One of the least helpful things for supporting interpretations would be to ignore evidence that contradicts your argument.
A strong argument requires the use of strong evidence and the ability to recognize and account for evidence that may not support your interpretation.Evidence can be anything from quotes, data, statistics, or even visual aids that help illustrate your point.
However, some people may try to use evidence selectively to support their argument while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. This is called cherry-picking evidence, and it can undermine the credibility of your argument.Another unhelpful approach is to oversimplify complex issues or ideas. Oversimplifying means making something too simple or easy to understand.
This can often mean leaving out important information or context, which can make your argument seem incomplete or misleading.To support interpretations, it is essential to consider all the relevant information and approach the issue or idea in a balanced, objective way. A balanced approach involves analyzing the evidence from different perspectives and taking into account opposing views as well.
It also requires making connections between different pieces of evidence and explaining how they support your argument.To sum up, ignoring evidence that contradicts your argument and oversimplifying complex issues are among the least helpful approaches to supporting interpretations. A more balanced and objective approach that takes into account all relevant evidence and perspectives is much more effective.
To know more about helpful visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26534128
#SPJ11
Polybius attributed rome's rise to greatness to its army, the religiosity of its people, and its _____.
Polybius, the Greek historian and political philosopher, attributed Rome's rise to greatness to its army, the religiosity of its people, &its system of government.
Firstly, Rome's army played a crucial role in its ascent to power. Polybius believed that Rome's military prowess and discipline were unparalleled. The Roman army was renowned for its organization, training, & strategic innovation.
The legions, with their well-disciplined soldiers and efficient command structure, allowed Rome to conquer and maintain control over vast territories. Polybius emphasized the importance of Rome's ability to adapt & learn from its enemies, incorporating their military tactics and technologies into its own strategies.
Secondly, Polybius highlighted the religiosity of the Roman people as a crucial factor in their rise. He observed that the Romans were deeply devoted to their gods and religious practices, believing that their success was directly tied to divine favor.
The Roman state religion played a central role in the lives of its citizens, with rituals and ceremonies regularly performed to appease and honor the gods. Polybius argued that this religious fervor instilled a sense of moral responsibility, duty, and cohesion among the people.
To know more about Greek history
brainly.com/question/232317
#SPJ4
Two countries with similar resources want to grow bananas. which country has an absolute advantage for growing bananas? why does this country have an absolute advantage?
The ability of a party to provide an item or service more effectively than its competitors is referred to as the principle of absolute advantage in economics.
How do you find an absolute advantage?Look at the greater of the two numbers for each product to compute absolute advantage. Canada has the overwhelming advantage in lumber since one worker can produce more lumber (40 tons versus 30 tons).
The ability of a party (a person, corporation, or country) to provide a good or service more effectively than its competitors is referred to as the principle of absolute advantage in economics.
Thus, Country A would have an absolute advantage as it produces more bananas.
For more information about Absolute Advantage refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/13221821
Answer:
Country A
It can produce more bananas
HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS!!!
Answer:
1st one b 2nd one a
Explanation:
heres a numonic device: think of feudal as factories cuz it begins with an f
the public defender system was started where in 1914?
The public defender system was started in 1914 in Los Angeles, California.
What is a public defender?
A public defender is an attorney appointed to represent persons who cannot afford to hire a lawyer. They represent individuals accused of crimes in criminal defense cases. The public defender’s office was established to ensure that indigent defendants receive effective legal representation under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Public defenders handle most criminal cases in the United States.
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is one of the ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. It was ratified in 1791 and provides several rights and protections for individuals accused of crimes. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the following rights: the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to an impartial jury, the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, the right to confront witnesses, the right to compel witnesses to testify on one's behalf, and the right to legal representation. These rights are essential components of due process and ensure that individuals accused of crimes are afforded fair and equitable treatment within the criminal justice system.
Learn more about the Sixth Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/3940509
#SPJ11
Where will we go when we die? What is it like there?
Answer: That's an odd question, but if you're good God will accept you, you'll go to Heaven. If not, He's got a special place with Satan.
Its basically like christmas, you be good you get rewarded, if not you get.. coal if you're lucky.
what forced turkish nomadic pastoralists out of central asia in the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries?
Answer:
It's the Han people, or China, the Turks who lived in Central Asia in the 11th and 12th centuries were called Xiongnus, who were defeated in a battle with the Xiongnus, the mainstream Chinese people, and were pushed back to the Anatolian Peninsula and formed what is now the Turks
Explica la importancia de las tres (3) instituciones administrativas españolas en América que consideras más importantes. Justifica la respuesta con argumentos concretos.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Las tres instituciones administrativas españolas en América que considero más importantes, son las siguientes.
1) El Consejo de las Indias. Fue establecido en 1523 y la idea de su creación era tener una oficina en donde se pudieran plantear y resolver todos los asuntos que iban surgiendo en las Américas.
2) Capitanías Generales. Estas capitanías hacían las funciones de lo que hoy serían los gobiernos estatales o municipales de una región. Se nombraron a a prominentes y experimentados militares para que gobernaran y decidieran sobre asuntos militares y civiles en cada región asignada.
3) El Cabildo. Esta institución servía como un foro de expresión para los miembros de la sociedad, en donde se aceptaba que expresaran su opinión.
How did the Spanish mission system impact Native American civilizations?
O It decreased the popularity of slavery.
O It prevented the spread of diseases.
O It increased the popularity of Judaism.
O It introduced the teachings of Christianity.
The Spanish mission system had a significant impact on Native American civilizations, and the most significant impact was the introduction of Christianity.
The Spanish missionaries aimed to convert Native Americans to Christianity and built missions throughout the American Southwest and California. These missions were intended to serve as centers for evangelization, education, and economic development.
The Native Americans who joined the missions were required to convert to Christianity, adopt Spanish culture, and abandon their traditional way of life. They were forced to abandon their own religion, language, and cultural practices, which led to the loss of their cultural identity. Additionally, they were forced to work for the Spanish as laborers and were subjected to harsh treatment, which led to a decline in their population.
Therefore, the Spanish mission system had a profound impact on Native American civilizations, and it led to the destruction of their culture and way of life. While it may have introduced some positive aspects, such as education and agriculture, the negative effects were more significant.
To know more about civilizations click here:
brainly.com/question/12207844
#SPJ4
Who was Batman’s biggest failure?
Answer:
The Death Of Damian
Does Not Keep Gotham City Safe
Let Stephanie Brown Become Robin
Letting Azrael Become Batman
Not Willing To Become Batman Again
Not Protecting Barbara From Being Shot
Not Saving Alfred
The Death Of Jason Todd
The Death Of His Parents
Letting His Demons Run His Life
Explanation:
These are my top 10
Describe the development of capitalism since the Columbian exchange?
You can take your time I don't need a huge answer!!!
Mercantilism, an economic theory that rejected free trade and promoted government regulation of the economy for the purpose of enhancing state power, defined the economic policy of European colonizing countries.
what did europeans monarchs seek to presevere to ensure that their neighbors did not become strong enough to threaten their borders
European monarchs sought to preserve a balance of power among their neighbors to ensure that no single country became strong enough to threaten their borders.
This approach, known as the balance of power theory, aimed to prevent the dominance of any one nation in Europe. Monarchs recognized that an overly powerful neighbor could pose a significant threat to their own sovereignty and security.
To maintain this balance, they engaged in strategic alliances, diplomacy, and, at times, military interventions. By forming alliances with weaker states or supporting coalitions against potential aggressors, European monarchs aimed to prevent any single power from becoming too dominant
The preservation of the balance of power allowed monarchs to safeguard their territories, protect their interests, and maintain stability in the region, reducing the risk of conflicts that could directly threaten their own borders.
Learn more about stability
https://brainly.com/question/31577107
#SPJ11
Read the excerpt from the Atlantic Charter.
The President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister, Mr. Churchill, . . . respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live.
The excerpt states that the United States and Great Britain agree that people have the right to make
.
Answer:
The excerpt states that the United States and Great Britain agree that people have the right to make their own political decisions. The idea of democracy has been unequivocally upheld by countries like the United States and Great Britain through centuries.Nov 8, 2019
Explanation:
The idea of democracy has been unequivocally upheld by countries like the United States and Great Britain through centuries.
The excerpt states that the United States and Great Britain agree that people have the right to make their own choices about the type of government they want to live under.
How can you summarize the Atlantic Charter?The Charter outlined the ideal outcomes of the conflict: no territorial expansion, no unauthorized territorial changes, self-determination, the restoration of self-government to those who had lost it, a relaxation of trade restrictions, and international cooperation to ensure better economic and social conditions.
It declared openly the United States and Great Britain's sentiment of unity against Axis aggression. It outlined President Roosevelt's Wilsonian-inspired plan for the postwar era, one that would emphasize self-determination, collective security, disarmament, and more open trade.
Learn more about the Atlantic Charter here:
https://brainly.com/question/20515280
#SPJ7
How did Ronald Reagan's presidency change the economic reality
for African Americans?
During Ronald Reagan's presidency, African Americans were not fortunate enough to have any economic gains. In reality, they were some of the most vulnerable people of the era, primarily due to Reagan's adherence to the laissez-faire economic principles that he believed would benefit all people.
However, the economic policies of Ronald Reagan did not take into account the financial challenges that African Americans faced at the time. In essence, his laissez-faire economic policies perpetuated the racial wealth gap, leading to African Americans struggling to make ends meet.African Americans were subjected to marginalization and oppression under Reagan's economic policy, with poverty rates hitting 40 percent. The causes of this were due to Reagan's reluctance to introduce policies that would directly help African Americans.
Reagan believed that by reducing taxes, creating jobs, and stimulating the economy, every American would reap the benefits, including African Americans. Unfortunately, the tax reductions mostly benefitted the wealthy, and it increased the wealth gap. Reaganomics ensured the rich became richer, and the poor got poorer.
In conclusion, Reagan's economic policy exacerbated the economic crisis for African Americans. African Americans experienced a double disadvantage of economic inequality and racial discrimination. Reagan's policies had minimal impact on the African American population as they remained economically vulnerable.
To know more about economic visit :
https://brainly.com/question/32861646
#SPJ11
Beginning in 1868 the new Meiji government of Japan created one the most modern nation states in the world. Which theme best relates to this statement? USE YOUR THEME LIST. Ecological Diffusion Cultural Syncretism Turning Point Inequity
The theme that best relates to the statement on the new Meiji government of Japan in 1868, is C. Turning Point.
What is Turning Point?A turning point is a particular, noteworthy time when change starts to occur. At this point, the previous way of doing things changes and becomes different.
From 1868, when the new Meiji government of Japan took over, they were able to create a new and modern nation state in the world. It can therefore be concluded that the takeover of the Meiji government was the turning point that led to Japan being modernized.
Find out more on the Meiji Government at https://brainly.com/question/2059069
#SPJ1
What countries comprised the Triple Entente?
Great Britain, France, Spain
Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy
France, Great Britain, Russia
Russia, France, Germany
Answer:
France, Great Britain, Russia
The countries that comprised the Triple Entente are France, Great Britain and Russia. The correct option is c.
What is Triple Entente?The Triple Entente describes the informal understanding between the Russian Empire, the French Third Republic, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland as well as Romania, which joined later. It was built upon the Franco-Russian Alliance of 1894, the Entente Cordiale of 1904 between Paris and London, and the Anglo-Russian Entente of 1907. It formed a powerful counterweight to the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The Triple Entente, unlike the Triple Alliance or the Franco-Russian Alliance itself, was not an alliance of mutual defence.
The Franco-Japanese Treaty of 1907 was a key part of building a coalition as France took the lead in creating alliances with Japan, Russia, and with Britain. Japan wanted to raise a loan in Paris, so France made the loan contingent on a Russo-Japanese agreement and a Japanese guarantee for France's strategically vulnerable possessions in Indochina. Britain encouraged the Russo-Japanese rapprochement.
Thus was built the Triple Entente coalition that fought World War I.
Learn more about Entente, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29760172
#SPJ2
HELPPPP !!!!
Which of the follow was not a reason for the Great Depression?
O A Crisis in the farm sector
O The availability of easy credit
O Unequal distribution of income
O Involvement in World War One
Answer:
A
Explanation:
please mark me the brainliest
who fired at british soldiers from the woods at the battle of concord? french troops militiamen native americans politicians
Militiamen fired at British soldiers from the woods at the Battle of Concord. Option 2 is Correct.
However, it's worth noting that the Battle of Concord was fought during the American Revolutionary War, and it involved British soldiers encountering resistance from American colonists who were armed and fighting for their independence. So, any of the options could potentially be correct. Militiamen are citizens who are trained and organized to provide military service to their country in times of emergency or war.
They are typically part-time soldiers who are not full-time members of the regular armed forces, but who are called upon to serve when necessary. In the United States, the National Guard is the primary organization responsible for maintaining a militia force. Militias have a long history in many countries, and are often associated with defending against external threats or upholding domestic order. Option 2 is Correct.
Learn more about Militiamen visit: brainly.com/question/30783469
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
who fired at british soldiers from the woods at the battle of concord?
1. french troops
2. militiamen
3. native americans
4. politicians
Troop 3456 designed a model of their favorite type of tent. The model did not have a bottom.
A triangular prism has a rectangular base with length of 10 inches and height of 8 inches. 2 rectangular sides have a base of 10 inches and height of 5 inches. The triangular sides have a base of 8 inches and height of 3 inches.
What is the surface area of the model?
108 square in.
124 square in.
148 square in.
204 square in.
Answer:
124 square in.
Explanation:
Just a hunch ;-;
Answer:
124 square in
Explanation:
I just did the quiz and got 100% I swear its right, 120% sure
Write a short paragraph 3- 5 sentences (Will mark brainiest)
What do you think is a valid reason for a country to go to war? Read the reasons below and decide whether you think each reason is valid or not valid.
to defend territory and people
to protect an ally from invasion
to gain territory or resources
to stand up for an idea
to defend human rights and punish wrongdoing
Choose one of the justifications you feel is valid. What are the reasons you feel this way? What are the reasons you rejected one of the justifications?
For what ideas might a country be willing to fight?
For what resources might a country be willing to fight? Why?
If you believe there are never any valid reasons for going to war under any circumstances, explain why you hold this viewpoint.
Answer: I hope this works! :)
I believe that a valid reason for a country to go to war is to defend human rights and punish wrongdoing. When a country or group of people are subjected to oppression and human rights violations, it is the responsibility of the international community to take action. In such cases, diplomacy and sanctions may not be enough, and military action may be necessary to protect innocent lives and prevent further atrocities. I rejected the justification of gaining territory or resources as it promotes imperialism and aggression. A country should not be allowed to go to war simply to acquire more land or resources at the expense of others. A country may be willing to fight for ideas such as democracy, freedom, and equality. They may also be willing to fight for resources such as oil, minerals, and water, which are essential for their economic growth and survival. However, resorting to war should always be a last resort and all peaceful means should be exhausted before military action is taken. can you put this in easier terms
Participants in the bargh, chen, and burrows (1996) study who were exposed to rude words __________.
In a study of the ways in which situations influence our actions, participants in the Bargh, Chen, and Burrows (1996) study who were exposed to rude words were more likely to subsequently interrupt a conversation.
The correct option is B.
Who was Bargh, Chen, and Burrows ?The renowned study by Bargh, Chen, and Burrows from 1996, in which subjects unknowingly exposed to the age stereotype walked more slowly after leaving the lab, played a significant role in defining this viewpoint. Here, we report two studies designed to duplicate the earlier research.
What is the automaticity of social behavior?Automaticity is the control of one's internal psychological processes by events and stimuli in their immediate environment, frequently without their knowledge or awareness of such control; automatic phenomena are typically contrasted with those processes that are consciously or intentionally put into operation.
What is the automaticity in psychology?Automatic actions and ideas are those that happen effectively without requiring conscious direction or supervision. There's an excellent explanation why the majority of our thoughts and actions are automatic or contain automatic elements.
To know more about Bargh, Chen, and Burrows visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14617997
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is:
In a study of the ways in which situations influence our actions, participants in the Bargh, Chen, and Burrows (1996) study who were exposed to rude words
a. were less likely to subsequently interrupt a conversation.
b. were more likely to subsequently interrupt a conversation.
c. were in a worse mood than those exposed to polite words.
d. were less likely to want to participate in another study.
Which of these civilizations would you want to live in and why? Mohenjo-Daro/Harappa group.
Answer: The Harrapan Civilzation
Explanation: I would have liked to live in the Harappan civilization. It was the largest of the four great ancient civilizations. The architecture of the buildings were creative and very advanced. They were so advanced that they had modern sanitation systems like baths, sinks, toilets all in the homes. The Harappan people even had some knowledge about teeth!
why do you think the art and literature of the 1920s had such a diverse range of styles?
Answer: different people
Explanation:
the hittites played an important role in the history of the middle east because they
The Hittites played an important role in the history of the Middle East because of their military might, political alliances, and cultural influence.
The Hittites were known for their formidable army and warfare strategies, which allowed them to expand their territory and establish a powerful empire that dominated the region for centuries. They also formed strategic alliances with other powerful states, such as Egypt and Assyria, which helped to strengthen their political influence in the Middle East.
Furthermore, the Hittites had a significant cultural impact on the region, particularly in the field of metallurgy. They were skilled in the production and trade of metals such as bronze and iron, which contributed to the development of new technologies and advancements in various industries.
Overall, the Hittites played a crucial role in shaping the political and cultural landscape of the Middle East, leaving a lasting legacy that is still studied and admired today.
Know more about the Hittites here:
https://brainly.com/question/537595
#SPJ11
“The Role of the Church was the main reason why there was so little change in Medicine in Middle Ages”. How far do u agree?
I need a conclusion for that statement.
Plz help me ASAP.
I have an exam plzzzzzzzz
Answer: Medicine was inseparable from religious dogmas and the church.
Explanation:
The church was an integral part of everyday medieval life. She was involved in every segment of life, including medicine. There was no progress in medieval medicine since the church ruled out a scientific approach. All knowledge about medicine was taken from antiquity, and there was no progress in absorbing new knowledge in that context. Medicine in the Middle Ages was related to the spiritual; it was based on the belief in the spiritual's inseparability from the material, that is, the body from the soul.
Diseases were attributed to sin either individually or collectively, like the outbreak of epidemics. The fight against diseases was often reduced to the individual, the family took care of the patient, which was almost a common method in the Middle Ages. Progress was recorded only in the twelfth century with the founding of a university and the translation of certain texts from the Arabic language.
Which group of women worked as control tower operators, radio operators, and mechanics?
Answer:
Women's Army Corps
Explanation:
Explain what is learned by the actions of the characters in the excerpt. The lottery was a happy occasion because the men told jokes, the children laughed, and the women were able to exchange gossip. The lottery may not have been a happy occasion because the men smiled rather than laughed, and the children were apparently very hesitant to join their families when it started. Most of the villagers were indifferent about the lottery since it was held every year, and they already knew the outcome this time. Most of the villagers were ready to do away with the lottery since it was an outdated custom, carried over from years past
The actions of the characters in the excerpt reveal contrasting perspectives on the nature of the lottery. While some characters perceive it as a happy occasion filled with laughter and gossip, others view it with hesitancy and indifference. Additionally, there is a faction among the villagers who are ready to abolish the lottery, considering it an outdated tradition.
The actions of the characters in the excerpt provide insights into their perceptions and attitudes towards the lottery. On one hand, some characters see the lottery as a joyous event. The men telling jokes, children laughing, and women exchanging gossip suggest an atmosphere of merriment. This indicates that these individuals perceive the lottery as a lighthearted occasion.
On the other hand, there are indications that the lottery may not be as happy as initially portrayed. The fact that the men only smiled instead of laughing and the children's hesitancy to join their families during the lottery raise questions about the true nature of the event. These subtle cues suggest an underlying sense of unease and reluctance associated with the lottery.
Furthermore, the villagers' attitudes towards the lottery vary. Some villagers are indifferent because they are accustomed to the annual event and already know the outcome. This suggests a sense of resignation and acceptance of the lottery's inevitability.
However, another group of villagers is ready to do away with the lottery. They view it as an outdated custom that has lost its relevance over the years. Their readiness to abolish the lottery implies a recognition of its potential harm or insignificance in contemporary society.
Overall, the actions of the characters reveal a range of perspectives on the lottery, reflecting different understandings and reactions to this long-standing tradition.
Learn more about tradition here :
https://brainly.com/question/1065362
#SPJ11
Explain how the Battle of Saratoga was a turning point in the American Revolutionary War.
The Battle of Saratoga was a major turning point for both countries mostly because this battle was fought for the freedom of the American colonies and for France to become allies with America. During the war many other nations supported the Americans with food, money and most importantly with a powerful Navy.
What is the domain and range of the square root function graphed below
Answer:
Domain: \(x\leq 7\)
Range: \(y\geq 3\)
During the cold war, several new communist states were established, including the
Answer: After a war against Japanese occupation and a respectful war coming about in a Communist triumph, the People's Republic of China was built in 1949. Communist states were too set up in Cambodia, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam.
Explanation:
write a short note on the art and architecture during Shah jahan's Reign
Answer:
During his period architecture reached its highest water mark in India. As observed by the noted art critic Percy Brown, “As it was the proud statement of Augustus that he found Rome built of bricks and left it of marble, similarly Shah Jahan had found the Mughal cities of stones, he left them of marble”.
Explanation:
Shah Jahani's architectural style of the building is India that flourished during the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan. Taj Mahal in Agra, India is a prime example of this type of architecture. architecture is marked by symmetry and balance between the parts of the building, with white marble become the primary choice of building materials.
Another example of Shah Jahan period architecture found in the Red Fort in Delhi, India. "Hall of Public Audience" and "Hall of Private Audience", which housed the Peacock Throne, two more examples of the architecture of this period.
Under the reign of Shah Jahan, however, there is an emphasis unprecedented in Mughal architecture in a graceful line structure and a harmonious balance between all the parts. Shah Jahan's personal involvement in architecture and urban planning appears to have motivated others, especially high-ranking ladies of the court, to build