Why did Philip Nolan concern Spanish leaders in Mexico ?

Zheng He, the renowned Chinese explorer, embarked on several voyages during the 15th century, commanding a massive fleet. He ventured into many parts of the world, promoting trade and diplomacy. However, one region he did not visit was South America. Here option C is the correct answer.

Zheng He primarily explored the Indian Ocean and reached as far as the eastern coast of Africa. His expeditions covered areas such as Southeast Asia, India, the Persian Gulf, and the eastern coast of Africa. These voyages aimed to establish Chinese influence, expand trade networks, and showcase China's naval power.

While Zheng He's expeditions were extensive, there is no historical evidence to suggest that he traveled to South America. His voyages focused mainly on regions along the maritime Silk Road, connecting the East with the West through maritime trade routes.

Zheng He's expeditions, which took place during the early 15th century (between 1405 and 1433), were primarily focused on the Indian Ocean and surrounding regions. The purpose of these voyages was to enhance China's diplomatic relations, establish Chinese dominance in the region, and expand trade networks.

To learn more about trade

https://brainly.com/question/1413860

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Which of the following parts of the world did Zheng He NOT visit?

a) Southeast Asia

b) East Africa

c) South America

d) Middle East

Answer:

Explanation:

Professor Cobb's point can be valid if we consider the possibility that even if the document in question is not genuine, it may still reflect certain aspects of today's society concerning black and brown people. While historical authenticity is crucial, it is essential to acknowledge that the document's content might resonate with current social issues faced by marginalized communities. It could highlight enduring systemic biases, racial discrimination, or unequal treatment that persist in various forms. Professor Cobb's argument invites us to critically examine the document's themes and consider their relevance within our contemporary context.

When contemplating why someone would fabricate such a document, several potential purposes come to mind. Firstly, it might serve as a thought-provoking tool, aiming to shed light on historical injustices and their echoes in modern society. By presenting a fictional account rooted in real historical experiences, the intention could be to prompt conversations, foster empathy, and encourage discussions on racial equality. Secondly, the document could be a work of creative expression, seeking to explore the human experience and provoke emotional responses. Lastly, it is possible that someone might create such a document to deceive or manipulate others, exploiting sensitive issues for personal gain or to incite unrest. However, further investigation and analysis would be necessary to determine the true motives behind its creation.

In conclusion, while the authenticity of the document remains uncertain, Professor Cobb raises a valid point by urging us to examine its content in relation to present-day experiences of black and brown communities. Regardless of its origins, the document could provide insights into persistent societal issues, serving as a catalyst for discussions and reflections on racial inequalities. Understanding the purpose behind its creation requires careful examination and consideration of the broader context, encompassing educational, artistic, or potentially manipulative intentions.

In the fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Italy, artists were most likely to:

B) develop and practice mechanical, artistic, decorating, and engineering skills in order to make a living.

During this period, known as the Renaissance, there was a significant shift in the mindset and practices of artists. They embraced the idea of humanism, which emphasized the importance of human potential and individualism. Artists sought to explore various fields of knowledge, including mathematics, anatomy, and engineering, in addition to their artistic pursuits. They believed in the concept of the "Renaissance man" who was skilled in multiple disciplines.

Artists of this time, such as Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Brunelleschi, were not solely focused on painting church ceilings (option C). While religious art was still prevalent, they were also involved in creating sculptures, architecture, scientific inventions, and decorative works. They applied their skills to a wide range of projects, including the design of buildings, engineering marvels, and even military fortifications.

The artists of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Italy did not reject the study of war machinery and moral philosophy (option D). In fact, many artists of the Renaissance had a deep interest in both subjects. Leonardo da Vinci, for example, extensively studied and designed war machines, while also delving into moral philosophy and questioning societal norms.

Overall, the artists of this period saw themselves as innovators and sought to expand their knowledge and skills beyond traditional artistic practices. They were multifaceted individuals who embraced various disciplines and contributed to the cultural, scientific, and artistic advancements of the Renaissance.

for more questions on century

https://brainly.com/question/621419

#SPJ8

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

Bernardo de Gálvez.

Explanation:

:-)

Answer:

D

Explanation:

The interpretations of the idea that governments derive their power "from the consent of the governed" change between the writing of the Declaration of Independence and today is B: Interpretations narrowed to allow the government to disregard the consent of most citizens

The Declaration of Independence can be described as one that focus on the basic ideas that God made all men equal and gave them the rights of life, liberty,  as well as pursuit of happiness.

It should eb noted that the document also stressed that the main business of government is to protect these rights and also established that government tries to withhold these rights, the people are free to revolt  however considering the case above the Interpretations narrowed to allow the government to disregard the consent of most citizens.

Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about Declaration of Independence at:

https://brainly.com/question/14651945

#SPJ1

Diocletian reorganized the military for several reasons, including the need for a more efficient and effective defense against external threats, such as barbarian invasions, and internal rebellions.

Diocletian reorganized the military due to increasing external threats and internal instability within the Roman Empire. His goal was to strengthen the empire's defense capabilities and maintain control over the vast territories. Key factors included border incursions, economic pressures, and administrative challenges.

He also sought to strengthen the loyalty of the military to the state and reduce the power of individual commanders by creating a new system of military hierarchy and organization known as the Tetrarchy. Additionally, he wanted to centralize the administration of the military and increase the recruitment of soldiers from all parts of the empire, regardless of social status or origin.

These reforms helped to stabilize the Roman Empire and provide a strong military foundation for future rulers.

Know more about the Diocletian

https://brainly.com/question/1728292

#SPJ11

In the long run, leaders who demonstrated religious tolerance did better. This is because people are typically more productive and peaceful when they are allowed to freely practise their religion.

A more harmonious society can result from tolerance of different beliefs because it promotes respect and understanding between people of different faiths. On the other hand, societies often rebelled, fought, and split under leaders who did not practise religious tolerance. I would advise current world leaders to promote religious tolerance and respect for various beliefs in light of what I have learned in this module. They should work to develop laws that uphold the rights of all religious groups, promote mutual respect, and acceptance. By doing so, leaders can create a more stable and prosperous society, where all citizens feel valued and respected.

To Know more about Religion Visit:

brainly.com/question/30228180

#SPJ1

Answer:

i think is TRUE...

Answer:

nope it did not

Explanation:

Answer: grow

Explanation: you will die before anything pops up from the ground if you last one week until death there just roots hope this helps

If this doesn't helps it's hunting because all the stalking chasing and many fails will exhausted you plus all the area you will need to search.

he was a strong supporter of slavery expanding westward and his critics believed this was a flaw of his because he wasn't thinking about how the American people might react towards his strong feelings towards the topic

The prominent American industrialist and philanthropist John D. Rockefeller is known for his enormous contributions to charity causes during his lifetime. While determining the precise amount he provided to charity is difficult, it is thought that Rockefeller's overall philanthropic donations topped $500 million.

When adjusted for inflation, this sum is worth several billions of dollars today.Rockefeller's generosity was mostly channelled through the Rockefeller Foundation, which he established in 1913.

He did, however, make significant contributions to a number of educational institutions, including the University of Chicago, Rockefeller University, and Spelman College. He also supported medical research, public health programmes, and natural resource protection.

For more questions on medical research,

https://brainly.com/question/28420128

#SPJ11

Answer: D

$1087.50

Explanation:

Sofonisba Anguissola is unusual among women artists in the sixteenth century because she had a successful career as an artist. In addition, she painted portraits and was not the daughter of an artist. So, the correct option is D. All of the above.

Women artists are creative in painting, sculpture, illustration, and other visual arts. Because women have been historically underrepresented and undervalued in the art world, the term women artists is used to recognize their contributions. Sofonisba Anguissola (1532–1625) was an Italian painter who lived in the 16th century. Anguissola, born into an aristocratic family, was fortunate to receive painting lessons as a child. She became a court painter to the Spanish king, Philip II, after receiving further art instruction in Cremona and Rome. She was a successful portrait painter whose work was highly valued during her lifetime. She was one of the few female artists to achieve recognition and success in a male-dominated field in the 16th century.

Learn more about Sofonisba Anguissola here: https://brainly.com/question/14036037.

#SPJ11

Some British cabinet members hoped that the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine would help to secure British interests in the region. Specifically, they believed that supporting the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine would:

In conclusion, British officials saw the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine as a way to further British interests in the region and secure British control over key strategic assets like the Suez Canal.

Learn more about Palestine:

https://brainly.com/question/3601115

#SPJ11

Answer:

The legislative congress is made of 2 groups, the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Explanation:

The three things you learned from 3-2-1 lesson are

The people that influence public policy are:

How is behavior been influence.

The term behavioral perspective, is seen as the way that people often behave and tries to learn and it is one that can be explained via  our interactions with the environment.

Hence,  The three things you learned from 3-2-1 lesson are

Learn more about Behavioral perspective from

https://brainly.com/question/13835486

#SPJ1

Explanation:

C. Confederate system

Answer:

Explanation:

The Battle of Fort Sumter (April 12–13, 1861) was the bombardment of Fort Sumter near Charleston, South Carolina by the South Carolina militia (the Confederate Army did not yet exist), and the return gunfire and subsequent surrender by the United States Army, that started the American Civil War.

so basically hitler intended to destroy what he saw as stalin's Jewish bolshevist regime and establish nazi hegemony.

Answer:

atoms

Explanation:

Answer:

I hope this helps you! ::))

Explanation:

The President, however, can influence and shape legislation by a threat of a veto. By threatening a veto, the President can persuade legislators to alter the content of the bill to be more acceptable to the President. Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate.

Answer:

I'm not sure

Explanation:

Race and gender shouldn't tear us apart. Everyone should be loving and accepting towards each other!

Answer:

In addition to vastly increasing Britain's land in North America, the Seven Years' War changed economic, political, and social relations between Britain and its colonies. It plunged Britain into debt, nearly doubling the national debt.

I hope this is something your looking for.

Explanation:

Answer:

It really depends on which civilization, but in most of them, annual flooding prompted irrigation.

The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates held in 1858 between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, who were running for the U.S. Senate from Illinois. The main issue of the debates was slavery and its expansion into the western territories. Douglas was a proponent of popular sovereignty, which allowed the settlers of a territory to decide whether or not to allow slavery, while Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery into the territories. The debates were widely covered in the press and helped to raise the profile of both candidates, as well as to bring the issue of slavery to the forefront of national politics.

In the first debate, Lincoln argued that the Founders had intended to limit the spread of slavery and that the Missouri Compromise had established a precedent for keeping slavery out of the western territories. Douglas countered that popular sovereignty was the best way to resolve the slavery issue and accused Lincoln of being an abolitionist. In the second debate, Lincoln continued to argue against the extension of slavery and emphasized the moral wrongness of the institution. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's position as extreme and suggesting that it would lead to civil war.

In the fifth debate, Lincoln questioned Douglas's commitment to popular sovereignty and accused him of supporting the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, which had upheld the right to own slaves as property. Lincoln argued that the decision was a threat to the rights of free blacks and that it was the duty of Congress to prevent the spread of slavery. Douglas responded by defending theDred Scott decision and arguing that the Constitution protected property rights, including the right to own slaves. He also accused Lincoln of advocating for racial equality, which he believed was a dangerous and radical position.

In the final debate, Lincoln and Douglas clashed over the issue of citizenship for Black Americans. Lincoln argued that Black Americans were entitled to the same rights and protections as white citizens, while Douglas believed that citizenship should be determined by state law. Lincoln also criticized Douglas's position on popular sovereignty, arguing that it would only lead to more conflict and division over the issue of slavery. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's views on racial equality and accusing him of supporting the abolitionist movement.

Overall, the Lincoln-Douglas debates were a pivotal moment in American history, as they helped to shape the national debate over slavery and its extension into the western territories. The debates highlighted the stark differences between the two candidates on the issue of slavery and helped to galvanize public opinion on the issue. While Lincoln ultimately lost the Senate election to Douglas, the debates helped to establish him as a national figure and set the stage for his eventual election as President in 1860.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

Henry Clay was a prominent American statesman who played a significant role in the lead up to the Civil War. He was known as the "Great Compromiser" for his efforts to find a compromise between the North and South on the issue of slavery, which was a major point of contention leading up to the Civil War.

Clay served as a United States Senator and Speaker of the House of Representatives, and was involved in many important debates and decisions in the lead up to the Civil War. One of his most notable contributions was the Compromise of 1850, which sought to resolve the dispute over whether new territories should be free or slave states.

The Compromise of 1850 included several provisions that attempted to balance the interests of both the North and South. It admitted California as a free state, abolished the slave trade in Washington D.C., and established a stricter fugitive slave law. While the Compromise of 1850 was not perfect and did not completely resolve the issue of slavery, it helped to temporarily ease tensions between the North and South.

Clay also played a role in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed settlers in new territories to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. This act ultimately led to violent conflicts between pro- and anti-slavery groups in Kansas, and further strained the relationship between the North and South.

Despite his efforts to find a compromise, Clay was unable to prevent the outbreak of the Civil War. However, his legacy as the "Great Compromiser" has endured, and his efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the issue of slavery helped to shape the political landscape of the United States in the years leading up to the war.

It is a codename in French that identifies them to one another as revolutionists.

During the Jacquerie, a 1358 uprising of peasants against the French aristocracy, Parisian rebels began addressing one another as Jacques. The aristocrats refer to the peasant in a derogatory manner, calling him Jack to highlight his inferiority complex and deny him individuality. More people will become aware of French peasants as a result of Dr. Manette's presence, increasing awareness of what the French government is doing to captive animals. You might see the appalling abuse. Jack The revolutionaries who prepared for and carried out the French Revolution were Jack Lee's one, two, three, and four participants. His name is a nickname for a farmer. They use the nickname Jack as a slang term for  members of the Revolution.

To learn more about French here:-

https://brainly.com/question/28616370

#SPJ4