Which would be an example of an individual occupational crime?
Answers
Answer: Occupational crimes encompass a wide range of criminal acts, but the most common include white collar offenses, such as embezzlement, money laundering, tax fraud, and the misuse of company information or property.
Related Questions
wassup ze nice ta hear from you how r u
Answers
Explanation:
come on my Google meet for chat ...
THE MEETING CODE IS:-
pcn-veih-fjy
plzz come fast plzzz
plz come on Google meet...8
Answer:
Nothing, just the normal routine life, but glad to have summer break!
What extent should the background characteristics of offenders (e.g. family, education, prior military service, prior criminal behavior, etc.) play a role in determining a sentence?
Answers
On the other hand, others argue that an offender's background should not play a role in determining a sentence, as it could lead to unequal treatment under the law. If two individuals commit the same crime, they should receive the same punishment, regardless of their background characteristics. Additionally, some argue that focusing on an offender's background could lead to a "blame the victim" mentality, where the offender's behavior is excused or minimized because of their upbringing or other factors outside of their control.
Ultimately, the role that an offender's background should play in determining a sentence is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of a variety of factors.
Research CA state measure (Proposition) 18,22,25, Pick one. Write 3 sentences minimum about how and why you would vote for this one Measure if you could vote.
Plzzzzzz help!!!
Answers
Answer:
Proposition 18: The allowance of 17 year olds to vote in primary elections if they will be 18 by the time of the general election.
Explanation:
I would vote yes for proposition 18 to amend the California constitution to allow 17 year olds the right to vote in the Primary election if the person will be 18 years old by the time of the General election. Many states have adopted this amendment and allow 17 year olds to vote if they meet this standard. This would allow 17 year olds to choose who they can vote for on their general election ballot. I believe it is fair to allow them to vote as they should have a voice in their candidates for the general election.
Is cruel and unusual punishment ever justified?
Answers
The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment, which has been interpreted to mean that punishment should not involve torture, or degrading or inhumane treatment.
However, in some cases, the justification of the use of cruel and unusual punishment is a topic of debate. Supporters of harsh punishment argue that it can deter people from committing crimes and maintain law and order.
On the other hand, opponents of such punishment argue that it violates human rights and that there are alternative forms of punishment that can be equally effective.
In any case, it is essential to consider the circumstances of the case and the nature of the crime when deciding whether to apply cruel and unusual punishment. In some instances, such as terrorism or war crimes, there may be a need to impose harsh penalties to ensure justice and protect society.
Nevertheless, the use of cruel and unusual punishment should always be limited and subject to strict legal and ethical standards to prevent abuse and uphold the principles of justice and human dignity.
For more such questions on punishment
https://brainly.com/question/29429795
#SPJ11
How do you draft a bill
Answers
difference between senators for life and senators by right
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Rules are meant to be broken when needed.
When you can't do anything about a situation and the last option is to break the rules. Depending on the time and situation given. You do the crime you do the time. For example. If you had to come up with the money to save your family and time is not on your side the last thing you can do is to steal for the ones you love then if it saves their life wouldn't anyone risk their life for their family? When I say risk their life I mean freedom. We all know the consequences that follow and we will sacrifice our own self to save those we love especially our children/our loved ones people who mean everything to us. If we had no choice given and we tried our best to get help from everyone to anyone but no one was there to help what else can you/we do?
Now this isn't always the best thing to do in some scenarios but as long as breaking the rules don't involve hurting anyone or taking someone's life away I'm sure that if it saves a life or many lives then yes rules are meant to be broken. I would break it if needed just to save many or even just 1 life because 1 matters.
Anyways RULES should stay the way it is it has worked for so long but there are just some that need to be looked into that may need a little bit of tweaking. The rule-makers knows whats best for the people I'm sure they did not just get to where they are at without the knowledge and experience and I'm sure they also had to live the way others did in order to experience what others are experiencing they can even be beside us and we don't even know it. To know what rules are to be broken you must first experience the reasoning as to why they had to be broken. The reasonings vs the excuses. Which one outweighs is there's a will there's a can. You will do your hardest to succeed in life by obeying rules along the way. Rules are there not to keep us in line but to help us along the way. We have our own will our own rights and the knowledge to know what is wrong or right we also are given the feeling that we have felt in our journey and we know when something seems to be off or wrong like Spiderman we get these senses. A666nd it is up to us to follow it. Our intuition plays a big part you will sense things that makes eye doesn't see this is when your body mind and soul aligns and when it does you just know and feel that you must do what you believe is right even thou you know that it may break some rules but you just know that you need to it because you can see it by the experience you have encountered and the knowledge you have learned from it. And when you feel that something just isn't right or you just feel that it's needed you go with your feeling and what you believe. And because you believe you need to see for yourself that what you feel is right so you go blindness into the unknown and you hope that you are right and if you arnt well atleast you went with what you believe in and now you know. Atleast it was your own choice. So let me ask now thesame questions are rules meant to be broken? Yes they are but that's the test of life the questions we should ask is. What are you willing to sacrifice? Your freedom? Or the freedom of others? If you can make a difference and if you had to endure all the pain and suffering to change something wouldn't you sacrifice yourself if it helps all of us? If it can make a difference?
The fine for a first time littering ticket is
up to:
$250
Answers
Because yes and ys
In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court struck down state laws outlawing the use of contraceptives on the basis of privacy rights. The fact that the Court relied on a right to privacy that is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution reflects ________.
Answers
Answer:
the view that the Court's interpretation of the Constitution needs to change with the times
Explanation:
Is there a difference between a education permit and an instructional permit?
Answers
An education permission and now an instructional permit do differ from one another.
What does a permit look like?A visa is a formal document that grants permission to accomplish something. For instance, obtaining a work permit to work abroad is typically required. He needs to submit a permission application, and we need to get him a job.
A sort of permission given to those learning to drive is known as an education permit and is sometimes referred to as a drivers licence or temporary license. With the use of this permit, the person is able to test driving under the guidance of a valid driver's license.
A person can take driving lessons from a certified instructor with the use of an instructional permit. With this permit, the person is only permitted to practice driving with a certified instructor and not on their own.
To know more about Permit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30378153
#SPJ1
Acme Builders was unable to pay National Contractors for work completed
on a housing project. What remedy would National Contractors most likely
seek?
A.mechanic's lien
B. A bankruptcy
C. A mortgage foreclosure
D. A garnishment
Answers
The mechanics liens is going to be the most likely remedy that the contractors would seek for.
What is the mechanic's lien?This is a legal statement that is made against a property. The lien is usually used by the subcontractors due to the fact that they have worked on a property and have not received payment for the job.
It is a way of seeking payment for the job they have done in this housing project.
Read more on mechanic lien here https://brainly.com/question/26368971
The remedy that the National Contractors would most likely seek would be a mechanic's lien, so the correct answer is A.
LienThe lien is the right of a creditor not to hand over a movable property in his possession to the debtor until his performance or effort has been paid. An example is the garage that does not have to hand in the car if the repair is not paid.
It is an elaboration of the general right of suspension. The right of retention occurs in most legal systems, but the exact interpretation can differ considerably.
Learn more about mechanic's lien in https://brainly.com/question/20046367
Please help will mark brainlest
AN ORANGE AND RED SIGN OF THIS SHAPE MEANS:
A. Roadwork ahead
B. Vehicle has the right-of-way
C. Slow-moving vehicle
Answers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Assuming the shape you are talking about is a triangle like shape with red boarders and a orange inside; The sign is a Slow moving vehicles.
answer:
c. slow-moving vehicle
explanation:
by goo-gle definition; shoulder work ahead. slow-moving vehicles, such as farm tractors, road maintenance vehicles, and animal-drawn carts, display an orange and red triangle on the back.
good luck :)
hopefully, this helps
have a nice day !!
Compare and contrast 2 current Interest Groups and the strategies each use to influence congress.
Answers
Answer:
Direct lobbying is used to influence legislative bodies directly via communication with members of the legislative body.Direct lobbying refers to methods used by lobbyists to influence legislative bodies through direct communication with members of the legislative body, or with a government official who participates in formulating legislation.During the direct lobbying process, the lobbyist introduces to the legislator information that may supply favors, may otherwise be missed or makes political threats. A common use of direct lobbying is to persuade the general public about a ballot proposal. In this case, the public is considered to be the legislator. This aspect of direct lobbying attempts to alter the legislature before it is placed on the ballot. Communications regarding a ballot measure are also considered direct lobbying. Direct lobbying is different from grassroots lobbying, a process that uses direct communication with the general public, which, in turn, contacts and influences the government.
Direct techniques
Lobbyists employ direct lobbying in the United States to influence United States legislative bodies through direct interaction with legislators.
As a protest against overseas military action by
the government, about 600 sign-carrying stu-
dents from a local school gathered peacefully
at a major road intersection. As curious drivers
slowed to observe, traffic came to a standstill.
Within minutes, the police moved in and forced
the crowd to break up. Several individuals who
dropped their signs and "went limp" on the
pavement were arrested. Did the police action
violate the protesters' First Amendment consti-
tutional right "peaceably to assemble"?
Answers
No, the police action did not violate the protesters' First Amendment constitutional right "peaceably to assemble" they only tried to remove the from the street because they were obstructing traffic.
Traffic signs should be respected. The coordination of traffic is done along a street in order to reduce stops and delays. The protesters were given right to protest but not at the expense of stopping people from going about their duties because obstruction of traffic will also stop movement.Conclusively, we can say that No, the police action did not violate the protesters' First Amendment constitutional right "peaceably to assemble" they only tried to remove the from the street because they were obstructing .
Learn more from:
https://brainly.com/question/19244187
Need ASAP : Question # 1 File Upload Project: Protecting the Crime Scene and Evidence You've now read about the first moments of a crime scene. You know that taking care of the injured is important and a primary task of the first responders. You've also learned that protecting the evidence is a big responsibility for all first responders, officers, investigators, and the forensic team. In this assignment you'll get a chance to find evidence, identify the steps necessary to secure a crime scene, and organize the evidence to help a crime investigator solve a crime. The Crime Scenario The backdoor alarm went off at the residence of 979 West Valley Road at 11:27 pm. Alarm company tried to reach the customer at 11:28 pm with no response, so at 11:29 pm the police were notified and dispatched to the residence. The police arrived at 11:36 pm and both officers got out of the car to inspect the home. As they were walking toward the front door, they heard a cry for help. Both officers drew their guns and proceeded to walk around the home toward the back door. Once at the back door, which was ajar, officers entered announcing themselves loudly. They did see a hammer lying on the kitchen floor. As they continued through the room again calling out that they were the police, the only answering sound was from a woman calling for help. The officers went through the kitchen and entered the living room noticing the woman on the floor. As one officer, Dan Forte went to the woman, the other officer Max Crenn called for back-up and an ambulance. Officer Crenn then proceeded down the hallway toward the bedroom to examine it, and then toward an office which was completely in disarray. He noticed that the office window was open. Officer Crenn then continued to look into another bedroom, its closets, and the two bathrooms in order to secure the one story home. In the meantime, Officer Forte was busy assessing the woman’s condition. She was coherent enough to give the officer her name and to explain what had happened. The victim, Mrs. Karen Mart
Answers
The steps and evidences necessary to help a crime investigator in solving a crime are fingerprints on the hammer lying on the kitchen floor; the woman on the floor; office window was open; the detailed explanation of the whole situation by a woman, proper investigation of every part of the home.
What is crime investigation?The crime investigation is the process of gathering information and evidence to determine who committed a crime and to build a case against them. The investigation is typically conducted by the law enforcement agencies and police.
The primary objective of a crime investigation is to identify and arrest the person or persons responsible for a crime. This may involve gathering evidence on the basis of crime scene.
The crime scene reported in the scenario of the above question can be protected by the following steps: examining the fingerprints on the objectionable objects which were at the place of crime; the detailed explanation of the whole situation by the victim, proper investigation of every part of the premise where the crime has done.
Learn more about crime investigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/27660961
#SPJ1
Laurie was arrested for some very minor traffic violations her bail was set unreasonably high at 500,000 which she will not be able to pay so she will have to remain in jail until her hearing
Answers
As Laurie was arrested for some very minor traffic violations and her bail was set unreasonably high at $500,000 which she will not be able to pay which will have to make her remain in jail until her hearing, this scenario is not in compliance with the 8th Amendment.
What is the 8th Amendment?This refers to the federal legislation that limits the sanctions that may be imposed by the criminal justice system on those accused or convicted of criminal behaviour. The 8th Amendment contains three clauses which limit the amount of bail associated with a criminal infraction, the fines that may be imposed, and also the punishments that may be inflicted.
The legislation states that "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Also, it is often mentioned in the context of the death penalty as the Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, but also mentions “excessive fines” and bail. This excessive fines clause surfaces (among other places in cases of civil and criminal forfeiture, for instance, when property is seized during a drug raid.
Therefore, as she was arrested for some very minor traffic violations and her bail was set unreasonably high at $500,000 which she will not be able to pay which will have to make her remain in jail until her hearing, this scenario is not in compliance with the 8th Amendment.
Read more about 8th Amendment
brainly.com/question/11287518
#SPJ1
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
Which part of the victim's body should Jerry collect blood from?
Jerry is a toxicologist working on a murder case. He needs to determine if the case is that of poisoning.
Jerry should collect _______
or peripheral blood from the deceased's body.
Answers
Answer:
The veins
Explanation:
Q who was the defendant in roe v wade?
Answers
Answer:
Henry Wade was the defendant in Roe vs Wade.
Explanation:
Answer:
The two defendants or attorneys were Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee.
Explanation:
Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington argued in favor of Roe, and her right to have an abortion in the case Roe v Wade. Coffee came up with the name Roe. Although Weddington is more well known for this case, Coffee was the one that came in contact with Norma McCorvey also known as Roe!.
I got uuu dw dw
True or false: If you are over 18, you will not be required to take the written portion of the driver's text.
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
As long as you are not below 18, it is allowed
In democracies such as the U.S., the governing legislature serves as an
example of majority rule. Which of these congressional procedures reflect(s)
the principle of simple majority rule?
A. Election of the president by a majority of the Electoral College
B. Ending a filibuster by a vote of 60 senators
C. Passage of a bill by a vote of 50 percent plus one
D. Passage of a constitutional amendment by a 2/3 vote
E. Popular election of representatives
Answers
The Passage of a bill by a vote of 50 percent plus one is the congressional procedures that reflect the principle of simple majority rule.
What is the principle of simple majority rule?Basically, the simple majority refers to the vote taken by an organization where at least 51% of the members must vote yes to approve a bill before it is accepted.
So, the Majority rule means the decision rule that selects alternatives which have a majority, that is, there is more than half the votes. This is often use in influential decision-making bodies including many legislatures of democratic nations.
Hence, the Passage of a bill by a vote of 50 percent plus one is the congressional procedures that reflect the principle of simple majority rule.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about majority rule
brainly.com/question/13484265
#SPJ1
what is fusion In government
Answers
Answer:
Separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.
A jury convicted two defendants for crimes involving the transportit
aliens. After the trial was over, the federal judge in the case enforced a court rule
that prohibited anyone from interviewing any juror, relative, friend, or associate
of the juror regarding the deliberations or verdict of the jury unless the person
can show good cause. Two weeks after the verdict, a newspaper publisher and
reporter filed a motion to get permission to interview the jurors for a news story.
The court denied the motion.
The publisher and reporter filed a lawsuit, claiming that they have a right under
freedom of the press to gather news and that the denial of access to interview the
jurors violates that constitutional right.
The court defends its ruling and its order not to grant permission by stating that,
like other First Amendment rights, the right to gather news is not absolute. The
purpose of prohibiting interviews of the jury is to protect jurors from annoyance
and harassment. Additionally, freedom of debate and independence of thought
would be stifled if jurors were made to feel that their arguments and ballots were
to be freely published to the public.
The law requires that restrictions of the press's news-gathering rights must be
justified by a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to serve
that interest.
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. Who is the defendant?
3. What does the plaintiff want?
4. What does the defendant want?
5. What is the issue in this case?
What arguments does the plaintiff make?
Answers
The answer responses are:
The plaintiff in this case is the newspaper publisher and reporter.The defendant in this case is the court.The plaintiff wants permission to interview the jurors for a news story.The defendant wants to maintain its ruling and order not to grant permission to interview the jurors.The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff's right to gather news under the First Amendment of the US Constitution is being violated by the defendant's prohibition on interviewing jurors.What arguments does the plaintiff make?The plaintiff argues that they have a right under the freedom of the press to gather news and that the prohibition on interviewing jurors violates this right.
They may also argue that the prohibition is not justified by a compelling governmental interest and is not narrowly tailored to serve that interest, as required by law.
Therefore, the plaintiff may also argue that the prohibition is overly broad and unnecessarily restricts their ability to gather news.
Learn more plaintiff from
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ1
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answers
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
HELPPPPPP
Which amendment best addresses the fears of Federalists like James Madison, that rights and powers not specifically listed in the Constitution or Bill of Rights will not be protected in the future?
the First Amendment
the Fourth Amendment
the Tenth Amendment
the Ninth Amendment
Answers
Answer:
The Fourth Amendment
i hope i can help
Maya was on shift last week during the police department holiday party. She took a
bunch of photos of her coworkers in uniform enjoying the event. They played games
and ate a lot of holiday food. Maya wants to post these pictures on one of her social
media profiles. Why should Maya NOT post these photos?
They show information that could be considered sensitive.
There are people in the images that she isn't friends with.
She isn't in uniform during the party.
Citizen journalists might see the images.
Answers
Maya should not post these photos for several reasons. Firstly, the photos may contain information that could be considered sensitive. As the holiday party took place at the police department, there may be certain aspects of the event that should remain confidential or not be shared publicly. This could include details about the police department's operations, protocols, or internal dynamics. Posting such sensitive information could compromise the security and integrity of the department.
Secondly, if there are people in the images that Maya isn't friends with, it would be respectful to consider their privacy and seek their consent before sharing their images online. People may have different preferences regarding their online presence, and it is important to respect their boundaries and rights.
Thirdly, the fact that Maya isn't in uniform during the party raises questions about the appropriateness of posting these images. If Maya is not in uniform, it may be more difficult for viewers to distinguish between personal and official contexts. This could potentially blur the lines between her personal and professional life, which may not be desirable or appropriate.
Lastly, Maya should consider the potential audience of her social media profile. Citizen journalists or individuals with various intentions might come across the images. It is important to be mindful of how these images could be interpreted or misused by others. Maintaining a level of discretion and professionalism when sharing content related to work events is crucial.
Overall, Maya should exercise caution and discretion when deciding whether or not to post these photos. Respecting the sensitivity of the information, obtaining consent, considering the context, and being mindful of potential viewers are all important factors to consider in order to avoid any unintended consequences.
for more questions on department
https://brainly.com/question/30678414
#SPJ11
27. What form of presidential action (when deciding on a bill) involves the president rejecting the bill and
returning it to Congress with an explanation.
a. No Action
b. Approve and pass
c. Pocket Veto
d. Veto
28. What form of presidential action (when deciding on a bill) involves the president to do nothing while
Congress is in session for 10 days, automatically making the bill law.
a. No Action
b. Approve and pass
c. Pocket Veto
d. Veto
29. What form of presidential action (when deciding on a bill) involves the president to do nothing while
Congress is out of session for 10 days, automatically rejecting the bill.
a. No Action
b. Approve and pass
c. Pocket Veto
d. Veto
Organization of Congress
30. Which position is the most important member of the House of Representatives?
a. Majority Leader
b. President Pro-Tempore
c. Speaker of the House
d. Vice President
31. Whose job is it to break ties in the Senate?
a. Majority Leader
b. President Pro-Tempore
c. Speaker of the House
d. Vice President
32. They “iron out” differences between two versions of a bill.
a. Joint Committee
b. Standing Committee
c. Select Committee
d. Conference Committee
Lobbying/Interest Groups
33. Represents the special interests of the group they work for and puts pressure on the legislative process
and legislators.
a. Whips
b. Interest Group
c. Leaders
d. Lobbyists
SSCG 8abcdefg 9
34. What is a positive of lobbying?
a. Lobbyists serve as a link between government and the people
b. Lobbyists who have the most money can get what they want
c. Lobbyists work for several interest groups
d. Lobbyists are volunteers.
35. What is a negative of lobbying?
a. Lobbyists serve as a link between government and the people
b. Lobbyists who have the most money can get what they want
c. Lobbyists work for several interest groups
d. Lobbyists are volunteers.
Impeachment Process
36. Which house of Congress does the impeachment process begin?
a. House of Representatives
b. Senate
c. Executive Branch
d. Supreme Court
37. Which house of Congress holds the impeachment trial?
a. House of Representatives
b. Senate
c. Executive Branch
d. Supreme Court
38. Who presides over an impeachment trial?
a. All the justices of the Supreme Court
b. Speaker of the House
c. President Pro-Tempore
d. Chief Justice
39. What is impeachment?
a. Removal of an official from office.
b. Charges are formally brought against an official
c. Criminal charges brought against any citizen
40. True or False: The President remains in office during an impeachment trial.
a. True b. False
Answers
27. D
28. B
29. A
30. A
31. C
32. C
33. B
34. A
35. B
36. A
37. D
38. D
39. A
40. False I think you still work until you get impeached
Hope that helped :D
How should judges use their power
Answers
Judges hold a significant amount of power within a legal system, as they have the authority to interpret and apply the law, make rulings on legal disputes, and impose sentences on those convicted of crimes. As such, it is important that judges use their power in a responsible and ethical manner. Here are some key principles that judges should follow when using their power:
Uphold the law: Judges should ensure that their decisions are consistent with the law and the constitution, and that they are made impartially and without bias. They should base their decisions on the facts and the law, rather than their personal beliefs or preferences.
Be fair and impartial: Judges should treat all parties in a case with respect and fairness, regardless of their background, status, or beliefs. They should avoid any appearance of bias or conflict of interest, and should recuse themselves from cases where they have a personal or financial interest.
Consider the consequences: Judges should consider the impact of their decisions on all parties involved, as well as on society as a whole. They should strive to make decisions that are just, equitable, and in the public interest.
Maintain independence: Judges should be free from undue influence or pressure from outside sources, such as politicians or interest groups. They should be able to make decisions based solely on the law and the facts of the case.
Respect the rule of law: Judges should uphold the rule of law and promote respect for the legal system. They should act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the judiciary and the legal system as a whole.
Overall, judges should use their power with care, integrity, and respect for the law and the principles of justice.
What is wrong with police lives matter? I know what’s wrong with it, I just want to see y’all’s a opinion...whoever answers the best gets brainliest
Answers
Answer:
In my eyes there is no right or wrong to it. Don't let a few bad cops make a name for all cops. These are men and women serving their duties and risking their lives each day. Again Don't let a few bad cops make a name for all cops.
Explanation:
Which of the following is true about common law?
A. It is the supreme law of the land in the United States.
B. It is made by the president and ratified by the Senate.
O C. It is authority to issue legal obligations on specific people or
companies.
O D. It is derived from customs and judicial decisions.
Answers
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Common law refers to a legal system in which the law is primarily developed through judicial decisions, rather than through legislation or executive action. Hence option D is correct.
It is based on the principle of stare decisis, which means that previous court decisions serve as binding precedents for future cases. Common law is derived from customs and practices that have developed over time and is shaped by the rulings of judges in specific cases.
It is not the supreme law of the land in the United States; that distinction is held by the Constitution. Similarly, common law is not made by the president and ratified by the Senate, as that process pertains to statutory law.
Learn more about common law here
https://brainly.com/question/30328846
#SPJ6
In the state of Florida your first conviction for DUI when there is a minor in the vehicle with you results in a fine of not less than $1000, or more than
Answers
Answer:
Atleast 9 Months in Jail.
Explanation:
The Florida Statutes, §§ 316.193(4)(a-b):
"List the criminal penalties that are to be imposed for a first conviction of DUI with a child passenger under the age of 18: Jail sentence of up to nine months. A fine of $1,000 to $2,000. Ignition interlock device (IID) for six months."