The constitution-making power in democratic states comes from the people of the state. Constitutions usually also contain state tasks and objectives, these are often found in a preamble.
Miranda rights are required when:
a. a suspect is being booked.
b. a suspect is being questioned.
c. a suspect is being arrested.
d. a suspect is in custody and being questioned.
Answers
Answer:
d. a suspect is in custody and being questioned.
Which statement would the author of the passage most
likely agree with?
Passage:
3. The Patriot Act updated the law to reflect new technologies and new threats. The Act brought the law up to date with current technology, so we no longer have to fight a digital-age battle with antique weapons-legal authorities leftover from the era of rotary telephones. When investigating the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, for example, law enforcement used one of the Act's new
authorities to use high-tech means to identify and locate
some of the killers.
-"The USA PATRIOT Act:
Preserving Life and Liberty,"
Department of Justice
✓ The Patriot Act is essential to the United States'
efforts to combat terrorism.
O The Patriot Act is essential to the United States'
efforts to combat war.
O The Patriot Act is needed to help the United States
protect privacy rights.
O The Patriot Act is needed to help the United States
protect suspects' rights.
A is the correct answer! :)
Answers
Answer:
THANK YOU IF IT IS "A"....<3333
Explanation:
According to the passage, the correct option is A. The Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism.
The passage states that the Patriot Act updated the law to reflect new technologies and new threats. The Act was reportedly used to look into the killing of Wall Street Journal writer Daniel Pearl, according to the document. This implies that the Patriot Act is a powerful weapon in the battle against terrorism in the author's eyes.
Therefore, the author of the passage would most likely agree with the statement that the Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism. Hence, Option A. is correct.
Learn more about the Patriot Act, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11306077
#SPJ5
How does a quasi contract differ from an express or an implied contract? What areplain meaning laws / rules?
Answers
A quasi contract is a legal concept that arises when there is no actual contract between the parties, but one party has received a benefit from the other party, which would be unjust for them to keep without compensating the other party. In a quasi contract, there is no mutual agreement or intention to create a legal relationship.
On the other hand, an express contract is created when the parties explicitly state the terms and conditions of their agreement, either orally or in writing. An implied contract, however, is created when the parties' actions suggest an intention to be bound by a contract, even if the terms are not explicitly stated.
Plain meaning laws or rules are principles used in legal interpretation. They suggest that the words of a contract should be given their ordinary and plain meaning, as understood by the average person. This means that the court should not look beyond the actual words used in the contract to interpret its meaning. These laws/rules help ensure clarity and predictability in contractual agreements.
In summary, a quasi contract is different from an express or implied contract as it does not require mutual agreement, while express and implied contracts involve a clear intention to create a legal relationship. Plain meaning laws/rules guide the interpretation of contract terms based on their ordinary and plain meaning.
Know more about quasi contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/30811453
#SPJ11
why structural functionalism a major perspective on deviance and crime
-sociology
Answers
Answer:i dont know really
Explanation:
Champion Hospital retains Hall, Hall and Hall, a law firm, to perform all of its legal work, including representation during medical malpractice lawsuits. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct? A) The law firm is not a business associate because it is a legal, not a medical, organization. B) The law firm is a business associate because it performs activities on behalf of the hospital. C) The law firm is a business associate because it uses or discloses individually identifiable health information on behalf of the hospital. D) The law firm is not a business associate because the privacy rule prohibits it from using individually identifiable information. E) a and d
Answers
B) The law firm is a business associate because it performs activities on behalf of the hospital. Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, a business associate is any person or organization that performs activities or functions on behalf of a covered entity (such as a hospital) that involve the use or disclosure of protected health information (PHI). As the law firm is performing legal work on behalf of the hospital, it meets the definition of a business associate.
In this scenario, Hall, Hall and Hall is a law firm retained by Champion Hospital to perform legal work, which involves the use or disclosure of PHI during medical malpractice lawsuits. Therefore, statement B is correct - the law firm is a business associate because it performs activities on behalf of the hospital that involve the use or disclosure of PHI. Statement A is incorrect because being a legal organization does not exempt the law firm from being considered a business associate. Statement C is correct because the use or disclosure of PHI is a key criterion for determining whether an entity is a business associate. Statement D is incorrect because the Privacy Rule does not prohibit law firms from using PHI, but it does require them to protect it appropriately. Statement E is incorrect because statement D is incorrect.
Learn more about business here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826771
#SPJ11
A type of antisocial behavior is stalking. It generally involves the following behaviors except:
a. Making verbal threats to the intended victim or a family member
b. Making threatening or harassing phone calls or hang-ups
C. Sending unwanted love notes, flowers, and gifts after being told not to
d. It is restricted to the famous
Answers
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answers
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
Fifteen-year-old Tanya entered an 'apprenticeship' contract for three years which required her to train 12 hours a day, seven days a week and perform only in shows arranged by Ramona, a famous ballet teacher. In return, Ramona promised to provide Tanya with room and board and £25 a week spending money. Ramona had an option to renew the contract for another three years. When she turned 17, Tanya took up a part-time position as a cheerleader for a basketball club and this caused her to miss some lessons and ballet performances. Ramona sued Tanya for breach of her contract of service. Advise Tanya whether Ramona is likely to succeed in your jurisdiction.
Answers
The advise that should be given to Tanya in this situation is the fact that she cannot be sued by Ramona due to the fact that the contract can be considered as a voidable one.
What is a voidable contract?
This a contract that was entered between two parties that may not be enforceable due to several existing legal reasons.
This contract is voidable due to the age of Tanya. She was 15 when she entered the contract. This age is considered as a minor age.
Read more on contracts here: https://brainly.com/question/984979
What are the two key properties of eye
witness testimony
Answers
Answer:
Wells says eyewitness testimony has two key properties: one, it's often unreliable; and two, it is highly persuasive to jurors.
Khi tư vấn các vụ việc về tài sản của vợ chồng, người tư vấn cần phải nắm vững những vấn đề gì? Vận dụng các kỹ năng tư vấn ra sao?
Answers
Answer:
Please write english I don't understand vietnamese word
Explanation:
When carrying three or more passengers under the age if 21, your risk of being killed in a crash
Answers
When carrying three or more passengers under the age of 21, your risk of being killed in a crash increases.
This is because the presence of passengers can be a distraction to the driver and can increase the likelihood of risky driving behavior such as speeding, tailgating, or not using seat belts. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), teen drivers are particularly at risk of being involved in a fatal crash when carrying passengers.
In fact, the risk of a fatal crash increases by 44% when a teenage driver has one passenger under the age of 21 in the car, and it increases exponentially with each additional passenger. It is important for drivers, particularly young drivers, to limit the number of passengers in the car to reduce the risk of a crash and to always practice safe driving habits.
To know more about crash here
https://brainly.com/question/14840055
#SPJ4
Which jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law?
Answers
Answer:
Harvard law school
Explanation:
As the Historical jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law.
What is a law?In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts.
It is possible to think of this school as the school of the evolutionary process. Its emphasis is still on the development and history of the legal system. it holds that prior laws and rulings will continue to be valid in the present and the future.
Therefore, As a result, By the historic school of thought relies the most on precedent in establishing law
Learn more about the law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ6
True or false
In order for people to get what they heed and want they have to break
work.
Answers
Answer:
the answer is false not true
What is the nature of goodness in the context of filipino values?
Answers
Answer:
Good traditional Filipino values
Enumeration of Filipino values
Family orientation.
Joy and humor.
Flexibility, adaptability, and creativity.
Religious adherence.
Ability to survive.
Hard work and industriousness.
Hospitality.
Explanation: Hope that this helps!!
Job is convinced that if he could only have the opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judging the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent.
true/false
Answers
The given statement, "Job is convinced that if he could be given opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judged the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent," is True.
God believes Job is humble and devout. Satan, however, challenges God, saying that Job is virtuous and moral only because God blessed him with good fortune.
Satan bets God that if Job experiences suffering, his devotion will falter, and he will curse God. However, after a series of disasters strike Job, he still does not curse God. But when he is struck with a horrible skin disease. Three of Job's friends arrive to comfort him, and Job finally questions the injustice done to him.
His friends entice him to challenge God's will. They suggest that his misfortune is probably a result of some sin he committed. Job replies that, 'he is innocent and pleads for a fair hearing from God.'
For more details on the Book of Job, visit: https://brainly.com/question/20379041
#SPJ11
why do we call the Legislative Branch “the branch of you?
Answers
Answer: Laws are made for US to follow and to keep OUR community, family, and our country safe.
Explanation:
Concern exist whatever personally identifiable information or other sensitive information is collected and stored-in digital form or otherwise
Answers
exist wherever personally identifiable information or other sensitive information is collected and stored – in digital form or otherwise. Improper or non-existent disclosure control can be the root cause for privacy issues.
please give me brainliest only if it's right!! ☺️
TOPIC
You are assigned to a walking beat downtown, and every
morning you stop into a breakfast shop and have a cup of
coffee only. The owner does not charge you. After some
citizen complaints about the parking situation in the area,
the station has directed you to ticket all illegally parked
cars. As you are tagging the cars in front of the breakfast
shop, the owner comes out furious and asks what are you
doing? He states rather loudly, "I give you free coffee every
day and this is how you repay me"?
• How would you respond?
•
• Was there an implied consent that the free coffee
would be reimbursed by granting favors to the owner?
On a larger scale, could this lead to a perception of
corruption of the officer looked the other way or
warned customers that if they were parked illegally
and didn't move their cars they would be ticketed?
• What would be a solution to this issue?
Answers
In this case, I would respond by saying that giving free breakfast can be considered as a generous effort by the shop owner but it can never mean an implied consent for grant of favors.
Moreover, this could very well be perceived as corruption by the officers as they leave people without tickets despite illegally parking the vehicles and the grant of favors like the shop owner would also amount to bribery and corruption.
A viable solution to issue would be to make a rule to post proper advertisements about the penalty for illegal parking should be done. These advertisements would act as awareness as well as warning for people and then officers don't need to be lenient on people who still break the rules. This way, the issue of corruption allegations and illegal parking both can be resolved together.
To know more about Corruption:
brainly.com/question/15270178
#SPJ1
saving is important
Answers
Answer:
yes I agree
Explanation:
very smart very intelligent
A cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in your bank in Italy. What documents would you require him to do it? Imagine that the trader explains his business in detail, and he says that he buys cryptocurrency online and sells them for more money to make a profit. He has financial statements; ha pays taxes and has all of this in the rule. Do you think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes? Would you open the account to him?
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
If a cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in my bank in Italy, I would be very strict in order to proceed with his request. I would double-check the present legislation in Italy regarding Anti-money Laundering and all the laws regarding international finance and banking transactions. And do not want to have any problems with the law.
The documents I would require him to provide are the legal constitution of his company in a real country, not in the so-called "fiscal paradises" such as Andorra. He would have to provide me with all the documents that prove he runs a legal business and I would take these documents to the legal department of the bank to prove and certify them.
I would also ask my assistant to personally check on the web or public criminal records to know if the ma's company has had any problems in the past that had affected his reputation.
I would ask him to explain his business in detail, with the presence of an expert in the cryptocurrency business. I would require a copy of the company's financial statements, his taxes, and proof that he has no debt. He needs to prove that all the documents are in perfect rule.
Yes, I think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes because that is the nature of the cryptocurrency business. It has not been regulated by any government in the world. That is the reason why almost no bank in the world or country accepts cryptocurrency as normal currency. It is so volatile. Indeed, nobody regulates cryptocurrency. And the proof is the thew bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies change their value on a daily basis.
I would think twice about accepting opening the account to hi, It is risky to the first degree.
during the late 1800s, a new group of reformers known as the ________ began to advocate instituting a juvenile court to deal with youth problems.
Answers
During the late 1800s, a new group of reformers known as the "child savers" began to advocate for the creation of a separate juvenile court system to deal with youth problems.
Prior to this time, children who committed crimes were often treated the same as adults and were subject to harsh punishments, including imprisonment and even execution. The child savers believed that children who committed crimes should be treated differently than adults and that the focus should be on rehabilitation rather than punishment.
The first juvenile court was established in Cook County, Illinois in 1899. The court was designed to be more informal than adult courts, with a focus on counseling, education, and rehabilitation. The goal was to address the underlying causes of delinquent behavior and provide troubled youth with the support and resources they needed to get back on track.
Over the years, the juvenile court system has evolved and expanded to include a wide range of programs and services, including probation, counseling, and alternative sentencing options. Today, the juvenile court system is an important part of the criminal justice system, providing a second chance for young people who have made mistakes and helping to prevent future delinquency.
To know more about justice system
https://brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ11