Answer:
Robert James Ellicott AC, QC (born 15 April 1927) is an Australian lawyer, politician and judge. ... From 1975 to 1977, Ellicott was the 24th Attorney-General for Australia during the Malcolm Fraser ministry.
Explanation:
Who was Léonard Autié
Answer:
Explanation:
Léonard-Alexis Autié, also Autier, often referred to simply as Monsieur Léonard, was the favourite hairdresser of Queen Marie Antoinette and in 1788–1789 founded the Théâtre de Monsieur, "the first resident theatre in France to produce a year-round repertory of Italian opera."
Which of the following situations could occur if the 1st Amendment guarantee of freedom of the press were repealed? A. Powerful individuals could dictate what the media presents. B. Individuals could express their opinions using electronic media. C. Television stations could run longer news reports without sound bites. D. The Federal Government could encourage competition between politicians.
Answer:
A. Powerful individuals could dictate what the media presents.
Explanation:
Individuals with wealth and power can heavily influence what the media presents by either paying the organization or certain reporters to give them a good vision (regardless if it is true or not), or pay them to bash their opponents down. The 1st Amendment guarantees that each individual not only have their own opinions, but that the press also has the freedom to spin the story to their liking (though the more truthful the better). The repealing of the press would also affect the freedom of speech, as many people are influenced by what they see and hear on the news. Removing the media would prohibit the exercise of obtaining the needed information to either formulate or jump to the conclusion for each individual.
The repealing of the 1st Amendment would also classify the U.S. into a more heavily religious country (as if it has not been). The 1st Amendment limits how much religion can extend to influence the daily politics and governmental actions. It also allows for people to assemble (such as for voting, meeting for fellowship or group hangout, etc.) Removing the 1st Amendment would significantly remove the allowance for Americans to have large human contact with each other.
The 1st Amendment can be said to be the foundation for all other rights Americans have. With the repeal of the 1st Amendment, we already lose a large amount of rights, and the loss of the largest one would open up the way for us to lose all of our other rights.
↓What are three ways that God speaks to us today?↓
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Words We Hear
The first way God speaks is the one that’s most often associated with hearing his voice: words we hear. While we would all love to hear an ‘audible’ voice, hearing God’s voice speak in this way appears somewhat rare and particularly reserved for those moments when we’re about to step out into the traffic! The word ‘audible’ itself may indeed be a misnomer – according to my doctoral research, most of those who have experienced it, say it would not have been heard by those around them (See Waiting for God to Speak Out Loud? Think Again). Mostly it seems, the Spirit speaks to us inaudibly and internally – with a message that sounds much like our own thoughts – i.e the ‘still small voice’ of Elijah’s experience (1 Kings 19:9-13).
When God speaks in words, he may give us a single phrase or he may use full sentences. He may use a wordplay (eg. Jeremiah 1:11-12) or give us a riddle that calls us to ponder (Numbers 12:8). Often he’ll ask a question to get us thinking (1 Kings 19:9, 2 Chronicles 1:7) and as the conversation continues, he reveals something more significant later on.
2. Pictures We See
The second way God speaks is in pictures that we see. As God said through the prophet Jeremiah; “Which of them has stood in the council of the Lord to see or to hear his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18, italics mine). We hear his message through words, but we see his message through pictures.
At first, this may seem an unusual way to speak, but we need to remember picture language is the most basic of languages. When children first learn to read, we give them a picture book to practise with – not the Oxford Dictionary. Further, imagery is the most expressive way to communicate which is why it is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. Perhaps this is why God communicates in this way so often in the Scriptures, particularly in the Old Testament where dreams and visions comprise ⅓ of the content (Read: Dreams – God’s Favourite Form of Communication).
When God speaks in pictures, his message comes in dreams when we’re sleeping or visions when we’re awake. Sometimes the picture speaks symbolically and requires interpretation (see for example; The Meaning of Vehicles in Dreams). Other times, the scene is more literal.
Sometimes God’s visual messages are full of riddles, poetry and allegorical forms that are not easily interpreted or measurable. These can be compared to the parables of Jesus which use images or scenes to communicate an idea. Walton suggests that the reason word pictures are used by God is to engage the right side of our brains.1 (This idea was touched on in the podcast: Are Women Better at Hearing God’s Voice?)
Communication in picture form is a way of speaking that the Western church often finds difficult to accept. Writers like Dallas Willard2 and Wayne Grudem3 have gone so far to say it is not a valid way to hear God’s voice. The reasons are primarily historical – an unfortunate product of Reformation thinking that downplayed the so-called mystical forms of spiritual experience. In fact, imagery is the most common form of communication in the Scriptures and can be the most powerful and creative way of all (Read Why God Speaks in Dreams and Visions or listen to this podcast as an example).
3. Emotions We Feel
Finally, God’s messages may come packaged as emotions we feel. In other words, we sense what God is saying to us. The emotion of the Holy Spirit is felt physically and this in itself communicates a message.
So the presence of hope may invade us, comforting us and calling us forward (Galatians 5:22-23, 1 Corinthians 14:3). Peace becomes a guide to lead us (Colossians 3:15) and a deep-seated conviction may turn us around (John 16:8). A friend of mine with a ministry in healing often experiences a sense of sadness when she meets someone who the Holy Spirit wants to touch in a profound way.
One of the reasons why dreams can be such powerful communicators is because the emotion we experience in them becomes part of the message. Daniel felt deep anguish when he first experienced his visions (Daniel 10:1-9), John found himself weeping (Revelation 5:4) and Peter was revulsed by what he had seen in his trance (Acts 10:14). Of course on the other hand, feelings of guilt, shame, fear or condemnation are never a part of God’s communiqués to us.
So God speaks to us in words, pictures and emotions. There are other forms too – although these are not as common. In my doctoral studies, I’ve interviewed people who have heard from the Holy Spirit through the senses of taste and smell! God packages his message to us in a myriad of forms. He is a masterful communicator who knows how to get his message across to those who are listening.
Did Patrick Henry get liberty or death?
Answer:
Explanation:
"Give me liberty, or give me death!" is a quotation attributed to American politician and orator Patrick Henry from a speech he made to the Second Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775, at St. John's Church in Richmond, Virginia.
is the idea that all citizens, as well as their leaders, are equal and subject to the same requirements. (i dont know what im learning just something to do with the founding fathers or something)
Answer:Equality
Explanation:
everyone is subject to the same requirements
1. Identify and explain a significant decision made by George Washington in his personal life that had immediate consequences for the United States of America.
2. Identify and explain a significant decision made by George Washington in his personal life that continues to have consequences for the United States of America today.
3. Identify and explain a significant decision made by George Washington as president that had immediate consequences for the United States of America.
4. Identify and explain a significant decision made by George Washington as president that continues to have consequences for the United States of America today.
5. Imagine that you are a merchant in Philadelphia, which served as the nation’s capital during most of Washington’s presidency. Identify and explain a decision you might make to turn a quick profit. Then, identify and explain a decision you might make to ensure long-term growth and stability for your business.
Submit your answer here.
Answer:
Question 11.''' General Washington decided not to impose a battlefield strategy on his field commanders''. The general consensus among historians is that Washington was a mediocre military strategist at best. However, a recent study in the Academy of Management Journal cast some doubt on that consensus.
''Washington decided to oversee renovations on Mount Vernon during the most tenuous year of the Revolution.'' Imagine leading a comically outnumbered, under-resourced, and woefully unskilled force where the majority of your teenaged army marches throughout the New England snow barefoot because you can’t afford to buy them shoes in a war that—if lost—could send you to the gallows for treason.
3.'' Washington Decided not to make himself supreme ruler of the United States.'' After risking his life to lead the American Revolution—often bravely putting himself directly in the line of fire—Washington shocked the entire world by voluntarily returning all his powers to the American people and their elected representatives. It was a decision that even led his recently defeated foe, King George III, to comment that Washington was “the greatest character of his generation.” We will never know whether this decision was driven by altruism or a self-interested desire to be adored by history. What we do know is that decision aligned perfectly with the pattern of decisions Washington established
Explanation:
2. In the late 1800’s what evolution of musical opened in New York?
Answer: Jazz
Explanation: im too smart fam
To what extent can historical events and their consequences be attributed to individual actions versus broader societal forces and structural factors?
Explanation:
The extent to which historical events and their consequences can be attributed to individual actions versus broader societal forces and structural factors is a complex and debated topic in historical analysis. Different historians may have different perspectives and emphasize different factors depending on their theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and interpretations of historical evidence. Here are some key points to consider:
Individual Actions:
1. Great individuals and their actions: Some historical events can be significantly influenced by the actions and decisions of specific individuals who played pivotal roles. These individuals may have had unique qualities, skills, or leadership abilities that shaped the course of events.
2. Agency and contingency: Individual actions can introduce contingencies and unforeseen consequences that may alter the course of history. The decisions made by individuals can have ripple effects and shape the trajectory of events.
Societal Forces and Structural Factors:
1. Social, economic, and political structures: Broader societal forces such as economic systems, political ideologies, social hierarchies, and cultural norms can shape the possibilities and constraints within which individuals operate. These structural factors can influence the choices available to individuals and impact the outcomes of historical events.
2. Collective actions and movements: Historical events often arise from collective actions and movements driven by societal forces such as revolutions, social movements, or shifts in public opinion. These movements are fueled by the actions and collaboration of many individuals, highlighting the significance of collective agency.
3. Long-term trends and systemic factors: Structural factors can shape long-term trends and historical developments. Factors like technological advancements, demographic changes, and geopolitical shifts can have profound impacts that transcend individual actions.
It is important to recognize that historical events are often the result of a complex interplay between individual actions and broader societal forces. The relative influence of these factors may vary depending on the specific context, the scale of analysis, and the specific event being studied. Historians strive to understand and evaluate the interactions between individual agency and structural forces to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of historical events.
Answer:Most historians of sociology agree that the historical event that lead to the establishment of sociology was the Industrial Revolution. However, the French Revolution also played a critical part in the establishment of sociology.
Explanation:
why is Hummurabi’s code important?
a. It was the first time any ruler or society attempted to use a written law that applied to everyone.
b. It was a major step forward for civilization because it protected the weak from the strong.
c. Hummurabi based his codes of law on the religious principles of sumerians.
D. many laws in use today came from Hummurabi’s code.
Answer:
A. It was the first time any ruler or society attempted to use a written law that applied to everyone.
Explanation:
Why did many not consider the emancipation proclamation as legal based on the wording?
12 points...
Also, if you answer correctly, I will mark you as brainliest.....
Answer:
From the first day of the Civil War, slaves had acted to secure their own liberty. The Emancipation Proclamation confirmed that the insistance that the war for the union must become a war for freedom. It added moral force to the union cause and strengthened them through the military as well as politically.
Explanation:
Which of the following was NOT part of the Dred Scott decision from the Supreme Court in 1857?
A. Dred Scott was not a “citizen” according to the Constitution
B. Dred Scott should not have crossed state lines into a slave state
C. Dred Scott was still considered the “property” of his owner
D. The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional by trying to limit slavery in the West
The statement which is not a part of the Dred Scott decision from the Supreme Court in 1857:
Dred Scott was still considered the “property” of his owner.Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.
What did the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v Sandford 1857)?Enslaved persons could not anticipate any protection from the federal government or the courts because they were not citizens of the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court said in this case. The ruling added that Congress lacked the power to outlaw slavery on federal property.
Dred Scott, a Black slave, and his wife Harriet filed a claim for freedom in St. Louis Circuit Court in 1846. They said that they were free since they lived in a free country where slavery was not permitted. The chances were on their side. They had been living at Fort Snelling, which was then in Wisconsin's free territory, with their captor, an army medic.
Learn more about Dred Scott v Sandford 1857, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29628567
#SPJ2
Where Is the Forest of Dean
Explanation:
The Forest of Dean is a geographical, historical and cultural region in the western part of the county of Gloucestershire, England.
Forest of Dean, ancient royal forest of oak and beech in western Gloucestershire, England, covering an area of about 26,000 ac (10,500 ha) between the Rivers Severn and Wye. It became a National Forest Park administered by the Forestry Commission in 1938.
Hope my answer helps you✌️
Mark BRAINLIEST
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional questions.
Online Content: Site 1
Why was the Gadsden Purchase so important to the development of New Mexico and the United States?
Answer:
Gadsden's Purchase was significant in the development of New Mexico and the United States because it supplied property for a southern transcontinental line and aimed to address post-Mexican-American War issues.
Explanation:
You are an archaeologist investigating the remains of a Native American settlement in Texas. You find artifacts including stone spearheads, pottery shards, and animal bones. Write a paragraph describing your conclusions about the people who once lived in this settlement.
Answer:
The Native Americans who lived in this settlement were a hunter-gatherer society. The spearheads and animal bones suggest that they hunted large game, while the pottery shards indicate that they gathered plants and fruits. They likely lived in small huts or shelters made from sticks and hides.
Explanation:
That's my conclusion, hope it helped!
Based on the artifacts found at this Native American settlement, it appears that the people who lived here were generally hunter-gatherers, as evidenced by the stone spearheads that were used for hunting and the animal bones, which likely came from hunted animals.
The pottery shards indicate that the people likely had some level of craft as well as trade, which is typical in larger, more established hunter-gatherer settlements.
It is likely that the people who lived here also farmed as well, given the relative abundance of pottery that likely would have been used for in-home food preparation and storage.
To know more about Native American settlement, , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30677723
#SPJ3
what obstacles do you think a women would have to overcome as a soldier in the American Revolution?
Answer: They would probably be met with a lot of opposition but i think they could still help the war effort as soldiers.
Explanation:
For one women at the time the main roles were household jobs such as cooking and cleaning, so learning things entirely out of their element such as combat would probably be dificult for them but they could learn with combat training.
something else would be a societal standard, these women would most likely get harassed and joked about (much like minority soldiers)..
Lastly, learning to fight would probably be the most difficult as males of the time mostly did the hunting and fought in wars at the time meaning they were more acustomed to seeing death and destruction in war. Along with this the possibility of rapings from the enemy would be eminent, as POWs were a thing and females would give the enemy something to do as a form of torture.
But beyond all this there was indeed a female patriot named deborah sampson I would reccomend you check her story out. Along with this hundreds of women helped fuel the war effort by tended to wounded, cooking for troops, and creating uniforms and gear for the troops.
Thanks for reading all this lol, hope this helps you and have a great day :)
How did electricity and steel work together to revolutionize transportation?
Steel and electricity worked together to revolutionize transportation by helping power trains. Steel was regularly used to help build train tracks to connect the US. As well electricity was used on the electrified third rail to power trains.
Smaller and quicker engines were constructed out of steel, and electricity was a novel kind of energy that could be transformed into motion.
What kind of energy does the engine transform?Similar to engines with drive shafts, the engine transforms the thermal energy into mechanical energy. An internal-combustion engine is a device that uses combustion within the same component that generates mechanical energy. Internal-combustion engines are those found in gasoline or diesel-powered automobiles.
How does energy become electricity?A sequence of blades installed on a rotor shaft in a turbine generator are pushed by a flowing fluid, such as air, water, steam, combustion gases, or water. A generator's rotor shaft revolves or spins due to the fluid's force on the blades. In turn, the generator transforms the rotor's mechanical (kinetic) energy into electrical energy.
To Know more about motion.
https://brainly.com/question/22810476
#SPJ2
When did time begin?
Answer:
When people began to count it
Explanation:
Imagine you are a soldier after the American Revolutionary war. The Articles of Confederation are in place and the government has no money to pay you for your work in the war. You are about to lose your land and home. Do you agree with the people that participated in Shay's Rebellion? Why or Why not?
Shay's Rebellion was a reaction to the financial and political difficulties faced by the early United States after the American Revolution. The soldiers who fought in the war, including the imagined soldier in this scenario, were owed large amounts of money by the government and were on the verge of losing their homes and land. It can be understood that they might agree with the participants in Shay's Rebellion as they were facing similar financial difficulties and wanted their rights to be protected.
However, it can also be argued that resorting to violence and rebellion is not an appropriate solution to address the issues faced by the government and the citizens. A more reasonable solution would be to seek political and legal means to address the grievances and work towards a more stable and just system.
Who is Martin Luther King, Jr.
Answer: Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who was one of the most prominent leaders in the American civil rights movement from 1955 until his assassination on April 4, 1968. Martin Luther King, Jr. was also a civil rights legend. In the mid-1950s, King led the movement to end segregation and counter prejudice in the United States through the means of peaceful protest.
Answer:
Martin Luther king Jr was a social activist and baptist
minister in the united states' in the 1950s and 60s .
he was the right to vote.
You are a scout in the 1839s who makes a living by guiding settlers to Oregon. Write a two-paragraph “advertisement” telling people why they should move to Oregon. and why they should choose you to guide them.
Paragraph:
I recommend you come to Oregon. Oregon is a wonderful state known for its gorgeous landscapes. Oregon has a beautiful coastline and if you are lucky you might spot some whales in the distance. Oregon is a very cool and calming place to be.
In my opinion, Oregon is the best place to live. It has everything you need. Everyone is so friendly here and I can help you get to know the place. I have been living here for a while now and I know everything there is to know about Oregon. I am a scout and I give tours to all the newcomers they loved the place ever since they laid eyes on it. I hope you will come to Oregon sometime soon and when you do I will be happy to show you around the place.
Notes:
I hope this helps!
Which statements best describe the beliefs of Patriots during the colonial era?
Select each correct answer.
A. They believed that the British government knew what was best for the colonies.
B. They believed the colonies were capable of governing themselves.
C. They believed that war should be avoided at all costs.
D. They believed that freedom was important.
What is "nepotism"?
A. When a government official appoints a friend to a job
B. When a government official appoints a family member to a job
C. When a government official is promoted
D. When a government official is illegally elected
Please with description
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Nepotism tends to refer to the appointment of family members to a job or position of power where as, cronysim refers to appointing a friend or associate. Both fall under favoritism.
Tom and Elise went scuba diving while on vacation. Tom went down 17 feet while Elise went down 12 feet. Explain what this means in relation to the positions of these numbers on the number line. What is the value of the surface of the water? Who is closer to the surface of the water?
Answer:
Elise
Explanation:
On a number line, -19 is closer to 0 than -25 and since 0 feet down is the surface of the water, Elise is closer to the surface of the water.
Social Security provides income to retired, unemployed, and disabled workers. Benefits are based on how long a worker was employed. The comments below are from a discussion between two speakers with different perspectives on the future of Social Security.
Speaker A:
Social Security is now facing a real problem. Soon the system will be paying more in benefits to retirees than it is collecting from payroll taxes. If we don’t fix this situation, the system will soon have nothing left. The best solution is to stop paying benefits to retirees with high incomes.
Speaker B:
What you propose is unfair. Workers pay into Social Security their whole working lives. After they retire, they are entitled to receive benefits based on what they have paid into the system. Even if they have high incomes, they are entitled to benefits from their own payments.
How do Speakers A and B differ?Immersive Reader
Speaker A believes too much money is paid to rich individuals; Speaker B sees the wealthy as the main drivers of the economy.
Speaker A fears Social Security will soon not have enough money to pay anyone; Speaker B feels retirees are entitled to benefits they have paid for.
Speaker A would rather invest in schools than pay retirees; Speaker B believes retirees are more in need of government help.
Speaker A believes the current system is unfair; Speaker B argues the system is basically fair.
Answer:
Speaker A differs from B because of one reason, which is this story: money
"A" has a good point by thinking that if you have enough money to buy a house on the spot, you shouldn't need to gain Social Security. But heres one thing "A" doesn't think about: what if said person runs out of money. The point of Social Security is to give money to the people that paid their taxes and if your retired. If your retired, you don't have a job, which means the only money you would be getting back is Social Security. Now, this starts to make it sound like im siding with "B" yes I am. However, I think to even this out, lower the amount of Social Security you get so both "A" and "B" get an even share of their opinions.
(hope my mindset was in the right place for this question)
Speakers A and B differ on the point of whether Social Security is a liability or it is justifiable, hence the option B is correct option.
Social SecuritySocial Security is the income provided by the Government to retired, unemployed and disabled workers. These benefits are essential for their financial needs.
Speaker A suggest that Social security is a liability on Governement as it drains out money, the solution A provides is to stop providing benefits to retirees with high income.
Speaker B on the other hand suggest that Social security is the right of workers, as they have paid for this welfare in their whole working years. So even if the benefits is going to high income retirees, social security should not stop because it is their own money.
Therefore, the correct option is B which says "Speaker A fears Social Security will soon not have enough money to pay anyone; Speaker B feels retirees are entitled to benefits they have paid for."
Learn more about Social Security here:
https://brainly.com/question/25226643
Complete the boxes below the timeline. Name the event for each year and add a simple visual.
Note that the above is a historical timeline. The key events that occurred in the above periods are given below.
What are the key events in the above historical timeline?450 BCE: Greek historian Herodotus writes "The Histories"
404 BCE: Athens loses Peloponnesian War to Sparta
400 BCE: Construction of the Acropolis in Athens is completed
350 BCE: Plato founds the Academy in Athens
338 BCE: Battle of Chaeronea, Philip II of Macedon defeats Greek city-states
336 BCE: Alexander the Great becomes king of Macedon after the assassination of his father, Philip II
334 BCE: Alexander the Great begins his conquest of the Persian Empire
300 BCE: Euclid writes "Elements," a foundational work in geometry.
Learn mor about historical timeline:
https://brainly.com/question/8664399
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
according to the quaestion the following answers are the timelines asked
Please I really need help with this
Answer:2. Bill goes to the committee.
4. Bill is referred to the Senate
6. Bill is sent to the President
If approved, the bill becomes a law.
Explanation:
Question 4 of 5
The U.S. Constitution creates a balance between the state and national
governments. This is an example of
OA. federalism
OB. checks and balances
C. representative democracy
OD. separation of powers
SUBMIT
Answer:
C. Representative democracy
Answer:
C. Representative Democracy
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Please help 10 points each but beware if you use my points for no reason or put a wrong answer I'll report you
Answer:
The correct answer is B; Secretary of state.
Answer:
I want to say secretary of state
Explanation:
WILL GIVE BRAILIEST Which sentence best describes the Battle of Bunker Hill?
Responses
A: It was a victory for the Patriots after they were able to sink many British ships crossing the Charles River.
B: The Patriots had plenty of gunpowder, but were defeated by a British naval bombardment.
C: The British attacked head-on and eventually won the hills, but only after losing more than a thousand men.
D: British soldiers ran out of gunpowder and fled after the Patriots started to advance across the Charles River.
Answer: D
Explanation: Beacause that is simply what happened
Answer: C, I think
Explanation: Because it's popularly known as "The Battle of Bunker Hill," bloody fighting took place throughout a hilly landscape of fenced pastures that were situated across the Charles River from Boston. So I'm just assuming that's the correct answer, I apologize if it's wrong
Was Hernan Cortes as successful as his counterparts? (other explorers like himself)
Answer:
Yes, Hernan Cortes was successful as well. Other explorers had their own conquests though. He succeeded in taking over the Aztecs and claiming Mexico on behalf of Spain.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
he was as successful because he was the one that made the collapse of the Aztec empire