Why did England and Spain use different methods and means to subjugate the colonies? Which method left a deeper mark in the former colonies?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
the English settled in areas without large native empires unlike the Spanish, so because of this the English were not able to take control of large native populated areas.
I Would say that the Spanish had a longer shorter time ownership of colonies but had a deeper impact for the time they spent over there but the English has the longest lasting impact today.
Related Questions
Someone pls help me!!!
Select the reasons that the Americans were disinterested in President Wilson's programs after the Great War.
Americans were tired of causes and reforms.
Americans wanted to forget the war and enjoy life.
The programs were expensive.
The United States was too weak to follow up on them.
Answers
Americans were tired of causes and reforms.
Americans wanted to forget the war and enjoy life
there ya go
The Seneca tell the story of Gaqka, whose name means what? Bear Crow Stands Alone O Kicking Bird Question 5 ✓ Saved Listen According to the textbook introduction, which of the following were popular forms of literature in early colonial America? O religious works travel literature (tales of voyages and exploration) poetry all of the above Question 6 ✓ Saved Listen Christopher Columbus kept a record of his exploratory travels, excerpts of which you read in Module B. For which country was he exploring? England Spain Italy O France
Answers
Gaqka, whose name translates to "crow," is the subject of the Seneca legend. He was a young boy who had lost everything and no one in his village wanted to help him. Option B is correct.
5. In the early colonial period of America, all of the aforementioned genres of literature were popular. Religion is conspicuous in provincial writing and can be found generally in puritans composing. Colonial literature also included a lot of poetry and travel writing. Option C is correct.
6. He went exploring for Spain, crossing the Atlantic Ocean four times from Spain. He wanted to find a waterway that went directly from Europe to Asia, but he never did.
Learn more about Colonial America:
brainly.com/question/28646675
#SPJ4
Complete Question as follows:
The Seneca tell the story of Gaqka, whose name means what?
A. Bear
B. Crow
C. Stands Alone
D. Kicking Bird
Question 5 According to the textbook introduction, which of the following were popular forms of literature in early colonial America?
A. religious works
B. travel literature (tales of voyages and exploration) poetry
C. all of the above
Question 6 Christopher Columbus kept a record of his exploratory travels, excerpts of which you read in Module B. For which country was he exploring?
A. England
B. Spain
C. Italy
D. France
6. Write an essay ranking the following three foreign policy concerns in order of importance:
Economics
Human rights
Terrorism
Be sure to explain why you believe each U.S. foreign policy concern is more or less important than the other two.
Answers
To write an essay ranking the three foreign policy issues in order of importance, it is necessary that you do a thorough research through reliable sources to form a consistent opinion about the economy, human rights and terrorism.
You can think about which of the three foreign policy issues are intertwined and affect each other.
For example:
The promotion and maintenance of Human Rights is a factor that directly impacts the economy, generates more jobs and reduces terrorism.
Other tips for building a good essay are:
Create topics for clarity and idea building.Support your argument through reliable sources such as official indexes or recognized authors.Create an objective introduction that engages the reader to continue reading the essay.This is a creativity issue that should be written by you, but I hope these tips are helpful.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/14374558
58:44 How did the ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson affect the legalities of segregation? It set "separate but equal" as a legal precedent. It implemented desegregation legislation. It determined that separation based on race can never be equal. It discouraged people from continued protests.
Answers
The correct answer is A) It set "separate but equal" as a legal precedent.
The ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson affected the legalities of segregation in that "It set "separate but equal" as a legal precedent.
In a time when racial segregation was a major issue in the United States, the decision of the US Supreme Court in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson (May 18, 1896) established the legal precedent of "separate but equal." One of the consequences of this controversial decision was that Jin Crow laws continue to hurt African Americans in the southern states. The Supreme Court stated the protection referred to the 14th Amendment was to rights such as voting rights, not for sitting on a special couch of a train.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It set “separate but equal” as a legal precedent.
Which description best explains the domain of (g o f)(x)?
A. ) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined
B. ) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero
C. ) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined
D. ) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero
Answers
Let f(x) and g(x) be two functions, then the domain of (g o f)(x) is defined as the set of all x-values that make the function (g o f)(x) defined. So, (g o f)(x) = g(f(x)).This means that the function f(x) is applied first to x and then the result of f(x) is used as the input for the function g(x).
Let's explain the options:
A) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined B) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero C) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined D) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero.
As per the definition, (g o f)(x) is only defined if the input of g(x) from f(x) is defined. Therefore, the answer is (C) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined. So, in order to find the domain of (g o f)(x), you have to look for the values of x which will make g(f(x)) defined.
To know more about domain visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29452843
#SPJ11
Sparta won the Peloponnesian War because...
Answers
Answer:
Sparta and her allies won the Peloponnesian Wars due to the strength of the Spartan military, poor Athenian choices made in battle, and the physical state of Athens by the end of the war.
why do you think Athenians made this rule? hint think about their government experiences before democracy
Answers
Answer:
The Athenian statesman Pericles defined democracy as a system which protects the interests of all the people, not just a minority. He also said that the ability
Explanation:
ap world history unit 6.
1.(HELP 40 POINTS )Identify ONE economic change in the period 1750-1900 that led to the formation of
new elites. S
(1 Point)
Answers
Answer:
The response earned 1 point because it identifies capitalism as the economic change in the period 1750–1900 that led to the formation of new elites.
Explanation:
The ultimate goal for those who follow Buddhism is to:
OA. be released from the cycle of reincarnation through
enlightenment.
B. be reborn into the highest caste of society and live in comfort.
C. become a god who is worshipped by others for the rest of time
D. convert as many followers of other religions as possible to
Buddhism.
SUBM
Answers
Answer: A. be released from the cycle of reincarnation through enlightenment
Explanation:
The goal of Buddhism is to become enlightened and reach nirvana. Nirvana is believed to be attainable only by eliminating all greed, hatred, and ignorance within a person. Nirvana signifies the end of the cycle of death and rebirth.
Great britain ceded both east and west florida to spain as part of the treaty of paris in the year ________. 1781 1782 1783 1784.
Answers
Great Britain ceded both east and west Florida to Spain as part of the treaty of Paris in the year 1783.
What is treaty of Paris?
On September 3, 1783, delegates of King George III of Great Britain and the United States of America signed the Treaty of Paris, which put an end to the American Revolutionary War and the general state of hostility between the two nations. With "exceedingly liberal" provisions for the latter, the treaty established the borders between the British Empire in North America and the United States of America. Fishing rights, property restoration, and the release of prisoners of war were among the specifics.
The French and Indian War came to an end in 1783 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris by France, Britain, and Spain. Nearly all of France's land in North America was ceded as part of the pact, and Spain ceded Florida. Havana, the busiest port in Spain, had been taken by Britain during the French and Indian War. Florida was given to Britain by the Spanish in return for Havana. East Florida and West Florida were the result of this division by the British. In Florida, this era was referred to as the British Period.
To know more about treaty of Paris, go to link
https://brainly.com/question/756759
#SPJ4
What were the benefits of changing the dam's construction? Check all that apply. It would deliver more water for irrigation. It would help protect homes from river overflow. It would earn money to cover construction costs. It would lead to the creation of a second reservoir. It would require fewer workers to complete construction. It would store water all the way to the Canadian border.
Answers
Answer:
A) It would deliver more water for irrigation.
B) It would help protect homes from river overflow.
C) It would earn money to cover construction costs.
F) It would store water all the way to the Canadian border.
Explanation:
Took the assignment on EDG not too long ago. I'm like 90% sure this is correct.
Answer:
Answers A.B.C. and F.
Explanation:
Those are the correct answers! Hope this helps!
How did the passage of the Nuremberg Laws affect the lives of Marianne Schweitzer and her family?
What did it mean in Germany in 1935 to be told that you were no longer a citizen? What rights and protections would you have lost? What would it mean to be told such a thing where you live today?
Answers
The Nuremberg Laws affected the Civil Rights, Professional and Economic Restrictions, Social Exclusion etc. After being told that they are no longer a citizen, Marianne Schweitzer and her family would depended on circumstances such as location in Germany and their level of integration in society.
The passage of the Nuremberg Laws in 1935 had a significant impact on the lives of Marianne Schweitzer and her family, particularly if they were of Jewish heritage. The Nuremberg Laws were a set of antisemitic legislation introduced by the Nazi regime in Germany, aimed at marginalizing and persecuting Jewish individuals.
If Marianne Schweitzer and her family were Jewish, the Nuremberg Laws would have stripped them of their German citizenship. This meant that they would have lost many fundamental rights and protections. Some of the key rights and protections they would have been deprived of include:
1. Civil Rights: Jews were denied basic civil rights, including the right to vote, hold public office, and marry non-Jewish individuals. They were also prohibited from employing non-Jewish domestic workers.
2. Professional and Economic Restrictions: Jewish individuals were barred from various professions, such as civil service, teaching, and practicing law or medicine. They faced severe economic discrimination, as many businesses boycotted Jewish-owned establishments and Jewish individuals were excluded from participating in certain economic activities.
3. Social Exclusion: Jews were subjected to widespread social discrimination and segregation. They were excluded from public spaces, parks, and recreational facilities. Jewish children were expelled from public schools and were forced to attend separate Jewish schools.
4. Property Confiscation: The Nuremberg Laws facilitated the confiscation of Jewish-owned property, businesses, and assets. Jewish individuals faced significant economic hardship as a result of these measures.
5. Persecution and Violence: The Nuremberg Laws were part of a larger campaign of persecution against Jews, which included acts of violence, harassment, and humiliation. Jewish individuals were targeted by state-sanctioned discrimination, leading to increased social and psychological distress.
It is important to note that the exact impact on Marianne Schweitzer and her family would depend on their specific circumstances, such as their location in Germany and their level of integration in German society.
In the context of today, being told that you are no longer a citizen in your current country would have significant implications. Citizenship provides individuals with legal protections, rights, and access to various services.
Losing citizenship would result in the loss of these rights and protections, including the right to vote, social benefits, and access to government services. It would also lead to the loss of legal status and potential difficulties in terms of employment, education, and travel. The specific consequences would vary depending on the country and its laws regarding citizenship and residency.
To know more about Nuremberg Laws, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9286721#
#SPJ11
do you agree with the decision made by roosevelt and churchill to require unconditional surrender by the axis powers? why or why not?
Answers
Yes, I believe we should have asked for unconditional surrender because Germany had killed innocent because of their religion. The Casablanca gathering brought about the total acquiescence of the pivot powers and let the Soviets to battle.
The most ideal choice that summarizes how these three accomplished their objectives was that They met a few objectives, the most significant of which was overcoming the axis powers.
These three individuals were the heads of the associated powers. The united powers were made those that were entrusted with the obligation of overcoming the hub powers. This was during the universal conflict. The partnered powers were comprised of the US, the UK, and Russia. They accomplished the accomplishment of overcoming the hub powers.
Learn more about axis powers:
https://brainly.com/question/25303141
#SPJ4
Study the political cartoon. Which best describes the tone of this image?
Patriotic
Supportive
Disapproving
Boring
Answers
Answer:
\(\tex\huge\boxed{\texttt{C. Disapproving}}\)
Explanation:
1. POLITICAL CONTEXTThis political cartoon represents the different ideologies in US politics during the early 19th century. Shown in this picture is Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States, serving from 1829 - 1837. During this time, the rise of the modern two-party system had started to take form with the evolution of the Jacksonian Democrats and the Whigs - both powerful parties.
THE JACKSONIAN DEMOCRATS were members of a party formed directly by Andrew Jackson. In response to the Election of 1824, Jackson formed this party out of his ideas and championed against the "Corrupt Bargain." The Corrupt Bargain was when President-elects Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams did not receive the majority of the electoral votes, leaving the decision in the hands of the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, a senator, made the final vote for JQA in exchange for him being the Secretary of State (often seen as the gateway to presidency). This enraged Jackson, who formed his own party and championed direct democracy and extension of rights to all white Americans (not just the rich)THE WHIGS were the political party that formed out of direct opposition to the Jacksonian Democrats. Seeing Jackson's views on direct democracy and states rights, the Whigs came together and formed a party from the Democratic-Republicans which would last up until the antebellum period just before the Civil War.Now we should examine some of Jackson's key traits.
2. JACKSONAndrew Jackson was quite a controversial man in his time period and, to this day, remains the center of several historical debates. Jackson was the champion of the War of 1812, winning the Battle of New Orleans which set the American mindest that they had won the war (even though it ended in a stalemate) and ushered in the Era of Good Feelings. Upon his victory, he ran for president and championed his ideas of direct democracy. However, when he took office, he imposed several policies that seemed to strengthen the power of the Executive Branch, much to the dismay of the Whigs. Below are some examples of his outstretching of power.
THE BANK CRISIS. In the Bank Crisis, the charter for the Second Bank of the United States had expired, and Jackson was faced with the question of whether to renew it. Seeing that the Bank had favored the elite and not the typical farmer, he decided not to charter it. He instead created pet banks - banks set up, controlled by states, that would be under his control. However, this failed horribly. The Specie Circular required land to be sold in GOLD and SILVER, which was not in great quantity at the time. This led to the Panic of 1837 - a major economic downturn.THE NULLIFICATION CRISIS. In the Nullification Crisis, a new tariff had been imposed on the nation to help promote Northern industry and allow for the internal trade of the nation to develop. However, this was highly aimed at the North, not the South, who relied on foreign imports as they produced crops. With this, South Carolina nullified this law. Jackson saw this as a betrayal to the nation and made the Force Bill, which allowed him to go in and enforce the tariff by force. Things would have gotten worse if it weren't for Henry Clay's Compromise of 1833, which gradually reduced this tariff.THE INDIAN REMOVAL ACT. Several Native tribes peacefully lived in Georgia, until gold was discovered. This prompted Andrew Jackson to consider moving the Natives out of their land that they were using in order to extract this gold. In the case Worcester v. Georgia, the Natives successfully sued for their right to the land. Jackson ignored this and sent them anyway. The Trail of Tears was a brutal campaign against the Natives that forced them to trek through the American West to reservation land in the Winter, killing 15,000 people.Above are just some examples of Jackson's overstretch of the Executive Presidency, which makes him such a controversial man. We can now move into cartoon analysis.
3. CARTOON ANALYSISIn the cartoon, we see Andrew Jackson portrayed with a monarch's robes and hat. The titles say "BORN TO COMMAND" and "KING ANDREW THE FIRST." It's immediately evident that this goes against American ideals of democracy and a fair government. The US had fought the Revolutionary War just to escape a monarchy. The depiction of Jackson as a monarch thus reflects his overreach of the Executive Power and his monarchical style actions. The depiction of Jackson as a king goes directly against American ideas of a fair government and thus paints Jackson in a bad manner, ruling out A and B. It does not describe Jackson as option D as there is a clear intent to this cartoon. Thus, the correct answer is C - Disapproving.
Hope this helped!
In Act lll Romeo and Juliet, why is Romeo considered the protagonist?
Answers
Answer:
because he has a conflict to overcome.
Explanation:
please mark me brainloest i need one :(
What percentage of military inductees were college students during the Vietnam War?
2
10
25
40
50
Answers
The percentage of military inductees who were college students during the Vietnam War was 2%.
Among the given options, the correct answer is 2. During the Vietnam War, a relatively small percentage of military inductees were college students. The majority of individuals drafted or enlisting in the military during that time came from diverse backgrounds and educational levels.
The low percentage of college students serving in the military during the Vietnam War can be attributed to various factors, including deferments granted for educational purposes and the influence of anti-war sentiment on college campuses. It is important to note that this percentage may vary depending on the specific timeframe and context within the Vietnam War.
To learn more about Vietnam War click here :
brainly.com/question/31746600
#SPJ11
boycotts, work slowdowns, and corporate campaigns have increased since the 1980s because? A. Empoyees have become more militant.
B. Strikes are no longer a viable option for many workers because of the employer's use of permanent strike replacements
C. Strikes are less costly to employers because they have more inventory today.
D. Strikes are no longer legal in most situations.
Answers
The most likely purpose for the increase in boycotts, work slowdowns, and corporate campaigns since the Nineteen Eighties is option B - strikers are no longer a feasible choice for plenty employees because of the organisation's use of everlasting strike replacements.
The use of permanent alternative employees through employers has made it a whole lot more tough for putting workers to have an effect on the agency. This has led to workers exploring other strategies of protest, such as boycotts, work slowdowns, and company campaigns, which may be effective in elevating public attention and placing stress on groups to change their practices.
Additionally, modifications in the political and financial panorama since the 1980s have caused a decline in union membership and bargaining strength, which has also contributed to the upward thrust of these alternative forms of protest.
Learn more about boycotts:-
https://brainly.com/question/28393484
#SPJ4
Boycotts, work slowdowns, and corporate campaigns have increased since the 1980s because employees have become more militant.
This is due to various factors such as the decline of unions, increasing income inequality, and the growing awareness of corporate practices that negatively impact workers, consumers, and the environment.
Additionally, strikes are less common because employers have more inventory and can withstand a work stoppage for a longer period of time. However, strikes are still legal in most situations, but other tactics like boycotts and corporate campaigns have become more popular as a way to put pressure on companies to change their practices.
Boycotts, work slowdowns, and corporate campaigns have increased since the 1980s because employees have become more militant. This means that employees are more assertive and proactive in advocating for their rights and improved working conditions. As a result, they are increasingly using these non-traditional methods to pressure employers for change, rather than relying solely on traditional strikes.
Visit here to learn more about Boycotts brainly.com/question/878223
#SPJ11
a u.s. senator from wisconsin who made claims that there were soviet and communist spies in the us federal government in 1950. he served in the senate from 1947 until his death in 1957. who is he ?
Answers
Joseph Raymond McCarthy was a U.S. senator from Wisconsin who made claims that there were soviet and communist spies in our federal government in 1950. he served in the senate from 1947 until he died in 1957.
Starting in 1950, McCarthy rose to prominence as the nation's most well-known public figure during a time when Cold War tensions fanned concerns about extensive communist influence. He gained notoriety for claiming that a large number of communists and Soviet spies, supporters, and other individuals had penetrated the US federal government, universities, film industry, and other institutions.
He was ultimately punished for refusing to comply with the committee formed to determine whether or not he should be censured and for abusing its members. In 1950, McCarthy's methods led to the word "McCarthyism," which was quickly used to describe other anti-communist measures. Today, the phrase is used more broadly to denote public criticism of the morals or patriotism of political opponents as well as demagogic, hasty, and unfounded allegations.
To learn more about Joseph Raymond McCarthy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1298621
#SPJ4
What questions, if any, does this information raise for you?
Answers
When interviewing job seekers, what am I not asking you that I should? may establish rapport, demonstrate skill, and open up important doors.
What are examples and information questions?The fundamental form of a wh- question is an informational query. opens in a fresh tab. They are used to ask for details that haven't been mentioned before. Wh- information inquiries, in contrast to yes/no inquiries, always include a presupposition.
What three categories of information queries are there?Facts in the text can directly respond to factual queries (level one). Level two inferential questions can be resolved by analyzing and interpreting particular passages of the text. Open-ended questions posed by concepts in the text are universal questions (level 3).
To know more about information questions visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/23518947
#SPJ1
How do you address a counterclaim?
Answers
To address a counterclaim, you must first acknowledge the validity of the opposing argument.
What is counterclaim?A counterclaim is a claim that refutes or contradicts an earlier claim. It is used to challenge the validity of an argument by opposing it with an opposing argument. A counterclaim is a claim that negates or disagrees with an earlier claim, generally in a debate or argument. For example, in a debate about raising taxes on the wealthy, one person may argue that increasing taxes would be unfair and the other person may counter with the claim that the wealthy should pay their fair share. Counterclaims are used to provide evidence that supports an argument or refutes an opposing argument. They are often used to strengthen an argument by introducing facts and evidence that support the claim being made. Counterclaims can also be used to weaken an opposing argument by providing evidence that refutes the opposing argument.
Once you have done that, you can then present evidence to refute their claim and explain why your own argument is more convincing. When presenting your evidence, it is important to be as clear and concise as possible. Finally, you should explain why your argument is more reasonable than the counterclaim and provide a conclusion that supports your argument.
To learn more about counterclaim
https://brainly.com/question/1689067
#SPJ4
how did Britain wage war against the Americans off the battlefield
Answers
Which of the following was not a Spanish group?
a. folsom
b. desert cultures
clovis
d. all of the above
C.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answers
Answer:
Hope it help you
Stayhomestaysafe
Plz mark my answer brainliest✍️✍️
Explanation:
d. all of the aboveThe Folsom people were not Spanish, same with the Clovis people. Desert Cultures a term for main people who lived in the desert (Native Americans) Native americans are not mexicans.
Answer:
d all of the above
Explanation:
Please check my answer!
We do not propose to divide it up equally. We do not propose a division of wealth, A. _but we propose to limit poverty that we will allow to be inflicted upon any man's family._ We will not say we are going to try to guarantee any equality or $15,000 to families. No; but we do say that one-third of the average is low enough for any one family to hold, that there should be a guarantee of a family wealth of around $5,000; enough for a home, an automobile, a radio, and the ordinary conveniences, and the opportunity to educate their children; a fair share of the income of this land thereafter to that family so there will be no such thing as merely the select to have those things, and so there will be no such thing as a family living in poverty and distress.
We have to limit fortunes. Our present plan is that we will allow no one man to own more than $50 million...We will limit hours of work. There is not any necessity of having overproduction. B. _I think all you have to do, ladies and gentlemen, is just limit the hours of work_ to such an extent as people will work only so long as is necessary to produce enough for all of the people to have what they need...
Those are the things we propose to do. "Every man a king." C._Every man to eat when there is something to eat; all to wear something when there is something to wear._ That makes us all sovereign.
Read the excerpt from a 1934 radio address by Huey Long, a senator from Louisiana, to answer the question.
Choose the highlighted example that best summarizes Long's plan for how to fight to eliminate poverty.
I think it's B. I think all you have to do, ladies and gentlemen, is just limit the hours of work
Am I correct?
Answers
Answer:
ace
Explanation:
In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or savory one) without fear of government censorship. It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.
Answer:
tysm and guud job <3
Explanation:
As technology has increased over the years candidates have employed more media technology to improve their chances of
winning. Identify the most influential ways that candidates are using the media reach voters,
A)
podcasts
B)
social media
internet ads
D)
television ads
E)
direct interviews
Answers
Answer:
B) social media
Explanation:
The answer to your question would be social media because a lot of people have a social media account that they use. They can also answer lots of questions on there.
Answer:
B- social media, C-internet ads, and D-television ads
Explanation:
the one above is only one but there's most likely three for you too
B.T.W (did these choices and they were correct)
Hope this helps :}
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Choose the correct option to complete the sentences about dynasties in Chinese Civilization.
The warring states period happened during the dynasty. The era ended when the
the dynasty was formed by
Answers
Answer: the first is shang the second qin the third emperor Qin
The Warring States Period happened during the Zhou dynasty.
The Warring States Period ended with the Qin dynasty's win.
What was the Warring States period?The Warring States period was an era in ancient Chinese history which was characterized by warfare, as well as bureaucratic and military reforms and consolidation. During the Warring States period, China became many rival states that fought for territory and dominance.
The Warring States Period began when the vassal states of the Zhou dynasty successively declared independence. Thus, the Warring States Period lasted for about 254 years.
What was Zhou dynasty?The Zhou dynasty was considered a royal dynasty of China. It also became the longest dynastic regime in Chinese history as it lasted for about 789 years. Also, the Warring States Period happened during the Zhou dynasty.
What was the Qin dynasty?The Qin dynasty was the first dynasty of Imperial China. The Qin dynasty was well known for its advances. It is known for its engineering marvels, as the construction of the Great Wall of China was initiated at that period.
The Warring States Period ended with the Qin dynasty's win, and this resulted in the creation of the first unified Chinese state under the Qin Dynasty. The Qin Dynasty was later followed by the Han Dynasty.
Hence, the answer was given and explained above.
To learn more about Warring States Period here:
https://brainly.com/question/10533811
#SPJ2
Please help me
Using the transcript of Brown's speech to the court attached below (the David Stathairn video is embedded for review) , address the following prompt in a well-written essay:
What elements of Brown's speech do you think were persuasive enough to lead to a change in thinking on slavery of Americans, at the time the speech was delivered? Cite textual evidence to support your choices.
Write your five-paragraph essay in a Word document. Make sure to double space your document and use Times New Roman, 14 point font.
I have, may it please the Court, a few words to say.
In the first place, I deny every thing but what I have already admitted, of a design on my
part to free Slaves. I intended, certainly, to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last
winter, when I went into Missouri, and there took Slaves, without the snapping of a gun on either
side, moving them through the country, and finally leaving them in Canada. I desired to have
done the same thing again, on a much larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend
murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite Slaves to rebellion, or to
make insurrection.
I have another objection, and that is, that it is unjust that I should suffer such a penalty.
Had I interfered in the manner, and which I admit has been fairly proved, – for I admire the
truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the witnesses who have testified in this case, –
had I so interfered in behalf of the Rich, the Powerful, the Intelligent, the so–called Great, or in
behalf of any of their friends, either father, mother, brother, sister, wife, or children, or any of
that class, and suffered and sacrificed what I have in this interference, it would have been all
right. Every man in this Court would have deemed it an act worthy a reward, rather than a
punishment.
This Court acknowledges too, as I suppose, the validity of the LAW OF GOD. I saw a
book kissed, which I suppose to be the BIBLE, or at least the NEW TESTAMENT, which teaches me that, "All things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to
them." It teaches me further, to "Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them." I
endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say I am yet too young to understand that GOD is any
respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done, as I have always freely
admitted I have done, in behalf of his despised poor, I have done no wrong, but RIGHT. Now, if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life, for the furtherance of the ends
of justice, and MINGLE MY BLOOD FURTHER WITH THE BLOOD OF MY CHILDREN,
and with the blood of millions in this Slave country, whose rights are disregarded by wicked,
cruel, and unjust enactments, – I say; LET IT BE DONE.
Let me say one word further: I feel entirely satisfied with the treatment I have received on
my trial. Considering all the circumstances, it has been more generous than I expected; but I feel
no consciousness of guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention, and what was not.
I never had any design against the liberty of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason,
or excite Slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do
so, but always discouraged any idea of that kind.
Let me say something, also, in regard to the statements made by some of those who were
connected with me. I hear that it has been stated by some of them, that I have induced them to
join me; but the contrary is true. I do not say this to injure them, but as regarding their weakness.
Not one but joined me of his own accord, and the greater part at their own expense. A number of
them I never saw and never had a word of conversation with, till the day they came to me, and
that was for the purpose I have stated. Now I have done.
– John Brown
Answers
Firstly, Brown denies any intention to commit murder, treason, or destruction of property, which is a powerful defense against the charges brought against him. Brown's denial shows that he was not acting with malicious intent, but rather with a specific goal in mind: the liberation of slaves. This defense helps to establish Brown's character as someone who is not a violent criminal, but rather an individual with a moral purpose.
Secondly, Brown argues that it is unjust for him to suffer such a severe penalty for his actions. He notes that if he had acted on behalf of the wealthy or powerful, his actions would have been considered worthy of reward rather than punishment. This argument is effective because it highlights the injustice of the system in which Brown is being tried. It shows that the laws are designed to protect the interests of the powerful rather than the oppressed.
Thirdly, Brown invokes the law of God to justify his actions. He argues that he was following the teachings of the Bible, which call on individuals to treat others as they would like to be treated and to remember those who are in bondage. By using this argument, Brown appeals to the court's sense of morality and their own beliefs in the divine law. This makes it harder for the court to ignore his plea for mercy and justice.
Finally, Brown ends his speech by stating that he feels no consciousness of guilt and that he never encouraged any man to commit acts of violence. This assertion emphasizes Brown's moral character and reinforces the idea that he was acting out of a sense of justice and righteousness rather than malice or personal gain.
In conclusion, John Brown's speech was persuasive because it highlighted the moral imperative of his actions, the injustice of the system, and his own character as a moral individual. By invoking the law of God and denying any intent to commit violence or insurrection, Brown effectively made the case that he was not a criminal, but a man who was acting in accordance with his conscience. These arguments would have resonated with many Americans who were sympathetic to the cause of abolition and would have helped to change their thinking on the issue of slavery.
who was imprisoned and then hanged for her quaker faith in boston in 1660, and 400 years later her statue was placed in front of the state house?
Answers
Which characteristics best describe Aaron Douglass's painting, Song of the
Towers?
A. Still and peaceful
B. Exaggerated and humorous
C. Realistic and detailed
D. Abstract and geometric
Answers
Answer:
D and C describes his painting best tbh
Answer:it is D
Explanation:
trust dawg
1. Briefly describe the scientific revolution and explain how it changed European society. Give at least two examples of key figures of the period and define their contributions. (5 points)
Answers
The way in which the Scientific Revolution changed European societies is:
°It allowed people to shift focus from religious interpretations to scientific explanations.
The term "scientific revolution" describes the resurgence of contemporary science. This can be attributed to the entire transformation of many processes by advances in a variety of academic fields, including chemistry, physics, arithmetic, astronomy, and biology. Everyone disagrees on the precise times and participants of the Scientific Revolution, which is a muddled and confused word. Many historians and scientists have been able to construct their own accounts of the revolution using their own evidence for various events. Then, according to a few of historians, it all started with Copernicus and ended with Sir Isaac Newton 150 years later.
This is a reference to the worldwide resurgence that took place in Europe during the 16th and 17th century when science was used to methodically explain occurrences.
Prior to this period, religious organizations wielded considerable authority as people looked to them for solutions to issues, but with the advent of the Scientific Revolution, science offered a superior means of understanding occurrences.
To know more about scientific revolution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14328830
#SPJ1
Write a 250- to 500-word argumentative essay on one of the listed topics. Choose a topic that you find interesting or is somehow relevant to you:
Why are there laws limiting the freedom of speech?
Why is it important to balance majority rule with minority rights?
Is the use of civil disobedience warranted in response to laws that some people feel are unjust?
What is the correct balance between protecting the freedom of religion, maintaining the separation of church and state, and protecting people from discrimination?
In the space provided below, explain a little about the topic you’ve chosen and why you chose it. In your answer, note a time in history when this issue has come up or a current event that relates to the issue. A few resources and examples are provided below, but you are also encouraged to find and use your own sources and examples. The resources provided demonstrate only a few of the many ways that the listed topics can be interpreted.
Answers
Some tips to use to write your argumentative essay are:
Make a strong opening statement.Use counterclaims to rebut the possible points of your opponentUse supporting details to show why your claims are valid.Make emotional appealsConclusionWhat is an Argumentative Essay?This refers to the type of essay that is aimed to convince a person about a particular viewpoint.
Hence, we can see that to write a good argumentative essay, you need to have a strong claim, make use of supporting details that backs up your point, make emotional appeals to show why people should support your point of view, etc.
Read more about argumentative essays here:
https://brainly.com/question/11617771
#SPJ1