Why do you think Jim Crow laws continued in the south for so long?

Proslavery supporters from out of state invaded Kansas, seeking to control the election through fraud and intimidation.

The struggle to win Kansas during the mid-19th century was marked by intense conflict between proslavery and antislavery factions. To address the statements provided:

The first statement, "provided an excellent example of how the legal and orderly implementation of popular sovereignty might take place," is not accurate. Popular sovereignty, the idea that the residents of a territory should decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote, was proposed as a solution to the slavery issue. However, the implementation of popular sovereignty in Kansas was far from orderly or legal. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which introduced popular sovereignty, led to a violent struggle known as "Bleeding Kansas." Both proslavery and antislavery supporters engaged in acts of violence and fraud, undermining any notion of a legal and orderly process.

The second statement, "got no support from the presidential administration of Millard Fillmore," is partially true. Millard Fillmore served as the President of the United States from 1850 to 1853, preceding the events in Kansas. However, the struggle in Kansas occurred during the presidency of Franklin Pierce, who succeeded Fillmore. While Fillmore did not directly involve himself in the Kansas conflict, his administration had pursued policies that aimed to maintain the delicate balance between the North and South on the slavery issue, such as the Compromise of 1850.

The third statement, "from out of state invaded Kansas, to control the election through fraud and intimidation," is accurate. During the struggle for Kansas, proslavery supporters from neighboring states, particularly Missouri, crossed the border into Kansas to influence the outcome of the elections. They engaged in acts of fraud, intimidation, and voter suppression to ensure that Kansas would be admitted to the Union as a slave state.

The fourth statement, "saw that the cause was lost and retreated from the contest," is not entirely accurate. The proslavery supporters did not retreat from the contest entirely. Despite setbacks, the proslavery faction continued their efforts to maintain control in Kansas. However, the eventual victory of the antislavery forces and the passage of the Kansas Constitution in 1859, which prohibited slavery, marked a turning point in the struggle.

Overall, the struggle for Kansas was a tumultuous period marked by violence, fraud, and intense competition between proslavery and antislavery factions. The conflict in Kansas played a significant role in the lead-up to the American Civil War.

Know more about Implementations here:

https://brainly.com/question/32181414

#SPJ11

In regards to Hamilton vs Jefferson, the answers are given below;

Who :  Alexander Hamilton  and Thomas Jefferson,

When : In the 1790s

Where : A debate in the 1790s  between Antifederalists and federalists

What : A debate over Bank of the United States.

Why : Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed on how to interpret the Constitution and the role of the Federal Reserve Bank.

The establishment of banks was not given to the national government by the Constitution. The final point of contention between Hamilton and Jefferson regarding the bank was whether or not it was constitutional. Congress rejected Jefferson and his supporters' arguments and enacted the Bank Bill in February 1791.

Alexander Hamilton rose to prominence among the Federalists who advocated for a robust federal government. Thomas Jefferson, a Republican, fought against this, saying that having too much authority in the hands of the central government would result in tyranny.

Therefore, According to Jefferson, the provision implied that Congress should only adopt the essential measures and nothing more. In order to pay off Revolutionary War debt, establish a single national currency, and boost the economy, Hamilton suggested that the United States construct a national bank in 1791.

Learn more about Hamilton vs Jefferson from

https://brainly.com/question/849639

#SPJ1

Answer:

miditerranean sea is this answer

Many Social Darwinists embraced laissez-faire capitalism and racism. They believed that government should not interfere in the “survival of the fittest” by helping the poor, and promoted the idea that some races are biologically superior to others.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

who are the people? you can't ask for help without the names because it makes no sense now, or no one can answer it.

Explanation:

Answer:

Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyal left Tibet to establish a new base in western Bhutan, founding Cheri Monastery at the head of Thimphu valley.

Explanation:

Answer:

B) humanism

Explanation:

A major characteristic of the Renaissance was the revival of Classical learning and wisdom, Classical here meaning the Greek arts and learnings (and to a lesser extent the Roman arts and learning).

Answer:

Explanation:

35

Answer:

B. refused the territories' independence.

Explanation:

China 's desire to annex Taiwan and securely cling on to its control of Tibet is direct proof of China's interventionist ambitions. Chinese government deliberately avoids ethnic minorities or other cultures in their official policies. It fosters the One China agenda of the government. There is a long history of autonomy in Tibet, but China refused to accept it and still exert control over it. Although the independence of Taiwan is still not accepted by China, Taiwan has an autonomous government system and foreign relations.

Answer:

Hamilton thought it was too unnecessary. Many of the land/territory may not be used because of how vast it was. Also, Jefferson was sort of a hypocrite. He had a strict view of the constitution and believed that the president didn't have any powers that weren't implied in the Constitution. Buying foreign land wasn't in the Constitution, yet Jefferson still tried to make the Louisiana Purchase by buying it from France. Also, the Louisiana Purchase may seem unconstitutional and there would be too much land to govern.

Answer:

The League of Nations was formed to prevent a repetition of the First World War, but within two decades this effort failed. Economic depression, renewed nationalism, weakened successor states, and feelings of humiliation (particularly in Germany) eventually contributed to World War II.

Explanation:

Answer:

Scarcity is one of the key concepts of economics. It means that the demand for a good or service is greater than the availability of the good or service. Therefore, scarcity can limit the choices available to the consumers who ultimately make up the economy.

Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sex in education programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance, ensuring equal opportunities for both male and female students.

Title IX is a landmark legislation that has had a significant impact on education in the United States. It prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any educational institution or program that receives federal funding. The law covers a wide range of educational activities, including admissions, recruitment, scholarships, athletics, and more.

The main goal of Title IX is to ensure equal opportunities for both male and female students in education. It promotes gender equity by prohibiting practices that limit or deny educational opportunities based on sex. Title IX requires educational institutions to provide equal resources, facilities, and opportunities for all students, regardless of their gender.

Title IX has had a transformative effect on education by promoting gender equality and opening up opportunities for women in various fields, including sports. It has led to increased participation of women in athletics, improved access to educational programs, and the development of policies and procedures to address instances of sex discrimination.

In summary, Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 plays a crucial role in promoting gender equality in education by prohibiting sex-based discrimination and ensuring equal opportunities for all students.

Learn more about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 here:

https://brainly.com/question/30806459

#SPJ11

Answer:

\(\huge\red\bigstar\underline{\underline{\fbox{\red{answer}}}} \)

1869: ᴛʜᴇ ᴛᴇʀʀɪᴛᴏʀʏ ᴏꜰ ᴡʏᴏᴍɪɴɢ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ᴛᴏ ɢʀᴀɴᴛ ᴜɴʀᴇꜱᴛʀɪᴄᴛᴇᴅ ꜱᴜꜰꜰʀᴀɢᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴡᴏᴍᴇɴ. 1869: ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴜꜰꜰʀᴀɢᴇ ᴍᴏᴠᴇᴍᴇɴᴛ ꜱᴘʟɪᴛꜱ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴡᴏᴍᴀɴ ꜱᴜꜰꜰʀᴀɢᴇ ᴀꜱꜱᴏᴄɪᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀᴍᴇʀɪᴄᴀɴ ᴡᴏᴍᴀɴ ꜱᴜꜰꜰʀᴀɢᴇ ᴀꜱꜱᴏᴄɪᴀᴛɪᴏɴ. ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴡꜱᴀ ɪꜱ ꜰᴏʀᴍᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴇʟɪᴢᴀʙᴇᴛʜ ᴄᴀᴅʏ ꜱᴛᴀɴᴛᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴜꜱᴀɴ ʙ

Answer:

Because the geography of the various regions were different, life in those regions became different. Separate and unique cultures developed.

Explanation:

For example, shelter was built using materials from surroundings. Climate, natural resources and personal differences all impacted the development of culture.

Answer:

Fue Secretario de Educación Pública entre 1943 y 1946, promovió la Campaña Nacional contra el Analfabetismo, creó el Instituto de Capacitación del Magisterio, organizó la Comisión Revisora de Planes y Programas, inició la Biblioteca Enciclopédica Popular, dirigió el valioso compendio México y la cultura

Answer:

The power of words is the main idea of the house on mango street.

Answer:

no way no way no way no way nnnnnnnnoooooo wwwweaaaaaayyyy

Sport served as a fraternal epoxy in the period of nation-building by fostering a sense of unity, identity, and camaraderie among individuals, while partisanship played a role in shaping the rivalries and loyalties associated with different sports teams.

Sport has long been recognized as a unifying force, bringing people together across various social and cultural divides. During the period of nation-building, sport played a crucial role in creating a shared national identity by providing a platform for collective experiences and celebrations. Sporting events and competitions allowed individuals to rally around a common cause, instilling a sense of pride and belonging in the nation.

However, partisanship also played a significant role in this process. Partisanship refers to the strong allegiance and loyalty individuals hold towards a particular team or sports organization. This allegiance often stems from regional, cultural, or historical affiliations. Partisanship added an element of rivalry and competition to sports, fueling passions and intensifying the sense of identity and belonging. The competition between different teams or fan bases created a sense of camaraderie among supporters and further solidified the bond within the nation.

To know more about epoxy, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/31597386

#SPJ4

------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

"How and why did sport serve as a fraternal epoxy in this period of nation-building? What role did partisanship play in this regard?"-----------

Under the Securities Act of 1933, the burden of proof that the plaintiff sustained a loss must be proven by the plaintiff.

Option B is correct

The Securities Act of 1933 is a federal law that regulates the issuance and sale of securities in the United States.

The law requires companies that offer or sell securities to the public to provide full and fair disclosure of all material information about the securities being offered. If a plaintiff brings a lawsuit under the Securities Act of 1933, they must prove that they suffered a loss as a result of a material misstatement or omission in the offering materials. The defendant may present evidence to rebut the plaintiff's claims, but ultimately, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to show that they sustained a loss.

Option B is correct

To know more about plaintiff Here

https://brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ4

Answer: peru

Explanation:

Answer:PERU

Explanation:

It was originally used for warfare by the Song Dynasty. It was only ever used as a weapon to harm other people.

The myth of California religious life in the nineteenth century was that it was laid back. Option 4 is correct.

The myth of California religious life in the nineteenth century as being laid back can be attributed to a few factors. Firstly, the Gold Rush brought in a diverse mix of people from different regions and cultures, leading to a more relaxed approach to religion. Secondly, the state's location on the west coast allowed for a mixing of Eastern and Western philosophies, leading to a more relaxed and eclectic approach to spirituality.

Additionally, the natural beauty of California may have also contributed to a more laid-back approach to religion, with an emphasis on spiritual connection to nature. While there were certainly strict religious communities in California during this time, the overall perception of the state's religious life was that it was more relaxed and open-minded.

Option 4 holds true.

The complete question:

The myth of California religious life in the nineteenth century was that it was:

Learn more about myth: https://brainly.com/question/3751200

#SPJ11

The most important cause of the political debate over states' rights in the first half of the 1800s was the issue of slavery. The question of whether new states being admitted to the Union should allow slavery or not created a deep divide between the North and the South. The South believed that states had the right to determine their own policies regarding slavery, while the North believed that the federal government had the power to regulate slavery. This issue eventually led to the American Civil War and the end of slavery in the United States.

The United States became involved in Latin America primarily to protect economic and security interests.

This era of US involvement in Latin America is often referred to as the "Banana Wars" period, as the US intervened militarily in several countries in Central America and the Caribbean to protect American business interests, particularly those of the United Fruit Company, which was a major producer and exporter of bananas.

The US also sought to establish political and military dominance in the region, citing concerns over European colonization and influence, as well as the spread of communism during the Cold War. While there were some efforts to promote economic development and improve living standards, these initiatives were often secondary to US interests in the region.

Learn more about United States here:

https://brainly.com/question/8147900

#SPJ11

The chart wars fought by Romans between 500-100 BCE were driven by the expansionist ambitions of the Roman Republic and the desire for territorial control and resources. These wars marked a significant period of Roman expansion.

During this time, the Roman Republic sought to expand its influence and secure its borders against external threats. The Romans aimed to establish control over the Italian Peninsula and expand into other regions, including Gaul (modern-day France), Iberia (modern-day Spain and Portugal), and parts of North Africa. This expansion was driven by a combination of factors, such as the desire for strategic control of key trade routes, access to valuable resources, and the need to protect Rome's growing population and interests. The chart wars were also influenced by conflicts with various neighboring peoples and states. The Romans faced challenges from the Etruscans in central Italy, the Samnites in the south, and the Celts in the north. These conflicts arose due to territorial disputes, cultural differences, and competing interests. Additionally, Rome's military success in previous wars, such as the conquest of Veii in 396 BCE, further fueled its ambitions and emboldened its leaders to pursue further expansion.

Furthermore, the chart wars can be seen as part of a larger historical context of Mediterranean power struggles. The Romans encountered other major powers of the time, including Carthage in the Punic Wars. These conflicts were driven by a mix of political, economic, and strategic considerations, with both sides vying for dominance in the region. The chart wars provided the Romans with valuable military experience and resources, laying the foundation for their eventual dominance in the Mediterranean.

In conclusion, the historical circumstances that led to the chart wars fought by Romans between 500-100 BCE were a combination of Rome's expansionist ambitions, the need to secure borders, conflicts with neighboring peoples, and larger power struggles in the Mediterranean region. These wars played a pivotal role in the growth and consolidation of Roman power, setting the stage for the establishment of the Roman Empire in the following centuries.

To learn more about Romans, click here :
brainly.com/question/5044884
#SPJ11

Answer:

obviously A

Explanation:

It is A because since the AOC had very little power, and some examples are like it had no power to tax and also no national court system, americans believed that the nation wouldn't really strive well if there was so much flaws in a form of government.