Why did the professional field of paralegals develop?
O Legal secretaries trained paralegals to help with their overload.
O The paperwork for lawyers alone caused this field to increase.
O In the 1970s, lawyers had no one to assist in executing legal work.
O During the Vietnam War, people took an interest in legal matters, resulting in an increase of paralegals.

Analyzing the state's law will be the application of the rules that can differentiate the rules of law. In this scenario, without specific information about the choice of law rules in each relevant jurisdiction, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, I can provide some general principles that may help in making the determination.

Typically, courts apply the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the case. Given the information provided, let's analyze each option:

a. Texas law should apply to the case because that is where the injury occurred.

This option suggests that the law of the state where the injury occurred should apply. While the injury happened in Texas, it does not necessarily mean that Texas law automatically applies.

b. Oklahoma law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was made.

This option suggests that the law of the state where the contract was made should apply. If the contract between Charlotte Chambers and  Charter was formed in Oklahoma, it could be argued that Oklahoma law should apply.

c. New Mexico law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was performed.

This option suggests that the law of the state where the contract was performed should apply. If the primary purpose of the contract was transportation to and from New Mexico for the basketball tournament, it could be argued that New Mexico law should apply.

d. Louisiana law should apply to the case because Charter is a Louisiana corporation.

This option suggests that the law of the state where the defendant corporation is incorporated should apply. If  Charter is indeed a Louisiana corporation, it could be argued that Louisiana law should apply. However, the law of the state of incorporation does not always automatically govern all aspects of a case.

To know more about state law

brainly.com/question/12469633

#SPJ4

No, Alcohol-related laws exist enforced by State and local law enforcement agencies.

Local law enforcement exists described as a law enforcement agency that exists on a municipal, county, tribal, or regional level. These agencies utilize personnel who aid in enforcing the laws of the states and country. Officers have the power to maintain firearms and create arrests to uphold the law. Law enforcement agencies enforce laws concerning their manufacture, import, sale, possession, and use. Alcohol-related laws exist enforced by State and local law enforcement

Local police usually retain jurisdiction over crimes within that city, sheriffs maintain jurisdiction over the county, state troopers include jurisdiction over state roads and state-wide crimes, and federal policing agencies include jurisdiction over federal-level crimes.

A law enforcement agency (LEA) exists as any agency which implements the law. This may be a unique, regional, state police, or federal agency such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Also, it can be utilized to describe an international association such as Europol or Interpol.

To learn more about local law enforcement  refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/24324910

#SPJ4

Answer:false

Explanation:

Answer:

False would be correct

Answer:

True

Explanation:

A Net Operating Loss (NOL) occurs when a company's deductible expenses surpass its taxable income for the year. The carryforward and carryback rules behind the application of NOL accruals to future and past tax liability years will be discussed below.

A Net Operating Loss (NOL) is a business loss that occurs when a company's allowable deductions surpass its taxable income. NOLs are deductible and can be utilized to offset future income, lowering future tax liabilities. The tax law offers two choices for utilizing NOLs, namely carryback and carryforward.

Carryforward and carryback rules behind the application of NOL accruals to future and past tax liability years

The NOL carryback rule allows firms to utilize losses sustained in a specific year to offset taxable income reported in previous years. Firms that carry their losses back can get a refund for prior years' taxes paid. If firms choose to carry their losses forward, they can utilize the loss as a deduction on future year's tax returns. Carryback of Net Operating Losses.

When a taxpayer experiences an NOL in a year, they may elect to carry it back up to two years and claim refunds for taxes paid in those years. The election to carry back an NOL must be made within a year of the year in which the loss occurred, and it must be attached to the tax return for the year in which the loss occurred. When a taxpayer carries an NOL back, it is deducted from taxable income for the carryback year, and a refund is issued for the excess taxes paid.

Carryforward of Net Operating Losses.If an NOL cannot be utilized in a carryback year, the taxpayer may carry it forward for up to 20 years. In other words, the taxpayer can utilize the NOL as a deduction on future tax returns for up to 20 years after the year in which the loss occurred. The taxpayer must carry forward the entire NOL. If the taxpayer had a carryforward NOL but did not have taxable income in a particular year, they would not be able to use any of the NOL carried forward.

Learn more about Net Operating Loss from:

https://brainly.com/question/14933841

#SPJ11

The crime of snatching a purse containing $1000 from the victim's hand is classified as robbery.

Robbery is typically defined as the act of snatching a purse containing $1,000 out of the victim's hand. Robbery is a crime that involves the unlawful taking of someone else's property while they are present while using force, threats, or intimidation. In this instance, the victim is put in danger when the perpetrator forcibly takes away their purse.

In most jurisdictions, robbery is regarded as a serious offense because it directly endangers the victim's safety and property. Depending on the jurisdiction and particular facts, robbery penalties can vary but they frequently have serious legal repercussions, such as jail time, fines and restitution to the victim.

Learn more about robbery at:

brainly.com/question/33396412

#SPJ4

Answer:

The product choices along with its competitive prices were provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Answer:

b. double jeopardy

Explanation:

When a committee chair "pigeonholes" a bill in the Texas legislature, it means that they have essentially set the bill aside and do not plan to bring it up for a vote or further consideration. The bill is effectively dead, unless the committee chair changes their mind and decides to bring it back for discussion and potential passage.

This can be frustrating for those who supported the bill, as it may mean that their efforts to promote the legislation are ultimately fruitless. However, it is ultimately up to the committee chair to decide which bills are given further consideration, and which ones are not.

In the Texas Legislature, when a committee chair "pigeonholes" a bill, the bill essentially gets stalled in the committee process. Pigeonholing refers to the action of the committee chair intentionally delaying or preventing a bill from moving forward for various reasons, such as political differences or workload prioritization. As a result, the bill does not receive further consideration, discussion, or a vote in the committee, hindering its progress towards becoming a law. In this scenario, the pigeonholed bill has a significantly lower chance of advancing in the legislative process, and it often remains stuck until the end of the legislative session.

To know more about Legislature visit-

https://brainly.com/question/530410

#SPJ11

Basis for applying federal regulations to a small restaurantIn Katzenbach v. McClung, the Supreme Court held that Congress had, in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, used the commerce clause as the basis for applying federal regulations to a small restaurant.

The Katzenbach v. McClung case, argued in 1964, is a landmark US Supreme Court decision in which the court upheld the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as constitutionally legal. The Supreme Court upheld the power of Congress under the Commerce Clause to end racial segregation in public facilities in Katzenbach v. McClung.The case involved Ollie McClung, who owned and operated Ollie's Barbecue in Birmingham, Alabama, and refused to serve African American customers. He claimed that he wasn't a part of interstate commerce since he purchased his meat and other supplies from local vendors.

On the other hand, the federal government contended that Ollie's Barbecue was a part of interstate commerce since it bought items from out-of-state suppliers.The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government's use of the commerce clause to regulate Ollie's Barbecue was constitutional. In this case, the court explained that even if an enterprise had no substantial direct impact on interstate commerce, Congress could still regulate it if the enterprise, when combined with others of similar type, had such an impact.

For such more questions on commerce clause:

brainly.com/question/30528135

#SPJ11

According to O*NET, some common tasks performed by Lawyers are:

In legal matters and disputes, a lawyer advises and represents businesses, individuals, and government agencies. The primary responsibilities of a lawyer are to uphold the law while protecting the rights of their clients.

Lawyers provide legal advice, conduct research, and gather evidence or information, draft legal documents such as contracts, divorce decrees, or real estate transactions, and defend or prosecute in court. Lawyers can practice in a variety of areas, including corporate, family, bankruptcy, and environmental law.

Read more about Lawyers

brainly.com/question/20397360

#SPJ1

Answer:

conflict theory: A social science perspective that holds that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society, with inequality perpetuated because it benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor.

Does this help?

Answer:

Prohibited means banned/forbidden. Think of the question as, "What does the 4th amendment protect you from?"

Answer:

vehicle condition

Explanation:

if the brakes on a car are all messed up it'll make stopping alot harder.

Gunshot residue (GSR) can be valuable evidence when investigating cases involving firearms. Although it will vary by caliber of weapon and other conditions, this residue can reach up to 5 feet from the weapon.

The term "gunshot residue" (GSR), also referred to as "cartridge discharge residue" (CDR), "gunfire residue" (GFR), or "firearm discharge residue" (FDR), refers to all of the particles that are ejected from a gun's muzzle after a bullet has been fired. It is mostly made up of burnt and unburnt fragments of the explosive primer, gunpowder, and evaporated lead.

Testing for the presence of fused barium, antimony, and lead particles, which are known to be found in GSR, involves lifting samples from a defendant's hands or clothing and analysing them.

To learn more about Gunshot residue visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/5840314

#SPJ4

The issue is that the union is seeking authorization cards to gain access to the facility to talk to employees. An authorization card is a signed statement, in writing, that authorizes a labor union to represent the person who signs it.

The union is trying to gain access to a company with the intention of representing its employees.The union requesting access to a company to speak to its employees can lead to some concerns. The company should consider the following before granting access: the impact of unionization on company profits and productivity, the level of support for unionization among workers, and the company’s legal obligations. The company should also create an opportunity to provide employees with comprehensive information regarding unionization.

The issue here is the union's request for mandatory union membership for all employees. The concept of right-to-work is that no one can be forced to join a union. However, in a non-right-to-work state, some employers require workers to join a union as a condition of employment. The company must first determine whether it is a right-to-work state or not.If the company is in a right-to-work state, mandatory union membership is not permitted. The company should inform the union that mandatory union membership is illegal in the state. It is also essential to inform employees that joining the union is voluntary. This approach is likely to discourage union membership, thereby preventing the union from obtaining exclusive bargaining rights with the company.

To know more about Employee union visit-

brainly.com/question/19593231

#SPJ11

Officers should direct the occupants of a target vehicle involved in a high risk pullover to exit the vehicle when they have reasonable suspicion that the occupants pose a threat to their safety.

This could include if the occupants are suspected of a violent crime, have a weapon in the vehicle, or have made threatening gestures or statements. Officers should also take into account the environment, such as the time of day and amount of traffic in the area.

Additionally, officers should use discretion when deciding whether to direct occupants to exit the vehicle, as well as whether to use verbal commands or hand signals to do so.

To know more about vehicle , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13390217

#SPJ4

The question -

Under what conditions can any officers direct the occupants of a target vehicle involved in a high risk pullover to exit their vehicle?

Answer:

members of the House are elected every two years, whereas senators are elected for six-year terms. ... Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years.

Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts

Explanation:

The House and Senate are equal partners in the legislative process—legislation cannot be enacted without the consent of both chambers. However, the Constitution grants each chamber some unique powers. The Senate ratifies treaties and approves presidential appointments while the House initiates revenue-raising bills.

The five remedies offered to the racial group that experienced discrimination are as follows:

The idea of racial discrimination states that people should not be accepted because of the color of their skin or their religion.

The following is a description of the available racial discrimination remedies:

To learn more about  tax evasion, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/16630324

Explanation:

you gon give me some money?

Answer: i need it im sorry

Explanation:

trust me

The inference is that the disadvantage of the NIBRS is that it has limited coverage.

The National Incident-Based Reporting System brings detailed, incident-based data to the Uniform Crime Reporting program.

It is an incident-based reporting system for crimes known to the police

In this case, the inference is that the disadvantage of the NIBRS is that it has limited coverage.

Learn more about NIBRS on:

https://brainly.com/question/17448985

#SPJ1

The solicitor general chooses which appeals from lower courts should be filed and personally approves each one that is submitted. This attorney represents the federal government before the Supreme Court.

The government's stance in a matter is decided by the solicitor general. The solicitor general (or an assistant) makes the oral arguments before the Court, while the lawyers in his or her office prepare and submit the petitions and briefs. The solicitor general may decide to intervene or make a statement as a third party in other situations when the United States is neither the petitioner nor the respondent. The justices occasionally request the solicitor general to comment on or submit a brief in a matter before granting cert., suggesting their potential interest in placing it on the docket. The justices' refusal to consider a matter may also be suggested by the solicitor general.

learn more about federal government here:

https://brainly.com/question/24049224

#SPJ4

The desire for independence of the French colony of New Caledonia nearly caused a civil war to break out in France.

New Caledonia, located in the South Pacific, had been under French control since the mid-19th century. However, in the late 20th century, a pro-independence movement gained momentum in the indigenous Kanak population, leading to tensions and conflict. In the 1980s, the situation escalated to the brink of civil war when violence erupted between pro-independence groups and those favoring continued French rule.

The French government intervened, and a series of negotiations eventually resulted in the Nouméa Accord of 1998, granting New Caledonia a greater degree of autonomy while maintaining its ties to France.

For more information on civil war visit: brainly.com/question/1061034

#SPJ11

Two arguments made against American involvement in World War II were:

Isolationism: Many Americans believed that the United States should not get involved in European conflicts and should focus on domestic issues instead. They saw World War I as a mistake that had cost the country too much in lives and resources and did not want to repeat that experience.

Pacifism: Some Americans, including many members of the peace movement, believed that war was never the answer and that violence only begets more violence. They saw World War II as an unnecessary and avoidable conflict that could be resolved through negotiation and diplomacy.

Franklin D. Roosevelt refuted these arguments by pointing out that the United States could not remain isolated from the rest of the world and that the threats posed by Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan could not be ignored. He argued that the United States had a moral obligation to defend the principles of democracy and freedom against totalitarian regimes that threatened to destroy them.

In a speech to Congress on December 8, 1941, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt said, "We are now in this war. We are all in it—all the way. Every single man, woman, and child is a partner in the most tremendous undertaking of our American history." He argued that the United States could not sit on the sidelines and watch as the world was plunged into darkness and tyranny.

Roosevelt also emphasized the importance of building alliances with other nations, such as Great Britain and the Soviet Union, to defeat the Axis powers. He recognized that the United States could not win the war alone and needed the support of its allies to achieve victory.

In summary, Franklin D. Roosevelt refuted arguments against American involvement in World War II by emphasizing the moral obligation to defend democracy and freedom, the necessity of building alliances with other nations, and the danger of remaining isolated in a world threatened by totalitarianism.

To know more about involvement  click here:

brainly.com/question/22437948

#SPJ4

The contingency fee is the best type of fee arrangement for lily.

Contingent fees, often called contingency fees or conditional fees, are any fees for services provided that are only paid if a favorable outcome occurs. Despite the fact that this allegation can be used in a variety of professions, it is most usually associated with the practice of law.

A contingent fee is a cost associated with legal services that are only charged if a lawsuit is won or a favorable settlement is reached. Contingent fees are sometimes represented as a percentage of the settlement amount that the client receives.

Contingent fees may make it easier for people with less financial resources to seek their civil rights because one must be wealthy enough to start such litigation in the first place in order to sue someone for a tort. Although there are risks involved with taking cases on a contingency basis, attorneys won't do so unless they believe there is merit to the case.

To know more about contingency fees visit:- brainly.com/question/13447810

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. False

4. True

5. True

Explanation:

This is all I know :)

Answer:

backspace

Explanation:

delete

Answer:

When u wanna delete something

Explanation:

Have a Nice Day